Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 7801–8000

SURENDRA YADAV ALIAS SONU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Surendra Yadav, who is charged under Sections 8, 20, 27A, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act. The applicant’s name appeared only in the confessional statement of co‑accused Meera …

M/S PRISCA GLOBALversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, STATE TAX (SGST) AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, M/S Prisca Global, challenged an adjudication order dated 13‑02‑2025 issued after its GST registration was cancelled on 09‑09‑2021. The State had served a show‑cause notice electronically via the Common Portal, despite the cancellation that disabled the petitioner from accessing the …

M/S PRISCA GLOBALversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SARDHANA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, M/S Prisca Global, challenged an adjudication order dated 17‑05‑2024 issued after its GST registration had been cancelled on 09‑09‑2021. The respondents served a show‑cause notice electronically via the Common Portal, despite the cancellation that disabled the petitioner from …

M/S PRISCA GLOBALversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SARDHANA AND ANOTHER

M/S Prisca Global challenged an adjudication order dated 17‑05‑2024, arguing that the show‑cause notice issued electronically on 07‑03‑2024 was invalid because its GST registration had been cancelled on 09‑09‑2021. The Court noted that after cancellation, the petitioner could no longer access the …

HEAD CONSTABLE SHAYAM AUTAR DIXITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Head Constable Shayam Autar Dixit retired on 31 May 2025. An order dated 18 March 2025, issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, retrospectively revised his salary to 1 January 2006 without giving him any notice or opportunity to be heard. The petitioner contended that the order violated the …

SMT. KALYANI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Kalyani Devi, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2, the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, to decide a restoration application filed on 17‑07‑2023 under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged that …

SOURYA ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Sourya Estates Private Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, owned one‑third shares in two plots that were acquired by the government and an award for compensation was made on 30‑12‑2023. The company filed a writ petition seeking the disbursement of the awarded compensation, …

MAHENDRA GUPTA @ PANKAJ GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mahendra Gupta (also known as Pankak Gupta) in Criminal Case No. 41 of 2026, where he was alleged to be involved under Sections 109, 115(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the FIR assigned the …

MOOLCHAND UPADHYAY AND 15 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Sixteen petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Secretary of the U.P. Basic Education Board to consider their candidature for the post of Assistant Teacher (Science and Mathematics) advertised on 11 July 2013. They alleged that their grievance regarding selection and appointment …

RAM CHANDRA KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Chandra Kushwaha, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Nagar Nigam Prayagraj/Prayagraj Development Authority to pay compensation for land acquired in Arazi No.840 (0.491 hectare). The State counsel highlighted a Government Order dated 12‑05‑2016 which mandates …

KAVITA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kavita Devi, challenged the order dated 10‑02‑2026 of the District Programme Officer, Ballia, which rejected her claim for appointment as Anganwadi Karyakatri. She argued that the earlier appointment of respondent No.3, Pallavi Prajapati, was cancelled and that, being second on the …

VISHAL PARIHARversusSTATE OF U.P.AND 3 OTHERS

Vishal Parihar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 25 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the BNS Act and Sections 5J(2) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The court noted a 20‑day delay in lodging the FIR but observed that the victim’s statement indicated consent and that …

ASHISHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ashish, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking bail in two criminal matters pending before the Budhana police stations. He had been incarcerated since 9 April 2026 and was unable to furnish two separate sureties for each case due to poverty. The applicant …

BACHCHA LALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Bachcha Lal, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Vice‑Chancellor of Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur, to grant interest on arrears of payments due from 19‑April‑2018 to 23‑June‑2022. He claimed that he had made several representations …

PINKIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Pinki, who was implicated in a NDPS case (Sections 8, 20, 29) for alleged involvement in the recovery of 1.250 kg of ganja from a co‑accused's possession. The applicant …

SARVESH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to set aside a complaint order dated 11‑12‑2025 in case 425/2024 (Kanya Devi v. Sarvesh & others). The High Court examined the procedural history, noting that the complainant’s statement was …

GOVIND SONIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Govind Soni filed an appeal seeking to quash the summoning and cognizance order dated 10-10-2024 in Complaint Case No. 62 of 2024, which alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and Section 3(1)(da)(dha) of the SC/ST Act. He contended that no offence was made out against him …

SANJANAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sanjana, the wife of a deceased man, who was charged under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for allegedly abetting his suicide. Sanjana contended that she was falsely implicated, pointing out a two‑day delay in filing the FIR and a post‑mortem report …

SANTOSH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Santosh Singh, accused under Sections 85 and 108 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act for alleged dowry harassment leading to the suicide of his wife. The applicant contended that the FIR was lodged three days after the incident, that …

BANNO NISHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Banno Nisha, filed a Section 528 application challenging several orders of the subordinate criminal court that denied her the opportunity to testify under Section 244 of the CrPC in a sexual assault case. The trial court had earlier issued summons under IPC Sections 354 and 504 …

SUNIL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Sunil and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 2433/2016) pending before the Hapur court, which involved offences under Sections 323, 452, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicants asserted that a settlement agreement dated …

DR. WASIM AHMAD SIDDIQUIversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

Dr. Wasim Ahmad Siddiqui filed a writ petition seeking to quash the demolition of his property by the Union of India and other respondents, to obtain compensation for the land and structures, and to have the disputed area demarcated. He later indicated he would not pursue the demarcation relief as …

PROF. RAVI PRASAD SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Prof. Ravi Prasad Srivastava, a government employee, filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the Director of Education (Higher Education), U.P., to sanction his gratuity and encashment of 79 days of earned leave. He relied on the Supreme Court judgment in Avdhesh Kumar Singh v. State …

VINOD KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Vinod Kumar Sharma filed a writ petition challenging the Commissioner of Rural Development, U.P.'s order dated 22‑12‑2025 which denied his claim for leave encashment for 150 days. The petitioner relied on the earlier decision of this Court in Ganesh Prasad Tiwari v. State of U.P. (Writ A No. 12721 …

SMT. VANDANA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Vandana Singh, filed an application for compensation under the Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojna on 12 March 2026, which remains pending before the District Magistrate, Prayagraj. She approached the High Court seeking a direction that the competent authority decide her …

SMT SUSHMA KATIYARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt Sushma Katiyar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to pay compensation for her land acquisition based on the current residential circle rate fixed by the District Magistrate. The State of U.P. and other respondents objected, arguing that the …

PUNEET KUMAR VISHWAKARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Puneet Kumar Vishwakarma filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and other respondents to pay compensation for his land acquisition based on the current residential circle rate fixed by the District Magistrate. The State, through its standing counsel, objected that …

SHASHWAT MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Shashwat Mishra filed a B.N.S.S. application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the summons dated 15‑10‑2025 and the entire Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act proceedings pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division‑2, Kanpur. The applicant contended that the dispute …

MANISH SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Manish Srivastava applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 216 of 2025) under Sections 143(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, noting that he is not named in the FIR or the victim’s statement under Section 180, and that the victim’s statement under …

MAMTA DEVIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Mamta Devi filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 7307 of 2026) challenging an order dated 21‑04‑2025 that was issued to her under the Right to Information Act. The petitioner sought relief against the said order. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner prayed that the petition be …

PANKAJ DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Pankaj Dubey, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Evidence Act seeking modification of a maintenance order dated 28‑03‑2026 and 02‑05‑2026 issued by the Additional District Judge, Jaunpur. The order required the applicant to pay Rs 3,000 per month to the respondent …

TULSIRAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioners, Tulsiram and two others, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the third respondent to decide a pending civil case (No. 11113 of 2024, Sita Ram & Others vs Nagar Panchayat Harraiya & Others) under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to maintain a status‑quo on a …

JITENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Jitendra Kumar, a daily wager in the Uttar Pradesh Forest Department, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to pay him the minimum wage of Rs 18,000 per month as prescribed by the 7th Pay Commission. He alleged that despite several representations, the department had not paid …

DORI LALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Dori Lal, a daily wage employee of the Uttar Pradesh Forest Department, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to pay him the minimum wage of Rs 18,000 per month as recommended by the 7th Pay Commission. He alleged that despite several representations and a directive issued by …

LAXMI NARAYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a daily wager in the Uttar Pradesh Forest Department, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to pay him the minimum wage of Rs 18,000 per month as recommended by the 7th Pay Commission. He alleged that despite several representations, the department had …

BHAGWAT SARANversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Bhagwat Saran, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an order dated 22 April 2026 of the District Basic Education Officer, Bareilly, which rejected his claim for a disability family pension on the ground that a disability certificate was not produced during the lifetime of the …

M/S HANUMAN TRADIND COMPANYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, M/s Hanuman Trading Company, challenged an adjudication order dated 04‑04‑2024 issued after a show‑cause notice was served electronically on 12‑12‑2023, despite its GST registration having been cancelled on 13‑01‑2021. The Court examined whether, under Section 169(1)(a)(b) of the …

VIVEKANAND AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner, Prayagraj Division, to decide a stay application dated 04-04-2026 filed in Revision No. C 202602000000593 under Section 210 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. They contended that the stay application had been …

SHASHIKANT SONKARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shashikant Sonkar, a Village Development Officer, was arrested for allegedly demanding Rs 10,000 to approve a bill of Rs 99,240 and was caught with the money. He is charged under Sections 7 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (amended 2018) and has been in custody since 25 March 2026. …

SHAMIM KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Shamim Khan was dismissed from service on 28 February 2014 on the ground of his conviction under Sections 120B, 302, 364 and 218 of the IPC, without any notice or show‑cause letter. He challenged the dismissal in Writ A No.7224 of 2024, which the Allahabad High Court set aside, quashing the …

POSI RAM SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, a Deputy Superintendent of Police, superannuated on 30 June 2025, challenged a salary revision order dated 25 June 2025 that was back‑dated to 26 October 2024. The petitioner argued that the order was passed without any notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of …

SUCHIT KUMAR DIXITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Suchit Kumar Dixit filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash a recovery citation dated 20‑04‑2026 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate under Rules 158 and 162 of the U.P. Land Revenue Code, 2006, which was based on an order dated 28‑09‑2021 in State v. Suchit …

SANJAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Sanjay filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court alleging that the Project Manager of Uttar Pradesh Bridge Corporation Ltd., who had issued a notice on 27.08.2024, had not taken any decision despite the petitioner’s detailed replies dated 24.09.2024 and 24.11.2024. The …

RAMESH SINGH SIDDHUversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Ramesh Singh Siddhu filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 21 November 2025 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Ghaziabad. The petitioner contended that the order was contrary to law, relying on the precedent set in Sachichida Nand Tripathi v. State of U.P. (Writ A No.69308 of 2013). The …

YASH SINGHversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Yash Singh, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an order dated 03.08.2024 that rejected his claim for a compassionate appointment under the Dying-in-Harness Rules, 1974, on the ground of non‑compliance with the prescribed filing period. The petition highlighted that the delay—over …

RAVISHANKARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Ravishankar who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false implication, …

OSAN SINGHversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner Osan Singh challenged a disciplinary order that imposed a minimum‑pay‑scale punishment for three years, based on the recommendation of the inquiry officer. He argued that the inquiry officer’s role is limited to investigating and finding guilt, and that recommending punishment is …

MAHESH CHANDR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28-10-2024 passed by the Collector of Firozabad under Section 128 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which stayed proceedings for cancellation of a lease granted to them. They sought a writ of certiorari to quash the order, a writ of …

PARVEJ ALIAS PARINDAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Parvej alias Parinda, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 06‑03‑2025 issued in State of U.P. v. Aafeem (Case No.10113 of 2021) under IPC sections 379 and 411. The High Court examined the record and found …

SADHNA DIXITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sadhna Dixit, filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance and summoning orders in a criminal case (Case No. 4196 of 2024) that alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that, based on the Supreme …

DR. HARESH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Dr. Haresh Kumar Singh filed a writ petition challenging the delay by the Chief Medical Officer, Hathras, in deciding his application for registration and permission to practice community medical services. The petitioner argued that the matter had been pending since 2 March 2026 without a decision. …

RAMESH JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ramesh Jaiswal, sought bail in a criminal case alleging false implication for abduction and sexual assault. The prosecution alleged that he kept the victim for several days and later handed her to a co‑accused who committed rape, also citing a prior conviction under the Essential …

SUHAILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Suhail sought bail in a case involving alleged rape, dowry harassment, assault, and violations of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act. The prosecution alleged that Suhail, the brother‑in‑law of the victim, raped her on 22 March 2026 and participated in a violent …

SMT SIKHA RAJPOOT AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants, Smt. Sikha Rajpoot and Virendra Kurmi, were arrested in Crime No. 752 of 2025 under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the BNS. They filed a bail application claiming false implication, noting that the victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS denied any abduction or sexual assault and …

DHARMENDRAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dharmendra, applied for renewal of his passport (No. P2654380) but the Regional Passport Officer in Lucknow did not process the application, citing a pending criminal case against him. He filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the officer to renew the passport. The Court …

M/S DS ENTERPRISESversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

M/s Ds Enterprises filed a writ petition challenging Condition No.2 in the Letter of Acceptance, which required it to furnish an additional performance guarantee of 15.01% of the estimated cost, alleging that the tender documents only mandated a 5% guarantee. The petitioner argued that the office …

GURMUKH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gurmukh Singh, a sugarcane grower, filed a writ petition alleging non-payment of dues by respondent No.6, a private sugarcane buyer. The petitioner also claimed that a representation filed before respondent No.2 was pending decision. Respondent No.6 contended that 50% of the amount …

FIROZversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Firoz, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 17 January 2024 issued by the Additional District Judge, Agra, for his alleged non‑appearance in a trial concerning offences under Sections 302 and 147 of …

M/S AL-SAFA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITEDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, M/s Al‑Safa Industries Pvt Ltd, challenged an order dated 04‑11‑2025 issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017, which was passed on the same day the show‑cause notice was issued and without granting a personal hearing. The court held that this contravened the basic …

HARI SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 8 OTHER

Petitioner Hari Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Arbitration) to decide an arbitration under Section 3G(5) of the National Highway Act, 1956, alleging irreparable loss if delayed. The respondents contended that the petition was not maintainable …

SHRI KRISHNA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash Special Session Trial No. 474 of 2024 in which they were summoned under IPC sections 323/149, 392/149, 394/149 and 395/149. They asserted that a compromise between the parties was entered …

SMT. PRERNA RANAversusPARIKSHIT RANA

The applicant, Smt. Prerna Rana, filed a transfer application under Section 24 of the CPC seeking to move a matrimonial suit (Case No. 1583 of 2023) filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act from the Family Court in Muzaffarnagar to the Family Court in Shahjahanpur. She contended that she …

DILEEP KUMARversusVINOD KUMAR AND 7 OTHERS

The petition filed by Dileep Kumar against Vinod Kumar and seven others was listed before the Allahabad High Court under Article 227. The petitioner’s counsel, Anil Kumar Pathak and Chandra Pratap Singh, failed to appear before the court. The respondent’s counsel, Satyam Mishra, was present and …

HRIDESH KUMAR GUPTAversusVIPIN KUMAR

The petition filed by Hridesh Kumar Gupta under Article 227 was not pursued by the petitioner. The court observed that there was no appearance or action taken to press the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated. No …

ARUN MISHRA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The appellants were summoned under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC provisions following an altercation arising from an eviction dispute. They contended that the FIR was fabricated, that the alleged victim Priyanka Paswan never lodged a complaint, and that any abusive …

JITENDRA SINGH TOMARversusSHRI DEEPAK KUMAR, TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL - SADAR

The High Court, in a writ petition (PIL No.2390 of 2021), directed the applicant to file an application under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, to determine alleged encroachment. The applicant complied, and the Revenue Team submitted a report on 18‑08‑2025 stating that no encroachment …

ANKITA VERMAversusSARVESH KUMAR

The applicant, Ankita Verma, filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad seeking to transfer the suit. No further steps were taken to prosecute the application. The court observed that there was no appearance by the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the …

GOPAL JI PANDEYversusANURAG SINGH, TEHSILDAR

The writ court had directed the Tehsildar to complete proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The Tehsildar filed a compliance affidavit on 21 October 2024, attaching the order dated 27 March 2024 as annexure. The applicant, Gopal Ji Pandey, filed a contempt application alleging …

SATSANG KUMAR AND 178 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 16 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. After investigation, a charge-sheet was filed in the trial court, rendering the petition apparently infructuous. The petitioners, through their counsel, requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, …

ANSHUL GUPTAversusSHRI MANISH KUMAR VERMA, DISTRICT COLLECTOR

The writ court had directed the District Collector to recover a sum from defaulter firms as per a recovery certificate issued by RERA. The applicant filed a contempt application alleging non‑compliance. The opposite party submitted an affidavit showing that the outstanding amount of Rs.70,21,712 was …

SAHAB LALversusDR PC SAXENA, DIRECTOR, AYURVED SERVICES

The High Court, in a writ petition, directed the petitioner, a pharmacist, to file a fresh representation regarding his transfer request within three weeks, and the respondent was to decide it within two months. The petitioner filed a contempt application alleging non‑compliance with that order. The …

RAM DIN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ram Din and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an unspecified action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners, Ashutosh Mishra, on behalf of B.P. Vishwakarma, argued that the petition …

HARPALversusSURAJ SINGH DIVISIONAL DIRECTOR SOCIAL FORESTRY

In Contempt Application (Civil) No. 4943 of 2024, the applicant Harpal filed a contempt petition against Suraj Singh, Divisional Director Social Forestry. The applicant's counsel, Ramendra Kumar Shukla, informed the court that the order of the writ court had been fully complied with, rendering the …

SRINATH AND 5 OTHERSversusSUDESH KUMAR SINGH AND 9 OTHERS

The High Court had earlier issued an interim order on 11 November 2022 directing the parties to maintain the status quo over a disputed land parcel (Gata No. 180). The parties filed a compliance affidavit on 25 September 2024 stating that no construction or other activity was being undertaken on the …

SANTRAJ YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Santraj Yadav filed a criminal revision under Section 173(4) of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the police to lodge an FIR against his daughter‑in‑law and her brother, alleging false allegations. The trial court had dismissed the application as false and frivolous, noting that the dispute …

DEVENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Devendra, accused under Sections 127(2), 65(1) BNS and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence involving a 14‑15‑year‑old victim. The applicant argued that the FIR was delayed, the victim appeared to be a consenting party, and the age …

SWAYAMVEER YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The applicant, Swayamveer Yadav, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. The application was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Vikram D. Chauhan. No substantive arguments or evidence were presented, and the …

SWAYAMVEER YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Swayamveer Yadav, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. The application was listed before Hon'ble Justice Vikram D. Chauhan. No substantive arguments or evidence were presented, and the …

VINAY DUBEYversusRAKESH KUMAR, DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS

Vinay Dubey filed a civil contempt application (No. 5056 of 2024) against Rakesh Kumar, District Inspector of Schools, alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. The applicant was represented by counsel Shatrughan Sonwal and Shivendu Ojha, Sr. Advocate, while the opposite party was represented …

SMT. MAMTA AGARWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Smt. Mamta Agarwal filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other parties. The application was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Vikram D. Chauhan. No further submissions or evidence were presented by the applicant. The learned …

PRASHANT YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Prashant Yadav filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of U.P. and another respondent. The matter was listed before Justice Anil Kumar‑X and was heard by counsel for both parties. The petitioner, through his …

ASHUTOSH SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ashutosh Sharma, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Agra Development Authority. The respondents submitted instructions and the petitioner's counsel, Vijay Tripathi, argued that the petition should be …

SHRI JI SEEDSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad heard an appeal by Shri Ji Seeds against the dismissal of a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act concerning a dishonoured cheque of Rs 6.60 lakh. The trial court had dismissed the complaint under Section 256 of the CrPC and acquitted the …

SANDEEP KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief after a matter was referred to a Mediation Centre. The court noted that, although the matter was referred to mediation on 23 October 2024, the applicants failed to deposit the required Rs 30,000 with …

ABHISHEK BANSAL AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quashal of an FIR (Case Crime No. 0125 of 2024) registered under Sections 85, 115, 352, 351, 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The High Court noted that the same …

GOVIND AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged in Crime No.103 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the State's Additional …

SHAHID ALIAS SADIQ AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shahid alias Sadiq and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (chargesheet no. A-383/24) filed in Crime No.0465 of 2024 under several sections of the BNS. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State’s …

CHUNNI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, an elderly SC/ST widow, was allotted a dwelling under the Manyawar Shri Kanshiram Ji Shahri Garib Awas Yojna but was served an eviction notice by the Prayagraj Development Authority (PDA) without a hearing. She challenged the notice, seeking quashing of the order and mandamus for …

IRSHAD AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Irshad Ahmad, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of proceedings. The matter had been referred to a Mediation Centre, where the petitioner was required to deposit Rs.30,000 but failed to do so, resulting in no notice to the second …

NEHA VERMAversusDHARM PRAKASH SONI

Neha Verma filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 586 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. The applicant was represented by counsel Mainuddin Ahamad, while the opposite party, Dharm Prakash Soni, was represented by Mohan Yadav. No appearance was made by the …

VIKRAM NAYYAR @ SANJEEV NAYYAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ under Article 226 seeking a direction to the respondent bank to defreeze two of their accounts that had been frozen during a police investigation related to a criminal complaint against one of them. The petitioners argued that no court order of attachment existed and …

PARVATIversusDR. VANDANA MISHRA, SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNAUR

The writ court had directed the opposite party, Dr. Vandana Mishra, to complete proceedings under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The opposite party filed an affidavit stating that the proceedings were concluded on 31-10-2025, attaching the relevant document as Annexure 3. The court …

SMT. GUNJANversusADESH RANJAN

The applicant, Smt. Gunjan, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 597 of 2025 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad seeking to transfer the suit. The application was listed but no steps were taken by the applicant to prosecute the matter. The court observed that there was no appearance …

RAHUL KESHARWANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

A criminal revision was filed by Rahul Kesharwani challenging the District Magistrate's order rejecting the release of a vehicle under Section 5A of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955. The petitioner argued that the revision could be filed before the High Court. The Court …

DIPU SAHAversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Dipu Saha, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief after a matter was referred to a Mediation Centre. The court had ordered the matter to be mediated on 21 October 2024, and the Mediation Centre required the applicant to deposit Rs. …

RAM SHANKARversusSHRI MADAN GABARIYAL AND 2 OTHERS

Ram Shankar filed a contempt proceeding under Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the Kanpur Development Authority demolished his property in violation of a decree in Civil Appeal No.116 of 2013 and without filing a special appeal. The factual dispute was whether demolition …

SMT. PROMILA SINGHversusANKIT

Smt. Promila Singh filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 616 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court, seeking to move the suit against Ankit. The application was filed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Rules of the Court. The Court examined whether the applicant’s counsel had complied with the …

MOHARRAM ALIAS ALI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the filing of a charge sheet (chargesheet no. A-383/24) in Crime No.0465 of 2024, which alleged their involvement under several sections of the B.N.S. Act. No petitioner counsel appeared before the Court, though the …

SMT SONIYA JAINversusVIKAS GUPTA

Smt Soniya Jain filed a transfer application in the High Court of Allahabad. No counsel appeared for the applicant, while the opposite party's counsel, Devashish Mitra, was present. The court observed that the applicant failed to prosecute the application. Consequently, the transfer application was …

TARUN KUMAR @ TARUN KUMAR GUPTA AND 2 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Tarun Kumar and two others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash proceedings. The matter had earlier been referred to a Mediation Centre, where the petitioners were required to deposit Rs.30,000 but failed to do so. Consequently, no …

ANISH AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Anish Ahmad, who was implicated in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 19 of 2025) involving sections 308(2), 318(4), 319(2), 61(2) of the same Act and sections 66 and 66D of …

SHYAMVEER AND 2 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief after a mediation process was initiated. The court had ordered the matter to be referred to a Mediation Centre, and the applicants were required to deposit Rs.25,000 before the Centre. The Mediation …

SMT. GEETAversusHARENDRA SINGH

The applicant, Smt. Geeta, filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The court observed that there was no prosecution of the application. Consequently, the transfer application was dismissed for …

SMT. SWATI BHATTversusAJEET SHARMA

Smt. Swati Bhatt filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 628 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking transfer of the suit. No appearance was made by the applicant to press the application. The learned counsel for the opposite party, Utkarsh Khanna, was present. The Court observed that the …

RAJENDRAversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The revisionist, Rajendra, filed an application under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking maintenance from his son, Rupesh, alleging his own inability to earn due to health issues. Earlier, a 2004 order had directed Rajendra to pay maintenance to Rupesh's mother, sister and Rupesh …

DHARMVEER GAUTAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The revisionist, Dharmveer Gautam, filed a criminal revision seeking to quash the charge framed by the Additional Session Judge, FTC‑I (Crime Against Women) Jaunpur under Section 376(2)(N) IPC in a rape case allegedly occurring in Mumbai. He contended that the FIR and victim’s statement, recorded …

SHIVAM @ CHHOTU AND ANOTHERversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Shivam @ Chhotu and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The matter had been referred to a Mediation Centre, where the petitioners were required to deposit Rs.25,000, which they failed to do, resulting in no notice being …

SMT. LAKSHMI PALversusDURVESH KUMAR

The applicant, Smt. Lakshmi Pal, filed a transfer application (civil) seeking to move the suit to another court. The respondent, Durvesh Kumar, appeared through counsel. The court observed that the applicant failed to prosecute the application, as no steps were taken to press it forward. …

SMT. RICHA SRIVASTAVversusAKASH VIJAY SRIVASTAV

Smt. Richa Srivastav filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 656 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit against Akash Vijay Srivastav. The applicant's counsel, Ashish Kumar Pandey and Nandini Mishra, appeared, but the applicant herself did not appear to press the …

DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINGHversusRAVINDRA KUMAR MANDER, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

The applicant, Dharmendra Kumar Singh, filed a contempt application against the District Magistrate, Ravindra Kumar Mander, alleging non-compliance with a writ court order. The applicant was represented by counsel Prashant Sharma. The respondent had no counsel appearing. During the hearing, counsel …

SMT. NITISHA BANSALversusDR. RAVI PRAKKASH GAUR

Smt. Nitisha Bansal filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 666 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit to another court. The applicant failed to appear before the court to press the application. The learned judge observed that there was no prosecution of the …

ASHOK KUMARversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ashok Kumar, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The matter had earlier been referred to a Mediation Centre, where the applicant was required to deposit Rs.60,000 but failed to do so, resulting in no notice being issued to the second …

AKHILESH AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Akhilesh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief. After a final report was filed, the petitioners, through counsel, requested to withdraw the petition. The Court accepted the prayer, dismissed the petition as withdrawn, and granted liberty to file a fresh …

AKHILversusSTATE OF U.P.

Akhil, accused of assault by firearm and related offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act, applied for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The injured party suffered a simple jaw injury, and the applicant has no prior criminal record, having been in …

SMT DEEPANJALYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, a contractual Protection Officer, was terminated by the District Probation Officer on 30 July 2025 following a complaint alleging a demand for a bribe. The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the termination, arguing that no notice or opportunity to be heard was provided and …

RAJKUMAR PANDEY ND 4 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief in a criminal matter. The opposite party informed the court that the case had been referred to the Mediation & Conciliation Centre, where mediation was completed but no settlement was reached. The …

SACHIN JAISWAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Sachin Jaiswal and two others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. The application was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, but no party appeared to press the matter. The learned …

MULAYAM YADAVversusSRI ARVIND RAJ MISHRA, DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

The applicant, Mulayam Yadav, filed a civil contempt application (No. 6208 of 2024) against the Divisional Forest Officer, Sri Arvind Raj Mishra, alleging non‑compliance with a writ order. Counsel for the applicant, Anil Kumar Shukla and Sarita Jhingan, submitted that the writ order had been fully …

VEERENDRA SINGH @ VIRENDRA KATIYARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. No substantive hearing took place as the matter was listed but no party appeared to press the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The court, noting …

MOHAMMAD HANEEFversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohammad Haneef, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Complaint No.18308 of 2023 and related summons and N.B.W. orders, alleging that the complaint was a false, retaliatory claim arising from a family dispute. The opposite party contended that the …

SMT. PRAVEENversusVANDANA, COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION ACT

The applicant Smt. Praveen filed a civil contempt application (No. 5517 of 2025) against Vandana, Commissioner Employee Compensation Act, alleging non‑compliance with a writ court order. The applicant’s counsel, Avinash Pandey, informed the High Court that the writ court order had been fully …

JAGAT ALIAS JAGATRAJ AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief after a matter was referred to a Mediation Centre. The court noted that the applicants had failed to deposit the required Rs.20,000 with the Mediation Centre, resulting in no notice being issued to …

SHRI VIJAY PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order that directed the institution of a case under Section 38 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The respondents argued that the petitioner had already appeared before the concerned authority and lodged objections. The High Court held that a …

ANGAD KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash a summoning order dated 17.03.2021 and a subsequent revision order, as well as the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 825 of 2020 under Section 4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant had earlier been referred to the Mediation and …

SARITAversusOMVEER SINGH

Sarita filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 793 of 2024 seeking to shift the pending suit against Omveer Singh to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The High Court observed that the application was not prosecuted. Consequently, the court …

HARISH CHANDRA MISHRA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the State to release two plots of land allotted for an OPEC Hospital or, alternatively, to acquire the land under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation, and Resettlement Act, 2013 with …

SMT POONAM VISHWAKARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Poonam Vishwakarma, who acquired rights over land that had already been acquired by the State of Uttar Pradesh under the National Highways Act, 1956 for a Ring Road, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus for compensation or possession of the land and for a decision on her …

KULDEEP MISHRA AND 4 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking interference with the trial court's order that referred the matter to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The High Court noted that the mediation report dated 30.05.2025 showed that mediation was completed but no …

AAZADversusSTATE OF U.P.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aazad, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 85, 64(1), 351(2) and 115(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication and pointing to a delayed FIR and a medical report that noted …

SMT. POOJAversusSRI NEERAJ VERMA

Smt. Pooja filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad against Sri Neeraj Verma. The applicant was represented by counsel Pramod Kumar, while no counsel appeared for the opposite party. The court noted that no appearance was made by the applicant to press the …

VISHNU GURJARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Vishnu Gurjar filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 36177 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant were Ayush Mishra and Prabha Shanker Mishra, while the State of U.P. was represented by Kartikey Singh and G.A. The court noted that the list had been revised …

SMT. SIMIRITI DEVIversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Simiriti Devi, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 29 June 2019 issued by the Tehsildar of Sadar, Gorakhpur, in mutation proceedings. The petition sought judicial interference with the Tehsildar's order. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, raised …

RAHUL ALIAS RAKESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Rahul alias Rakesh filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A‑1 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire proceedings of a Sessions case involving offences under the Indian Penal …

SHIV ACHALversusHINDALCO INDUSTRIES LTD AND 3 OTHERS

Shiv Achal, claiming ownership of a 0.24‑hectare plot in Jokahi village, challenged a decree passed in 2013 that declared Hindalco Industries and others as owners. An appeal filed in 2014 was dismissed for non‑appearance on 20 September 2023, and his subsequent application under Order 41 Rule 19 CPC …

RAKESH KUMAR SHARMA @ PRASADI AND 2 OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, seeking relief. The court noted that the matter had been referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, where the applicants failed to comply with the order to deposit money, yet they continued to enjoy an …

CHANDRA SHEKHAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Chandra Shekhar Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the application. The court considered the …

DEEPAK MUKHERJEEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Deepak Mukherjee, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bihar Negotiable Settlement Scheme seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 4157 of 2013) relating to offences under IPC sections 467, 468, 471 and 420. The parties had reached a compromise on 18 September 2025, …

MOHD. YASEEN MIYA @ RAHAT ALIversusFASHEEH MOHAMMAD KHAN @ GUDDU

The petition filed by Mohd. Yaseen Miya @ Rahat Ali under Article 227 was not pursued by the petitioner. The court observed that there was no appearance or action taken to press the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated. No …

KAMLESHWARI SINGH AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ No. 38399 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to pursue the petition. The court noted the absence of any representation and consequently dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim …

SURAJ HARIJANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Suraj Harijan filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 11244 of 2023) instituted against him for offences under Sections 376, 452 and 506 of the IPC. He contended that the FIR was originally lodged for offences under Sections 452 and 354, …

PAWAN KUMAR GUPTA ALIAS YOGENDRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Pawan Kumar Gupta and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a criminal proceeding (Complaint Case No. 766 of 2021) instituted under Section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. They did not press the merits of the quash petition …

PRASHANT CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Prashant Chauhan, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 19 of 2024) involving alleged siphoning of Rs 57,89,776. The applicant contended that he was falsely …

ASHOK KUMARversusDISTRICT JUDGE, DISTRICT BIJNOR AND ANOTHER

Ashok Kumar obtained an acquittal from the District Judge, Bijnor, and subsequently received a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the police to obtain a passport. He filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 25436 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking further relief. The petitioners, …

NAQSAB ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Naqsab Ali filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel, Santosh Kumar Upadhyay, moved the court for withdrawal of the writ petition. The court considered the request and, …

SHAHNAWAJ @ SERAJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shahnawaj @ Seraj, who was arrested under Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act in connection with Crime No. 165 of 2025. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false implication, and argued lack of credible evidence, while the State opposed …

RAJUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Raju filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others to cancel a fisheries lease on public utility land (Pokhari) of Araji No.780 (0.5260 hectare) and to restrain any interference by respondents. The respondents, through standing counsel, raised a …

SMT SIMRAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt. Simran and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 25594 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners moved that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn. The Court accepted the prayer and ordered the petition dismissed as …

AMINAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Amina, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief while a related complaint filed by her on 5 July 2025 before Respondent No.2 was still pending. The petitioner argued that the pending complaint should be decided before the writ petition proceeds. The court …

VIKAS DUTT SHARMA AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking interference with ongoing trial court proceedings under Sections 244 and 246 CrPC. The High Court examined the record and noted that the trial court proceedings were at an advanced stage with witness …

MANIRAM PATEL ALIAS MANIRAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Maniram Patel filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order dated 29‑08‑2024 that required him to pay Rs 10,000 per month to his wife and Rs 4,000 each to their two minor children under section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He argued that his wife, an Anganwadi worker earning Rs …

JITENDRA KUMAR RAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, a constable, challenged two lower court orders that dismissed his application under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, alleging that the investigating officer had falsely recorded his statement as being taken in Ghazipur while he was posted in Bhadohi. He contended that …

SUHAILversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Suhail, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing and raping a 15‑year‑old girl. The prosecution relied on the victim’s statement and CCTV footage showing …

PAWAN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pawan Kumar, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 64 and 87 of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence in Kushi Nagar. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS Act suggested consent, as she …

MUNAWWAR HASAN MANSOORIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Munawwar Hasan Mansoori applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 154 of 2025) involving offences under Section 65(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 5(M) and 6 of the POCSO Act, with two child victims, one of whom sustained injuries. The applicant’s counsel failed to appear on multiple listed …

RAVI @ LUKKAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravi @ Lukka in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 70(2), 127(2), 137(2), 351(2) of the IPC and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, pointing to discrepancies in the collection and sealing of the …

PRIYANSHU JAISAWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed by Priyanshu Jaisawal in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 41200 of 2025. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was falsely implicated, and that key prosecution witnesses had turned hostile after …

PUSPENDRA ALIAS ARUN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Puspendra alias Arun Kumar, who was charged under Sections 115(2), 351(2) of the same Act and Sections 5(M)/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged penetrative sexual assault on a …

RAMLAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Ramlal and two others, charged under IPC sections 323, 324, 328 and 308, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of the charge sheet, summons and the entire session proceedings. During hearing, the applicants' counsel indicated that they would surrender within …

ANURAG YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Anurag Yadav and another appealed a trial court order that directed the husband to pay Rs.4,000 as house rent, Rs.6,000 as monthly maintenance and Rs.2 lakh as compensation under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The husband contended that he earned only Rs.450 per day, was …

VIKASversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Vikas filed a bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 45291 of 2024, seeking release on bail in Crime No. 409 of 2024, which involved charges under Sections 364-A, 302, 201, 147 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant's counsel, Kapil Tyagi, informed the court …

ALOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner Alok Kumar filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner informed the Court that, due to subsequent developments, he no longer wished to pursue the petition and requested its dismissal as ‘not pressed’. The Court considered the petitioner's …

MUSHARRAFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Musharraf was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 218 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 137(2), 64(2), 352, 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing to a 17‑hour delay in filing the FIR …

PRADEEP KUMAR AGARWAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Pradeep Kumar Agarwal and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal case No 2052/2019, which involved offences under Sections 307, 406, 323, 504, 506 and 427 IPC. They claimed they were falsely implicated and that the underlying …

PRADEEP KUMAR AGRAWAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal case No.13 of 2018 (Crime No.309 of 2017) involving offences under Sections 147, 307, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicants claimed that they had reached an amicable compromise with the opposite party and …

MAJIBULLAHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Majibullah applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.131 of 2025) alleging offences under the Indian Penal Code, the POCSO Act and the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religion Conversion Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, the FIR was filed five days after the …

PAWAN THAKURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Pawan Thakur, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking a stay and quash of the criminal case (Crime No. 0090) pending before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, which involved offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 406, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the …

OM PRAKASH CHAUHANversusASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA

The petitioner, Om Prakash Chauhan, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Special Judicial Magistrate-II, Kanpur Nagar, to decide a complaint (Case No. 81171 of 2021) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petition argued for an expeditious disposal of …

SAVITA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Savita and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case filed under various IPC and CLA provisions. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel withdrew all prayers except the request to …

SONU ALIAS MOHD IRFAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants, Sonu alias Mohd Irfan and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 885 of 2014) arising from alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 324, 504 and 307. They claimed innocence and asserted that the dispute with …

SURAJ PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Suraj Prasad was arrested in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences. The applicant contended that the alleged victim, a 15‑year‑old girl, was a consenting party, that there was no medical evidence to …

MOHAMMAD AARSHADversusSTATE OF U.P.

Mohammad Aarshad was charged under Sections 69 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly establishing a relationship with a 20‑year‑old woman by a false promise of marriage and later refusing to marry. He applied for bail during the pendency of the trial. The prosecution contended that he …

NAVI ULLAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Navi Ulla who was charged under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed false …

SAMIR KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Samir Khan in a case under Sections 64(2)(m) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that the FIR was delayed by 13 days, the victim was a consenting party, and there was no evidence of indecent material or blackmail. The State …

RAM KISHAN RAIKWAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 352, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They argued that the matrimonial …

SARIK ALIAS SHARIQversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sarik alias Shariq, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual activity with a 17‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was delayed, …

HASHIMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Hashim, sought bail in a criminal case under Sections 78, 137(2), 65(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication. The counsel highlighted a two‑day delay in filing the FIR, absence of medical evidence, and argued that the alleged …

NAGESH UPADHYAY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash Special Session Trial No. 474 of 2024, wherein they were summoned under various IPC offences. They asserted that a compromise between the parties was entered on 4 August 2025 and verified by the …

MAKKHAN ALIAS MAKHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Makkhan, a married man, was arrested in a case alleging that he eloped with a 17‑year‑old girl who claimed to love him. The FIR, filed four days after the alleged disappearance, accused him of offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The …

SARDARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Sardar was charged under Sections 333, 87, 69, 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged offences arising from an incident at Banpur, Lalitpur. The victim, a 21‑year‑old woman, testified that she had travelled with the applicant voluntarily and gave no indication of …

SHISHU KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Shishu Kumar, was arrested in a case (Crime No.267 of 2025) alleging that he had established a physical relationship with a 30‑year‑old woman by falsely promising marriage and later reneged, invoking Sections 69 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant pleaded innocence, …

SHAHBAZ AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case arising from offences under Sections 191(2), 190, 109(1), 352 and 118(1) of the B.N.S. on the ground that the dispute had been settled by compromise between …

ROHAN @ RITIKversusSTATE OF U.P.

Rohan @ Ritik was charged under Sections 123, 75, 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 66(C), 67 of the Income Tax Act for allegedly spiking a victim's water, raping her, recording the act on video and posting it on social media. The applicant sought bail, arguing the FIR was delayed, the victim was a …

ROHIT @ MANISH @ MOHITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Rohit @ Manish @ Mohit in a criminal case (Crime No. 335 of 2025) involving serious offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighting discrepancies in the collection and sealing of the victim’s …