The appellants Lalu Tiwari alias Kamlakant and three others filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under IPC sections 323, 354, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(d)(dha). The trial …
Shiv Prasad Mishra applied for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in a case where 364.4 kg of ganja was seized from a truck and he was found sitting beside the driver, though no contraband was recovered from his conscious possession. The prosecution argued the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 7637 of 2023, which involved charges under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging a matrimonial dispute. The parties had entered into a …
The petitioners, Smt Poonam Kumari and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioners on the revised call. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The dismissal was ordered by a bench comprising Hon'ble Atul …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Pintu Yadav, who has been in custody since December 2022 for alleged murder, attempt to murder and criminal conspiracy under Sections 302, 201 and 120B IPC. The applicant argued that the trial had been delayed for over three years, with …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shivam Yadav, who was charged with offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 333, 110 and 105 of the same Act for the alleged murder of Saraswati Devi. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Byas Muni Yadav, who is accused in Crime No.555 of 2024 for offences including assault causing grievous injury and death of Saraswati Devi. The applicant claimed …
The revision petition No. 6734 of 2025 was filed by Sher Singh against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petition was presented before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Court No. 86, before Hon'ble Justice Subhash Chandra Sharma. Counsel for the petitioner were Shweta …
The petitioner, Sanjay Singh, filed a writ petition seeking the High Court to enforce an order dated 16‑10‑2021 passed by the Tehsildar (Judicial) in a revenue suit under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code. He claimed to be an inhabitant of the village concerned and asked the Court to compel …
The petitioner, Vinod Kant, sought a writ of certiorari to quash an order dated 05‑09‑2025 that withdrew his personal Gunner Security, and a writ of mandamus to compel the State to restore the security. He alleged that the court had failed to consider an intelligence report dated 29‑10‑2022 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rohit Kumar in a criminal case (Crime No. 332 of 2025) under Sections 309(6) and 117(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication and lack of credible evidence, while the State opposed bail. The court, …
The petitioner, Smt. Anita Devi, challenged two orders: the Chief Judicial Magistrate’s dismissal of her protest petition on 06.06.2023 and the Sessions Judge’s affirmation of that dismissal in a criminal revision on 01.03.2024. The protest petition arose from an FIR filed under Sections 147, 323, …
The petitioner, Bhupal Singh, was recommended for the post of Headmaster in a junior high school under the U.P. Basic Education Act, 1972, but his appointment was rejected because the selection process was completed after the deadline set by a Government Order dated 03.06.2016, which required …
Petitioner Raj Bahadur Yadav filed a criminal complaint under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code alleging that the respondent, an army personnel, had forged his age by obtaining two matriculation certificates ten years apart to secure army employment. The trial court and a revisional …
The applicant, Jas Karan Lal, filed a contempt application against the respondents, including the Divisional Forest Officer of Pilibhit Tiger Reserve, alleging non‑compliance with a writ order. The writ order required the respondent to pay the applicant a minimum salary of Rs.18,000 per month from 1 …
The revisionists Himanshu Singh Yadav and Sher Singh were charged under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and 304 for assaulting a person who later died from septicemia. They sought to quash the trial court’s order refusing their discharge application, arguing that the death was not a direct result of the …
The petitioner, Har Swaroop, claimed that his uncle fraudulently transferred property that was bequeathed to him under a will, and he sought criminal action under Section 156(3) of the CrPC to register an FIR. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate dismissed the complaint after treating it as a …
The petitioner Bindeshwari Prasad filed a writ petition (WRIT‑B No. 4910 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the relief sought had already been granted by the consolidation …
Shiv Shankar Pandey filed a writ petition (WRIT‑B No. 4806 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the relief sought had already been granted by the consolidation authorities, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Anurag Singh, who was arrested in connection with a property dispute case (Crime 223 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ashish Kashyap in a criminal case (Crime No. 424 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 306 and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR and recovered articles were fabricated, and sought …
The applicants, Sarthak Kaushik and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants even after a revised call, while the State's counsel was present. The court …
Petitioners Ajeet Saxena and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State of Uttar Pradesh, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted a counter‑affidavit stating that a charge sheet had already been filed in the case. …
The revisionist, Anshul Kushwaha, appealed a Family Court order granting interim maintenance of Rs.8,000 per month to his wife and Rs.4,000 to their minor daughter under Section 144 of the B.N.S.S. The revisionist argued that the marriage had broken down, he earned only Rs.10,000 a month as a …
The applicant, Rohit Soni, filed a second bail application in a case under IPC sections 333, 64(1) and 351(2) alleging sexual assault. He argued that the victim’s cross‑examination revealed contradictions, there was no medical evidence, and the doctor’s testimony was inconclusive, constituting a new …
Iqbal Ahmad filed a writ petition (WRIT C No. 1002920 of 2001) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the respondent's counsel, including the Additional CSC for the State, was present. The court observed that the petitioner had not …
The applicant, Ramesh Chandra Mishra, filed a miscellaneous review application (No. 103 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No party appeared before the court to pursue the matter, and the applicant showed no interest in prosecuting the case. The court noted the lack of …
The petitioners, Hitkari Kisan Inter College, filed a writ petition (Writ A No. 6824 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petition sought relief, but the Court found no sufficient grounds to grant the relief. …
The petitioner, Naveen Verma, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 7909 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petition was presented by counsel Vivek Kumar Singh, while the respondents were represented by Abhitab Kumar …
The petition under Article 227 challenged the lower court’s order rejecting an application for a hand‑writing expert report on a 2001 unregistered will that formed the basis of an earlier suit. The petitioners argued that the appellate court could still order such expert evidence under Section 45 of …
Petitioners Kamla Kant Ojha and three others filed Writ Petition (A) No. 7045 of 2017 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and ten others. The petition was listed but no petitioner counsel appeared to press the petition. The Standing Counsel for the State …
Birendra Kumar filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order dated 03.01.2025 passed by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Fatehpur, which directed him to pay Rs.4,000 per month to Seema Devi under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The revisionist contended …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance, summoning order and charge sheet in a case under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention) Act, alleging that the dispute had been amicably settled by a …
The revisionist, Babu alias Babu Khan, filed a criminal revision (No. 2496 of 2025) challenging a decision of the trial court. The revision was filed 937 days after the cause of action arose. The revisionist sought condonation of the delay, submitting an affidavit with reasons for the delay. The …
The Regional Manager of the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation and others filed a first appeal against order No. 102 of 2010 before the Allahabad High Court, with the respondents being Smt. Usha Rani and others. The appellant was represented by counsel Rahul Anand Gaur, while the respondents were …
Petitioner Sheo Bux Singh filed a writ petition (C No. 3000056 of 2000) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. The petition remained unattended as the petitioner's counsel did not appear and no request for adjournment was made. The Court noted the lack of prosecution of the petition. …
The appellants were convicted by the trial court for assault and causing grievous injuries under various IPC sections and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. They appealed, arguing that the conviction and sentence were against the weight of evidence and excessively severe. After a 40-year delay, the …
The appellant, Sheo Nath Kushwaha, filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, official reports dated 30‑03‑2026 and 13‑03‑2026 confirmed that the appellant had died. The court examined whether the death of the sole appellant would affect the …
The appellant Ram Kishan was convicted by the Sessions Court for assaulting and attempting to murder the complainant Vinod Singh under Section 308 of the Indian Penal Code, based on the victim's testimony and corroborating medical evidence. He appealed, arguing that the conviction was against the …
The appellant, Vishal Kumar, was convicted under Sections 498‑A and 304‑B of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, receiving rigorous imprisonment and fines. He filed a criminal appeal challenging the conviction and sentence, alleging evidential infirmities. While the appeal was …
Virendra Singh, an ex‑Constable, filed writ petition No. 38895 of 2002 in the Allahabad High Court against the Director General of C.R.P.F. and others. The petition was listed but no further steps were taken to prosecute it. The court noted that no party appeared to press the writ petition and that …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 02‑12‑2023 and the cognizance order in Criminal Case No.1389 of 2024, alleging that the FIR was based on false facts. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel withdrew the merit‑based prayer …
The applicants, Geeta Devi and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, they discovered a clerical mistake in the application and sought to withdraw it, requesting liberty to file a fresh application with correct …
The High Court of Allahabad considered Criminal Appeal No. 3679 of 2018 filed by Doli against his conviction under Section 20(II)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, which imposed ten years’ rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs 1,00,000. The appellant challenged the …
The appeal challenged the conviction of two accused under Section 323 read with Section 34 of the IPC for causing simple hurt to the complainant and his father, while the trial court had acquitted them of murder, criminal intimidation and threat. The prosecution alleged that the accused assaulted …
The applicant, Surendra Kumar Gupta, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2009 seeking the exercise of the court's inherent powers. The matter was listed before Hon'ble Justice Sameer Jain, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the State's …
In Transfer Application (Civil) No. 362 of 2020, Smt. Priyamvada Prajapati filed a petition seeking transfer of the suit against Kumar Gaurav. The matter was listed before Hon'ble Justice Saral Srivastava, but no representative appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Counsel …
The appellant was convicted for kidnapping, rape of a 14‑year‑old girl and causing hurt under Sections 450, 366, 376(2) and 323 of the IPC. The prosecution presented the victim’s consistent statements, medical reports and corroborating testimony of the informant and police officers. The defence …
Shubham filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a Family Court order that fixed Rs.5,000 per month as maintenance for his legally wedded wife, claiming he is ill and unemployed and the amount is excessive. The State opposed, asserting that the …
The petitioner, Harish, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8634 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The petitioner’s counsel, Gaurav Tripathi, was not present at the hearing. No interim order had been passed in the …
Satish Chandra Mishra filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The petitioner’s standing counsel submitted instructions dated 04.05.2026 from the Chief Treasury Officer, Ghaziabad, but argued that these were insufficient to resolve the controversy. The Court granted …
The petitioners Ramadhar and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in 2016 before the Allahabad High Court. The matter remained pending for several years and was listed again in a revised list. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition at the hearing. …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the …
The appellants, a group of Scheduled Caste members, appealed a trial court order that dismissed their suit seeking to declare a 2023 declaratory deed cancelling a 2015 consortium agreement void and to compel specific performance of that agreement. They argued that the consortium agreement contained …
The petitioners, Smt. Indu Sisodia and another, filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order dated 12‑02‑2025 passed by the Family Court under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C., which directed the opposite party to pay Rs.5,000 per month to the petitioner and Rs.2,000 to her daughter. …
The petitioner, Manisha Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Settlement Officer Consolidation, Azamgarh to decide Appeal No.1407/5415600002968 under Section 11(1) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act within a specific time. The State’s standing counsel informed the …
The revisionist, Deepchand, married the opposite party No.2 in 2013 and later became a 40% disabled woodcutter after a fall in 2020. The wife left the marital home, demanded divorce and Rs 15 lakh, and the couple’s two children were left with Deepchand’s brothers. The wife filed an application under …
The applicants, Ramkunwar and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 1430 of 2022) arising from FIR No. 95 of 2021 alleging assault and related offences. They alleged that the FIR was lodged six days after the …
Surekha Kumari filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8581 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was listed before a division bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Vivek Chaudhary and Hon'ble Justice Om Prakash …
The Allahabad High Court heard Criminal Appeal No. 1420 of 1983 filed by the remaining appellant, Parmal, against his conviction for attempt to murder and voluntarily causing hurt under Sections 307/34 and 324/34 IPC, for which he had been sentenced to five years' rigorous imprisonment and six …
Rama Shankar Chaudhary filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but the court was uncertain whether cognizance of the charge sheet had been taken. The petitioners' counsel did not appear, while the State's counsel indicated the …
The petitioner, Mani Raj, filed writ petition No. 10381 of 1983 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the D.D.C. and others. The matter had been pending since 1983 and was listed under the oldest pending cases for priority hearing. The court issued a notice that old cases up to 2022 …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Bheema Ram, who was arrested in connection with a case involving the alleged possession of 4,032 bottles of illegal foreign liquor and charged under several …
A writ petition (Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 165 of 2023) was filed by Aasama seeking relief against potential arrest. The State of U.P. and three others responded that a charge sheet had been filed, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The …
The appellants Hetram, Shanker and Bhudat were convicted by the Sessions Court for rape under Section 376 IPC based on testimonies of three eyewitnesses and a medical report that showed no injuries. They appealed under Section 374 CrPC, arguing that the FIR was delayed, witness statements were …
The Court heard Criminal Appeal No. 2399 of 1983 filed by Raghuver and others against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The record of the appeal is not detailed in the excerpt. The Court appointed an amicus curiae, Sri Ajay Kumar Pandey, to assist. The judgment orders that the amicus curiae be paid a …
The appellant, Shahnawaj, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking to set aside a cognizance order dated 06‑10‑2025. He did not contest the merits of the case but requested liberty to file a bail …
Anant Lal filed a writ petition (Writ No. 2782 of 1980) before the Allahabad High Court against J.D.C. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed. The Court, after noting the absence of representation, dismissed the petition. The order also informed that …
The appellant Babalu @ Vimal Kishore Pandey filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to set aside the cognizance and summons order dated 01.11.2025 passed by the Special Judge. The appellant did not wish to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shiva Tivari, who was arrested in a narcotics case involving 56.268 kg of ganja seized from a vehicle. The applicant claimed innocence and argued that the mandatory …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Counsel for the applicant informed the court that the application had become infructuous. The court, relying on this statement, dismissed the application as infructuous. No further arguments or evidence were …
The appellants filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, appellant No.3, Sri Ram alias Bachcha, died as per a report dated 13‑04‑2026, and earlier appellant Nos.1, 2 and 4 had also died. The court examined whether a criminal appeal can continue when …
The appellant Nawab Hasan filed a criminal appeal (No. 509 of 1986) before the Allahabad High Court challenging an acquittal order passed by the Additional Magistrate, Pilibhit in 1981. The appeal was against the State represented by A.G.A. No counsel appeared for the respondents in the revised …
The appellants Jaipal and Ranvir were convicted by the Sessions Court for offences including rioting, voluntarily causing hurt and common intention under Sections 147, 148, 323 and 149 of the IPC, and were released on probation bonds. They appealed, contending that the prosecution witnesses were …
The petitioners Yash Paul and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had …
Surjeet filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court, but failed to appear at the hearing despite a revised call. The State's learned Advocate General was present. The court learned from the office report that the appellant, Surjeet, had died. Since the appellant was deceased, the court …
The appeal challenges the conviction of Brahma Prakash and Ganga Saran for attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC (with common intention under Section 34 for Ganga Saran) and illegal possession of a firearm under Section 25 of the Arms Act. The incident involved the accused firing a country‑made …
The petitioner, Raman Mann, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …
The petition filed by Sitaram Jaiswal sought a writ directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to remove alleged illegal encroachments on several parcels of land recorded as Usar in the revenue records of Molwa Kala village, Prayagraj. The petitioner relied on a public‑interest …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachments made by respondents 6 to 10 on Plot Nos. 1367 and 1368 in Village Chaura Bagar Khet, Shahjahanpur. The court examined instructions from the Deputy District Magistrate showing that the plots …
The second appeal filed by Bhola and others, originally instituted in 1982, remained pending for over four decades. No counsel appeared for the appellants, and the case was not marked to indicate that the cause of action still survived, despite a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be dealt …
In Second Appeal No. 570 of 1994 before the Allahabad High Court, appellant Hafiz Ullah challenged a decree against him. The parties subsequently entered into a compromise, which was verified by the trial court and a report was filed on 19 January 2026. The appellant's counsel submitted the …
The appellants, charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several IPC offences, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(1) of the SC/ST Act seeking to quash the charge sheet and summons. Their counsel did not contest the merits but requested …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Babhuta Ram, who was alleged to be the driver of a truck from which 6,085.44 litres of illicit English liquor was seized. The charges included offences under Sections …
The petitioners, Amarnath Sahu and ten others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 784 of 2023) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petitioners' counsel was absent, and no interim relief had been ordered. The Court observed that the petition had become …
The petitioners, Mohd. Kamil and ten others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from potential arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Akaram, who is charged under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for alleged possession of 1.2 kg of charas. The applicant …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The dispute arose from matrimonial discord and the parties had reached a full …
The petitioner, Ram Dhari, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16 November 2019 that suspended him pending disciplinary proceedings. The standing counsel informed the court that the disciplinary proceedings had concluded, the petitioner was exonerated, and he subsequently retired with …
The petitioners, Muskan Sahgal and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet in the matter had …
Petitioner Umesh Chandra Yadav filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, expressed a desire to pursue an alternative legal remedy and requested that the writ petition be treated as withdrawn. The Court considered the petitioner's request and found no …
The petitioners, Ishwar Chandra and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating …
Chheda Lal filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order directing respondents 2‑4 to remove an alleged illegal encroachment by respondent 5 on Plot No.287, recorded as a pond in Bareilly district. The court examined instructions from the Deputy District Magistrate showing that, under …
The petitioner, Badelal, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 778 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four others. The petitioner's counsel was not present at the hearing. No interim order had been passed in the proceedings. The …
The applicant, Basant Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Negotiable Instruments Act before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel repeatedly sought adjournments, and the cause of action appears to have become moot. On the day of the hearing, no counsel appeared for the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Raj Shantilal Patel, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No.06 of 2024) involving IPC offences (384, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B) and IT Act offences (66‑C, …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest after a charge sheet had been filed by the investigating officer. The State’s Advocate indicated that while the charge sheet was submitted, it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 22414 of 2024) instituted by the State of U.P. for offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354-A, 427 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High Court …
The petitioners, Smt. Kaju and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest after a charge sheet had been filed by the investigating officer. The State’s Additional Government Advocate indicated that while the charge sheet was submitted, it was unclear whether the trial court had taken …
The petitioner, Shyam Kishore Gupta, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel, Neeraj Srivastava, submitted that the petition should be treated as withdrawn. The court considered the request for withdrawal. No substantive issues on the …
Ankit Kumar filed a revision under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to summon five alleged accomplices in a murder case, alleging that the trial court had mechanically rejected his application without applying judicial mind. He argued that the accused were present at the scene, that Section 106 of …
The petitioner, Kapil Kumar, sought a compassionate appointment after his father, a headmaster, died leaving his family destitute. He filed multiple writ petitions challenging the inaction of the District Basic Education Officer, Meerut, and was initially directed to approach the authorities. …
The petitioners, Ramu @ Ramnath and eight others, filed a criminal revision challenging an order dated 10 November 2025 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kairana, which rejected the Final Report No.87 of 2018 and allowed a protest petition filed by the State. The underlying case …
The applicants, a registered partnership firm, entered into a lease deed with the respondents for a retail outlet on 13 June 2018, but the respondents failed to pay the lease amount. The applicants invoked the arbitration clause on 1 September 2025 and filed an application under Section 11(6) of the …
The partnership firm M/s Fashion Point entered into a franchise agreement with Raymond Apparel Ltd. and a nine‑year lease deed with a third party, subsequently demanding payment of the lease amount which the respondent failed to pay. The applicant invoked the arbitration clause on 18‑02‑2025, but …
M/S Jai Ram Marble and Granite filed a Sales/Trade Tax Revision (No. 30 of 2019) before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the Commissioner of Commercial Tax. The revisionist was represented by counsel Vishwjit, while the opposite party was represented by C.S.C. During the hearing, the …
M/s Jai Ram Marble and Granite filed a Sales/Trade Tax Revision (No. 29 of 2019) before the Allahabad High Court challenging a demand by the Commissioner of Commercial Tax. The revisionist was represented by counsel Vishwjit, while the opposite party was represented by C.S.C. During the hearing, the …
Petitioners Ajay Yadav and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against them. The investigating officer appeared and submitted a certified copy of the charge sheet before the High Court. The Court observed that the filing of the charge sheet rendered the …
The petitioner, Rajjan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest after a charge sheet was filed against him. The State of U.P. and three others submitted the charge sheet, but the court was uncertain whether cognizance of the police report had been taken. The learned …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shyam Shivhare, who is accused in an NDPS case for alleged possession of 81 kg of ganja recovered from a car. The applicant argued that he was falsely …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a contempt application filed by Lakhan Singh against Rajiv Shukla after a writ petition filed by the applicant was allowed on 22 July 2025. The State later instructed that the applicant's fair price shop license had been restored on 12 January 2026, and the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Jitendra Saket, who is accused in an NDPS case (Sections 8, 20, 29) for alleged possession of 100 kg of ganja recovered from two vehicles. The applicant asserted …
The petitioners filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging a preliminary notice and attachment order dated 5 January 2026 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Sardhna, Meerut, in a criminal case under Section 165(1) of the BNSS, 2023. The High Court examined whether it …
The appellant Arya Prasad Pandey and another filed a first appeal against Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. The matter was heard before Hon'ble Justice Pankaj Bhatia of the Allahabad High Court. The court disposed of the appeal by an order dated May 7, 2026. The excerpt does not provide the factual …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ravindra Kumar Nirmal under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR No. 0087 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 186, 323, 332, 353, 447, 504 and 506. The applicant argued that …
Mukesh filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etah, which dismissed his criminal complaint against Randheer Singh and others. The petition sought to invoke the High Court's revisional jurisdiction directly. The Court …
The applicants filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal case (Criminal Case No. 1347 of 2025) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad. The court examined the record and found that the material on file did …
The petitioner, Vaibhav Saharawat, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The last order dated 15 May 2025 listed the case among the top‑10 and named Shri Ashutosh Tiwari as counsel for the respondents. The court later received a report on 4 June 2025 indicating that Ashutosh …
The petitioners, Jaydeep Gupta and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and two others. The investigating officer appeared before the court and informed that a charge sheet had already been submitted in the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Pramod Kumar Yadav, who was in custody for alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 143(3) of the same Act and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ritesh Kumar Kharwar, who was in custody for more than five months in a case involving multiple IPC offences (229, 233, 237, 246, 318, 338, 336, 340). The applicant’s counsel argued that allegations of him taking sureties for other accused and …
The petitioner Virendra Kumar Gupta filed a criminal revision challenging an order dated 19 November 2025 passed by the Up‑Ziladhikari, Tehsil Sadar, Varanasi in a case under Section 152 of the BNSS. The petitioner argued that the impugned order had been recalled by the SDM, Varanasi on 18 March …
The revisionist, Om Prakash Singh, was convicted under Sections 7 and 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act for selling adulterated 'besan ke laddu' and sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment with a fine. He filed a criminal revision in 2014, not contesting the conviction but seeking to …
Mukesh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 773 of 2025) involving multiple IPC offences, including sections 229, 233, 237, 246, 318(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2). The prosecution alleged that Mukesh habitually took sureties for other accused and prepared fake documents, while also …
The petitioner, Yogesh Kumar, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a certiorari to quash the order dated 15 September 2015 that cancelled his promotion to the post of Head Clerk Khand Shiksha Adhikari, and also sought a mandamus directing his promotion. The petition was filed …
The High Court of Allahabad was hearing a contempt application filed by Naresh Kumar against Ramchandra Mishra and another. The contempt petition arose from a prior writ order dated 22 December 2017, which directed the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh to decide the petitioner's complaint within three …
The appellant, Raj Kumar, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to set aside a bail order dated 26‑11‑2025 passed by the Special Judge, Hathras. The appeal arose from a case involving multiple offences under the SC/ST Act and the Arms …
The petitioner, Smt. Beena, sought a compassionate appointment after her mother, a peon, died in service. The respondent authority rejected her claim, stating that only unmarried daughters were eligible under the 1974 Rules. The Court examined prior judgments, notably Vimla Srivastava, which struck …
The appellant, Indal Singh, appealed to the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 15 March 2017 and a summoning order dated 4 July 2025 issued by the Special Judge under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellant alleged …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vipin Verma, accused under Sections 115(2), 109(1) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly facilitating an assault that resulted in grievous injuries. The applicant claimed he merely called the victim to his shop and had no role in the …
The revisionist, Ravindra Kumar Jaiswal, filed a transfer application before the Allahabad High Court. No representative appeared on behalf of the revisionist to pursue the application. The opposite party, represented by counsel, was present. The Court dismissed the transfer application for want of …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad heard a revision application (No.41 of 2026) filed by M/s Livguard Mobile Accessories Pvt Ltd against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others concerning a sales/trade tax matter. No counsel appeared on behalf of the revisionist to press the revision. …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad heard a revision application filed by M/s Livguard Mobile Accessories Pvt. Ltd. (the revisionist) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others concerning a sales/trade tax matter. No counsel appeared on behalf of the revisionist to press the revision. …
The revision petition filed by M/S Livguard Mobile Accessories Pvt. Ltd. challenged a sales/trade tax order passed by the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other parties. The petition was listed before the Allahabad High Court but no counsel appeared to press the revision. The Court observed that …
M/S Livguard Mobile Accessories Pvt. Ltd. filed a revision petition (No. 44 of 2026) challenging an order of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other parties in a sales/trade tax matter. The petition was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Piyush Agrawal in Court No. 7. No counsel or party appeared …
The Allahabad High Court had earlier ordered that the custody of the minor, Arahat Bhaskar, be placed with Smt. Vandana Maurya. The father, Shailendra Kumar Singh, appealed to the Supreme Court seeking visitation rights, which the Supreme Court granted, modifying the High Court's order. In light of …
The petitioner, Shiv Poojan Ram, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Principal Secretary, Department of Finance & Revenue, U.P., to decide a departmental revision dated 24 July 2013 filed under Rule 13 of the U.P. Government Servant (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1999. The court allowed …
The applicants, Rajeev Kumar and three others, were charged under IPC sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 in Criminal Case No. 9760 of 2019. They filed a Section 482 application seeking quash of the proceedings, alleging that the dispute with the key prosecution witness (Opposite Party No.2) had been …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 21‑10‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 06‑12‑2024 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Delhi Police …
Shahid, arrested on 09‑09‑2024, is charged under IPC sections 366, 120‑B, 323, 504 and 506 in Crime No. 118 of 2024. His first bail application was rejected, but a second application was filed citing the sluggish progress of the trial, the fact that the trial had not even commenced, and his …
The petitioners sought relief in a criminal miscellaneous writ petition, but mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue the petition. The court noted the absence of representation for both sides. Consequently, the …
Petitioners Harish Chandrpal and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vijaypal, who was arrested in a NDNDPS case for alleged possession of 2.94 kg of charas. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false implication, and argued …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 16‑01‑2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge/FTC, Varanasi, which had remitted the matter back to an Executive Magistrate for fresh consideration. The applicants argued that the …
The applicants, Mujahid Hussain and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The State's counsel raised no objection to the …
The petitioner, Ajay Lohia, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court against the Central Bureau of Investigation. The petition was represented by counsel Anita Singh and Dinesh Kumar Misra, while the respondent CBI was represented by Rahul Srivastava. …
The applicant, Nikhil Mittar, filed an application under Section 528 seeking quash of a chargesheet and cognizance order relating to alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 IPC arising from a land‑registration dispute. The court observed that the dispute was essentially civil, …
The appellant, Saurabh Bhojwal, appealed to the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash the summoning order dated 19‑09‑2025 and the entire Special Sessions Trial No. 1222 of 2025 arising from Crime No. 306 of 2025, which involved several IPC offences and provisions of the Special Courts Act. The …
Petitioners Bhola Sharma and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The court considered the request and, finding no …
Petitioner Satyapal filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing certain respondents not to construct a sewerage Nali on his Bhumidhari land in Harduttpur, Badaun. The petition raised the issue of alleged interference with his peaceful possession by respondents No.7 to 12. The High Court held …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed. The Court …
M/s L.D. Goyal Steels Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging the inability to appeal GST orders because the GST Appellate Tribunal had not yet been constituted. The High Court noted that the Central Government had subsequently constituted the Tribunal and issued procedural rules under Section …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 69913 of 2024) arising from a matrimonial dispute that they claim has been resolved by compromise. The court examined the record and observed that the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shahid @ Sahil, who was charged under Sections 317(2) and 305 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shahid @ Sahil, who was charged under Sections 317(2) and 305 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, …
The applicant, Amir Ansari, filed a petition under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 5 March 2021 that framed charges against him in a trial for offences under Sections 376, 354‑D, 506 of the IPC and Section 67 of the IT Act. The petition was filed on 8 …
The applicant, Vijay Vishwakarma, sought bail in a dowry‑death case (Crime No. 258 of 2025) alleging that his wife’s death was a suicide caused by a uterine fibroid, not a dowry‑related homicide. The prosecution argued that the wife died under abnormal circumstances within seven years of marriage …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sonpal @ Sona, who is accused in Crime No. 172 of 2012 of offences under IPC Sections 307, 323, 504, 506 and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant …
The petitioner Jamil Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a First Information Report and subsequent charge sheet in Crime No. 78 of 2023, which alleged offences under Section 366 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act. No …
The applicant, Pavan Bind, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 299 of 2025) involving alleged violations of Section 317 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. He claimed the charges were false and based on a planted recovery, arguing that his prolonged …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 121 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 363, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The …
Surendra Nath Rai, a government servant, was summoned in a criminal proceeding (Case No. 3454 of 1999) for offences under IPC sections 147, 504, 342, 323 and 306. He filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the summoning order on the ground that no …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the charge sheet filed in Crime No. 198 of 2022, which alleged their involvement under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, 504, 506 and 406 of the erstwhile IPC. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the State's …
The applicants filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash a criminal complaint (Case No. 5319 of 2023) filed under Sections 498A, 504 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging domestic violence. The complaint arose from a matrimonial dispute between the husband (applicant No.1) and …
The applicant, Pokhpal, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to set aside an order dated 13 January 2026 passed by the Special Judge (E.C. Act) in Aligarh, which had rejected his earlier application under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The impugned order arose …
Mallan Khan filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the summoning order dated 11‑09‑2014 and the entire proceeding of Complaint No.1341 of 2014, which was instituted under Sections 51 and 59(1) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. The applicant claimed he was falsely …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 272/2022) in Crime No. 118 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …
Smt. Meena filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged in Crime No. 37 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376, 323 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The …
The petitioners, Smt. Aarti Verma and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged in Crime No. 941 of 2021, which alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 406 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …
Vibhas Chandra filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summoning order dated 12‑02‑2019 and the charge‑sheet in a criminal case (Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC) pending before the ACJM‑II, Prayagraj. The matter was referred to the Court’s Mediation Centre, where …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No. 663 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional …
In Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7779 of 2022, Lalit Rajpoot and four others filed a petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The petitioner's counsel, Ajay Dubey, was not present before the bench. No interim relief had been granted in the proceedings. The Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court observed that …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Evidence Act challenging an interim maintenance order dated 15‑07‑2025 passed by the Additional District Judge, Barabanki, under Section 125 of the CrPC. The applicant claimed that the order requiring a monthly payment of Rs.5,000 to …
The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar Upadhyay, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a refund of money he had deposited with the High Court's Mediation and Conciliation Centre after the opposite parties failed to appear, causing mediation to fail. The petitioner argued that, since the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the subsequent charge sheet filed in Crime No. 30 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 323, 494, 498A, 504, 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. No …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 41 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 308, 323 and 504 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the filing of a charge sheet (CS 383/2023) in Crime No. 122 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 452, 504 and 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The petition was heard in the revised list with no petitioner present, while the State's Additional Government Advocate appeared. The court noted that the charge-sheet had already been filed, as per …
The petitioner Imran Ali filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard after the charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 5 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of the Uttar Pradesh Director General of Police. The Court noted …
Petitioner Teerath Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against him. The petitioner’s counsel argued that a charge sheet had already been filed, rendering the writ petition moot. The respondents did not contest this submission. The Court examined whether the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by its Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that the …
Shajiya Parveen, a housewife, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No. 358 of 2024) involving alleged fraud and multiple IPC offences (420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506). She claimed she was falsely implicated as the wife of the co‑accused whose husband …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the subsequent filing of a charge sheet (CS 262/2022) in Crime No. 267 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 377, 307, 504, 506 of the erstwhile IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 83 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 406, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The police …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioners, Brijesh and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 97 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 498A and DP Act sections 3 and 4. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the subsequent charge sheet filed in Crime No. 182 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 120B, 420, 406, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 172/2023) filed in Crime No. 76 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. No …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …
The petitioners, Ankit Kumar and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the filing of a charge sheet (CS 182/2023) in Crime No. 138 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 308, 323, 504 and 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet in Crime No. 170 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Domestic Violence (Protection) Act. No petitioner counsel appeared …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioners challenged the filing of a First Information Report and subsequent charge sheet in a case involving offences under several IPC sections and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. They argued that the counter‑affidavit had not been filed and sought relief from the High Court. The police, …
The petitioners Arman and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 79 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376, 377, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. No petitioner …
The petition, filed by Sunil Verma (a minor), sought to challenge the First Information Report (FIR) relating to Crime No. 133 of 2023, which alleged offences under Section 376 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State's Additional …
The petitioner, Ajay Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet filed in Crime No.69 of 2023, which alleged offences under several IPC sections and the SC/ST Act. The petition sought judicial intervention to quash the FIR/charge sheet. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR under Section 380 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 79 of 2023. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The police had …
The petitioners Asif and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the …
We use cookies for analytics to improve your experience. Essential cookies are always on. Privacy Policy.