Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 8601–8800

SMT. SARASWATI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Smt. Saraswati and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR filed against them. The petition was heard in the revised list with no petitioner present, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The court examined a report …

AMIR AHMAD AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 170/2023) in Crime No. 138 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376(2)(m), 352, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State’s …

UDHAN SINGH AND ANOTHERversusDISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (J.D.), City, Farrukhabad to decide a temporary injunction application (6‑C2) filed in Original Suit No. 531 of 2025 and to maintain status quo over the disputed property. The High Court noted that the underlying suit was already pending and …

SMT. INDU DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Indu Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against her. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 05.05.2026 from the Legal Cell of the …

RAVI SHANKAR @ RAVI SHANKAR TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ravi Shankar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Advocate General, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …

AJAY PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ajay Pandey, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 13 March 2025 in a case pending before the ACJM Court in Deoria, which alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 191(2), 352, 351(3) and 324(4) of the Indian Penal …

JITENDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Jitendra Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised list with no petitioner present, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The court noted that a charge-sheet had already been …

RAMASHANKAR PATI TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the …

PRADEEP PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Pradeep Pal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The petitioners alleged that they might be arrested despite a charge sheet having been filed, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the …

ARIF KHAN @ LUCKYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Arif Khan @ Lucky filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 05.05.2026 from the Legal Cell of the …

JAIVIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jaivir, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7335 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an unspecified order of the State of U.P. and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Rajesh Kumar Verma, argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of …

KAILASH YADAV ALIAS CHHOTUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Kailash Yadav alias Chhotu filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and three others. The court observed that attempts at mediation between the parties had been unsuccessful. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the …

SHAMSHUDDIN KHAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 05.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …

SMT. AALIYA @ JANHVI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 05.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that the …

KALEEM AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet in the matter had already been filed. The Court …

MOHD.SAEEDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohd. Saeed, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …

SIMTHESH KUMAR DALAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 05.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted …

NEHA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Neha and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The court examined a report dated 05‑05‑2026 indicating that the police had already filed a charge‑sheet. Relying on the fact that a charge‑sheet had been …

ATUL TIWARI AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a …

AMIR RAZA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered against them. The petition was heard after the police had filed a charge sheet, as reflected in the office report dated 05.05.2026. The court observed that the filing of the charge sheet made the challenge to …

SMT. ABHILASHA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt. Abhilasha and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against them. The petitioners argued that the filing of a charge sheet rendered the writ petition infructuous and therefore it should be dismissed. The respondents, the State of U.P. and …

SHEKHAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shekhar and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the Director General of Police, submitted a report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed on May 5, 2026. …

SACHIN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted …

WASEEM ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Waseem Ali filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 7735 of 2023) challenging his potential arrest in a case where a charge sheet had been filed by the investigating officer. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that while the charge sheet was submitted, …

IBNE ALI @ SHAHRUKHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ibne Ali @ Shahrukh, was arrested in connection with Crime No.329 of 2025 under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated in a Rs.50 lakh demand case, that the alleged victim's recovery details were undisclosed, and that he had been …

PAVAN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Pavan Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 5 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of …

VIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 05.05.2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court observed that …

DR. TAPAS KUMAR DASversusHARISH CHANDRA RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND 3 OTHERS

Dr. Tapas Kumar Das, an associate professor at Harish Chandra Research Institute, was the subject of ten sexual harassment complaints filed by female students covering the period 2013‑2016. The Institute’s Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) investigated under the Sexual Harassment of Women at …

BRAJESH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State submitted a report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court observed that since the charge-sheet was on record, the FIR could not be quashed by the writ petition. …

SRI MAYANK SRIVASTAVA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 7598 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioners' counsel was not present, and no interim order had been passed. The court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. Consequently, the …

SMT. SHRADDHA TANEJA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Shraddha Taneja and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated …

SHAMBHU NATH RAI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Shambhu Nath Rai and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by …

RAM ASHISHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 05.05.2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the …

MAHESH CHANDRA SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mahesh Chandra Shukla, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The High Court noted that the charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report from the Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh. Since the charge-sheet was on record, the …

DEVENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Devendra Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 05.05.2026 from the Legal Cell of the Uttar …

AHMAD ALI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the …

KULDEEP RATHAUR AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the …

SAKIR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by counsel, submitted a report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that the filing of a charge-sheet rendered the challenge to …

NEERAJ JAIN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

In Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7841 of 2022, petitioners Neeraj Jain and two others filed a petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The petitioner's counsel, Sunil Kumar Yadav, was absent, and no interim relief had been ordered. The court observed that the petition …

SANCHIT RASTOGI AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Sanchit Rastogi and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioners. The State counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the …

SANJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the Allahabad High Court, with counsel for the petitioner absent and the State represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate. The …

UTTEJ KUMAR @ RITESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 7521 of 2023) was filed by Uttej Kumar @ Ritesh Kumar against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petitioner's counsel was absent and no interim relief had been sought or granted. The court observed that the petition had become infructuous due …

VISHAL @ RATANDIPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …

AMBRISH GEORGE FREDERICversusSTATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ambrish George Frederic, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the …

RAM BACHAN KUSHWAHA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ram Bachan Kushwaha and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance …

AVIRAL BAJPAI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 05.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court observed that …

HEMANT KUMARI AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Hemant Kumari and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. An interim order was already in operation in the writ …

SMT. SHREYA KHANDELWAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Shreya Khandelwal and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the …

PRAVEEN TYAGI @ PRAVEEN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Praveen Tyagi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7763 of 2023 against the State of U.P. and three others. The petitioner’s counsel, Sunil Kumar Dubey, was not present before the Court. No interim relief had been sought or granted. The Court observed that the petition had …

SMT PREETY DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Smt. Preety Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, noting the existence of an interim …

NAMAN KATIYAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Naman Katiyar and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition against the State of U.P. and two others seeking relief. The court observed that mediation between the parties had failed. Additionally, no counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the …

SURESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ petition …

SADDAM HUSAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Saddam Husain, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 5 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of the …

AMIT PRATAP @ AMIT PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Amit Pratap challenged the registration of the FIR filed against them before the Allahabad High Court. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed by the …

MANGU LAL VERMA AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 7867 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel was absent, and no interim order had been passed. The Court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. Consequently, the petition …

TANWEER SIDDIQUI @ TANWEER AHMAD SIDDIQUIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Tanweer Siddiqui and Tanweer Ahmad Siddiqui, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition sought relief, but mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue …

PRAKASH CHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Prakash Chandra, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …

SRI PAL SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sri Pal Singh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, noting the existence of an interim order …

TARUN KUMAR AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The applicant's father obtained a partition decree under Section 176 (now Section 116) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, with a final decree dated 28‑05‑2014. Instead of executing the decree, the applicant filed a writ petition in 2024 seeking removal of alleged illegal encroachments on government …

CHANDRAMANI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Chandramani and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from potential arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken …

KESHAV KANT YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Keshav Kant Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the …

SAKIR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Sakir and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, noting the existence …

AASHISH CHAUDHARYversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Aashish Chaudhary, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief. The Court had earlier issued an interim order directing the petitioner to deposit a specified amount to explore settlement through the Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The petitioner failed to comply …

CHANDRA BHUSAN MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Chandra Bhusan Mishra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, noting the …

NEERAJ @ BUNTY AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's counsel indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, noting the existence of an interim order in …

RAKESH SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rakesh Srivastava, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court …

TARANJEET SINGH AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Taranjeet Singh and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, …

SHASHIKANT RAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction for the respondents to complete an enquiry and take legal action against respondent No.6 within a set time. The court examined the instructions and noted that a detailed inspection report dated 26 September 2025, prepared by …

KAMLESH SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State's Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, noting the existence of an …

KALYAN SINGH AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 18 OTHERS

Petitioners Kalyan Singh and eight others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging their potential arrest. No respondent appeared, and the Attorney General for the State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken …

GOVIND @ GOPAL AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but mediation between the parties failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue the petition. The court noted the absence of representation and the failure of mediation. …

SWAPNIL PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Swapnil Prakash, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority not to interfere with his peaceful possession of a house in Bulandshahr. The petitioner argued that the Authority's demolition …

MAHESH KUMAR YADAV ALIAS MAHESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Mahesh Kumar Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State of Uttar Pradesh and two others were respondents. The petitioners' counsel were absent, while the State's counsel indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial …

SMT. RUKMANI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Smt. Rukmani and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. The Court had earlier issued an interim order directing the petitioners to deposit a specified amount to enable settlement negotiations …

SUDHEER KUMAR PANDEY AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sudheer Kumar Pandey and three others, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7869 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petitioner's counsel, Vivek Kumar Mishra, was absent at the hearing. No …

VARSHA DEVI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Varsha Devi and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 7858 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petitioner's counsel, Santosh Kumar Shukla, was absent, and no interim orders had been passed. …

SMT. NAVITA SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Smt. Navita Srivastava filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the possibility of her arrest. The State of Uttar Pradesh submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the uncertainty …

SAJIVAN VISHWAKARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sajivan Vishwakarma and another, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7892 of 2023 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The petitioner's counsel, Sheetala Prasad Pandey, was not present during the hearing. No interim order had been passed in the matter. The …

AMRIT SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to clean and repair blocked drains that have caused waterlogging, foul odor, and vector-borne disease hazards for over thirty years. The petition cited a 2024 repair …

MUSHIR AHMADversusSRI RAJEEV GARG, CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND ANOTHER

Mushir Ahmad filed a civil contempt application against Sri Rajeev Garg, Chief Conservator of Forest, alleging non‑compliance with a writ court order. The applicant’s counsel, Mohammad Yaseen, informed the High Court that the opposite party had complied with the writ order. The court examined …

GYANESHWAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gyaneshwar Singh, filed a writ petition challenging a judgment and order dated 18‑12‑2025 passed by respondent No.2 under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The State’s standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner had an alternative remedy – an …

TEJ PAL SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Tej Pal Singh and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against prospective arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim …

N.K. JAIRATHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The petitioner, N.K. Jairath, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the petitioner expressed a desire not to pursue the application and sought its withdrawal. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted a request to …

AKASH SONKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Akash Sonkar, filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order dated 03.01.2025 passed by the Principal Judge of Family Court No.1, Meerut, under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The revision was filed 327 days after the impugned order, prompting a …

KAMLESH SINGHversusPUSHPENDRA SINGH KAMA AND 17 OTHERS

The petition under Article 227 challenged an order allowing the engrossment of a 1984 final partition decree on non‑judicial stamp papers. The decree, drawn in a suit for partition of immovable property, allocated shares to the plaintiff and defendant No.1 and, through the Commissioner’s report, …

ASHOK KUMAR BAGHELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ashok Kumar Baghel filed a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, his counsel, Raj Kamal, sought permission to withdraw the revision. The State, represented by G.A., and the second opposite party, represented by Komal Prasad Maurya, raised no objection to the …

IN REversusKRISHNA PAL SINGH ADVOCATE KP SINGH

The High Court considered a criminal contempt application filed against a senior advocate who had previously been held in contempt. The contemnor, aged about 72, filed an unconditional written apology after being granted time to submit an affidavit. The Special Counsel argued that, being a repeat …

NISHAR AHMAD AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by Nishar Ahmad and Ateek Ahmad, accused in a case under Sections 305‑A, 331(4), 317(2) and 317(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicants claimed innocence, …

RAM NARESH MISHRAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 6 OTHERS

Ram Naresh Mishra filed a public interest litigation (PIL No. 610 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to act on an inquiry report dated 5 September 2024. The report had found the respondents guilty of failing to deduct tax …

MAHENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Mahendra Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised list with no petitioner present, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The court noted that the charge-sheet had already …

BHOLA NATH SHARMA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Bhola Nath Sharma and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The Additional Government Advocate and the respondent's counsel raised no objection to the …

ANKURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Ankur, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to defreeze his bank account (No. 038410175277, IFSC IPOS000001) held with India Post Payments Bank. The petitioner relied on a prior decision of the Lucknow Bench in Khalsa Medical Store v. Reserve Bank of …

SMT UMA OJHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt Uma Ojha filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Ashutosh Pandey, requested that the petition be withdrawn. The court considered the request and, finding no objection, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as …

NASIR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants, Nasir and Guddu, were initially named in an FIR but were later exonerated by the investigating officer after a re‑statement by the complainant on 26 November 2022, resulting in a charge‑sheet only against co‑accused Nanhe and Maqsood. Two years later, during trial, the complainant …

SHIVANSH PANDEY @ SHIVANK PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shivansh Pandey, who was named in FIR No. 262 of 2025 under Sections 140(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had no specific role in the FIR, the injured party suffered no …

SMT. LATA DEVI SONIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt. Lata Devi Soni, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 12‑01‑2026 and the underlying criminal complaint (Case No. 4036 of 2025) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint alleged that the applicant, …

MUKESHA DEVIversusRAJENDRA AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mukesha Devi, claimed ownership of a 41.85 sq. meter plot in Kasganj district, alleging that the respondents were obstructing her possession after she purchased the land by a registered sale deed dated 08-12-2023. She obtained a temporary injunction from the Civil Judge, Senior …

SATISH KUMAR BHATNAGARversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Satish Kumar Bhatnagar filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 33136 of 2007) against the Union of India seeking relief after three charge‑sheets were issued to him. The High Court directed the respondent to file a counter‑affidavit to show what action had been taken. Both parties exchanged …

BHOOP PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Bhoop Pratap Singh, filed a writ petition seeking to quash the order dated 3 September 2007 that cancelled his selection as Constable in the 47‑Battalian PAC, Ghaziabad, on the ground that his high school mark‑sheet was found forged. The petition remained pending since 2007 and no …

AJEET SINGHversusKALANIDHI NAITHANI, DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

The applicant, Ajeet Singh, filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court against Kalanidhi Naithani, Deputy Inspector General of Police. The applicant's counsel, Jitendra Kumar Upadhyay, informed the Court that the order of the writ court had been fully complied with. The Court …

SATISH CHANDRA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Satish Chandra Sharma, a Lekhpal, was arrested after a complaint that he demanded Rs 5,000 for handing over possession. He has been in jail since 21 January 2026 and claims he has been falsely implicated. The State opposed bail, citing his criminal antecedents, but offered no evidence that he would …

AMITversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Amit, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 701 of 2025 involving offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 109(1), 103(1), 115(2), 352 of the BNS and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. Amit argued that the firearm injury to the …

TRIVENI DUTT SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Petitioner Triveni Dutt Sharma filed a writ petition challenging a show‑cause notice dated 19‑Mar‑2008 issued by the Commandant of 47‑Battalion, P.A.C., Ghaziabad, which led to his termination on the ground that his appointment documents were forged. The petition sought to quash the notice and the …

VIKRAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants Vikram and two others appealed against a Special Judge's order rejecting their discharge application under Section 227 Cr.P.C. The case involved charges under Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST Act and Sections 452 and 506 of the IPC. The appellants argued that the alleged insult occurred …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusYOGENDRA SHARMA AND OTHERS

The appellant New India Assurance Co. Ltd. appealed against a tribunal award of Rs.4,51,700 for the death of Kuldeep Kumar, arguing that the driver of the offending tractor was not impleaded and that the deduction of one‑third of the loss as personal expenses was illegal because the deceased was …

DHARMVIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dharmvir, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 06‑09‑2025 that constituted a revenue team to proceed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 concerning a 0.047‑hectare land (Gata No. 988). The petitioner argued that the revenue proceedings were pending and sought …

RIHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rihan, the driver of a truck alleged to have misappropriated 888 bags of rice belonging to an informant. The prosecution charged him under several IPC sections including 318(4), 316(5), 303(2), 317(2), 238(a) and 61(2) BNS. The applicant argued …

VINAY JAIN @ KIKKI JAINversusSTATE OF U.P.

Vinay Jain was arrested in Crime No. 449 of 2025 under IPC sections 308(5) and 351(2) for alleged extortion. The informant claimed the applicant threatened him but admitted no money was received. The applicant has six other criminal cases, three of which are concurrent with the present case, and he …

CHANDRAWATI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Chandrawati Devi, owned a vehicle that was seized by police under Section 72 of the U.P. Excise Act, 1955, on suspicion of being used for illegal liquor transport. The District Magistrate ordered the vehicle's confiscation without offering the owner an opportunity to redeem it by …

ANKIT KUMAR SAHU AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, a group of ten individuals, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 02‑03‑2022 and the related criminal proceedings (Case Crime No. 331 of 2021) instituted under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 342 and sections …

DR RAJ ROOPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 filed by Dr. Raj Roop, who claimed he was falsely implicated in a rape case and that the relationship with the victim was consensual. The applicant argued that the pending Section 528 application and lack …

SHAMA MASOODversusZAFAR KHAN AND 6 OTHERS

Shama Masood filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside earlier orders dated 12‑02‑2019 and 09‑09‑2025, to obtain permission to repair a gate and wall, and to have two related suits either dismissed or expedited. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner withdrew the challenge to …

MOGALI ALIAS BANTIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Mogali alias Banti, was charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the IPC for alleged caste‑based abuse and other offences. The appellant argued that the alleged abuse was not made in public view, a requirement under Section 3(1)(Dha) of the SC/ST Act. The State …

BHAIRAV @ SADHU @ JHALLARversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Bhairav @ Sadhu @ Jhallar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the proceedings of Case No.292 of 2015 (arising from NCR No.41 of 2014 under Sections 504 and 506 IPC) and to obtain protection while surrendering before the trial court. The State opposed …

PRATIBHA TRIVEDIversusDISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Pratibha Trivedi, filed a writ petition challenging the appointment of seven teachers in a primary section despite low student numbers, and sought an adjournment citing the illness of one of six counsels. The court noted that only one counsel was ill while five others were available, …

SUKHA @ RAFIK KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court heard Criminal Appeal No. 3016 of 2026 filed by Sukha @ Rafik Khan under Section 14‑A(1) of the SC/ST Act seeking quash of the charge‑sheet and summons relating to alleged offences under the SC/ST Act and the IPC. The appellant alleged that the case was fabricated, stemming …

YOGESH CHANDRA BAJPAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Dismiss

The petitioner, Yogesh Chandra Bajpai, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to retire him at age 58, to pay him salary and benefits as if his retirement age were 60, and to quash a policy decision that raised the superannuation age. The petition also challenged a specific …

SITA JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Sita Jaiswal filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to restrain the Gram Pradhan of Harishankarpur and his associates from interfering with her construction on a parcel of land. She also requested the authorities to consider her claim filed on 16.02.2026. The High Court directed the …

SANDEEPversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sandeep, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 302(2) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, that the FIR did not name him, and that the recovered motorcycle was planted. The …

SURATRAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Suratram, who was charged under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2) and 103(1) of the B.N.S. for allegedly beating and shooting a deceased person. The applicant argued that the firearm causing the fatal injury was linked to a co‑accused, that …

ARUN KUMAR SINGHversusJOINT DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad considered applications filed in Writ Petition No. 6581 of 2008, originally filed by the deceased petitioner Arun Kumar Singh against the Joint Director of Consolidation and others. The petitioner sought condonation of delay for filing a substitution application to …

DEEP CHAND SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Deep Chand Singh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. to retire him at the age of 58 and to pay his salary and benefits as if his retirement age were 60. The petitioners were represented by counsel Rakesh Pandey and Sudhir Srivastava, …

SNEHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Sneha filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 15‑01‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 16‑05‑2025 in State v. Sneha (Case No. 21522 of 2025). The applicant contended that the offences alleged – Sections 352, 115(2) and …

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusARYA PRASAD PANDEY AND OTHERS

A fourteen‑year‑old boy died in a road accident involving a truck, leading the claimants (the deceased’s family) to file a claim against The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. The insurer argued that the vehicle was not insured at the time of the accident and that a cheque issued by the owner was …

SANJAY SINGH SENGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Sanjay Singh Sengar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 5 May 2026 from the …

JAHID ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Jahid Ali, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 28‑10‑2025, the cognizance order dated 17‑1‑2026, and the criminal proceedings (Case No. 461 of 2026) arising from FIR No. 269 of 2025 that alleged offences under …

KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusOM PRAKASH

The Kanpur Development Authority filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner later sought to withdraw the petition on the ground of an inherent defect, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition. The court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, …

SONUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu, accused in a case under Sections 309(6), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5) and 3(5) of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S., relating to alleged assault and theft of a mobile phone. The applicant’s counsel argued that the FIR did not name him, that the IMEI …

FAIZAN @ BABLUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Faizan @ Bablu, accused of offences under Sections 376, 354, 384, 506 IPC and Section 67(a) of the IT Act, filed an application under Section 207 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the sealed pen‑drive containing a video of the victim. The trial court rejected the application, …

RAM MURATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Murati, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to pay his General Provident Fund (GPF) amount (IRRTU 47095) and to decide a representation dated 14 June 2012. The respondent counsel informed the court that the GPF amount had …

KAMLESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court observed that once a …

KM. SNEHA SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sneha Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR against her. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the …

WAZID AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the police had already filed a charge-sheet. The Court noted that once a …

AMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Amar Singh filed a writ petition challenging an order passed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, alleging that the land demarcation was carried out without his presence and that the inspection report was not provided to him. The High Court had earlier directed the State's standing …

KM. NAUSHABA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet in the matter had already been filed by the …

GOLU @ PRADEEP AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Golu @ Pradeep and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, appeared before the bench. The court examined an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the …

ADHAR CHAUDHARY AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 05.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court observed that …

SMT PREETI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt Preeti and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 05.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had …

DEEPAK SHARMA AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR. The court examined a report dated 05‑05‑2026 indicating that the police had already filed a charge‑sheet. On the basis that the charge‑sheet was filed, the court held …

RAMNATHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a …

DHEERAJ @ BILLUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Dheeraj @ Billu, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and three others seeking relief. The petitioner's counsel, Agnivesh and Pradyumn Kumar, were not present before the court. No interim order had been passed in the …

UMESH SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Umesh Singh and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the …

RAM BABU AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Ram Babu and ten others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against arrest. The State's Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The Allahabad High Court, noting the uncertainty about …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSMT. DIVYANJALI AND OTHERS

The appellant New India Assurance Co. Ltd. appealed against a tribunal award concerning compensation for the death of a contractor in a motor vehicle accident. The tribunal had fixed the deceased's monthly earnings at Rs.5,000, rejecting the claimant's claim of Rs.9,000, and the High Court accepted …

BOBY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The petition was filed after the police had already filed a charge-sheet, as confirmed by a report from the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh. No …

KIRAN WALA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the …

PANKAJ KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside two interlocutory orders dated 04-10-2024 and 21-09-2024 passed by the trial court in a criminal case (MU/AS 559/2019) involving alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 307 of the IPC and the Dowry …

KAILASH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 5 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of the …

PRABHAT CHAUDHARY AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State submitted a charge‑sheet on 5 May 2026, as reflected in the office report. The petition sought to quash the FIR despite the charge‑sheet already being filed. The Court observed that once a …

MOHD AFZAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but the trial court later filed a charge sheet against them. The petitioners argued that the filing of the charge sheet made the writ petition infructuous and should be dismissed. The respondents contended that the petition …

SACHIN @ KANJA @ SUMIT SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sachin @ Kanja @ Sumit Sharma, who is accused under Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act in a case registered in 2021. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false …

RISHABH CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rishabh Chaudhary, filed a writ petition alleging that the Department of Sports, Uttar Pradesh had not acted on his application for a sports scholarship. He claimed the process was not fair, transparent, or reasoned. The respondents, the State and others, argued that the petition …

SOHAN SINGH ALIAS SONU THAKUR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sohan Singh alias Sonu Thakur and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been …

HARI SHANKERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

The petitioner, a former peon/chainman, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to decide a representation he submitted on 21 August 2014 and to grant consequential service benefits. The representation pertained to his termination order dated 10 March 1998, which he had not …

AJAY KUMAR AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against them in a case pending before the State of Uttar Pradesh. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed, rendering the petition moot. The court …

NAVEDA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court noted that once a charge-sheet is …

SAJID AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …

SHAIMUN NISHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Shaimun Nisha filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ petition and, to prevent …

ARVIND KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Arvind Kumar Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petitioner was unrepresented at the hearing, while the State was represented by its Additional Government Advocate. The court noted, based on a report …

PRABHAKAR PANDITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, a retired Assistant Prosecution Officer, challenged the recovery of Rs. 68,619 from his retirement dues, which the respondents claimed was excess pay due to an erroneous increment. After his retirement, the petitioner gave written consent to the deduction under pressure, and the …

NEERAJ KUMAR NIRALAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Neeraj Kumar Nirala, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the State of U.P. and four other respondents. The dispute centered on whether the respondents had accepted the petitioner’s option to continue working only until the age of 60 years. …

OM PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Om Prakash, filed a writ petition seeking payment of interest on a sum of Rs.3,64,654 that had been paid to him on 15 April 2026. The respondent State of U.P. and others filed a compliance affidavit stating that the principal amount had been paid and that interest of Rs.18,296 was …

RACHIT JAIN AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Rachit Jain and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioners. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …

KALPANA SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Kalpana Singh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the …

WASIM ANWAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The petition was heard after the charge-sheet had already been filed by the police, as per a report dated 5 May 2026. The court noted that the petition sought to contest the FIR, but the filing of …

DHARMRAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Dharmraj filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was filed after the police had already filed a charge-sheet, as indicated by a report from the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police, U.P. No …

RAM DHARIversusSTATE OF U.P.AND 2 ORS.

Petitioner Ram Dhari filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an order dated 09.04.2013 that terminated his services as Collection Amin and also sought a mandamus directing his regular posting and payment of salary and benefits. He argued that the termination was illegal and that he should be …

BABITA RASTOGI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Babita Rastogi and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State of U.P. submitted a charge‑sheet, as reflected in the office report dated 5 May 2026. The Court observed that since the charge‑sheet had …

SMT NANDANI CORPUS AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ of habeas corpus to compel the petitioner, Arjun Gupta, to produce and cohabit with his wife, Smt. Nandani, alleging she was being detained. The court interacted with the corpus, a 21‑year‑old major, who voluntarily resides with her mother and expressed unwillingness to …

SURENDRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a cognizance order dated 06.01.2026 passed by a Judicial Magistrate in Meerut, which had treated a case under Sections 115(2) and 351(2) BNS as a State case. They argued that these offences are non‑cognizable and, per …

JANGI SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Jangi Singh and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted …

ARVIND AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Arvind and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the …

ASHOK KUMAR SETHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ashok Kumar Seth, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 25‑April‑2015 and the cognizance order dated 22‑May‑2015 in State v. Ashok Kumar Seth (Case No. 5851/2015), which arose from FIR No. 125/2015 alleging …

ASHOK KUMAR SETHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ashok Kumar Seth, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a charge sheet dated 25 May 2015 and a cognizance order dated 9 June 2015 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, in criminal case No. 446/2019 relating to …

MOHD. HAIDAR AND 2 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Mohd. Haidar and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 5 May 2026 from the Legal Cell …

ANIRUDDH YADAV @ SUNIL YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Aniruddh Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ petition and …

ANIRUDDH YADAV @ SUNIL YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Aniruddh Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State of U.P. submitted a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the petition and …

ANIRUDH PASWAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Anirudh Paswan and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a …

RITESH @ RAKESHversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ritesh @ Rakesh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the prospect of his arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, noting the …

VIRENDRA KUMAR VERMA AND ANOTHERversusPASHUPATI YADAV YADAV AND OTHERS

The appellant filed a claim petition for compensation after the death of a person in a road accident that occurred on 26.05.2008 at Sivan Bypass Road, Bihar. The petition was filed in Deoria, Uttar Pradesh, on the ground that the claimants were working for gain there. The Claims Tribunal dismissed …

MANISH SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Manish Singh and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. The petitioners attempted mediation, which ultimately failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents …

GULAFSHA ANSARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Gulafsha Ansari filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 22‑04‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 11‑07‑2025 in Criminal Case No.23346 of 202. The applicant contended that the offences alleged—Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 324(3) of the BNS—are …

SMT. POOJAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Smt. Pooja filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State of Uttar Pradesh and three others submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the …

HAKIM SINGH AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Hakim Singh and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High …

FAUZIA KHAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ms. Fauzia Khan and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 7414 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two other respondents. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners, Ravi Anand Agarwal and Shreya …

RAUMAN SUHAIL SAIFI ALIAS PASHA AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Rauman Suhail Saifi and nine others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the …

LAVKUSH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Lavkush and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR registered against them. The petition was listed in the revised list; the petitioners were absent while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The court examined an …

MULAYAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered the bail application of Mulayam Yadav, who was not named in the FIR but was later implicated for transferring money to a constable in a case alleged under the Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant argued that the transfer was a personal loan for a marriage and that there was no …

KOSHAL SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Koshal Sharma and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that …

DURGESH CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Durish Chauhan, who had been in custody since 13 January 2026 in a case under Sections 109(1) and 352 of the IPC relating to alleged injuries to a neighbour. The applicant claimed false implication and asserted that the medical report described …

AMIT AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that once a …

DHARMENDRA KUMAR PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar Pal, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the …

SAVENDRA @ SARVENDRAversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Savendra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The …

RAHUL PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rahul Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High …

DEV NATH RAJBHARversusSTATE OF U,P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Dev Nath Rajbhar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State submitted a charge sheet, but the court was uncertain whether cognizance of the charge sheet had been taken by the trial court. The High Court, noting the existence of an interim …