Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 5401–5600
Ravi Kumar filed a criminal revision (No. 5578 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of a lower court. The revisionist was represented by counsel Raghuraj Singh, while the State and other respondents were represented by G.A. and Vishal Kumar. At the hearing, the …
The petitioners, Smt. Renu Sharma and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging the dismissal of their suit and the pendency of a civil appeal (No. 73 of 2025). In the civil appeal, an application under Order XLI Rule 27 of the CPC seeking a stay was filed and rejected, and a …
The applicant, Akhand Pratap Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of an FIR and charge sheet registered under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the FIR failed to …
A writ petition under Article 227 was listed as likely infructuous. The petitioner failed to appear before the court to demonstrate that the cause of action still existed. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition as infructuous. The judgment clarified that if the cause of action persists, the …
The revisionists challenged the order of the Additional Sessions Judge dated 29.11.2025, which had set aside their acquittal under Section 498-A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act and convicted them on probation. They contended that an earlier appeal (Criminal Appeal No.49 of 2025, Fateh Singh v. …
Kunwar Divyankar Pratap Singh filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 248 of 2014) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter was listed as a ‘case not to be adjourned’, but the applicant’s counsel did not appear. …
Ankit Saxena and three others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. No counsel appeared for either party on the date of hearing. The sole issue before the court was whether the application should be entertained in the absence …
The petitioner, Sumit Kumar Saxena, challenged a recovery warrant issued against him by filing a criminal revision. He subsequently filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS, which was referred to mediation and successfully concluded. Following the mediation, the petitioner sought to …
The appellants Masroor and Maqsud were convicted under Sections 308 and 34 of the IPC and sentenced to three years of rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the High Court observed that the trial court failed to consider the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and Sections 360 and 361 of the Code of …
Raju @ Rajesh filed Criminal Appeal No. 1583 of 1985 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as recorded in an office report dated 8 September 2026 based on the Chief Judicial Magistrate’s report. The court was required to consider …
The appellants, Shyam Lal and Vijai Singh, filed a criminal appeal against the State of U.P. While the appeal was pending, Vijai Singh died, as reported in an office memo dated 08‑09‑2026. Subsequently, the court learned that Shyam Lal had also died, leading to the conclusion that both appellants …
The appeal was filed by five accused who had been convicted under IPC sections 147, 308 read with 149 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment, with the sentences to run concurrently. Over the years, four of the appellants died, and the fifth, Gulzar Singh, could not be located despite extensive …
The appellant, Ekhlaq, filed a criminal appeal but died on 11 April 2018. The court received an office report confirming his death and noted that no relative filed an application for substitution. Since the appellant was deceased and no substitution was made, the appeal could not proceed. The court …
The appellant Surendra was convicted in a criminal case and filed an appeal before the Allahabad High Court. While the appeal was pending, the Chief Judicial Magistrate reported that Surendra died in 2010. The court considered whether the death of the sole accused extinguishes the pending appeal. It …
Ganga Yadav filed a criminal appeal (No. 2567 of 1988) against the State of Uttar Pradesh in the Allahabad High Court. The appellant's counsel was Haridwar Singh and Janardan Yadav, while the State was represented by the Advocate General. No appearance was made by the appellant, and the State's …
The appellants Ram Kunwar and Ram Kewal were convicted for the murder of Smt. Shanichari and for concealing the offence based on the testimony of the victim's five‑year‑old daughter, Kumari Pramila, and the alleged recovery of a knife. On appeal, the High Court examined the reliability of the …
The appellant, Hira Lal, filed a criminal appeal. An office report dated 17-12-2025, based on a report from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhadoi, confirmed that Hira Lal died on 10-10-2015. The court considered whether the appeal could continue after the appellant's death. It held that the death of …
Narain Das filed a criminal appeal (No. 2136 of 1983) against the State of U.P. No counsel appeared on his behalf. The State was represented by A.G.A. An office report dated 30‑04‑2026 confirmed that the sole appellant, Narain Das, died on 06‑09‑2025. Under established legal principles, the death of …
Smt. Bittan Devi and three others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application. Counsel for the State and the second opposite party were present. The Court observed the …
The applicant, Sitaram, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant sought to withdraw the application, stating it should be dismissed as not pressed. The Additional Government Advocate raised no objection …
United India Insurance Company Ltd. filed a first appeal against an order dated 2005 in a dispute with Dinesh Kumar Gupta and others. The appellant sought relief from the earlier decision of the lower court. The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad examined the pleadings and the record of the …
The appellants claimed compensation for the death of a two‑year‑old child knocked down by a jeep on a national highway. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 2,25,000 based on a notional annual income of Rs 15,000 for the child. The appellants sought a higher award, citing Supreme Court …
National Insurance Company Limited appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs. 2,16,000 granted to Mrs. Babli and others for a 12 October 2002 accident in which the deceased was struck by a tanker. The appellant argued that the driver’s licence was found to be fake, a fact verified by the …
The appellant filed a second appeal which was later sought to be withdrawn through an application supported by an affidavit of the appellant's son, Prem Narayan, who also represented other heirs. The court considered the request to withdraw the appeal. No substantive legal reasoning was detailed, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 62 of 2021, which involved offences under Sections 147, 452, 323 and 506 IPC. The parties had entered into a settlement on 28 July 2025, which was verified and reported to the …
The appellant Oriental Insurance Co. challenged the compensation award granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in favor of the respondents, Suneeta and others, alleging that the tribunal ignored contributory negligence and failed to deduct the family pension and Dying in Harness benefits …
Petitioner Smt Manni Devi filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, through counsel Manvendra Nath Singh, she filed a withdrawal application seeking dismissal of the writ petition. The court examined the affidavit supporting the withdrawal and the counsel's statement, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ramu, who was charged under Sections 74, 75, 76 and 64(1) of the same Act for an alleged rape. The applicant contended that the medico‑legal report did not support the …
Mohammad Rashid filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code that required him to pay Rs.3,000 and Rs.1,000 monthly as maintenance to two claimants. He argued that the trial court fixed the amount without properly ascertaining his actual …
Shubham Maheshwari filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. While the bail application was pending, he filed Habeas Corpus Writ Petition No. 412 of 2026, which the Court allowed, resulting in his release from custody. The applicant’s counsel then moved that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vikas Nishad, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 64 of the B.N.S.S. and 5J(ii)/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual intercourse with a minor. The applicant claimed …
Daveshish Lasker and two others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings. The matter was listed in the revised court list, but no party appeared to press the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The …
The appellant, Shailesh Kumar, filed an application under Section 173(4) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act alleging that his employer used abusive language and withheld wages, seeking criminal investigation. The trial court rejected the application, finding no cognizable offence. …
Mubarak Ali and eight others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The application was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The court …
The appellant Sumit Yadav challenged a charge‑sheet and a summoning order dated 06‑10‑2025 passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge under Section 14A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The FIR alleged that on 23‑06‑2025 the appellant assaulted …
The applicants Vijay Bahadur Singh and another filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 04‑08‑2024 and the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 9556 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 419, 420 and 506 IPC. The applicants did not …
The appellant Raju Yadav and six others were summoned under the SC/ST Act for alleged assault, attempted rape, and caste‑based abuse against a complainant and his minor daughters. The appellant challenged the summoning order, arguing that the complaint did not disclose the essential ingredients of …
The appellant, Mangal Chauhan, died while his criminal appeal was pending before the Allahabad High Court. The court, on 30 July 2026, ordered a living status report from the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Ghaziabad. The magistrate confirmed the appellant's death on 29 August 2026. Consequently, the …
A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 2578 of 2026) was filed by Vipin Singh @ Vippa Parihar against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after a revised call, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court …
Rahul and two others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, presumably to quash a criminal proceeding. The matter was listed in the revised court list, but no party appeared before the court. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The …
Kiran Devi and two others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, presumably to quash criminal proceedings. The matter was listed in the revised court list, but no party appeared before the court. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The court noted that the case was listed but no party appeared to press the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The court dismissed the application on the ground of …
Haresh Yadav and three others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The application was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, but no party pressed the matter when it came up for hearing. The learned …
The appellants Kalam and four others appealed against a summoning order dated 26‑02‑2021 in a complaint (Pappu v. Kalam) that alleged offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 427, 504, 506 and Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST Act. They contended that the matter stemmed from a land dispute, that no …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 30 September 2019 in case crime No. 533 of 2019, which alleged offences under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, 1955. The …
The petitioner, Rajeev Sharma, filed Writ A No. 8515 of 2022 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The petition remained pending since 2022 without any appearance by the petitioner’s counsel. The court issued a notice directing that old cases be taken …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 (No. 4775 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed as likely to be infructuous. No representative of the petitioner appeared to argue that the cause of action still survived. Consequently, the Court dismissed the …
The petitioner, Nand Kishore Gaur, filed Writ A No. 7575 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The petition remained pending since 2019 and the petitioner’s counsel failed to appear for the hearing. The court noted a procedural notice that old …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Shyama Devi, who was arrested in FIR No. 368 of 2025 under several IPC sections for allegedly selling a victim. She claimed innocence, stating the FIR was lodged by the victim herself and that co‑accused Rashid had already been …
Rohit Saini filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the application, the charge against him was altered to Sections 105 and 190 of the Indian Penal Code (BNS). Counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the pending bail …
Petitioner Smt. Radhika Devi filed Writ Petition No. 11423 of 2021 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three others. The petition remained unattended as the petitioner’s counsel did not appear for the hearing. The case was listed under writs likely to have …
The petitioners filed Writ‑A No. 10071 of 2020 in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another respondent. No counsel appeared on the scheduled date and the petition was not marked to indicate that the cause of action still survived. The court, noting a notice that …
The revision petition filed by Ashok Kumar and another was dismissed by the Allahabad High Court as a defective revision for non prosecution. No counsel appeared for either party. The court noted the lack of prosecution and ordered dismissal. The judgment was delivered on September 9, 2026 by …
The High Court considered the bail application of Subhash Babu @ Titu, who was arrested in connection with a alleged demand of Rs.10,000 by co‑accused Raj Kumar and is charged under Sections 7 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The applicant has been in custody since 10 October 2025 and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 16‑10‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 17‑04‑2025, and the entire proceedings in case No. 5174 of 2025 (State v. Jaswant Singh et al.) arising from an alleged …
The applicant filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance and summoning order dated 11 July 2023 in Criminal Case No. 48767 (State v. Kundan & Others), which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant contended that Sections …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 15‑01‑2026 and the cognizance order dated 18‑02‑2026 in a criminal case pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑III, Amroha. The High Court examined the material and observed …
The appellant Mahesh Kumar filed an appeal, but he died before the hearing. No party appeared to seek substitution of his legal heirs. The appellant's counsel argued that the appeal should be abated due to the lack of a representative. The court examined whether the appeal could continue in the …
The appellant Suresh Yadav sought higher compensation for the death of his son Sonu Yadav, who was a pillion rider knocked down by a negligent truck driver lacking a valid licence. The trial Tribunal had awarded Rs.2,66,000 based on a monthly income of Rs.3,000, without accounting for future …
The applicant, Anil Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 16 March 2026 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur, which directed the transfer of a disputed amount from his account to that of the opposite party. The order arose from a criminal …
The Oriental Insurance Co. appealed a tribunal award of Rs.20.40 million granted to the claimant for a fatal scooter accident. The appellant argued that the driver, Roshan Kesarwani, held only a learner's licence and was required to have a qualified licence holder as a pillion rider, which was …
The applicant, Preeti, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 16 March 2026 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur, which directed the transfer of a disputed amount from her account to the second opposite party in a criminal case (Crime No. 221 of …
The petitioner, Vikram Pratap Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others to return Rs.29,42,500 as security deposit and Rs.1,17,700 as stamp paper with 18% interest. The petition had been pending for over 16 years and the State failed to file a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, but failed to appear before the court. No counsel represented the applicants on the revised list, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate and the second opposite party were present. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. Counsel for the applicants informed the court that the dispute between the parties had been settled, rendering the petition moot. The court considered whether the application could proceed in light …
The applicants, Seema Devi and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Sessions Trial No. 758/2021, which involved offences under IPC sections 427, 504, 506, 341 and the SC/ST Act. The parties had reached a full settlement, with the opposite party returning a …
The applicant, Akanksha Chaudhary, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS before the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an order dated 25.3.2026 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Second Hapur in Criminal Revision No. 44 of 2026. That revision arose out of Case Crime No. …
The applicant, Hemant Goyal, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a revision order dated 19‑06‑2024 and a summoning order dated 18‑07‑2025 in a criminal case involving IPC offences 323, 324, 325, 504 and 506. He did not press the merits of the quash relief and instead …
The applicant, Hussain Zaidi, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, summons and the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 265 of 2025) arising from a Section 420 IPC offence. The applicant alleged that the prosecution was instituted mala …
The petitioners, two adult women in a live‑in relationship, approached the Allahabad High Court seeking a permanent injunction directing the State and police not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide them protection against threats from family members. The petition arose after …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties reached an amicable settlement, and a copy of the settlement agreement was placed on record. Both counsel acknowledged the settlement. The court held that, in …
Abhinav Rastogi filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. The appellant's counsel, Vishal Kumar Singh, expressed a desire to withdraw the appeal. The court referred to a Supreme Court order in Deep Dixit & Anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors., which allowed withdrawal of a criminal …
The applicants, Rajeev Tayal and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the matter, while counsel for the State and the second opposite party were present. The court …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 6087 of 2019, which involved offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC. The applicant did not press the merits of the quash petition and instead requested the …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove alleged encroachments on specific Khasra parcels in Ghaziabad and on land belonging to the Nagar Nigam and the Hindon riverbed. The respondents contested the petitioner’s claim, asserting that the photographs and …
The applicants, Smt. Kailashi Devi and two others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Their counsel, Mool Chandra Maurya, later informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the application. The court accepted this request and dismissed the application …
Petitioner Sangeeta Devi filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari, requested permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 13‑11‑2019 and the cognizance order dated 01‑03‑2021 in Criminal Case No. 1585 of 2021 (Crime No. 487 of 2019) which involved offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of …
The applicants, Mukhtiyar and others, filed an application under section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking relief. Their counsel later requested to withdraw the application, seeking liberty to re‑file with better particulars. The Hon'ble Justice Nand Prabha Shukla dismissed the application as withdrawn, …
The applicant, Sanjiv Kumar Singh, filed a contempt petition against the Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Audit Section-1, Government of U.P., alleging non‑compliance with a prior court order dated 12 January 2026. The respondent filed a compliance affidavit, which the court took on record and …
Smt. Vimla Mishra filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking an order for mutation of her property. The respondents, including the State of U.P., filed a compliance affidavit stating that the application for mutation had already been decided by an order dated 03.09.2026, and the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vivek, who is charged with gang rape and related offences under Sections 137(2), 70(2), 351(3), 352, 61(2) of the BNS and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant …
The revisionists filed a criminal revision under Sections 438/442 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) challenging a trial court order that summoned them in a complaint case for offences under Sections 323, 406 and 504 IPC. They argued that the summons violated Article 21(2) of the …
The appellant filed a complaint under Section 156(3) of the CrPC alleging that on 23 November 2023 the accused entered his house, assaulted his family, attempted to molest his wife, and that one accused sustained an injury. The Additional District & Sessions Judge dismissed the complaint, finding no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sumit, who was arrested in a case involving alleged rape of a 17‑year‑old under Sections 70(1), 191(2), 115(2), 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, highlighted a seven‑day delay in …
The revisionists Durga Yadav and others filed a criminal revision under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, challenging the Sessions Judge's order rejecting their discharge application under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code and directing framing of charge …
The petitioner, Lalman, filed a writ petition (Writ C No. 23148 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three others. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The court, upon receiving …
The petitioners, Anil Singh and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Kripa Shanker Pandey, informed the court that the petitioners no longer wished to pursue the writ. The court considered whether a petition can continue when …
The applicant, Sunil Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Case No. 68536 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 386, 420, 506 and 342 of the IPC. The application was filed before the High …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 2 June 2026 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur, which directed the transfer of a disputed amount from the applicants' account to that of the second respondent. The order arose from …
Petitioners Vishal Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they do not wish to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The respondent's counsel and the Attorney General for …
The petitioner, Shakil Ahmad, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 15534 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging his detention. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested. The petitioner expressed his …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested and no longer wished to pursue the writ, seeking to withdraw it. The State’s Additional …
Petitioners Shoeb Ansari Abdullapuriya and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against them. The State of U.P. informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been …
Petitioner Tahir filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After filing, he informed the court that he had already been arrested and no longer wished to pursue the writ, seeking to withdraw it. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the …
The petitioner, Shiv Bhan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against the accused. The State counsel informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been submitted on 21 June …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Govind Yadav, who is accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 98 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 296, 333, 352, 115(2), 109(1), 351(3) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant's counsel argued that he is innocent, has no prior …
Mithilesh Kumar Pandey filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the State and the other respondent did not oppose the withdrawal. The court considered the parties’ …
The petitioner, Akhilesh Yadav alias Bauva, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested and expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The State’s …
The petitioner, Deshraj Kushwaha, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested and no longer wished to pursue the writ, seeking to withdraw it. The State’s …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 07.08.2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and both the State and the second …
The applicants, Noorul Hasan and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicants submitted that the application had become infructuous. The court considered the submission and found no merit in proceeding with the application. …
The applicants, Mohit Arora and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 06‑07‑2025 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 10188 of 2026) arising from alleged offences under Sections 406 and 506 IPC. The parties …
Petitioners Ankit and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The State and the third respondent, represented by their counsel, raised no objection to the …
Petitioner Ashish Chauhan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The State's Additional Government Advocate and the counsel for the fourth respondent raised no objection …
Petitioners Waheed and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against them. The State informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 09.02.2026. Petitioners did not contest these facts …
Ram Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conclude the investigation of an FIR dated 12-06-2025 under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. The petitioner alleged that the investigation was not being conducted in a fair and impartial manner. …
Petitioners Surender and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation was already completed and a charge-sheet …
Ramcharan @ Kuddan was arrested and subsequently filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS No. 6670 of 2026). The applicant's counsel informed the court that the applicant had already been taken into custody, rendering the anticipatory bail …
Petitioners Banvari Lal and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The State's Additional Government Advocate and the counsel for respondent No.3 raised no …
The petitioners, Kunvar Pal and others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The respondents, the State of UP and others, indicated that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 17-08-2026. The petitioners did not contest this fact …
Ankit Kumar filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 16109 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Shri Vageesh Pandey, announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The learned Additional Government …
The petitioner, Rahul Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against him. The State informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 07-06-2026. The petitioner did not contest these facts …
The petitioner, Rahat Ali, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against him. The State indicated that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 08-07-2026. The petitioner did not contest these facts but expressed …
The petitioner, Jaykesh Nishad, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain aspects of the investigation, wherein additional serious sections were added. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel acknowledged the facts but expressed a desire to …
Petitioners Neetu Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The State's Additional Government Advocate and the counsel for the fourth respondent raised no …
The petitioners, Ebadur Rehman Khan and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging aspects of the investigation by the State of Uttar Pradesh. During the hearing, the Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that additional sections had …
The petitioner, Jagannath, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The State of Uttar Pradesh informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge‑sheet had been filed against the accused. The petitioner did not contest this fact but expressed a …
Kharpattu Chauhan was arrested in connection with Crime No. 0411 of 2025 under Section 316(5) BNS and filed a bail application claiming innocence and alleging false implication. The applicant offered to pay Rs. 3,46,009.57 to the informant within two months after release. The State opposed the bail …
Karan Chauhan filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 26722 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel expressed an intention to withdraw the bail application. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against them. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the investigation had been completed, a charge‑sheet had been filed, and the magistrate had taken cognizance of the offence. …
The petitioners, Masood Hasan and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge sheet filed against them by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 16707 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and seek liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The Additional Government …
Saleem Khan filed a criminal revision petition (No. 4020 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was presented by counsel Shiv Kumar Kesari. During the hearing, counsel submitted that subsequent developments had rendered the petition …
Arun Kumar Sinha, the revisionist, was acquitted by the trial court in a criminal matter. He filed Criminal Revision No. 3852 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court, seeking dismissal of the revision on the ground that the matter had become infructuous. The learned Additional Government Advocate …
The petitioner, Subhawati Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation in a case where a final report had already been submitted in favor of the accused. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the …
The petitioners, Tanuj Verma and Shakti, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested and therefore no …
The appellant, Gautam Sharma, filed a criminal appeal (No. 7405 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, a report dated 08 September 2026 indicated that the appellant had died while undergoing treatment. The court, upon receiving this information, considered …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings (S.T.No. 1677 of 2022) relating to offences under Sections 363 and 366 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement and a compromise was verified by the trial court on …
The petitioner, Shankar Lal, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Soraon to decide a pending restoration application filed on 4 February 2022. The restoration application pertained to an earlier case (Computer case No. T202002030308201 of 2019) …
Petitioners Disha Katiyar and her partner, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of U.P. and private respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from family members. The petitioners submitted …
The petitioners Aradhna Yadav and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition was filed under Section 137(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The respondents argued that the same matter had already …
The petitioner Jiyalal filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus order to set aside a notice (R.C. No. 22 dated 29.04.2022) and to prevent interference in his peaceful possession of a plot of land (Arazi no. 596) in Kasaujha, Prayagraj. The petition alleged that the respondents, including the State …
The High Court entertained a habeas corpus petition filed by Annu Rani and another seeking the release of the corpus, Anu Rani, from alleged confinement by her parents. Upon personal interaction, the corpus, a 26‑year‑old educated nurse, asserted her desire to live independently and not reside with …
The petitioner, Komal, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Rudhauli Tehsil to enforce an order passed under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 for demolition of an illegal construction, and also directing the Collector to …
Mantosh Yadav applied for bail in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that the charges stem from police rivalry and that he is not a gang member. He had already been granted bail in two other criminal matters, as …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The State’s Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, having …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 BNSS seeking a direction that the trial court expedite the disposal of Criminal Case No. 471 of 2014, which involves offences under Sections 354, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant argued that the case, pending since 2014, should be decided within a …
The applicant Mahesh Kumar Bhardwaj filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking quash of the charge sheet and the pending criminal trial (Session Trial No. 53 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 74, 75(1)(i) of the B.N.S. Act and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act. …
The applicant, Raj Bahadur Bind, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the judgment and orders in a criminal revision and a criminal case involving allegations of domestic violence under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration) of Varanasi Division to decide an appeal (computerized case no. C202514000000543) pending under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The appeal, arising from a suit for division of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 4‑April‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 371 of 2026, which arose from an FIR dated 14‑Sept‑2025 alleging offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 3(5) of …
The petitioners, Ajay Kumar Upadhyay and two others, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 28051 of 2026) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petition was heard before Hon'ble Justice Chandra Kumar Rai. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash a Special Judge's order that affirmed a Judicial Magistrate's dismissal of a Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. application. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw …
The petitioners, beneficiaries of an order dated 2 April 2026 issued by the Prescribed Authority under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, sought enforcement of a recovery certificate that the Authority had directed the District Magistrate of Gautam Budh Nagar to issue on 30 June 2026. Despite the …
Rohit Kumar filed an application before the Allahabad High Court under Section 528 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant’s counsel, Ankit Srivastava and Ch. Dil Nisar, failed to appear despite a revised call. Only the learned brief holder for the State, Shri Puspraj Singh, was present. …
Petitioner Akash Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the respondents, including the State, raised no objection. The court considered the petitioner's request and the …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Nishad, filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the District Magistrate of Gautam Buddh Nagar to comply with a recovery certificate dated 06‑06‑2025 issued by another respondent. The respondent District Magistrate assured the court of prompt compliance. …
The petitioners, Malkeet Singh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings against them. The State informed the Court that the investigation had been completed and a charge‑sheet was filed on 06‑07‑2026. The petitioners did …
The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita filed by Pappu @ Ram Achal Verma and others seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 389 of 2025) arising from alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 351(3) and …
Petitioner Jaykishan Rana filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18189 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The Additional Government Advocate for the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Karan Biyaar, who was charged under Sections 87, 137(2), 64(1) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual harassment of a minor girl aged 16 …
The petitioner, Ashim Kumar Samanto, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The respondent's counsel raised no objection to …
The petitioner, Abhay Chauhan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings against him. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 25-04-2026. The petitioner did not contest these …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sajan @ Deepak Lodhi, who was arrested in a case involving alleged rape of a 16‑year‑old girl under the POCSO Act, as well as offences under the BNS Act, SC/ST Act and the IT Act. The applicant argued that the victim was a consenting …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The learned Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, after noting the …
Petitioners Suraj Patel and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and seek liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The State’s Additional …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued on 16‑07‑2026 in Session Trial No. 1244 of 2026, which arose from Criminal Case No. 364 of 2018 (IPC §§ 420, 448). The applicant contended that he …
The applicant, Sanno, was arrested in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 357 of 2026) involving IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 352 and 333. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing out a material contradiction between the FIR, which attributes the injury …
Petitioner Smt. Geeta filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that she had already been arrested and no longer wished to pursue the writ, seeking to withdraw it. The Additional Government Advocate for …
The petitioner, Pratham Kumar, filed writ petition No. 35536 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ petition. The respondent State of U.P. and another …
Rahul was arrested in a case involving alleged sexual offences against a 16‑year‑old girl. The FIR alleged he enticed the minor and faced charges under sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(M), 352, 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. Rahul contended that the …
Petitioner Mahipal Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Najibabad to decide a pending suit (No.5406 of 2024) concerning division of holding. The petitioner alleged that the suit had been pending since 21‑Dec‑2024 without expeditious progress, as …
The petitioners, Abhishek Sharma and six others, filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Amit Kumar Pandey, requested permission to withdraw the petition. The court granted the request, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive issues were …
Neetu Devi filed a writ petition seeking a corrected date of birth certificate after the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate ordered issuance upon payment of a late fee. The Block Development Officer refused to accept the fee and issue the certificate. The High Court examined the magistrate's order and the …
Petitioners Ruma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The second petitioner was subsequently arrested and the petitioners expressed their intention to withdraw the writ. The State and the fourth respondent did not object to the withdrawal. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhure Urf Mohammad Hasan, accused under Sections 87, 70(2), 127(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 5(G) and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged gang rape of a 17‑year‑old girl. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged after a seven‑month delay, that …
The High Court entertained a habeas corpus petition filed by the State of U.P. seeking custody of Riya, a girl who claimed to have attained majority and had voluntarily married Tinku. The court examined Riya, who stated she is 18 years old, educated up to class IX, and wishes to reside with her …
The applicants, Nadeem Khan and another, were given a two‑week extension on 13 May 2025 to file a rejoinder affidavit in an application under Section 528 of the BNSS. They failed to file the affidavit despite seeking leave on 26 May 2026 due to personal difficulty, and the matter was adjourned for …
Ankit Raj filed a writ petition against Indian Oil Corporation Limited and two others, seeking relief. The petitioner later obtained a No Objection Certificate and completed the dealership, rendering the petition moot. He requested the court to dismiss the petition and allow him to file a fresh …
The petitioner, a complainant under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005, filed a writ petition seeking expeditious completion of an inquiry that had been ordered but remained pending. The petition cited a letter dated 31‑12‑2025 from the Chief Development Officer, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Surendra Kumar, who was arrested in a case (Crime No. 183 of 2026) under Sections 308(5), 308(6) of the IPC and Section 61(2) of the CrPC for alleged extortion. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming false implication and lack of cogent …
The petitioner, Kanti Devi, filed a writ petition seeking payment of salary for the post of Headmaster at Uchh Prathmik Vidyalaya, Semari, alleging that she was promoted by order dated 03.07.2015 and had been functioning in that capacity but had not received salary. The respondents, including the …
Petitioner Prashant filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to produce CCTV footage from a police station for specific dates. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested to withdraw the petition, seeking liberty to pursue other remedies. The …
The applicant, M/s Tyagi Enterprises, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite a pending criminal complaint (Case No. 879 of 2022) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether it could …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajveer Singh, a former Revenue Inspector, who was arrested in connection with a land‑lease fraud case (Criminal No. 156 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B and 34 of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, …
Mahesh Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petitioners were represented by counsel Anees Ahmad, while the State was represented by G.A. The petitioners failed to appear in …
The petitioners sought to quash an FIR dated 19‑04‑2026 filed under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 72 of 2026, Meerut. They prayed that before any arrest the police be directed to follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. The State opposed the merits …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Saleem, who was arrested under Sections 69 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. for an alleged offence involving a major divorced woman. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that there was no incriminating material, and that …
The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Respondent No. 2 to consider his representation dated 08.02.2023 and subsequent reminders, to stay an order of Respondent No. 3 dated 08.07.2026, and to allow him to continue working at the Puranpur branch due to …
Petitioners Subash Prajapati and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 15-11-2025, registered under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code, and a direction that they not be arrested. The State opposed the petition and informed …
Nasir Husain and ten others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petitioners failed to appear before the court even after a revised call, while the respondent's Additional Government Advocate …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 10806 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court examined the material and held that, on the …
The petitioner, Mohammad Rafi, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 19462 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and three others. The petition was listed for hearing and a revised call was made, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. …
The applicants, Smt Savitri Devi and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance order dated 13‑07‑2022 and the charge sheet dated 22‑12‑2021 in Crime No. 591 of 2021, which alleged offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 352 and 324 of the Indian …
The petitioner, Sovindra, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 19526 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Hemant Sharma, prayed for leave to withdraw the petition, seeking liberty to pursue any other appropriate remedy. The State of U.P., …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 7571 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 110 of the B.N.S. for which a charge‑sheet had already been filed. The applicants argued that they …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash an FIR dated 26.05.2026 that alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 324(2) of the B.N.S. The State argued that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had already been filed on …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sagar, accused under Sections 65(1) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a 13‑year‑old girl. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictions in the victim's statements, …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad listed Amendment Application No. 3 of 2026 along with previous papers in Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 19341 of 2026 filed by Taksham Malik and others against the State of U.P. and others. The order was dated 9 September 2026 and signed by Judges …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Naveen, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 74, 351(2), 65(1) of the IPC and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. Naveen argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictions in the victim's statements, …
Petitioner Dheeraj Pathak filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Prayagraj, to decide his pending divorce case (Matrimonial Case No.1155 of 2025) expeditiously. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had been pending since …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sachin @ Golu, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual intercourse with a minor girl aged about 15 years. The applicant claimed …
The High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed on behalf of Shahrukh, who is accused of rape under Sections 64(1) and 351(3) BNS. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, the FIR was lodged three days after the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite the disposal of a pending criminal case (Case No. 78342/2021) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant argued that the case, filed on …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dharmendra, accused in Crime No. 141 of 2026 for alleged gang rape of a 14‑year‑old girl under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The applicant claimed false implication, lack of incriminating material, delay in filing the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a court order directing the Family Court, Mau, to decide a pending maintenance case (No. 654 of 2025) within a fixed time. The respondents did not object, provided the lower court was not overloaded. The High Court referred to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vishwanath Gaund, who was arrested in a case involving alleged gang rape, false promise of marriage, and administration of poison to a minor girl, charged under several sections of the BNS Act and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s …
The applicant, Rekha Devi, filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction that the lower court expedite the disposal of a pending case (Case No. 1235 of 2024). The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection, but the High Court examined precedent that …
