Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 6801–7000
The petition filed by minor Rishu Tiwari @ Shashwat Tripathi sought to quash an FIR dated 21‑07‑2026 that alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the POCSO Act. The petitioner later limited relief to protection under Section 41‑A of the CrPC and Section 35 of the Bharatiya …
The applicant, Golden @ Ehsan Ahmad, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC after being falsely implicated in an assault case where he was not named in the FIR. The State opposed bail, arguing the applicant's name appeared in injured parties' statements and citing his prior criminal …
The petitioners, Firdaus and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 12 July 2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.). During the hearing they limited their relief to protection under section …
Rakesh Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking a fresh passport. The applicant relied on a prior order dated 17 July 2025 in which interim protection for passport issuance had been extended in a related application (No. 22997 of 2025). The Union of India contended that the …
The applicants, Sonu alias Ajay and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the pending Special Case No. 827 of 2025, which arose from crime No. 967 of 2019 involving offences under the IPC (sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n)) and …
Hdb Financial Service Limited filed a contempt application against Ashwani Kumar, Station House Officer, alleging a breach of a prior order. The applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the application on the ground of an inherent defect, requesting liberty to file a fresh application. The High Court …
The applicants filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, the Collector/District Magistrate, willfully disobeyed the order dated 01‑04‑2026 issued in Civil Misc. Writ (C) Petition No. 12257 of 2026. The court examined the claim and found a prima facie case of contempt for …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohammad Fahad, who was arrested at Cheeoki Railway Station for allegedly possessing 477 bottles of codeine‑based cough syrup. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the forensic lab report did not confirm the presence of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against them. The learned Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed against the petitioners. The petitioners' counsel then prayed for dismissal of the writ petition on …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the second respondent to decide a representation dated 20-07-2026, as mandated by a civil judge's order dated 28-01-2025. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed, and this request …
The petitioner, Jitendra Patel, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but after being informed that the charge sheet had been submitted, he requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed, reserving the right to pursue any other legal remedy. The respondent State of …
The applicant, Gaurav, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the charges were based on police rivalry and that he had already been granted bail in six related cases, asserting he …
The petitioner, Usman, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) to decide Original Suit No. 73 of 2025 within a stipulated period. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) …
The petitioners, two adults who have married of their own free will, sought a writ of mandamus directing that no one, including family members, interfere with their peaceful married life and that they be provided protection. They submitted school mark sheets to prove majority and affidavits …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 challenging a stay order issued by the appellate Commissioner, who had admitted an appeal by respondent No. 4 and stayed the Sub‑Divisional Officer’s order allowing measurement of gata No. 99. The Sub‑Divisional …
Petitioner Rajesh Kumar Goswami filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 22‑02‑2026 under sections 125(b) and 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and later limited his relief to protection under section 41‑A of the CrPC and section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …
The petitioners, Tara Yadav and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court after a charge sheet was submitted in their case. They later moved the court to dismiss the writ petition as not pressed, indicating they might seek other legal remedies. The respondent …
The petitioner, a railway employee, was promoted to Shunting Master Grade‑I after qualifying a departmental exam, but was later charged with using unfair means because another candidate had written his answer sheet. An inquiry was held during which the petitioner unconditionally confessed to the …
Petitioner Usha Devi filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate to enforce a revenue order dated 16‑Oct‑2023, which had ordered the demarcation of her property under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Although boundary pillars were …
The petitioner, Ved Prakash Sharma, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to transfer him from Bijnor to any of the districts of Ghaziabad, Hapur, Meerut or Gautam Buddha Nagar. He had submitted a representation for transfer which was pending consideration. The …
The petitioner, Mahesh Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to transfer him from Pilibhit district to Lakhimpur Kheri district in accordance with the applicable Transfer Policy and to decide his pending representation dated 06.05.2026 within a stipulated period. The …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court of Allahabad in the name of the deceased, Mithlesh Shakya, seeking relief against the State of U.P. No amendment application was filed, and the stamp reporter did not note any defect. The court examined whether a petition filed in the name of a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jahid, who is accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 248 of 2026) under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2). The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false recovery, and pointed out the absence of independent witnesses, while noting that …
The applicant Amit Soam filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 22‑01‑2024 in a case where he was charged under Sections 420 and 406 IPC. The applicant argued, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club Ltd. v. …
Akash was arrested in connection with a case registered as Crime No. 62 of 2026, alleged to have violated Sections 137(2), 87, 61(2), 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code, Section 17 of the POCSO Act and Section 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained a contempt application filed by M/s Paramhans Furnitures Pvt. Ltd. against Anil Kumar Sharma for alleged willful disobedience of a judgment dated 17‑02‑2026. The applicant’s counsel produced an order of the Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) Dy. …
The petitioner sought amendment of the prayer clause and impleadment of a revenue officer as a respondent. Both applications were allowed as the opposite parties raised no objection. The core dispute concerns a co‑owned, un‑partitioned property where the petitioner claims ownership, while the …
The petitioners Kanhai and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 16 July 2026 that alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and the SC/ST Act. During the hearing they limited their relief to a protection order under section 35 of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharat Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to set aside a charge sheet filed under IPC Section 420 and IT Act Section 66, and an order of the Small Cause Court dated 29‑09‑2023. They contended that no offence was made out against them …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Haneef, who is accused in a criminal case under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2). The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false recovery, and pointed to the fact that co‑accused Javed and Abid had already been granted bail, seeking …
The petitioner R.K. Verma sought to quash an FIR dated 26 June 2026, registered under Section 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and later limited the relief to protection under Section 35 of the same Act. The Court examined the FIR and found it disclosed a cognizable offence, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita seeking relief from a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued after they failed to appear at a scheduled hearing in criminal case 79606/2025. The High Court examined the applicants' request to have the NBW …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajesh Sonkar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 8, 20, 27A, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the only reference to him was in a co‑accused’s confessional …
The applicant, Rajesh Sonkar, sought bail in a NDPS case (Crime No. 89 of 2025) alleging innocence and that his name appeared only in a co‑accused's confessional statement, which lacks evidentiary value. He argued that he was falsely implicated, that the police had lodged multiple cases against him …
Mohd. Nadeem filed a writ petition challenging a demand notice issued by the State of U.P. and other respondents. The respondents subsequently withdrew the demand notice and submitted a letter dated 7 September 2026 to the Additional District Magistrate, Finance & Revenue, Bareilly, confirming the …
Uman Khan filed a writ petition challenging a demand notice issued by the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The respondents later withdrew the demand notice and submitted a letter dated 7 September 2026 to the Additional District Magistrate, Finance & Revenue, Bareilly, confirming the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Pushpendra Kumar, who feared arrest in a case involving alleged manipulation of electronic weighing machines and misappropriation of sugarcane. The applicant was not named in the FIR, though co‑accused Bittu …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mawana, Meerut, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6-C) in Suit No. 49 of 2011. The petitioners argued that the injunction application had remained undecided for an …
Petitioners Smt Pooja and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) informed the Court that a final report had been submitted. Both the petitioners' counsel and the respondent's counsel agreed that the …
Priyanka filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging a July 1, 2025 order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baghpat, which dismissed her application under Section 173(4) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for registration of an FIR. The petition sought direct High …
The applicant, Smt. Savitri Devi, filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. Her counsel, Rama Pati Tripathi, moved the court to withdraw the application, seeking liberty to pursue any appropriate proceedings later. The court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal of …
The petitioners, 33 teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to pay their salaries and arrears pursuant to a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026 and to decide pending representations, citing a prior judgment of 30‑04‑2025. The respondents …
The petitioners sought a direction under Article 227 for the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Azamgarh to dispose of suit No. 1272 of 2024 within a short, fixed period. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which limits …
Priyanka Advocate filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baghpat, which dismissed her application under Section 173(4) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for registration of an FIR. The petition sought direct …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anurag Mishra, who was arrested in connection with FIR alleging assault and robbery under several IPC sections. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he had no specific role, and highlighted that co‑accused had already been granted bail. …
Rakesh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR registered under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and later limited his relief to protection under Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR, found …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking speedy disposal of an application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the CPC, which was filed after the defendants allegedly violated a temporary injunction granted by the trial court. The High Court noted that the writ petition had no substantive issue to be …
The petitioners, Anuj Kumar Pandey and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 04‑07‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 352, 351(3), 75, 76, 333 of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. During the hearing the petitioners …
The petitioner, Jagat Pal Singh, filed a writ petition alleging that Respondent No.5 was illegally constructing on public land. He had previously submitted a representation to Respondent No.3, the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, on 11‑08‑2026, seeking redress. The court examined the submissions and …
The accused Praveen Kumar Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 58 of 2012) pending trial for offences under Sections 363 and 366 IPC. He alleged false implication, that no arrest had been made earlier, and that the complainant withdrew the complaint after the victim married. He …
Manisha Chauhan was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.172 of 2026) involving numerous offences under the Indian Penal Code, the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. She pleaded innocence, asserting that she had no specific role or overt act in …
The petitioner, Lal Mani, filed a writ petition challenging a notification dated 24 June 2026 ordering the re‑auction of Pond No. 589 in Village Bheski, Prayagraj. He claimed that a fishery lease had been granted to him for ten years starting 28 July 2022, and that he was ready to pay the balance …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Citizens Security Code seeking relief from a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in the pending case State Vs. Santosh Kumar @ Vishal and others (SST No. 319/2021). The warrant was issued because the applicant failed to appear before …
The applicant, Adesh, filed a bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 30485 of 2026 seeking release on bail for an additional charge under Section 64(2)(M) of the B.N.S. in Case Crime No. 94 of 2026. He contended that he was falsely implicated and that no incriminating material …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhim Rao, who is accused under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B and 34 in a land‑allotment dispute case. The applicant claimed innocence, stating he merely implemented an order as a consolidation Lekhpal and had no role in the alleged …
Petitioners Kapil Dhama and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 26 July 2026 that alleged offences under sections 351(2), 352, 351(3) and 351(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. While initially seeking quashal, they later limited their relief to …
Usman Ali applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC Section 482 in connection with FIR No. 67/2025 alleging offences under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2). He claimed innocence, asserted that the charges were filed out of personal enmity, and argued that no reliable evidence …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Suraj Thakur in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 30419 of 2026, relating to FIR No. 231 of 2026 involving alleged extortion and multiple IPC offences. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming false implication and no evidence of …
The applicant, Shitla Prasad Tiwari, sought bail in a case filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that the charges were a result of police rivalry and that he is not a gang member. He had already been granted bail in two …
Nirmala Devi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 20500 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings against her. The learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) informed the Court that a charge sheet had been submitted in the underlying criminal case. On this …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 01.07.2026 (Case Crime No. 0139 of 2026) and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted that the facts were similar to a prior …
The petitioners, Shaitan Singh Yadav and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of the criminal proceedings initiated against them under the Arms Act and NDPS Act. They argued that no offence was made out and that the prosecution was …
The applicant, Firoz, had been granted bail in eight separate criminal cases but was required to furnish a distinct personal bond and two sureties for each case. Unable to arrange eight sureties, he filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking the trial court’s direction to accept a …
Afsar Ahmad applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 19 of 2026) under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The High Court noted that a co‑accused, Anil Yadav, had already been released on bail in a similar proceeding (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 9125 of …
Yogesh Kumar Tiwari, a Lekhpal, was arrested for allegedly demanding Rs.10,000 for land measurement and was charged under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He has been in custody since July 1, 2026 and has no prior criminal record. The applicant sought bail, arguing that he would …
The applicant Neeti Agnihotri filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to set aside a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in connection with a case (State vs. Akhilesh & others, S. No. 4784/2019). The applicant argued that the NBW was issued because she …
Petitioners Karuna Pati Dubey and others filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Aurai, Bhadohi, to decide a pending restoration application filed under Section 209(h) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The restoration …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 08‑08‑2007, the cognizance and summoning order dated 11‑06‑2008, the non‑bailable warrant dated 26‑04‑2023, and the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No. 5835 of 2007. The High Court examined …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Harsh @ Heera in a criminal case (Crime No. 11 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 309(6), 317(4), 317(5) and 3(5) BNS. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that his name surfaced only through the statement of a …
Vikas, the applicant, was arrested in connection with Crime No. 473 of 2026 under IPC sections 310(2) and 317(3) and has been in jail since 21 June 2026. He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the alleged recovery from his possession lacked any independent …
Aman Singh filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in Crime No.0380 of 2026, fearing arrest. The State objected, arguing that the alleged offences do not attract a punishment exceeding seven years and that safeguards under Section 35(3) of the BNSS and Supreme Court rulings …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Regional Passport Officer in Lucknow to renew his passport (No. N1904025) promptly. The Regional Passport Office had issued a letter dated 05‑08‑2026 requiring the petitioner to appear in person with relevant …
The applicant, Nikit Gurjar, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and has no prior criminal record. He has been in custody since 30 …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Jashoda Devi, who feared arrest in a family‑dispute case involving alleged assault on Padma Verma and Sridevi. The FIR named six persons and alleged offences under …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Vikas @ Muddu, who feared arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 109, 115, 351, 352, 117 and 3 of the IPC. The applicant claimed false implication, noting …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which had earlier been rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge under the POCSO Act. They prayed for permission to appear before the concerned court and apply for regular bail, …
The applicant, Rehana, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside orders dated 18‑06‑2025 and 09‑07‑2026 that seized her vehicle under the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955. She claimed to be the registered owner of the vehicle and argued that its …
The applicant, Ravi Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 2183 of 2026, which arose from a chargesheet filed under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant claimed innocence and asserted that the …
Ram Krishna, a Collection Ameen, failed to meet his annual collection target, recovering less than half the required amount, and was suspended for about a month. A domestic inquiry was conducted, after which he was penalised with the loss of two increments and a censure entry. The appellant …
Awadesh Pathak filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 22‑06‑2026 under sections 318(4), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him. The petitioner also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down …
The petitioner, Vishwabandhu Gupta, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge (Small Cause Court), Gorakhpur, to expedite the hearing of SCC Suit No.4 of 2023. The petitioner, claiming to be the landlord in the suit, alleged that …
Petitioner Subash Chandra filed a writ petition challenging an order from a departmental inquiry. The petitioner's counsel conceded that, as a complainant, the petitioner lacked locus standi to contest the order. The respondent's counsel raised no objection to the petitioner's request to withdraw. …
Mohan Lal, accused in a land‑dispute case (Crime No. 305 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 191(2), 191(3), 190 and 109 of the IPC, applied for bail for the third time. He claimed false implication and pointed out that a co‑accused, Hetram, had already been released on …
The petitioner, Deen Dayal, filed a writ petition challenging an interim order dated 02‑07‑2026 issued by the Additional Commissioner, Judicial in Appeal No. 1172 of 2026 (Shyamveer et al. v. Deen Dayal et al.) under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner sought to set aside the …
The applicants, Sujauddin and another, sought bail in a criminal case under Sections 3, 5, 12 and 25 of the Arms Act arising from an incident in Meerut. The first applicant had no prior criminal record, while the second's alleged history was explained by counsel. The court noted that bail cannot be …
Petitioners Nadeem Khan and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of FIR No. 272 of 2026 and a mandamus to prevent their arrest under sections 85, 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the B.N.S. 2023 and the 3/4 D.P. Act. They prayed that the police, before making any arrest, …
The petitioners, M/s Vinod Kumar and Brothers, filed two writ petitions challenging orders passed in appeal and revision against a notice issued by the Mandi Samiti under the U.P. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti Niyamawali, 1965. They sought permission to withdraw the petitions, contending that they had …
The petition (Writ C No. 34996 of 2026) filed by M/s Vinod Kumar and Brothers against the State of U.P. and two others was heard by the Hon'ble Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery. Counsel for the petitioner was Awadhesh Kumar Mishra and counsel for the respondents were Archit Mandhyan, C.S.C. The court …
Rohit Shetthi applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 57 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 16 and 17 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the CrPC indicated that the applicant had no role in …
The applicant, Khushbo Sonkar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Trial No. 1503/2025) initiated under various statutes including the Indian Citizens Security Act, Pakso Act, and Income Tax Act. The applicant argued that no specific …
The petitioners sought to quash an FIR dated 08.08.2026 that alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and the SC/ST Act, later limiting relief to protection under section 35 of the B.N.S. The Court examined the FIR and found it disclosed a cognizable offence, citing Supreme …
The appellant, Ajeet Kumar Singh, was charged under the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for assaulting a victim and using a derogatory casteist slur. The prosecution relied on the victim’s statement, corroboration by independent …
The applicant, Nisar, was arrested in connection with a theft alleged to have occurred in a temple and is charged under Sections 305 and 331(4) of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the co-accused Jubair had disclosed his name without …
Petitioner Vinay Mishra filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Mirzapur, to decide his divorce case (No. 415 of 2024) filed under sections 13(1K), 13(1Kh) and (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner argued that the case …
Shivam Gupta, the adopted son of an informant, was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 206 of 2026) under Sections 305 and 317(2) of the IPC. He claimed the allegations were false, arising from a property dispute, and asserted he had no involvement in the alleged offences. The applicant, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kapil Rastogi, who is accused under Sections 418, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC in a case pending since 2022. The applicant claimed innocence, cited a compromise deed resolving the commercial dispute, and noted that a co‑accused's case had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jai Kishan Alias Jaico in Criminal Case No. 485 of 2026, where he was charged under Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code for allegedly snatching an informant's bag. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication …
The applicants Anil Khattar and others filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 51744 of 2023) arising from an FIR lodged on 6 February 2019 alleging that they, as directors of a school, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Krishna Chand Patel, who is accused in a case involving offences under IPC sections 305(a), 324(2), 351(3), 352, 331(4) and 317(2). The applicant claimed innocence, alleged a delayed FIR, lack of independent witnesses, and asserted that he would …
Petitioners Imran and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR registered on 10‑08‑2026 under sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing they limited their relief to protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya …
Manish Kumar was arrested in Mathura for allegedly possessing 13.670 kg of ganja, alleged under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the seized quantity was below the commercial threshold, …
The applicant, Rakesh Kumar Bind, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside a order dated 25‑11‑2025 passed by a Civil Judge in a case under the Uttar Pradesh Gauvandhan Nivaran Act. The applicant contended that no offence was made out as all eight …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in a criminal case where they were charged under Sections 420, 406 and 504 IPC. They argued that, according to the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Manoj, who is accused in Crime No. 717 of 2025 under multiple IPC sections including 190, 191, 109, 115, 117, 131, 324, 333, 351 and 352. Manoj contended that he was never named in the FIR and was implicated only through an informer, …
The petitioners, retired employees, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to decide their pending application and grant pensionary benefits and arrears. They relied on earlier High Court orders in Gorakh Nath Pandey (2016) and Maqsood Ali (2023) to support their claim. The …
The applicant, Ubaid Ulla, was arrested in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 103 of 2026) involving offences under IPC sections 318(2), 336(3), 338, and 340(2). He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and had no incriminating material recovered from his …
A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 20695 of 2026) was filed by Jagpal and three others against the State of U.P. and two others. The petitioners' counsel, Jitendra Kumar Yadav, failed to appear even after a revised call. Respondent counsel, including C.P. Pandey and the Additional …
The applicant, Sagar Mathew, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 564 of 2022) arising from a POCSO case involving offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 1179 of 2010, which involved offences under Sections 143, 186, 506, 147, 148, 353 and 504 of the IPC. The parties had earlier been directed by this Court to obtain a court‑verified …
The accused, Rajdeep Kumar, owner of a cricket ground, was arrested in connection with an assault on Rahul Singh that allegedly occurred when the ground was not vacated after the booked time. The FIR, filed on 27‑02‑2026, named four persons and an anonymous individual, and the accused faced multiple …
The petitioners, Dharmendra Kumar and others, filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of an order dated 20‑Nov‑2025 issued in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 25573 of 2025, which directed them to reply to a demolition notice within four weeks and barred coercive action for three months. …
The plaintiff filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction to prevent the defendants from interfering with his possession of a property. The trial court, on 5 September 2025, granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from any interference, including construction activities. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Session Case No. 954 of 2022, which stemmed from Crime No. 663 of 2017 involving offences under Sections 452, 307, 323, 325, 504 and 506 of the IPC. Earlier, the High Court had directed the parties …
Vijay Kumar Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (IPC sections 419, 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120B and IT Act section 66D) that arose from FIR No. 0718/2021. He contended that no offence was made out, the prosecution was malicious, the FIR was …
Shrikant Sharma, an Assistant Teacher who has been functioning as Officiating Principal (Karyawahak) since 1 July 2019, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to pay him the salary of a regular Principal for the period he acted in that …
A writ petition under Article 227 was filed by Smt. Babita Goswami and another seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gautam Buddh Nagar, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 1398 of 2024. The petitioners contended that the injunction application …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sapna Gupta, the wife of a deceased person, who was charged under Sections 108, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged abetment of suicide and related offences. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged belatedly, the post‑mortem …
The applicants, Janki Painter and Ranjeet Singh, were charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Criminal Law Amendment Act and the Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act. They applied for bail during the pendency of the trial, having missed a court appearance on 25‑05‑2026 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 684 of 2005) relating to offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 of the IPC and Section 3(1)(xii) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. …
Petitioner Abhay Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Principal Family Court, Kanpur Dehat, to decide his divorce case (No. 279 of 2024) under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had …
Garima Srivastava and another filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No. 470/2025 and the subsequent civil suit No. 5401/2026. They contended that no offence was made out, the prosecution was malicious, and there was no direct evidence against …
The Committee of Management of M/S Ram Lakhan Bhatt International School filed a writ petition challenging a finding on the number of employees in the institution. The petitioners did not first pursue the appeal provision under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking an order for the speedy disposal of a temporary injunction application (15-C) filed in the original suit No. 2545 of 2024. The High Court noted that the petition offered no substantive issue for adjudication and that the matter could be …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the speedy disposal of an amendment application and a temporary injunction application pending before the lower court in Case No. 636 of 2023. The petition sought only an order directing the lower court to expedite those applications. …
Petitioners Ashok Yadav and another filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an FIR dated 7‑8‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 115(2), 351(3), 304 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing they limited their relief to protection under …
Rishabh Sharma filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS challenging a sanction order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muradabad, in a case instituted under Sections 3/25 of the Arms Act and 9(k)/1(k) of the Explosive Substances Act. The applicant alleged that no offence was made out …
The petitioner, Haripal Singh, filed a writ petition seeking relief. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court considered the prayer and found no merit in proceeding further. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the …
The High Court considered the bail application of Gulzar, who was in custody since 20 June 2026 in a case under IPC sections 109(1), 333, 131 and 351(3). The applicant's counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, that the injuries were not life‑threatening, and that a co‑accused had already been …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak Nishad, who is accused in Crime No. 74 of 2026 under IPC sections 109(1), 117(2), 352, 351(2) and 324(4). The applicant pleaded innocence, citing a medical report that classified two injuries as simple and one as grievous, and argued that …
The applicant, Brijesh Pal, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking discharge in criminal case No. 557/2026. He argued that he is innocent, that no direct evidence exists against him, and that the lower court's order is illegal. The State opposed the application. The High Court …
The applicant, Sandeep Rajbhar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking relief from a non-bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the District and Sessions Judge, Azamgarh, on 12‑06‑2025 in connection with a trial under the Arms Act (Section 4/25). The …
The applicant, Virendra Kumar, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0551 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, pending trial. The learned counsel highlighted that a co‑accused, Dashrath, had already been released on bail by a coordinate …
The applicant, Hitesh Agrawal, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 855 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 318(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed innocence, stating he was merely an employee of the alleged company and had no criminal history, and …
The applicants, Bhagirath and Braj Bhusan (also known as Bhushan), were charged in Crime No. 52 of 2026 under multiple provisions of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. They applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court examined the facts, the …
The applicant, Soban, filed a bail application in a case registered as Crime No. 364 of 2026 under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the charges were based on police rivalry, that he had no gang affiliation, and that he had …
The applicants, Sachin Kumar and six others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 5359 of 2024) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑3, Moradabad, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 34 of the IPC …
Aamir filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the application, which the State's counsel did not oppose. The court allowed the withdrawal and …
Jitendra Sharma was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged fraud and cheating under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 and 506 of the IPC. He contended that he was falsely implicated, citing a partnership deed with the informant's wife and that a large part of the disputed amount had …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 11‑08‑2026 under sections 333, 352, 115(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The petitioners also made an innocuous prayer that the police follow the arrest …
Vijendra Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside an order dated 24‑07‑2026 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in criminal case 873/2018 (Ganga Saran v. Vijendra Singh). The applicant …
The petitioners, Santosh Kumar and another, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 23 September 2024 passed by the Board of Revenue in Revision No. 501/2009‑2010 (Rajendra Kumar vs. Smt. Meera Devi). They contended that the order was made against the deceased Meera Devi, who had died on 28 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 45358 of 2022) arising from alleged offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that the dispute had been …
The petitioners, married to Syed Haider Ali, filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that the husband, despite a compromise granting him custody of their minor child, was refusing the petitioner access to the child. The husband had earlier sought custody under the Guardians and Wards Act in the …
The applicant, Ritik Singh, was arrested on 21 June 2026 in connection with a case registered as Crime No. 302 of 2026, alleging offences under sections 305(A), 317(2), 318(4) and 3(5). He contended that the recovery of alleged incriminating material from his possession was false, there were no …
Arpit Raj filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings arising from FIR No. 66/2025, which alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 308(2), 319(2), 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66 of the IT Act. The applicant argued that no offence was made …
The petitioners sought quashing of an FIR dated 15 June 2026, registered under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging false implication. The State argued that the FIR disclosed a cognizable offence. The Court examined the FIR and, relying on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 237 of 2014, which involved charges under IPC sections 498, 406 and 506. The State opposed the application and the matter was heard by the Hon'ble Justice …
The petitioners, Bindheshwari and another, landlords in SCC Suit No. 113 of 2003, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Small Causes Court, Kanpur Nagar, to dispose of the suit within a stipulated period due to extensive delays and hardship. They submitted the order sheet …
The petitioner, Durga Prasad Mishra, filed a writ petition seeking expeditious disposal of a civil suit (Case No.4653 of 2022) under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, alleging that the proceedings were delayed due to a prolonged strike by lawyers. The court noted that the strike, while …
The petitioner, Durga Prasad Mishra, filed a writ petition under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, seeking the expeditious disposal of a civil suit (Case No. 4651 of 2022) pending before the trial court. The petition was filed amid a strike by lawyers, which the petitioner argued was …
Petitioner Durga Prasad Mishra filed a writ petition under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, seeking expeditious disposal of a pending civil suit (Case No.4652 of 2022). The High Court, noting a related order in Writ C No.34328 of 2026, disposed of the petition by directing the trial court …
Petitioner Sonara Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking (1) a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 03.08.2026 under Sections 80(2), 85 of the BNS Act read with Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act, and (2) a mandamus directing the State not to arrest her under the same FIR. After hearing, …
Petitioners Omprakash Gond and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 03.08.2026 (Crime No. 279 of 2026) under Sections 80(2), 85 of the BNS Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act, and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest them. After …
The applicant, Jagdish Kumar Yadav, filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court against Shri Anil Bhusan Chaturvedi, Secretary of Basic Shiksha Parishad, U.P. The applicant was represented by counsel Mujib Ahmad Siddiqui and Mustaqeem Ahmad. The matter was listed for hearing …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to accept his option to be placed under the old pension scheme and to decide his representation regarding that option. The petitioner had already submitted a representation which was pending. The State argued that the …
Ashok Kumar Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to set aside a prior order and obtain bail in a case where he is alleged to have committed offences under IPC sections 420, 419, 468, 471 and Section 15(3) of the IMC Act. The High Court …
The petitioners filed Criminal Revision No. 5824 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order. At the admission stage, the petitioner's counsel, Raj Kishor Mishra, informed the court that the petitioners no longer wished to pursue the revision and sought to withdraw it. The State, …
The applicant, Mohammad Faizan, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry. He had already been granted bail in a related gang‑chart case …
The appellant Ram Kumar filed a special appeal against an interlocutory order dated 22 July 2026 issued in Writ-A No.10614 of 2026. The court examined the preliminary objection raised by the respondents and found it to be valid. Consequently, the appeal was held to be not maintainable as it …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Tazuddin, accused in Crime No. 501 of 2025 under Section 69 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, no incriminating material, no prior criminal record, and expressed willingness to marry the victim who was allegedly …
The petitioner Anil Kumar filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 17.08.2026 under Sections 221, 132 and 352 and a direction that he not be arrested. The petitioner’s counsel prayed, as an innocuous request, that the police follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar …
Meera Devi filed a writ petition challenging the securitization proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Allahabad, identified as S.A. No.602 of 2025. She sought a court direction for the DRT to conclude these proceedings expeditiously. The High Court, noting that no further procedural …
The petition was filed in the Allahabad High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution, seeking relief against the State and four other respondents. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal. …
The applicant, Bhagwan Das @ Arjun, filed a bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31516 of 2026, seeking release in case crime No.30 of 2026 involving offences under sections of the BNS Act, the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, and section 66D of the …
The petitioner, a former Pradhan, challenged a District Magistrate's order that imposed a one‑third penalty on him, removed him from administrative duties, and imposed the remaining penalties on other officials following an inquiry into a boundary‑wall construction. The inquiry report exonerated the …
Petitioner Smt. Devki Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to release the post-retirement dues and family pension of her deceased husband, Jeevan Chandra Arya, pursuant to a letter dated 17‑09‑2025 issued by Respondent No.2. The petitioner alleged that despite the …
The petitioners, Amarnath and five others, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (respondent No.2) to decide a revenue case (Computerized Case No. T202616660108772/2026) concerning 1.9050 hectares of land in Musahi village. The petition alleged that the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Vth, Jaunpur to dispose of a civil suit (Original Suit No. 1654 of 1994) that had been pending for about 32 years. The petitioner argued that the suit required early disposal. …
The applicant, Neeraj Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant issued by a Special Judge in a POCSO case. He contended that the warrant was issued without any prior summons or bailable warrant despite being …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Singh, challenged the suspension of his contract issued by the Divisional Food Controller, Azamgarh Division, on 21 August 2026. The District Magistrate/Collector of Gorakhpur issued a revised character certificate on 4 September 2026. The High Court examined whether the …
The accused Mahaveer applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 356 of 2026) involving alleged assault with lathi and danda, filed under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 61(2) and 109(1) of the BNS. He claimed false implication, citing a belated FIR and an old enmity with the victims, and highlighted his …
The applicant, Shivam Saxena, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 136 of 2026) involving multiple IPC offences including sections 191, 109, 333, 115, 352, 351, 117 and 131 BNS. He claimed innocence, asserting that the FIR did not assign him a specific role and that the firearm …
Manoj Kumar applied for bail in a narcotics case (Crime No. 372 of 2026) under Sections 8, 20 and 60 of the NDPS Act, alleging that the seized 6.781 kg of charas was not in his possession and that he was falsely implicated. The applicant's counsel argued his innocence, lack of criminal history, and …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash an order dated 08‑03‑2021 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, in a criminal case initiated under Section 381 of the Bharatiya Dand Sanhita and Sections 65/66 of the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Indal Singh and Shailendra (Sheru) in a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences such as assault, grievous hurt and criminal conspiracy. The applicants alleged that they were falsely implicated in an FIR dated 19 July 2026, which arose from …
The petitioners obtained a temporary injunction in a suit, which the State appealed under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) of the CPC. The State's appeal was delayed, and a condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was granted by the trial court. The petitioners filed a writ petition under …
The applicant, Bhupendra (also known as Rishi), filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 31 of 2026) under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on two earlier cases listed in a gang chart, for …
The applicant, Bhupendra, was charged under Sections 419, 420, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act for alleged cyber‑related offences. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court noted that a co‑accused, Sunil Kumar, had already been …
The petitioner, Smt. Gulafshan Ansari, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking the High Court to direct the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) of Court No.7, Kanpur Nagar to expedite the trial of Criminal Case No.727 of 2025, which involves a claim under Section 12 of …
The applicant, M/s Saini Flowers And Gift Center, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, the Branch Manager of Canara Bank, willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 30.04.2026 in Writ (C) No.15430 of 2026. The Court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed …
The applicant, Azam, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act, fearing arrest after his name appeared in the confessional statement of a co‑accused who was caught with 211 g of heroin. The applicant’s earlier bail …
The High Court considered the bail application of Ziauddin @ Guddu @ Muddi, who was in custody for offences under Sections 308(5) and 61(2) of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged a delayed FIR, and pointed to the grant of anticipatory bail to a co‑accused. The State opposed bail but …
Manoj Kumar, a Sub‑Inspector, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Uttar Pradesh authorities to open the seal‑cover envelope and promote him to Inspector under Government Orders dated 28‑05‑1997 and 09‑01‑2018. The petitioner argued that similarly placed officers had been promoted …
Petitioner Arun Kumar filed a writ petition challenging a prior order. Counsel for the petitioner informed the court that subsequent developments rendered the existing petition unnecessary and sought permission to withdraw it, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition if needed. The court, after …
Petitioner Pardeshi Ram, a retired employee, filed a writ petition seeking payment of his gratuity, commutation of pension and full regular pension from 1 July 2017, alleging that these dues were withheld because a criminal case against him was pending. He had only received interim pension and had …
Petitioner Aysha Khatoon filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to order a CBI investigation under Sections 318(4) and 351(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR dated 10-10-2025. The State, through the learned Additional …
The petitioners, four employees, sought the benefit of the Old Pension Scheme based on a Government Order dated 28‑06‑2024, alleging that their claim was pending before the District Basic Education Officer, Bijnor (respondent No.5). They filed a writ petition requesting the court to direct the …
The petition filed by Ved Prakash, a government servant and father, sought to set aside an order dated 08 July 2026 issued by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Bareilly, which initiated recovery of a maintenance amount of Rs.6,000 per month under Section 144(3) of the Bharatiya …
The petitioner, Jai Prakash, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a mandamus directing the Family Court to allow him to pay alimony of Rs.2,50,000 in easy installments to his wife, Smt. Suman, in a pending divorce case (Petition No. 581 of 2025). He argued that under Section 13B of the …
The petitioners, 28 in‑charge headmasters, filed a writ seeking mandamus directing the District Basic Education Officer, Hathras, to consider their representations and to order payment of their salaries and arrears pursuant to a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026 and a prior judgment in Special …
The petitioner, Kuldeep Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Judge of the Family Court, Firozabad, to expedite the disposal of a pending civil miscellaneous petition concerning guardianship under Section 7 and Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, …
Man Singh filed a writ petition challenging the non‑compliance with an earlier direction dated 26‑August‑2025 in Writ Petition No.29137 of 2025. The petitioner also raised the issue of a cap on loan recovery, seeking guidance on its determination. The court noted that the cap should be considered in …
The applicant, Mahesh Prasad Mishra, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Rakesh Kumar, willfully disobeyed the High Court’s judgment and order dated 16‑10‑2025 in Writ‑A No. 10841 of 2025. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but, instead of issuing …
The applicant, Sudesh Paswan, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in case No. 60338 of 2026, alleging that he was not originally named in the FIR and that the prosecution was malicious. The court examined the FIR, which disclosed a …
The petitioner, Smt Anno Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D) of Jaunpur to decide suit No. 1351/2011 within a stipulated period. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anuj Nath Paswan, accused in a case of alleged assault on a minor (Sonu) under multiple sections of the BNS. The applicant claimed false implication, citing inconsistencies in the FIR, lack of a medical examination on the primary victim, and the …
The petitioner, a retired Assistant Teacher as of 31 March 2025, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the respondents to pay his pension and related retirement benefits, which he claimed were pending despite a prior representation. The respondents argued that the petitioner must file a …
The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party failed to comply with the order dated 18‑02‑2026 (as corrected on 26‑02‑2026) in Writ C No. 6582/2026, which required the opposite party to decide a claim. The court noted that a copy of the order had been served but …
The applicant, Chetan Anand Bharti, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Sri Dr. Chandra Bhushan, willfully disobeyed the High Court's judgment dated 10 December 2025 in Writ‑A No.18610 of 2025. The order required the opposite party to comply with certain directions, which, …
