Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 6601–6800

SURAJPAL SINGHversusATUL VATS, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

The applicant, Surajpal Singh, filed a contempt petition alleging that the District Magistrate, Atul Vats, failed to comply with an order dated 18 February 2026 issued in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 27316 of 2025, which required the magistrate to consider the applicant's application. The court …

KAVITA KUMARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Kavita Kumari, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The court considered the counsel's request and, finding no objection, …

RAJESH KUSHWAHA @ RAJESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rajesh Kushwaha, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 03‑04‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 30‑07‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 17818/2025 (State vs. Kali Charan). The charge‑sheet alleged offences …

MUNABBARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Munabbar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Attorney General highlighted that the applicant had nine prior criminal cases, contradicting the applicant's affidavit claiming no similar history. Confronted with this discrepancy, …

YASHAPAL @ YASHAPAL CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Yashapal Chaudhary under CrPC provisions in a case involving alleged offences under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(3). The FIR alleged that the accused used a country‑made firearm to shoot at two …

GIRJESH KUMAR @ MUNNAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Girjesh Kumar, husband of a deceased woman, who was charged under Sections 108 and 85 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant argued that the death was due to antemortem hanging and that there was no positive act of …

ISHTIYAK AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Ishtiyak Ahmad, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bihar Nagar Seva Samiti Act seeking to set aside a Gram Nyayalaya order dated 31‑03‑2026 passed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. He contended that the Family Court had earlier …

ZOYA KHAN @ NEHA @ CHANDANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Zoya Khan, sought bail in a POCSO case (Crime No. 241 of 2026) alleging false implication and a three‑month delay in filing the FIR. Counsel argued that the applicant is innocent, has no prior criminal record, and has been in custody since 5 July 2026. The State opposed bail but could …

RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA @ RAJESH JARRAHAversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rajesh Kumar Sharma, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings pending against him. The injury report showed no serious injury and the parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the trial court on 06.01.2025. Both …

PRAKASH DWIVEDIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Prakash Dwivedi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police officials to conduct a fair and impartial investigation into Crime No. 222 of 2025 under specific provisions of the B.N.S., 2023 and the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner …

NABABversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant sought to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 1925 of 2010) on the ground of mistaken identity, invoking Section 528 of the BNSS. The High Court examined whether the petition, filed after a 16‑year delay, complied with the requirement of filing within a reasonable time. The court …

RAKESH KUMAR AND AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet and related criminal proceedings involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 307, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had amicably settled the dispute …

KUNAL @ KUNANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kunal @ Kunan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the petition and seeks to withdraw it. The State’s Additional Government Advocate raised …

KAMLESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Kamlesh Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 1130 of 2025, which involves offences under Sections 323, 504 and 342 IPC. The applicant argued that two …

AKRAM ALI ALIAS BHAMBU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 351(2) and 340(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 in a property fraud case. The applicants, Akram Ali alias Bhambu and Mahboob Ahmad, were not named in the FIR and were described as marginal witnesses to an …

MANOJ MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant filed a petition under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 304 and 308 IPC. The applicant alleged false implication and mala‑fide motives, contending …

LILAWATI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Lilawati Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar, Hata Kushinagar, to expedite a mutation proceeding under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 2013 (case no. 6025 of 2026). The petitioner alleged that the proceedings …

BHUPENDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant Bhupendra Yadav filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction for the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 19, Deoria, to expedite the pending complaint case No. 4632 of 2025. The applicant argued that the case, filed in 2025, remained …

KHANJHATI AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 24‑09‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 08‑01‑2026, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 32 of 2026 (State of U.P. v. Khanjhati & others). The court examined …

SATYA PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Satya Prakash filed an application under Section 529 CrPC seeking a court order directing the trial court to expedite Case No. 83 of 2016 (State vs. Daulat Ram) involving offences under Sections 420 and 120‑B IPC, which has been pending since 2016. The State, represented by the Attorney General, …

DHIRENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYversusBHUPENDRA SINGH DISTRICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party had failed to comply with the order dated 29‑01‑2026 in Writ‑A No.1092 of 2026, which required consideration of the applicant's claim. The court examined the instructions produced, which showed an order dated 05‑09‑2026 …

SMT NAGMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Smt Nagma filed an application under Section 144 BNSS seeking a direction that the trial Family Court decide her interim maintenance application filed on 30‑01‑2026 on a time‑bound basis. The High Court examined whether it could impose such a schedule, noting Supreme Court pronouncements that …

MANISH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Manish Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 23 April 2026 passed by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) that rejected his request for an extension of time to file a discharge application and simultaneously framed charges in a criminal case. The applicant …

SHAN AHMAD AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 18‑02‑2026 issued in State v. Shan et al., which arose from charges under IPC sections 498A, 323, 506 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. During the …

NIRMAL MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Nirmal Mishra, filed an application under Section 529 of the Negotiable Instruments Act seeking the trial court to expedite a complaint under Section 138 of the same Act pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad. The trial court had earlier directed the …

SHAILENDRA KUMAR SHAHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shailendra Kumar Shahi filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant, through counsel Sanjeev Kumar Singh, informed the court that he no longer wished to pursue the bail application and requested its withdrawal, seeking liberty to file a fresh …

DR MOBASSHIRA MUZZAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Dr. Mobasshira Muzzam, filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to this withdrawal. …

ANKURversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ankur, filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act in connection with Crime No. 360 of 2026. He claimed the FIR was false, asserting that the incident involved no injury and that a co‑accused was …

AZAD JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Azad Jaiswal, a driver employed by the owner of a godown where large quantities of codeine‑based cough syrups were seized during a police raid. Jaiswal was arrested alongside the seizure but the prosecution’s material did not link him to the …

RANJEET PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ranjeet Prasad filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS Act seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 4 July 2024 in State vs. Ranjeet Prasad (Case No. 4650 of 2024), which charged him under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued, relying on the …

VANSHIKA KATIYAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 11‑Sept‑2025 and the cognizance order of 31‑Jan‑2026 in a criminal case (Case No. 474 of 2026) arising from FIR No. 0288 of 2025. They alleged that the FIR was false, filed to harass them in a …

MOHAMMAD REHAN @ REHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mohammad Rehan and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order and a non‑bailable warrant issued in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 336 IPC and Section 7 of …

SUMIT SHARMA @ BHOLAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sumit Sharma @ Bhola, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 459 of 2026) involving offences under Section 109(1) of the BNS and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. The State opposed the bail, but the applicant's criminal antecedents were explained and deemed not a bar to bail. …

MOHD KARIM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Mohd Karim and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition. The counsel for one of the respondents, Rohit Singh, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The …

SACHIN KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 11.05.2026 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him until a charge-sheet is filed. After arguments, the petitioner’s counsel made an innocuous prayer to withdraw the petition and seek …

OM PRAKASH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 19‑08‑2023, the cognizance and summoning order dated 24‑11‑2023, and the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No. 4729 of 2023 (State v. Sushil Kumar and others) …

PAPPUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a court order directing the trial court to expedite Sessions Trial No. 810 of 2008 (State vs. Jagga @ Jagdish) concerning offences under Sections 302 and 394 IPC. The applicant argued that the trial, …

SHIV ANANDversusARVIND KUMAR CHAUHAN DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

The applicant, Shiv Anand, filed a contempt petition alleging that the District Magistrate, Arvind Kumar Chauhan, failed to comply with the order dated 10 March 2026 in Writ‑A No. 3279 of 2026, which required the magistrate to consider the applicant's application. The High Court examined the …

SATYAM YADAV ALIAS RISHU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Satyam Yadav alias Rishu Yadav, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that he had been falsely implicated because of police rivalry, asserted that he is not a …

RIZWAN KHAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25‑03‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 19‑08‑2025, and the entire proceedings of case No. 72367 of 2025 relating to alleged offences under IPC sections 271, 278, …

RABIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Rabiya filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 16‑03‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 27‑05‑2026, and the entire proceedings in case 33831 of 2026 arising from an FIR under IPC sections 406, 504, 419 and 120B. The High Court examined …

RITIKA SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ritika Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration) of Varanasi Division to decide a pending revision under Section 210 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, relating to a mutation proceeding. The petition alleged undue …

AARTI DWIVEDI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 9 January 2026 and the cognizance order dated 30 June 2026 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banda, in a case arising from offences under Sections 352, 115(2) and 351(3) BNS. The …

X JUVENILEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The juvenile applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 01‑10‑2023, the cognizance/summoning order dated 25‑01‑2024, and the entire proceedings pending before the Juvenile Justice Board, Shamli, relating to offences under IPC sections 147, …

AJAY PANDEY AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 26‑06‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 01‑10‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 595 of 2025. They contended that the offences alleged – Sections 324(4), 352 and 351(2) of the BNSS – are …

FARMAN RAZA @ BABU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Farman Raza @ Babu and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging aspects of the investigation, during which an additional section was added. The Attorney General highlighted this addition, which the petitioners did not dispute. However, the petitioners …

CHANDRASHEKHAR KUMAR MAJHIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar Kumar Majhi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 20 July 2026 under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest him. …

SARVANAND PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 25‑01‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 28‑03‑2026 in Criminal Case No.3697 of 2026. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 352 and …

SHAMIMversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shamim applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC s.482 after a charge sheet was filed. The A.G. argued that the alleged offences (IPC s.420, 406, 506) do not carry a punishment exceeding seven years, so there is no risk of arrest. The applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and …

HIMANSHUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Himanshu, accused in a case (Crime No. 498 of 2026) involving alleged assault on a traffic police constable. The FIR alleged that the accused, while riding a motorcycle, hurled abuses and assaulted the constable, causing a head …

RAMGOLA @ RAM GOLE AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 20‑07‑2026 and a mandamus to restrain their arrest under Sections 8, 20, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act. After arguments, the petitioner's counsel made an innocuous prayer to withdraw the petition and …

AJAY YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered the bail application of Ajay Yadav, who was charged under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act in a case registered at Kaptanganj Police Station, Azamgarh. The applicant argued that his criminal antecedents had been fully explained …

SHRI SANJAY SHERAWAT AND ANOTHERversusJOIN COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER

Petitioners Sanjay Sherawat and another challenged an adjudication order dated 25‑03‑2026 that imposed a penalty under section 122(2)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017. They submitted a supplementary affidavit showing that they had resigned as directors of M/s Daurli Ispat Pvt Ltd on the dates specified, …

SURESH CHAUHAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Suresh Chauhan and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The respondent's counsel and the Additional …

KAMLESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Kamlesh Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the charge‑sheet dated 25‑09‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 20‑01‑2026 in Case No. 264 of 2026 (State vs. Munni Devi). He relied on a prior application by co‑accused Ram Kumar (Application No. 24122 …

SUSHEEL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Susheel Kumar under Section 482 of the CrPC and the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, where he alleged false implication in a case involving two base cases in a gang chart. The applicant had no prior …

RAHUL ALIAS PAPPU AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the BNSS filed by Rahul alias Pappu and five others seeking to quash the charge sheet, summons and non‑bailable warrant in a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 354, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry …

MANOJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Manoj Kumar was charged under Sections 8, 20 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 in Crime No. 248 of 2026. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The Court noted that a co‑accused, Amir Khan, had already been released on bail in a similar case (Criminal …

RAJNEESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rajneesh, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 87 of 2026) under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on police rivalry, that he is not a gang member, and that he had …

RAHULversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Rahul was arrested in connection with a case under IPC sections 69, 115(2), 351(3) and 352, alleged to have established a physical relationship with a married woman by falsely promising marriage, administered drugs, and caused a miscarriage. The victim’s statements under CrPC sections 180 and 183 …

MAHENDRA PRASADversusSANJAY DUBEY AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of a High Court order dated 24‑11‑2025 directing the removal of an illegal encroachment on public utility land, an order that had been issued in a public interest litigation (P.I.L.) and upheld on appeal under Section 67 of the …

SACHINversusSTATE OF U.P.

Sachin, the applicant, was charged under Sections 8 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act in Crime No. 116 of 2026, Muzaffarnagar. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court noted that a co‑accused, Rahul, had already been released on bail in a similar …

YASH SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Yash Sharma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge sheet filed against them by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The State’s Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation was complete and …

NOORIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Noori sought bail in a NDPS case (sections 8, 20, 29) while the trial was pending. The court noted that an accused's prior criminal history cannot, by itself, justify continued detention if bail criteria are otherwise satisfied. The court observed that a co‑accused, Amir Khan, had …

NOORIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Noori, who is charged under Sections 8, 21(C) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The applicant’s criminal history was explained, and the court noted that antecedents alone cannot justify continued detention if …

MERAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Meraj, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 after a charge sheet was lodged. The learned Additional Government Advocate argued that the alleged offences do not carry a punishment exceeding seven years, so there was no fear of arrest. The applicant’s counsel …

HARUNversusSTATE OF U.P.

Harun applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 473 of 2026) charged under Sections 109(1), 3(5) of the BNS and Section 3/11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. The court noted that a co‑accused, Rihan, had already been released on bail in a similar case, and, without delving into the …

OMENDRA @ OGENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The learned Additional Government Advocate objected that the applicant had not disclosed his complete criminal antecedents as mandated by Chapter XVIII, Rule 18(7) of the Rules of the Court. The applicant's …

BRAJMOHAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 29‑12‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 09‑04‑2026 in Criminal Case No.511 of 2026. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 324(4) and 352 of the BNSS are …

VINESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant sought a direction under Section 528 of the CrPC for the trial court to accept a personal bail bond and two sureties in five cases where bail had already been granted. The court queried whether the applicant had previously offered such bonds and whether the trial court had specifically …

MANGAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Mangal Singh, a Home Guard, was arrested on a FIR alleging that he stole a service revolver, invoking Sections 305(e) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He filed a bail application claiming innocence, false implication, and lack of independent evidence, and has been in custody since 17 June 2026. …

RANI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rani Devi, who was accused of misappropriating a family pension of Rs. 20,32,771 and facing charges under various IPC sections, CrPC Section 482, and IT Act Section 66(D). The applicant claimed she was falsely implicated, had …

ARBAJversusSTATE OF U.P.

Arbaj applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 385 of 2026, which is filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that the prosecution was based on a single criminal case shown in a gang chart for which he had …

ABHISHEK SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Abhishek Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the B.N.S. After hearing, he sought to withdraw the application and instead move a regular bail application in the pending criminal case. The State opposed the request, but the learned Additional Government …

ILMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ilma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel announced that they did not wish to pursue the present petition and sought to withdraw it, requesting …

MOHD. SALEEMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Mohd. Saleem filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash two orders dated 05.01.2026 and 19.06.2026 issued by the Family Court, Muzaffarnagar, which authorized a recovery warrant for arrears of maintenance in a case arising under Section 128 of the Criminal Procedure Code. …

VIVEK NISHAD AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 24‑06‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 01‑04‑2026 in Criminal Case No.5256 of 2026. They contended that the offences alleged—Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the BNSS—are …

SHAURYA PRATAP @ SHANUversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shaurya Pratap, accused in Crime No. 297 of 2026 under Section 109(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, applied for bail. The case involved a police firing in which the applicant himself sustained a gunshot injury. The learned counsel explained the applicant’s criminal …

RAHUL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a case involving multiple IPC offences including kidnapping, extortion and assault. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that no incriminating material was found on him, while the …

CHHAYA NISHAD AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Chhaya Nishad and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 22‑02‑2026 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 17‑06‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 33393 of 2026. They contended that the offences …

SABIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sabir under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, in a case involving mutual violence that resulted in injuries to eleven persons. The applicant argued he had no criminal antecedents and that no specific role was assigned to him, citing …

RAJIV KAPOORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rajiv Kapoor, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 26‑05‑2026 in Criminal Case No.4526 of 2026. The ground relied upon was that the charge‑sheet alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) …

SUJIT KUMAR GHOSHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sujit Kumar Ghosh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC after a charge sheet was filed. The Additional Government Advocate argued that the alleged offences, punishable with less than seven years’ imprisonment, did not create a risk of arrest. The …

SUDAMA PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sudama Pandey in a 2019 case involving alleged misappropriation of food grains under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477-A, 120B and 34 of the IPC. Pandey contended that he was a fair‑price shop dealer, the FIR was lodged after a …

GOPIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Gopi applied for bail in criminal case No. 288 of 2026, which involves offences under Sections 85, 352, 115(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, filed at Kotwali Dehat police station, Mirzapur. The applicant’s criminal history was explained and no injury to …

RAJBIR SINGH TYAGI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the B.N.S., 2023, fearing arrest in a criminal case (Crime No. 380 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2) and 351(2) of the same Act. The Attorney General objected, contending that the offences do …

SHANKARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Shankar, filed a bail application under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, seeking release while his trial is pending. He contended that the case against him was based on a single criminal charge shown in a gang chart, for which he had …

AJAY KUMAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ajay Kumar Shukla filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 10‑Nov‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 20‑Jan‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings in State v. Ajay Kumar Shukla (Case No. 2186 of 2026). The High Court …

VIVEK SHRIVASTAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Vivek Shrivastav filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 21‑03‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 29‑05‑2026 in Case No. 1454 of 2026, which alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) (i.e., IPC 420 and 406) along with other …

ZEESHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicants, Zeeshan and Gulistana, claimed they were falsely implicated and that …

HAR VILASH @ PAPPUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 of the IPC. The applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead move a regular bail application before …

RITIKversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ritik, accused in a case under several IPC sections including assault and attempted murder. The FIR alleged that Ritik, as a pillion rider, assaulted a traffic police constable who was pursuing him, causing minor head injury. The …

AKRAM BEGversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ak Ram Beg, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged rape, attempt to murder, drug possession and an obscene video of the victim. The applicant claimed false implication due to business rivalry, highlighted the …

MUKHTAR @ MUKHTARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Mukhtar, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 186 of 2026) under Sections 2(b)(17) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on a single case already listed in a gang chart for which …

UPENDAR SHAHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered the bail application of Upendar Shah, who was charged in Crime No. 305 of 2025 under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and a provision of the B.N.S. The applicant, …

SALIMversusSTATE OF U.P.

Salim applied for bail in Crime No. 19 of 2026 under Sections 2(b)(xvii) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on police rivalry, that he is not a gang member, and that he has already been granted bail in related …

NITIN KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants Nitin Kumar and three others were charged under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Dowry Prohibition Act in a case pending before the Bijnor court. They filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC s.482, which the Assistant Government Advocate contested on the ground that …

ANUPAMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 03.07.2024 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑I, Mirzapur, which had summoned them under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code in a private complaint. The counsel argued …

HAJI ABDUL RASHEED ANSARI AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet and related proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 504, 506, 354 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court …

SMT SUMAYLAversusANKITA SHARMA, SENIOR SUPERINTENDETN OF POLICE, AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt Sumayla, filed a contempt application alleging that the respondent, Senior Superintendent of Police Ankita Sharma, had failed to comply with a writ order dated 04.12.2014 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 52588 of 2014 (Razeena Bano v. State of U.P.). The learned counsel for the …

SMT. INDRANI DEVI AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the entire proceeding of a complaint and a summoning order dated 30.04.2026. They contended that the complaint originated from an application under Section 173(4) B.N.S.S., which the magistrate incorrectly treated …

RAMKAILASHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered the bail application of Ramkailash, who is accused under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 in a case registered in 2017. The applicant claimed innocence, stating he was only a witness to a sale agreement and that a co‑accused had already been granted bail, invoking …

VINAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Vinay Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a charge under Section 337 of the B.N.S. The Attorney General objected, arguing that the offence does not carry a punishment exceeding seven years, the charge‑sheet had already been …

NANDLAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. After the charge sheet was submitted, the petitioners’ counsel prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) raised no objection to …

BADARI PRASAD GUPTA @ MAMA BROKERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Badari Prasad Gupta filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the chargesheet and cognizance order dated 22.11.2024 in State v. Vijay Rastogi, which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. The applicant argued, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race …

SHIV KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shiv Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 126 of 2026) under Sections 2(B)(1) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that the charges were based on police rivalry, that he had already been granted bail in eight …

CHANDRA PRAKASH GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Chandra Prakash Gupta was arrested in connection with an FIR dated 18‑06‑2026 alleging dowry demands, matrimonial atrocities and assault leading to a miscarriage, filed by his wife. The applicant contended that the FIR was false, filed after a three‑month delay, and that a doctor’s report showed no …

ISTAKAR @ NIKLIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Istakar @ Nakli, sought bail in a NDPS case (Crime No.153 of 2026) charged under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The court considered his criminal history, which was explained, and noted that bail cannot be denied solely on antecedents. It observed that a co‑accused, Rashid, …

VINAY PRAKASH MADHESHIYA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the order dated 23‑09‑2022 that framed charges against them in a criminal case (Case No. 5404 of 2017) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. …

KUNAL @ KUNAL GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Kunal Gupta filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside an order dated 31.01.2026 that had issued both a recovery warrant and an arrest warrant for the enforcement of arrears of maintenance. The maintenance was originally granted to his wife under Section 125 of the …

SAGUFTA ISHRARversusPURVANCHAL VIDHUT VITRANA NIGAM LTD AND ANOTHER

Sagufta Ishrar filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 35438 of 2026) against Purvanchal Vidhut Vitrana Nigam Ltd and another respondent. The respondent, represented by N.K. Tiwari, placed on record instructions dated 24‑08‑2026. After hearing arguments, the petitioner’s counsel prayed that the petition …

SMT. SHIVPATTI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt. Shivpatti Devi filed a writ petition under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, seeking expeditious disposal of Suit No.19022 of 2026 (Shivpatti v. Kedarnath Tripathi). The petition highlighted that the lower court had only fixed general dates and had not set a timeline for …

UMESH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Umesh Yadav, filed a bail application under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, seeking release while his trial (Crime No. 143 of 2026) is pending. He contended that the prosecution was based on a single criminal case already resulting …

SURENDRA KUMAR ALIAS MOOLAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Surendra Kumar alias Moola in a case under Section 107 of the B.N.S., alleging abetment to suicide. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing out a three‑day delay in lodging the FIR and the lack of any direct act of …

SURAJ PASWANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Suraj Paswan, who was arrested in a rape case (CrPC Sec. 64(1), 351(3)) and had been in custody since July 15, 2026. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to material contradictions between the victim’s statements under …

VIKASH PRAJAPATI @ CHOTU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Vikash Prajapati and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court after a charge-sheet was filed against them on 5 July 2026. They later sought to withdraw the petition, stating they would approach the appropriate forum later. The State's …

ASHUTOSH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ashutosh Singh, who was arrested in a case under the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that the charges were based on a single criminal case already listed in a gang chart and …

SULOCHANA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 11‑07‑2026 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them under several penal provisions. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that …

ONKAR SAHAIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Onkar Sahai applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 CrPC in connection with offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The learned Additional Government Advocate argued that the offences do not attract imprisonment exceeding seven years, a …

LAXMI KANT SINGHversusSHRI RAJEEV KUMAR SINGH, CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, PHOOLPUR

Laxmi Kant Singh filed a contempt application against Rajeev Kumar Singh, a Consolidation Officer, alleging willful defiance of a High Court order dated 06‑12‑2024 in Writ B No.4286 of 2024. The court noted that a certified copy of the order had been served but the opposite party had not complied. …

GULVEJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant was arrested along with two co‑accused after police intercepted a vehicle carrying 2,845 bottles of Wenrex cough syrup, a codeine‑based preparation, without a licence. The applicant claimed the syrup was not a narcotic because it fell under Entry 35 of the Central Government …

SUDHIR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 CrPC for Sudhir Yadav, who was not named in the FIR but was later implicated in a case under the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, and certain provisions of the …

RAVI KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ravi Kumar and Danveer, entered into an agreement to issue a series of cheques to the informant, but the informant lodged an FIR alleging criminal offences despite the agreement. The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the B.N.S., 2023, claiming the dispute was …

DILEEP KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Dileep Kumar and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 22‑12‑2025, the cognizance order dated 15‑04‑2026, and the entire proceedings in a criminal case pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, …

RAJ BAHADUR ALIAS BAURA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that they no longer wish to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The respondent's counsel, the Additional Government Advocate, raised no …

SHALINI CHAURASIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Shalini Chaurasiya filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar (respondent No.2) to decide a pending revenue suit (Suit No. 12618/2025) filed in August 2025 under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that …

NEELESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Neelesh Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the criminal proceedings against him. The State disclosed that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 28 May 2026. The petitioner did not contest these …

KRISHNAMOHAN KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Krishnamohan Kushwaha, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Superintendent of Police (respondent No.2) and another official (respondent No.3) to ensure a fair and impartial investigation in a case registered on 04-04-2026. The petitioner …

ARJUN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Arjun Singh, charged with offences under Sections 147, 148, 427 IPC and Section 4 of the Government Property Damages Act, had been absconding since 2004 and earlier obtained a three‑week interim protection under Section 528 CrPC, which he failed to act upon. He subsequently filed an anticipatory …

GOVIND TOMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Govind Tomar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel announced that he no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The …

SMT TANU MAVI CORPUS AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a habeas corpus petition filed by Smt. Tanu Mavi and another seeking her production, after the State and a respondent were ordered to produce her. The corpus, an 18‑year‑old graduate, testified that she voluntarily married Sandeep on 16‑04‑2026 but now wishes to live with …

HAZARI PRASAD SONKARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Hazari Prasad Sonkar, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 193 of 2025) under Sections 3, 5A, and 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 of the Prevention of Animal Cruelty Act. The court considered the applicant’s criminal history, which was explained, and noted …

ANASversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Anas, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case where a charge sheet had been filed against him for cheating under Section 413 IPC, in addition to earlier charges under Sections 411 and 414 IPC. The applicant claimed false implication and asserted …

BUDDHU @ FAIZANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Buddhu @ Faizan, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2(b)(17) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the charges were fabricated due to police rivalry and that he had already been granted bail in …

ARUN BABUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Arun Babu, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 230 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 331(4) and 109 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act. He is the son of the informant, who is …

ABHISHEKversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Abhishek, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with Crime No. 373 of 2026. The applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead move a regular bail application before the concerned court. The …

DIVYANSHU PANDEY @ HAPPY AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 159479 of 2025, alleging false implication and claiming that the underlying personal dispute has been amicably resolved. They requested that the case be dismissed on the basis of a compromise between …

MAYAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Maya, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 20035 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging an ongoing criminal proceeding. The State of Uttar Pradesh had already concluded its investigation and filed a charge-sheet against the petitioner on 24 March 2026. …

DABLU KUMAR SUNARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dablu Kumar Sunar in a criminal case (Crime No.230 of 2026) under Sections 317(2), 317(4) and 111(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was arrested based on an informer's tip, and that the recovered ornaments …

SURAJ GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Suraj Gupta filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The police subsequently submitted a charge-sheet in the underlying criminal case. Upon learning of the charge-sheet, the petitioner's counsel, Brajesh Kumar Singh, moved that the writ petition be dismissed as …

RAVI PRATAPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 16 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ravi Pratap, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) informed the Court that a final report in the matter had been submitted. Both the petitioner’s counsel, Atul Kumar, and the respondent’s …

ROHIT @ JAIHINDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rohit @ Jaihind under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a FIR alleging his involvement in a gang that promised government jobs for money. The applicant’s name appeared only in the confessional statements …

SMT. FULMATI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Fulmati Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Superintendent of Police and other officials to complete a fair and impartial investigation into FIR No. 91 of 2026 and to refrain from arresting her. She alleged that the police were not …

HASAM ALI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Hasam Ali and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The State of Uttar Pradesh submitted that the police investigation was completed and a report filed on 28 June 2026. The petitioners did not contest this fact but expressed a …

YUSUFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Yusuf, sought bail in a case under Sections 64(2)(Ka) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3, 4, and 5J(ii) of the POCSO Act, alleging that a DNA report showed he was not the biological father of the victim's child. The State opposed bail, emphasizing that eight witnesses had already …

PARASNATH KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Parasnath Kushwaha, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 in a case involving alleged offences under IPC Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) relating to a disputed sale deed. The first bail application was rejected because the applicant failed to …

RAM KUMAR AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ram Kumar and five others in a case where a FIR, lodged three days after the alleged incident, accused them of assaulting a village Pradhan and his brother. The petitioners argued that the injuries were not life‑threatening, the FIR …

SAMEERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sameer, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, fearing arrest in a case involving mutual assault between two parties where 23 persons were named in the FIR. He argued that he was falsely implicated, had no specific role assigned, and possessed no …

MANOJ AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Manoj and two others under CrPC Section 482 in a criminal case (Crime No.259 of 2026) involving alleged offences under several IPC sections. The applicants claimed false implication, noting a 15‑day delay in filing the …

JUGENDRA @ CHHOTEversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Jugendra @ Chhote, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with Crime No.168 of 2026. After hearing, the applicant’s counsel sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead move a regular bail application, …

NADEEM KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Nadeem Khan under CrPC Section 482 in connection with a FIR alleging his participation in a large-scale protest that resulted in public property damage. The FIR named 25 individuals and 1,700 unnamed persons, but the …

RAKESH MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rakesh Mishra under Section 482 CrPC in a case where he was named in the FIR for allegedly threatening an informant, while the principal assault charge was against his brother. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated …

AJAY PARMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ajay Parmar, sought anticipatory bail in a case where his father, a co-accused, had allegedly sold property to an informant and deposited part of the consideration in Ajay's account. The informant later filed an affidavit stating that the sale deed had been executed in favour of his …

AKASH CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Akash Chauhan, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He asserted that he was falsely implicated, noting that only a single base case appears against him in the gang …

TASVEER AHMAD ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Tasveer Ahmad Ali applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC s.482, claiming fear of arrest in a criminal case involving IPC offences. The State opposed, arguing the offences do not carry imprisonment exceeding seven years, a charge‑sheet has been filed and there is no apprehension of arrest, …

CHANDRABHAN SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Chandrabhan Singh Yadav, who had been granted anticipatory bail in eight criminal cases, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking a direction that the trial courts accept two common bail bonds for all those cases. The court examined whether the applicant had ever …

RAJKUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The High Court examined a habeas corpus petition filed by Rajkumar alleging that the corpus, Smt. Anjani Kushwaha, was being illegally detained and that a marriage existed between them. The corpus, a 23‑year‑old woman, testified that she has never married the petitioner and is lawfully married to …

INDRAJEET KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Indrajeet Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 299 of 2025) alleging embezzlement of pre‑deposit amounts of two bank customers, filed under Sections 316(5) and 351(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, stating that the FIR was lodged by a bank …

KUMAIL ABBAS AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered two anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The first applicant, Kumail Abbas, had already been arrested, rendering his application infructuous, and it was dismissed. The second applicant, Hasan Raza, sought anticipatory …

GURUVACHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Guruvachan was arrested on 13‑12‑2024 in connection with FIR No. filed on 06‑12‑2024 alleging offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 117(3) of the Indian Penal Code, including assault with a knife that resulted in the victim losing part of his ear. The victim and his wife initially …

ASHA YADAV AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Asha Yadav and two other teachers under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC relating to alleged embezzlement of grant money from a madarsa. The …

PANKAJ GOPALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Pankaj Gopal, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Allahabad High Court under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant’s counsel, Dhruva Dixit, subsequently moved the court seeking permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request …

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ashok Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 324 of 2013) involving offences under Sections 419, 420 and 468 of the IPC. The applicant sought relief to avoid arrest and asked for …

YASH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under CrPC Section 482 on behalf of Yash (applicant No.1) in a case involving alleged violence between two rival groups. The FIR named twelve accused and six to seven unknown persons, but no specific role was assigned to the applicant, …

RAJE @ RAJARAM AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 10‑02‑2026 and a cognizance order dated 04‑07‑2026 issued by a Judicial Magistrate in Bijnor. They contended that the offences alleged—Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNS—are non‑cognizable …

SAURABH CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Saurabh Chauhan, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. Act seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 16‑07‑2024 and the cognizance‑summoning order dated 11‑10‑2024 in Criminal Case No. 15427/2024, which alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The …

ISHTEQARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ishteqar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After filing, the petitioner informed the court that he had already been arrested and no longer wished to pursue the writ, seeking to withdraw it. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised …

KUNWAR ASIF ALI KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kunwar Asif Ali Khan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Superintendent of Police (respondent No.2) and another respondent to conduct a free, fair, and expeditious investigation into an FIR dated 11‑12‑2025 under Sections 333, 308(4), 351(3) …

DEVENDRA SINGHversusSMT. ARTI SINGH AND ANOTHER

Devendra Singh filed a contempt application alleging that Smt. Arti Singh and another willfully defied the order dated 04-12-2014 issued in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 52588 of 2014 (Razeena Bano v. State of U.P.). The court was shown instructions dated 05-09-2026 along with FIR No. 0164 of 2026, …

BELAL AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioner Belal Ahmad sought an order for expeditious disposal of a pending civil suit (Case No. 20018 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The court observed that the lawyers involved in the suit were on strike, causing no progress in the proceedings. Relying on the Supreme Court's decision …

DHANDEVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dhandev in a criminal case (Crime No. 376/2025) involving alleged offences under the IPC and the NDPS Act for the procurement and alleged sale of codeine‑based cough syrups. The prosecution’s case centered on the main accused, Shivam Dwivedi, who …

UMAKANT YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Umakant Yadav, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a criminal case involving alleged forgery and cheating related to a land dispute in Jaunpur. The prosecution alleged that a forged entry dated 26‑10‑1994 was entered in consolidation …

NARESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash criminal proceedings (ST No.21 of 2020) arising from offences under IPC sections 323, 506 and 308. The parties had already reached a compromise, which was verified by the Additional District and Sessions Judge on 26‑05‑2026 and …

RACHIT KULSHRESHTHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The appellant Rachit Kulshreshtha filed a special appeal against an order dated 23 July 2026 in which a Single Judge, while noting that a counter‑affidavit was required, failed to decide the appellant’s stay application and merely listed the matter for 8 September 2026. The appellant relied on the …

RAVINDRA SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 10 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash the order dated 8 July 2026 that rejected their restoration application against a decree dated 8 September 2018. They argued that the impugned order was passed without considering the facts, despite an interim …

MADHU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court was petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus to produce Madhu, a 21‑year‑old woman, who had been detained by the police. Upon production, Madhu testified that she had voluntarily married Jai Prakash Kumar on 8 June 2026 and wished to live with him. The petitioner, Jai Prakash Kumar, …

VIPIN KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 19971 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of …

ROHIT YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Rohit Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 4‑8‑2026 under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. During the hearing the petitioner limited his relief to protection under Section 41‑A of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 35 of the …

HASHMAT HUSAINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Hashmat Husain, was arrested in connection with a case under IPC sections 308(2), 336(3) and 338 and has been in custody since 08‑06‑2026. He contended that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR, and that his involvement was discovered only during investigation. The …

ALOKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHER

The petitioner Alok filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of U.P. and two others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The …

RATAN RAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ratan Raj Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 CrPC, which was rejected by the Sessions Judge. He then sought permission to appear before the concerned court and apply for regular bail, requesting protection from any coercive action during the interim. The State opposed the request, …

YAHIYA URF YAHYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Yahiya Urf Yahya applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 465 of 2026) filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on two earlier cases in a gang chart for which he had already been released on …

KESHAV RAM @ MANJESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Keshav Ram @ Manjesh applied for bail in a kidnapping case (Crime No. 278 of 2026) while the trial is pending. He was implicated based solely on a co-accused Uttam Bajpai’s statement linking him to other child‑trafficking cases, which are not part of the present charge. The State argued …

SATYAM KHARWARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Satyam Kharwar, filed a second bail application in a case involving alleged sharp‑weapon injury to Raju Kumar under IPC sections 109, 115(2), 352 and 351(3). The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR lacked specific details, and that he had no criminal record, …

MANOJ KUMAR PATELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manoj Kumar Patel filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State authorities to recover his lost motorcycle, associated money and documents, and to compel the respondent to decide his representation dated 11 June 2026. The petitioner alleged that the motorcycle …

SATENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 8 OTHERS

Petitioner Satendra Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Board of Revenue, U.P. Circuit Court Meerut to decide Revision No. 358 of 2025 (Amaruddin & others v. Satendra Singh & others) under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a fixed period. The petition …

VINOD KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioners, former employees, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to pay arrears of salary from June 2003 to their retirement and to compel the District Administrative Committee (DAC) to decide their representation. The respondents argued that the grievance should be …

RAJENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajendra Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against him. The State of U.P. and others filed a charge-sheet, after which the petitioner's counsel, Vijay Tripathi, moved that the writ petition be dismissed as not pressed. The Court considered that …

ASHRAFversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ashraf, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 427 of 2023) under Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosives Substance Act. The court noted that the applicant’s criminal history had been explained and that a co‑accused, Naushad, had already been released on bail in a similar case. Relying …

RAM KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ram Kumar and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 540 of 2026) relating to offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the BNSS and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …

MOHAMMAD ALI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants, Mohammad Ali and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Citizens Security Code seeking relief from a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued under Section 138(B) of the Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2019 in case No. 520/2019. The NBW was issued because the …