Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 8801–9000
Shahana and seven others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against their arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioners. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Bafadar who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended that he is innocent, …
The applicants, Kaptan Singh and eleven others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 20‑10‑2021, the cognizance and summoning order dated 10‑02‑2022, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 5209 of 2024 relating to offences under …
Petitioners Byasmuni and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the uncertainty …
The petitioners, tenants, challenged the decree of eviction and rent arrears passed by the Small Causes Court, Kanpur Nagar, seeking supervisory interference under Article 227 of the Constitution. The High Court examined whether any material error, illegality or perversity existed in the lower …
Petitioners Ankita Kannaujia and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the …
Petitioner Lomesh Dutt Sharma filed a writ petition seeking mandamus orders directing the District Magistrate, Meerut, to pay various arrears, gratuity, and a share of GPF amount. The petitioner’s counsel, Mohan Srivastava, who is also the State’s Standing Counsel, requested time to file a fresh …
Petitioners Santosh alias Sunil and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, …
Petitioners Sambhaskar Singh and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and three others. The petition hinged on the failure of mediation between the parties. No counsel appeared on behalf of either side to …
The petitioners, Mohd Danish and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Advocate General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High …
The petitioners, Ghanshyam Das Sharma and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either side to argue the petition. Consequently, the court found no …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, while the State's counsel informed that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the …
Jamuna Prasad and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. Considering the uncertainty and the existence of an …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The Court noted that mediation between the parties had been attempted but failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue the petition. The …
The petitioners, Smt. Gayatri Devi and six others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two other respondents. The parties attempted mediation, which ultimately failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest, but did not appear before the court. The Attorney General for the State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed, though it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Mevalal Prajapati, who was arrested on 19‑Oct‑2025 in connection with the murder of a deceased whose e‑rickshaw and a blood‑stained screwdriver were recovered on the applicant’s pointing out. The prosecution relied on the recovered …
The applicant, Mohd Rahil, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a case arising from alleged offences under several IPC sections. He alleged false implication, claiming the investigation was improper and …
The petitioner, Rakesh Chauhan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, while the Attorney General for the State of Uttar Pradesh informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest, but did not appear before the court. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed, though it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the …
Petitioners Dhirendra Kumar Pandey and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the …
The applicant, Chandra Kumar Mishra, filed a contempt application alleging that the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Varanasi failed to decide Execution Case No. 11 of 2003 within the period directed by the High Court on 4 April 2025. The High Court had ordered the judge to hear applications filed …
The petitioner, Abhinav, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8016 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. After the charge sheet was submitted in the underlying criminal case, the petitioner's counsel, Vivek Kumar Yadav, moved the Court to withdraw the writ petition. The Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. Since the charge sheet existed and the status of …
The applicant, Shivshankar Pal, a Gram Panchayat Adhikari, was arrested for demanding a Rs 10,000 illegal gratification in connection with a Rs 1,25,000 bill, an offence under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. He has been in custody since 21‑01‑2026 and has no prior criminal record. The …
The applicant filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 11‑06‑2021 and the proceedings of case No. 2576 of 2022 (State vs Vindhyachal et al.) arising from a 2018 offence under IPC sections 272, 273 and Excise Act sections 60, 72. The applicant alleged that no offence …
Shivdutt filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7784 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, and the Assistant Government Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial …
Petitioners Rehana Khatun and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but mediation between the parties failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue the petition. The Court observed the lack of representation and, consequently, dismissed the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest, but no counsel appeared for them. The State's Advocate General informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed, though it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 58255/2018) arising from offences under Sections 498(A), 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They asserted that the dispute had been amicably settled by a …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest, but did not appear before the court. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed, though it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the …
The applicant, Sanjay Kumar Sonkar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 2571 of 2019) filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh, which involved offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 406 of the Indian Penal …
The applicant, Syed Reyaz Mahdi, claimed ownership of a shop (CK-67/1-R) and the first floor of a building in Varanasi, seeking protection from demolition under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013. A prior writ petition was disposed, directing that any …
The petitioners, Ajay, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State of U.P. and other respondents had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The petitioners' counsel argued that arrest should …
Petitioners Sudhir Kumar Tiwari and others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that, due to subsequent developments, the petition had become infructuous. The respondents did not object to this submission. The …
The applicant, Pratap Chandra, filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court alleging that the opposite party, Additional District Judge Rahul Singh I, had failed to comply with an order of the writ court. The opposite party submitted instructions indicating that the writ court's …
Petitioners Sarvesh Kumar Sonkar and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioners. The State, through the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether …
M/s Bhagwati Fuels, through its proprietor Gaya Prasad, challenged an order of the Commercial Tax Tribunal that had enhanced the selling rate of its goods and turnover for Assessment Year 2006-07 without any material evidence. The petitioner argued that the Tribunal unjustifiably disbelieved the …
M/S Bhagwati Fuels, through its proprietor Gaya Prasad, filed a Sales/Trade Tax Revision petition (No. 328 of 2017) against the Commissioner of Trade Tax, U.P., Lucknow. The petition was presented before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Court No. 7, with Om Prakash appearing for the …
M/S Bhagwati Fuels, through its proprietor Gaya Prasad, filed a Sales/Trade Tax Revision petition (No. 329 of 2017) before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the Commissioner of Trade Tax, U.P., Lucknow. The petition was argued by counsel Om Prakash for the petitioner and C.S.C. for …
M/S Industrial Fuels Product, through its proprietor Kamlesh Kumar, filed Revision No. 330 of 2017 before the Allahabad High Court challenging a trade tax assessment made by the Commissioner of Trade Tax, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow. The petition sought relief under the provisions governing sales and …
The petitioners, Bhola Nath Yadav and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside an order dated 11 August 2023 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Allahabad, which rejected their application for a stay in Criminal Revision No. 364 of 2023. The petition alleged that …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance order, bailable warrant and non‑bailable warrant dated 4 March 2025 issued by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kanpur Dehat, in S.S.T. No. 82 of 2011 (State of U.P. vs. …
The petitioners, Smt. Sheeba and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …
Rajendra Prasad filed a petition before the Allahabad High Court under Article 227 seeking relief against Yaar Mohammad and others. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel Chandan Sharma, moved the Court to withdraw the petition. The learned Standing Counsel expressed no objection to …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Vijay Kumar @ Billa, who was in custody for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant’s counsel …
The applicant, Shailendra Singh Chauhan, filed a contempt application alleging disturbance of his possession. The State side submitted instructions, and the learned Assistant Chief Standing Counsel, Sri Prabhooti Kant Triapthi, affirmed that the applicant's possession had not been disturbed. The …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sameer @ Mohammad Faiz, who was charged in Crime No. 36 of 2024 under IPC sections 363, 366, 304A, 120B and 201. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that the victim died of a snake bite, that the …
The applicant filed a criminal transfer application before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether a transfer application can be withdrawn at the applicant's request. Applying the procedural rule …
The applicants Diwari Lal and nine others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 3928 of 2021, which stemmed from offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties had entered into a verified compromise deed, which was examined and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a cognizance and summoning order dated 11‑12‑2025, which had directed them to stand trial for offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNSS. They contended that these offences are non‑cognizable and, per …
The applicant, a tenant of shop CK‑42/7 in Dalmandi, Varanasi, feared demolition of his premises due to a road‑widening project and filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus restraining the authorities from dispossessing him without following legal procedure. The High Court, relying on an earlier …
The petitioners, Shivanand Biswash and another, sought full release of a compensation award of Rs.8,00,000 granted by a tribunal on 26-11-2025 after their son died in a railway accident. The tribunal had ordered that only 10% be released immediately, with the remaining 90% to be placed in a fixed …
The petitioner, Komal, suffered a severe railway accident on 27‑06‑2023 resulting in permanent disability and obtained a compensation award of Rs 4,00,000 with interest from the Railway Claims Tribunal on 18‑07‑2025. The Tribunal ordered that only 10% of the amount be released immediately while the …
The petitioners filed a habeas corpus petition to compel the production of the minor child Deepanjali, who was being kept in the custody of a woman named Ram Devi. The Court examined the relationship between Ram Devi and the child and found that Ram Devi was not the biological mother nor the …
M/S Bhagwati Fuels filed a revision petition (No. 389 of 2017) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the assessment made by the Commissioner of Trade Tax, Uttar Pradesh. The petition was argued by counsel Madhav Mani Tripathi, while the Commissioner was represented by C.S.C. Justice Piyush …
The applicants, Saddam Husain and another, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a rape case (Crime No. 179 of 2025). They claimed innocence, alleging that the victim's statement under Section 180 CrPC showed no abduction or rape and that there was no credible …
The appellant Rajkumar Pal filed an appeal under Section 14A‑1 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to quash the Special Sessions Trial No. 23 of 2026 (State v. Rajkumar Pal) that was instituted under Sections 76, 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S. …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 15‑10‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 27‑01‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 39 of 2026 (State v. Hemant & others). The High Court …
The applicant Tushar filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a charge sheet dated 27‑09‑2021 and the cognizance order dated 03‑12‑2022 in State v. Ajay Goswami (Case No. 27644 of 2022), which alleged offences under Sections 323, 325 and 506 of …
The applicant, Pushpendra Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order dated March 2023 in a case involving alleged offences under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant alleged false …
The applicant, Mohammad Sajid Khan, a tenant of Ateek Ahmad, feared demolition of his shop and filed a writ petition which was disposed directing him to seek relief through his landlord. He subsequently filed a contempt application alleging that the district authorities had not acted on his …
Athar Ejaz and others filed a contempt application alleging that the authorities were demolishing their shops in violation of a writ order that required acquisition of land only through mutual consent or under the Right to Fair Compensation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The respondents filed …
The petitioner, Imarti Devi, sought to enforce the payment of consequential benefits that were ordered to be restored after her late husband, Chhote Lal, a Class‑IV employee of the Allahabad High Court, had his punitive order of one‑increment stoppage quashed by the Court in Writ Petition No. 59565 …
The petitioner, a retired Sub Inspector of the Uttar Pradesh Police, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to pay his gratuity, post‑retirement benefits, full pension and arrears that had been withheld due to the pendency of a criminal case (Crime No. 431 of 1996). The …
The applicant, Neeraj Kumar Singh, challenged a State Government order transferring him to the post of Tax Superintendent, arguing that as a Class‑II employee he could not be transferred after the stipulated window without the Chief Minister's approval. The writ court initially stayed the transfer …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 12‑10‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 24‑12‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 342 of 2026 arising from FIR No. 413 of 2025. The High Court …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking correction of a mis‑transcribed section and to challenge the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and related proceedings in Case No. 3848 of 2026 (State vs. Moon Goyal et al.) arising from Crime No. 255 of 2025. The contention was …
The applicants, Ajay Sinha and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 19‑02‑2026 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur, and the entire proceeding in State v. Ajay Sinha (Case No. 3005 of 2026) arising from offences under …
The applicant, Pawan Kumar Jain, filed a civil contempt application (No. 6499 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court alleging that the opposite party, Surendra Prasad Singh, Director Employee State Insurance Scheme, had failed to comply with an order of the writ court. The applicant sought to …
The applicant, Aman Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 26‑12‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 24‑02‑2026, and the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 10345 of 2026) alleging false implication and lack of prima facie …
The revisionist alleged that a group of persons assaulted Sarswati Devi, stole cash and jewellery, and committed trespass on disputed property, filing an application under Section 173(4) CrPC seeking registration of an FIR. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate treated the application as a …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by Vinod Kumar Gupta, who was in custody for offences under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 120‑B and 506 relating to a fraudulent job‑placement scheme. The …
The applicant sought to quash the charge sheet and the magistrate's cognizance order under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, alleging a three‑day delay in filing the FIR and that the investigating officer had not properly inquired before filing the charge sheet. The State opposed the …
Ranvijay Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 39085 of 2025) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh under Sections 406, 419 and 420 of the IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 …
Lal Chandra filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 06.03.2026 of the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Kanpur, which directed maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code in the case Shweta Sen vs Lal Chandra. The revisionist sought to set aside that order and …
The applicant, Hari Narayan Rai, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 3372 of 2018) initiated by the State of U.P. The case involved charges under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant contended that …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the accused Dhaniram, who was charged in Crime No. 29 of 2017 under IPC sections 411, 413, 414 and 420. The applicant contended that he was falsely …
The petitioner, Mukesh Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh to decide his representation dated 28 October 2023, which sought adjustment under Rule 41(h) of the Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 2021. The petitioner relied on an earlier order …
Devanand Goswami filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 7‑8‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 15‑9‑2025 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 3rd, Prayagraj in case 443 of 2025. The applicant contended that the offences alleged under Sections 352 …
The applicants, Avdhesh Kumar and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Pankaj Kumar Mishra, sought permission to withdraw the application, citing that the trial court had already proceeded to frame …
The applicant, Smt. Madhu, filed an application under Section 173(4) of the BNSS challenging an order dated 30.01.2026 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad, which had rejected her application. The High Court noted a preliminary objection raised by the learned Additional Government …
Bhim Sen filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 67251 of 2014) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the parties, though the State's standing counsel was present. The Court noted the lack of prosecution of the petition. Consequently, …
The appellant, a Junior Engineer of the Distribution Corporation, was suspended on 19‑Feb‑2026 for alleged negligence without a prior inquiry. He challenged the suspension, arguing that the charges were minor, did not warrant a major penalty, and that his continued service would not prejudice the …
Petitioner Anand Prakash filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel, Arpit Malviya, submitted that the petition had become infructuous and should be dismissed. The respondents' counsel, Anil Kumar Singh Baghel, did not oppose this …
The applicant, Ajay Shekhar Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 30‑04‑2025 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, in a case arising from a 1999 FIR under IPC sections 457, 411 and 380. The High Court examined the …
The applicants Subhash Kumar, Ram Kripal and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quash of a chargesheet dated 18‑04‑2024, the cognizance order dated 08‑04‑2025, and the entire proceedings of State v. Subhash Kumar (Case No. 652 of 2025) …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Pawan Yadav, who is charged under Sections 8, 20 and 60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act in a case registered at Mirzapur. The applicant argued that he is innocent, has no prior criminal record, and that the trial is …
The petitioner, Subhadra Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and police to conduct a free, fair, and time-bound investigation of an FIR dated 19-12-2025 (Case Crime No. 0266 of 2025) under Sections 318(4), 324(4) and 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Atul Kumar Singh, who is charged under Sections 13(1)(b) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for possessing assets disproportionate to his known income (Rs 73,44,894). No arrest was made during the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gagan, who was arrested in connection with Crime No.02 of 2026 under IPC sections 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and his alleged role was limited to "catching hold" …
The applicants Murari Lal and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 08.01.2025 and a cognizance order dated 01.05.2025 in Crime No. 320 of 2024. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 61(2), 351(2) and 351(3) of the …
The applicants, Praneeta and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 24‑07‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 06‑01‑2026 in State vs Praneeta et al. (Case No. 84 of 2026). They contended that the offences alleged – Sections 115(2), …
The applicant, a tenant of a shop in Varanasi, feared demolition of his premises and filed a writ petition seeking to quash government orders and obtain compensation and rehabilitation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The High Court, relying on the decision in …
The applicant, Lucky, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking a direction that the trial courts allow a single surety bond for four separate criminal cases, relying on a Supreme Court decision in Hani Nishad v. State of U.P. The State opposed the prayer. The court noted that the …
The revision petition filed by Priyanka Kumari and another against Vishwanth Singh and others was heard before Hon'ble Justice Abdul Shahid. The court examined the office report which indicated that the revision was not maintainable. Relying on the precedent set in Jupiter Chit Fund (Pvt.) Ltd. v. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhinav Singh (also known as Dr. Rajiv Gupta) in Crime No. 1422 of 2025, where he was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged forgery and related offences. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, that …
The petitioner, Amar Singh Yadav, was appointed as a constable in the Uttar Pradesh Police on 1 February 1982 but was terminated on 26 June 1982. He was reinstated on 4 May 1991 by a government order that treated the intervening period as extraordinary leave, with the condition that he would not …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of accused Chand Mohammad, who was detained in connection with Crime No. 196 of 2025 involving offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 333, 109(1) and 351(2) …
The applicants Roshan Lal and others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 08‑10‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 28‑11‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 3534 of 2025. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the …
The appellant Amir Hasan appealed against the denial of bail in a case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, where the victim, an 18‑year‑old woman, alleged that he had threatened and raped her. The appellant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 06-10-2023, the cognizance and summoning order dated 20-12-2024, and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 7225 of 2024 (State vs. Arvind Yadav and others) relating to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Netrapal alias Sunny, who was charged under Sections 115(2), 109(1), 351(3) and 352 of the B.N.S. for an alleged knife assault. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR and injured’s statement only ascribed a general role to …
The applicant, Kailash Giri, filed an application before the Allahabad High Court under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Subsequently, the applicant expressed a desire not to pursue the application and sought its withdrawal. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted a request to …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire proceedings of State vs. Ramprakash Yadav (Case No.4732 of 2020) involving offences under several IPC sections and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Act. The High Court examined the FIR, the …
The applicant, Ashfak, filed a civil contempt application (No. 2400 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court against respondents Ashutosh Kumar Dwivedi and another. The applicant alleged that the respondents had failed to comply with an order of the writ court. Counsel for the applicant, Rajneesh …
The applicant, Dharmendra, filed a civil contempt application (No. 2404 of 2026) against Ashutosh Kumar Dwivedi and another, alleging non‑compliance with a writ court order. The applicant was represented by counsel Rajneesh Kumar Singh. The respondent had no counsel appearing. The court was informed …
Shahnoor Ali filed a civil contempt application (No. 2405 of 2026) against Ashutosh Kumar Dwivedi and another, alleging non-compliance with a writ court order. The applicant was represented by counsel Rajneesh Kumar Singh, while no counsel appeared for the opposite parties. The learned judge …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 28.05.2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 04.11.2025, and the entire proceedings in State v. Jagdeesh and others (Case No. 156601 of 2025). The court examined the …
The revisionist, Devendra Singh, filed a criminal revision seeking to set aside a family court order dated 09.03.2026 that secured amounts deducted in an execution case. He contended that earlier maintenance orders under Section 125 Cr.P.C. had been enhanced under Section 127 Cr.P.C., and he was …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ramesh Shah, who was arrested in a narcotics case involving 20.8 kg of ganja recovered from a vehicle he was traveling in. The applicant contended that he …
Ranjeet Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 02.05.2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 05.08.2025 in Criminal Case No. 5226 of 2025, where he was charged under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant …
Smt. Chitrarekha filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 13‑03‑2024 issued in State v. Sunita (Case No.01 of 2007). She limited her prayer to obtaining a direction that, if she surrenders within three weeks and applies for …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Kishor, who was arrested in connection with a 2021 incident and charged under IPC sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B. The applicant argued that the …
The applicants, Furqan and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 23772 of 2025) arising from FIR No. 193 of 2022 alleging offences under Sections 307, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The High Court examined the FIR, …
Shravan Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking quashment of an FIR dated 18.03.2026 registered under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities Act, 1986. He contended that a single criminal case cannot sustain …
The applicant, Pradeep Chauhan, sought bail in a murder case (Criminal No. 118 of 2024) charged under Sections 302, 120‑B and 34 of the IPC. He argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the CCTV footage showing him was recorded before the FIR was lodged, creating doubt about the prosecution’s …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Saurabh Singh, who was arrested in a police encounter and charged under Section 140(2) of the B.N.S. for alleged abduction and ransom. Singh claimed he was falsely implicated, noting that the victim’s statement under Section 183 was never …
The applicant, Sonu Tiwari, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the order dated 30 July 2024 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhadohi, and the entire proceedings in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments …
The applicants, Zeeshan and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order dated 13‑11‑2025 that rejected their discharge application in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 325 and 308 IPC. They alleged false implication, collusion …
The applicant, Umesh Chandra Yadav, sought to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in a criminal case where he was implicated under Section 447 IPC for criminal trespass. He argued that the U.P. Amendment Act, 1961 makes prior written notice under the amended Section 441 IPC mandatory before a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Roshan Kumar in a cyber‑crime case (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 14920 of 2025) involving alleged offences under several IPC sections and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act, 2005. The applicant argued that he was …
Petitioners Shakti Singh and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the continuation of proceedings after the investigation had been completed and a charge-sheet filed on 06-04-2026. The State, through its Additional Government Advocate, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 18553/2022) arising from allegations under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 406, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had settled their dispute through the …
Petitioner Mahendra Pal filed a writ petition seeking to quash an order dated 31.03.2026 issued by the Chief Medical Officer, Banda, which had terminated his services. The Court, following its earlier direction, considered an order dated 23.04.2026 wherein the petitioner was reinstated on a …
The petitioner, M/s Ashok Kumar Gooliyaan, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition on the ground of drafting defects and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The respondents did not oppose the withdrawal. The …
Meena Devi filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The Attorney General informed the court that a re‑investigation had been completed and a final report was submitted on 26 December 2024. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Arshad, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8795 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that he no longer wishes to pursue the petition and seeks its withdrawal. …
The applicants, Sukha and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 28‑11‑2025 and a cognizance order dated 23‑03‑2026 in State vs Sukha (Case No. 229 of 2026). They contended that the offences alleged—Sections 324(4), 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 12‑11‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 01‑01‑2026, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 48 of 2026 arising from FIR charges under IPC sections 110, 118(1), …
The petitioner, Hari Ram, filed a writ petition seeking payment of his pension based on his last drawn salary of Rs.64,100 and interest on delayed payments. The respondents had already refunded Rs.5,99,820 recovered from his post-retirement benefits and revised his pension, but the amount …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Smt Chhavi, who is the sister‑in‑law of a deceased person alleged to have been murdered. The applicant claimed the death was a suicide, citing the post‑mortem report showing a hanging with no other injuries and an intact hyoid bone, and argued …
The petitioner, Shyam Sundar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Gorakhpur to decide Appeal No. 0162 of 2025 (Gajendranath Mishra vs. Shyam Sundar) under Section 11(1) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953. The petitioner alleged …
The applicants, Arun Kumar and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 19‑09‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 06‑03‑2025, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 2014 of 2026 (State v. Vikas et al.) …
The applicants, Smt Rashmi Saxena and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance‑summoning order dated 29‑04‑2025 in Criminal Case No.1394 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The …
The petitioners, the State and four officials, challenged a judgment of the State Public Service Tribunal that allowed the claim of a deceased employee’s legal representatives for promotion. The petitioners argued that the employee had refused to exercise an option for promotion and that there was …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Mithun Rikasan, who was arrested under Section 143(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 for alleged child‑trafficking. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated and that the children’s statements indicated they were taken to Punjab for …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 07-08-2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 05-02-2026, and the entire proceedings of case No. 2451 of 2026 arising from FIR containing offences under various IPC …
The applicant, Javed Akhtar, sought contempt proceedings against the District Magistrate and other officials, alleging that the State had failed to demolish his shop despite a pending road‑widening project. The High Court noted that the applicant had previously been a party to Writ‑C No. 41227/2025, …
The applicant, Javed Akhtar, who was a party to Writ‑C No. 46093 of 2025 concerning the proposed widening of Dal Mandi road in Varanasi, sought a contempt order after the Varanasi Development Authority (VDA) issued a notice on 23‑Apr‑2026. The earlier writ was disposed on 22‑Jan‑2026, relying on …
The applicant, a tenant, feared demolition of his rented house and filed Writ‑C No.113 of 2026, which was disposed with a direction to approach the landlord and the competent authority for relief. The applicant subsequently filed a contempt application alleging non‑compliance with that direction, …
The petitioner, Manraj Meena, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8831 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The respondent's Additional Government Advocate (AGA) raised no objection to the …
The petitioner, Dileep Vishwakarma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and sought liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The State’s Additional …
The petitioner, Satya Prakash Singh, filed Writ No. 18019 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the Union of India and two other respondents. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner’s counsel identified certain discrepancies in the writ petition. Consequently, …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order directing respondents No.2 and No.3 to demolish an alleged illegal construction on a public road, relying on an annexure purported to be a map. The court observed that the annexure was merely an authorization for filing the …
Petitioners Amit Saraswat and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No parties appeared to argue the case despite a revised call, though the standing counsel was present. The Court observed the lack of prosecution and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. …
The petitioner sought a direction to restrain the Gram Pradhan from constructing a road over Plot No. 615, recorded as Banjar land in Village Dhaneli, Bareilly, alleging misappropriation of Gaon Sabha funds and lack of public benefit. The respondents produced a Deputy District Magistrate's …
The petitioners, Nivas Ali and another, filed a writ petition (C No. 34330 of 2014) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The matter was listed under the "Oldest Pending Cases" priority hearing, but the petitioners failed to appear even after a revised call. The State respondents, …
Petitioner Kamrun Nisha filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The …
Mohd. Akram filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8817 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings against him. The State had already concluded its investigation and forwarded a charge sheet against the petitioner on 5 December 2025. The petitioner, through counsel, …
Petitioners Parvez and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 12‑03‑2026 registered under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the BNS, 2023. The State argued that the investigation was complete, a charge‑sheet had been filed under Section 193(3) of the BNS …
Mool Chandra (Petitioner) filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Ghaziabad to decide Application No. 6G(2) under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, along with Original Suit No. 1338 of 2023, within a …
The petitioner, Arshad @ Mohd Arshed, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8818 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. While the petition was pending, the petitioner was arrested and, through his counsel, expressed that he no longer …
Petitioner Om Prakash Maurya filed Writ‑A No. 5519 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and four other respondents. The petition was argued by senior counsel Hritudhwaj Pratap Sahi and Samarath Singh for the petitioner and by C.S.C. and Manish Nath …
The petitioner, Ajay, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8851 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging a matter against the State of U.P. and two others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition …
The petitioner, Dilshad, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8868 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mohd. Shahibe Alam, informed the Court that the petitioner no longer …
Bhim Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and others to allot him his 50% share of a disputed land parcel, amounting to 285.25 square meters and a monetary sum of Rs 62,75,500, based on a Supreme Court order in his brother Pratap Singh's case. He relied …
The petitioner, Saiyyed Wahid Ali, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the petitioner’s counsel, Tarun Pratap Singh, informed the court that due to later developments, no cause of action remained and the petitioner wished to withdraw the case. The State of U.P. and …
The applicant Arvind Kumar sought cancellation of bail that had been granted to the second opposite party in a criminal case under Sections 109(1), 333 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The bail was originally ordered by the Sessions Judge, Saharanpur on 1 Oct 2025. After hearing, counsel for the applicant, …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Km. Shiwani in Criminal Case No. 44 of 2026, which alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S. The applicant contended that she was falsely implicated due to a matrimonial dispute and that she is the unmarried sister‑in‑law …
Alimaan Khan applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 405 of 2020) involving offences under Sections 363, 366, 376, 323, 346 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the victim, who was 16 at the time of the alleged offence, had …
A bail application was filed in Criminal Case No. 612 of 2025, which involved charges under Sections 318(4), 351(3), 308(5), 115(2), 127(4) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code at Meerganj Police Station, Bareilly. The applicant sought enlargement of bail during the pendency of the trial. Counsel for …
Anand filed a criminal revision under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code alleging that his deceased sister had been kidnapped and forced into marriage, and that the opposite parties had threatened his life. The Judicial Magistrate rejected the application, directing a preliminary police …
The petitioners sought interim protection against a sale deed prepared by the executing court after a decree in Civil Suit No. 41 of 1987. Their objection under Section 47 of the CPC to the execution was rejected, leading them to file a revision, which was entertained but only notices were issued …
Petitioner Mukesh Sharma filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the respondent's counsel raised no objection. The court considered the petitioner's request and the lack of …
The petitioner, Suraj Sharma, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8792 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel stated that he does not wish to pursue the present petition and seeks to withdraw it, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition …
The petitioners, Mahaveer Arya and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 8862 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The State had already concluded its investigation and filed a charge‑sheet against the petitioners. While the petitioners did not contest these facts, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Firoz, who was charged under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 of the Animal Cruelty Act for allegedly transporting three cows in a bolero …
The petitioner, Govind Enterprises, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 17‑04‑2025 issued by the Executive Officer of Nagar Panchayat Bansgaon and a mandamus directing payment as recommended by the Executive Engineer, PWD. The petitioner claimed that a representation …
Petitioners Dev Singh and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to grant them compensation and benefits recommended by the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Committee in its report dated 03‑03‑2023 under the Right to Fair …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mukesh, who was arrested in a case involving multiple serious offences under the same Act and the Aadhar Card Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he was …
The petitioner, Pradyumn Gupta, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet against him. The State had already completed investigation and forwarded the charge sheet on 12-11-2025. The petitioner did not contest this fact but expressed his intention to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Asif Khan, who was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 192 of 2025) based solely on a co-accused's statement, as his name was absent from the FIR. The applicant argued that the statement was unreliable and there was no corroborative evidence …
The applicant, Hemant Kumar Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash non‑bailable warrant orders dated 07.03.2026 and 25.03.2026 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhansi, in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments …
Petitioner Shruti Mishra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner informed the court that she had already been arrested by the police and no longer wished to pursue the petition, seeking to withdraw it. The respondent State and …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The respondent’s counsel and the Additional Government Advocate for the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunil Gupta, accused in a dowry‑death case where his wife was found hanged. The applicant claimed the death was a suicide, citing a compromise agreement dated 11‑07‑2025 and a post‑mortem report showing no injuries other than the ligature mark. …
Subhan Khan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 130 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 310(2) and 317(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that he was not named in the First Information Report (FIR) and that the FIR was lodged eight days after the alleged …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Azamgarh, to decide a pending title revision case (Case No.1327 of 2025) filed under Section 48(1) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act. The petitioner alleged that the case, filed on 22 …
The Allahabad High Court considered the bail application of Awdhesh Kumar, accused in a murder case (Crime No. 407 of 2025). The applicant contended that the FIR was based on mere apprehension, no one witnessed the incident, and the recovered blood‑stained knife was false because the procedure under …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 8864 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the investigation had been concluded and a final report favorable to them had been submitted, and they …
The petitioner, Dhanraj @ Vijay, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings initiated by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The court noted that the investigation was already completed and a charge sheet had been filed, leading the magistrate to …
The petitioners, Satya Prakash Sharma and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the filing of a charge sheet dated 2 February 2021. The State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents opposed the petition. During the hearing, the …
Vijay Pal filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Consolidation Officer of Sonupar, Basti to dispose of case No.69 under Section 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation Holding Act, 1953, which had been pending for more than 24 years following a remand order dated 8 April 2002. The …
The petitioner, Shiv Brick Field, filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 25 February 2025 issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax (U.P.G.S.T.) Act, 2017. The petition raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner had an alternative …
Petitioner Shri Jagpal Singh filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (South), Meerut, to release Rs. 4,00,000 that had been fixed and deposited by the Tribunal in Motor Accident Claim No. 99 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the Tribunal should be compelled …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jitendra Fauji @ Abhishek, who had been in custody since March 6, 2026 in connection with a case involving alleged assault on five persons under several sections of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR did not …
The petitioners Mahesh Kumar Gupta and two others filed Writ Petition No. 1758 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Shrawan Kumar Pandey, submitted that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn. The court took note of this submission. Accordingly, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Roshan Gupta, who was arrested in a narcotics case under Sections 8, 21 and 23 of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 50 bottles each of Diazepam, Buprenorphine and …
The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge-sheet in a case where he was wrongly named in the FIR. The State informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 17-04-2026. The petitioner did …
Badshah Traders challenged an adjudication order dated 21‑02‑2025 issued after its GST registration was suspended on 09‑07‑2025. The show‑cause notice was served electronically via the Common Portal, despite the registration cancellation which, according to the respondents, should have required …
Petitioner Bharat Bhushan Tyagi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shekhar Singh under Section 2(B)(i) 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, relating to Crime No. 70 of 2026. The applicant, already on bail in six other cases, argued he was not a gang member and posed no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jagpal Singh, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 48 of 2026) involving alleged assault on five persons under several sections of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, had no specific role in the FIR, and …
The applicant, Pankaj, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and cognizance/summoning order dated 09.12.2024 in Criminal Case No.18513 of 2024, where he was charged under Sections 420, 406 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 420 …
The applicant, Mukesh Patel, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of Session Trial No. 223 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 325, 308 and 304 of the IPC. The FIR was lodged in 2024 and the charge was …
The High Court, while disposing of a writ petition concerning road widening, examined a contempt application filed by Rajesh Kumar Gandhi alleging illegal demolition of his house without notice. The court noted that the house had been sold by its owners to the Public Works Department on 14 January …
The petitioners challenged a Government Order dated 31.03.2025 authorising road widening in Varanasi, alleging that the State was threatening demolition of their properties without proper acquisition. The High Court earlier directed that any acquisition must be through mutual consent or under the …
