Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 7601–7800
The petitioner, Balram Ji Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Prayagraj, to decide Suit No.324 of 2004 (Ram Ji Gupta v. Shankar Lal Gupta and others) which has been pending since April 2004. The petitioner’s counsel requested an …
The petitioner, Zahid Ahmed, challenged an injunction restraining him from creating third‑party rights over a property that was the subject of a sale deed executed on 23‑03‑2024. The sale consideration was Rs.6 lakh, but a cheque issued by the petitioner was dishonoured and he alleges he has already …
The petitioner, Dr. Surabhi Srivastava, a Subordinate Gazetted Teacher, filed a writ petition seeking fixation of her seniority after being promoted on 26 October 2017 and joining the post on 25 August 2018. The petitioner argued that her seniority had not been fixed, which could impede future …
The petitioner, Sayda Khatoon alias Shahida, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Kasya, Kushinagar, to decide an application filed in O.S. No. 606 of 2025 against N.W. Future India Developer Pvt Ltd. The petitioner argued that the pending …
The applicant, Arvaj @ Hassan, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the Special Case No. 1718 of 2025, which arose from Crime No. 136 of 2025 involving alleged offences under Sections 75(2) and 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The application …
The applicant, Sunmil Alias Sonu, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 3667 of 2025) arising from alleged offences under Sections 74, 333 of the BNSS and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act in Aligarh. The application was …
Ramnaresh Tripathi filed a PIL seeking a court order directing certain respondents to remove illegal encroachments on Plot No. 326, recorded as a nala in the revenue records of Gadola Bangar, Banda district. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy …
The petitioner, Panchu, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the State of U.P. to remove illegal encroachments on three plots recorded as Banjar and Rasta in the revenue records of Village Aurahawa, Siddharth Nagar. The revenue authorities had earlier passed orders under Section …
Arvind Kumar, a Junior Engineer of U.P. Power Corporation Ltd., was penalised by reduction of his basic pay through an order dated 17-04-2023. He filed an appeal under Regulation 11 of the corporation's Discipline and Appeal Regulations, 2020, which remains pending before the Board of Directors. The …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the revenue officials (Respondent Nos. 4 and 5) not to dispossess them of the disputed land and to restrain any coercive action while a revision case (REC/1804/2019) is pending before the Board of Revenue. They also asked the court …
Petitioner Raj Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) IInd Agra Division to decide Appeal No. 218 of 2026, filed under section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, on the ground that the appeal was pending with several dates fixed but no decision …
Moti Lal filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the Uttar Pradesh revenue authorities to implement an order dated 17 July 2025 under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which directed eviction of encroachers from public land. The petitioner argued that despite …
The High Court of Allahabad heard an application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Pramod Kumar and others. No counsel appeared to prosecute the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The interim order that had been granted …
The applicant Jagdish filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel or party appeared before the court to argue or press the application. The court noted the absence of any prosecution of the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the …
The applicant, Nazim Tyagi, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court's inherent powers. No counsel or parties appeared before the court to argue the application. Consequently, the court noted the absence of prosecution and dismissed the …
The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash a criminal complaint (Case No.20290 of 2021) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The complainant, who is the husband’s wife, had settled the dispute …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Haseen @ Iddu, who was arrested in an NDPS case (Sections 8, 20, 29) for allegedly possessing 5.081 kg of charas. The applicant claimed innocence and argued that the …
The applicants, Dhrambir and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Crime No. 0290 of 2023) filed under Sections 420, 120B, 452, 504 and 506 IPC. During hearing, the applicants indicated they did not wish to contest the merits and only …
Raju Alias Shahjad Ilahi filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the order dated 03.02.2024 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffar Nagar, which had dismissed his discharge application in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. …
The applicants, Smt. Mithlesh Kashyap and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, but later indicated through their counsel that they wished to withdraw the application. The opposite party alleged that the applicants had concealed material facts …
Vijay Pal Singh filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to compel the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) of Rampur and other respondents to release his sanctioned medical reimbursement and to ensure future claims are processed per the U.P. Government Servants (Medical Attendance) Rules, 2011. The petitioner …
Petitioner Ved Prakash Pathak filed a PIL alleging that respondents 5, 6 and 7 had encroached upon Plot No.336, recorded as a pond, in Village Pariyat, Jaunpur. An eviction order dated 10.03.2025 issued by the Tehsildar had not been executed, prompting the petition. The Court directed the …
A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 20613 of 2025) was filed by Suresh Dixit and eleven others against the State of U.P. and three others. The petitioners sought relief, and mediation between the parties was attempted but failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 312 of 2025) arising from a FIR containing offences under Sections 147, 308, 427, 506, 323, 336 and 498‑A IPC. A compromise deed dated 26‑08‑2025 was filed and verified by …
The petitioner, Jitendra Singh, filed a writ petition (Writ Tax No. 1589 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner during the hearing. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to preserve plots 378 and 380, recorded as Banjar, and to evict private allottees occupying them. The respondents argued that two orders under Section 123(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, …
The applicants, two juveniles, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 08‑07‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 62 of 2024, which was pending before the Juvenile Justice Board. The charge sheet arose from offences under Sections 147, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking relief. The matter had earlier been referred to a Mediation Centre, where the applicants were required to deposit Rs.25,000 but failed to do so, resulting in no notice being issued to the second opposite party. Despite …
The appellant sought to quash a order of the Special Judge that rejected his application under Section 173(4) of the B.N.S.S. (formerly Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C.) for police investigation of alleged assault and caste‑based abuse. The High Court examined the scope of a magistrate’s discretion …
The applicant, Bhagwan Das Barar, filed a contempt application against Madhup Dwivedi, a senior official of IOCL, alleging non‑compliance with a prior writ order dated 11 May 2026. The respondent appeared before the court and submitted an affidavit stating that the representation filed by the …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. to restore a road constructed in 2011-12 on plot no.295 under the MGNREGA scheme, which had been removed by a subsequent Gram Pradhan. The respondents contended that the plot is bhumidhari (private) land …
The petitioners filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction for the removal of alleged encroachments on plot no. 2187 (recorded as Chak Road) and plot no. 2185 (recorded as Nali) in Jaunpur district. The State respondents submitted an instruction dated 7 January 2026 stating that a …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachments on several revenue‑recorded plots in Village Sultanpur, Dadri Tehsil. The court noted that the Tehsildar had already initiated proceedings under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachments on three parcels of land in Village Sultanpur, Noida Authority area. The court examined an instruction from the Tehsildar indicating that, under the amendment to sub‑section 6 of Section 59 of …
Jitendra Kumar filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the order dated 04.11.2024 of the Sessions Judge, Chandauli, which had affirmed the dismissal of his release application. The applicant's counsel initially argued the matter but later decided not …
The petitioner, Kshetrapal, filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order directing the removal of alleged illegal encroachments on plot no. 218, recorded as Chak Road, in Village Sultat Patti, Mathura. The respondents, including the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Gaon Sabha, submitted an …
Vijay Pal filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to remove an alleged illegal encroachment by respondents 5‑7 on Plot No.601, recorded as Banjar land in Ghaziabad district. The Court examined instructions from the Deputy District Magistrate …
The appellants filed a criminal appeal seeking to quash the summoning and cognizance order dated 08-08-2025 and the entire proceedings of Sessions Case No. 1455 of 2025, which arose from Crime No. 124 of 2025 under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachment on Plot No. 658 (0.045 ha) in Village Jaupur, Jaunpur. The court noted an instruction dated 12‑02‑2026 from the Deputy District Magistrate ordering eviction, and observed that earlier cases …
The applicant, Altamas Khan, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in connection with a protest case where the FIR named 25 persons and 1,700 unnamed co‑accused. He contends that he is not named in the FIR, has no specific role, and has been falsely implicated, …
The petitioner, Akram Khan, filed a writ petition seeking protection for his daughter, a minor born on 10 July 2009, who alleged that her father forced her to marry against her will and that she feared for her life. The prosecutrix, a matriculate, testified before a Judicial Magistrate that she …
In a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court, the appellant Brijesh Kumar Yadav, through counsel Upendra Kumar Tiwari, sought to withdraw the revision on the ground of changed circumstances. No counsel appeared for the second opposite party. The State of Uttar Pradesh and its counsel were …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu, who had been in custody since 6 February 2025 in connection with Crime No.30 of 2025 under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 117(3) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the alleged injury to the victim was not …
The petitioners, Pramod Kumar and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, while the State was represented by learned AGA‑I. The High Court observed that the …
The petitioner, Smt. Saroj, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the Settlement Officer (respondent No.2) to decide Appeal No.525/1090/0801 of 2025 filed under Section 11(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953. The appeal had been pending …
The applicants, a husband and his in‑laws, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS (inherent jurisdiction) seeking to quash the order dated 08‑01‑2025 and the subsequent proceedings under Sections 12, 18, 19 and 22 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, issued by the …
The revisionist filed a criminal revision 955 days after the original order, seeking condonation of delay. The court examined the affidavit supporting the delay and found the reasons insufficient. Consequently, the application for condoning the delay was dismissed. On the basis of this dismissal, …
The Allahabad High Court entertained bail application No. 37510 of 2025 filed by Suraj Kumar under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with offences under Sections 123, 309(4), 61(2) of the same Act and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act. The …
The revisionist Rinki filed a petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which led a Civil Judge to order Rs 2,000 as rent and Rs 2,500 as monthly maintenance on 27‑Oct‑2023. Rinki appealed (Appeal 147/2023) seeking higher amounts, while the opposite party Prasun …
The revisionist, Hariom Sharma, filed a criminal revision (No. 5823 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. The revisionist failed to appear when the matter was listed on 03.06.2025, and again failed to appear on the subsequent date. …
The appellant, Saurabh Gupta, appealed after a mutual consent divorce under Section 13‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, wherein a settlement required him to pay Rs.90 lakhs to the respondent, Shalini Rai. During mediation, a demand draft of Rs.45 lakhs (No. 411770 dated 04‑04‑2025) was issued by …
The appellant sought to quash a order of the Special Judge that rejected his application under Section 173(4) of the BNSS (formerly Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C.) alleging assault and caste-based abuse by the second respondent, a doctor. The High Court examined the scope of a magistrate's power …
The applicant Satyabhan filed Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 39004 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court, seeking release from custody in a case instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The applicant was represented by counsel Ajay Kumar Pal, Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, Narendra Pal Singh …
The revisionist, Smt. Jyoti Srivastava, challenged an order dated 17‑09‑2025 of the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court No.2, Varanasi, which directed her husband to pay Rs.4,000 per month as maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. She contended that the trial court erred by not granting …
The applicant, Khadak Singh, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 140 of 2024) alleging offences under several IPC sections, the B.N.S Act and the POCSO Act. The Special Judge (POCSO) had already concluded the trial and delivered a conviction on 30 September 2025. The State's brief …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 3261 of 2017) relating to offences under Sections 147, 354, 354A, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, a compromise was recorded and …
Jitendra Prasad Shukla filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court against Sub‑Divisional Magistrate Vipin Kumar Dwivedi, alleging failure to comply with a writ order dated 03‑02‑2026. The learned Standing Counsel, Shri Pawan Kumar, submitted an affidavit of compliance along with …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Jitan alias Jeetan, who was charged under Sections 109(1), 352 BNS of the same Act and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act for allegedly assaulting Ritik Gupta with a sharp‑edged …
M/s Sun Construction‑Basti, through its proprietor Sanjay Singh, filed an arbitration application under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration Act. The applicant’s counsel, Ajay Kumar Singh and Tejas Singh, subsequently moved that the application be dismissed as withdrawn. The respondents, Union of India …
Laldhar Yadav, accused under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC for murder, applied for bail after being in custody since November 2022. The first bail application was rejected on the ground that he was the main accused. The applicant argued that most prosecution witnesses had already been examined and …
Petitioner Smt Sonika Singh filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petitioner, through counsel Ajay Kumar Chaurasia, sought to have the petition dismissed as withdrawn, requesting liberty to file a fresh …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation alleging that Plot No. 735, recorded as a Johad (pond) in revenue records, had been illegally encroached upon by respondents 6 to 9. The respondents contended that no encroachment existed and that the petition was based on incorrect facts. The Court …
The petitioner, Chhatrapal, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to remove encroachments on public pond and Usar land (plots 406 and 407) in Village Karmon, Fatehpur district. The Court examined the instructions from …
The applicant, Shobhnath, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 239 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 352, 351(3), 64(2)(M) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5J(II)/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant’s counsel argued that the trial court had already acquitted the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 140001 of 2023) that were based on a compromise in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 406 and 379 IPC. The High Court noted that the parties had been directed to appear …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing certain respondents to remove illegal encroachments on a 0.3080 hectare graveyard (Kabristan) land in Narai village, Prayagraj. The State respondents produced an instruction dated 17-12-2025 indicating that the …
The petitioners, represented by Ajai Kumar and Ravindra Pratap Singh, filed a PIL seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to remove illegal encroachments on Plot No. 436, recorded as Chak Road in Village Bairiparwan, District Bhadohi. The respondents raised a …
Smt. Jyoti Shishodiya filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 1027 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit to another court. The application was listed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Rules of the Court. The court observed that the applicant's counsel had not taken the …
Parmai Lal was arrested on charges of fondling his niece under Sections 5(m)(n) and 6 of the POCSO Act, with the FIR filed 19 hours after the alleged incident and no medical evidence to corroborate the claim. The applicant, who had no prior criminal record, had been in custody for about seven months …
Ghanshyam Kunwar filed a PIL seeking a mandamus directing authorities to remove encroachments on two plots recorded as a manure pit and a khalihan in Kaushambi district. The Court noted that a earlier writ petition (Writ B No.10874 of 1997) concerning a different plot was pending, but the plots in …
Ram Pravesh Yadav filed a PIL seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to remove an alleged illegal encroachment by private respondents on Plot No. 1661G (Bhita) in Village Adri, District Mau. The revenue authority had issued instructions showing that the plot is …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a criminal case (State v. Varis and others) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise dated …
The applicant, Bhanu alias Manu alias Rishabh Chaurasiya, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings, charge‑sheet and cognizance order in Crime No. 0132 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 498‑A, 354, 323, 504, 506, 376 of the IPC and …
The petitioner, Prem Chandra Patel, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the State and other respondents to vacate an alleged illegal encroachment on Gram Sabha land (Arazi No. 531) in Prayagraj. The Court examined an instruction from the Deputy District Magistrate …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the removal of alleged illegal encroachments on two revenue plots, one recorded as a pond (Plot 36) and the other as Navin Parti (Plot 25). The court examined instructions from the Deputy District Magistrate and …
The petitioner, Sibbu Ram, filed a public interest litigation seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to remove an alleged encroachment on plot Khasra/Gatta No. 268 ख belonging to Navin Parti. The petitioner alleged that respondents No. 6 and 7, owners of the adjacent plot No. 270, had …
Shivanjali Nirvan filed a civil contempt application against Dr. Fr Joseph and another party, alleging non-compliance with a writ court order. The applicant's counsel, Ramesh Chandra Dwivedi, submitted that the writ court order had been fully complied with. The court examined whether the alleged …
The petitioner, Chhotelal Patel, filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove alleged illegal encroachments and halt construction of a pathway on plot no.287 (recorded as Khalihan) in Gaunariya Raja village, Maharajganj. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad heard bail application No. 45444 of 2025 filed by Mukesh Tiwari @ Dev Kumar against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The applicant’s counsel, Rajesh Kumar Yadav, informed the court that the applicant no longer wishes to pursue the bail relief. The court noted …
The appellant Priya (also known as Pinki and Banta) was charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for the murder of a six‑year‑old girl, based on a charge‑sheet that implicated her only during investigation, not in the FIR. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence such as …
The appellant, Samiruddin, appealed under Section 14-A(1) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act seeking to quash a summoning order and the proceedings arising from a FIR that alleged offences including criminal intimidation (Section 351(3) BNS) and a scheduled caste/tribe offence (Section …
Smt Anshima Khan filed a transfer application under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Court Rules seeking to have the suit transferred. The High Court observed that the applicant’s counsel had not complied with the procedural steps required for such an application. No substantive merits of the transfer …
Petitioner Vijay Singh filed Writ Petition (A) No. 7661 of 2012 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of U.P. through the Principal Secretary, Basic Education Department, Lucknow. The petition was listed before Hon'ble Justice Rakesh Srivastava. No counsel …
Petitioner Om Prakash Chaurasiya filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No petitioner appeared to pursue the petition, and only the State's counsel was present. The Court observed that the petition was not being prosecuted. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief. No applicant appeared before the court to pursue the application, although counsel for the State was present. The court dismissed the application for want of …
The applicant, Deepak Arora @ Devendra Singh Arora, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the matter had become infructuous and the applicant …
The petitioner, Ramendra Singh, a co‑owner of a property, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 27‑Oct‑2025 that allowed an appeal before the development authority and remanded the matter. The petitioner also has a pending partition suit against the respondents (Nos. 3‑9) and an …
The appellants Shankar and Buddha filed a criminal appeal against their conviction in a Sessions Trial. No counsel appeared for the appellants before the High Court. The court noted that the appeal concerning Shankar was already abated by an order dated 18‑12‑2025. A report from the Chief Judicial …
The revisionist, Gaurav Kumar Yadav, challenged a Family Court order under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. that directed him to pay Rs.5,000 per month to his wife and Rs.7,000 per month to his daughter. He contended that his income was limited to Rs.14,000 per month after resigning from a bank job and …
The appellant, Nadem Mian, filed a criminal appeal under Section 380 of the B.N.S.S.S. challenging an order dated 14‑11‑2025 of the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court No.2, Bareilly, which had dismissed an application filed under Section 379 read with Section 215 of the B.N.S.S.S. The …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Wasim in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 8560 of 2026, relating to a 2013 case (Cr. No. 515 of 2013) with charges under IPC sections 364, 394, 302, 201 and 411. The applicant was not originally named in the FIR but later appeared in …
Muzammil Khan appealed a Family Court order that directed him to pay monthly maintenance of Rs 12,000 to his wife Rubi Begam and Rs 8,000 each to their daughter and son under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The trial court had found that the husband had sufficient income and assets and …
The appellant, Kanhaiya Lal Sharma, filed a criminal appeal (No. 1576 of 2013) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and another respondent. The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Saharanpur reported on 3 June 2025 that the appellant had died on 19 October 2023. Upon receiving this …
Chiranjiv Prasad appealed a Family Court maintenance order directing him to pay Rs 10,000 per month to his wife (opposite party no.3) from July 2019 to February 2024. The wife had left the marital home in 2018, later obtained a government teaching job in February 2024, and the husband argued that …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, owns three agricultural plots in Village Kudwa, Kanpur Nagar, and alleges that the State of Uttar Pradesh and other authorities are constructing and extending the Damar Asphalt Road over his land without acquiring it or paying compensation under the Right to Fair …
Rinku was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 172 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 137(2), 87 and 64(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming the alleged victim was a consenting party and that her age had been …
The applicant, Ashutosh Thakur, was arrested in connection with a loan fraud case (Crime No. 988 of 2018) alleging forged documents and money transfers, though he was not named in the FIR. He sought bail, claiming no criminal history, no direct involvement, and that he had already returned the …
Anas applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 30 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 74, 64(1), 123(2) of the BNS and Sections 7, 8, 3, 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the three victims, aged between 16 and 18, were consenting parties who accompanied him on …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ritik Kumar in a criminal case (Crime No. 37 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 105, 351(3), 191(2) and 3(5) of the IPC. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was falsely implicated, and that the FIR was lodged …
The petitioner, Kamlapati Dixit, filed a writ petition (Writ C No. 17909 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner later filed a supplementary affidavit expressing the desire to withdraw the petition and seek liberty to file a fresh petition. Counsel for the petitioner, Sangeeta …
Petitioner Nagendra Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner, through his counsel, expressed that he no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The State, represented by the Additional Government …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking compliance of an injunction order issued by a trial court under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, alleging that the order had not been implemented. The respondent's standing counsel raised a preliminary objection, contending that such orders are …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Srawan Kumar Singh in a case under IPC sections 65(2), 352, 351(3) and the POCSO Act for alleged sexual assault of an eight‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed the allegations were false and that the informant had extorted Rs 1 lakh, asserting …
Petitioners Gyanmati and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition alleging that police repeatedly called them for interrogation despite not being named in the FIR lodged under section 137(2) of the Police Act (BNS) in connection with a case against Harishchandra. They sought a mandamus …
The petitioner, Data Prasad Pandey, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was found to be deficient in particulars. The court considered whether the petition could be dismissed on the ground of withdrawal. It held that the petitioner could be allowed to file a fresh …
M/S Tehri Pulp and Paper Ltd filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the Union of India and four other respondents. The petition was listed before a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Hon'ble Justice Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed …
M/S Tehri Pulp & Paper Ltd filed a writ petition (Writ Tax No. 2409 of 2026) against the Union of India and four other respondents. The petition was argued before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court, with Pooja Talwar representing the petitioner and Sudhanshu Srivastava, A.S.G.I., and …
M/S Tehri Pulp and Paper Ltd filed a writ petition (Writ Tax No. 2420 of 2026) against the Union of India and four other respondents. The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad disposed of the petition. The court directed that the orders be as per the earlier order dated in Writ Tax No. 2048 of 2026 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gaurav, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 561 of 2025) involving alleged offences under the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, citing a 19‑day delay in filing the FIR, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Akram, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 3 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Section 25 of the Arms Act. Akram had been in …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramzan Ali, who was arrested in connection with a case under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64(1), the POCSO Act (sections 3 and 4) and the SC/ST Act (section 3(2)(V). The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was filed four days after the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravi, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 95 of 2025 under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3/4(ii) of the POCSO Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, a minor aged 14-15, had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Tulsidas Rajbhar, who is charged under Sections 64(1), 352, 351(3) BNS and 5J(2)/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a woman who later gave birth to a child. The applicant contested the paternity of the child and sought DNA testing, while the …
The petitioner, Mohammad Asif, was appointed as a peon through an outsourcing arrangement by M/s Prime Cleaning Services, a private entity. He claimed he was not allowed to work from 16 September 2025 without any notice and wrote to the Presiding Officer of Industrial Tribunal-3, which led to an …
The petitioner was appointed as a peon on an outsourced basis by Respondent No.5 on 19 December 2024. He was barred from working from 16 September 2025 without any notice and subsequently approached the Industrial Tribunal, which issued an order on 25 February 2026. The petitioner then filed a writ …
Buddhvilas was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 94 of 2025) under Sections 137(2) and 64 of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the 19‑year‑old victim was a consenting party, and that her statement recorded …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajit Yadav under Section 483 BNSS in a case involving alleged violations of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act and the Information Technology Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the recovered mobile …
The Union of India filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) that granted the respondent a third MACP benefit. The CAT had relied on a Cuttack Bench decision (O.A. No. 485 of 2021) which was subsequently upheld by the Orissa …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shoaib, accused in a rape case involving sections of the IPC, the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that Shoaib stood guard while the co‑accused committed the offence, but the victim’s statements were inconsistent and she …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to set aside a civil order dated 30.05.2019 passed by the Civil Judge (J.D.) in Kushinagar, which was based on a criminal case under Sections 323, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants …
The applicant, Nazir Ali @ Kuddus, sought bail in a criminal case under Section 65(1) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication. He argued that the FIR was filed eight hours after the alleged incident, there was no medical evidence, and the victim’s age appeared to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code for Rahul Kohli, accused in a case under IPC Sections 105 and 115(2). The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR was lodged belatedly, there were no eye‑witnesses, and the only …
The High Court considered a contempt application filed by Jitendra Yadav after the Court had earlier, in a PIL, directed the petitioner to approach the Assistant Collector under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 to have illegal encroachments on Gaon Sabha land removed. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jitendra Samadhiya, who was in custody for offences under IPC sections 363, 323, 376, POCSO Act sections 3 and 4, and IT Act section 67. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the alleged victim, an 18‑year‑old, had consented to the …
The petitioner, Yashoda Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 24.03.2026 passed by the Naib-Tehsildar in a revenue case and also sought a mandamus directing the respondents not to disturb her peaceful possession. The respondents raised a …
The applicant, Brijmohan, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0038 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 69, 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed he was falsely implicated, stating that the alleged promise to marry the victim was unfulfilled and that no photographs or videos …
Arjun Prajapati applied for bail in a case registered under IPC sections 64(1) and 351(2) and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4, alleging that the alleged victim, a 19‑year‑old woman, was a consenting party and the matter stemmed from a failed consensual relationship. The applicant asserted his innocence, …
The petitioner, Abhishek Bansal, filed a writ petition seeking quashment of FIR No. 0125 of 2024, which alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The dispute was matrimonial, involving the petitioner (husband) and respondent No.4 (wife), and the …
Vikram Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to restrain the Special Land Acquisition Officer/District Magistrate from disbursing compensation for land acquisition (Gata No.460) to any private respondents until the final disposal of Writ B No.27 of 2026, and also requested that the officer …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay Kumar, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 111(2)(kha), 318(4), 61(2) of the IPC, the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 and Section 66D of the IT Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Amit in a criminal case (Crime No.110 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the IPC, the 2023 BNS provisions, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The State Law Officer informed the court that a notice to …
The petitioner, Damodar Housing Co‑Operative Society Ltd., filed a writ appeal before the Allahabad High Court and subsequently moved that the appeal be withdrawn, seeking liberty to pursue any other legal remedies. The court considered the petitioner's request and, finding no objection, allowed the …
The revisionist alleged that after a dispute in which a wall and door were broken, he was booked for breach of peace, released on bail, and subsequently assaulted by the opposite parties who attempted to throw him into a well. He sought to lodge an FIR for the assault, but the police failed to …
The Union of India filed a review petition challenging the High Court’s modification of a Tribunal order granting a disability pension to Shri Virendra Singh. The petition was filed beyond the statutory 363‑day period, but the Court condoned the delay on the basis of the applicant’s affidavit. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohan Kol (alias Sandeep Kol) in a criminal case (Crime No. 136 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The applicant pleaded innocence, asserting that the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Azam, who was charged under Sections 333, 65(1), 351(3) of the IPC, Section 183 of the CrPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a 17‑year‑old girl. The applicant pleaded innocence, highlighted a four‑day delay in …
The applicant, Sonu Kumar Keshari, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 481 of 2025) under Sections 333, 64(1) and 351(3) of the IPC. He claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR was lodged eight months after the incident and that a civil dispute had been converted into a criminal case, …
The applicant Suhail sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 226 of 2020) involving charges under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 376 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He claimed innocence, arguing that there was no medical evidence to support the rape allegation and …
The applicant, Kanhai Lal, had obtained an interim order from the writ court in Writ-A No. 16055 of 2023 directing that he be allowed to resume his duties as Safari Karmachari in Nagar Nigam, Bareilly and that his salary, including arrears, be paid. A compliance affidavit indicated that the arrears …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunil Kumar in Criminal Case No. 69 of 2026, where he was charged under IPC sections 62, 74, 108, 351(2) and sections 7 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The applicant alleged that the alleged incident occurred …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Devi Singh, who was charged under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the BNS and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, for allegedly having a sexual relationship with a 17‑year‑old girl who was pregnant. The applicant contended that the relationship …
The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Basic Education Officer (BSA) of Hapur to consider his compassionate appointment application filed on 24‑04‑2025 after his wife, an assistant teacher, died in harness, and also to release full salary …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dilshad Shabban, who was not named in the original FIR but was later implicated during investigation in a case involving multiple IPC offences and other statutes. The applicant argued that the allegations against him were vague, he had no …
The petitioner, M/S Candy Floss Educational Society, filed a writ petition seeking a refund of road tax paid on a vehicle (Regn. No. UP 78 HK 8250) after the Government of Uttar Pradesh issued an exemption order on June 28, 2024 for various categories of hybrid electric vehicles. The petition argued …
The applicant, Sherpal, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 235 of 2025) alleging assault under Sections 109, 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that Sherpal was armed with an axe and bore the main role in the assault, while the defence argued that he was …
Petitioner Sonu filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an FIR dated 21-04-2026, registered under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that there was no instigation, conspiracy, abetment or mens rea on his part. The State opposed the …
The petitioners, Singhal & Sons, filed a writ petition seeking direction for the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Kasganj, to decide pending applications for payment of Rs.1,65,000 with interest at 18% per annum filed on 3 Oct 2024 and 17 Oct 2024. The respondents argued that the competent authority …
The case Rajaram Paswan v. State of U.P. & Another was filed as an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The matter was listed as a fresh application on 22 May 2026 before Hon'ble Justice Saurabh Srivastava. The counsel for the applicant was Diwas Verma and for the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Prashant Baghel, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended …
Mukesh Singh applied for bail in a case under Section 108 of the B.N.S., alleging he abetted the suicide of a deceased who had taken a gold loan. The FIR was lodged on 2 April 2026 for an incident that allegedly occurred on 26 March 2026, creating a significant delay that the applicant argued …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Adarsh Nishad, who was charged under Sections 69, 64, 89 and 351(3) of the BNS in a case arising from an alleged consensual relationship that later turned into a criminal complaint. The victim was a 23‑year‑old woman and the …
Mahesh Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 41 of 2026) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 352, 74, 64(1), 115(2) and 333. He claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was lodged two and a half months after the incident and lacked medical evidence, and highlighted his clean …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sharif, Shamshad and Aslam in Criminal Case No.55 of 1989, where they were charged under Sections 325 and 308 IPC. The applicants claimed they were falsely implicated, noting that the original FIR involved offences under Sections 147, …
The petitioner, Smt. Usha Devi Maurya, challenged Resolution No. 14 dated 23.03.2023 of the Committee of Management of Zila Sahakari Bank Ltd., Mau, which proposed the absorption of a collection staff member and a Class‑IV employee into the bank. The bank’s Secretary/CEO requested the Assistant …
The petitioner applied for a passport but the Regional Passport Officer in Lucknow did not process the application, citing a pending criminal case against him. The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the officer to decide the application within a specified period. The Court noted prior …
Petitioner Prahlad Sharma filed a writ petition seeking a direction that the State of Uttar Pradesh and others not interfere with his peaceful possession of land (Khasra No. 682) and not undertake any construction without due process, also claiming damages under the Right to Fair Compensation and …
The Allahabad High Court considered the bail application of Brahma @ Chunmun in Crime No. 59 of 2026, filed under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 118(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the victim’s finger injury was not caused by a human bite and was not …
Sarnam Singh filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by the Kanpur Development Authority under Section 26Ka(4) of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, seeking a direction that his reply to the notice be decided promptly and that no coercive action be taken against him. The …
The applicant, Zubair, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 47 of 2026) involving sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 69 of the Indian Penal Code, arising from an alleged failed consensual relationship that was later criminalised. The victim, a 21‑year‑old adult, alleged assault and related …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Awadhesh Lodhi, who was arrested in a case under Sections 21 and 22 of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 160 g of Alprazolam. The applicant contended that the …
Harsh Rai was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 17 of 2026) alleging assault with a sharp‑edged weapon (tangari) under Sections 191(3), 109(1), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The victim, Sanjeev Rai, sustained two incised wounds and a contused swelling, none of which were life‑threatening. …
The petitioners, a group of street vendors, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of several orders of the Noida Authority and mandamus directing the authority to protect their vending items and issue vending certificates under the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anand, who was arrested on 29 March 2026 in connection with a case under Sections 351(2), 352, 115(2) and 109(1) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, asserting that affidavits from the injured party and the informant denied his …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Roshan @ Akash, who was named in an FIR under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the B.N.S. for an alleged abduction. The applicant contended that the victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS indicated a consensual relationship and no offence, asserting …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNNS seeking discharge of a criminal case (Criminal Appeal No. 842/2020) in which they were charged under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 427 and 452. The trial court had earlier dismissed a discharge application filed on 03.12.2025, and the …
Harshit Enterprises filed a writ petition challenging the sealing of its shop by the Chief Environment Officer, Aligarh, under Section 31(A) of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. The petitioner argued that it is a small‑scale key‑making unit with no hazardous emissions and that …
Petitioner Saba Khanam, the wife, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Agra, to expedite a pending maintenance proceeding under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Case No. 706 of 2024). The petition argued that the case had been …
The petitioner, Parmanand, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice dated 01‑09‑2023 and a subsequent order dated 28‑04‑2025 issued by the Chief Executive Officer of the Noida Authority, alleging that his structures were on unacquired land. Earlier, the Division Bench had directed the …
Petitioner Rukam Singh, the first informant in an FIR dated 29 March 2026, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a free, fair and impartial investigation and to transfer the investigation to another officer. He alleged that the police were not investigating …
The petitioner, Jiledar, claimed ownership of two plots in Jaunpur and sought possession after a favorable order under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was issued on 16‑02‑2023. Although stones were affixed on the land, possession had not been delivered, prompting a writ petition for …
The petitioners, Avitek Computers and Nitin Kumar Varshney, filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 29 August 2024 passed under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. They contended that the order was erroneous and sought its setting aside. …
Petitioner Zahida Begum filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others to release her late husband's pension and family pension and to decide a representation filed on 23-12-2025 in accordance with earlier judgments dated 12-03-2018 and 03-08-2023. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Virendra Kumar Srivastava, challenged an order dated 04.07.2025 issued by the Deputy Director of Agriculture, Siddharthnagar, which sought recovery against him. The petitioner contended that the order was passed without any notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Consolidation Officer, Rustampur, Gorakhpur, to decide a title objection under Section 9‑A(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Housing Act (case No. 1333 of 2018). The objection remained pending despite a remand order under …
The applicant, Satendra, filed a bail application in Criminal Case No. 509 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS suggested consent, noting that she had accompanied …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to refer a civil dispute (originally filed under Sections 323, 504, 506) to a mediation centre. The lower civil judge had issued a summons order dated 10‑09‑2025, which the applicants challenged, …
Petitioner Zunaid Alam challenged orders that declared him a "goonda" and imposed a six‑month exile under the Uttar Pradesh Control of Goondas Act, 1970. The orders were based on five pending criminal cases against him. He filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quash of the orders and a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Javed, who was charged under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act for possession of 135 grams of charas, a quantity below the commercial threshold. The applicant argued …
The petitioner, Shiv Pujan, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 10919 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Vishnu Kant Tiwari, informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The Court …
The appellant, Priyanka Goyal, filed a writ petition seeking payment of her current salary, alleging a continuing cause of action despite a 16‑year lapse since her appointment. The single judge dismissed the petition at the fresh stage without ordering a counter affidavit, reasoning that the delay …
The applicant Sunil Kumar filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 18‑08‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 18‑01‑2025 in a case where he was charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that, according to the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pramod Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a death alleged to be a suicide and charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including Section 108 (abetment of suicide). The applicant contended that the FIR was lodged two days …
Petitioner Rajan Lal filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) to consider his representation dated 27 May 2025 and refer the dispute to the Principal Civil Court under Section 3H(4) of the National Highway Act, 1956. The petitioner limited his …
Santosh Gupta applied for renewal of his passport but the Regional Passport Officer in Lucknow refused to process it, citing a pending criminal case against him. He filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the issuance of the passport. The Court referred to its earlier decisions in Pawan …
The petitioner, Mahesh Kumar Yadav, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner requested that the petition be dismissed so that a fresh petition could be filed with better averments and documents. The Court accepted this prayer, granting the …
Munna Lal filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Executive Officer of Nagar Panchayat Kurawali to pay Rs.4,08,391 as retrial benefits with interest and to consider his representations dated 15‑12‑2025 and 26‑02‑2026. The respondents argued that the grievance should be redressed by …
Smt. Siya Dulari filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of U.P. and two other respondents. The petitioner, through counsel R.B. Singh, sought relief but did not press the petition at the hearing. The respondents, represented by C.S.C. and Hari …
Petitioner Rajneesh Ranjan filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Koraon, Prayagraj, to decide a pending partition suit under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within a short, fixed period. The petitioner relied on Sub‑Rule (10) of Rule …
The petitioner, Kiran Sahani, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against him. The State, represented by the Additional Advocate General, informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Dharmendra Kumar, who was arrested in Crime No. 134 of 2024 under Sections 137(2), 87 and 351(2) of the BNS. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting no allegation of abduction or sexual assault and pointing out that …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Shubham Kumar Kashyap in a case under Section 108 of the B.N.S., alleging abetment of suicide of three persons. The applicant contended that the deaths were suicides resulting from personal debt and that the prosecution evidence – …
The petitioners, M/s Warsi Bag, challenged an ex parte adjudication order dated 17 February 2025 issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. They contended that the order was erroneous and sought relief through a writ petition. The respondents, the State of Uttar …
Mohd Sadiq Nawab filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the summons and the criminal complaint (Case No. 24332 of 2025) filed by Mustjab under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for a bounced cheque of Rs.10 lakh. The applicant claimed the complaint was malicious and that …
Petitioner Poonam Verma, an Asha Karyakarti posted at Community Health Center Lodhi, was terminated by an order dated 19-02-2026 issued by the Chief Medical Officer, Aligarh, following a complaint. The petitioner challenged the termination, contending that no notice or opportunity to be heard was …
The applicant, Gaurav, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 116 of 2025) involving allegations of gang rape under several sections of the BNS. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged incident was a consensual relationship and that the victim’s statement was misleading. The …
Dr. Birbal Ram filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh to decide an objection dated 23‑10‑2019 and to issue the final seniority list for the post of Lecturer in a Government Ayurvedik College, as well as to consider a representation dated 03‑12‑2025. The petitioner …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 15‑07‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 40628 of 2000. The order was served to the opposite party on 24‑07‑2025, but no compliance was shown. The …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vinod Kumar, who was arrested in a NDPS case involving alleged recovery of 25 kg of ganja from a car in which he was found. The applicant contended that he was …
Ratan Singh, detained since 25 May 2024, faced charges under Sections 498‑A and 304‑B of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in a case registered as Crime No. 0102 of 2024. After a prior bail application was rejected, he filed a second bail petition, arguing that he had been in …
The petitioner, Vineet Kumar Singh, challenged an order dated 25 March 2026 that imposed a minor punishment on him. The respondents argued that the writ petition was not maintainable because the petitioner could appeal the punishment under Regulation 69 of the State Bank of India Officers Service …
