Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 7401–7600

RAMAKANT AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 07 of 2018) for alleged rape and offences under the POCSO Act, claiming the complaint lacked a medical report and was filed out of personal enmity. The court noted that summons were issued in …

KHUB SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Khub Singh, the maternal uncle of a deceased woman, who was accused of strangulating her during a family dispute. The prosecution alleged that the deceased and her lover were confined and beaten before the alleged murder, but the post‑mortem …

SHESHMANI PATEL ALIAS DEVRAJ PATELversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sheshmani Patel, who was alleged to have driven a truck from which 500 kg of ganja was seized under the NDPS Act. The applicant argued that the mandatory provisions of …

SATYAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered bail applications filed by Satyam Yadav and Rohit Tiwari @ Gore in a case involving alleged assault at a liquor shop, where the victims suffered injuries, including a fracture to the parietal bone. The applicants claimed false implication and argued that the …

BIJENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Bijendra, who was arrested in connection with a case involving multiple offences such as assault, grievous injury and other provisions of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. …

MOHD AZAM AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mohd Azam and five others, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC challenging a notice issued by a magistrate under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The matter had earlier been referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of the …

SHIVA SINGH @ DEEPAK SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shiva Singh @ Deepak Singh, who is charged under Sections 109, 126(2), 352, 351(3), 324(4) and 191(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant claimed he was …

SUMIT KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 seeking interference with a prior order that had referred the matter to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The court noted that the applicants had failed to comply with the April 4, 2024 order to deposit money, which prevented issuance of …

MOHAN CHANDRA BALMIKI ALIAS MONUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohan Chandra Balmiki, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel expressed that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the application and requested its dismissal as not pressed. The court …

JYOTI @ SONIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jyoti @ Soni, accused in Crime No.215 of 2025 under Section 103(1) BNS for allegedly assaulting a deceased with a gaita. The prosecution’s evidence was weakened by the police’s failure to produce the forensic‑science‑lab report, colour …

OM PRAKASH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking the eviction of respondents 6‑10 who had re‑encroached on public utility land comprising plot no. 182 (recorded as Pond) and plot no. 66 (recorded as Bheeta) in Mirza Adampur, Azamgarh. The respondents had previously been ordered by the …

SUBHASHCHAND AND 3 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking interference with an interim order. The court had earlier referred the matter to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, directing the applicants to deposit money before notices could be issued. The …

LEELAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of the accused Leela, who was lodged in jail since 25‑01‑2026 for offences including sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 61(2), 109, 130, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 324(2), 110 BNS and …

HARENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Harendra, who was arrested in connection with a case involving multiple offences including assault and grievous injury to an 84‑year‑old informant. The applicant claimed …

AJEETversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ajeet, who was arrested in connection with a case involving multiple offences including assault and grievous injury. The applicant claimed innocence and pointed out that …

RAM DAYALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 27 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Dayal, filed a writ petition challenging an order passed under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The Gaon Sabha subsequently filed a restoration application against that order, which was stayed. The learned Standing Counsel informed the court of these developments. The …

BRAHMADEV AND 4 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking interference with a prior order that had referred the matter to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The court noted that the applicants had failed to comply with the April 1, 2024 order to deposit money, …

M/S AVAN ELASTOMERS INDIAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

M/s Avan Elastomers filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash a summoning order dated 11‑07‑2023 issued by the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant claimed it had returned Rs 1,81,000 before the …

DR VIVEK CHAKRAVERTIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Dr. Vivek Chakraverti filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court's inherent powers. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to argue the matter, and only counsel for the opposite party was present. The court noted the absence of any …

IZHARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the accused Izhar, who was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (including 281, 125(A), 125(b), 109, 117(2), 191(2), 191(3), …

HARISANKAR @ SONUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Harisankar (Sonu), who had been in custody since 3 February 2026 in a case (Crime No. 29 of 2026) under Sections 109(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, stating he was the informant and that his wife, …

INDRAPALversusNEERAJ GOYAL AND 6 OTHERS

Indrapal filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against Neeraj Goyal and six others. The petitioner sought relief, but the learned counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous because the matter was already decided under Order 9 Rule 9 of the CPC. The respondents' counsel …

DAYARAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dayaram, filed a writ petition seeking enforcement of an order dated 23 April 2026 that permitted him to join as a Class IV outsourcing employee. The respondent college acknowledged the order and the petitioner’s appointment. The court found that there was no substantive dispute …

ANSHULversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anshul in a rape case (Crime No.56 of 2025). The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, noting that the victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS did not allege rape or sexual assault against him, and that the primary accused Kapil had …

VINOD KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 17‑11‑2025 and the criminal proceedings in case No. 3773 of 2020 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. During the hearing the applicant withdrew his …

RAJU ALIAS RAJPALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Raju Alias Rajpal, who was arrested in connection with a violent incident involving multiple accused and injuries to an 84‑year‑old informant. The applicant claimed …

ABHAY TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhay Tiwari under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in a case registered as Crime No. 40 of 2021. The applicant argued that the FIR was vague, did not allege any act falling within the …

DEEPAK KUMAR SAHU AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants filed a criminal appeal seeking to quash a summoning order dated 14 January 2026 issued by the Special Judge under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in a case arising from alleged offences under several IPC and SC/ST Act provisions. The …

MOHD. FAROOQ AND ANOTHERversusSRI HARI KRISHNA AGARWAL AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Mohd. Farooq and another, filed an application under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve their dispute with the respondents, Sri Hari Krishna Agarwal and five others. The High Court examined the consent of …

HIMANSHU SINGHversusRASHMI SINGH

The petitioners Himanshu Singh and Rashmi Singh were married on 24‑11‑2024 but lived separately. The petitioner sought a waiver of the six‑month cooling period prescribed under Section 13‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act for filing a dissolution suit, but the Family Court rejected the waiver on …

MEERA DEVIversusRAJENDRA YADAV

The petitioner Meera Devi filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the Civil Suit No. 303 of 2014 (Mangla Yadav v. Ramkrit Yadav) pending before the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Chandauli be decided within a stipulated time. The petition alleged that the suit was pending …

GUFRANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gufran, who has been in custody since 16 January 2026 in a case under Sections 137(2), 87 and 142 of the B.N.S. The applicant alleged false implication in an alleged abduction of a victim, claiming the victim had eloped with his brother and that …

ARJUNversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered bail applications filed by Arjun and Raj Baisala Alias Raja in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 12714 of 2026, relating to Crime No. 29 of 2026. The applicants argued they were falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and had no criminal antecedents, while …

PRASHANT GAUTAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ of habeas corpus directing the State respondents to produce Smt. Neelam, the wife of petitioner No.1, and to release her from the custody of respondents No.4‑6. The court examined the age and status of Neelam, who produced a high school certificate showing a birth date …

SHER SINGH @ SHER BAHADUR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sher Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 9422 of 2022) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etah, which involved offences under Sections 420 and 120‑B of the …

SMT SUSHMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Smt Sushma filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 3034 of 2024) arising from an alleged fraud under IPC Section 420 and the Price Chits and Money Circulation Scheme Act. The applicant admitted that …

RIDIMA RAI (MINOR) AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, a minor named Ridima Rai and another individual, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been …

ISLAM AND ANOTHERversusBUDDHU SHAHI AND 10 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) of Bansgaon, Gorakhpur, to decide the pending case of Islam Vs. Buddhu Shahi (Case No. 470 of 2020) within a stipulated period. The petition sought expeditious disposal of that case. The High Court …

SANOJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sanoj, accused in a murder case (Crime No. 374 of 2025) under IPC sections 103(1), 238(Ka), 3(5) BNS and Arms Act sections 4, 25, 27, 35. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the eyewitness statements were …

RAZA KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Raza Khan was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly forcing a consensual relationship, taking obscene photographs, threatening the victim, and attempting to convert her religion, thereby insulting her caste. He filed …

SATYABHAN YADAV @ GOLUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Satyabhan Yadav, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his arrest and remand after FIR No. 1478/2025 was lodged on 24‑12‑2025. A notice under Section 35(3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sahnita (BNSS) was issued, but the petitioner was arrested on 25‑12‑2025 before the notice period …

SHAHANWAZ ALAM @ RAJAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Shahanwaz Alam, sought bail in a murder case (Crime No.101 of 2025) alleging that he was falsely implicated and that the offence should fall under Section 105 of the IPC rather than Section 103. The prosecution presented three eyewitnesses and CCTV footage showing the applicant …

DEEPAK AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad heard an application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Deepak and three others against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No party appeared to argue the application, and only counsel for one opposite party was present. The Court dismissed the application …

SASARAM NONIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sasaram Noniya, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release in a cyber‑fraud case (Case Crime No. 46 of 2025) that also involves offences under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(5), 318(4), 61(2) of the BNS Act and Section 66D …

MOOL CHANDRA PATELversusSANJAY SINGH

The petitioner, Mool Chandra Patel, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Sharki, Prayagraj, to decide and conclude the pending Original Suit No. 571 of 2021 against Sanjay Singh within the stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the …

ATUL @ AMIT YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Atul @ Amit Yadav, who was arrested in connection with a minor's alleged abduction under Sections 140(1), 115(2) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, pointing to contradictory victim statements recorded under Sections …

SMT. SUNEETA DEVIversusRAM BHAWAN YADAV AND 2 OTHERS

Smt. Suneeta Devi filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Allahabad to decide an application filed on 17‑10‑2022 under Order 39 Rule‑1 of the CPC in Original Suit No. 742/2022. The petitioner argued that the application should be decided expeditiously. The …

BIRAM SINGH AND 6 OTHERSversusMOHD ANIS AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioners, Biram Singh and others, filed a petition under Article 227 challenging the judgment and order dated 25 March 2026 passed by the Additional District Judge, Saharanpur, in Civil Misc. Appeal No. 198/2025. Their counsel, Ram Prakash, sought to withdraw the petition on the ground that …

SMT SONIYAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Smt. Soniya, filed a writ petition after the Railway Claims Tribunal, Allahabad awarded them Rs 8 lakhs as compensation for the death of the petitioner’s son in a railway accident, releasing only 10% of the amount and directing the balance to be deposited. They sought a direction …

GUDDUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Guddu filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and requested its withdrawal. The State's Additional Government Advocate did not oppose …

PAWAN JATAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Pawan Jatav, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 3‑7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and Section 99 of the B.N.S. The applicant …

SHIVAM CHATURJIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Shivam Chaturji, who was arrested in a dowry‑related case (Criminal Case No. 91 of 2026) involving alleged harassment and a 30% burn injury to the victim. The applicant claimed …

SHARWAN CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Sharwan Chauhan, who was arrested in a case under the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he was …

PAWAN YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Pawan Yadav, who was arrested in connection with Crime No.114 of 2026 involving multiple offences under the B.N.S. and the Arms Act. The applicant contended that he was …

NASEEM KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Naseem Khan, who was implicated in Crime No.50 of 2021 under the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act (sections 3, 5A, 5B, 8) and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act …

ATUL KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Atul Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 7445 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and six other respondents. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Satendra Tripathi, requested that the petition be disposed of with …

MAHENDRAPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Mahendrapal Singh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging orders dated 27.02.2025 and 03.06.2025. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that an appeal against those orders was already pending and requested permission to withdraw the writ petition, …

URMILA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Urmila Devi appealed to the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an order dated 17 April 2025 of the Special Judge that directed the police to lodge a First Information Report under Section 173(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a case filed under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes …

RAM MANOHAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 21 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ram Manohar and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner of Prayagraj district to decide a stay application pending in Revision No. 682/2026 (also referred to as Revision No. 628/2026). The petitioners alleged that …

INDRAJEETversusSHARDA PRASAD AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite parties willfully disobeyed the High Court's interim status‑quo order dated 06.02.2025 in Writ‑B No. 4448/2024. The applicant claimed that, despite the court’s direction, the opposite parties instituted a civil suit (O.S. No. 54 …

ARYAN GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aryan Gupta, who was charged under Sections 147, 352, 336, 308 and 326 of the Indian Penal Code in a case registered as Crime No.22 of 2024. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, noting that his name does not appear in the FIR and …

JAGDISH YADAVversusSMT. CHHAYA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jagdish Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate II, Gautam Buddh Nagar, to decide Misc. Case No. 2 of 2026 concerning compliance with a temporary injunction dated 19 March 2021, issued in the original suit of …

M/S COSMOS INTERNATIONALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Cosmos International, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the High Court's supervisory intervention to compel the respondent MSEFC, Meerut, to conclude arbitration proceedings (Reference No. 09/2024) and pass a final award without further adjournments. The petition also …

DIVYA YADAVversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Divya Yadav, a 26‑year‑old adult, filed a habeas corpus petition claiming she was being detained against her will and fearing for her life due to her influential father. She asserted that she had married Abhishek Yadav and wished to live with him, but was being kept under the control of her parents. …

AMAR SINGH DHANGARversusSHANTI DEVI AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Amar Singh Dhangar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Etawah to finally decide a pending declaratory suit (O.S. No. 466 of 2014) against the respondents. The petitioner argued that the suit should be expedited. The …

NEERAJ JAUHARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Neeraj Jauhari filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a 27‑April‑2026 order of the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Agra, which had issued non‑bailable warrants against the accused in State v. Pooran (Session Case No. 1921 of 2022). The applicant argued that the order should be …

SALMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Salman, who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. Salman claimed innocence, asserted that he was …

VIJENDRA NATH GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order directing the respondent to remove an alleged illegal encroachment by respondent no.4 on Plot No.127, recorded as a rasta in revenue records in Rampura Sultanpur, Bareilly. The respondent submitted a DDM instruction dated 5 May …

GEETA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Geeta Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Upziladhikari/Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Lalganj, Mirzapur, to decide an appeal (No. T202516530205562 2025) pending under Section 35(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the appeal …

URMILA DEVIversusBHANU PRATAP AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Urmila Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Shahganj, Jaunpur to decide Suit No. 1601 of 2022 (Bhanu Pratap v. Urmila and another) under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The petitioner argued that the suit should be …

KAIF KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kaif Khan, filed a writ petition seeking a compassionate appointment after his father's death. He allegedly appeared on the date fixed before the Registrar, but no evidence was produced, leading the respondents to claim he did not appear and was therefore not desirous of appointment. …

JABITA KHATOONversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Jabita Khatoon filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the lower court to expedite the pending case No. 5012/2025 (Jabita Khatoon v. Hareram) and a computerized case T202505440205012 before the Tahsildar Hata, Kushinagar. The petitioner alleged that the case has been pending …

ZEESHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Zeeshan, who was arrested on 14‑02‑2026 in connection with a case under sections 115(2), 352, 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, stating that the injured parties suffered no grievous injuries and that the FIR was …

RAJNI MISHRAversusPANKAJ RAJHANS

The appellant, Rajni Mishra, filed an appeal against a trial court order that dismissed her husband’s divorce suit filed under the Hindu Marriage Act on grounds of cruelty. She argued that the order adversely affected her because her husband had remarried during their subsistence of marriage and …

SURYAPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Suryapal Singh, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to take legal action against encroachers on Gaon Sabha land in Basti district. The respondents, including the State, argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy …

SHASHIKANT RAMADHAR PANDEYversusSMT DULRI DEVI AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shashikant Ramadhar Pandey, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No.3, Varanasi, to consider and decide Original Suit No. 1538 of 2013 (Pandey v. Dulri Devi & others) within a stipulated time. The …

SMT. SHABNAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Shabnam, filed a writ petition seeking to quash a recovery certificate dated 24.03.2026 issued under Sections 33 and 47 of the Stamp Act, and to obtain a mandamus restraining further coercive action and a stay of the recovery proceedings pending an appeal before the …

BRIJBHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Brijbhan, who was lodged in a case under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

VASID ALIAS KALAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vasid alias Kala, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 496 of 2025 under multiple sections of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was the injured party in an assault where a companion allegedly hit him, and argued that Section 109(1) …

VINAY KUMAR GOSWAMI AND 4 OTHERSversusVINOD KUMAR GOSWAMI AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No.5, Mathura, to decide Application 6‑C for a temporary injunction in Original Suit No.228 of 2012 expeditiously, preferably within eight months. The High Court noted that the suit was already pending and …

ABHIJEET SINGH @ SONUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Abhijeet Singh, who was arrested in connection with a kidnapping and ransom case (Crime No.90 of 2026) involving the abduction of the son of a complainant and a demand of …

PRAVEEN KUMAR MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Praveen Kumar Maurya, who was charged under Sections 8 and 18 of the NDPS Act for possession of 34.6 kg of poppy straw, a quantity below the commercial threshold. The …

AKASH CHAURASIYAversusSHIV KUMAR OJHA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Akash Chaurasiya, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Purvi, Ballia, to decide a 6‑C2 application filed in suit O.S. No. 376 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the application should be decided expeditiously. The High Court noted …

AKHAND PRATAP SINGHversusAAYUSHI SINGH

The petitioner, Akhand Pratap Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Jaunpur, to decide the pending divorce suit (Case No. 1101 of 2024) filed by the respondent, Aayushi Singh, under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage …

AMAN RAJPOOTversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aman Rajpoot, who was arrested in a case involving alleged assault on five persons under several sections of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had no specific role in the FIR, and had no criminal antecedents, noting …

SACHIN PATELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sachin Patel, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent court (Respondent No.2) to admit and decide his pending Second Appeal No.30 of 2011-12, which has been pending since 2012 without any order of admission. The petitioner argued that despite the death of certain …

DILEEP KUMAR PATELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 04‑11‑2022 issued in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments case. The applicant later withdrew his challenge to the warrant and only requested protection to surrender before the trial court. …

KAMRAN SHAHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Kamran Shah, who was arrested in connection with a 2019 case involving alleged counterfeiting of clothing and related offences under the IPC, Copyright Act and Trademark …

JITENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Jitendra Singh filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to remove an illegal encroachment on 0.38 hectare of land in Bansai village, Mathura. The petition alleged that the encroachment violated revenue laws and demanded …

SHESHNATH YADAV AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sheshnath Yadav, Devbrat Yadav and Ankit Yadav in Crime No. 181 of 2026, charged under Sections 103(2), 61(2), 191(2), 191(3) and 238 of the BNS, 2023 for alleged involvement in a murder‑related assault. The applicants argued that they …

SMT ROOBIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Smt. Roobi, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 469 of 2023) involving multiple IPC offences including rioting, assault, and attempt to murder, as well …

MUNNI DEVIversusUMA DEVI

The petitioner, Munni Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No.10, Deoria, to decide the pending civil suit (Original Suit No. 1606 of 2023, Uma Devi v. Munni Devi) within a stipulated period. The petitioner’s counsel urged …

LEELAWATIversusKANHAIYA AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Leelawati filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Jaunpur to dispose of her original suit No. 257 of 2010 against Kanhaiya and two others. The petition sought an order for early disposal within a period prescribed by the High …

VISHNU DATT TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Vishnu Datt Tiwari filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate of Prayagraj to decide a land revenue case (Case No. RST/6928 of 2021) that had been pending since 2021 under section 30 of the U.P. Land Revenue Code‑2006. The …

RAMVIRversusRAJENDRA KUMAR

The petitioner, Ramvir, challenged a lower‑court injunction order passed in an original suit filed by the respondents, Rajendra Kumar. The petitioner filed an application under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking to set aside or modify the injunction, and subsequently …

VINODversusBISHAN KUMAR (DECEASED) AND 3 OTHERS

Vinod filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction for the Civil Judge‑I, Bulandshahr, to decide original suit No. 489 of 2016 (Vinod v. Bishan Kumar) expeditiously. The petitioner argued that the pending suit required prompt adjudication and that the writ petition should compel the …

SMT. RASHMIversusSRI RUKAM PAL SINGH

Petitioner Smt. Rashmi filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) of Shikohabad, Firozabad, to decide a 6C‑2 application filed in Original Suit No. 308 of 2024 within a short, fixed period. The petitioner argued that the application should be decided …

ARUN KUMAR SINHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant sought quashing of the trial court's order rejecting his application under Section 528 BNSS (equivalent to Section 311 CrPC) for further cross‑examination of a child victim in a POCSO case. The High Court examined whether the power to recall a witness could be exercised when the …

SUJIT KUMARversusDEORIA SUGAR MILLS LIMITED AND 5 OTHERS

Sujit Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Court No. 10, Deoria, to decide restoration application No. 439/2020, which is pending in Misc. Suit No. 60/2020. The petitioner argued that the lower court should be compelled to decide the matter …

DINESH CHANDRA @ DINESH GUPTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dinesh Chandra, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 17‑04‑2026 passed by the Additional District Judge, F.T.C‑I, Hathras, and a mandamus to stay the proceedings in L.A. No.1/2016 pending before that judge until the disposal of First Appeal No.1163/2025 …

ARVIND KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants Arvind Kumar and two others appealed against a summoning order under Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, claiming no caste‑based abuse was alleged against them in the FIR or statements. The FIR and police statements attributed the alleged beating, caste‑based …

JAINULversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Jainul in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 16734 of 2026, relating to Crime No. 442 of 2025 under Sections 103(1), 238 of the Indian Penal Code and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicant was not named in the FIR but was mentioned as an …

AMAN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Aman Khan, who is charged in Crime No. 88 of 2025 under Sections 3, 8, 5 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Sections 4, 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

RAJEEV KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rajeev Kumar, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 66 of 2026 involving alleged violations of Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the same Act and …

AAKANSHA PALversusLAXMI SINGH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Aakansha Pal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Court No.1, Fatehpur, to decide O.S. No.639 of 2018 against Laxmi Singh and others expeditiously. The petitioner argued that the suit had been pending for an undue period …

CHUNNI LALversusPATESHVAR AND 32 OTHERS

The petitioner, Chunni Lal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gorakhpur, to decide Suit No. 1036 of 2013 (Parmeshwar & Others v. Govind & Others) within a stipulated time. The petition alleged that the suit was pending without any …

SMT SARASVATI YADAVversusMANISH KUMAR VERMA

Smt. Sarasvati Yadav filed a contempt application alleging that Manish Kumar Verma willfully disobeyed the order dated 22‑01‑2026 issued in Writ C No. 786 of 2026. The High Court noted that the earlier order of 02‑07‑2025 had been set aside, and therefore the opposite party was required to pass a …

ANAND KUMAR SAINIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anand Kumar Saini, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 18‑09‑2025 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code‑2006. The order concerned a revenue case (Case No. 11404 of 2025). The State’s Standing …

RAJPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rajpal Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the authorities to decide his representation dated 27‑04‑2026 and to enforce an order dated 30‑01‑2024, alleging that he had not been appointed as Cadre Secretary despite reaching superannuation age while similarly situated …

RAJARAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to trace and decide a pending restoration application (No. 38 of 2021) filed against an order dated 31‑10‑2019. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the restoration application remained …

SMT. RAVINA KHATOONversusMANOJ KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Ravina Khatoon, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) Gorakhpur to expedite the pending suit O.S.No.218 of 2022 (Ravina Khatoon v. Manoj Kumar & others). The sole relief claimed was that the lower court decide …

MOHAMMAD SHAMS ALAM AND 6 OTHERSversusSHAUKAT ALI AND 24 OTHERS

The petitioners, decree‑holders, filed a petition under Article 227 alleging that despite a decree in their favour, the execution of the decree in Execution Case No. 21 of 2025 (Shams Alam v. Shaukat Ali) was being unduly delayed. They pointed to a Supreme Court judgment in Civil Appeal Nos. …

RAJENDRA SINGHversusRAMDHAN AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rajendra Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Learned Additional Civil Judge, New Court, 4th Jaunpur, to expedite the pending Execution Case No. 6/2024 (Rajendra Vs. Praveen Singh). The petition solely requested that the lower court decide the …

NANHI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Nanhi Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar of Tilhar Tehsil to decide a pending mutation case (No. 8190 of 2024) that had been delayed despite several dates being fixed. The petitioner argued that the delay was unjustified and requested an expeditious …

SANNI CHAUDHARY ALIAS GOLAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sanni Chaudhary alias Gola, who had been in custody since 24 March 2026 for alleged assault under IPC sections 109, 118, 191 and a B.N.S. provision. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR did not name him, the …

MURARIversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Murari, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 7489 of 2026) challenging an action of the Union of India and four other respondents. The respondents, through counsel B.K. Singh Raghuvanshi, raised a preliminary objection that the dispute falls within the jurisdiction of the …

SHIV KUMAR MALIversusREGIONAL MANAGER RAJYA BHANDAR NIGAM LUCKNOW AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Shiv Kumar Mali, filed a writ petition seeking regularisation of his services with the U.P. State Warehousing Corporation. The respondents argued that the issue required factual determination by the competent authority and that the petitioner’s status—whether on the corporation’s …

JWALA PRASAD CHAUDHARI AND ANOTHERversusSETH PRASAD

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the Civil Judge (Junior Division) West Ballia decide Suit No.6 of 2020 (Jwala Prasad v. Setu Prasad) within a stipulated time. The petition argued that the suit was pending and required expeditious disposal. The High …

SACCHIDANAND MAURYAversusSTATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sacchidanand Maurya, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel certain respondents to remove an obstruction on a public path located on plots 133 and 134 in Banpokhara, Mau district, and to register the matter under Section 26 of the Uttar Pradesh …

PREM CHANDRA MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 25 OTHERS

The petitioner, Prem Chandra Maurya, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to enforce eviction and damage recovery orders issued by the Tehsildar of Kasimabad on 25 September 2025 and 6 March 2025 concerning public‑utility land in …

M/S SOHGAURA BROTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

M/S Sohgaura Brothers filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 30‑04‑2024 passed under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017. The petitioners argued that the order was erroneous, but the respondents contended that the petitioners had a statutory right of appeal. …

CHHOTE AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Chhote and Farokh, who were accused in Crime No. 192 of 2019 for offences under Sections 429 and 269 of the same Act, as well as Sections 3, 5, 8 of the Cow Slaughter …

SANDEEP KUMAR SINGHversusSMT. SAKSHI NIGAM

Petitioner Sandeep Kumar Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Jaunpur, to decide his matrimonial case (No. 901 of 2025) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner urged that the case be decided …

NADEEMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Nadeem, who was arrested in a case under the Cow Slaughter Act (Sections 3, 5, 8) and BNS (Section 3(5)). The applicant claimed innocence, stating that his name appeared only in …

PRATEEK PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Prateek Pandey filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a revenue authority, to register and decide a pending case under sections 34 and 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, dated 14 January 2026. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates …

RAMCHANDRAversusPARASHURAM AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ramchandra, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ballia, to decide a restoration application (No. 01 of 2019) filed in Original Suit No. 91 of 2009. The petition alleged that the civil judge had not yet ruled on the …

UPENDRA SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad heard an application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Upendra Singh and others. No counsel appeared to press the application, although counsel for one opposite party was present. The Court dismissed the application for want of …

MUNINDRA ALIAS GUDDU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants, brother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law of the informant, were charged under Section 14‑A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged caste‑based harassment, dowry demands and assault. The FIR placed the alleged offences in a village in …

SUJEET @ LALUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sujeet @ Lalu, accused of murder, causing disappearance of evidence and common intention under IPC sections 302, 201 and 34. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged late, the eyewitness statement was omitted, and the police allegedly planted …

SHAHI KHAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSHUBHAM SINGHAL AND ANOTHER

The petitioners Shahi Khan and others filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge Senior Division, Rampur, to decide the stay application in Original Suit No. 39 of 2026 as early as possible. The petition sought expeditious disposal of the stay application and …

MANOJ PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Manoj Pandey filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act, 2023, seeking to quash a Sessions Judge’s order that upheld a District Magistrate’s dismissal of his release application. The High Court heard arguments, after which the applicant’s counsel indicated that he no longer wished to …

SHRI MOHD HAFIJversusSARFARAZ AHMAD AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohd Hafij, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Chandauli to decide a pending review application (No. M-52 of 2024) in case 468/1995. The petitioner’s counsel requested an expeditious decision. The Court observed that since the …

ASHOK TIWARIversusSANTOSH KUMAR KESHARI AND 8 OTHERS

Petitioner Ashok Tiwari filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the 6c application filed in his civil suit (No. 1589 of 2024) be decided promptly. The petition was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, with counsel Ashish Srivastava representing the …

RAJUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Raju, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false implication, had …

MANOJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Manoj Kumar, the husband of a murder victim, applied for bail in a trial concerning the killing of his wife and her daughter. The prosecution alleged that six persons, including the accused, shot the deceased, while the applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and was not present at the scene. …

ARSLANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Arslan was arrested in connection with a case involving a 95% burnt body discovered on 17 December 2025, where the FIR initially named unknown persons. During investigation, a co-accused, Ehtasham, implicated Arslan in a confessional statement, but no other incriminating material was …

MANOJ KUMAR SINGH AND 13 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, a group of thirteen applicants, filed a writ petition seeking a judicial order to relax the age limit for a recruitment advertised on 04‑09‑2025. They argued that the age restriction barred them from participating and requested the court to issue a mandamus directing the authorities …

AJAY AGRAWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ajay Agrawal, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash a summoning order dated 18‑10‑2023 and a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 26‑02‑2026 issued by the Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) in Mathura, as well as the criminal proceedings under Section 138 of …

RAMAADHAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ramaadhar Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to pay his pending gratuity, pension, leave encashment, bonus, dearness allowance and other accrued benefits, along with interest. The petitioner alleged that despite repeated …

ABHIMANYU VERMAversusSURESH MISHRA

The applicant, Abhimanyu Verma, filed a contempt application alleging willful disobedience of an order dated 16 March 2022 passed in Writ B No. 483 of 2022. The application was filed 950 days after the alleged contempt, far beyond the one‑year period prescribed by Section 20 of the Contempt of …

MOHAMMAD RASHIDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Mohammad Rashid filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Up‑Ziladhikari of Sagadi, District Azamgarh (Respondent No.3) to decide case No. 8429/2026 (Shivanand et al. v. Imtiyaz et al.) pending under section 38(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The …

NEKI RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, a former pump operator who retired on 31 July 2024, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondent department to release his pending retiral dues, including pension arrears, gratuity, leave encashment, insurance, and dearness allowance with interest, and to decide …

SUNIL DASversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 13 OTHERS

Sunil Das filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the removal of an illegal encroachment on a public pathway (Arazi No. 487) in Deoria district. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, contended that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under …

SHATRUGHAN MAURYAversusCHANDAN AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shatrughan Maurya, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jaunpur, to decide a 6C application filed on 15 May 2024 in Original Suit No. 328 of 2024. The High Court had earlier, on 6 February 2025, ordered the lower court to decide …

PRADEEP AND 4 OTHERSversusASHOK KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.)‑18, Deoria, to decide an application filed under Order 39 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code in Original Suit No. 85 of 2023 (Ashok v. Pradeep). The petition argued that the suit was pending and …

RAM EKAM AND ANOTHERversusRAJ KISHOR

The petitioners, Ram Ekam and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the learned Civil Judge (S.D.) of Court No.10, Deoria, to decide Original Suit No. 1282 of 2017 against Raj Kishor within a stipulated time. The petition alleged that the suit was pending without …

BHADRA PAL SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Bhadra Pal Singh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the Union of India and three other respondents. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The respondents did not oppose this …

SUSHIL KUMAR SHUKLA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an interim stay order dated 7 December 2023 issued by the Board of Revenue, Lucknow, which maintained the status quo in a land dispute. They sought certiorari to quash the interim order, mandamus to dismiss the pending revision as barred by …

SARITA SINGHversusDURGAWATI DEVI (SINCE DECEASED) AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sarita Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Varanasi to expedite the pending Suit No. 630 of 2020, which has been in litigation since the year 2000. The petitioner argued that the suit required an …

MD. TASNEEM REZAversusALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Md. Tasneem Reza, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) to decide his representation and allow him to appear for Ph.D. admission in Mechanical Engineering for the 2025-26 session. The university required clearance from the Office of the …

KAMRANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Kamran, who was charged under Section 109(1) of the same Act and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that no police officer was …

JAMEEL AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Jameel Ahmad, who was arrested in a NDPS case (Crime No. 186 of 2026) for alleged possession of 514 g of charas, a quantity below the commercial threshold. The applicant …

M/S KRISHNA UDYOGversusCENTRAL ORGANIZATION FOR RAILWAY ELECTRIFICATION

M/S Krishna Udyog filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the executing court to expedite Execution Case No. 59 of 2020 within three months, citing a similar order the High Court had earlier passed in Matter U/A 227 No. 2660/2026. The petitioner argued that the same relief should …

DURGA WATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Durga Wati, filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking an order that the pending family‑court case (Case No. 115 of 2026) be disposed of expeditiously. The trial case involved a claim under Section 125(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 144(3) of the …

NAVEDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Naved, who was arrested in a case under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 350 grams of cannabis. The applicant argued that he was falsely …

MOHD SHAMIMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Mohd Shamim, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 109(1) and 61(2) of the same Act, the Arms Act and the Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant claimed …

AMRESH YADAV AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, comprising a husband and his in‑laws, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a domestic‑violence complaint (Case No. 878 of 2023) filed by the wife. The wife had left the matrimonial home after a dispute and initiated criminal proceedings under Section 12 …

MUKESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Mukesh, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2(Kha)(1) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …

SITARAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Sitaram filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant issued by the Special Judge, Mathura, in a case under Sections 8 and 20 of the N.D.P.S. Act. The warrant had already been executed, resulting in the …

SHABNAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Shabnam, who was arrested in a Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) case (Crime No. 457 of 2025) for alleged possession of 115 g of alprazolam powder. The …

SHRI KRISHNA JANAMSTHAN SEWA SANSTHANversusPOORAN SINGH RAGHAV AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shri Krishna Janamsthan Sewa Sansthan, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge, Essential Commodities Act Court No. 10, Mathura, to expedite the disposal of pending restoration applications (Nos. 122 of 2025 and 324 of 2024) and a …

VISHAL @ TIGER GAUTAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vishal Gautam and two others who were arrested in connection with a case involving alleged theft of a generator set, an attempt to fire on an informant causing a …

DEEPAK MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Deepak Mishra, filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash a summons issued by the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The applicant argued that the dispute was essentially a money claim and could be settled by compounding, …

B. AGRAWAL STONE PRODUCTS LTDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

B. Agrawal Stone Products Ltd filed a writ petition seeking interest on a refund paid under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008, having made representations to the Assessing Officer on several dates in 2025‑2026. The Court observed that the substantive decision on the claim rests with …

DEEPAKversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak, who was arrested in connection with a crime under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(2), (3), (5) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that his role was limited to restraining the injured Jiledar, while the …

FATEH BAHADURversusARUN KUMAR GIRI, SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE AND 11 OTHERS

The applicant alleged that the status quo order issued in Second Appeal No. 640 of 2004 was violated by the opposite party. The question before the court was whether a contempt petition under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 was the appropriate remedy. The court noted that the …

VINOD KUMARversusRAMESH MISHRA AND 5 OTHERS

Vinod Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), 7th District Jaunpur to decide Original Suit No. 242/2024 and a pending C‑application that have been pending since 28‑02‑2024. The petitioner requested that the lower court …

RAMESH PASWANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ramesh Paswan, who was in custody for offences under Sections 109, 352, 351(3) of the same Act and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence and …

VIKRANT ALIAS BITTUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Vikrant alias Bittu, sought bail in a case involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He was not named in the FIR and the first statement of the injured witness made no allegation against him; his name appeared only in a later statement recorded after a month, raising …

OMKAR NATH TIWARIversusAVANISH TIWARI AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Omkar Nath Tiwari, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.), City, Jaunpur, to decide a 6-C application filed in Original Suit No. 463 of 2025 against the respondents. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the pending suit be decided …

DAYA SHANKAR DUBEYversusKRISHNA MOHAN TIWARI AND 8 OTHERS

Petitioner Daya Shankar Dubey filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No.10, Deoria to decide the pending civil suit (Case No. 78 of 2020) against him within the stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the lower court had delayed the …

DINESH KUMARversusSMT. REKHA

Petitioner Dinesh Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction for the Family Court in Saharanpur to decide his pending case (No. 23/2019) against Smt. Rekha expeditiously. The petitioner argued that the delay in the family court case warranted higher court intervention. The …

KAMLESH KUMAR SHRIWASTVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The husband, Kamlesh Kumar Shriwastva, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash an ex‑parte order dated 27‑08‑2025 passed by the Civil Judge (J.D.)/F.T.C. in a domestic‑violence case (Swati Srivastava v. Kamlesh Kumar Shriwastva). The order had granted the wife interim …

VINAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Vinay Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Allahabad, to decide the pending Claim Petition No. 725 of 2014 within a reasonable time. The petitioner argued that the claim had been pending for an undue period and required expeditious …

VIJAYPAL SINGHversusHARPAL SINGH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Vijaypal Singh filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court, seeking relief against respondents Harpal Singh and others. The petition was presented before Hon'ble Justice Vikas Budhwar. Counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Usha Kiran, requested to …

SALMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Salma, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

AJAY MADDHESHIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Ajay Maddheshiya, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87, 61(2), 143(4) of the same Act and Sections 9 and 10 of the POCSO Act. He claimed innocence, alleging false …

TETARI DEVIversusSMT. SANKESA DEVI AND 6 OTHERS

Tetari Devi filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the IInd‑Additional Civil Judge, Junior Division, Kasia, to decide Miscellaneous Case No.217 of 2020, which arises from Original Suit No.174 of 2002 and is pending under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC. The petitioner argued that …

ABHINAYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhinay, who was implicated in Crime No.143 of 2026 under several IPC sections, though his name was not originally in the FIR and no specific role or weapon was linked to him. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated and had no …

M/S MARGO IMPEX PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, M/s Margo Impex Private Limited and another, sought to file an appeal against an Order‑in‑Original passed under the Customs Act, 1962, and requested that the respondent (the Customs Commissionerate, Noida) decide a waiver application pending before it. The issue was whether a …

SUDHIR KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Sudhir Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate, Meerut, to decide a recall application dated 22 September 2025. The petitioner argued that the application had been pending since 2025 despite several dates being fixed. The Court, …

KHARPATTUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the State of U.P. and others to construct a road over Plot No. 473 (chakmarg) as per the Gaon Sabha's proposal. The petitioner alleged that encroachments on the plot prevented the soil work required for the road. The Gram …

IMRAN AHMADversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Imran Ahmad, filed a writ petition seeking to appeal an adjudication order passed under the Customs Act, 1962, and to obtain a direction for the respondent to decide his waiver application pending before the Commissioner (Appeals). The Court noted that a similar matter, Runway Impex …

MOAZZEM ALIversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Moazzem Ali, filed a writ petition seeking to appeal an adjudication order passed under the Customs Act, 1962, and also requested that the revenue authority decide his waiver application pending before the Commissioner (Appeals). The Court noted that a similar matter, Runway Impex & …

JOGENDER PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jogender Prasad, filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 16‑04‑2026 issued by the Joint Director of Education, Gorakhpur, which summoned him to appear on 30‑04‑2026. The petitioner argued that the authority had no jurisdiction to issue such a notice and that the petition …

GAURI SHANKAR AND ANOTHERversusBHAGIRATHI AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Shahar, Jaunpur to expedite the proceedings of Original Suit No.22 of 2025 (Bhagirathi & others v. Gaurishankar) and to decide a temporary injunction application filed on 07.01.2025. The …

PREMCHAND @ PREMversusUMARAO AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Premchand @ Prem, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Saidpur, Ghazipur, to decide the pending suit No. 583 of 2016 against the respondents. The petition alleged that the suit concerning a registered sale deed of land in …

RAJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Prayagraj, to decide Appeal No. 2484 of 2024 (Bahadur Ram Bahadur v. Moti Lal & others) pending under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the appeal …

AJAY SONIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Ajay Soni, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS (2023) seeking to quash the proceedings of Special Case No. 152 of 2026, which arose from Crime No. 463 of 2025 under Sections 74, 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The application was intended to …

NARESH NISHADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Naresh Nishad, who is charged under Sections 302 and 504 IPC for allegedly scuffling with and threatening to kill the deceased, whose body was later found. The applicant argued that there is no eye‑witness, no weapon recovered, and that …