Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 7201–7400

SANTOSH KUMARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Santosh Kumari challenged the acquisition of her property by a notification dated 04‑02‑2026, having filed an objection under Section 15 of the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 which remained pending before the District Magistrate/Special Land Acquisition Officer, Jhansi. …

SMT. SOHITA DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a married couple, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of majority and affirmed that their marriage was entered …

SHRI SHAQIBversusSHRI SANJAY KUMAR MEENA, CHIEF EXEUTIVE OFFICER

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's judgment and order dated 28‑01‑2026 in Writ‑C No. 2800 of 2026. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but, consistent with procedural law, it did not issue a notice …

OM PRAKASH KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Om Prakash Kushwaha, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 20.08.2026 under Sections 106 and 123 of the BNS and a mandamus to restrain his arrest. After arguing, the petitioner’s counsel requested leave to withdraw the petition, …

RAKESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered the bail application of Rakesh Kumar, who was charged under sections 318(4), 61(2), 316(5) of the Indian Penal Code, sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 and section 66D of the Income‑Tax Act. The court noted that a …

SMT SANIYA KHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Saniya Khan and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove they are adults, …

SMT. JYOTI SAXENAversusAWADHESH SHARMA

Petitioner Smt. Jyoti Saxena filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Bijnor, to decide her pending divorce case (Case No. 240 of 2021) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, within a fixed time, alleging undue delay since …

DEEN MOHAMMAD AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Deen Mohammad and another filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 20.08.2026 under Sections 85, 352, 115(2), 79, 127(2) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and a direction that they not be arrested. They also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid …

MOHD. ANEESversusMANAGING DIRECTOR/CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohd. Anees, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the bank to consider his claim for appointment under the Dying in Harness Rules following his father's death while in service. He alleged that despite multiple representations, the bank had not acted on his request for a …

RAKESH KUMAR TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rakesh Kumar Tiwari, a Revenue Inspector, was arrested for allegedly demanding Rs 10,000 for land measurement, an offence punishable under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He has been in custody since 8 August 2026 and has no prior criminal record. The State …

M/S CHAURASIYA KHAN VIKRAITAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, M/s Chaurasiya Khan Vikraita, challenged the suspension of its fertilizer licence after 60 bags of DAP were seized, allegedly shipped by an unlicensed consigner under an invoice in the petitioner's name. The High Court held that the suspension should be stayed pending a hearing, …

SUMIT AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Sumit and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of U.P. and two others. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating they would pursue any other …

AJAY JAINversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ajay Jain applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 393 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 60(1) and 63 of the Excise Act. The applicant was not named in the original FIR; his name surfaced only after about two and a half …

M/S NUTECH SYSTEM CONTROLversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

M/S Nutech System Control filed a writ petition challenging an adjudication order dated 26 April 2024 issued by the State Tax Commissioner of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner argued that the hearing date was fixed on the same day as the personal hearing, which preceded the deadline for filing a reply …

M/S NUTECH SYSTEM CONTROLversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

M/S Nutech System Control challenged an adjudication order dated 09‑12‑2025 passed under Section 73 of the U.P. GST Act, 2017, on the ground that its GST registration had been cancelled on 15‑06‑2024 but the show‑cause notice was only issued electronically on 24‑09‑2025, leaving the petitioner …

SAJID HUSSAINversusSMT. PATASIYA DEVI AND ANOTHER

The plaintiff's suit was dismissed for want of prosecution, and the defendants had appeared on the scheduled date. The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking expeditious disposal of the related Miscellaneous Case No.73 of 2011, invoking Order IX Rule 9 of the CPC. The High Court …

MADHAV RAJ AGARWALversusUNION OF INDIA AND 8 OTHERS

Madhav Raj Agarwal, a person with low vision, claimed a reservation seat under the benchmark disability provision of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016. Although his medical board assessment recorded only 1% disability and the appellate board found no disability, a medical …

SATYAJEET YADAV @ VIRAT SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Satyajeet Yadav @ Virat Singh, applied for bail in a counterfeiting case (Cr. No. 182 of 2026) alleging false implication by police. He claimed the seized printers were not examined by a forensic lab, the arrest occurred without independent witnesses, and he has no prior criminal …

SHIVANI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State to refrain from interfering with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted that the …

SMT. KAUSHILYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Kaushilya, filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that she was being held in illegal custody by respondent No.4, Umesh Kumar. The petition sought the court's intervention to secure her release. After the filing of the petition, the alleged custodian restored her custody to her …

MAHARAJIYAversusAMARNATH AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant, Maharajiya, filed a contempt application (Civil) No. 6119 of 2026 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Counsel for the applicant sought to withdraw the application, citing incurable technical defects, and requested liberty to file a fresh application. The standing counsel …

MAHESH KUMAR TIWARIversusCHANDRA PRAKASH BAJPAYEE, CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, SADAR

The applicant, Mahesh Kumar Tiwari, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Consolidation Officer Chandra Prakash Bajpayee, willfully failed to comply with the High Court’s judgment and order dated 09‑05‑2023 in Writ‑B No.1813 of 2023. The applicant claimed that despite being …

IBRAHIMversusSTATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARY HOME UP AT LKO.

The applicant, Ibrahim, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking the trial court’s permission to accept a single personal bond and two sureties for all four criminal cases pending against him. He had already been granted bail in each case but was unable to furnish separate surety …

JAGPALversusSTATE OF UP

The applicant, husband of a woman who died by suicide within seven years of marriage, sought bail in a dowry death case (Criminal No. 175 of 2025) under Sections 85, 80(2) of the Bailable Non-suspect provisions and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He claimed false implication and no …

VIKAS SRIVASTAVA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Vikas Srivastava and another filed a habeas corpus petition (No. 912 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition was listed on 23 June 2026 and again on 8 September 2026, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the …

PRANJAL GARGversusUNION OF INDIA AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioner Pranjal Garg, who has a benchmark low‑vision disability of 60%, obtained a medical certificate confirming this disability but the Medical Board reduced his disability percentage to 30%, a finding the petitioner contended was beyond the Board’s authority. He approached the Allahabad High …

SMT JYOTI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The revisionists Smt. Jyoti and two others filed a criminal revision challenging an order of the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Banda, which directed opposite party No.2 to pay Rs.5,000 as rent and Rs.8,000 as maintenance per month, totaling Rs.13,000. They argued that the appellate court …

MOTAB ALIAS MEHTAB ANSARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Motab alias Mehtab Ansari was arrested in Crime No. 83 of 2025 under Sections 352, 351(4) and 64(1) of the B.N.S. for alleged offences including a later‑added rape allegation. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record, and that the victim’s rape claim was …

AARISH ROSHAN AND 6 OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, but their counsel later informed the court that the application should not be pursued due to factual defects in the compromise. The counsel requested that the application be dismissed as not pressed, …

SAMIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Samir was arrested in connection with a case registered as Crime No. 443 of 2024, alleging offences under IPC sections 376, 506, 328, 354, 509 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The FIR mentions an attempt to rape, while the victim’s statements are contradictory – one under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS …

VIPIN ALIAS AMARNATH DHARIKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vipin alias Amarnath Dharikar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5M/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences against a minor girl. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, …

GEETA PAL AND 9 OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and the entire criminal trial (Special Session Trial No. 853 of 2023) relating to offences under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) …

SANDHYA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Sandhya Singh filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order that granted maintenance of Rs.10,000 per month to her son but denied maintenance to herself and her daughter. She contended that the trial court failed to consider her allegation that her husband was cohabiting with his …

RAKESH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.3027/9 of 2005) arising from offences under Sections 498‑A, 504, 506, 342 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants and the second opposite party …

SHAMSHER SINGH ALIAS LALU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shamsher Singh alias Lalu Yadav, who was arrested in a murder case (Crime No. 81 of 2025) and alleged to have been falsely implicated. The applicant argued lack of eyewitness testimony, reliance on circumstantial evidence, and his clean record, …

CHANDRASENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

In a criminal revision (No. 6260 of 2024) filed by Chandrasen against the State of U.P. and two others, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the revision. The Additional Government Advocate for the State raised no objection to this request. The court considered whether a revision …

SHIVJI BAJPAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 27.05.2021 and the cognizance order dated 11.08.2021 in Criminal Case No. 95762 of 2021, alleging that the prosecution was instituted with mala fide intent. The court examined …

FIROZ AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHER

Petitioner Firoz filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that his brother Musharraf was being held illegally by respondent No.4, Momin. After filing, the custody of Musharraf was restored to Firoz. Petitioner's counsel then informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the petition. The …

VISHAL GIRIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Vishal Giri, who is charged under Section 105 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act for allegedly stabbing a deceased person during a quarrel. The applicant asserted that the incident was a sudden fight, that he …

RAM KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 1281 of 2023, which stemmed from an FIR alleging land fraud, forgery, and assault. The FIR alleged that the applicants, along with others, had fraudulently sold …

SADHANA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Sadhana Devi filed a maintenance application under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Family Court admitted the marriage but held that she was living separately from her husband without sufficient reason and consequently declined to decide the remaining points concerning her inability …

MEERA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petition filed by Meera Devi under Article 227 was listed before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the respondent’s counsel, Sanjay Singh, was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioner’s representation and observed that the petition had …

AJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay Kumar, who was arrested in a case involving alleged robbery and gang rape under several sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the victim's age was disputed (16 years 8 months …

NATTHU YADAV ALIAS ASHOK AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Natthu Yadav alias Ashok and another, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 29621 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners even after the revised call, while the learned …

RAEES KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Raees Khan, filed a petition under Article 227 challenging the dismissal of his complaint alleging that the respondent altered the amount on two cheques from Rs.3,000 to Rs.300,000, causing dishonour. The petitioner failed to produce any evidence of such alteration. The Chief …

OM MINOR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Om Minor and another, filed a habeas corpus writ petition (No.1182 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and three others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners and they failed to attend subsequent hearings, indicating a lack of interest in …

AKHATAR ALI @ AKHTAR HASAN @ ZIYAversusRAM BHAJAN GUPTA AND OTHERS

The appellant‑claimant sought enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for injuries sustained by her husband, Akhtar Ali, in a motorcycle collision on 28‑Oct‑2002. The tribunal had granted Rs 1,12,901.81 with interest, including medical expenses and attendant …

SUNITA DAS AND OTHERSversusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER

The appellants challenged the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s award of Rs.1,27,000 as inadequate compensation for the death of Umapad Das, a retired railway employee who earned a pension of Rs.3,000 per month and a private‑job income of Rs.3,000 per month. The High Court examined whether the …

MOHD ASHIFversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICS

The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed by Mohd Ashif, who is charged under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act for alleged involvement in a large‑scale tramadol and codeine seizure. The prosecution contended that Ashif was the main accused operating a …

RAVINDRAversusCHARU APRAIL PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ravindra, filed a civil miscellaneous review application (No. 90 of 2026) challenging an order dated 21 April 2026 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The court examined whether the limited scope of review jurisdiction permitted reopening the matter on its merits. It …

BAL APCHARI CHILD DELINQUENTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad entertained a criminal revision filed under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 on behalf of a juvenile in conflict with law whose bail had been denied by the Juvenile Justice Board and an Additional Sessions Judge. The …

UP STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusAYODHYA PRASAD AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Up State Road Transport Corporation, paid a retiring workman, Ayodhya Prasad, gratuity based on his last salary and later adjusted it under the 7th Pay Commission. The workman subsequently filed a claim before the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for …

RAJESH KUMAR CHAURASIA AND 2 OTHERSversusSURESH KAPOOR AND 3 OTHERS

The plaintiff sought eviction of the defendants for alleged non‑payment of rent, claiming a subsisting tenancy despite an agreement to sell dated 24‑12‑2002. The defendants argued that the agreement and a purported letter of possession terminated the tenancy, invoking protection under Section 53‑A …

SARTAZversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Sartaz, filed a second bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 27305 of 2026 after an earlier bail denial on 23 April 2026. He argued that four prosecution witnesses had already been examined and only formal witnesses remained, reducing the risk of influencing evidence, …

YADVENDRA PRATAP SHAHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Yadvendra Pratap Shahi held two arms licences issued in 1998 and 2003. An FIR lodged in 2015 alleged that he, along with co‑accused, disturbed the counting of votes, and the trial remains pending. In 2022 a notice was issued to cancel his licences, and the District Magistrate cancelled …

RAJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHER

The appellant Raj Kumar filed an intra‑court appeal 300 days after the impugned order, seeking condonation of delay and reversal of costs imposed on the affidavit deponent and 74 petitioners. The court found the cause shown for the delay sufficient and condoned the 300‑day delay. It examined the …

SAURABH SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

The appellants, five villagers, intervened in a writ petition seeking the completion of consolidation proceedings in Gram Sabha Biral, Muzaffarnagar, which had remained pending for over three decades. The Single Judge ordered the authorities to finish the consolidation within six months, relying on …

SMT. PRIYANSHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, an adult married couple, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction and police protection against alleged threats and interference by private respondents and family members. They submitted Aadhaar copies and a marriage registration application, asserting that they married …

SMT DEEPAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt. Deepa filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petitioner later filed a withdrawal application (Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No.4/2026) seeking to withdraw the writ petition. The court, after hearing counsel …

SMT. VIMLA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND OTHERS

DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Smt. Vimla Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against her. The State filed a charge sheet on 13 August 2024. The petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the writ petition, requesting liberty to pursue other legal remedies against the …

DR. MUKESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND OTHERS

DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN

Dr. Mukesh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against him. The State filed a charge sheet on 13‑08‑2024. The petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the writ petition, requesting liberty to pursue other remedies against the charge sheet. The court, …

SHIV NARAIN AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant had stood as surety for an accused in Sessions Trial No. 153 of 1981, furnishing a bond of Rs. 3,000. When the accused failed to appear, a criminal miscellaneous case was instituted under Section 446 of the Criminal Procedure Code and recovery warrants were issued against the …

SMT. ARPI GUPTA AND OTHERSversusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER

The claimants sought compensation for the death of Anil Kumar, who was crushed by a jeep while waiting on the roadside. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.1,77,000 based on a notional annual income of Rs.15,000 and a multiplier of 17, rejecting the claimants' evidence of a higher income. …

M/S KANCHAN AUTOMOBILESversusSMT. RITA KUSHWAHA AND OTHERS

The appellant Kanchan Automobiles appealed against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award that held it liable to pay Rs.2,71,150 as compensation for injuries sustained by the claimant Rita Kushwaha in a tractor accident on 23.08.2006. The appellant argued that the tractor had already been sold to …

CHANDRASHEKHAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, a shop‑keeper, was named in an FIR alleging assault, molestation, offences under the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act. He filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, the cognizance order and to stay the trial, claiming he was falsely implicated, …

NAVI MOHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Navi Mohmad, a businessman, challenged the attachment of his movable property (motorcycle, tractor, and a tipper) by the District Magistrate under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that no FIR under Section 3(1) of the Act was ever filed against him, …

DILEEP KUMAR OJHA AND 2 OTHERSversusSMT RAMA YADAV AND 4 OTHERS

The appellants appealed against a temporary injunction order dated 17‑03‑2026 granted by the Additional CJ/M Civil Judge in a suit concerning possession of land. The trial court later set aside that injunction order on 14‑08‑2026 after hearing a revision application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC, …

MOHIT AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 37979 of 2025) arising from charges under sections 85, 115(2), 351(2), 352 of the B.N.S.S. and sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicants and the second opposite party had reached …

MASLAHUDDIN and ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. TECHNICAL EDUCATION LKO.andORS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The petitioners, Maslahuddin and others, filed a writ petition (WRIT‑A No.‑20119 of 2021) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh represented by the Principal Secretary, Technical Education, Lucknow. The petition was argued by counsel …

BACHCHU LAL and ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. and OTHERS

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The petitioners, Bachchu Lal and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner or their counsel appeared to prosecute the petition, while counsel for the State was present. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may …

RAJENDRA DUTT SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. TECHNICAL EDU. and ORS.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Petitioner Rajendra Dutt Sharma filed Writ‑A No. 19931 of 2021 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of U.P. through the Principal Secretary, Technical Education and others. The petition was presented by counsel Mohammad Tauseef Siddiqui, while the …

SENDER SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.COOPERATIVE LUCKNOW AND ORS.

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for prosecution. No counsel represented the petitioners, while the State was represented. The court noted the absence of the petitioners and dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, …

MUNISH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in State v. Gopal (Case No. 1013 of 2017) which alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 IPC. They contended that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 …

PANKAJ NEMANIversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Pankaj Nemani filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 8388 of 2023) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. Notices were issued to the opposite parties, but they failed to take the required steps. The court noted the non‑compliance and dismissed the …

SAPAN KHANNA and ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. and ANR.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The applicants, Sapan Khanna and others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking relief. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application. The Court observed the absence of prosecution and consequently dismissed the application. The …

MAMTA SHUKLAversusTHE STATE OF U.P AND ANR.

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The applicant, Mamta Shukla, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 before the Allahabad High Court. No representative appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while counsel for the State was present. The Court …

RAM NARESH SINGHversusBRIJ MOHAN SHUKLA DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER SITAPUR

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Ram Naresh Singh filed a civil contempt application against Divisional Forest Officer Brij Mohan Shukla. The petitioner did not appear before the court, while the State's standing counsel was present. The court observed that, due to the passage of time, the contempt petition had become infructuous. …

RAM SINGHversusBRIJ MOHAN SHUKLA DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER SITAPUR

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Ram Singh filed a civil contempt application against Divisional Forest Officer Brij Mohan Shukla. The petitioner failed to appear before the court, and the standing counsel for the State was the only party present. The court observed that, owing to the passage of time, the contempt petition had …

AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEYversusGIRISH KUMAR SINGH DIST. INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS SULTANPUR

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

The applicant, Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, filed a civil contempt application against Girish Kumar Singh, District Inspector of Schools, Sultanpur. The matter was listed as non‑adjournable and was called before the bench. The applicant’s counsel did not appear and no request for adjournment was made. …

SHILPI DEVIversusSAUMYA GURU RANI, CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, HARDOI

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Shilpi Devi filed a civil contempt application against Saumya Guru Rani, the Chief Development Officer of Hardoi. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. On the scheduled date, the applicant’s counsel, Babita Singh and Sandhya Devi, were not present and no request for …

THAKUR PRASADversusRELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. LUCKNOW and 5 OTHERS

Dismissed on merits/Rejected

The appellant, Thakur Prasad, filed a first appeal against an order dated 2016 but failed to appear before the court. No request for adjournment or any other submission was made by the appellant. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal for non‑prosecution. The interim order that was in …

BHOORA @ VIMALESH AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF U.P AND ANR.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The applicant Bhoora @ Vimalesh and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No appearance was made on behalf of the petitioner. Consequently, the court found that the application could not be proceeded with. The judge dismissed the application …

AJEET VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. and ANR.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Ajeet Verma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 954 of 2017) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The applicant failed to appear before the court to press the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The …

VIVEK KUMARversusFOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA THRU. M.D. KHADYA SADAN and ORS.

Dismissed on merits/Rejected

Vivek Kumar filed a writ petition against the Food Corporation of India. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition. Counsel for the State was present, but the petitioner’s counsel was absent. The court dismissed the petition on the ground of want of prosecution. Consequently, …

SHRAVAN KUMAR SINGHversusANOOP KUMAR DISTT.INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS GONDA

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

The petitioner, Shravan Kumar Singh, filed a civil contempt application against Anoop Kumar, District Inspector of Schools, Gonda. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, but the petitioner's counsel, Saryu Prasad Tiwari, was absent and no request for adjournment was …

SHIV RAM TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Shiv Ram Tiwari filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No counsel appeared for the applicant, while the Additional Government Advocate represented the State. An interim order had earlier been granted in favour of the …

RAJAT BAJPAIversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN SECY. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Rajat Bajpai filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 5811 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was filed by a team of counsel including P.R.S. Bajpai and others, while the State was represented by C.S.C., Ganesh Kumar Gupta …

VIPIN JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. GOVT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

Vipin Jaiswal applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 CrPC in connection with Crime No.423 of 2024, which alleged offences under IPC sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2). He claimed he was falsely implicated, noting that co‑accused Gaurav Jaiswal and Pankaj Jaiswal had already …

RAM PRATAP AND ORS.versusSMT. SHOBHAJI AND ORS.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The appellant Ram Pratap and others filed a second appeal before the Allahabad High Court. On the day of hearing, none of the appellant's counsel appeared, while the respondent's counsel, R.K. Srivastava, was present. The court noted the appellant's absence and, after confirming that no …

SHEORAJ SINGHversusPRIN. SECY. SICHAI AVAM JAL SANSADHAN JAL VIBHAG and OTHERS

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 14014 of 2017 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No petitioner appeared to press the petition before the Court. Counsel for the State was present and represented the respondents. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. …

SMT. MEENA DEVIversusU.O.I. THRU SECY.MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVT. OF INDIA and ORS.

Disposed off/Decided on merits

Petitioner Smt. Meena Devi filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the Union of India and others. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the petition. Counsel for the State was present. The Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. The …

DIVYA PRAKASH MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. and ANOTHER

DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN

The applicant, Divya Prakash Mishra, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant failed to appear before the court on multiple scheduled dates, including the last hearing on 23 November 2022, while counsel for the State and the second opposite party were …

HASEENA BANOversusSTATE OF U.P. and ANR.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was listed before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant, Haseena Bano, was represented by counsel Om Prakash Misra, while the State was represented by the Government Advocate. On the scheduled date, the applicant's counsel did not …

DEO RAJ SINGHversusDISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS DISTT. FAIZABAD AND 2 ORS.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

Petitioner Deo Raj Singh filed Writ Petition (A) No. 6134 of 2001 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the District Inspector of Schools, Faizabad and two others. The petition was listed before the Bench of Hon'ble Justice Rajan Roy. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner …

LAJWANTI SAMSONversusSANJAY GANDHI P.G.INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES THRU.REGISTR

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The petitioner, Lajwanti Samson, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the petition. Counsel for the State was present. The Court observed that the petition could not be prosecuted due to the absence of the petitioner …

BHARATDWAJversusVASDEV and ORS.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

In Civil Revision No. 84 of 2019, the revisionist Bharatdwaj filed a petition against Vasdev and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and there was no request for adjournment. The court noted the absence of representation and dismissed the petition in default on 10 July 2024. The …

KANEEZ TAHIRA RIZVIversusSTATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRIN SECY REVENUE AND 3 ORS

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The petitioner, Kaneez Tahira Rizvi, filed a writ petition (Writ A No. 3002 of 2005) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging actions of the State of U.P. Through Principal Secretary Revenue and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and the matter had been …

AMAR KUMARversusSHRI SADAKANT PRIN.SECY.HOUSING and URBAN DEVELOPMENT LKO.andORS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Amar Kumar filed a civil contempt application (No. 1721 of 2014) against Shri Sadakant, Principal Secretary, Housing and Urban Development, Lucknow. The petitioner failed to appear in court and did not seek any adjournment. Counsel for the respondent, Nadeem Murtaza and Ratnesh Chandra, were …

HEMLATA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.THRU.PRIN.SECY. FOOD and CIVIL SUPPLIES and ORS.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 9274 of 2021) was filed by Hemlata Singh against the State of U.P. and others. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition, although counsel for the State was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioner and the lack of prosecution of the …

LAL DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Lal Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to ensure that a non‑cognizable report (NCR) be lodged against several accused at Ikauna Police Station, based on earlier orders dated 26‑03‑2019 and 04‑05‑2019. The State responded that a charge‑sheet had …

KARUNA SADAN DIXITversusSTATE OF U.P. and ANR.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The applicant, Karuna Sadan Dixit, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 4515 of 2017) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The application was to be heard in Court No. 14 before Hon'ble Justice Prakash Singh. No …

VERENDRA SINGHversusU.P.S.R.T.C. THRU. REGIONAL MANAGER REGIONAL OFFICER FAIZABA

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The appellant, Verendra Singh, filed a first appeal against an order dated 2011 from the U.P.S.R.T.C. through its Regional Manager. The appeal was filed after a considerable delay, and the appellant failed to appear before the court to seek condonation of the delay. The court noted that no counsel …

JIYAUL HASAN and ORS.versusRAJPAL SINGH ENGINEER IN CHIEF P.W.D. LUCKNOW

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The petitioners, Jiyaul Hasan and others, filed a contempt application (Civil) No. 1587 of 2020 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, alleging that the respondent, Rajpal Singh, Engineer-in-Chief, P.W.D., Lucknow, had failed to comply with a prior judgment and order. The petitioners, …

MRS. VARUNAversusSTATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECY.BASIC EDUCATION LKO.AND ORS.

Dismissed on merits/Rejected

Mrs. Varuna filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition, although counsel for the State was present. The court observed that the petition could not be prosecuted in the absence …

MOHD. SHAMSHADversusSHLOK KUMAR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE HAMIRPUR

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Mohd. Shamshad filed a civil contempt petition (No. 1205 of 2020) against Shlok Kumar, Superintendent of Police, Hamirpur. The petitioner’s counsel did not appear, and no adjournment was sought. State counsel Sanjay Trivedi appeared and submitted that the order of the Writ Court had been complied …

GOVIND RAJversusSTATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECY.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

Petitioner Govind Raj filed a writ petition (WRIT‑A No. 5469 of 2001) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, while the State of U.P. was represented by its standing counsel. The Court observed that the petition could not be pursued due …

AJUGYA NARAIN TIWARI AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF U.P AND ANR.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief, but no applicant appeared before the court. The State's counsel was present. The High Court dismissed the application on the ground of want of prosecution, …

GOVIND RAJversusNAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD AYODHYA AND 6 ORS.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The petitioner, Govind Raj, filed Writ A No. 5351 of 2000 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against Nagar Palika Parishad Ayodhya and six others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. Consequently, the Court noted the lack of prosecution …

PUSHPA GAURversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.BASIC EDU. UP GOVT. and ANOTHER

Dismissed on merits/Rejected

The petitioner, Pushpa Gaur, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for prosecution. The State counsel was present, while no representative appeared for the petitioner. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and dismissed the petition for want of …

VIKASH GAUTAMversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.PANCHAYATI RAJ CIVIL SECTTandORS.

Dismissed on merits/Rejected

The petitioner, Vikash Gautam, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while counsel for the State was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and dismissed the …

VIJAY KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.PANCHAYATI RAJ LUCKNOW and ORS.

Dismissed on merits/Rejected

The petitioner, Vijay Kumar Yadav, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while counsel for the State was present. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have been in …

LAL BAHADURversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.CANE DEVELOPMENT and SUGAR and ORS.

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 19772 of 2016) was filed by Lal Bahadur before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition, although counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioner and consequently dismissed …

SHIV PRASAD TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Shiv Prasad Tiwari filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 4304 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. The petition was filed through counsel Sudhakar Mishra, while the State was represented by G.A. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and …

CHHOTEY LAL JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P.THROUGH ITS SECY. BASIC EDUCATION CIVIL SECTT

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

Petitioner Chhotey Lal Jaiswal filed Writ A No. 3498 of 2011 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. through its Secretary, Basic Education Civil Section. The petition was listed but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ. The Court …

SHIV KUMARI AND ORS.versusTHE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.THRO BRANCH MANAGER and ORS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Shiv Kumari and others filed a first appeal against an order dated 2017 passed by The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. The appeal was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the High Court Rules, 1952. No party, including the appellant or the respondent, …

RAKESH KUMAR SHUKLAversusDIRECTOR OF EDUCATION U.P.AT ALLAHABAD AND 2 ORS

Disposed off/Decided on merits

Rakesh Kumar Shukla filed a writ petition (No. 1476 of 2005) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging the Director of Education, U.P., and others. No counsel appeared for the petitioner and no request for adjournment was made. The court noted the absence of representation and the …

MUKESH KUMARversusMUNNA LAL AND 2 OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Mukesh Kumar filed a first appeal against the order dated 2023. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant to press the appeal, and no request for adjournment was made. The High Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that may have been in force was …

DILIP KUMAR GAUTAM and ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. and ANOTHER

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The applicants, Dilip Kumar Gautam and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, but the applicants failed to appear or prosecute the …

ASHOK KUMARversusSMT.GEETA SINGH PRESIDENT CO-OP.WHOLESALE SOCIETY GONDA andANR

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Ashok Kumar filed a civil contempt petition (No. 1880 of 2020) against Smt. Geeta Singh, President of a Co‑Operative Wholesale Society. The petition was listed for hearing without any request for adjournment. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The Court observed …

RAJDEEP SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The applicant, Rajdeep Srivastava, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking continuation of interim protection that had been granted during mediation. The matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Center, which reported that no settlement was reached …

DHANI RAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.THRU.THE PRIN SECY P.W.D. CIVIL SECTT.LKO and ORS

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The petitioner, Dhani Ram Yadav, filed Writ Petition No. 7670 of 2014 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the date of hearing, and no request for adjournment was made. The …

RAKESH BAHADUR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN. SECY. LAND DEVELOPMENT AND ORS.

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

The petitioner, Rakesh Bahadur Singh, filed Writ Petition No. 13243 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of U.P. The petition was listed under the ‘cases shall not be adjourned’ category. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the …

ALIM ABBASversusMR.DEEPAK KUMAR and 2 ORS.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Alim Abbas filed a contempt application against Mr. Deepak Kumar and two others. The matter was listed under the heading “These matters, be not adjourned”. Neither the counsel for the applicant nor the counsel for the opposite parties appeared before the court, and no request for adjournment was …

MOHD ISRAILversusRAJENDRA PRATAP DIOS ANDAMBEDKAR NAGAR

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The applicant, Mohd Israil, filed a civil contempt application against Rajendra Pratap Dios Andambedkar Nagar. The applicant failed to appear before the court to prosecute the application, although the standing counsel was present to assist. The court noted the absence of the applicant and the lack …

MALKHAN SINGHversusPRAMOD KUMAR and 3 OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Malkhan Singh filed a first appeal against Order No. 270 of 2017. The appellant failed to appear before the court and made no request for adjournment or to press the appeal. The court noted the absence of any prosecution of the appeal. Consequently, the bench dismissed the appeal for want of …

LAXMI KANT JHA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. TRANSPORT LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The petitioners filed a writ petition (WRIT‑A No. 11130 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of U.P. The petition was listed but the petitioners failed to appear before the court and made no request for adjournment. The court noted the absence of …

SHATRUGHAN MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The applicant, Shatrughan Mishra, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief in a criminal matter. No representative appeared on behalf of the applicant, while counsel for the State was present. The Court dismissed the …

Satya Narain SinghversusUnion of India THRU. PRIN. SECY., MIN. OF C.P.W.D. AND others

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Satya Narain Singh filed a civil miscellaneous arbitration application before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf to press the application, and he made no request for a pass over or adjournment. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the application. Consequently, the …

VISHWANATH PATELversusSTATE OF U.P. THORUGH SECY. SECONDARY EDU.LUCKNOW AND ORS

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

Vishwanath Patel filed a writ petition (WRIT‑A No. 4665 of 2011) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted an illness slip, but the court had repeatedly ordered that the case should not be further adjourned. Since the petition, originally filed in 2011, …

DINESH CHANDRA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The applicant, Dinesh Chandra Sharma, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a criminal revision order dated 31.08.2024 and a civil summoning order dated 29.02.2024. The parties had earlier been directed to appear before the Mediation and Conciliation …

SHARDENDU SHUKLAversusKING GEORGE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY LUCKNOW THROUGH REGISTRAR

Disposed off/Decided on merits

Shardendu Shukla filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 7463 of 2004) against King George Medical University, Lucknow. The petition was listed as an oldest case but the petitioner failed to appear even after a revised call. The respondent’s counsel and the Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State …

BASANT KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The applicant, Basant Kumar Singh, sought cancellation of a bail order dated 22‑12‑2023 that had been granted to the opposite party No. 2 in a case under IPC sections 387, 427 and 506. The request was based on an alleged assault by the bailee on an informant, resulting in a gun‑shot injury, for …

GIRESH MOHAN SRIVASTAVA AND ORS.versusCHANDRA MOHAN AND ORS.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The appellant, Giresh Mohan Srivastava and others, filed a second appeal (Defective No. 34 of 2016) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. The appellant’s counsel, M.A. Siddiqui, was listed but no representative appeared to prosecute the appeal. The court was required to determine whether …

VINOD KUMAR MISHRA @ VIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The applicant, Vinod Kumar Mishra, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief against the State. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the State’s counsel was present. The High Court observed that the …

AWDHESH KUMAR PANDEYversusTHE U.P. POWER CORPORATION LTD. THRU CHAIRMAN and 3 ORS

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The petitioner, Awdhesh Kumar Pandey, filed a writ petition against the U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, with counsel Pt S Chandra and N.N. Jaiswal representing him, while the respondent was represented by Sandeep Dixit and Sudeep Dixit. The bench, …

SHAILENDRA KUMAR ATTversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDUCATION and 3 ORS.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The petitioner, Shailendra Kumar, filed a writ petition (WRIT-A No. 6786 of 2006) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and the standing counsel for the respondent was the only party present. The court …

JANARDAN PRASAD SHUKLA and ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. and ANR.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court's intervention in a criminal proceeding. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application, although the State's Government Advocate was present. The Court observed the …

HITESH @ HITESH KUMAR AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Disposed off/Decided on merits

Petitioners Hitesh Kumar and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 29‑08‑2025 (Crime No. 50 of 2025) alleging offences under sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 64 and 82 of the Indian Penal Code, the Dowry Prohibition Act and other statutes, and also …

LALIT KUMAR AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but their counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had already been filed in the underlying case and therefore they did not wish to pursue the writ further. The court accepted this position and dismissed the writ …

SURESH SONI and ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY.HOME DEPTT. and ANR.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The petitioners, Suresh Soni and others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 2748 of 2017) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the application, while the learned Additional Government …

UMA KANTversusTHE STATE OF U.P. and ANR.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The applicant, Uma Kant, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023, seeking relief from the trial court. No representative appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while counsel for the State was present. The High …

SARMOD AND ANOTHERversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The applicants Sarmod and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 11905 of 2021) before the Allahabad High Court, seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application, although the …

SMT. PUSHPA SHARMAversusTHE STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME and ORS.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The applicant, Smt. Pushpa Sharma, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The High Court, …

MST. RAJA BETIversusBOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS

Mst. Raja Beti filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the Board of Revenue. The petition was listed under the 'Oldest Pending Cases' for priority hearing. No counsel or party appeared to press the petition on the scheduled date. The Court observed that the …

RAM AUTARversusSTATE

Ram Autar filed a criminal appeal (No. 699 of 1987) against the State in the Allahabad High Court. The appellant died, as confirmed by a letter dated 23.04.2026 from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahr. No application was filed by the legal heirs to continue the appeal. The Court noted the …

PRANSHU RAI @ PRIYANSHU RAI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants Pranshu Rai and two others appealed to the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash the summoning and cognizance order dated 14-10-2025 and the entire Sessions Trial proceedings arising under several provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. …

SUNIL HITECH ENGINEERS LIMITEDversusBHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED

Sunil Hitech Engineers Ltd filed an application under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve its dispute with Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. The court examined the consent of former High Court Judge O.P. Garg to act as …

VIRENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The applicant, Virendra Singh, was arrested in connection with a road‑traffic accident on 30‑08‑2025 that resulted in the death of a man. The FIR, lodged on 08‑09‑2025, alleged that the applicant and co‑accused had struck the deceased's scooter with a Bolero car, causing fatal injuries. The …

SACHIN KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the …

NITIN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Nitin Kumar, who is accused in a case under Section 316(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant asserted his innocence, highlighted a deposit of Rs.90,697 …

LAKHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Lakhan Singh in a 2014 FIR alleging misappropriation of scholarship funds, with charges under IPC sections 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B. The applicant contended that the charge‑sheet was filed without solid …

JITENDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

Jitendra Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS No. 1199 of 2026) against the State of U.P. The applicant's counsel, Arunesh Datta, informed the court that the application had become infructuous and requested its dismissal. The court …

MOHD TAHIR @ TEHRIRversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Mohd. Tahir @ Tehrir, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 465 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 109, 127(2), 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the IPC, alleging assault causing serious injury. The first bail application had been rejected. The applicant …

RAM RATANversusCOMMISSIONER GORAKHPUR DIVISION GORAKHPUR and OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Ratan, was initially engaged on a temporary basis as a Chaukidar from 1991 and later regularized in 1992, but his appointment was repeatedly treated as temporary. After a 1993 judgment allowed him to continue as a temporary employee, he was terminated on 3 December 1996 following …

ROHIT TIWARI @ GOREversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered the bail application filed by Rohit Tiwari @ Gore against the State of U.P. The application was heard before Justice Rajiv Lochan Shukla. No detailed facts or legal arguments were recorded in the short order. The court allowed the bail application, referring to …

JITENDRA PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Jitendra Prasad, who is charged with offences under Sections 115(2), 351(2), 109, 352 of the BNS Act and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

M/S GLOBLE STEELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

M/S Globle Steel filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and two others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the hearing date. The Court observed that the petition was not being prosecuted. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of …

ARJUN KUMAR @ ARJUN RAJBHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Arjun Kumar, who is charged under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 351(3) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly receiving Rs 13 lakh in exchange for …

TARUN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 12282 of 2025) arising under Section 318(4) of the B.N.S. and Section 63 of the Copyright Act. The applicant argued that he had not been …