Santosh Kumari challenged the acquisition of her property by a notification dated 04‑02‑2026, having filed an objection under Section 15 of the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 which remained pending before the District Magistrate/Special Land Acquisition Officer, Jhansi. …
The petitioners, a married couple, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of majority and affirmed that their marriage was entered …
The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's judgment and order dated 28‑01‑2026 in Writ‑C No. 2800 of 2026. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but, consistent with procedural law, it did not issue a notice …
The petitioner, Om Prakash Kushwaha, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 20.08.2026 under Sections 106 and 123 of the BNS and a mandamus to restrain his arrest. After arguing, the petitioner’s counsel requested leave to withdraw the petition, …
The High Court considered the bail application of Rakesh Kumar, who was charged under sections 318(4), 61(2), 316(5) of the Indian Penal Code, sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 and section 66D of the Income‑Tax Act. The court noted that a …
The petitioners, Smt. Saniya Khan and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove they are adults, …
Petitioner Smt. Jyoti Saxena filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Bijnor, to decide her pending divorce case (Case No. 240 of 2021) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, within a fixed time, alleging undue delay since …
The petitioners Deen Mohammad and another filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 20.08.2026 under Sections 85, 352, 115(2), 79, 127(2) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and a direction that they not be arrested. They also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid …
The petitioner, Mohd. Anees, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the bank to consider his claim for appointment under the Dying in Harness Rules following his father's death while in service. He alleged that despite multiple representations, the bank had not acted on his request for a …
The petitioners, Chimera Infrastructure Private Limited, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an order dated 03‑08‑2026 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, CGST. The petitioners had earlier invoked the statutory remedy provided under Rule 86A(2) of the CGST Rules, 2017, to …
The applicant, Rakesh Kumar Tiwari, a Revenue Inspector, was arrested for allegedly demanding Rs 10,000 for land measurement, an offence punishable under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He has been in custody since 8 August 2026 and has no prior criminal record. The State …
The petitioner, M/s Chaurasiya Khan Vikraita, challenged the suspension of its fertilizer licence after 60 bags of DAP were seized, allegedly shipped by an unlicensed consigner under an invoice in the petitioner's name. The High Court held that the suspension should be stayed pending a hearing, …
The petitioners Sumit and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of U.P. and two others. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating they would pursue any other …
Ajay Jain applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 393 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 60(1) and 63 of the Excise Act. The applicant was not named in the original FIR; his name surfaced only after about two and a half …
M/S Nutech System Control filed a writ petition challenging an adjudication order dated 26 April 2024 issued by the State Tax Commissioner of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner argued that the hearing date was fixed on the same day as the personal hearing, which preceded the deadline for filing a reply …
M/S Nutech System Control challenged an adjudication order dated 09‑12‑2025 passed under Section 73 of the U.P. GST Act, 2017, on the ground that its GST registration had been cancelled on 15‑06‑2024 but the show‑cause notice was only issued electronically on 24‑09‑2025, leaving the petitioner …
The plaintiff's suit was dismissed for want of prosecution, and the defendants had appeared on the scheduled date. The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking expeditious disposal of the related Miscellaneous Case No.73 of 2011, invoking Order IX Rule 9 of the CPC. The High Court …
Petitioner Devendar Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (Northern Meerut) to conclude MACP No. 301 of 2024 within a fixed period. The petition argued that the claim had been pending since 2024 and further delay served no useful purpose. The …
Madhav Raj Agarwal, a person with low vision, claimed a reservation seat under the benchmark disability provision of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016. Although his medical board assessment recorded only 1% disability and the appellate board found no disability, a medical …
The accused, Satyajeet Yadav @ Virat Singh, applied for bail in a counterfeiting case (Cr. No. 182 of 2026) alleging false implication by police. He claimed the seized printers were not examined by a forensic lab, the arrest occurred without independent witnesses, and he has no prior criminal …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State to refrain from interfering with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted that the …
The petitioner, Smt. Kaushilya, filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that she was being held in illegal custody by respondent No.4, Umesh Kumar. The petition sought the court's intervention to secure her release. After the filing of the petition, the alleged custodian restored her custody to her …
The applicant, Maharajiya, filed a contempt application (Civil) No. 6119 of 2026 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Counsel for the applicant sought to withdraw the application, citing incurable technical defects, and requested liberty to file a fresh application. The standing counsel …
The applicant, Mahesh Kumar Tiwari, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Consolidation Officer Chandra Prakash Bajpayee, willfully failed to comply with the High Court’s judgment and order dated 09‑05‑2023 in Writ‑B No.1813 of 2023. The applicant claimed that despite being …
The applicant, Ibrahim, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking the trial court’s permission to accept a single personal bond and two sureties for all four criminal cases pending against him. He had already been granted bail in each case but was unable to furnish separate surety …
The applicant, husband of a woman who died by suicide within seven years of marriage, sought bail in a dowry death case (Criminal No. 175 of 2025) under Sections 85, 80(2) of the Bailable Non-suspect provisions and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He claimed false implication and no …
Vikas Srivastava and another filed a habeas corpus petition (No. 912 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition was listed on 23 June 2026 and again on 8 September 2026, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the …
Petitioner Pranjal Garg, who has a benchmark low‑vision disability of 60%, obtained a medical certificate confirming this disability but the Medical Board reduced his disability percentage to 30%, a finding the petitioner contended was beyond the Board’s authority. He approached the Allahabad High …
The revisionists Smt. Jyoti and two others filed a criminal revision challenging an order of the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Banda, which directed opposite party No.2 to pay Rs.5,000 as rent and Rs.8,000 as maintenance per month, totaling Rs.13,000. They argued that the appellate court …
Motab alias Mehtab Ansari was arrested in Crime No. 83 of 2025 under Sections 352, 351(4) and 64(1) of the B.N.S. for alleged offences including a later‑added rape allegation. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record, and that the victim’s rape claim was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, but their counsel later informed the court that the application should not be pursued due to factual defects in the compromise. The counsel requested that the application be dismissed as not pressed, …
Samir was arrested in connection with a case registered as Crime No. 443 of 2024, alleging offences under IPC sections 376, 506, 328, 354, 509 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The FIR mentions an attempt to rape, while the victim’s statements are contradictory – one under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vipin alias Amarnath Dharikar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5M/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences against a minor girl. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and the entire criminal trial (Special Session Trial No. 853 of 2023) relating to offences under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) …
Sandhya Singh filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order that granted maintenance of Rs.10,000 per month to her son but denied maintenance to herself and her daughter. She contended that the trial court failed to consider her allegation that her husband was cohabiting with his …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.3027/9 of 2005) arising from offences under Sections 498‑A, 504, 506, 342 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants and the second opposite party …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shamsher Singh alias Lalu Yadav, who was arrested in a murder case (Crime No. 81 of 2025) and alleged to have been falsely implicated. The applicant argued lack of eyewitness testimony, reliance on circumstantial evidence, and his clean record, …
In a criminal revision (No. 6260 of 2024) filed by Chandrasen against the State of U.P. and two others, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the revision. The Additional Government Advocate for the State raised no objection to this request. The court considered whether a revision …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 27.05.2021 and the cognizance order dated 11.08.2021 in Criminal Case No. 95762 of 2021, alleging that the prosecution was instituted with mala fide intent. The court examined …
Petitioner Firoz filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that his brother Musharraf was being held illegally by respondent No.4, Momin. After filing, the custody of Musharraf was restored to Firoz. Petitioner's counsel then informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the petition. The …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Vishal Giri, who is charged under Section 105 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act for allegedly stabbing a deceased person during a quarrel. The applicant asserted that the incident was a sudden fight, that he …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 1281 of 2023, which stemmed from an FIR alleging land fraud, forgery, and assault. The FIR alleged that the applicants, along with others, had fraudulently sold …
Sadhana Devi filed a maintenance application under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Family Court admitted the marriage but held that she was living separately from her husband without sufficient reason and consequently declined to decide the remaining points concerning her inability …
The petition filed by Meera Devi under Article 227 was listed before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the respondent’s counsel, Sanjay Singh, was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioner’s representation and observed that the petition had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay Kumar, who was arrested in a case involving alleged robbery and gang rape under several sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the victim's age was disputed (16 years 8 months …
The petitioners, Natthu Yadav alias Ashok and another, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 29621 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners even after the revised call, while the learned …
The petitioner, Raees Khan, filed a petition under Article 227 challenging the dismissal of his complaint alleging that the respondent altered the amount on two cheques from Rs.3,000 to Rs.300,000, causing dishonour. The petitioner failed to produce any evidence of such alteration. The Chief …
The petitioners, Om Minor and another, filed a habeas corpus writ petition (No.1182 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and three others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners and they failed to attend subsequent hearings, indicating a lack of interest in …
Ramashray Singh Yadav filed a writ petition in the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash a Government Order dated 18‑03‑2020 and to set aside a Departmental Promotion Committee recommendation so that he could be promoted to Manager (General). The court discovered that the …
The appellant‑claimant sought enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for injuries sustained by her husband, Akhtar Ali, in a motorcycle collision on 28‑Oct‑2002. The tribunal had granted Rs 1,12,901.81 with interest, including medical expenses and attendant …
The appellants challenged the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s award of Rs.1,27,000 as inadequate compensation for the death of Umapad Das, a retired railway employee who earned a pension of Rs.3,000 per month and a private‑job income of Rs.3,000 per month. The High Court examined whether the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed by Mohd Ashif, who is charged under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act for alleged involvement in a large‑scale tramadol and codeine seizure. The prosecution contended that Ashif was the main accused operating a …
The applicant, Ravindra, filed a civil miscellaneous review application (No. 90 of 2026) challenging an order dated 21 April 2026 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The court examined whether the limited scope of review jurisdiction permitted reopening the matter on its merits. It …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained a criminal revision filed under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 on behalf of a juvenile in conflict with law whose bail had been denied by the Juvenile Justice Board and an Additional Sessions Judge. The …
The petitioner, Up State Road Transport Corporation, paid a retiring workman, Ayodhya Prasad, gratuity based on his last salary and later adjusted it under the 7th Pay Commission. The workman subsequently filed a claim before the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for …
The plaintiff sought eviction of the defendants for alleged non‑payment of rent, claiming a subsisting tenancy despite an agreement to sell dated 24‑12‑2002. The defendants argued that the agreement and a purported letter of possession terminated the tenancy, invoking protection under Section 53‑A …
The accused, Sartaz, filed a second bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 27305 of 2026 after an earlier bail denial on 23 April 2026. He argued that four prosecution witnesses had already been examined and only formal witnesses remained, reducing the risk of influencing evidence, …
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking condonation of a 44‑day delay in filing a Section 34 application challenging an arbitral award. The appellant claimed he had no knowledge of the arbitration proceedings and that the award was …
Petitioner Yadvendra Pratap Shahi held two arms licences issued in 1998 and 2003. An FIR lodged in 2015 alleged that he, along with co‑accused, disturbed the counting of votes, and the trial remains pending. In 2022 a notice was issued to cancel his licences, and the District Magistrate cancelled …
The appellant Raj Kumar filed an intra‑court appeal 300 days after the impugned order, seeking condonation of delay and reversal of costs imposed on the affidavit deponent and 74 petitioners. The court found the cause shown for the delay sufficient and condoned the 300‑day delay. It examined the …
The appellants, five villagers, intervened in a writ petition seeking the completion of consolidation proceedings in Gram Sabha Biral, Muzaffarnagar, which had remained pending for over three decades. The Single Judge ordered the authorities to finish the consolidation within six months, relying on …
The petitioners, an adult married couple, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction and police protection against alleged threats and interference by private respondents and family members. They submitted Aadhaar copies and a marriage registration application, asserting that they married …
A writ petition was filed by Prakash Chand against the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and only the standing counsel appeared for one of the respondents. No representation was made for the other respondent. The Court …
Petitioner Smt. Deepa filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petitioner later filed a withdrawal application (Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No.4/2026) seeking to withdraw the writ petition. The court, after hearing counsel …
Petitioner Smt. Vimla Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against her. The State filed a charge sheet on 13 August 2024. The petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the writ petition, requesting liberty to pursue other legal remedies against the …
Dr. Mukesh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against him. The State filed a charge sheet on 13‑08‑2024. The petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the writ petition, requesting liberty to pursue other remedies against the charge sheet. The court, …
The appellant had stood as surety for an accused in Sessions Trial No. 153 of 1981, furnishing a bond of Rs. 3,000. When the accused failed to appear, a criminal miscellaneous case was instituted under Section 446 of the Criminal Procedure Code and recovery warrants were issued against the …
The claimants sought compensation for the death of Anil Kumar, who was crushed by a jeep while waiting on the roadside. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.1,77,000 based on a notional annual income of Rs.15,000 and a multiplier of 17, rejecting the claimants' evidence of a higher income. …
The appellant Kanchan Automobiles appealed against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award that held it liable to pay Rs.2,71,150 as compensation for injuries sustained by the claimant Rita Kushwaha in a tractor accident on 23.08.2006. The appellant argued that the tractor had already been sold to …
The applicant, a shop‑keeper, was named in an FIR alleging assault, molestation, offences under the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act. He filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, the cognizance order and to stay the trial, claiming he was falsely implicated, …
Navi Mohmad, a businessman, challenged the attachment of his movable property (motorcycle, tractor, and a tipper) by the District Magistrate under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that no FIR under Section 3(1) of the Act was ever filed against him, …
The appellants appealed against a temporary injunction order dated 17‑03‑2026 granted by the Additional CJ/M Civil Judge in a suit concerning possession of land. The trial court later set aside that injunction order on 14‑08‑2026 after hearing a revision application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 37979 of 2025) arising from charges under sections 85, 115(2), 351(2), 352 of the B.N.S.S. and sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicants and the second opposite party had reached …
The petitioners, Maslahuddin and others, filed a writ petition (WRIT‑A No.‑20119 of 2021) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh represented by the Principal Secretary, Technical Education, Lucknow. The petition was argued by counsel …
The petitioners, Bachchu Lal and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner or their counsel appeared to prosecute the petition, while counsel for the State was present. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may …
Petitioner Rajendra Dutt Sharma filed Writ‑A No. 19931 of 2021 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of U.P. through the Principal Secretary, Technical Education and others. The petition was presented by counsel Mohammad Tauseef Siddiqui, while the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for prosecution. No counsel represented the petitioners, while the State was represented. The court noted the absence of the petitioners and dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in State v. Gopal (Case No. 1013 of 2017) which alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 IPC. They contended that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 …
Petitioner Sahaj Ram filed Writ‑A No. 339 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging actions of the State of U.P. through the Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department and two others. The petition was initially grouped with a batch of petitions, including Writ‑A No. 11575 …
Pankaj Nemani filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 8388 of 2023) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. Notices were issued to the opposite parties, but they failed to take the required steps. The court noted the non‑compliance and dismissed the …
The applicants, Sapan Khanna and others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking relief. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application. The Court observed the absence of prosecution and consequently dismissed the application. The …
Satish Kumar filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The application was listed before the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court. No counsel or party appeared to argue or press the application on the scheduled date. …
The applicant, Mamta Shukla, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 before the Allahabad High Court. No representative appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while counsel for the State was present. The Court …
Ram Naresh Singh filed a civil contempt application against Divisional Forest Officer Brij Mohan Shukla. The petitioner did not appear before the court, while the State's standing counsel was present. The court observed that, due to the passage of time, the contempt petition had become infructuous. …
Ram Singh filed a civil contempt application against Divisional Forest Officer Brij Mohan Shukla. The petitioner failed to appear before the court, and the standing counsel for the State was the only party present. The court observed that, owing to the passage of time, the contempt petition had …
The applicant, Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, filed a civil contempt application against Girish Kumar Singh, District Inspector of Schools, Sultanpur. The matter was listed as non‑adjournable and was called before the bench. The applicant’s counsel did not appear and no request for adjournment was made. …
Shilpi Devi filed a civil contempt application against Saumya Guru Rani, the Chief Development Officer of Hardoi. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. On the scheduled date, the applicant’s counsel, Babita Singh and Sandhya Devi, were not present and no request for …
The appellant, Thakur Prasad, filed a first appeal against an order dated 2016 but failed to appear before the court. No request for adjournment or any other submission was made by the appellant. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal for non‑prosecution. The interim order that was in …
The applicant, Tasneem Fatima, filed a contempt petition alleging violation of a judgment dated 26.05.2023 in Writ‑A No.3795 of 2023. The opposite party, Sri Amit Mohan Mishra, submitted a compliance affidavit stating that the authority had decided not to pay the applicant's salary following an …
The applicant Bhoora @ Vimalesh and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No appearance was made on behalf of the petitioner. Consequently, the court found that the application could not be proceeded with. The judge dismissed the application …
Ajeet Verma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 954 of 2017) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The applicant failed to appear before the court to press the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The …
Vivek Kumar filed a writ petition against the Food Corporation of India. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition. Counsel for the State was present, but the petitioner’s counsel was absent. The court dismissed the petition on the ground of want of prosecution. Consequently, …
The applicant, Chander Sen Rathore, filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the applicant and no request for adjournment was made. The court noted the absence of representation and the lack of any request to postpone the hearing. Accordingly, the …
Gulshan Begam filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The applicant's counsel, Aditya Vikram Shahi, was absent and no request for adjournment was made. The High Court noted the absence of representation and the lack of any request to continue the …
The applicant, Shahajhan Khatun, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. The matter was listed before Hon’ble Justice Manish Kumar. Counsel for the applicant, Mr. Aditya Vikram Shahi, was absent and no request for …
The petitioner, Shravan Kumar Singh, filed a civil contempt application against Anoop Kumar, District Inspector of Schools, Gonda. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, but the petitioner's counsel, Saryu Prasad Tiwari, was absent and no request for adjournment was …
Shiv Ram Tiwari filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No counsel appeared for the applicant, while the Additional Government Advocate represented the State. An interim order had earlier been granted in favour of the …
Rajat Bajpai filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 5811 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was filed by a team of counsel including P.R.S. Bajpai and others, while the State was represented by C.S.C., Ganesh Kumar Gupta …
Vipin Jaiswal applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 CrPC in connection with Crime No.423 of 2024, which alleged offences under IPC sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2). He claimed he was falsely implicated, noting that co‑accused Gaurav Jaiswal and Pankaj Jaiswal had already …
The appellant Ram Pratap and others filed a second appeal before the Allahabad High Court. On the day of hearing, none of the appellant's counsel appeared, while the respondent's counsel, R.K. Srivastava, was present. The court noted the appellant's absence and, after confirming that no …
The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for prosecution. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State's counsel was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and the lack of prosecution of the petition. Consequently, …
The applicants filed a contempt application alleging that the District Inspector of Schools, Jalaun, had failed to comply with a court order dated 29 May 2019 issued in Writ Petition No.15686 of 2019 (Ashok Kumar Pandey & 12 others v. State of U.P. and others). The respondent filed an affidavit …
The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 14014 of 2017 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No petitioner appeared to press the petition before the Court. Counsel for the State was present and represented the respondents. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. …
Petitioner Smt. Meena Devi filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the Union of India and others. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the petition. Counsel for the State was present. The Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. The …
The applicant, Divya Prakash Mishra, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant failed to appear before the court on multiple scheduled dates, including the last hearing on 23 November 2022, while counsel for the State and the second opposite party were …
An application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was filed by Umapati Tripathi and others against the State of U.P. The applicant's counsel did not appear before the court, although the Additional Government Advocate was present. The court examined whether the application could be …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court under the priority case category, but failed to appear before the court. The State respondents were represented by standing counsel. Upon reviewing the record, the court found that no cause of action remained in favor of the …
The appellant, C/M Sardar Patel Smarak Inter College and others, filed a special appeal (No. 103 of 2016) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The appeal was scheduled to be heard before a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Rajan Roy and Hon'ble Justice …
The appellant, C/M Sardar Patel Smarak Inter College and another, filed a special appeal before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The appeal was listed before a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Rajan Roy and Hon'ble Justice Manjive Shukla. No counsel appeared on …
An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was listed before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant, Haseena Bano, was represented by counsel Om Prakash Misra, while the State was represented by the Government Advocate. On the scheduled date, the applicant's counsel did not …
Petitioner Deo Raj Singh filed Writ Petition (A) No. 6134 of 2001 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the District Inspector of Schools, Faizabad and two others. The petition was listed before the Bench of Hon'ble Justice Rajan Roy. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner …
Amita Tripathi filed a civil contempt application (No. 199 of 2022) alleging that the order dated 27‑10‑2021 passed by the writ court had not been complied with by the respondents, including Sri Deepak Kumar, Principal Secretary, Department of Basic Education, Government of U.P. The respondents, …
The petitioner, Const. 174 Cp Ashok Pratap Singh, filed Writ A No. 6496 of 2011 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. Counsel for the petitioner, Rajesh Singh Chauhan and Rajan Singh, were not present in court on the scheduled date. No request for adjournment was made on behalf of the …
M/S Shree Radha Raman Enterprises filed a writ petition challenging an ex‑parte demand order dated 15‑12‑2023 issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh State Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 for the assessment year 2017‑18. The petitioner contended that the order was barred by the three‑year …
The petitioner, Lajwanti Samson, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the petition. Counsel for the State was present. The Court observed that the petition could not be prosecuted due to the absence of the petitioner …
In Civil Revision No. 84 of 2019, the revisionist Bharatdwaj filed a petition against Vasdev and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and there was no request for adjournment. The court noted the absence of representation and dismissed the petition in default on 10 July 2024. The …
The petitioner, Kaneez Tahira Rizvi, filed a writ petition (Writ A No. 3002 of 2005) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging actions of the State of U.P. Through Principal Secretary Revenue and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and the matter had been …
The applicant, Madeenul Hasan, filed an application under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 529 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 before the Allahabad High Court. No representative appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while counsel for the State was present. The …
The applicants, Divya Sharma and Abhijeet Sharma, filed a bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1114 of 2025 concerning Crime No. 397 of 2024, wherein they were charged under Sections 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust. They …
Amar Kumar filed a civil contempt application (No. 1721 of 2014) against Shri Sadakant, Principal Secretary, Housing and Urban Development, Lucknow. The petitioner failed to appear in court and did not seek any adjournment. Counsel for the respondent, Nadeem Murtaza and Ratnesh Chandra, were …
A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 9274 of 2021) was filed by Hemlata Singh against the State of U.P. and others. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition, although counsel for the State was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioner and the lack of prosecution of the …
Lal Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to ensure that a non‑cognizable report (NCR) be lodged against several accused at Ikauna Police Station, based on earlier orders dated 26‑03‑2019 and 04‑05‑2019. The State responded that a charge‑sheet had …
In Contempt Application (Civil) No. 415 of 2021, the applicants Samar Bahadur Singh and another sought relief against Aradhna Shukla, Secretary Secondary Education, Lucknow, and others. The applicant's counsel, Pradeep Kumar Singh, was listed, but no one appeared in court to press the application. …
The applicant, Karuna Sadan Dixit, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 4515 of 2017) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The application was to be heard in Court No. 14 before Hon'ble Justice Prakash Singh. No …
The appellant, Verendra Singh, filed a first appeal against an order dated 2011 from the U.P.S.R.T.C. through its Regional Manager. The appeal was filed after a considerable delay, and the appellant failed to appear before the court to seek condonation of the delay. The court noted that no counsel …
The petitioners, Jiyaul Hasan and others, filed a contempt application (Civil) No. 1587 of 2020 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, alleging that the respondent, Rajpal Singh, Engineer-in-Chief, P.W.D., Lucknow, had failed to comply with a prior judgment and order. The petitioners, …
Mrs. Varuna filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition, although counsel for the State was present. The court observed that the petition could not be prosecuted in the absence …
Mohd. Shamshad filed a civil contempt petition (No. 1205 of 2020) against Shlok Kumar, Superintendent of Police, Hamirpur. The petitioner’s counsel did not appear, and no adjournment was sought. State counsel Sanjay Trivedi appeared and submitted that the order of the Writ Court had been complied …
Petitioner Govind Raj filed a writ petition (WRIT‑A No. 5469 of 2001) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, while the State of U.P. was represented by its standing counsel. The Court observed that the petition could not be pursued due …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief, but no applicant appeared before the court. The State's counsel was present. The High Court dismissed the application on the ground of want of prosecution, …
The petitioner, Govind Raj, filed Writ A No. 5351 of 2000 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against Nagar Palika Parishad Ayodhya and six others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. Consequently, the Court noted the lack of prosecution …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief in a criminal matter. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the application before the High Court. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court …
The petitioner, Pushpa Gaur, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for prosecution. The State counsel was present, while no representative appeared for the petitioner. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and dismissed the petition for want of …
The petitioner, Vidyut Parishad Ashulekhak Sangh Thoru, filed a civil contempt application (No. 429 of 2015) against Sanjay Agarwal and others. On the hearing date, no representative of the petitioner appeared, though the State's standing counsel was present. The court observed that the passage of …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared to pursue the petition, although counsel for the State was present. The Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted was vacated. The …
The petitioner, Ram Shanker Mishra, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. through the Secretary, Cooperative Societies. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the day of hearing, and the case was listed under the "cases shall not …
The petitioner, Vikash Gautam, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while counsel for the State was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and dismissed the …
The petitioner, Vijay Kumar Yadav, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while counsel for the State was present. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have been in …
Anil Kumar Srivastav filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 19304 of 2016) before the Allahabad High Court challenging orders of the State of Uttar Pradesh and its departments. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition. The counsel for the State and other respondents were present. …
A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 19772 of 2016) was filed by Lal Bahadur before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition, although counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioner and consequently dismissed …
A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 20372 of 2016) was filed by Ram Lakhan Maurya before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared to pursue the petition, while counsel for the State of U.P. was present. The Court observed the lack of prosecution and dismissed the petition. It also vacated any …
Shiv Prasad Tiwari filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 4304 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. The petition was filed through counsel Sudhakar Mishra, while the State was represented by G.A. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and …
Petitioner Chhotey Lal Jaiswal filed Writ A No. 3498 of 2011 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. through its Secretary, Basic Education Civil Section. The petition was listed but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ. The Court …
Shiv Kumari and others filed a first appeal against an order dated 2017 passed by The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. The appeal was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the High Court Rules, 1952. No party, including the appellant or the respondent, …
Rakesh Kumar Shukla filed a writ petition (No. 1476 of 2005) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging the Director of Education, U.P., and others. No counsel appeared for the petitioner and no request for adjournment was made. The court noted the absence of representation and the …
Mukesh Kumar filed a first appeal against the order dated 2023. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant to press the appeal, and no request for adjournment was made. The High Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that may have been in force was …
The applicants, Dilip Kumar Gautam and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, but the applicants failed to appear or prosecute the …
Ashok Kumar filed a civil contempt petition (No. 1880 of 2020) against Smt. Geeta Singh, President of a Co‑Operative Wholesale Society. The petition was listed for hearing without any request for adjournment. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The Court observed …
The applicant, Rajdeep Srivastava, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking continuation of interim protection that had been granted during mediation. The matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Center, which reported that no settlement was reached …
The petitioner, Dhani Ram Yadav, filed Writ Petition No. 7670 of 2014 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the date of hearing, and no request for adjournment was made. The …
The petitioner, Rakesh Bahadur Singh, filed Writ Petition No. 13243 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of U.P. The petition was listed under the ‘cases shall not be adjourned’ category. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the …
Alim Abbas filed a contempt application against Mr. Deepak Kumar and two others. The matter was listed under the heading “These matters, be not adjourned”. Neither the counsel for the applicant nor the counsel for the opposite parties appeared before the court, and no request for adjournment was …
The applicant, Mohd Israil, filed a civil contempt application against Rajendra Pratap Dios Andambedkar Nagar. The applicant failed to appear before the court to prosecute the application, although the standing counsel was present to assist. The court noted the absence of the applicant and the lack …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief. No petitioner appeared before the court to press the application, though counsel for the State was present. The High Court observed the lack of prosecution and …
Malkhan Singh filed a first appeal against Order No. 270 of 2017. The appellant failed to appear before the court and made no request for adjournment or to press the appeal. The court noted the absence of any prosecution of the appeal. Consequently, the bench dismissed the appeal for want of …
In Special Appeal No. 235 of 2014, the appellant Syed Mohammad Afsar Jah Rizvi challenged a decision of the U.P. State Bridge Corp. Ltd. The appeal was filed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant and no response was filed. Consequently, the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (WRIT‑A No. 11130 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of U.P. The petition was listed but the petitioners failed to appear before the court and made no request for adjournment. The court noted the absence of …
The applicant, Shatrughan Mishra, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief in a criminal matter. No representative appeared on behalf of the applicant, while counsel for the State was present. The Court dismissed the …
The petitioners, Smt. Seema Devi and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 2391 of 2016) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter was listed for hearing on 5 August 2024, but no counsel …
Satya Narain Singh filed a civil miscellaneous arbitration application before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf to press the application, and he made no request for a pass over or adjournment. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the application. Consequently, the …
Vishwanath Patel filed a writ petition (WRIT‑A No. 4665 of 2011) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted an illness slip, but the court had repeatedly ordered that the case should not be further adjourned. Since the petition, originally filed in 2011, …
The petition filed by the Divisional Forest Officer and another under Article 227 challenged an interim order dated 27 January 2025 that directed the petitioner to deposit back wages within three months, a deadline later extended by three weeks on 28 April 2025. The respondents contended that …
The applicant, Dinesh Chandra Sharma, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a criminal revision order dated 31.08.2024 and a civil summoning order dated 29.02.2024. The parties had earlier been directed to appear before the Mediation and Conciliation …
The petitioners, including the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Forest, Government of U.P., sought relief from the High Court under Article 227, challenging an interim order dated 27 January 2025 that required the respondents to deposit back wages. The respondents argued that the back wages …
Shardendu Shukla filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 7463 of 2004) against King George Medical University, Lucknow. The petition was listed as an oldest case but the petitioner failed to appear even after a revised call. The respondent’s counsel and the Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State …
The applicant, Basant Kumar Singh, sought cancellation of a bail order dated 22‑12‑2023 that had been granted to the opposite party No. 2 in a case under IPC sections 387, 427 and 506. The request was based on an alleged assault by the bailee on an informant, resulting in a gun‑shot injury, for …
Dr. Raj Kishore Shukla and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief in a criminal matter. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court held that in …
The appellant, Giresh Mohan Srivastava and others, filed a second appeal (Defective No. 34 of 2016) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. The appellant’s counsel, M.A. Siddiqui, was listed but no representative appeared to prosecute the appeal. The court was required to determine whether …
An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Sumit Jaiswal and others seeking relief against the State of U.P. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, but none of the applicants appeared and no request for adjournment was made. The …
The petitioners, employed as Seasonal Collection Peons by the Uttar Pradesh Department of Revenue from 2003-2004, sought regularisation of their services after their requests were repeatedly rejected. The respondents relied on a Government Order dated 29 August 2001, which purported to prohibit …
The applicant, Vinod Kumar Mishra, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief against the State. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the State’s counsel was present. The High Court observed that the …
The petitioner, Awdhesh Kumar Pandey, filed a writ petition against the U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, with counsel Pt S Chandra and N.N. Jaiswal representing him, while the respondent was represented by Sandeep Dixit and Sudeep Dixit. The bench, …
The petitioner, Shailendra Kumar, filed a writ petition (WRIT-A No. 6786 of 2006) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and the standing counsel for the respondent was the only party present. The court …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court's intervention in a criminal proceeding. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application, although the State's Government Advocate was present. The Court observed the …
Petitioners Hitesh Kumar and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 29‑08‑2025 (Crime No. 50 of 2025) alleging offences under sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 64 and 82 of the Indian Penal Code, the Dowry Prohibition Act and other statutes, and also …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but their counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had already been filed in the underlying case and therefore they did not wish to pursue the writ further. The court accepted this position and dismissed the writ …
The petitioners, Suresh Soni and others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 2748 of 2017) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the application, while the learned Additional Government …
The applicant, Uma Kant, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023, seeking relief from the trial court. No representative appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while counsel for the State was present. The High …
The applicants Sarmod and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 11905 of 2021) before the Allahabad High Court, seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application, although the …
The applicant, Smt. Pushpa Sharma, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The High Court, …
Geeta Devi @ Mansi Verma and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants, although the Additional Government Advocate was present. Counsel for one of the opposite …
Petitioner Chhote Lal filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 26126 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel, and they expressed loss of interest in pursuing the case. The respondent's counsel was present, and the Court invoked the …
Mst. Raja Beti filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the Board of Revenue. The petition was listed under the 'Oldest Pending Cases' for priority hearing. No counsel or party appeared to press the petition on the scheduled date. The Court observed that the …
Ram Autar filed a criminal appeal (No. 699 of 1987) against the State in the Allahabad High Court. The appellant died, as confirmed by a letter dated 23.04.2026 from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahr. No application was filed by the legal heirs to continue the appeal. The Court noted the …
The applicant, Foundation for Innovation and Research in Science and Technology, filed an arbitration application under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator. The opposite parties, Cybernexa Infotech Private Limited and another, consented …
The appellants Pranshu Rai and two others appealed to the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash the summoning and cognizance order dated 14-10-2025 and the entire Sessions Trial proceedings arising under several provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. …
Sunil Hitech Engineers Ltd filed an application under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve its dispute with Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. The court examined the consent of former High Court Judge O.P. Garg to act as …
The applicant, Virendra Singh, was arrested in connection with a road‑traffic accident on 30‑08‑2025 that resulted in the death of a man. The FIR, lodged on 08‑09‑2025, alleged that the applicant and co‑accused had struck the deceased's scooter with a Bolero car, causing fatal injuries. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Nitin Kumar, who is accused in a case under Section 316(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant asserted his innocence, highlighted a deposit of Rs.90,697 …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Lakhan Singh in a 2014 FIR alleging misappropriation of scholarship funds, with charges under IPC sections 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B. The applicant contended that the charge‑sheet was filed without solid …
Jitendra Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS No. 1199 of 2026) against the State of U.P. The applicant's counsel, Arunesh Datta, informed the court that the application had become infructuous and requested its dismissal. The court …
The parties entered into a franchise agreement on 28 May 2025 containing an arbitration clause in clause 17. A dispute arose and the applicant invoked the clause by notice, but the parties could not agree on an arbitrator. The applicant filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & …
The applicant, Mohd. Tahir @ Tehrir, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 465 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 109, 127(2), 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the IPC, alleging assault causing serious injury. The first bail application had been rejected. The applicant …
The petitioner, Ram Ratan, was initially engaged on a temporary basis as a Chaukidar from 1991 and later regularized in 1992, but his appointment was repeatedly treated as temporary. After a 1993 judgment allowed him to continue as a temporary employee, he was terminated on 3 December 1996 following …
The High Court of Allahabad considered the bail application filed by Rohit Tiwari @ Gore against the State of U.P. The application was heard before Justice Rajiv Lochan Shukla. No detailed facts or legal arguments were recorded in the short order. The court allowed the bail application, referring to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Jitendra Prasad, who is charged with offences under Sections 115(2), 351(2), 109, 352 of the BNS Act and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …
M/S Globle Steel filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and two others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the hearing date. The Court observed that the petition was not being prosecuted. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Arjun Kumar, who is charged under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 351(3) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly receiving Rs 13 lakh in exchange for …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 12282 of 2025) arising under Section 318(4) of the B.N.S. and Section 63 of the Copyright Act. The applicant argued that he had not been …
We use cookies for analytics to improve your experience. Essential cookies are always on. Privacy Policy.