Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 7001–7200

FAREED @ KALAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Fareed @ Kala, who was alleged to be falsely implicated in a FIR dated 04‑04‑2026 relating to an injury incident on 03‑04‑2026. The applicant argued that he was not named in the original FIR, that the informant’s statement had …

WASEEM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants, Waseem and Asif, were arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 143 of 2026) alleging misuse of an ATM card belonging to the informant's daughter, invoking Sections 303(2) and 318(4) of the Indian Penal Code. They contended that they were falsely implicated, that no incriminating …

KAILASH NATHversusSHAILESH KUMAR PANDEY SETTLEMENT OFFICER OF CONSOLIDATION

Kailash Nath filed a contempt application against Shailesh Kumar Pandey, the Settlement Officer, alleging willful defiance of an order dated 22 April 2026 issued in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 1720 of 2025. The High Court noted that a certified copy of the writ order had been served but remained …

YOGENDRA KUMAR MAHURE AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, eleven In‑charge Headmasters, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to pay their salaries and arrears of salary as per a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. They claimed that despite multiple representations to the competent authority, no …

SURESHversusSANJAY SHARMA AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Suresh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 3, Mathura, to decide an application filed on 06.03.2024 under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which was registered as Misc. Case No. 155 of 2024 in Suit …

SRIKANT TRIPATHI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Board of Revenue, Allahabad to decide a second appeal (No. 1222 of 2015) that had been pending for eleven years. The petition alleged that the delay violated their right to timely justice. The State did not oppose the prayer. The …

HARIKESH AND 2 OTHERSversusSHIV CHAND

The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge, Mau, to decide an old civil suit (Case No. 776 of 2016/167 of 2024) within a stipulated period. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh, which …

PRITI DEVI @ PRITI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Priti Devi and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The standing counsel for the State informed the Court that an FIR had already been lodged in Crime No. 218 of 2026 under Sections 87 and 137(2) of the B.N.S. at Amaria Police Station, Pilibhit. The petitioners …

AMIT KUMAR ALIAS PARESHWARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Amit Kumar filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order passed by the Family Court, Ghaziabad, which directed him to pay Rs 5,000 per month to his wife and Rs 2,500 to his minor son from 21‑06‑2024. He sought a stay of the arrears and asked the High Court to direct the Family …

JAI PRAKASH DUBEYversusSMT. INDRAWATI DUBEY AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking an expeditious decision of a pending Civil Appeal No.35 of 2026 (Old Case No.394 of 2023). The High Court observed that keeping the matter pending served no useful purpose and therefore disposed of the writ petition at the admission …

AMRITA TIWARIversusVIVEK KUMAR TIWARI

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Chandauli, to decide a pending divorce petition (No. 437 of 2024) expeditiously under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had been …

SMT. VIMLA DEVIversusINDRA BAHADUR AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Vimla Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 11, Prayagraj, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (Form 6‑C) in Civil Suit No. 1519 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the …

SHIVAM SINGH RATHOREversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Shivam Singh Rathore filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 06‑02‑2026 registered under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 125 and 127(2) of the B.N.S. and to obtain a direction that he not be arrested. He also prayed that the police, before making any arrest, follow the Supreme …

JAGDEESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Jagdeesh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking relief. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel requested that the application be withdrawn. The High Court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal. The court dismissed the Section 528 …

MOHD DILSHAD HUSSAIN AND 2 OTHERSversusSRI SURENDRA PRATAP SINGH

The applicants, sons of the original writ petitioner, sought contempt relief alleging that the opposite party’s notice to remove encroachments on Gata No. 383 violated a stay order protecting their possession of Plot No. 382. The stay order dated 16‑04‑2025 restrained respondents from dispossessing …

BAIJNATH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

Baijnath Yadav was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 105, 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to have caused the death of an informant's father by pushing him. The post‑mortem report showed no ante‑mortem injuries and the cause of death could not be ascertained, leading …

NASIRULLAHversusHIMANSHU VERMA

The applicant, Nasirullah, filed a contempt petition alleging that the opposite party failed to comply with a High Court order dated 30 July 2024, which dismissed a revision against an interlocutory order in proceedings under Section 128 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The original order …

NAVED MALIKversusSTATE OF U.P.

Naved Malik, charged under several IPC provisions and Section 66D of the IT Act, applied for enlargement of bail after his first bail plea was rejected on 22‑04‑2026. He argued that a co‑accused, Raghav Rohila, was later granted bail on similar charges, and therefore he should be released on the …

SARVAR ALIversusNARENDRA SINGH TAHSILDAR CAMPAIERGANJ

Sarvar Ali filed a contempt application against Narendra Singh, a Tahsildar, alleging that the order dated 25 September 2024 in PIL No. 1903 of 2024 directing the opposite party to decide a claim had not been complied with. The court noted that a prima facie case of willful disobedience existed but …

NIRNIMESH SINGHversusPRAGYA SINGH AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Nirnimesh Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Gautam Budh Nagar, to expedite the disposal of his pending divorce petition (Case No. 840 of 2024) within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that the …

ARVIND KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Arvind Kumar Gupta filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21358 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating the petitioner would pursue any other appropriate remedy. The State, represented by the …

SANJAY SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sanjay Singh Yadav, filed a writ petition challenging the Appellate Authority's refusal to grant interim relief under the Nagar Niyojan Adhiniyam, 1973 in a demolition matter. The petitioner changed his counsel on the hearing date, leading the court to question the bonafide nature of …

ANKIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ankit Kumar was charged in Crime No. 380 of 2026 under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 339) and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The applicant contended that there was no cogent evidence linking him to the alleged online gaming offence and …

RAHIS KHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Rahis Khan and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners prayed for leave to withdraw the petition and to seek any other appropriate remedy. The State and other respondents, represented by the learned …

JITENDRA KUMAR KANAUJIAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar Kanaujia, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a writ of mandamus to compel Judicial Magistrate IV, Prayagraj to decide Criminal Case No. 2576 of 2024 (under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act) against Daud Khan. The petitioner, who is the complainant, …

SHAMU LAL CHAKRAWAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Shamu Lal Chakrawal and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 19‑12‑2025 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 59715 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of …

ATUL ANANDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Atul Anand, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.0013 of 2026) under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on a single case already listed in a gang chart for which …

JITENDRA BRIJA SAHANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a prosecution order dated 25-10-2024 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bulandshahr. The court examined the allegations, which involved offences under Section 420 of the IPC and Section 66D of the IT Act, and …

DHIRENDRA YADAVversusMR GAURANG RATHI

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 19-11-2025 in Writ-C No.22417 of 2025. The court noted that a prima facie case existed for contempt but, instead of issuing notice, it granted the opposite party an additional …

RAJDEEPversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rajdeep, was charged in Crime No.138 of 2026 under Sections 308(2), 318(4) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66D of the Income Tax Act. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial, asserting no prior criminal record. The Court noted that a co‑accused, Suraj Kumar, had …

KAUSHAL KATIYARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

Petitioner Kaushal Katiyar filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 24.01.2026 under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 352 and 351(3) B.N.S., and a direction restraining his arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge‑sheet had already …

SANJAY YADAVversusSAURABH TYAGI AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Sanjay Yadav filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.), Hapur to decide Original Suit No.172 of 2025 within a stipulated period without unnecessary adjournments. The High Court examined whether it could issue such a time‑bound directive to a subordinate court. It …

BABURAMversusSRI HIMANSHU AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Baburam, filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant later sought to withdraw the application, citing an inherent defect in the pleading. The applicant also requested liberty to file a fresh contempt application if necessary. The Court …

PALAK MAITIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Khitin Maiti, filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that his daughter Palak Maiti, aged 18, was being held involuntarily by private respondent Sagar Kumar. The State contended that Palak had attained majority, voluntarily married Sagar Kumar, and had given a handwritten statement …

RAM ASHRAY PATELversusAMARNATH

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division)/Fast Track Court, Varanasi, to decide a Section 6-C application pending in Suit No.209 of 2022. The High Court, finding no useful purpose in keeping the petition pending, disposed of it at …

MAHESH SINGH @ MAHESH SINGH YADAVversusSHRI MANOJ KUMAR DWIVEDI

The applicant Mahesh Singh filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of a 19 April 2007 order in a writ petition concerning his ad‑hoc appointment as a teacher and the illegal appointment of the headmaster's sons. The respondent institution contested the authenticity of appointment …

TANU TYAGI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital cohabitation and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority, affidavits confirming voluntary …

PAWAN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Pawan Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to set aside a prosecution order dated 23.01.2025 and to obtain bail, alleging that he had not yet been arrested and that the police were attempting to arrest him. The court examined the allegations, noting they pertained to …

DEVESH KUMAR AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Devesh Kumar and five others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 16‑09‑2020 and the ensuing criminal proceedings (Case No. 9990 of 2021) relating to offences under IPC sections 498‑A, 323 and Dowry Prohibition Act …

JANNATI (DETENUE) AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Jannati's father filed a habeas corpus petition alleging illegal detention of the minor daughter by private respondents. After filing, the minor was returned to her mother, Rani, restoring her custody. The petitioner's counsel then informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue …

SHREECHAND YADAVversusMR. RAJESH ARYA

Shreechand Yadav filed a contempt application alleging that Rajesh Arya failed to comply with an order dated 18 May 2026 issued in Writ A No. 8397/2025, which required the opposite party to decide a claim. The court noted that a prima facie case of willful disobedience existed but declined to issue …

GAUTAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Gautam applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 155 of 2024) involving charges under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 325 and 308, arising from an alleged assault on his uncle/nephew that resulted in two injuries, one a skull fracture, and the subsequent death of the injured party. The applicant …

RAM ASHISHversusANKUR VERMA SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

The High Court of Allahabad entertained a contempt application filed by Ram Ashish against Sub‑Divisional Magistrate Ankur Verma for allegedly failing to comply with the order dated 08‑06‑2026 in PIL No. 1481 of 2026, which directed the opposite party to decide a claim. The applicant asserted that a …

SMT SADHANA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt Sadhana and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority and …

RAM KHELAWAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ram Khelawan and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 23‑06‑2026 and a direction that they not be arrested. They requested the police to follow the Supreme Court's guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar regarding arrests. The …

SAMALIYAversusMANISH BANSAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE / COLLECTOR AGRA

The applicant, Samaliya, filed a contempt application against the District Magistrate/Collector, Manish Bansal, alleging willful defiance of a High Court order dated 29‑04‑2026 in Writ‑A No. 6147 of 2026. The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy of the order, the opposite party …

SHYAM SINGH YADAV URF SHYAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of criminal proceedings initiated under Sections 272, 273, 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 59 of the Food Safety and Standards Act. The applicant argued that no offence was made out and the prosecution was …

M/S MAHESH EDIBLE OIL INDUSTRIES LTDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Mahesh Edible Oil Industries Ltd purchased mustard seeds from outside Uttar Pradesh and used them to produce mustard oil at its Agra plant. The Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti issued a notice under the U.P. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 and the 1965 Rules requiring the petitioner to …

ROHIT DHANKEDversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Rohit Dhanked filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 30‑09‑2025 passed by Respondent No.4. The petition alleged that the order was illegal and asked the High Court to set it aside. The State of Uttar Pradesh, as respondent, raised a preliminary objection …

DEVATA NAND SINGHversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, a former Indian Army serviceman now employed with the Uttar Pradesh Police Development Department, filed a writ petition seeking three orders of mandamus: (i) to have his earlier army service counted towards his present police service, (ii) to have his salary fixed as if he had been …

HARI PRAKASH SHUKLA AND 5 OTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a criminal complaint (Case No. 801 of 2026) and a summoning order issued by the Additional Civil Judge in Jaunpur. They did not press the merits of the quash request and instead asked the High Court to direct the …

AKIL RANAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Akil Rana, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act seeking to quash the criminal proceeding (Complaint case no. 115 of 2026) filed against him and three others. The application also requested that the lower courts decide his bail application …

NISRAT KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Nisbat Khan in a session case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 304‑B of the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that three fact witnesses, whose statements were recorded under Section 319 Cr.P.C., had …

DEVASHISH NIGAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Devashish Nigam, applied for bail in a case under sections 115(2), 352, 109(1) and 117(2) of the BNS, alleging he assaulted a 38‑year‑old woman with a brick. The FIR was lodged by the victim's brother, but the medical report showed only minor injuries and the victim’s statement was …

BHUTTU @ INSAFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Bhuttu @ Insaf (revisionist) challenged an ex parte maintenance order dated 18‑09‑2018 passed under Section 125 CrPC, which had already been recalled on 18‑01‑2020 by a Section 126(2) application. He later filed another Section 126(2) application, dismissed on 08‑09‑2025, and now filed a criminal …

SHAILEDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Shailedra Kumar challenged a notice dated 14‑08‑2026 issued by the Varanasi Municipal Corporation ordering demolition or sealing of his residential premises at Arazi No. 96, Mauza Hukulganj. He sought a writ of certiorari to quash the notice and a writ of mandamus to restrain any …

AJAY VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ajay Verma, filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 14‑08‑2026 issued by the Varanasi Municipal Corporation ordering demolition or sealing of his residential premises at Arazi No. 96, Mauza Hukulganj. He sought a certiorari to quash the notice and a mandamus directing the …

RAJ KUMAR VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Raj Kumar Verma challenged a notice dated 14‑08‑2026 issued by the Varanasi Municipal Corporation ordering demolition or sealing of his residential premises. He sought a writ of certiorari to quash the notice and a mandamus directing the respondents not to dispossess him without authority …

SHADABversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained a second anticipatory bail application filed by Shadab under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a matter arising under Sections 3 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant contended that he was not named in the FIR and was only …

CHOTIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a murder case where she was alleged to have thrown brickbats causing fatal head injuries to the deceased. The FIR named six accused, but two were dropped; the applicant contended she was merely present and had no prior criminal …

JAGJIWANversusVISHAL JAISWAL AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Jagjiwan, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mau, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C2) filed in Suit No. 198 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had been pending without …

LAL CHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Lal Chandra challenged the alteration of his date of birth in his service record from 01‑09‑1967 to 01‑04‑1964, alleging violation of Uttar Pradesh Recruitment to Services (Determination of Date of Birth) Rules, 1974 and Fundamental Rule 56, and that he was denied a hearing. The …

SMT KAJAL SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt Kajal Singh and another filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The Court was informed that an FIR had already been lodged in the matter. The petitioners' counsel could not dispute this information. The Court held that the filing of the FIR rendered …

MITHUN @ BHARAT AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of FIR No. 0245 of 2026 (sections 191(2), 115(2), 352 of the B.N.S.) and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The petitioners later made an innocuous prayer that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines …

FIRERAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Fireram, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Sanyukta Sangathan) of Bulandshahar to consider and decide his land acquisition application dated 17 July 2012 within the time prescribed by law. The respondents contended that the …

KESHAV RAJPUT AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Keshav Rajput and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 15‑08‑2026 and a direction that they not be arrested. They prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273 before …

DILIP KUMAR PATELversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Dilip Kumar Patel, was charged under Sections 318(2), 61(2) of the BNS and Sections 8, 10, 11, 13(3), 13(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, in Crime No. 362 of 2026. He applied for bail while the trial was pending. The Court noted that a …

AKHIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Akhil Kumar, an In‑charge Headmaster, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 09‑07‑2025 issued by the District Basic Education Officer, Siddharth Nagar, seeking salary and arrears of salary as per a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. He prayed for a certiorari to quash the …

ZAID AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Zaid Ahmad, an In‑charge Headmaster, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 09‑07‑2025 issued by the District Basic Education Officer of Siddharth Nagar, seeking salary and arrears as per a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. He prayed for a certiorari to quash the impugned …

JOGI SAHANI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants, the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, were charged under Sections 85 and 80(2) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They contended that there was no material to show they harassed the deceased or that the presumption of dowry …

SHAHNAWAZversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Shahnawaz, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on five other criminal cases in which he had already been granted bail and that …

SUHAILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Suhail, filed a bail application in a NDPS case (Crime No.190 of 2026) alleging that 1050 grams of charas was falsely recovered and that no chemical analyst report exists to confirm the substance. He contended that the allegations are fabricated to harass him and that he has been in …

DANISHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Danish, was charged in Crime No.541 of 2026 under Section 109(1) of the BNS, Sections 3, 5Ka and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, Section 11 of the Animals Cruelty Act and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail while the trial was pending. The court examined the …

ANURAG TOMARversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anurag Tomar, who was arrested in a POCSO case (Crime No.167 of 2026) alleging aggravated sexual assault. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, highlighted a 25‑day delay in filing the FIR, and noted that both alleged victims …

AJIT KUAR SHAHI AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, ten teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters in Gorakhpur, sought a writ of certiorari to quash a Government order and mandamus directing the District Basic Education Officer to release their salaries and arrears and to decide pending representations. They relied on a Government …

PRINCE YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

Prince Yadav applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 3(1) and 2(b)(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he had been falsely implicated due to police rivalry and that he was already on bail in a related gang‑chart case. He had been in …

NARENDRA @ SONUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Narendra (Sonu), the husband of a woman who allegedly committed suicide within seven years of marriage. The applicant claimed false implication and argued there was no evidence of dowry-related cruelty, seeking release on bail under …

AJAYversusSTATE OF U.P.

Petitioner Ajay, who had been granted bail in six criminal cases, sought relief from the High Court to avoid furnishing separate sureties for each case, requesting that a single common surety be accepted. He relied on a Supreme Court judgment in Hani Nishad v. State of UP (SLA No. 8915 of 2018) …

HASAN ASIFversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Hasan Asif, who was in custody since 9 June 2026 for offences alleged under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) and 112 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, asserting that the forged mark‑sheet …

MITTHOO PRASADversusSMT MANJU DEVI AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mitthoo Prasad, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Siddharth Nagar to decide an interim injunction application filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of the CPC in Miscellaneous Civil Suit No. 17 of 2025. The High Court …

RAJ KUMAR @ RAJUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Raj Kumar @ Raju, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to set aside the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑5, Bareilly dated 22‑04‑2026, and to quash the criminal proceedings against him. The High Court examined the allegations, noting that …

SMT NEHA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school mark sheets to prove majority, affidavits confirming free …

RAMKUMAR @ BADEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ramkumar @ Bade, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a non-bailable warrant (NBW) dated 17-06-2022 issued by the Civil Judge (J.D.) of Jalaun in a case arising from an Arms Act charge (Section 3/25). The applicant argued that the NBW was issued …

ABHISHEK SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhishek Srivastava, who is accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 430 of 2025) under Sections 406, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the matter stemmed from a business dispute and that he would not …

RISHI SHARMA @ RINKUversusSTATE OF U.P.

Rishi Sharma was charged under Sections 317(2) and 318(4) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act in Crime No. 254 of 2026. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court noted that a co‑accused, Durgesh Kumar, had already been released on bail in a …

RAIS AHMAD AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Rais Ahmad and another, filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 22‑08‑2026 and a direction that they not be arrested. They argued that the police should follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar regarding arrest procedures. The State …

SAMEEM FATMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioner Sameem Fatma filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that her brother Asif Iqbal was illegally detained by private respondents Nos. 6 to 8 from 15.08.2026 to 30.08.2026. The petitioner later stated that Asif Iqbal has been returned to her and she no longer wishes to pursue the petition. …

MANVEERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Manveer filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Chief Executive Officer of the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) to consider and decide his application dated 25 August 2026 within the time prescribed by law. The respondents argued that the application could be decided …

PAPPU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Pappu Yadav, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.166 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act. The court considered the facts, the submissions of counsel, and noted that a co‑accused, Basant Lal Yadav, had already been granted bail in a similar case. The applicant's …

SUNIL KUMAR SONKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Class IV employees of the State Warehousing Corporation, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the corporation to grant them annual increments and benefits under the 7th Pay Commission along with arrears. They also requested the court to order the corporation to decide …

KESHU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered bail application No. 31475 of 2026 filed by Keshu Yadav, who was arrested in Crime No. 273 of 2026 under Sections 3, 5 and 25(8) of the Arms Act and Section 61(2) of the BNS. The applicant pleaded that he was falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record and …

HIMWANT SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Himwant Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition contained certain discrepancies, rendering it procedurally defective. The petitioner’s counsel, Ramendra Asthana, acknowledged the defect and suggested that the petition could be dismissed, allowing …

MAHI PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Mahi Pal alleged that his fair price shop licence was suspended on 27‑12‑2005 and possibly later cancelled, but he does not possess the suspension or cancellation orders. An FIR was lodged against him under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, and he was acquitted by a …

WAQAR AHMADversusDISTRICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, a former Assistant Teacher who took voluntary retirement, applied for gratuity on 23‑01‑2023 and later sought interest on the delayed payment. Earlier writ petitions resulted in the court directing payment of gratuity with interest, and a Division Bench affirmed the application date …

ARUN TUNDA ALIAS RAJENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Arun Tunda filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 26.07.2026 under Sections 276, 277, 318 and 319 of the B.N.S.S. and a direction that he not be arrested. The petitioner also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar …

SMT. ALIA PARVEENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Smt. Alia Parveen filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Shamli, to expedite the disposal of Case No. 573 of 2025, which is pending under Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The …

ARUN DAGAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Arun Dagar and three others filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 05.08.2026 under Section 351(3) of the B.N.S.S. and a direction that they not be arrested. The petitioners prayed that any arrest should follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State …

BRIJESH KUMARversusSTATE OF UP

The High Court considered the bail application of Brijesh Kumar, who is implicated in a criminal case under Sections 3(5), 61(2), 309(6) and 317(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the recovery alleged by the prosecution was fabricated …

ADWAIT NARAYAN SINGHversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Adwait Narayan Singh, appealed against the charge‑sheet and summoning order in a case involving alleged offences under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. He contended that the dispute with his wife was purely matrimonial and …

RISHABH SHNAKAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Rishabh Shankar Shukla appealed against a summoning order issued by the Special Judge, SC/ST (PA) Act, Etawah, which had summoned him under several IPC offences and provisions of the SC/ST Act. The appellant argued that the investigating officer’s final report found insufficient evidence, that the …

ROHIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rohit Kumar under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR No. 195 of 2026 alleging false promise of marriage and related offences under the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely …

SHALUversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Shalu filed a writ petition challenging two orders dated 17‑08‑2026 and 18‑02‑2026 that were passed under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The petitioner argued that the orders were illegal and sought relief from …

INDIA SHELTER FINANCE CORPORATION LTDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, India Shelter Finance Corporation Ltd., sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to ensure physical possession of a mortgaged property after an order under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act was passed by the Additional District Magistrate. The petition argued that the …

AMARJEET KUMAR MANOJversusSTATE OF UP

The applicant, a Branch Manager of UP Gramin Bank, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case alleging misappropriation of funds from 51 bank accounts, with charges under Sections 420, 120B and 409 of the IPC. He contended that the co‑accused siphoned the …

RANJEET KUMAR CHANDversusSURENDRA KUMAR CHAND

The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar Chand, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bansgaon, to decide a 7‑C application filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 of the CPC in Suit No. 974 of 2021. The High Court, after noting that …

BHOJRAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Bhojraj, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC fearing arrest in a FIR alleging firing on an informant, a case with no injury. The applicant argued he was falsely implicated, had no prior conviction, and only one pending case. The informant’s counsel …

SHREYJAL @ SUJALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shreyjal @ Sujal, was arrested in Criminal Case No. 219 of 2025 under IPC sections 310(2) and 317(3), 317(4). He contended that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR, and that the alleged recovery of contraband from his possession lacked an independent witness. Although …

AVADH BIHARI @ BANDHUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Avadh Bihari, father‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, was charged under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the Evidence Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that there was no material showing cruelty or dowry demand before the …

SHREYJAL @ SUJALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shreyjal @ Sujal, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 329 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 310(2) and 317(3), 317(4) of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the alleged recovery of contraband …

SURENDRAversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Surendra, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition, seeking to pursue other legal remedies. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, raised …

SUNIL KUMAR YADAVversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Sunil Kumar Yadav filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. to promote him to Deputy Commissioner, Handloom and Textiles (effective 17‑05‑2018) and to Joint Commissioner, Industries (Handloom) (effective 11‑08‑2025), alleging that a junior colleague had been …

PAPPU YADAV URF VEERBAHADUR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Pappu Yadav and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 19‑03‑2026 under IPC sections 191(2), 115(2) and 324(4) and a direction that they not be arrested. They prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar …

AJAY YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ajay Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Additional Session Judge in a 2006 trial relating to offences under Sections 302/34 and 201/34 of the IPC. The applicant …

SMT. NEHA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a married couple, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They established that both are adults by submitting a high school mark sheet and …

HEMLATA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals living together in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court …

RINKU @ RAHULversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Rinku @ Rahul was arrested in connection with an FIR dated 21.07.2026 alleging enticement of a 17‑year‑old girl, a charge filed by the victim's father. The victim’s statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code were found to be inconsistent, and the …

BANIYA URF VINODversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Baniya Urf Vinod in a POCSO case (Crime No. 193 of 2026) under sections 5m and 6. The FIR was lodged seven days after the alleged incident and there was no medical evidence, although the victim gave a statement against the applicant. …

SMT. PRIYA YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, adult husband and wife, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets and a marriage registration certificate …

MOHD ANSAR AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohd Ansar Ahmad, filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 26-11-2025 under Section 318(4) of the B.N.S.S. and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2008, and also requested that the police not arrest him. The petitioner’s counsel prayed that, if arrest were …

YOGESHWAR JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Yogeshwar Jaiswal in a case under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 111(2)(b) of the IPC and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, which was lodged five days after the alleged incident, and that the recovery of …

BADRI PRASAD @ RINKU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Badri Prasad and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order dated 21‑02‑2026 in a case where they were charged under sections 318(4), 316(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) BNS. The contention was that sections 318(4) and …

RISHIPAL @ SHRIPALversusSTATE OF UP

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rishipal, the father‑in‑law of a woman who allegedly committed suicide, under Sections 80(2), 85 and 115(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that there was no …

GHURE LALversusSMT. SUSHILA DEVI AND 3 OTHERS

Ghure Lal filed a defendant's petition under Article 227 seeking a decision on a Section 6‑C application for a temporary injunction that had been granted ad interim by the trial court in Suit No. 355 of 2021. The petitioner also wanted the High Court to consider the objections he had filed on …

DEEPEE UPASANA @ JANIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Deepee Upasana @ Jani was arrested in connection with case crime No. 0164 of 2026, alleged to have committed offences under IPC sections 308(5), 318(4), 351(3) and 317(2) and a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the allegations …

AMIT @ AMIT SIKARWAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Amit Sikarwar and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking bail after an FIR dated 11‑08‑2023 alleged offences under IPC sections 332, 353, 504 and 506 and the Public Property Damage Prevention Act. The Judicial …

VISHAL SINGHversusSRI HITESH AGRAWAL

The High Court considered a contempt application filed by Vishal Singh alleging that Sri Hitesh Agrawal had willfully defied an order dated 12 April 2024 issued in an Article 227 proceeding. The 2024 order directed the trial court to publish a notice in a scheduled newspaper and to proceed with the …

BHIMversusRAM AASHISH AND 5 OTHERS

Bhim filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Deoria to decide a Section 6‑C application filed in Suit No. 24 of 2026. The High Court, noting that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petition pending, disposed of it at the …

MOHD. MUSTKEEMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohd. Mustkeem, challenged his dismissal from service by a disciplinary authority, a decision that was affirmed by an appellate authority. He filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The respondents raised a preliminary objection, contending that the …

SANDHYA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Sandhya and another filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 35507 of 2026) before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The petition was presented by counsel Sarfaraz Ahmad and Shri Ram Mishra. The respondents, the State of U.P. and three others, were represented by C.S.C. The learned …

SHRUTI SHARMAversusPRADEEP SHARMA @ PANKAJ

The petitioner, Shruti Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Ghaziabad, to decide her pending divorce petition (No.277 of 2026) within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition was pending and …

RAMESHWAR PANDEYversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rameshwar Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondents No.2 and No.3 to order respondent No.4 to submit documentary evidence filed on 28‑10‑2025 and to comply with an order dated 28‑11‑2025. The petitioner also prayed to approach the …

NASEEMversusSTATE OF UP

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Naseem, who was charged under Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955. The applicant was not named in the FIR; his name appeared only in a confessional statement of a …

SMT ATIKSHA TRIPATHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, who are adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital cohabitation and to provide them protection. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority, affidavits confirming free consent, and alleged threats from family …

SOHIL KHANversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Sohil Khan, sought bail in a criminal case involving charges under sections of the IPC, the POCSO Act and the IT Act. He claimed innocence, stating that no indecent photographs were recovered and that the allegations were false. The State opposed bail but could not refute the …

VINESHversusREGIONAL MANAGER RAJYA BHANDARAN AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Vinesh, filed a writ petition alleging that his request for regularisation of service with the U.P. State Warehousing Corporation had not been decided. The respondents argued that the matter required factual determination by the competent authority and that the petitioner's …

SABIRversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Sabir filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 11‑07‑2026 under Sections 74, 352 and 351(3) of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. Act and a direction that he not be arrested. The petitioner’s counsel requested that, before any arrest, the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid …

JASVEER SINGH @ GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jasveer Singh @ Gupta, who was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged offences. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged after an inordinate delay of over three and a half months and that there was no …

DUSHYANT SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusDINESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Aligarh, to decide an interim injunction application filed in Original Suit No. 723 of 2024. The High Court observed that keeping the matter pending would serve no useful purpose and …

UJJWAL KUMAR JAISAWALversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Ujjwal Kumar Jaisawal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 27‑07‑2026 (Crime No. 0228/2026) under sections 331(3) and 305 of the BNS, 2023, and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest him. The State, through the learned Additional …

SHANI KUMAR @ RAVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shani Kumar @ Ravi was arrested in Basti district for possession of 10 kg of ganja, alleged under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The applicant sought bail during the pendency of trial. The court noted that the seized quantity was below the statutory …

JITENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Jitendra Singh filed a bail cancellation application (No. 330 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court, seeking to cancel his interim bail. Counsel for the applicant argued that the application had become infructuous because the bail had already been granted finally. The court examined …

ARUN KUMAR SAINIversusSANTOSH KUMAR

Arun Kumar Saini filed a contempt application against Santosh Kumar for allegedly refusing to comply with the judgment and order dated 14‑11‑2025 in Writ A No. 16979 of 2025. The applicant claimed that a certified copy of the order had been served but the opposite party had not acted on it. The …

GAYATRI YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 24-12-2025 and the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.420 of 2025 pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Prayagraj. They also requested that the lower courts be …

YOGENDRA @ YOGENDRA VARSHNEY AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash the summoning order dated 06‑06‑2024 and the entire proceedings of a criminal complaint pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasganj. They alleged false implication and argued that the summons were issued without …

AJAY KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 26455 of 2022) arising from alleged offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 506 and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that they had reached an amicable …

SMT. PRIYANKA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, an adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted Aadhaar cards to prove majority and affidavits confirming that their …

VIKAS KUMAR SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking verification of a written compromise dated 27‑08‑2026. The court noted that the parties had already entered into the compromise and that two of the parties, one a cadet in the Merchant Navy and the other …

JASVEER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jasveer Singh in a case under IPC sections 352, 351(3), 318(4), 319(2) and CrPC sections 61(2)(a) and 111(4). The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged after a delay of more than five months, that there was no corroborative evidence linking …

GOURAV AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants (Gourav and six others) filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 34119 of 2026, alleging that they had reached a compromise with opposite party No.2 and settled the dispute …

SAURABH KATIYARversusPRIYA KATIYAR AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Saurabh Katiyar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Family Court, Kanpur Dehat, to decide his divorce petition (Case No. 316 of 2025) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, within a short period as per Section 21B. The petitioner argued that …

PRASHANT TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Prashant Tiwari, filed a bail application under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, seeking release while his trial is pending. He contended that the charges were based on police rivalry, that he had no gang affiliation, and that he had …

VIKRAM VIBHUTI SINGH MOURYA AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, a group of ten accused, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of the charge‑sheet dated 11‑12‑2024 and a stay of the Special Judge’s proceedings in Special Session Trial No. 918 of 2026. They also prayed that the trial court expedite …

MANSHARAM AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the pending criminal complaint (Case No. 2388 of 2025) and a summons issued by the Judicial Magistrate Court, Mainpuri, which charged them under sections 115(2), 351(3) and 74 of the BNS. The applicants did not press …

RICHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Richa, filed a transfer application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, seeking to move a criminal complaint from Sambhal to Moradabad on the ground of personal threat. The applicant argued that justice would be served if she could appear via …

DR. MOHD. UMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Dr. Mohd. Umar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 13‑08‑2026 issued in Complaint Case No. 2035 of 2025 (Nazarul v. Dr. Mohd. Umar) under Section 304 IPC. The warrant was issued by the Chief Judicial …

SIMRAN SINGHALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Simran Singhal filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash a summoning order dated 25‑01‑2024 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑III, Gautam Budh Nagar, and the pending criminal case (Complaint No.1964 of 2023) under Section 406 IPC. The applicant alleged …

DIVYANSHU GAUTAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet and the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 32543 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 85, 115(2) and 352 IPC. The applicants claimed that they had reached an amicable compromise with the …

RAM PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ram Prakash filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 7910 of 2026) arising from Crime No. 52 of 2025 pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, and also requested liberty to surrender and obtain …

EHASAN @ SABUR ALI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceeding (Criminal Case No.23112 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 85, 351(3) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry …

KESHAR PRATAP PATELversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Keshar Pratap Patel, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, his counsel sought to withdraw the application and requested that it be dismissed, with liberty to file a revision if needed. The Court entertained …

MOHD. AHSAN AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Mohd Ahsan and seven others filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 17‑08‑2026 and a direction that they not be arrested. They prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar before making any arrest. The State opposed the merits …

KHUSHABOOversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Khushaboo, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No. 3 to act on his representation dated 18‑08‑2026 concerning a merit list based on his qualifications and income certificate. The petitioner alleged that the representation remained pending. The State’s …

SMT. SUNIDHI RANI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and others not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority, affidavits confirming free consent to marriage, …

SMT ALISHA GUPTA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt Alisha Gupta and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petition was challenged by the Standing Counsel for the respondents, who submitted that an FIR had already been lodged in Crime No. 79 of 2026 under …

SANDEEP KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 12‑03‑2025 and a cognizance order dated 19‑02‑2026 in Case No. 654 2026. They contended that the offences alleged – Sections 351(2), 352 and 115(2) of the BNSS – are non‑cognizable and that, under …

VINOD KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order in a criminal complaint (Case No. 304 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 392, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court …

TARIQUE JAMALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Tarique Jamam, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 16480 of 2026) arising from alleged offences under IPC sections 498‑A and 308. The applicant claimed that he and the second opposite party had reached an amicable …

RIZWAN MIYANversusSTATE OF UP AND 19 OTHERS

The appellant, a 1/36th co‑sharer of Gata Nos. 363 and 366 in Bareilly, appealed the trial court's dismissal of his application for a temporary injunction to restrain co‑sharers from interfering with his alleged possession of a shop and flat. He produced the record of rights (Khatauni) showing his …

SMT. MANISHA SHANKHWARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Manisha Shankhwar filed a criminal revision challenging the Family Court's order that denied her claim for maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code while granting a modest maintenance to her minor son. She alleged that she was forced out of her matrimonial home due to dowry …

RISHI KUMAR BUDHAURIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Rishi Kumar Budhauriya filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 12.08.2026 and a mandamus to restrain his arrest. After arguments, the petitioner’s counsel requested leave to withdraw the petition, offering to pursue other remedies. The …

SHAILJA PANDEYversusVIKAS CHANDRA PANDEY

The petitioner, Shailja Pandey, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court‑3, Gorakhpur, to decide her pending divorce case (Case No.689 of 2023) within a fixed time‑bound period. The petitioner argued that the divorce …

RAMESH KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ramesh Kumar and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to compute their defence service, include it with present service, and fix their pensionary benefits as per Civil Service Regulation 526. They alleged that multiple representations to the …

SMT. RUCHI PATEL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a married couple who are both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide them protection. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority, affidavits confirming free consent, and alleged …

CHAMELI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Chameli Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide after a domestic dispute, was charged under sections 85, 80(2), 115(2) of the B.N.S. and sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She contended that she was falsely implicated, that there was no material to support a presumption of …

RAVIKANT AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, who had obtained a decree in a civil suit over a land dispute, were assaulted by the respondent after the respondent's appeal was allowed. The petitioners filed an FIR on 27 March 2023 and the respondent later lodged a criminal complaint under IPC sections 324, 504 and 506. The …

UPENDRA SINGH KUSHWAHAversusKAJAL SINGH

The petitioner, Upendra Singh Kushwaha, married Kajal Singh on 12‑12‑2016 and filed a mutual divorce petition under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act before the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Ghazipur, on 03‑09‑2025. The divorce case remained pending, prompting the petitioner to file a …

M/S SALH INDUSTRIESversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

Salh Industries challenged an adjudication order dated 5 December 2025 issued under Section 74 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017. The company's GST registration had been cancelled on 21 May 2021, but a show‑cause notice was served only through the Common Portal on 28 June 2025, more than four years …

PUSHPENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pushpendra, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 158 of 2026 under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that he had been falsely implicated due to …

SAIYYAD MOHAMMAD JILANIversusSAIYYAD MUHAMMAD JIYAUDDIN

The petitioner, Saiyyad Mohammad Jilani, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division)/A.C.J.M., Court No.17, Allahabad to decide a 6‑C application filed in Case No.150 of 2023. The High Court examined the petition and, finding …

ANKUR AGRAWALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ankur Agrawal in a case involving alleged misappropriation of gold ornaments from a bank safe. The applicant was not named in the FIR; his name surfaced later based on a co‑accused's confessional statement. The court noted that there …

ROHIT YADAV @ LAVISHversusSMT. NEHA YADAV

The petitioner, Rohit Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Saharanpur, to decide his matrimonial case (No. 796 of 2024) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that …

SUBHASH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners Subhash and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petition sought relief, but counsel for the petitioners requested that the petition be dismissed with liberty to approach the …

RAMVATIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ramvati, the mother‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, was charged under sections 85 and 80(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She applied for bail, arguing that there was no material to support a presumption of dowry death and that she had no prior criminal …

SMT PRAGATI PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school mark sheets to prove majority, affidavits confirming a consensual …

BHAGWAN PRASAD AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged an eviction and damages order, alleging that the district magistrate had illegally rejected their restoration application. They filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to compel the district magistrate to decide the pending restoration application within a fixed period and …