Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 6401–6600
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted that the facts were analogous to a prior …
Kripal Singh filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 5928 of 2021, alleging false implication and lack of evidence. The State opposed, contending that the issues were factual and that at the stage of taking cognizance only a prima facie case is required. The …
Ramawati Devi, the mother of a co-accused, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 3(5), 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 103(1) of the B.N.S. She argued that she was falsely implicated, that the FIR contained only general allegations against her, and that a …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals living together in a live‑in relationship, alleged harassment and threats from family members and sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the police to protect their life and liberty. The Court examined whether the Constitution’s …
Mukesh Babu Tripathi filed a criminal transfer application (No. 335 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and another party. The applicant, through counsel Azad Khan, sought permission to withdraw the petition at the stage it was pending. The court considered whether a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25‑12‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 05‑07‑2025, and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 15665 of 2025 (State vs. Sanjay Sharma and others). The court …
Mohd Aslam Khan filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 31‑10‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 09‑01‑2026 in a case registered as Crime No.239 of 2025 under Sections 354A, 354C and 509 of the IPC. The opposite party questioned …
The petitioners, a married couple, sought a writ of mandamus directing the State and its officials not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide them protection against threats from family members. The court noted that both petitioners are adults, as evidenced by their Aadhaar …
The appellant, Santraj Singh, filed an appeal under Section 74 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, challenging an order dated 24.03.2026. The Registry objected, stating that a Section 74 appeal can be filed only against …
The applicant, Smt. Kausalya Devi, filed a contempt petition alleging that the opposite party, Tehsildar Sushil Kumar Bharti, failed to comply with an order dated 18‑03‑2024 in Writ B No. 1107 of 2024, which required him to consider the applicant's application. The court noted that on 07‑09‑2026 a …
Petitioners Navya and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority, affidavits confirming consensual marriage, and an …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul Kumar, who was charged under several IPC provisions and the POCSO Act for allegedly fathering a child with a mentally retarded victim. The prosecution’s case relied on the victim’s identification, but the victim could not clearly …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summons, cognizance order and chargesheet filed against them in a criminal case under Sections 291 and 352 of the BNSS. They contended that the FIR was false, based on a neighbourhood dispute, and that the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite the disposal of a criminal case (State vs. Ram Bachan, case No. 5085 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gorakhpur, under Sections 323 …
Faizan was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case involving alleged transfer of Rs.9 lakhs and charged under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 340(2), 338 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. He had been in custody since 10 April 2025, amounting to more than one …
Anita Yadav filed a contempt application alleging that Dr. Nanhku Ram, the Chief Medical Officer, willfully defied an order dated 21 November 2025 in Writ (A) No. 17599 of 2025, which required the petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation and related documents before the Chief Medical …
The Allahabad High Court considered the bail application of Prema Devi in Criminal Case No. 367 of 2025, where the prosecution relied solely on circumstantial evidence and no eye‑witness to the death of the victim. The applicant contended that there was no incriminating material against her, that …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sandeep, who was implicated in a murder case (Crime No. 557 of 2025) after his name appeared in the confessional statement of the main accused, Harish Tyagi. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that there was no …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quashing of two criminal cases (ST No.22 of 2023 and ST No.114 of 2022) arising from Crime No.64 of 2022, which involved several non‑compoundable offences under the IPC. Both the applicants and the State admitted that they had …
The applicant, Kishan Vishwakarma, was arrested in connection with a violent incident that resulted in the death of a relative of the first informant. The FIR alleged that the applicant and his family assaulted the informant's elder brother and that the applicant caused a head injury to the …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State to refrain from interfering with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhishek Yadav, who was arrested in a case involving alleged fraud causing a loss of Rs. four crores and charged under several IPC sections. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted no specific allegations against him, and highlighted that …
Petitioner Omveer Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after a revised call. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court dismissed the petition for want of …
The petitioners, Pooja Singh and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and asserted that their marriage was …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, alleged harassment and threats from family members and sought a writ of mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection under Article 226. The Court noted that …
The petitioners, Riya Rajbhar and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority and …
Shankar Singh Lodhi applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 224 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 308(5), 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, where the prosecution alleged he snatched Rs.10,000 and threatened to extort Rs.10 lakh. The applicant contended that he was falsely …
The petitioners, who are in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their life and liberty against threats from private respondents. The State contended that petitioner No.1 is still married to another person, making the live-in relationship …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair, impartial and expeditious investigation of an FIR dated 22-04-2026 and to produce the case diary and investigation records before the court. The State, represented by the learned …
The applicant, Chandrapal, filed a criminal transfer application before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the applicant’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether a transfer application could be withdrawn at the applicant’s request. Finding no …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 22‑04‑2026 under Sections 109(1), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. 2023 and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest him while the petition was pending. After arguments, the petitioner’s counsel …
S.J. Enterprises filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 14031 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating the petitioner would pursue other …
Petitioner Mukesh Siddharth filed a writ petition seeking relief from a demand by the Senior Superintendent of Police for 100% cost of security provided to him. The police later issued a revised demand of 10% cost on 1 August 2026. The petitioner, through counsel Aditya Prasad Mishra, argued that …
The petitioners, Gunjan and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection, alleging threats from the private respondent and family members. They submitted proof of age …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 22‑04‑2026 and a mandamus to restrain their arrest. The State argued that the investigation was complete and a charge‑sheet had been filed on 21‑07‑2026, supporting its position with a short …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ of mandamus seeking protection from interference in their marital life and direction to the police to safeguard them. They asserted that they had married of their own free will, faced threats from family members, and had applied for marriage registration. …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against harassment by family members. The Court noted that the facts were …
The petitioners, Smt Arshi and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age (school leaving certificate …
The applicant, Yashraj Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 04‑12‑2025, the cognizance order dated 12‑02‑2026 and the entire proceedings of State v Yashraj Verma (Case No. 8859 of 2026). The applicant alleged that the …
Jameel Khan applied for bail in a case registered under the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and that he is not a gang member. He highlighted that he had already been granted bail in five other related …
The petitioners, two adult individuals, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital cohabitation and to provide police protection. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority, affidavits confirming a consensual marriage, and alleged …
The applicant, an accused in a criminal case (Session Case No. 31201/2020 under Section 380 IPC), filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a court order directing the trial court to dispose of the case within a stipulated time. The State’s counsel raised no objection provided the …
The applicants Nilesh Singh and Bhola Singh were arrested in connection with the recovery of 5.150 kg of ganja and alleged possession of arms under Section 109 of the B.N.S., Section 8/20 of the N.D.P.S. Act and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. They had been in custody since 7 May 2026 and sought bail …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live‑in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted that the facts were …
The petitioners, Smt. Pooja Ahirwar and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel informed the Court that an FIR (Case Crime No. 150 of 2026) had already been lodged under …
The petitioners, Nisha and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection. They submitted proof of majority and affirmed that their marriage was entered into voluntarily without …
The petitioners, Aaisha and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of majority and affirmed that their marriage was …
The petitioners, a consenting adult couple, sought a writ of mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their marital life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affirmed that their marriage was being registered. The Court, …
The petitioners, two adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful married life and to provide protection against threats from family members. They submitted high‑school mark‑sheets and a marriage registration certificate to prove their …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State to prevent interference by family members and to provide police protection. The court noted that the facts were analogous to a prior decision (Akanksha v. State …
The petitioners, Laxmi Devi and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted identity documents to prove majority and …
The petitioners, Ananya Gaur and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide police protection. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority, affidavits confirming a consensual marriage, and alleged …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State to protect them from harassment by family members. The Court observed that the facts were identical to a prior decision (Writ‑C No. 35171 of 2025) and …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted that the facts were analogous to a prior …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted school mark sheets to prove majority and affirmed that their marriage was …
Gulab Yadav applied for bail in a case involving alleged offences under sections 85, 89, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act, sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act and section 67 of the I.T. Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged 1.5 months after the alleged incident, …
The petitioners, Mahrun Jahan and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affirmed that their …
Petitioners Smt. Sanjana and another filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel informed the court that a criminal FIR (Case Crime No. 60 of 2026) had already been lodged under Sections 87 and 137(2) of the Indian Penal Code at …
The petitioners, a married couple who are both adults, sought a writ of mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affirmed that their marriage was consensual, …
The petitioners, Anshika and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted school mark sheets to prove majority and …
The petitioners, Jyoti and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted Aadhaar cards to prove majority and claimed they had …
The petitioners, a married couple, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted their marriage registration certificate and school marksheets to …
Monu Bharti applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 366 of 2025) under the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, invoking sections 2(b)(i), 2(b)(xi) and 3(1). He contended that the prosecution was based on police rivalry, that he is not a gang member, and …
The petitioners, Antima Devi and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted school mark sheets to prove majority, …
The petitioners, Farheen and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital cohabitation and to provide police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affirmed that their …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority and affirmed that their marriage was …
The petitioners, both adults of different faiths, married under Section 5 of the Special Marriage Act and live together, but face threats and harassment from family members. They filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful life and to …
The applicant, Prakash Rajpoot, filed a bail application in a case registered as Crime No.154 of 2025 under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the charges were based on police rivalry, that he had already been granted bail …
The petitioner, Amit Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against him. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pravesh Kumar alias Golu in a case under Sections 69 and 351(3) of the B.N.S., alleging a sexual offence. The applicant contended that the relationship with the informant was consensual and that the FIR was lodged belatedly, arguing that the …
Samrat applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.40 of 2026) alleging he fired pellets causing injuries to three persons. The prosecution alleged he was the primary accused under IPC sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 109(1), 3(5) BNS and Arms Act sections 3, 25, 27, while the defence argued his …
Prince Singh was arrested in connection with a case under Section 109(1) of the NDPS Act and the Arms Act for alleged possession of 3 kg of opium and 2.3675 quintals of poppy straw. The applicant contended that the recovery was false, the quantity was only marginally above commercial limits, and …
Manish, accused in a case under Sections 109(1), 352 and 3(5) B.N.S., applied for enlargement of bail after his earlier bail plea was rejected. He argued that other co‑accused (Gagan, Vishan Kana and Shivam) had been granted bail, and that he had no criminal antecedents. The State opposed, …
The applicant, Ramsamush, was charged under Sections 8, 22, 23 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act in Criminal Case No. 131 of 2026, with two cases filed against him simultaneously. A co‑accused, Naveen Kumar Gautam, had earlier been released on bail by the same court …
The petitioner, Dayanand Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. While the petition was pending, the petitioner was arrested and subsequently informed the Court that he no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The State’s Additional …
The Allahabad High Court considered the bail application of Yogesh Kumar, who was charged in Criminal Case No. 100 of 2026 under IPC sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 64(1). The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, being the brother of co‑accused Pramod Kumar, and that the FIR was …
The applicant, Babloo Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 188 of 2025) against Laxman and others, which involved offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 of the IPC. …
The applicant, Shakir Nepali, sought bail in a narcotics case (Crime No. 0203 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. He claimed innocence, alleging false recovery of 1.124 kg of charas and lack of a chemical analyst's report, as well as …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Khushbu, who is accused in Criminal Case No. 87 of 2026 under IPC sections 137(2), 3(5), 142 and 143(4) for alleged child abduction. Counsel for the applicant contended that she is innocent, that there is no direct evidence against her, …
The revisionists, Prashant Kumar and Deepu, filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad, which rejected their discharge application in a case under IPC sections 323, 504 and 354. They contended that the allegations were false, the investigation …
The petitioners Ajay Notiyal and three others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 15994 of 2026 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. They were represented by counsel Anju Yadav, Vivek Kumar Sharma, Ashutosh Tripathi, Kuldeep Singh, Puneet Kumar and Vikas Kumar Yadav. During …
Dr Harshvardhan Sharma filed a contempt application alleging that Dr Narayan Das willfully defied the High Court's order dated 26‑11‑2025 in Writ‑A No. 17841, which required the petitioner to file a representation before the Director of Ayurveda Department by 12‑12‑2025 and for the department to …
Manoranjan Kumar applied under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashing of an order that denied the release of his passport and permission to travel abroad. The applicant had deposited his passport with the police after obtaining anticipatory bail, but the trial court rejected his request for travel …
The petitioner, Jigar Sahni, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 16272 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Akash Kumar Verma, subsequently moved the Court for leave to withdraw the petition. The respondent, the State of Uttar Pradesh, through the Attorney …
The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the respondent had willfully defied the High Court's order dated 30‑10‑2025, which directed the Consolidation Officer to decide objections under section 9A(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Housing Societies Act within three months. The …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 18.05.2026 (Case Crime No.189 of 2026) and a direction restraining the third respondent from arresting him. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 3(5) and 194(2) of the Indian Penal Code. …
The applicant, Kallu alias Kalua, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 389 of 2026) involving alleged violations of Sections 109(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3, 25, 27 of the Arms Act, arising from a police firing incident at Bhojipura, Bareilly. The counsel for the applicant and …
The applicant, Smt. Sunehri Devi, filed a contempt application alleging that the Uttar Pradesh Police Headquarters had willfully defied the High Court’s order dated 11 April 2017 which directed payment of family pension and permitted a fresh representation for her late husband’s post‑retirement …
The applicants Mahaveer Singh and nine others filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (BNSS No. 29312 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants at the revised call, while the State’s A.G.A. was present. The Court …
A writ petition (Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 16566 of 2026) was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad by C.B. Singh @ Chandrabali Singh against the State of U.P. and two others. The petitioner’s counsel, Rajnish Kumar Verma, sought leave to withdraw the petition after hearing. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhagwan Singh @ Bhoora Pradhan in a case under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the IPC relating to alleged GST document fraud. The applicant claimed innocence, stating he was not named in the FIR and was implicated only on hearsay, …
The applicant, Arvind Kumar, filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents, Smt Arti Singh and another, failed to comply with an order issued in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 52588 of 2014 (Razeena Bano & Another Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others). The court noted that an FIR (No. 0210 of …
Javed was arrested in Mathura under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act for alleged possession of 358 grams of alprazolam recovered from the dashboard of a car in which he was travelling with two others. He contended that he was falsely implicated and has been in custody since 4 June …
The applicants, Omveer and Kishanpal alias Kushanpal, were implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 130 of 2026) involving serious IPC offences including murder and attempt to murder. The first applicant, Omveer, had died, and the second applicant was in custody since May 27, 2026, with a criminal …
The High Court considered a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 23922 of 2026) filed by Omveer and Kishanpal alias Kushanpal, who were accused in a case under IPC sections 310(2), 317(3) and 61(2). The applicants claimed innocence, argued that the FIR named unknown persons and that …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to comply with an order dated 12‑Nov‑2020 passed under Section 30 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to deliver possession of the land. The petitioners argued that the order had been affirmed after an appeal was …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 6719 of 2025) that were based on Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the same Act. The applicant argued that he had not been arrested and that a …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (respondent No.2) to decide a suit for division of holding filed under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 15 May 2023. The petitioner argued that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pravendra Singh, who is alleged to be involved in a criminal offence arising from a land dispute. The applicant argued that he is the brother‑in‑law of the informant and uncle of the victim, and highlighted material inconsistencies between the …
Yogesh applied for bail in a kidnapping case (Criminal No. 278 of 2026) where a child was recovered after his alleged involvement. The prosecution alleged that Yogesh and a co‑accused were apprehended in a police encounter and that police personnel sustained injuries. Yogesh contended that the …
The applicant, Pushpendra, sought bail in a narcotics case (Crime No. 134 of 2026) under Sections 8, 20 and 29 of the NDPS Act, alleging false implication and inflated drug quantity. The applicant's counsel argued innocence, lack of prior serious criminal history, and willingness to cooperate, while …
The applicant Bhuai Lal Pal filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court against the Nagar Nigam. Counsel for the applicant stated at the bar that the order of the writ court should be complied with. The court examined whether this statement amounted to contempt of court. Finding …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Nihal Singh, who was arrested in a gang‑rape case involving a minor girl aged 15‑17 years under Section 70(2) of the Bail and Surrender Act and Sections 5(g) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, lack of …
The applicant, Mohd. Muzaffar, filed a bail application in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging false implication and police rivalry. He had been in custody since 12 June 2026 and claimed he was not a gang member and had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 04.05.2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the State and the second …
The applicant, Nand Gopal Tiwari, filed a contempt petition alleging that the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sandeep Parcha, failed to comply with a High Court order dated 24 July 2025 which directed the lower court to procure the presence of accused persons (Nos. 2‑8) within three months and …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 07.07.2026. The petitioners did not …
Vikas Kumar applied for bail in a case registered under Section 65(1) of the BNSS and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication as his name does not appear in the FIR and the victim's statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS. The applicant argued that the victim, aged …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner informed the court that he had already been arrested and no longer wished to pursue the writ, seeking to withdraw it. The State and the other respondents raised no …
The petitioner, Chhote Lal, sought a direction for the revenue authorities to enter his name in the land records after a sale deed executed in 1990 was declared null and void by an ex‑parte decree. He claimed he could not locate a mutation application filed in 2018 and argued that the court's …
Manish Kumar was arrested in a case alleging rape of his 15‑year‑old daughter under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The FIR was lodged six months after the alleged incident under Section 173(4) of the B.N.S., and the victim refused a medical examination. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 1698 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the IPC. They argued that they had not been arrested and that …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by a Judicial Magistrate in Mathura in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The applicant contended that he …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kanhaiya Kumar under Section 5(J)(ii)/6 of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication and noting that he had already been granted bail for other offences. The State opposed the bail, but the court examined the nature of the offence, the evidence, …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 78 of 2026) arising under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 352 and 351(2) of the same Act. The applicant argued that he had not been arrested and that the …
The applicant, Ikramuddin, filed an application under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant, Ashwini Kumar Srivastava, informed the court that he no longer wished to pursue the application and requested its withdrawal. The court …
The petitioners, Abhishek Haryana and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings against them. The State had already concluded the investigation, filed a charge-sheet, and the magistrate had taken cognizance on 21-08-2026, leading …
The petitioner, Salman Odi @ Ajaruddin, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17327 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging a matter against the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that he no longer wished to pursue the …
The applicant, Dhanpal, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 69 of the B.N.S., alleging sexual intercourse by deceit with a married woman. He contended that the relationship was consensual and that the FIR was filed belatedly, with no corroborative evidence linking him to the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 15546 of 2025) arising from multiple offences under sections 115(2), 316(2), 324(2), 351(3) and 333. The applicants argued that they had not …
Petitioners Seema Bargah and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The State and the fourth respondent, …
Petitioners Maya Devi and four others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17369 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of U.P. The petition was being heard by Hon'ble Justices Rajiv Gupta and Devendra Singh-I. During the hearing, counsel for the …
The applicants, Sayed Ahmad and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summoning order dated 08.01.2025 and the entire proceedings in a complaint case under Section 365 IPC. They later refrained from pressing the substantive relief and instead requested …
The petitioner sought to quash a mutation order dated 17‑12‑2008 that was based on a sale deed executed by his mother, alleging the deed was illegal. After a nine‑year delay, the petitioner filed a restoration application, which the mutation court allowed but ultimately upheld the original mutation …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 97432 of 2025) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar, where they were charged under several IPC provisions and the …
The petitioner, Ramesh Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The State’s Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the investigation was complete and a …
The petitioner, Dharm Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection. The court considered the request to withdraw the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Avinash, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences. The applicant contended that …
The petitioner, Lal Miyan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against him on 11 June 2026. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been submitted. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 26‑10‑2018 in Criminal Case No. 5057 of 2018, which was instituted under Section 323 of the IPC. They contended that the magistrate had taken …
The minor Arun Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The State’s Additional …
Padam Tripathi @ Rudransh Tripathi was arrested in a gang‑rape case under Section 70(2) of the Bail and Surrender Act and Sections 5(g) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s age was disputed – 17 years per radiological examination and 15 years per school certificate – and the medico‑legal report was …
The applicant, Pankaj Patel, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 1582 of 2025) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Prayagraj. The charges, filed under Sections 191(2), 115(2), …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 1498 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 117(2) and 352 IPC. They argued that they had not been arrested and that the charge‑sheet …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in a Session Trial relating to a 2013 murder case under Section 307 IPC. The applicant contended that he was on bail when the NBW was issued and …
Mahendra Singh and 17 others filed a contempt petition against Chandni Singh and 2 others alleging that the opposite party failed to comply with the order dated 23 February 2026 in Writ C No. 41482 of 2025, which required them to consider the applicants' application. The court produced instructions …
The petitioner, Narendra Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) II, Agra Division, to decide an appeal (No. 1909 of 2025) filed under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The appeal, arising from proceedings under Section 144 of the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 28‑06‑2024 in a criminal complaint (Case No. 143827 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 420, 406, 506 and 511 of the IPC. The parties were engaged in a financial …
Ajai Kumar Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair, speedy, and proper investigation of an FIR dated 05.05.2024 under IPC sections 420, 406 and IT Act section 66. The petitioner alleged that the police were not investigating …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Kamla Verma, who was charged with offences including Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m), 351(3) of the same Act and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed …
Petitioner Krishna Kumar Tiwari filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the petition and seeks to withdraw it. The Attorney General for the State and the …
The petitioner, Hasmat Ali, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the State's counsel raised no objection. The court considered the petitioner's clear statement of …
The petitioner, Dheeraj Kumar Gupta, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The State informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 21-11-2023. The petitioner did not contest these facts but expressed a desire to …
The applicants, Rohit Chaurasiya and four others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Shiv Kumar Singh, expressed the intention to withdraw the application. The State's Additional Government Advocate (AGA) raised no …
The applicant, Balwan Singh, filed a contempt petition alleging that the opposite party, Sri Mahavir Kauja Lagi Van Sanrakshak/Regional Director, Bundelkhand Circle, failed to comply with a court order dated 25 March 2026 in Writ A No. 4067 of 2026, which required the opposite party to consider the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Syorajveer Alias Surajveer, who is charged with rape under Sections 64(1) and 351(3) of the IPC. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated due to a village rivalry, that the victim’s medico‑legal report did not support a …
Shiv Singh and thirteen others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17848 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. The State’s Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation had already been concluded and a final …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash an order dated 11 June 2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Prayagraj, which had set aside a magistrate’s dismissal of an application under Section 173(4) of the same Act. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shiv Kumar and two others in a criminal case (Crime No. 156 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 351(3), 352, 191(2), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants contended that they were falsely implicated, had …
The applicant, Tazim @ Imran, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that the charges were based on police rivalry and that he is not a gang member. He had been in custody since …
The petitioner, Meena Agarwal, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to pay her salary from 1 January 1994 to 15 May 2007 along with pension benefits. The State argued that the petition was barred as a second writ for the same relief, since the salary claim …
Neetish Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another respondent. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Vipin Kumar Singh, announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ petition …
Petitioner Dhanraj Nishad filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an investigation. The investigating agency had already concluded the inquiry and issued a final report in the petitioner’s favour on 28 December 2025. The petitioner, through counsel …
The applicant Munne filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a notice dated 27.05.2026 issued by the City/Executive Magistrate, Mirzapur, in a criminal case (State Vs. Munne) under Section 129G of the BNSS. The High Court examined the FIR, the impugned notice, and the …
The applicant, Vaish Khan, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a notice dated 27.05.2026 issued under Section 130 of the BNSS by the City/Executive Magistrate, Mirzapur, in criminal case No.33 of 2026 (State vs. Vaish Khan) under Section 129G of the BNSS. The High …
The applicant, Mohd. Arbaj Khan, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a notice dated 27‑05‑2026 issued by the City/Executive Magistrate, Mirzapur, under Section 130 of the BNSS in a criminal case (State Vs. Mohd. Arbaj Khan). The High Court examined the FIR, the …
The applicant Lakshman filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 107 of 2026) arising from alleged offences under Sections 352 and 110 of the same Act. The applicant argued that he had not been …
The petitioner, Ayush Mittal, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against him. The State of U.P. and other respondents indicated that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 04-09-2026. The petitioner admitted …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by 64‑year‑old retired employee Sudhadevi Srivastava, who feared arrest in a case alleging misappropriation of Rs. 29,93,943 along with 12 co‑accused. The alleged amount had been deposited and no actual loss was claimed; the receipt of …
The applicant, Ram Charan, filed a contempt petition alleging that the opposite parties failed to comply with an order dated 05-08-2025 in Writ C No. 21683 of 2022, which required them to consider his application. The court examined the instructions and the exchange of orders dated 10-06-2026, which …
The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court‑1, Jaunpur, to decide a pending criminal case (Case No. 991 of 2022) under Section 128 of the Cr.P.C. within a stipulated time‑frame. The State opposed the prayer, …
The applicants, Smt. Manju Rani and another, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the Family Court, Muzaffarnagar, decide their interim maintenance application and the pending maintenance case (Case No. 1933 of 2025) within a fixed time‑frame. They …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Anuj, who was arrested in a case involving alleged rape of a minor under various sections of the same Act and the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely …
The applicant, Mohd Yaseen, was arrested in connection with a police party‑firing case (Crime No. 220 of 2026) alleged under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that no police personnel were injured, and that …
The petition challenged a Central Administrative Tribunal order granting financial upgradation under the M.A.C.P. Scheme by counting 10, 20 and 30 year service periods. The Tribunal relied on a Cuttack Bench decision in East Coast Railway Engineers case to grant relief. The Union of India argued …
The petitioners, selected as Assistant Teachers in Uttar Pradesh’s Junior Basic Schools, were appointed despite not possessing the required Basic Teacher Certificate (BTC) by the application deadline of 22‑12‑2018; they later obtained the BTC after back‑paper results in 2019 and served for several …
The petitioner, M/s Hotel Ashoka Ocean, sought a mandamus directing the GST authorities to add a surviving partner as promoter on the GST portal, decide pending representations, and refund an excess deposit of Rs.4,14,000. The GST registration had been cancelled and the authorized signatory had …
Furqan was charged under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act in Crime No. 170 of 2026, Pilibhit. He applied for bail during the trial. The High Court examined the facts, the parties' submissions, and noted that a co‑accused, Omkar Mishra, had already been granted bail in a similar case. Relying on …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Pankaj, who was charged with offences under Sections 137(2), 64(1), 61(2) of the same Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, …
Akeel Khan applied for bail in a NDPS case (Crime No. 1216 of 2025) alleging false recovery of 154 grams of alprazolam powder and lack of compliance with Section 52A of the NDPS Act. The applicant claimed innocence, no chemical analysis, and that the charges were fabricated to harass him. The State …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The counsel for the respondent and the Additional Government Advocate for …
The petitioner, Rang Bahadur, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the investigating officer to conclude the investigation of FIR No. 245/2024 under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The State, through the Additional Government Advocate, informed the …
The applicant Jawahar Lal filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge-sheet and summoning order in a case under Section 354 IPC. He alleged that the prosecution was malicious and intended to harass him. The High Court examined whether any of the Supreme …
Manvendra Singh was arrested in Crime No. 90 of 2026 for alleged rape of a minor and related offences under the POCSO Act, SC/ST Act and other statutes. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the medico‑legal report showed no injuries to the victim’s private parts, and that he …
Kajal Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the investigation had been completed and a final report favoring the accused was submitted …
Petitioners filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18004 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of U.P. and others. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners moved the Court for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, …
The applicant, Vishal, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking the court's direction to accept a single personal bond and surety for six separate bail cases in which he had already been granted bail. During hearing, it was clarified that the applicant had never actually furnished …
The petitioner, an advocate, held three arms licences; two were previously cancelled but restored by this Court in Writ Petition No.24565/2023. The remaining licence, issued by the District of Kushinagar, was cancelled by the District Magistrate on the ground of a pending criminal case (Crime …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State. During the hearing, the second petitioner disclosed that he had already been arrested and expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. Both the Additional Government …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Raj Bahadur @ Guddu, who was charged under Sections 65(2), 115(2), 351(2) of the same Act and Sections 5 and 6(1) of the POCSO Act for alleged penetrative sexual assault …
The petitioners filed a writ seeking certiorari to quash two appeals filed by private respondents under Section 331 of the U.P. Zilla Adalat & Land Revenue Act, which challenged a 2006 decree and a rejected restoration application. They argued the appeals were filed after a 19‑year delay and that …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shiva Sahariya, accused under Sections 64(1) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for an alleged rape of a minor. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the medico‑legal report did not …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raj, who was arrested in Crime No. 44 of 2026 under Sections 65(1), 87, 137(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the alleged victim, a 13‑year‑old girl, had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Santosh Kumar, who was arrested in a POCSO case involving a minor victim. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the victim’s statements under Section …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aman Kumar, who was arrested in a POCSO case alleging rape of a minor girl aged about 14 years. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictions in the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the CrPC, …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 14‑05‑2025 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel made an innocuous prayer to withdraw the petition and seek alternative remedies. The …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rahul Kumar, who was implicated in a rape case involving a minor aged 13 years and 10 months. The victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the same …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 09-04-2026. The State and the second opposite party did not contest the settlement. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dayashankar Rajbhar, who was arrested in connection with offences under sections 65(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual exploitation of a minor girl aged 15 years and 3 months. The applicant …
Smt Rakhi Singh filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS requesting that the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Banda, decide a pending criminal case (Criminal Misc. Case No. 111/XI of 2026) under Section 144(3) BNSS within a stipulated period. The State’s A.G.A. raised no objection …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aas Mohammad in a rape case under Sections 64(2), 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 5N and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, the victim’s statement under Section 183 did not incriminate him, the …
The petitioners sought to quash an FIR dated 14 July 2026 and to restrain the police from arresting them, invoking the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. The State opposed the merits of the petition but did not object to an innocuous prayer that the police follow those …
Shiva Saini applied for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a rape case (Crime No. 307 of 2025) involving a minor victim aged between 13 and 17 years. The applicant claimed false implication, highlighted that the medico‑legal report showed an intact hymen and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ankit Singh (applicant) in a criminal case (Crime No. 69 of 2026) under Sections 8, 20 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, alleging that 65 kg of ganja recovered from three …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shubham Yadav, accused under sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. and sections 5J(ii) and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a 17‑year‑old girl who was pregnant. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the …
The applicant, Sunil Kumar Pal, filed a contempt petition alleging that the opposite party, Shri Manish Kumar Verma, failed to comply with a court order dated 30 October 2026 in Writ C No. 37323 of 2025, which required the opposite party to consider the applicant's application. The court noted that …
The applicant, Mrityunjai Kumar Verma, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite a pending Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case (Case No. 117674 of 2023). The applicant argued that the case had been pending since November …
The petitioner, Bhaskar Sahu, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. After the investigation concluded, a charge-sheet was filed against him on 17 July 2026. The petitioner subsequently informed the court that he no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vinod Kumar, who was arrested in connection with an alleged assault over a Rs.400 dispute during a marriage ceremony. The FIR alleged that the accused, along with others, used lathi, danda, kulhari and baluwa, causing grievous injuries to one …
