Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 8001–8200
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rajneesh Dwivedi, who was arrested in a NDPS case for allegedly transporting 69.51 kg of ganja. The applicant argued that the seizure did not comply with mandatory …
Petitioners Badale Singh and four others filed Writ Petition No. 44882 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. During the hearing, the petitioners, through counsel Akshara Rai and Sujeet Kumar Rai, expressed a desire to withdraw the petition …
Munna Singh filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking permission to withdraw securities he had furnished in favor of the accused, Rajendra Singh, in a criminal appeal. The appeal pertained to a case involving offences under Sections 452, 354Kha, 504, 506 IPC, the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and related criminal proceedings, alleging that the dispute with the State had been settled by compromise. The State did not object to the filing of a compromise deed before the trial court. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case involving alleged offences under sections 109(1), 115(2), 352 and 117(2) of the B.N.S. They asserted that they and the victims had reached an amicable …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 42942 of 2025) on the ground that they had reached a compromise with the opposite party. The court noted that the trial court is the proper forum to determine the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 42076 of 2025) on the ground that they had reached a compromise with the opposite party. The State and the opposite party did not contest the existence of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Charge Sheet No. 01 of 2018) in Session Case No. 954 of 2022, alleging that they had reached an amicable compromise with the State. The State’s learned A.G.A. expressed no objection to …
Arvind Kumar Verma filed Writ Petition (A) No. 1727 of 2013 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. The petition was to be heard before a bench headed by Hon'ble Justice Rajnish Kumar. No representative of the petitioner appeared to press the petition, and no request for adjournment was …
The appellants were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for offences under IPC sections 308, 325 and 504 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. They filed a criminal appeal under Section 374(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking reversal of the conviction. While the appeal was pending, …
The applicants Jayveer Singh, Nanhu and Lal Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash an order dated 25‑11‑2025 in Session Trial Case No.850 of 2022 (Ramkumar v. Jayveer Singh), which involved charges under IPC sections 452, 354, 323, 504, 506, POCSO Act sections …
Vijay Kumar filed a revision challenging the Family Court's order granting maintenance to Neetu Yadav and her son under Section 125 of the CrPC. Kumar contended that Neetu was never his wife, that their engagement was cancelled, and that she later married another man, Pramod Kumar Yadav, who is the …
Arjun Pal was charged under Sections 64, 333, 351(2) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly raping a 14‑year‑old girl, the informant's daughter, on 17 March 2025. The applicant pleaded innocence, arguing that the FIR was delayed, the victim had consented as per her statement …
The revisionist, Rangesh Kumar, challenged a Family Court order that required him to pay monthly maintenance to his wife and three children under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He argued that his wife left voluntarily, he was financially strained due to his father's medical expenses, …
Mukesh Maurya appealed a maintenance order passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Jaunpur, which required him to pay Rs.3,000 per month to his wife (opposite party no.2) and Rs.1,000 per month to his minor son (opposite party no.3) under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure …
The applicants sought to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings filed under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 191(2), 110, 117(2) and 324(4) of the B.N.S. on the ground that they were falsely implicated in a civil dispute and that the investigation was defective. The State argued that the FIR, …
Appellant No.1 (Mahanath Singh @ Inder Deo) and Appellant No.2 (Vishwanath @ Duryodhan Singh) filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. While the appeal was pending, both appellants died, as reported by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Basti. The court, noting the death of the parties, …
The appellant K.U.M.S. filed a criminal appeal against respondent Sabbir Ahmad. No counsel appeared for the appellant and the respondent's counsel was also absent, though the State's counsel was present. A compliance affidavit submitted by the SP of Bijnor indicated that the respondent had died on 6 …
The petitioner, Sukhai, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The court had previously deferred the matter on 21 April 2026 because the petitioner had not filed a vakalatnama and the undelivered cover was not returned. On the date of hearing, no representative of the petitioner …
The case arose from a violent incident on 14‑02‑1985 in Mainpuri where a group of accused, led by Havaldar Singh, attacked Kunji Lal, his companions and killed Mulaim Singh by firing guns. Kunji Lal, an injured eyewitness and brother of the deceased, gave oral information that led to an FIR and …
The appellant Nand Kishore appealed against the acquittal of the respondents in a complaint under Sections 494 and 109 of the IPC by the 1st Additional Munsif Magistrate, Aligarh. No counsel appeared for the appellant during the revised call. The appellant died, and his legal heirs declined to …
The appellant was convicted under Sections 392 and 412 IPC for a robbery alleged to have occurred on 28 June 1982, based on recovery of an anklet and identification in a parade. The trial court sentenced him to four years’ rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the appellant, now 67, contended that the …
The appellants, Harnam Singh and Kunwar Singh, filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, both appellants passed away—Kunwar Singh on 2 February 2022 and Harnam Singh on 6 December 2025. The court received an official report confirming their deaths. …
The appellant Bashiullah @ Matru was convicted by the Sessions Court for robbery (Section 393 read with Section 398 IPC) and attempt to murder (Section 307 IPC) and sentenced to seven years' rigorous imprisonment for the robbery and five years for the attempt, to run concurrently. The appellant …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 7126 of 2018, Crime No. 51 of 2019) arising under Sections 323, 504, 506, 406 and 342 of the IPC. The trial court had earlier ordered the parties to file a …
The appellant husband appealed against a trial court order that granted his wife maintenance of Rs.5,000 per month under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, in addition to an existing Rs.3,000 per month awarded under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The husband argued that the total …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed against the accused. The Court noted that once a …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ‑B No. 16271 of 1983) before the Allahabad High Court. On the hearing date, none of the petitioners appeared, while counsel for the respondents was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioners and, after hearing the respondent’s counsel, …
The appellant Surendra Kumar was convicted by a Sessions Judge in 1983 for attempting murder under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the IPC, receiving seven years of rigorous imprisonment for shooting an injured person in the eye. He appealed, arguing that the incident occurred 45 years earlier, …
Petitioner Jitendra Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 925 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and three others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the charge sheet had already been filed and that no further judicial order was …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim …
Petitioners Smt. Roshani and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, noting the existence …
Petitioners Firasat Shah and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State of U.P. submitted that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that once a …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim …
Petitioners Mohd. Hamid and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Advocate General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The …
Mohit Sharma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 3014 of 2022) seeking bail. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while counsel for the State of U.P. and another party were present. The court noted the absence of representation for the applicant and …
The applicant sought relief under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to set aside an ex‑parte order dated 16‑10‑2020 passed by the Municipal Corporation of Meerjapur under Sections 145 and 146 of the CrPC, which had withdrawn an earlier attachment order on a disputed house. The dispute arose …
The petitioner, Mohammad Hanif, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …
Ashok Kumar Jain and another were appointed as short‑term teachers in a minority school, but their appointments were disapproved by the District Inspector of Schools. They filed a writ petition challenging the Deputy Director of Education’s order that rejected their representation, arguing that the …
Mukesh Kumar Raikawar was appointed to a short‑term vacancy, but the appointment was cancelled by an order dated 30‑April‑2002. He filed a writ petition in 2002 challenging the cancellation, and the court stayed the order on 22‑Nov‑2002, allowing him to continue in service. The petition was later …
The applicants Chand, Mausin, Rashid and Mohd. Nazim filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 31.08.2021 passed by the Special Court under the POCSO Act and to stay further proceedings. The application was initially filed for Chand, and …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.595/9 of 2017) arising from offences under Sections 376‑D and 506 IPC. The court examined the prayer and, instead of granting a quash, directed that if the …
The applicants (Nafis and two others) filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No.628/9 of 2017 pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarnagar, arising from offences under Sections 376‑D and 506 IPC. They also requested that, if they …
The petitioners, Jabar Singh and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court …
The petitioner, a professor in the Orthopaedics department of Banaras Hindu University (B.H.U.), claimed entitlement to act as Head of Department (HOD) under the university's rotation policy. The Vice Chancellor had earlier appointed the Dean of the Faculty of Modern Medicine as interim HOD by order …
Manju Singh filed a writ petition challenging an order passed by the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The petitioners, represented by Senior Advocate Shantanu Khare and counsel Ashok Khare with Mohd. Yaseen, argued that the impugned order was contrary to a precedent set by a coordinate …
The petitioner, a constable of the CRPF who had acquired substantive status, was compelled to resign in December 2000 to obtain leave for his ailing wife. He applied to withdraw his resignation on 17 January 2001, before the resignation became effective on 25 January 2001, and was subsequently …
Petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, they filed a withdrawal application, citing the facts stated therein. The State and other respondents did not object to the withdrawal. The court allowed the withdrawal application, dismissed the writ petition as …
The applicants Dhyanpal and six others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 354 of 2017, which involved offences under Sections 394, 397 and 427 of the IPC. The High Court had earlier directed the …
The petitioner, Rajeev Agrawal, sought to quash a summoning order dated 17‑11‑2022 and a revisional order dated 07‑07‑2023 in a criminal complaint alleging assault, criminal intimidation and robbery, arguing that the allegations were false, the investigation report cleared him, and the case stemmed …
The applicant, Jamunanand, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 175 of 2025) arising under Sections 74 and 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The application was filed in the High Court of Judicature …
The appellant, a bus passenger injured in a truck collision, challenged the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of Rs.1,89,834, arguing that the quantum of compensation was inadequately calculated and that the insurance company, not the truck owner, should bear liability. The Tribunal had based …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Dr. Ramkesh Yadav in a criminal case (Crime No. 0525 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 64, 333 and 351(3) IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that the FIR was lodged after a seven‑month delay without …
Petitioner Dav Raj filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to pay him the minimum regular pay as per a 2002 Government Order and a 2010 Order, and to regularize his Group D service, relying on a Supreme Court decision in State of U.P. v. Putti Lal. The State …
The petitioner, Ram Babu, a tractor driver appointed in 2000, filed a writ petition seeking regularisation and a minimum pay‑scale. He had continuously served without break and was granted successive minimum pay‑scales in 2012 (Rs. 6050), 2011 (Rs. 7000) and 2023 (Rs. 18,000) along with arrears. The …
The petitioner, Ram Dev, a daily wager in the Forest Department since 1976, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to pay him the minimum salary applicable to Class‑IV employees in Uttar Pradesh. The respondents contended that daily labourers are not entitled to minimum …
Arjun applied for bail in a criminal case involving offences under sections 363, 368, 376(d)(a), 506 of the IPC and sections 5(g)/6 of the POCSO Act. This was his second bail application; the first was dismissed in July 2021. Counsel argued that the trial had already concluded, rendering the bail …
Petitioners Kedar Nath and Shiv Govind, employed as Class IV workers in the Uttar Pradesh Forest Department, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to pay them the minimum pay scale applicable to their posts and to decide on their representation. The State, through its …
Petitioner Shree Pal filed a writ petition seeking to be placed on a minimum pay scale. The State of U.P., through its Additional Chief Standing Counsel, informed the court that the petitioner had already been regularized and was receiving the regular pay scale, rendering the relief sought moot. …
The revision petition filed by a juvenile (the revisionist) sought relief in a criminal matter before the High Court of Allahabad. The revisionist, through counsel Gulafsha, requested that the revision be withdrawn because the juvenile had already confessed before the Juvenile Justice Board, …
The petitioners Arvind Kumar Shukla, Pawan Kumar Tiwari and Ramesh Chandra Yadav challenged the cancellation of their appointments by the District Inspector of Schools (DIOS) in 1999, arguing that a stay order on the termination prevented any further termination. The court noted that the interim …
The applicant, Moharram @ Mohammad Husain, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 744 of 2017) involving offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376(2)(i), 376(D), 372, 373 and sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act. He argued that he was never charge‑sheeted, that the victim had consented, he had no prior …
The petitioner, Manisha @ Rita, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …
The petitioners Vimal Kumar and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that the charge-sheet had already been filed, as …
The petitioner sought to quash the trial court’s order under Section 528 of the CrPC granting bail to the accused in a case involving alleged dowry death. The facts involved the suicide of a daughter‑in‑law shortly after her marriage, with the prosecution alleging dowry harassment and filing charges …
The petitioner, Prem Narain Shukla, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18 April 1998 issued by the District Inspector of Schools, Varanasi, which rejected his claim for appointment. The petition sought relief against the administrative decision but no interim order was granted and …
The petition filed by Akhilesh Rana challenged an order dated 27 June 2015 issued by the District Inspector of Schools, Ghaziabad, on the ground that the appellate authority had not properly considered the representation filed on 11 May 2015, particularly the points raised in paragraph 5(2) and (3). …
Arvind Kumar Shukla and another filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 54643 of 2017) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the District Inspector of Schools, Jaunpur and four other respondents. The petitioners were represented by counsel Adarsh Singh, Babu Ram Yadav and Indra Raj …
Santosh Kumar Srivastava and another filed a writ petition in 1998 challenging orders dated 7 January 1998 and 25 September 1997 that denied them employee status and stopped their salary under the Uttar Pradesh State University Act, 1973. The High Court initially stayed the salary stoppage and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravi Prakash Jha in a case involving alleged cheating of Rs. 10 lakh. The applicant claimed the allegations were false and that a prior police inquiry in 2023 found no proof of the money being given, resulting in no FIR at that time; the FIR was …
In a criminal miscellaneous writ petition filed by Vimal S Lal, the petitioner sought relief despite a charge sheet having been submitted. The petitioner’s counsel argued that no further order was necessary after the charge sheet filing. The respondents did not contest this position. The Court …
The applicants filed a CrPC Section 482 application seeking to quash the summons and criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 1999 of 2023) filed by Jyoti Devi under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 376 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter had been referred to the Court’s Mediation and Conciliation …
The petitioner, Kiran, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the Court that the police had already submitted a charge sheet after completing the investigation. The …
The appellant, Dilip, filed a criminal appeal (No. 1781 of 2018) against the State of U.P. but failed to appear before the Allahabad High Court despite having three counsels on record. The court repeatedly listed the matter, directed notices to the appellant, and sought his willingness to be …
The petitioner, Mayank Rawat, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings after a charge sheet was filed. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the submission of the charge sheet rendered any further judicial intervention unnecessary. The respondents, the State of U.P. …
Azad Kumar Bhati filed an arbitration application before the Allahabad High Court seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator. The opposite party, Managing Director of Noida Power Company Ltd, objected, alleging that the agreement annexed to the application was forged and differed from an earlier …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Utkarsh Jaiswal, who is charged under IPC sections 105, 336(2), 336(3), 340(2), 87 and 61(2) BNS for an alleged offence at a victim's residence. The applicant argued that the mere presence in the room does not prove guilt, highlighted that …
Petitioners Anjana Jadaun and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition sought relief, but the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that a final report in the matter had already been submitted and no further order was necessary. The court …
The petitioners were appointed to short‑term vacancies as Assistant Teachers under a resolution dated 18‑08‑1997, but the District Inspector of Schools (D.I.O.S.) disapproved their appointments on 02‑02‑2000, citing a state‑wide ban on such appointments. The High Court issued an interim order …
The applicant, Fakeer Chand, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No. 322 of 2023) involving alleged offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 308 of the IPC. He claimed innocence, alleging false implication and that a charge sheet had already been filed against …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shubham, accused under IPC Section 409 for alleged fraud of Rs. 9,53,714. The applicant argued innocence, lack of evidence, and that he had been in custody for over 60 days since the trial commenced, invoking Section 437(6) of the CrPC (referred …
The High Court considered a criminal revision filed by Juvenile "A" seeking to quash the Special Judge's order denying bail under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. The revisionist argued that he is a juvenile entitled to bail unless reasonable grounds under Section 12 …
Petitioner Braham Dev Upadhyay filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. He appeared in person and later expressed his desire to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request for withdrawal. No substantive issues were raised regarding the merits of the petition. The Court …
The applicant, Tariq Ansari, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.248 of 2024) involving charges under IPC Section 333, Section 65(2) of the B.N.S., and Sections 5M and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the victim’s statement contained material contradictions, that the alleged …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No party appeared to argue the application, though counsel for one opposite party was present. The court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. Consequently, the interim order previously …
The applicants, Kush Pratap and another, filed a civil contempt application (No. 2151 of 2021) before the Allahabad High Court alleging non‑compliance with an order of the writ court. The counsel for the applicants, Sr. Advocate Siddharth Khare, appeared before the bench and was assisted by Advocate …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order dated 12‑10‑2023 and the entire criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 13004 of 2023) arising from allegations of physical and mental torture under IPC sections 498A, 323, 506 and D.P. …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained a criminal revision filed by a minor seeking to quash the Juvenile Justice Board and Special Judge's orders that denied bail. The revisionist argued that under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 there were no …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an FIR registered on 20-04-2022 under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that the allegations disclose a cognizable offence. …
The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash a criminal complaint (Case No. 226 of 2020) filed under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High Court noted that the matter had been referred to mediation, which failed, and that the issues …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 1766 of 2017) involving Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The dispute arose from a matrimonial disagreement and the parties had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Umesh Kesharvani in a criminal case (Crime No. 92 of 2025) involving alleged cheating, fraud and forgery under sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The applicant claimed he was a bona‑fide purchaser of the informant’s property and that the …
The appellant Mahipal was convicted by the Sessions Court for murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution alleged that Mamta, the deceased, was killed by her in‑laws and husband over dowry demands, presenting witnesses who described throttling and a ligature …
The appellant, Jai Ram Das, claimed possession of a brick‑kiln premises under a registered lease dated 22‑Nov‑2010, which he alleged was extended by subsequent payments up to 21‑May‑2026. He filed an injunction to restrain the respondents from evicting him, but the trial court rejected the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against potential arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ petition …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Tanmay Bandhopadhyay and Subhmay Banerjee in a criminal case (Crime No. 368 of 2023) alleging cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery and criminal conspiracy under IPC sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120B. The applicants, directors of a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajeet Singh alias Lalu alias Lambu, who is charged under Sections 305A, 331(4) and 317(5) of the BNS for alleged theft and dealing in stolen property. The applicant contended that the allegations are false, that the stolen articles recovered from …
Ram Kumar filed a civil contempt application (No. 1194 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court against Sri Naveen Khandelwal and Prabhagiya Vanadhikari, alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. The applicant was represented by counsel Ramendra Kumar Shukla, who informed the Court that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sanjeet Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a case under Section 304(2) of the BNS for allegedly snatching a golden chain. The applicant contended that the allegations were false and that his inclusion as an accused was based solely on the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aftab @ Gulab, accused of multiple offences including assault under several sections of the BNS. The applicant argued that he has no prior criminal record and that a co-accused, Wajid Ali, had already been released on bail by a coordinate bench. …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the case. The High Court observed that once a …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The petition was heard in the revised list with no petitioner present, while the State's learned AGA appeared. The court noted that the charge-sheet in the case had already been filed, as per a report …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court …
The petitioner Sanjay Ram filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 11‑05‑2026 from the Legal Cell of the Uttar …
Capital Electech Pvt. Ltd. filed an application under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, seeking relief against Purvanchal Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. and others. The applicant claimed a monetary amount, but the amount was subsequently paid to it. Counsel for the applicant informed …
Mahesh Chandra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State of U.P. and two others had filed a charge sheet, but the court was uncertain whether cognizance of the charge sheet had been taken by the trial court. The petitioners sought relief to prevent …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …
The petitioner, Harikesh Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 11 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of the Uttar …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court noted that the filing of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed against the accused. The Court noted that once a …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the existence of an …
In Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 9471 of 2022, the petitioners Vikas Sharma and another sought relief to prevent their arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken …
Nanhe Babu filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted that an …
The petitioner Rohitas filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the possibility of his arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed, but it was unclear whether the court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in …
The applicants filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No. 950 of 2006, which stemmed from an FIR alleging offences under Sections 323, 326, 307, 504 and 506 IPC. The trial court verified that the parties had entered into a written compromise, and the key prosecution …
The petitioners, Smt. Arti @ Shivani and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioner, Anurag Chaudhary, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from potential arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, noting the …
The petitioner, Devyendu Rai, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 9364 of 2022 before the High Court of Allahabad seeking relief against the State of U.P. and three others. The petitioner’s counsel, Prem Narayan Rai, was not present before the bench. The court observed that no interim …
The petitioner, Nuzul Akhtar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 11 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of the Uttar …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet in the matter had already been filed …
The petitioners, Gayatri Devi and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from potential arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ankit Johari and Shiva Johri, who were later made accused in a GST fraud case despite not being named in the FIR. The applicants contended that they merely performed data‑entry work for GST registrations, received no money, and did not …
The petitioner, a minor named Sabir Ali, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High …
The petitioners, Padamveer Singh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, appeared before the court. The court noted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated …
The petitioner, Sanjay Mishra, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The court, noting the petition was no longer viable, consigned the petition to …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by …
The petitioner, Akanksha Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 11 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court observed that …
The petitioner, Sandeep Tiwari, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioners, Smt. Pooja and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the …
Praveesh Kuzhipally filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR registered against him. The State of Uttar Pradesh and four others filed a charge‑sheet, and the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police confirmed its filing on 11‑May‑2026. The …
The petitioner, Mohd. Tariq, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 11 May 2026 from the Director General of …
Petitioners Dinesh Maurya and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been …
The petitioners, Umesh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the …
The petitioners Arjun Prasad and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the police had already …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director …
Petitioners Kulvinder Singh and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the continuation of proceedings against them. They contended that the charge sheet had already been submitted and therefore no further judicial intervention was …
The petitioners, Danish and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a …
The petitioners, Wasim and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that …
Petitioners Radhacharan and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted …
The petitioners, Robin Kumar and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet in the matter had already been filed. The Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that once a …
The petitioners, Dhirendra Yadav and seven others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that …
The petitioner Vishant Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised list with no petitioner present, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The court noted that the charge-sheet had already been …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioners, Shivji Rajbhar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the police had …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, through its Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the police. The Court noted that the …
The petitioners, Shashi Dubey and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that the charge‑sheet in the matter had already …
Petitioners Poonam Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already …
The petitioners, Ashraf alias Shekhu, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the …
The petitioner, Himanshu Triwedi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 11 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of the Uttar …
Petitioner Rajpati Yadav filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16‑06‑2022. The petitioner relied on a prior decision of a coordinate bench in Tej Pal Singh v. State of U.P. & Ors (2024) which had been allowed with a direction to issue a fresh regularisation order in accordance with the …
Petitioner Sanjay Tyagi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State of U.P. submitted a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the uncertainty and, considering the interim …
The petitioner, Nawab Noor, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 11 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of the Uttar …
Firoz Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State of U.P. submitted a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ petition and …
Munesh Sharma filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Siddarth Jaiswal, was not present, and no interim relief had been ordered. The court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, Mohammad Zameer alias Babu Media, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 9360 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Bipin Kumar Tripathi, was not present at the hearing. No interim order had been passed in the proceedings. The Court observed that …
The petitioners, Furkan and 13 others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. …
The petitioner, Mohd. Fahim, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High …
The petitioners filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 9379 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two other respondents. The petitioners’ counsel, Rahul Mishra and Sanjay Kumar Pandey, were not present when the matter was listed. No interim …
Petitioners Anchal Patwa and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The learned Additional Government Advocate confirmed the filing of …
Bihari Lal Sharma filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State of Uttar Pradesh submitted that a charge sheet had been filed, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in …
Petitioners Meeta Yadav and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Advocate General, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from potential arrest. The State's Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in …
Petitioners Banshi Das and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the …
Petitioners Banshi Brijmohan Das and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the …
Petitioner Pradeep Gangwar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State of U.P. submitted a charge sheet, but the court was uncertain whether cognizance of the police report had been taken. The learned Attorney General informed the bench of the charge sheet …
Petitioners Abdul Sattar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State of Uttar Pradesh and two others, as respondents, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the …
Mushahid and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging their potential arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …
Smt. Shailbala filed an appeal before the Allahabad High Court, which was later withdrawn by the appellant. The appellant, through counsel, filed a withdrawal application seeking to discontinue the appeal. The court considered the request and, for the reasons stated in the application, permitted the …
The petitioner Binni filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the prospect of arrest after a charge sheet was filed by the investigating officer. The State, represented by the Advocate General, indicated that while the charge sheet had been submitted, it was unclear whether the trial …
Petitioners Smt. Ruksana and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …
Petitioner Sonu Sharma filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the prospect of his arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The …
The petitioners, represented by counsel Dharmendra Kumar and Ganga Bhushan Mishra, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by G.A., informed the Court that a charge sheet had already been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had …
The petitioners, Kamil Ahmad and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from potential arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken …
Petitioners Rauf Pahalwan and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Case No. 23876 of 2023) arising from an FIR and charge‑sheet under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504 and the Dowry Prohibition Act (sections 3 and 4). The dispute was matrimonial in nature and the …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the …
The petitioners Pramila (alias Parmila) filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition was pending before the Allahabad High Court. The Court observed that the petition had not been prosecuted and therefore could not …
Petitioner Praveen Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 31.01.2026 registered under Sections 318(4), 351(2), 336, 338 and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought relief and later requested an adjournment to enable repayment of a disputed amount to …
Petitioner Rajendra Prasad Upadhyay filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the prospect of his arrest. The State of U.P. submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the existence …
The petitioners, Smt. Anita Devi and another, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 5480 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners despite being listed in the cause list, and the petitioners themselves were absent. The respondents' counsel, …
The applicant, Jai Prakash Yadav, sought anticipatory bail under CrPC Section 482 in a case involving alleged cheating under IPC Sections 140(1), 127(2), 351(3), 352 and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court had earlier granted interim anticipatory bail on 17‑03‑2026, which …
