Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 5201–5400
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vinod Kumar, who was arrested on 4 June 2026 in connection with a case (Crime No.186 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the IPC and Sections 5(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, …
The petitioner, Saroj, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Naib‑Tehsildar of Tarya, Tamkuhiraj, Kushinagar to decide a mutation proceeding (Case No. 1962 of 2022, Computerized No. T202205440101962) pending under Section 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 since 2022. The …
Vishal Gupta applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 375 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 69, 351(2) and 316(2) of the B.N.S. The court examined the material on record, hearing counsel for both the applicant and the State. It noted that the victim is a major aged about 24 …
Roshan Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.202 of 2026) alleging false promise of marriage, charged under IPC sections 64(2)(m), 351(3), 352 and Sections 5(l)/6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant had established a relationship with the victim by promising …
M/s Raj Infratech filed a writ petition (Writ Tax No. 3559 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petition was heard by Hon'ble Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. No detailed facts or legal arguments …
M/s Raj Infratech filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petition was disposed of by the bench comprising Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court did not elaborate on facts or reasoning but …
The petitioner, Binod Kumar Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Shahganj Tehsil to decide a pending mutation case (case no. 5124 of 2026) and to mutate his name in the revenue records based on a registered sale deed dated 12‑01‑2026. The petitioner alleged …
Ravishankar Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.133 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 123, 64(ड), 115(2) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Evidence Act. The victim is a 19‑year‑old adult and the prosecution lacks clinching evidence that the accused misled the victim. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash charge sheets and criminal proceedings arising from allegations under Sections 498A, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The dispute had been settled by a compromise deed dated …
The applicant, Dharmendra Kumar Raghav, was arrested on 21‑02‑2026 in connection with a case (Crime No. 170 of 2026) involving offences under the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act. He applied for bail, asserting his innocence and noting that the victim, who had initially testified, turned hostile …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Geeta Devi, the sister‑in‑law of a deceased person, who was charged under Sections 108 and 85 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged two days after the alleged incident and that the post‑mortem …
The applicants Bhupendra and others filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. Act seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 24‑12‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 26‑06‑2025 in Criminal Case No.84 of 2025. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 351(2) and …
Petitioner Dilip Rai filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing certain state respondents to take preventive legal action against private respondents under the Anti‑Bhumafiya guidelines. The Court examined whether such a direction amounted to an injunction arising from a …
M/s Safi Steels & Traders filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was presented by counsel Pranjal Shukla, while the State was represented by C.S.C. The Bench consisting of Hon'ble Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi disposed of the …
M/s Saifi Steels and Traders filed writ petition No. 3650 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petition sought relief, though the specific relief sought is not detailed in the order. The matter was heard by a bench …
The petition filed by M/S Job Enterprises against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The order directs the parties to refer to the order dated in the case of M/s Maa Gayatri Enterprises vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another (2026:AHC:190551-DB) for …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Smt Bala, a 76‑year‑old woman, who was alleged to be involved in offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The FIR was lodged thirty‑one years after the alleged incident and after a belated …
The applicant Javid filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 326 of 2026) under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed that the prosecution was based on a single case shown in a gang chart for which he had already …
The applicant, Dharmi, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under IPC sections 109, 117(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(2). He claimed that co‑accused Rohit Bhati and Jeetu @ Jitendra had already been granted anticipatory bail by another …
The petitioners, M/s Balaji Tiles and Sanitary, filed writ petition No. 3594 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petition sought relief against the respondents, though the specific relief sought is not detailed in …
The applicant, Rihan, was arrested in Crime No.156 of 2025 under several provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act and has been in custody since 26 March 2025. He filed a second bail application after the first was rejected, but offered no new grounds for release other than the length of …
Smt Pravesh Chawla and three others filed a revision petition before the Allahabad High Court against Sunita Marvah and another. The petitioners' counsel, Akhtar Ali, did not present any substantive grounds or evidence for the revision. Consequently, the Court found that there was no prosecution of …
The applicant, Irshad, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and has no prior criminal record. He had been in custody since 14 …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving multiple IPC offences and a provision of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, alleging false implication in an FIR concerning stone‑pelting and road‑jam. They argued that they were …
M/s Kesarwani Traders filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition was heard by a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The court disposed of the petition, directing that the orders be as per the judgment in M/s Maa Gayatri Enterprises v. …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Smt. Rajni and Smt. Anu (Kamlesh) under CrPC Section 482 in a case involving alleged assault under various IPC sections. The applicants, both women with no criminal record, claimed they were falsely implicated due to …
M/s Ishika Traders filed a writ petition (Writ Tax No. 3628 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was heard by a bench of Hon'ble Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Justice Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed of the petition, …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 15‑11‑2021 in a case involving offences under Sections 406, 420 and 506 IPC. The applicant argued that, per the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club Ltd. v. State of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 10‑10‑2008, the cognizance and summoning order dated 04‑11‑2008, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 7792 of 2020) relating to offences under Sections 323, 324 and …
The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving offences under Sections 333, 325, 352, 351(2) and 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code. The counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular …
The applicant, Ujaifa, sought bail in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955, filed at Police Station Sardhana, Meerut. The court noted that the applicant was not named in the FIR and was only identified later by the informant in a statement recorded four …
Om Prakash Tiwari, the accused in Criminal Case No. 8662 of 2026, was charged under Sections 406, 420 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. He filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of the charge‑sheet and the cognizance/summoning order, contending that Sections 406 (criminal …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay Kumar, who was charged under Sections 74, 78, 107, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, citing a medical report that the alleged victim survived the incident, …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant and the process under Sections 82 and 83 CrPC dated 05‑06‑2023 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 332, 353, 336 and 427 IPC. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 01.08.2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 11.02.2026 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etawah, in a case arising from non‑cognizable offences under Sections 115(2) …
The revisionists, Kalyan Singh and another, challenged the trial court's order rejecting their discharge application in a complaint case under Section 406 IPC. They argued that the evidence recorded under Section 202 CrPC contradicted that under Section 244 CrPC and that the complaint was filed …
Rahul Sharma was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 364 of 2026) alleging offences under IPC sections 109(1) and 351(3), the B.N.S. provision 3(5) and the Arms Act sections 3, 25 and 27. The applicant contended that the injury to the victim was limited to the right hand, not …
Petitioner Akhand Pratap Singh filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the defreezing of his SBI and HDFC bank accounts, alleging that they were frozen without prior intimation. The respondents, the Reserve Bank of India and the two banks, contended that the freeze was justified on the basis …
Jitendra Kumar Rathi filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 28‑01‑2026 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 12‑08‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 22640 of 2026. He contended that the charge‑sheet improperly included both Sections 420 and 406 of the …
The applicant, Sompal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of the charge‑sheet dated 23‑03‑2026, the cognizance order dated 13‑05‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.6210 of 2026) arising from an FIR that alleged offences …
The petition filed by M/s Shri Sharma Medical Hall against the State of U.P. and another was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The court did not elaborate on facts or reasoning, directing that the orders be as per the earlier judgment in M/s Maa Gayatri Inter Prises vs. State of Uttar Pradesh …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 22‑12‑2022 in Criminal Case No.15790 of 2022, which was based on a charge‑sheet under IPC Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506. They contended that these offences …
The applicants, Smt. Shyamo Yadav and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑05‑2023 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 28‑06‑2023 in Criminal Case No. 5314 of 2023. They contended that the charge‑sheet improperly alleged both …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No.13521 of 2022) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, which arose from Crime No.337 of 2020. They relied on a prior order dated …
Chandrapal Singh filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482. He later sought to withdraw that application and instead move a regular bail application in the pending criminal case. The court, after hearing counsel, permitted the withdrawal and granted him liberty to file a regular …
The applicants, Ramu Tiwari and Amrita Tiwari, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged execution of a forged sale deed. They claimed they were unaware of the forgery, having signed the deed under instructions from their mother and grandmother, …
Vijay Chaturvedi filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 59 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 305(B), 317(2) and 317(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. He feared arrest and sought protection to appear …
The applicant, Kahashari Begum, filed an application under Section 173(4) of the BNSS challenging an order dated 21 July 2026 passed by the Additional Session Judge (Special Judge) in Complaint Case No. M/326/12/2026, which rejected her earlier application. The High Court heard counsel for both …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order dated 11‑07‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 638 of 2025 (State vs. Sanjeev Kumar) which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. They contended, relying on a recent Supreme …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising from alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant claimed that he and the second opposite party had …
The applicant, Mohammad Shafiq, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 15104 of 2026) arising from an alleged offence under Section 420 IPC. The applicant argued that he had not been arrested …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving offences under IPC sections 363, 372, 504, 506, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The applicant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and to file a regular bail …
The dispute concerned the election of the Committee of Management of Adarsh Inter College. The Regional Level Committee (RLC) disapproved the elections held on 21‑12‑2025 and ordered fresh elections, but the RLC order was signed by a single officer in two capacities, violating quorum requirements. A …
The applicants Usman, Farhan (Monu) and Nauman sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in a case involving IPC offences of dacoity, hurt, assault, criminal intimidation, attempt to murder and conspiracy. Usman, who has two prior criminal cases, was denied anticipatory bail, with the court …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 21‑11‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 16‑07‑2026 in State v. Waseem and others, relating to offences under Sections 447, 504, 506, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian …
Sachin Chaurasiya filed a criminal revision challenging an order of the Prayagraj Family Court that directed him to pay interim maintenance of Rs.7,000 and Rs.3,000 per month to two opposite parties from the date of the maintenance application (12.01.2026). He expressed willingness to comply but …
The applicant, Rajnesh @ Anurag Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC s.482 after a charge sheet was lodged. The Additional Government Advocate argued that the alleged offences do not carry a punishment exceeding seven years, so there is no fear of arrest. The applicant’s counsel …
Harendra Baliyan filed a writ petition seeking security and submitted a representation dated 17 August 2026 to the District Magistrate. The petitioner, through counsel, requested that the court direct the District Magistrate to consider this representation. The State, represented by the Additional …
Shambhu filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Executive Officer of Nagar Panchayat, Chandauli to pay arrears of the 5th, 6th and 7th pay scales with interest to his father, and to consider his representation within a fixed period. The respondent officer …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak @ Rohit, who was arrested in Crime No.151 of 2026 under several IPC sections. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, citing a five‑month delay in lodging the FIR and a lack of corroborative evidence linking him to the alleged …
Sandhya Sanni Sharma filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 36411 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition and to file a fresh one. The standing counsel …
Chandrawati Devi filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and another respondent. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition and to be allowed to file a fresh one. The standing counsel for the respondents raised no …
Avilpan Nesha filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and another respondent. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition and to be allowed to file a fresh one. The standing counsel for the respondents raised no …
Ashwani Jadaun was arrested in connection with alleged forgery of a vehicle chassis and related offences under several IPC sections and the Income Tax Act. He claimed innocence, stating he had no authority to issue invoices and that the allegations were false. The State opposed bail, but the court …
Vishal applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 725 of 2025) involving charges under Sections 137(2) and 61(1) of the B.N.S. Act and Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, a 17‑year‑old, was a consenting party who voluntarily married …
The applicant, Gopal Sharma, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance‑summoning order dated 16‑04‑2018 in Criminal Case No.6900970, which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. The applicant contended, relying on the …
The petitioner, Birendra Kumar Gautam, filed a writ petition challenging a departmental suspension order dated 18 July 2026 issued by the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The High Court examined the suspension order and found no infirmity in it. Consequently, the Court declined to interfere with …
Koshila Devi filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 36354 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and another respondent. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition and to file a fresh one. The standing counsel for the …
The petition was filed by M/s A.J. Industries through its proprietor Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh challenging a decision of the State Tax Officer. The respondents were the State Tax Officer and another party. Counsel for the petitioner were Nitin Kumar Kesarwani and Shubhanjali Gupta, while the respondent …
Sunil Arora filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 22‑08‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 10‑07‑2025 in State v. Sumti Arora, which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant contended, relying on the Supreme Court’s …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajkumar in a criminal case (Crime No. 179 of 2026) alleging abduction and forced sexual relations with a major girl. The prosecution’s FIR alleged that the accused enticed the victim away, while the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 …
Mashkoor applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case where he was charged with offences including rape, dowry prohibition violations, and various IPC offences. This was his second anticipatory bail application; the first had been dismissed after the charge sheet was filed. …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 13‑11‑2025 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 352, 351(3) of the IPC, Section 109 of the B.N.S and Section 30 of the …
The Committee of Management of Rishi Bhumi Inter College filed a writ petition seeking the court’s intervention to expedite the decision on its applications dated 1 April 2026 and a reminder dated 17 July 2026, which were pending before the Director of Education (Secondary), Uttar Pradesh. The …
The applicant Sachin filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance order in case 38659 of 2026, which was based on a charge‑sheet filed by the police for offences under Sections 352 and 351(3) of the BNSS. The applicant contended that these offences are …
The applicant, Rahul Dilawar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the cognizance order issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 323 and 308 IPC. He contended that he was falsely …
Harish Chaudhary filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 18‑06‑2025 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 7676 of 2026) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The charge sheet alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kamlesh Chauhan, who was accused under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged abetment to suicide of a deceased individual. The applicant, a sister of the second wife of the deceased, argued that the death was a hanging …
The petitioner, Smt. Sanju Kumari, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Mathura, to expedite the disposal of a pending family law case (Case No. 183 of 2025) arising under Section 144 of the B.N.S.S. Police Station. …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Shahrukh, who was arrested under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, in Crime No. 227 of 2026. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated due to police …
Puneet Kumar challenged the dismissal of his appeal against an order passed under Section 6A of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, which had led to the confiscation of 479 quintals of rice. The appeal before the Sessions Judge, Bulandshahr, was dismissed on the ground of want of prosecution …
Petitioner Vijit Tyagi challenged an order dated 17.07.2026 by the District Magistrate, Hapur, which externed him for six months under Sections 3/4 of the U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970, based on eleven pending cases. He filed an appeal (No. 1856 of 2026) under Section 6 of the same Act before …
Petitioners Hare Ram Pandey and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought to withdraw the petition, requesting that they be allowed to challenge any orders that might be passed thereafter. The court considered whether a …
Petitioner Pankaj Yadav was declared a "goonda" and externed for six months under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Control of Goondas Act, 1970, based on ten criminal cases. He appealed the externment order to the Commissioner, Bareilly Division, and sought a stay of the Commissioner’s order …
Petitioner Kulli Devi filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing forest authorities not to dispossess her 1.2530 hectare forest land (Gata No. 41) pending the disposal of her petition under Sections 9 and 11 of the Indian Forest Act before the Forest Settlement Officer. The …
Mahendra Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging the order of sanction in a criminal case. The applicant, through counsel Santosh Yadav, sought permission to withdraw the application while reserving the right to contest the sanction order before a …
The applicant, Intzar, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 374 of 2026) under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on police rivalry, that he is not a gang member, and that he …
Shanti Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, applied for bail in a case filed under Sections 85, 108, 352 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She contended that she was falsely implicated, that the FIR was lodged belatedly, and that the prosecution had not …
The applicant, Farman, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 416 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5 and 9 of the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025. The High Court considered the facts, the lack of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Amit Kumar, who was arrested in connection with an accidental drowning that resulted in the death of an informant's wife. The applicant claimed false implication, citing a six‑day delay between the incident (23‑06‑2026) and the filing of the FIR …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No. 419 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 110 and 351(3) of the BNSS, fearing arrest. The State opposed, arguing that the alleged offences do not attract a punishment exceeding seven years …
Kashinath Pandey, appointed as a Certificate Writer at Sampurnanand Sanskrit University in 1992, challenged the university's refusal to regularise his position, arguing that his juniors appointed similarly had already been regularised. The court noted that the earlier judgment in Nigameshwar …
Ankit Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.102 of 2026) filed under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the charges were the result of police rivalry, that he was not a gang member, and that he had already …
The applicant, Sama Bano, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, claiming that he was charged under Section 137(2) of the BNS, a cognizable but bailable offense. The learned Additional Government Advocate objected, stating that anticipatory bail is …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Bhanu Pratap Singh, a retired executive engineer, in a case under Sections 13(1)(b) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 alleging excess income of Rs.52 lakh. The applicant argued that the allegations …
Shivam Pal @ Jwala Singh applied for bail in a case (Crime No.53 of 2026) under Section 109(1) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, arising from a police firing incident in which he sustained a gunshot injury. The applicant argued that he was a victim of cross‑fire and that …
The applicant, Sahil Shilpkaar, was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 352 of 2026) under Sections 3(5) BNS and Sections 3, 5A, 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, Prayagraj. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court noted that the sole basis of his implication was a …
The applicant Durgesh Dubey filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 10‑03‑2026 and a cognizance order dated 01‑06‑2026 passed by a Judicial Magistrate in Jaunpur. The applicant contended that the offences alleged—Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and …
The applicants, Keshav and 13 others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 187 of 2026) arising from charges under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 121(1), 132, 125, 115(2), 352 and 3(v) of the BNS. The High Court …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Omendra Singh in a case involving IPC offences 420, 467, 468 and 471. The applicant argued that he had no criminal antecedents, no coercive process had been initiated, and that the charge sheet had …
The applicant, Pintu Chauhan, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 22‑11‑2023 in a case where he was charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended, …
The applicant, Pradeep, was arrested in connection with Crime No.293 of 2024, charged under IPC sections 302, 120‑B, 504, 506, 34 and Arms Act sections 3, 25 and 27. He has been in custody since 19 June 2024 and filed a second bail application after an earlier one was rejected. The counsel for the …
Neha Sharma filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the summoning order and charge sheet in Criminal Case No. 99192 of 2024 (State vs. Lokesh et al.) which alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 506 and 120B IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 420 (cheating) and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 7257 of 2024) arising from Crime No. 309 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had already reached an amicable …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kishori, accused in Crime No. 60 of 2026 for offences including rape and assault under sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 333 and 64 of the B.N.S. The FIR was lodged more than a month after the alleged incident via Section 173(4) and was based on a …
The petitioner, Sudheendra Kumar Singh, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Azamgarh to expedite the disposal of Complaint Case No. 291 of 2020, which involves offences under Sections 498A, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 11732 of 2025) relating to offences under Sections 352, 351(3) and 109(1) of the IPC arising from a dispute in …
The applicants, Mustakeem and Smt. Bhoori, who are the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of the alleged victim, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case alleging that they administered a poisonous substance to the victim. The prosecution alleged offences under IPC …
Petitioner Ravi Shankar Pandey filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the defreezing of his bank account No. 3207101003530, which had been frozen following a complaint to an investigating agency alleging doubtful transactions. The respondent bank contended that the freeze was justified on …
The applicant filed a transfer application seeking to move a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Case No. 853 of 2023) from the Special Court in Gautambudh Nagar to another court. The applicant alleged that the trial court violated the mandatory six‑month disposal period …
The petitioner, Jitendra Singh, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Varanasi, to decide his pending complaint (Case No. 591 of 2025) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act within a fixed period. The petitioner argued …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 27‑09‑2021 issued in a 2010 case involving offences under Sections 323, 324, 504 and 506 IPC. They argued that they had already been granted bail but failed to …
The applicant, Yusuf, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Crime No.190 of 2016 (State of U.P. v. Yusuf) which involved charges under Sections 398 and 401 of the IPC, the charge‑sheet dated 25‑02‑2014 and a non‑bailable warrant. The High Court …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramjeet Lodhi in a case involving alleged assault and death of a victim. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing out that the medical evidence did not support the prosecution's claim that the assault caused the victim's …
Petitioner Phool Chandra filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to decide a revision filed under Rule‑23 of the U.P. Police Officers of the Subordinate Rank (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991. The petitioner argued that the revision was pending and required …
Petitioner Chandrasen Dubey filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to pay his salary for 12 days of sanctioned medical leave (28.03.2026 to 12.04.2026) and to consider his earlier representations for selection grade. The State, through its standing counsel, …
The applicant, Sachin, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 110, 352 and 115(2) of the B.N.S. Act, claiming false implication and asserting that the injuries to parties on both sides were mutual. …
Petitioners, serving as Sub Inspectors and Head Constables in the Uttar Pradesh Police, filed a writ under Article 226 seeking an additional increment after completing 19 years of service, relying on the precedent set in Ghanshyam Tiwari v. State of U.P. and subsequent cases. The Court noted that …
The applicant, Rajendra Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 9 January 2026 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 11 May 2026 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh in case no. 7675 of 2026. The contention was that the charge …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Jang Bahadur Singh under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under the U.P. Gangster and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant argued that the FIR was vague, did not satisfy the …
The petitioner, Jitendra Singh, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 14457 of 2026) challenging the order of suspension dated 17 August 2026 issued by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition sought to set aside the suspension on the ground that it was illegal. The learned Judge perused the impugned …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mohammad Imran, a stenographer accused under IPC sections 420 and 120‑B and Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly certifying a document. The applicant claimed innocence, no criminal history, and argued that the …
The applicant, Bunty Khan, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 05‑07‑2022 in Criminal Case No. 7944 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 74, 115(2) and 351(2) of the BNSS, claiming fear of arrest. The State opposed, arguing that the offences do not attract a punishment of more than seven years and …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Priti in a criminal case under Section 108 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging abetment of suicide. The prosecution’s case rested on alleged illicit relations with a co‑accused and marital discord, while the post‑mortem report showed …
The petitioner, Smt. Renu, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge Junior Division, Sonbhadra, to decide Civil Suit No.138 of 2022 within a stipulated period. The Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar …
The applicant, Akbar Ali, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 16‑01‑2023 in Criminal Case No. 932 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC arising from a 2021 incident. The applicant contended, relying on …
Bharat Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Consolidation Officer, Katghara, Jaunpur, to decide his objection dated 23 May 2025 under Section 9‑A(2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act. The petitioner argued that the matter, filed in 2025, remained unresolved, causing …
The petitioner, Sibbu Kumar Patel, a foreman at a Government Industrial Training Institute in Ghazipur, challenged a transfer order on the ground that he has a 40% permanent disability in his left eye. He relied on Clause 5(iv) of the Transfer Policy dated 05.05.2026, which exempts employees with …
The applicant, Ambrish Srivastava, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 8 April 2021 and the entire proceedings of case No. 95215 of 2021, which involved charges under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal …
Manish Yadav was charged under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act in Crime No.126 of 2025. He applied for bail while the trial was pending. The court examined the facts, the submissions of counsel, and noted that a co‑accused, …
The applicant Rajjab was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 3 and 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, alleged to have occurred at Pahadi police station, Chitrakoot. He sought bail, claiming innocence, that the FIR was filed a day after the alleged offence, lacked any mention of …
Ramdayal Rai was arrested in a case registered under Sections 498‑A, 377, 323, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the FIR was false, filed after an application under Section 156(3) of the CrPC, and that there was no medical evidence to support the …
The applicant Anil Kumar Patel filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 24‑03‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 07‑11‑2025 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mau, in a case arising from offences under Sections 324(4), 351(2) and 352 BNS. The …
The applicant Pooja filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 16‑05‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 02‑06‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 8767 of 2025 (State of U.P. v. Gulfam). The ground relied upon was that the charge sheet alleged offences …
Shri Shyam Sunder filed Writ‑A No.14481 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that a representation dated 15 September 2025, which formed the basis of the petition, had already been decided by the …
Petitioner Arun Nishad filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to release Rs. 4 lakh as natural disaster relief under the Disaster Management Act, 2005. The petitioner had already submitted a representation to Respondent No.3 on …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 filed by Kunj Bihari Sharan. The State opposed, highlighting an undisclosed prior case (Case Crime No. 327 of 2005) involving offences under Sections 147, 307, 323, 452 and 506 IPC. The court held that the applicant’s …
The applicant, Ompal Sharma, was named among twelve accused in a case involving assault causing non‑life‑threatening injuries to three victims. He had no prior criminal record and had earlier obtained interim protection from arrest in a writ petition, which was later dismissed. The applicant sought …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 61(2), 316(2) and 351(3) of the BNSS, 2023, fearing arrest in Crime No.196 of 2026. The State’s Additional Government Advocate objected, arguing that the alleged offences do not attract a punishment exceeding seven years and that …
Rajesh Harijan was arrested in a case (Crime No.269 of 2025) under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleged to be a gang member. He filed a bail application asserting that the charge was a result of police rivalry, that he had already been granted …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a cognizance order dated 15‑April‑2025 and the related proceedings in a case arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNSS. They contended that these offences are non‑cognizable and, per the …
Affinity Comsol Private Limited filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 29‑04‑2024 issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for the FY 2018‑19, alleging it missed the statutory time‑limit for filing an appeal due to lack of knowledge of the order. The State argued that a …
Affinity Comsol Private Limited filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28‑08‑2024 issued by the State under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for the FY 2019‑2020. The petitioner argued that it was unaware of the order and therefore could not file the statutory appeal within …
The petition filed by M/s Saurabh Enterprises challenged an order dated 27‑02‑2025 issued by the State under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for the FY 2020‑21, contending that it was unaware of the order and therefore could not file the statutorily prescribed appeal within the …
M/s Saurabh Enterprises filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18‑12‑2023 issued by the State under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for the FY 2017‑18. The petitioner argued that it was unaware of the order and therefore could not file the statutory appeal within the …
Kayamuddin alias Raju applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.149 of 2026) involving charges under Sections 109(1), 317(2), 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code, the Arms Act (Section 3/25) and the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act (Section 3/8). The incident arose from a police firing in …
Petitioner Shakil Ahmad applied for a character certificate, which the Superintendent of Police rejected without providing any reason. The petitioner had a criminal case pending against him, but obtained a stay of that case from the High Court on 30 January 2026. The petitioner challenged the …
The applicant, Vaseebu @ Vaseem, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 142 of 2026) under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. He claimed absolute innocence, stating that the alleged contraband was recovered from another accused who had already been granted bail. The prosecution …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 09‑08‑2025 and related proceedings under Section 318(4) of the BNSS and Sections 8, 11 and 12 of the Molasses Control Act. They alleged that no offence was disclosed against them and that the …
Himanshu Thakur applied for bail in a case (Crime No.172 of 2026) involving eleven FIRs under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1932 and the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. The court noted that a co‑accused, Manisha Chauhan, had already …
The applicant, Anil Kumar, was arrested for allegedly demanding Rs.10,000 in exchange for a report, an offence alleged under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He has been in custody since 24 July 2026 and has no prior criminal record. The primary issue before the court was whether …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Harbir in criminal case No.130 of 2026 under Sections 8, 15 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, alleging that two separate recoveries of …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Smt. Sunita, who is accused of embezzlement under IPC sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 and 120‑B. The first bail application had been dismissed, but the applicant argued that the trial had stalled for five months after framing of …
The applicant, Mubarik, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No. 103 of 2024) involving alleged NDPS offences under Sections 8, 18 and 29. He claimed false implication, noting that the co-accused Nadeem was caught with 500 grams of opium and that his …
Petitioner Angad, employed in Saudi Arabia, approached the Allahabad High Court under Article 226 seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the Union of India to re‑issue his expired passport. The respondents argued that, under Section 4(2) of the Passport Act, 1967, the petitioner must first obtain an …
Petitioner Babita Srivastava, a stenographer in the Public Works Department, Prayagraj, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the respondents to regularize her service and grant benefits under the old pension scheme, as well as to decide her representation dated 17‑08‑2026. The petition …
The petitioner, Amit Sharma, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking to set aside an ex-parte stay order dated 02.01.2026 granted by the Sessions Judge, Mathura, in Criminal Revision No. 1 of 2026 (Smt. Meera Sharma & Others v. State of U.P. & Others). The petitioner argued …
Shivshankar Bind applied for bail in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and that he had already been granted bail in a related gang chart case. He asserted that he …
The applicant Rohit filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashing of a charge sheet dated 25‑08‑2025 and a cognizance order dated 18‑09‑2025 passed by the Civil Judge (C.D.)/F.T.C., Jaunpur in case no. 958 of 2025. The applicant contended that the offences alleged under …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Pradeep Kumar Saroj, who had been in custody since 14 July 2026 in a case under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. No counsel appeared for the applicant; the judge examined …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 29 March 2026 and the entire proceedings in State vs. Ramakant and others (Case No. 2066 of 2026). The charge sheet pertained to offences under Sections 329(3), 111(7), 352 …
The petitioners, Renewable Energy, challenged an order dated 30‑12‑2025 issued by the State under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for FY 2021‑22, arguing that they were unaware of the order and thus missed the statutory time limit for filing an appeal. The State contended that the …
Petitioner Nirbhay Kumar Rai filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending passport application. The respondents, including the Union of India, informed the Court that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner because of a criminal case (crime no. 194 of …
M/S Vk Constructions filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16‑08‑2023 issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for the FY 2022‑23, alleging it could not file a statutory appeal within the prescribed limitation due to lack of knowledge of the order. The State argued that …
M/S Vk Constructions filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16‑08‑2023 issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for the FY 2022‑23, alleging that it could not file a statutory appeal within the prescribed limitation due to lack of knowledge of the order. The State …
M/S Vk Constructions filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16‑08‑2023 issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for FY 2022‑23, alleging it could not file the statutory appeal within the prescribed limitation due to lack of knowledge of the order. The State contended that …
Mithilesh Kumar Singh filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 04‑08‑2023 issued by the State under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for the FY 2020‑21, alleging that he could not file a statutory appeal within the prescribed limitation period. The State argued that the …
The applicants, Imran and six others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and related proceedings after reaching an out‑of‑court settlement with one of the opposite parties. The trial court verified the compromise, and the State agreed to withdraw …
The petitioner, Ramanuj Pandey, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission's order rejecting his candidature for the post of Regional Inspector (Technical) and a mandamus directing the commission to allow him to sit for the practical examination. …
Chini Kuraishi and eleven other petitioners filed a revision application before the Allahabad High Court against Waqf Maszid Roti Walan. The petitioners were represented by counsel Tanzeel Ahmad and Yash Padia, while the opposite party was represented by Jawahir Yadav and Narendra Kumar. No …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 22‑01‑2026. The State and the second opposite party did not contest the settlement. The …
Petitioners Dinesh Narayan Dubey and another filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated. No …
The applicant, Saumya Mishra, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, and the opposite party, represented by Kamal Kumar Singh and Sudhir Kumar Mishra, was present. The court observed that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, claiming that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 06‑02‑2026. The State, represented by the learned A.G.A., did not contest the settlement. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, claiming that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court. The trial court had confirmed the settlement on 30.01.2026, and the opposite party 2 …
Komal Devi filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 899 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. The applicant was represented by counsel Ravindra Kumar, while the opposite party, Puspraj Singh, was represented by Shivam Singh. No appearance was made by the applicant to …
The petitioners, Mukesh Kumar and another, filed a civil revision in the Allahabad High Court challenging a lower court order. The revision was valued at less than Rs.25 lakhs, which under the applicable procedural rules makes it non‑maintainable before the High Court. The court, relying on the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 19‑02‑2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the State and the second …
The revision petition filed by Anurag Agarwal against Sunil Gupta was listed before the High Court but no appearance was made by the petitioner. The petitioner failed to prosecute the revision, and consequently, the court examined whether the revision could be entertained in the absence of any …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Case No. 655 of 2025) on the ground that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 30 January 2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, claiming that the dispute with the State and other respondents had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 19‑02‑2026. The High Court noted that the parties had indeed …
The petitioners, Rajesh Agarwal and others, filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, and only the respondents' counsel was present. The court observed that there was no prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the …
The petitioners, Rajesh Kumar Agarwal and others, filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners and no steps were taken to prosecute the petition. The respondents, Smt. Sunita Jain and others, were represented by counsel Sudeep …
The petitioners sought to set aside an appellate order that granted a temporary injunction in a 2006 suit for permanent injunction concerning a disputed property, arguing that the earlier 1996 suit challenging a 1993 will was still pending. The court noted that the 1996 suit, which sought to declare …
The appeal filed by New India Assurance Co. challenged the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of Rs.15,33,656 to the dependents of Sharda Prasad, who died in a bus accident. The insurer argued that the Tribunal had improperly accepted a salary certificate without proper proof and had misrecorded …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 21 October 2021 that had been issued in a criminal complaint under Sections 452, 323 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that the dispute was purely civil, …
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.4,30,000 as compensation to the legal representatives of a deceased woman, basing the amount on loss of dependency using her pension income. The insurer appealed, arguing that the claimants were not financially dependent on the deceased and that the …
The appellant Rakesh was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Agra, for raping an 18‑month‑old girl and for house‑trespass, under Sections 376 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to ten years imprisonment and a fine. The prosecution case relied on eyewitness testimony of the …
The decree‑holder Jagpal filed a civil revision challenging the Additional District Judge’s order dismissing his 2009 execution petition for unpaid 12% interest on compensation awarded in a land‑acquisition case. The earlier execution petition filed in 1998 had been concluded in 2003 after the …
The applicant, Jamal Akhtar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 17‑April‑2010 and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 10745 of 2010) arising from offences under Sections 324, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant alleged false implication, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No. 557 of 2025, which arose from a case of alleged offences under various IPC sections. The applicants argued that they were falsely implicated and that the proceedings constituted an abuse of process, …
The petitioner, Radhey Shyam Vishwakarma, was initially appointed as Assistant Clerk in 1973 and later appointed as Assistant Teacher on 20 July 1992 to fill a short‑term vacancy created by the promotion of another teacher. He sought regularisation under Section 33‑F of the U.P. Secondary Education …
The petitioner, a Postal Assistant, was dismissed from service after being convicted by the CBI Court for forging educational documents. He challenged the dismissal, arguing that he was not given a reasonable opportunity to respond to the show‑cause notice while in jail and that the departmental …
Petitioners Anuj Tiwari and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel later informed the court that the concerned authorities had already complied with the relief sought, and the petitioners wished to withdraw the petition. No opposition was raised to this …
Shailendra Kumar filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 23‑02‑2021 in a case where he was charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. The applicant argued that, according to the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club …
The petitioner Prithavipal challenged an auction scheduled for 11 September 2026 of a pond plot (Plot No. 377) after his fishery lease, granted in 2023, was cancelled by an order dated 13 June 2026. He had filed a revision petition before the Uttar Pradesh Board of Revenue on 12 August 2026, seeking …
The petitioner, Ram Dulare, challenged the scheduled auction of plot no. 362 (a pond) on the ground that his fishery lease, granted after an auction in January 2023, had been cancelled by an order dated 13 June 2026. He filed a revision petition before the Uttar Pradesh Board of Revenue on 12 August …
The accused Pravesh applied for bail in a criminal case under sections 109(1), 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. This was his second bail application after a prior denial. He argued that the incident never occurred and that five prosecution witnesses had not supported the …
The Union of India filed a writ petition challenging a Central Administrative Tribunal order that directed the release of a retired railway servant's pension despite a pending criminal appeal against his conviction. The respondent, a former Helper in the North Eastern Railways, had been reinstated …
