Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 5601–5800

ANIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Anil Kumar, who was arrested in a rape case (Criminal No. 277 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 70(1), 331(4) and 351(3) of the same Act. The applicant argued …

MOHD ISLAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Mohd Islam and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 23 July 2026 under Section 420 IPC. They prayed that before any arrest, the police should adhere to the Supreme Court's guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar …

ARUNversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Arun filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his detention. During the hearing, counsel informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested and placed in jail, rendering the petition moot. The State's Additional Government Advocate and the private respondent …

SHAHRUKHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shahrukh, who was arrested in a rape case (Criminal Case No. 193 of 2026) under Sections 87, 69 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that the victim, a major married woman, had consented and that the medico‑legal …

MOHD ASIFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohd Asif, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 20‑06‑2026 under Sections 316(2) and 351(3) of the B.N.S.S. and to obtain a direction that the police not arrest him. The petitioner also requested that any arrest follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh …

RAJ KUMAR YADAV AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The revisionists challenged the Additional Session Judge’s order rejecting their discharge application under Section 308 of the IPC, arguing that the evidence did not show any intention to cause death and that the injuries were simple. The State contended that the assault caused serious injuries, …

ASHA JYOTSNAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The applicant, Asha Jyotsna, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Mainpuri, dispose of a pending criminal case (State vs Vimal Kumar) within a fixed time. The applicant argued that the trial was unduly delayed, …

TABANK ANSARI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Tabank Ansari and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 24 June 2026, registered under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and to restrain their arrest. They also prayed that the police adhere to the Supreme Court …

BADALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Badal filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The court noted the counsel's statement and proceeded to dismiss the application as …

RAJ @ PRIYANSHUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raj @ Priyanshu, accused under Sections 137(2), 65(1) of the Evidence Act and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a 13-year‑10‑month‑old girl. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the victim’s statement …

VIRENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Virendra Singh filed Writ Petition No. 33196 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. During the hearing, counsel Ms. Pritika Tiwari, appearing on behalf of advocate Shailendra, informed the Court that the petitioner no …

GULNAZ BANOversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The applicant, Gulnaz Bano, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a court order directing the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Kanpur to decide a pending complaint under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act filed in 2018. The applicant argued that the case had been …

SHANTIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shanti, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a court order directing the trial court to decide a pending Domestic Violence Act (Section 12) application within a fixed time. The High Court examined whether it could impose a time‑bound schedule for disposal of the …

RAJATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Rajat was arrested in connection with Crime No. 506 of 2025, charged under sections 137(2), 87, 65(1), 351(2) of the B.N.S. and sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor girl aged 15‑16. The applicant contended that the victim had consented, that the medical report did not support …

BRIJESH KUMAR TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a court order directing the trial court to dispose of a pending Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint within a fixed time. The applicant argued that the case, filed on 04‑06‑2025, remained undecided and required a …

RAMESH RAJPUT AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Ramesh Rajput and two others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 19468 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating they would pursue an appropriate remedy elsewhere. The State's counsel, …

FARHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Farhan in a criminal case (Crime No. 342 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 61(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior criminal …

SHYAM PRAKASH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 17-11-2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 16-10-2025, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 14265 of 2025 relating to offences under Sections 127(2), 115(2), 352 …

MOHD AZAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered bail application No.28499 of 2026 filed by Mohd Azam, who is accused in a criminal case (Crime No.104 of 2026) under several IPC sections including 61(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 351(2). The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, …

MEHULversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 26.05.2026 and a direction restraining the respondent from arresting him. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge sheet had already been filed on …

SANJEEV KUMAR AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant, Sanjeev Kumar and others, filed a civil miscellaneous review application before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Vivek Prakash Mishra, informed the court that the applicant no longer wishes to pursue the review and requested its dismissal as not pressed. The court …

SMT. AFSHA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Afsha and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere in their marital relationship and to provide them protection. The respondents contended that petitioner No. 2 was already married to another woman and had contracted a second …

VIRENDRA PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Virendra Pratap Singh filed a writ petition seeking a directive to the State of Uttar Pradesh to consider his application dated 14 November 2025 for an arms license under the sports quota. The petitioner argued that his application was in proper format with requisite documents. The …

AMIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Amit Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of U.P. to consider his application dated 04‑11‑2022 for an arms licence under the sports quota. The petitioner argued that the application was in proper format with all requisite documents. The respondent's standing …

RAHUL RAGHUVANSHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Rahul Raghuvanshi filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the second respondent to consider his application dated 09.01.2025 for an arms license for sports purposes. The petitioner argued that the application was filed in the proper format with requisite documents. The standing …

RAJABABUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajababu, who was arrested in a rape case (Criminal No. 225 of 2026) under sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, citing lack of incriminating material, an inconsistent victim statement, and …

AKSHAYversusSTATE OF U.P.

Akshay was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and has been in custody since 17 January 2026. He filed a second bail application, arguing that the charge sheet was filed on 13 April 2026 and charges were framed on 8 July 2026, and that co‑accused …

SEEMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Seema filed a criminal revision under Section 125 CrPC seeking maintenance from Mukesh Soni, alleging that she is his lawful wife. The trial court had rejected her claim, holding that her earlier marriage was still subsisting and therefore her subsequent marriage to Mukesh Soni was void. Seema …

RAJMANI @ BHOLA PANDEY AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the order of the Additional Sessions Judge that dismissed their discharge application in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 323 and 326 of the IPC. The order being …

MAHARAJ KUMARI VISHNUPRIYAversusMAHARAJ KUMARI HARPRIYA AND 2 OTHERS

Maharaj Kumari Vishnupriya filed a suit for injunction, partition and declaration concerning five properties and sought a temporary injunction, which the trial court dismissed. She appealed that dismissal, and the High Court, on 14 July 2026, observed that the plaintiff's injunction application was …

VIPUL KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Vipul Kumar Singh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Commissioner of Police, Prayagraj, to decide his pending application for a character certificate. The State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents contended that the matter could be considered by the …

YASMIN SULTANAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

Yasmin Sultana filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the Union of India and two other respondents. The petitioner sought relief on grounds that were not specified in the brief judgment. Counsel for the petitioner, Vikas Pal and Vinod Kumar Maurya, argued …

MOOSAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Moosa, filed a bail application in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that the charges were based on a single criminal incident already resulting in his earlier bail and that he was falsely implicated …

RATNESH KUMAR GAUTAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ratnesh Kumar Gautam, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Civil Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and noted that the applicant had …

MUNSHADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Munshad, who is charged with rape under Sections 64(1) and 351(2) BNS. The applicant contended that the FIR was lodged after a delay of one and a half years, the victim, a …

M/S AZHARI BRICK WORKSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

M/S Azhari Brick Works filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate to consider its representation dated 16 July 2026 and to protect it from dispossession of its brick kiln. The petition alleged a breach of agreement with a private respondent …

RAJKUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the CrPC seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite the disposal of State vs. Yogendra Nishad (S.T. No. 1261 of 2024), a case involving offences under IPC sections 376(3) and 328 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4(2). The State's Additional …

GAURI SHANKAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner Gauri Shankar Sharma filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the dismissal of his complaint under Section 203 of the Criminal Procedure Code by a Judicial Magistrate. The High Court noted that revision against a magistrate’s order is concurrently within the …

VEEKESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Veekesh filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The respondents were the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. Counsel for the applicant were Arvind Agrawal and Ritik Kumar Mishra, while G.A. …

DIWAS KASANAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners Diwas Kasana and Ravindra Shivamani filed writ petitions seeking a direction to implement an order dated 29 January 2026 of the Uttar Pradesh Board of Revenue, issued under Section 80 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. They claimed that the required fee under sub‑section (9) of Section …

SMT DAMINI CORPUS AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court examined a habeas corpus petition filed by the State seeking to produce the corpus, Smt. Damini, before the court and determine her age. Medical evidence and the court's own interaction established that Damini is about 18 years old, having attained majority. She voluntarily …

KULDEEP BAGHELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Kuldeep Baghel, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 19243 of 2022) and the accompanying charge sheet and cognizance order relating to offences under Sections 323, 324, 352, 506 and 308 of the IPC. The High Court …

PRAVIN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Pravin Singh filed an appeal under Section 56 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, together with a stay application, alleging that the stay application had not been decided. The petitioner sought expeditious consideration of the stay. The High Court noted the delay and, without deciding the …

INDU DEVIversusPRAMOD KUMAR AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the expeditious disposal of a civil appeal (No. 43 of 2025) that was pending after a decree against the defendants. The court noted that the petition had no substantive purpose if the appeal remained pending and therefore disposed of the …

ABHIMANYU YADAV AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Abhimanyu Yadav and four others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 20040 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave of the Court to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue any other appropriate remedy. The …

NICKYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Nicky, accused under Sections 351(3), 352, 64(2)Da and 333 of the B.N.S. for alleged sexual exploitation of a married woman. The applicant claimed false implication, citing contradictions in the victim's statements under Sections 180 …

KANHAIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kanhaiya, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 138 of 2026 under several sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing out the absence of a rape allegation in the FIR and the …

SMT SONAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant, Smt. Sonam, filed an application under Section 529 CrPC seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite a domestic‑violence complaint (Case No. 3090 of 2024) and an interim‑maintenance application filed under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence …

SUHAIL KHAN @ CHOTTUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Suhail Khan, who was arrested in a case involving alleged forced conversion of a 19‑year‑old woman and alleged offences under the Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of …

MAHENDRA SINGH DHANGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mahendra Singh Dhangar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel Rajesh Kumar Pandey, expressed that he no longer wished to pursue the writ and preferred to seek any other appropriate legal remedy. The petitioner …

MD OQAIS AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Md Oqais Ahmad, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 26-07-2026 that alleged offences under sections 318(4), 61(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and later limited the relief to protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha …

NARESH PRASAD JAISWALversusCHHOTE LAL

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge in Varanasi to decide a civil suit (Case No. 67/2021) expeditiously. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which cautioned …

ARCHANA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Archana Devi under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case (Crime No. 177 of 2026) where she was alleged to have threatened an informant. The applicant argued that she was falsely implicated, had no role …

ARCHANA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Archana and another filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, the State of U.P. and three others, from interfering in their live‑in relationship and requesting police protection. The petition was supported only by a single affidavit and lacked a …

HASHMAT HUSAINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hashmat Husain, who was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 305 of 2026) under IPC sections 308(2), 336(3) and 338. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, asserted that he was not named in the FIR, and highlighted his poor economic status …

NITESH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 in a criminal case (No. 420 of 2024) alleging offences under IPC Sections 420 and 406. The State’s Additional Government Advocate argued that anticipatory bail was not maintainable because the alleged offences did not …

GAJENDRA AND 21 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 7188 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 191(2), 117 and 118(1) of the same Act. They argued that they had not been arrested …

JITENDRA KUMAR @ GUDDUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Jitendra Kumar, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite a criminal case pending since 2003. The applicant argued that the matter had remained undecided for an inordinate period and requested a time‑bound schedule …

RAJUversusSTATE OF U.P.

Raju applied for bail in a NDPS case (Crime No.110 of 2026) charged under Sections 8 and 21 of the NDPS Act. The High Court considered the facts, the lack of prior criminal record, and noted that a similarly situated co‑accused, Vivek, had already been granted bail. Counsel for both sides were …

SHAYAM LOHIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shayam Lohiya filed an application under Section 529 of the CrPC before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction that the trial court expedite the pending criminal case (No. 1192 of 2020) involving offences under the IPC, the Public Property Damage Prevention Act and the Criminal Law Amendment …

DHRUVCHAND KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Dhruvchand Kushwaha, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite a 2015 complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act pending before the Civil Judge, Gorakhpur. The applicant argued that the case had …

KAVITAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Kavita filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others seeking relief, likely a monetary payment. The respondents submitted a compliance affidavit confirming that the required payment had already been made to the petitioner, which the petitioner’s counsel …

TAMEEM AKHTARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

An application was filed before the Allahabad High Court under Section 529 of the BNSS by the applicant, Tameem Akhtar. The applicant, through counsel Ajay Vikram Singh, expressed a desire not to pursue the application and requested its withdrawal. The State of U.P., represented by G.A., raised no …

RAM KUMAR GAURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ram Kumar Gaur, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 25‑09‑2018 in State vs Ram Kumar Gaur (Case No. 2391/1995) and to stay the pending criminal proceeding (Case Crime No. 693D of 1992) under Section 420 IPC. The High …

HARISHANKAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the CrPC seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite a criminal case (Case No. 3404 of 2009) that has been pending for many years. They argued that the matter required a time‑bound disposal. The State opposed, and the court considered …

SMT RATI SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt Rati Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the Family Court in Mirzapur decide her pending maintenance case (Case No. 617 of 2025) and an interim maintenance application filed under Section 144 of the BNSS on a time‑bound …

SHIV SHANKAR CHAUDHARY AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the proceedings in Criminal Case No. 204 of 2026. The High Court examined the material and observed that, at the pleading stage, it could not be said that no offence was made …

RAJESH AGARWAL @ BABLU AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Rajesh Agarwal @ Bablu and two others, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 8656 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Sanjay Srivastava, subsequently informed the court that the …

ANIL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 5946 of 2025) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Azamgarh, arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The …

MANOJ RAI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a summoning order dated 09.10.2024 and to stay the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 26698 of 2024, which involved charges under Sections 3(5), 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. The High Court examined …

KAILASH AND 3 OTHERSversusSMT. FARHA NAAZ

The applicants filed a contempt application alleging that the Fast Track Court, Junior Division, Bareilly willfully violated an order dated 20 January 2026, which directed the court to decide an interim injunction application expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks. The order, issued by the …

SMT ANJANA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Smt Anjana Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the CrPC seeking a court order directing the trial court to expedite a pending criminal case (Case No. 7448 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 354, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …

AARIFversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate’s Court in Muzaffarnagar expedite the trial of State vs. Bhoora (Case No. 2509/9 of 2018), which involves offences under the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter …

CHAUDHARY FATEH SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Chaudhary Fateh Singh and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 575 of 2019) initiated under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. They contended that the FIR contained false allegations and that, …

SIRAJDHWAJ AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashing of a charge‑sheet dated 24‑12‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 02‑06‑2026 in Criminal Case No.70/IX/2026. They contended that the offences alleged—Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the BNSS—are non‑cognizable and …

ASHA AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Asha and nine others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 27‑01‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 01‑04‑2026, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 201 of 2026. The High Court examined the FIR, the …

DHARMENDRA KUMAR SAINIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Dharmendra Kumar Saini, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 13‑10‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 11‑12‑2024 in a case pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar. The …

HARSH PATEL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Harsh Patel and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance and summoning order dated 06‑07‑2024 in a criminal case (No. 55342 of 2024) that alleged offences under Sections 420, 406 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. They …

RAMLAKHAN NISHADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramlakhan Nishad, who was charged under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act for alleged gang rape of a 14‑year‑old girl. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was lodged five days after …

KISHAN CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P.

Kishan Chaudhary filed an application under Section 529 of the CrPC seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite criminal case No. 973 of 2024 (State vs. Virendra Singh) involving offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The State opposed the direction only if the lower …

SANDEEP @ BALLUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sandeep (Ballu) in a case involving alleged kidnapping, abduction and rape of a minor under IPC sections 363, 366, 376(3) and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4(2). The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictions in the …

ALOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner Alok Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a mandamus directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Saidpur, Ghazipur to expedite the hearing and dispose of Original Suit No. 71 of 2024 within a stipulated period. The High Court examined the authority of a …

JAWAHIR YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 26‑12‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 11‑05‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 158 of 2025, alleging that the offences under Sections 352 and 351(3) BNSS are non‑cognizable. They contended …

OMPRAKASH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 20‑03‑2023 and a cognizance/summoning order dated 05‑06‑2023 in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 323 and 504 of the IPC. The applicant contended that these …

AWADH KISHOR JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Awadh Kishor Jaiswal filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others to pay his salary arrears from July 2003 to his retirement and to compel the second respondent to decide his representation. The Court observed that the grievance regarding salary arrears is more …

NOOR MOHAMMAD @ NOOR @ NOORA MALIKversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered the bail application of Noor Mohammad, who was arrested in connection with Criminal Case No. 599 of 2025 under IPC sections 340(2), 336(3), 338, 318(4), 319(2) and 61(2). The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, that the alleged firm was registered in the name of …

PRADEEP KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Pradeep Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 13‑09‑2021 in a case where he was charged under Sections 406, 420 and 506 IPC. The applicant argued that Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 …

ABHIJEET GAUTAM @ AMIT GAUTAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 04‑04‑2026 in a criminal case that alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 452, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. They contended that Sections 406 …

MD. BABUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Md. Babu, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case (Crime No.259 of 2016) filed under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. He feared arrest and sought interim protection to appear before the trial …

JIYALALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Jiyalal filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to set aside an eviction and damages order dated 18‑June‑2026 passed by the Tehsildar of Handia and to restrain the respondents from interfering with his possession of a disputed plot until the petition is decided. He also requested …

VISHNUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Vishnu was arrested in a case under sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S. and sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a minor girl. The victim, aged between 14 and 17 years as per conflicting documents, stated that no physical relationship existed with the accused and refused a …

NEERAJ JAISWAL @ SUMANT JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Neeraj Jaiswal, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) after having already been granted regular bail by the trial court. The applicant's counsel argued that the anticipatory bail petition had become redundant and should be …

RAKESH KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 21‑06‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 13‑01‑2026 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 117(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 333 of the IPC. The High Court …

AFSARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Afsar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC fearing arrest in a case (Crime No.144 of 2026) involving offences under various sections of the B.N.S. He argued that he was falsely implicated as his name does not appear in the FIR or injured witnesses' …

MOHAMMAD NASIM AKHTARversusJOYA HASAN

The petitioner sought a direction under Article 227 for the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Gorakhpur to decide a specific relief suit (Writ No. 1312 of 2024) within a time‑bound schedule, invoking Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High …

SHIKHAR JAINversusPRIYANKA JAISWAL

Shikhar Jain filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Gorakhpur, to decide his pending divorce petition (Petition No. 170 of 2026) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act expeditiously. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition …

SAMEERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sameer, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 502 of 2026) under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and is not a gang member. He had already been …

JAY JAY RAM ALIAS SANJAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Special Judge (DAA), Kanpur Dehat, in a 2001 criminal case. The applicant contended that he was on bail when the NBW was issued and that the …

NAVEEN KUMAR BHATI ALIAS NAVEEN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an application under Section 528 CrPC filed by Naveen Kumar seeking quashing of the cognizance and summoning order dated 30 March 2022 in State v. Naveen Kumar (Case No.1520 of 2022) arising from a crime under Sections 323 and 504 IPC. The applicant contended …

VIVEKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHER

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction for the appointment of an Orthopedic Surgeon at Government United Hospital, Sikandrabad, a post vacant for over a year, and also sought reinstatement of Dr. Pradeep Sharma. The court noted that the petition appeared to be …

AASIMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Aasim, who was arrested in Crime No. 501 of 2025 for alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code relating to a forged sale deed. The applicant, represented by Senior Advocate N.I. Jafari and …

RAHUL ALIAS PREM SHANKARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rahul alias Prem Shankar, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC s.482 in connection with charges under IPC sections 74, 115(2), 351(2), 352 and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in case No. 766 of 2025. The learned Additional Government Advocate argued that the …

SMT POOJA CHAUHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petition sought a writ of habeas corpus to compel the State to produce Pooja Chauhan and order her custody to Durgesh Kumar, who claimed they were married on 15 March 2022. The court interacted with the corpus, a 23‑year‑old LL.B. student, who categorically denied any marriage or relationship …

MOHD IFTAKHAR ALIversusISHARAT KHATOON AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging a remand order issued by the High Court. The underlying dispute involved an eviction suit filed by the petitioner against the respondents. During the suit, the respondents moved an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC, …

VIRENDRA SINGHversusSMT KUSUM LATA AND 32 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division)/F.T.C. Aligarh to decide an application filed on 21.11.2018 under Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code, which was pending in Original Suit No. 389 of 2015. The petition alleged that the …

SMT. MEERAversusBALCHANDRA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Meera, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging a temporary injunction granted by the trial court in a suit filed by the respondents, Balchandra and another. The petitioner sought relief from the High Court, but the court noted that the appropriate …

MUVIN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Muvin Khan, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to set aside the cognizance order dated 14‑08‑2023 and to quash the charge sheet filed on 18‑04‑2023 in a case of alleged electricity theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act (Amendment) 2003. The …

GANESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ganesh Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the B.N.S. in a case alleging assault under Sections 109, 115(2), 351(3) and 3(5). He claimed he was falsely implicated, stating that the FIR was lodged by the injured party who named him and two others, and …

MOHD. FAIZIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Mohd Faizi filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order of Rs 7,000 per month dated 30‑07‑2026, issued by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Muzaffarnagar, in a case under Section 144 of the B.N.S.S. and Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He argued …

RAJUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Raju applied for bail in a NDNDPS case (Crime No. 549 of 2026) where 421.46 grams of charas was allegedly recovered. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false recovery and that the quantity was below commercial threshold, and argued that mandatory provisions of Sections 50 and …

RAJNISH KUMAR @ DR RAJNISH KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajnish Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared on the revised call, though the State's counsel was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and held that the petition was not being prosecuted. Consequently, …

DINESH CHANDRA @ DINESH KUMAR SARSWATversusKOMAL SINGH AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dinesh Chandra Sarswat, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Hathras to decide his original suit (No. 197 of 2006) on a day‑to‑day basis. The petition relied on the urgency of the matter and requested the High Court to …

RAMESHCHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rameshchandra, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed he was falsely implicated and that the only case shown against him in the …

KIRAN DEVI VERMAversusKAMAL CHANDRA MISHRA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kiran Devi Verma, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the expeditious disposal of Civil Revision No. 173 of 2024, which had been filed after an application under Order I Rule 10 CPC was allowed to implead her as a defendant. The petition contained no other relief and did …

DURVIJAY AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants Durvijay and seven others filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising from offences under Sections 498‑A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that they had reached an amicable …

RAMLALversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ramlal, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking direction for the expeditious disposal of a second appeal filed under Section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. The petition alleged that the second appeal remained pending without a decision. The …

DHARMVEER SINGHversusBALVEER SINGH AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dharmveer Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Hawali, Aligarh, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (7‑C) in Suit No. 526 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained …

POOJA YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court examined …

PIYUSH GAUTAMversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Piyush Gautam, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India and other respondents to appoint him on compassionate grounds under the 1998-2003 scheme, following the death of his father, a Branch Manager, in service on 9 June 2021. He alleged that despite …

KHAJAN SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Khajan Singh and another, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 06‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 420 and 120B of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and later limited their relief to protection under Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. …

RAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Singh, approached the Permanent Lok Adalat for dispute resolution, but the matter was already pending before a competent civil court and a civil suit had been filed. Under Sections 22-C(1) and 22-C(2) of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987, the Lok Adalat proceedings were …

ROVINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rovin, was arrested in connection with Crime No. 376 of 2026 for alleged possession of 130 grams of alprazolam powder and charged under several provisions of the Indian Penal Code, the Information Technology Act, and the NDPS Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the …

SUDHIR KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Sudhir Kumar petitioned the Allahabad High Court for a character certificate from the Commissioner of Police, Prayagraj, alleging that the authority had not acted on his representations. The State of U.P. and other respondents opposed the petition. The Court, without examining the merits, directed …

MUNNA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners Munna and others challenged two orders: one dated 23 July 2026 dismissing their second appeal as not maintainable under Section 209(e) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, and another dated 16 October 2025 which remanded the matter back to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate after setting …

DEEKSHA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals living in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The respondents …

SUBHASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 20‑12‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 06‑04‑2026, and the entire proceedings in State v. Subhash (Case No. 3154 of 2026). The High Court examined the FIR, the …

CHAKRADHAR DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Chakradhar Dubey filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Deepak Kashinath Dubey, expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and seek an alternative remedy. The respondents, the State of U.P. and two others, were represented by Ayush Mittal, …

NISARversusGULZAR KHAN

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ghaziabad to decide Suit No. 505 of 2020 expeditiously. The High Court referred to a recent Supreme Court decision (High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2024) which held …

SMT. MOHINI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant, wife/informant of the accused, sought transfer of a criminal case from Kalpi Magistrate Court to a court in Jalaun, citing inconvenience due to a 50 km distance. The applicant argued that participation via video‑conferencing would serve the ends of justice. The court referred to its …

VIKASH KUMARversusPUJA KUMARI

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Varanasi, to decide his pending divorce petition (Case No. 1080/2025) within a fixed time. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had been pending …

SATYAPAL YADAVversusBRAJPAL YADAV AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Satyapal Yadav filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a directive to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Chandauli to decide Original Suit No. 628/2019, which has been pending since October 2019. The High Court examined whether it could order a subordinate court to expedite the …

ATIF LARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Atif Lari, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 478 of 2019) instituted under Section 307 IPC. The applicant, being the husband of the informant, asserted that the dispute had been amicably settled and a …

ANITA RATHORE AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The appellants filed a suit for permanent injunction to restrain the State of U.P. and the police from interfering with their possession of 950 sq m of land that they claim has been under a lease since 1942. The trial court dismissed their interim injunction application, holding that the revenue …

JAYRAM SINGHversusHARISH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jayram Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bareilly, to decide a pending temporary injunction application filed in Suit No. 770 of 2023 under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC. The petitioner argued that the lower …

NANDLALversusSITARAM AND 10 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Naugarh to decide an original suit (No. 117 of 2016) expeditiously. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh …

SUAIB KHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Suaib Khan and another, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 132 and 121(1) of the BNSS, 2023, fearing arrest. The State, represented by the Advocate General, objected, arguing that the alleged …

RAJ KUMAR AGRAHARI AND 3 OTHERSversusSMT. SANGEETA KESHARWANI AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 7, Prayagraj, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6-C) in Civil Suit No. 5 of 2004. The petitioners argued that the injunction application had …

VANDANA JOSHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vandana Joshi, who was arrested in a case (Crime No. 245 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. Joshi claimed she was falsely implicated, worked as an agent for Senemi …

BASDEB SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

Basdeb Singh filed a writ petition against the Union of India and four other respondents. After hearing arguments, the petitioner sought dismissal of the petition with liberty to approach the appropriate authority for relief, which he had not yet done. The Court noted that the petitioner had not …

MANOJ BHATI @ MANOJ KUMAR BHATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manoj Bhati filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the police to conclude the investigation of Case Crime No. 1417 of 2019, which involves offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC, after a CBI charge‑sheet was filed on 30‑06‑2022. The …

DEEPIKA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Deepika Singh filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a court order directing the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court in Kanpur to dispose of her pending Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance case within a fixed time‑frame. The applicant argued that the case, filed on …

OM PRAKASH PANDEYversusVED PRAKASH PANDEY AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) East, Ballia to decide a pending temporary injunction application (Form 6‑C) in Suit No. 849 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained undecided for an …

MUJMMILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 8, 21, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act, fearing arrest. He also sought interim protection to appear before the trial court and apply for regular bail. The State did not oppose the prayer. …

BHOLA AND 2 OTHERSversusMEMERS MUSKAN BUILDBAE MMI COMPLEX

The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a High Court order directing the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Mathura to expedite the disposal of Suit No. 183 of 2019, pending since 2019. The Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar …

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Ashok Kumar, who feared arrest in a session case involving alleged offences under several provisions of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 16 and 17 of the Protection of …

JAIRAM AND 3 OTHERSversusGHANSHYAM AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No.15, Azamgarh to decide Original Suit No. 682 of 2018 within a time‑bound schedule. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) …

ASHISH KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Ashish Kumar and another filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of U.P. and two private respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. The petitioners, both adults, submitted school certificates and an application for marriage …

MEWALALversusSRI RAJEEV KRISHNA DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE AND 2 OTHERS

Mewalal filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court against the Director General of Police, Sri Rajeev Krishna, and two others. The applicant's counsel, Lal Chandra Mishra, submitted that the application had become infructuous and should be dismissed. The court considered the …

NISHANT KUMAR VIVEKversusSMT. APOORVA SINGH

The petitioner, Nishant Kumar Vivek, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Gautam Budh Nagar, to decide a pending divorce petition (Misc. Civil Case No. 236 of 2025) within a stipulated period. The petition argued that the …

RAMBHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rambhan, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 280 of 2026) under Sections 103(1), 238 and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He argued that he was falsely implicated, the FIR was filed 39 days after the incident, he was not named in the FIR, and the only accusation against him came …

ANAS AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants (Anas and six others) filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings pending against them for offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 354 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants claimed …

YASH GUPTAversusANIL KUMAR GUPTA AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner Yash Gupta filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Meerut, to decide a 6-C2 application filed in Original Suit No.203 of 2025. The High Court, noting that keeping the petition pending would serve no useful purpose, disposed of …

RAJANI DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioners Rajani Devi and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed and that they be given liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court allowed the prayer and dismissed the writ petition as not pressed, granting …

LAXMANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Laxman filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 20763 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Deepak Kumar Tripathi, later sought leave to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue any appropriate remedy under law. The State of U.P. and other …

RAJARAMversusPRAMOD AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the alleged violation of a temporary injunction granted by the trial court in a suit. The petitioner argued that the respondents had breached the injunction, but the petition did not involve an application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the CPC. The …

GIRISH KUMAR RAWAT (SINCE DECEASED) AND 5 OTHERSversusMANOJ BUTIYA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Hathras to decide Suit No. 60 of 2014 within a stipulated period, invoking Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh …

SHANI @ AVNEESH RAJBHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shani @ Avneesh Rajbhar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC fearing arrest in a case (Crime No. 211 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 304 and 126(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed false implication arising from …

AMAN VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Aman Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25-06-2019, the cognizance and summoning order dated 06-07-2019, and the non‑bailable warrant dated 06-02-2023 in a case registered as Crime No. 478 of 2018 under …

SHYAM KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The petitioners Shyam Kumar and two others filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC. The learned Additional Government Advocate objected, noting that the applicants had multiple prior criminal cases which were not disclosed as required by Chapter XVIII, Rule 18(7) of the …

KUNAN URF KUNALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Kunan Urf Kunal under Section 482 CrPC in a rape case (Crime No. 0171 of 2026). The applicant claimed false implication, citing a five‑day delay in filing the FIR, lack of medical evidence, and evidence of a consensual extra‑marital …

AVDHESH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

Avdhesh Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC s.482 in a case where charge‑sheet had already been filed for offences under IPC s.498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act s.3/4. The learned Attorney‑General objected that the offences were not punishable with imprisonment …

DAALCHANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Daalchand, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 20‑07‑2013 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 19‑02‑2014 in Crime No. 666 of 2013, which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. …

KHEMAKARAN KUMAR @ NIKTEN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Khemakaran Kumar alias Niketan and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 23‑02‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 21‑04‑2026, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 13397 of 2026 relating to …

AMAN KHANDELWAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners, Aman Khandelwal and another, filed a habeas corpus petition seeking visitation rights to their 15‑month‑old daughter, Atharvi, who is in the custody of the respondent, Akansha Rawat, the mother, following a matrimonial dispute. The mother has left the matrimonial home, lodged an FIR …

VIPIN PRAKASH PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSHIVA DEVI (SINCE DECEASED) AND 18 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No.10, Allahabad to expedite the hearing of Original Suit No. 500 of 2011, which had been pending since March 2011. The High Court examined whether it could issue a time‑bound directive to a subordinate civil …

SMT RANJU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt Ranju and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent order restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and directing police protection. The petitioners submitted evidence of their adulthood and consent to marriage, along with an application for …

SUNITA YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The respondents opposed the prayer, …

ALIYA TARIQversusPRINCIPAL BISHOP JOHNSON SCHOOL AND COLLEGE AND ANOTHER

A writ petition under Article 227 was filed by Aliya Tariq against Principal Bishop Johnson School and College. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the petitioner was not pressing the petition. The court considered the petitioner's statement that the petition was …

SHANKAR LAL AND ANOTHERversusSMT. SABIYA BEGUM AND ANOTHER

The petitioners Shankar Lal and another filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Allahabad, to decide a Section 6-C application filed in Original Suit No.1707 of 2026. The High Court, noting that keeping the matter pending would serve no …

AKHILESH KUMAR SINGHversusSMT. RINKI BHAGAT AND ANOTHER

Akhilesh Kumar Singh filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the Civil Principal Judge of the Family Court, Ghaziabad, to decide his divorce suit (Suit No. 910 of 2021) within a fixed time frame. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had been pending since 2021, causing undue …

SMT. MISTHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court entertained a habeas corpus petition filed by Smt. Misthi, a 21‑year‑old woman who had voluntarily married Amrend Kumar on 03‑08‑2026. The petition sought her release from police custody and the return of her personal belongings, which were held by the police and her parents. The …

RAJEEV KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, a headmaster in Meerut, challenged a suspension order dated 28 July 2026 issued by the District Basic Education Officer after an incident at his school that led to a gathering of guardians and an enquiry report alleging negligence. He contended that he had left the school prior to …

RISHABHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rishabh, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 39 of 2026) alleging misuse of a stolen SIM card. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, which was filed four days after the alleged offence, and that the informant’s complaint was delayed by seven days, providing no direct …

GYANENDRA @ CHHOTAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Gyanendra @ Chhotai, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 152 of 2022, which involved offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the Protection of …

NAND RANI AND 3 OTHERSversusSANIYA AND 24 OTHERS

The petitioners Nand Rani and three others filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the petitioners appeared before the bench. The court held that no case for interference was made out. Accordingly, the petition was dismissed. The judgment …

CHANDRAKANT PANDEYversusBATESHWAR NATH SINCE DECEASED AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Chandrakand Pandey, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a High Court direction for the early disposal of his civil suit (No. 1057/2020) pending before the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Bhadohi. The Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar …

SHADAB @ ABDUL MAJIDversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shadab @ Abdul Majid, accused under Sections 3, 5 and 25 of the Arms Act in Crime No. 505 of 2026, applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The applicant’s counsel argued that a co‑accused, Jarrar, had already been granted bail in a similar case, invoking the principle of parity. The State …

RAMSAKALversusMOHAN AND 13 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Mohammadabad Gohna to decide a 2005 civil suit within a specific time frame. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar …

QAYUMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure challenging the cognizance order dated 24‑12‑2018 and the charge sheet dated 20‑02‑2018 in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant contended that the cognizance …

AMARNATH AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (respondent No.2) to decide a computerized revenue case (T202616660108771/2026) concerning land in Village‑Musahi, under Section 134 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged that the proceeding, …

MADHUR SRIVASTAV @ MADHUR PRAKASH SRIVASTAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Madhur Srivastav filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 19 July 2026 that alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the SC/ST Act, later limiting relief to protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held …

LAXMI SHANKAR KATIYAR AND ANOTHERversusRAVINDRA SINGH AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents had failed to comply with an order dated 9 September 2019 in Writ Petition No. 12175 of 2018, which required implementation of a Pension/Gratuity Scheme within eight weeks. Two special appeals (Nos. 1071 and 1072 of 2019) were …

ARJUN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Arjun Kumar filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order that issued a recovery warrant for maintenance arrears against him. He claimed he was unaware of the ex parte maintenance order and had not been given a chance to defend himself, offering to deposit 50% of the amount claimed. The …

ASIF AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Counsel for the applicants submitted that the application had become infructuous and should therefore be dismissed. The opposite party did not object to this …

NOORHASANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Noorhasan, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0035 of 2026) alleging false implication. He argued that the FIR was delayed, he was not named in it, and the only evidence against him was a CDR report showing conversations with co-accused Dan Singh, which he said did not prove …

AZADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Azad, applied for bail in Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 31657 of 2026 concerning Crime No. 152 of 2026, which alleged offences under Sections 140(1), 103(1), 238, 61(2) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant had no prior criminal record and a co‑accused, Ajab …

AKHILESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Akhilesh Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 20‑11‑2017 and the accompanying order dated 20‑07‑2026, which were issued after he failed to appear despite having been released on bail in a case …

IRFAN @ LUCCHAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Irfan @ Luccha, filed a bail application under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, in connection with Crime No. 266 of 2026 arising from a police case in Dhampur, Bijnor. He contended that the charge was based on a single incident shown …

KANTI KUMARversusGOPAL PRASAD SHARMA, ADVOCATE AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Court No. 3, Mathura, to decide an application filed under Order I Rule 10 of the CPC on 27‑03‑2023 in Civil Suit No. 257 of 2021. The petition solely requested expeditious disposal of …

TAHQEEKversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Tahqeek, filed a bail application in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and has no prior criminal history. He has been in custody since 17 August 2026 and …

KRISHAN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The revisionist, a government teacher, challenged a Family Court order granting his wife and daughter maintenance of Rs.16,000 per month, arguing that salary deductions reduced his net income and the amount was excessive. The State contended that the trial court correctly applied the Supreme Court's …

RAMAWATI DEVIversusSANTOSH KUMAR SINGH AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ramawati Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), East, Ballia, to decide a pending 6-C2 temporary injunction application in Original Suit No. 162 of 2026. The High Court observed that keeping the matter pending would …

RADHEY SHYAM MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, a complainant, filed a complaint against the outgoing village Pradhan which was investigated and found baseless in a report dated 12.1.2026, with a final report submitted on 14.5.2026. Dissatisfied with the inquiry findings, the petitioner claimed that authorities had directed a …