Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 9201–9400

SWAPNENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Swapnendra Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of a pending criminal trial (Sessions Case No. 615 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 364 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued …

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF UP AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Badalapur, Jaunpur to decide a stay application filed on 21‑08‑2025 in a declaratory suit under section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The stay application had remained pending despite several …

ANSAR AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ansar Ahmad, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bail and Security of the State (BNSS) Act seeking to quash the summons, warrant and the entire criminal proceeding (Complaint No.27 of 2025) initiated under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He contended that the …

DEVENDRA SINGH AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Nine petitioners, all Head Masters, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the District Basic Education Officer (respondent No.5) to pay them the promotional increment and arrears with interest. The respondents indicated no objection to the petitioners filing fresh individual …

MOHAMMAD RASHIDversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Mohammad Rashid applied for renewal of passport No. P4039809, but the Regional Passport Officer, Lucknow, failed to issue the passport citing a pending criminal case against him. He filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to renew his passport and to decide his …

GAURAV GOYALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Gaurav Goyal filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mathura, to frame charges and expedite the disposal of State vs. Ajay Kumar Jain (Case No. 3155 of 2019) arising from a 2013 FIR involving offences …

FAIZ KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Faiz Khan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed on 5 May 2026. The Court noted that …

SHESHNATH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sheshnath Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Deoria to decide a restoration application filed in 2022 under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the Tehsildar had not …

VINOD KUMAR @ VINOD KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vinod Kumar, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State and other respondents to remove alleged illegal encroachments on public utility land in Mahua Kheda village, Agra. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an …

ANKUR TYAGIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ankur Tyagi, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, argued …

RAMVEER AND 2 OTHERSversusYOGENDRA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) in Aligarh decide an application filed under Order 39 Rule 2A of the CPC in Misc. Case No. 236 of 2023, arising from an original suit, within a stipulated period to avoid irreparable loss. …

AMIT GANGWARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Amit Gangwar was charged under sections of the BNS Act, the POCSO Act, and the IT Act for alleged sexual offences. After two earlier bail applications were denied, he filed a third bail petition claiming the parties had settled the matter and would marry. The State opposed, highlighting that the …

SABHA SHANKAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to enforce an order dated 21‑10‑2024 issued under Section 67(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which directed the eviction of illegal encroachments from plot no. 392 in Village Tisaura, Varanasi. The petitioner alleged that …

RAMRATANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner of Azamgarh Division to decide appeal No. 441/2023 (Ravikant Pathak v. Subash) pending under Section 38(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 since April 2023. The petitioner argued that despite several dates being fixed, …

PUSHPENDRA SINGH RATHAURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to demolish a building alleged to be illegally constructed and dilapidated, claiming it posed a danger to road users. The petition relied solely on the petitioner's personal complaints, with no material evidence or objections …

NARENDER PAL CHAUHAN AND ANOTHERversusSMT. POOJA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Narender Pal Chauhan and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Hapur, to decide an application (paper no. 6C) filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC in Suit No. 02 of 2026. The petition alleged that …

MUKESH NISHADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mukesh Nishad, who was arrested in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

RAJESH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajesh Kumar Singh, who was arrested under Section 2/3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had no gang affiliation, and was already on bail in another …

NIRANJAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Niranjan Singh, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false …

PAWAN KUMARversusASHOK AND 6 OTHERS

Pawan Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Court No.18, Deoria, to decide an objection he raised on 06.03.2026 against an interim injunction granted under Order 39 Rule 1 of the CPC and an ex‑parte order dated 31.01.2026 in Civil Suit …

LOK PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Lok Pal Singh, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16 May 2024 issued by the District Cane Officer, Bulandshahr, which rejected his claim for medical reimbursement of Rs.86,291 on the ground that the bills were not submitted within the prescribed three‑month period. The …

KRISHNA PALversusDISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BUDAUN AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Krishna Pal, filed a writ petition (Writ No. 18007 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the District Magistrate, Budaun and others. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel sought to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue any other …

ANIL KUMAR YADAVversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner applied for renewal of his passport, but the Regional Passport Officer in Lucknow refused to issue it, citing a pending criminal case against him. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the officer to issue the passport. The Court referred to its earlier …

MOHAMMAD UMARversusMOHAMMAD JUVAIR AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Mohammad Umar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) at Pharenda, Maharajganj, to decide an application filed under Order 39 Rule 1/2 of the Code of Civil Procedure in original suit No. 554 of 2025. The petition sought an expeditious …

ARADHANAversusPRABHAKAR PATEL

The petitioner Aradhana filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No.5, Allahabad, to decide her pending civil suit (Case No. 2292 of 2025) within the stipulated time. The petitioner’s counsel requested an expeditious disposal …

MOHD KADIRversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Mohd Kadir, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) of the BNS and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act. The applicant had not approached the …

RAVI KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ravi Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 23 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 64, 69 and 115(2) of the BNS. The FIR was lodged more than three months after the alleged incident, which the court noted as an inordinate delay. The victim, a married woman, was said to …

ANITA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Anita Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Nayab Tehsildar of Chandauli to decide her restoration suit (RST/2999 of 2025) filed under Section 209(h) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged that the application had been pending since 2025 despite several …

DINESH MISHRAversusSURESH MISHRA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dinesh Mishra, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the lower court to decide a 7C application filed under Order 39 Rule 1 of the CPC, which arose from Original Suit No.87 of 2026. The High Court observed that the underlying suit was still pending and that …

NAJAKATversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Najakat, who was implicated in a case under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act for the alleged recovery of 30 cows. The applicant argued that he was not named …

CHANCHAL SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Chanchal Sharma, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner requested that the petition be dismissed on the ground that the petitioner retained the liberty to approach the concerned authority. The Court agreed with this …

MOHAMMAD ASIFversusTEHSEEM AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Mohammad Asif filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Meerut, to decide Motor Accident Claim No. 168 of 2024 (Asif v. Tehseem & others) within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the claim was pending and required …

RAHUL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ of certiorari under Article 226 to quash an order dated 15.04.2026 passed by the District Magistrate, Bijnor, invoking Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act in a debt recovery case. The respondents argued that the High Court should not interfere with actions of a private bank …

RAM SAJEEVANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ram Sajeevan filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Chayal, to implement a prior directive dated 18‑02‑2025 and to conclude pending proceedings under Section 24(3) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the …

IRSHADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Irshad, sought bail in a rape case (Crime No. 30 of 2026) filed under Sections 64(2)M and 351(3) of the BNS. The prosecution alleged that Irshad, the brother‑in‑law of the victim, raped her and impregnated her, leading to a terminated pregnancy. The defence argued that the FIR omitted …

DINESH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Dinesh Kumar Singh filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Superintendent of Police, Chandauli, to pass an order on his representation for payment of wages for the period 19-02-2026 to 28-02-2026, alleging illegal non‑payment on the ground of alleged non‑attendance. He relied on …

MOHD AMIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Mohd Amir, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 23 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The court noted that the victim's statement under Section 183 BNSS suggested consent, as she had accompanied …

RAJESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Rajesh Kumar, a junior engineer, was arrested under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding a higher amount than the prescribed compounding fee. He has been in custody since 22 January 2026, while his co‑accused has already been released on bail. The State opposed bail …

RAMASHRAY SAHUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ramashray Sahu, filed an application under Section 529 of the Negotiable Instruments Act before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 10, Azamgarh, to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 7324/2023) filed under Section …

ARIF KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Arif Khan, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an order directing the Special Judge (DAA) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑social Activities Act, Hamirpur, to expedite the trial of criminal miscellaneous case No. 113 of 2025 (State v. …

AMIRversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Amir, who was charged under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act in a case registered in 2025. Amir claimed innocence, stating that no narcotics were recovered from his …

MOHAMMAD NIYAMAT ALI KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Mohammad Niyamat Ali Khan filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by the Varanasi Development Authority under Section 27 of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 and another notice under Section 331(1)(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1959. The …

M/S SHREE DALVEER CONTRACTOR AND SUPPLIERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

M/s Shree Dalveer Contractor and Supplier challenged the cancellation of its registration under the U.P. GST Act, 2017 by an order dated 08.08.2024, which was based on a system‑generated notice dated 08.07.2024. The petition argued that the notice, lacking the name, office and digital signature of …

LALU SONKAR @ ANILversusSMT. MEENA SONKAR

The petitioner, Lalu Sonkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Varanasi to decide a temporary injunction application filed by the respondent, Meena Sonkar, in suit O.S. 2880 of 2024. The petitioner argued that the injunction …

VAISHALI EXPORT HOUSEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vaishali Export House, sought a refund of road tax paid on a vehicle (Regn. No. UP 21 CZ 8009) after the Government decided on June 28, 2024 to exempt certain hybrid electric vehicles from road tax. The learned Standing Counsel highlighted this exemption, establishing that the tax …

DEVKARAN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Devkaran and four others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Presiding Officer of the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Authority (LARRA), Gautam Budh Nagar, to decide Execution Case No. 31 of 2022 (Manoj Kumar & Others vs State of U.P.) …

SMT JAY DEVI SHUKLAversusBASANT KUMAR MISHRA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Jay Devi Shukla, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Jaunpur to decide the original suit No. 961/2013 against Basant Kumar Mishra and others within a stipulated time. The petition alleged that the lower court had …

PANKAJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Pankaj, sought bail in a dowry‑related murder case (Crime No. 540 of 2024) alleging that his wife’s death was a suicide precipitated by depression after the loss of their two children. The FIR, filed by the deceased’s father, accused Pankaj of torturing his wife to demand a motorcycle …

NAFEES AHMAD ANSARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Nafees Ahmad Ansari challenged an order dated 12‑04‑2026 that deputed him to Census 2027 training and duty despite his representation seeking exemption on personal hardship grounds. He argued that the order violated Section 27 of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, …

PANKAJ GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the proceedings of Special Case No. 405 of 2018, which arose from a criminal case under IPC sections 354, 504, 506 and POCSO Act sections 7/8, and to set aside a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) and the proceedings under …

ABHISHEK KUMARversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

Abhishek Kumar filed a review application after his writ petition was dismissed on 25 July 2025. He relied on a communication dated 2 December 2025 from the Additional Director, Medical Health and Family Welfare, which suggested that a medical certificate used by respondent No.5 was doubtful because …

SANJAY KUMARversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a retired Sub‑Inspector, challenged an order dated 29‑03‑2025 that revised his salary retroactively and ordered recovery of alleged excess pay without any notice or hearing. He argued that the excess payment stemmed from a governmental mistake made many years earlier and that …

KUNWAR GYANENDRA PAL SINGHversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, a retired Sub‑Inspector, challenged a 2025 order that retrospectively revised his salary from 2012 without notice, which consequently reduced his pension. He argued that no fraud or misrepresentation was involved and that the State could not recover excess salary paid more than a …

K.P. SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to execute an eviction order dated 18‑06‑2024 passed by the Tehsildar under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which had been confirmed by the Collector. The petitioners alleged that the order had not been …

ANIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Anit Kumar, an officiating Headmaster at Shaheed Udham Singh Junior High School since 1 April 2025, filed a writ petition seeking the grant of Headmaster pay scale benefits and arrears, alleging that his claim was pending before the District Basic Education Officer (respondent No.3). The petitioner …

HARDEOversusKHALIL AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Hardeo, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Kasya Kushinagar to decide the pending suit No. 69/2014 against Khalil and others within a stipulated period. The petitioner’s counsel, Omkar Nath Rai, argued that the suit …

RAM PRAKASH SEXENAversusHOME GUARD DHARMPAL AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant's father, Net Ram, obtained an interim order in Writ Petition No. 9808 of 1985 that barred his eviction from a disputed land. The applicant alleges that the opposite parties are attempting to dispossess him of the property. The contempt respondents were not parties to the original writ …

AADESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Aadesh Singh, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …

ANIL KAPOORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Anil Kapoor, filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the summoning order dated 02‑04‑2025 in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, alleging that he never issued the cheque in question because the bank had merged. The court held that the factual …

SMT SALONI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, their counsel expressed a desire not to pursue the petition further and requested its dismissal as not pressed. The Court accepted this request, dismissing the petition on the ground that it was not pressed, …

SMT NEELAM @ VRIJ LATAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt Neelam @ Vrij Lata, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking expeditious disposal of a Miscellaneous Matrimonial case (No. 86 of 2019) arising from a matrimonial original suit. The underlying matter involved an execution application under …

PAWAN KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Pawan Kumar Yadav, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case involving Sections 3(5), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of the BNS and Section 66D of the IT Act. The FIR alleged …

CHATURBHUJI MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Chaturbhuji Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 593 of 2025, which arose from a charge under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act (Amendment) 2003 relating to alleged …

NOORUDDINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Nooruddin, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Varanasi, to decide an interim injunction application (6-C) in Original Suit No. 1426 of 2024 within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that the pending application …

YUNISH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Yunish Kumar, filed an application under Section 529 seeking the High Court’s intervention for the speedy disposal of his pending criminal complaint (Case No. 1187 of 2018) before the Civil Judge (F.T.C.) in Firozabad. The applicant argued that the case had been lingering without …

TARUN ANAND AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 (RERA) to expedite the handover of possession of a unit and to return delay interest in a complaint. The petition alleged that the application filed on 20.01.2026 was pending. Respondent No.2 contended that the hearing on …

S/S UNIVERSAL ENTERPRISESversusTHE COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAX UP LUCKNOW

S/S Universal Enterprises, a fuel‑wood dealer, challenged a best‑judgment assessment for AY 2016‑17 under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008. The assessing authority had rejected the assessee’s books and enhanced tax liability solely on information that a third‑party firm, S.S. Enterprises, …

PRADEEP KUMAR VISHWAKARMAversusMEENU VISHWAKARMA

Petitioner Pradeep Kumar Vishwakarma filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Ghazipur, to decide the pending matrimonial suit (Case No. 187 of 2023) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner argued that the suit …

RACHANAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rachana, who had been in custody since 15 April 2026 for alleged participation in a stone‑throwing incident that injured two police officers. The FIR named 36 …

MOHAMMAD SHAMSHER @ SHAMSEERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Mohammad Shamsher, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case registered under Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. He claimed innocence, argued that he had been in custody since March 6, 2026, and …

AMAN MINORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a 17‑year‑old minor, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of the FIR alleging that he had taken away the prosecutrix, also a minor, by blandishment and attempted to molest her. The FIR described that the prosecutrix was taken away almost by force and that …

SURYA NATH RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Surya Nath Ram, filed a public interest litigation challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others, alleging violation of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The Court observed that the petitioner’s own …

OSAMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Osama, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashment of an FIR dated 22 April 2026 that alleged his involvement in an assault on an informant. The FIR, registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, described a severe assault resulting …

ABBAS KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking an order to halt construction of a poultry farm, relying on a July 5, 2025 report by the Chief Veterinary Officer that the farm would cause pollution. The petition did not cite any specific statutory provision, rule, or guideline governing …

AZEEZURRAHMANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Azeezurrahman, filed a public‑interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State authorities to remove an alleged illegal encroachment on Gata No. 234, recorded as Pokhari land in Hengaipur, Azamgarh, and to protect the public‑utility land from further …

BABULALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Babulal, challenged the initiation of a revenue case (Case No. 5206 of 2025) against him before the Tehsildar of Mahawan, alleging that the proceeding was instituted under Section 26 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 without jurisdiction and was non‑maintainable. He sought a writ of …

SMT. NANCY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Rajesh Kumar Pandey, informed the court that the petitioners no longer wish to pursue the writ and requested its dismissal. The court considered the request to withdraw the petition. It held that the petition could …

ASHISH KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusBANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ashish Kumar and three others, filed a writ petition seeking regularisation of their appointments as Junior Clerk Level‑II at Banaras Hindu University. They specifically pressed the first part of the second prayer, asking that their claim be considered for regularisation. The …

IKRAM @ KALEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Ikram @ Kale, who was named in an FIR under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act as a supplier of cattle meat. The applicant claimed false …

ASHOK KUMAR RAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Ashok Kumar Rai filed a writ petition challenging a recovery order dated 03.08.2024 issued by the Commandant of the 39th Vahini, P.A.C., Mirzapur. The recovery order was passed after a show‑cause notice dated 24.07.2024 was issued and received by the petitioner on 25.07.2024, to which the …

MOIN ABBAS ZAIDI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the summoning order issued by a Judicial Magistrate and the revision order of an Additional Sessions Judge in a dowry case involving sections 498A, 323 IPC and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry …

SITA RAM GUPTAversusSHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG

The applicant, Sita Ram Gupta, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 27.01.2026 in Writ Petition No. 56746 of 2013. The order was served on the opposite party on …

AJIT @ SONU AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, who are in‑laws of the opposite party, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the entire proceedings in a domestic‑violence case (Smt. Anita v. Yogesh & Ors.) pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Saharanpur. The opposite party had earlier obtained …

VNBP SHIKSHA SEVA SAMITIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, VNBP Shiksha Seva Samiti, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to decide a pending mutation case (Case No. 3881 of 2024) concerning land in Gorakhpur. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the …

RAJENDRA MOHAN AGARWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, an 86‑year‑old senior citizen, filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking an expeditious disposal of Complaint Case No. 257 of 2020 (Smt. Shivali Agarwal v. Amodh Agarwal and others), which is pending before the Judicial Magistrate‑II, Agra under Section 12 of the …

JATINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant Jatin, owner of a hotel in Meerut, was implicated in Crime No. 119 of 2026 under sections 137(2), 61(2), 65(1) of the BNS and sections 16, 17, 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for allegedly failing to take the victim’s identification while taking that of a co‑accused. The prosecution …

SURAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Suraj Singh, who was arrested in connection with a case involving multiple offences under the BNS and Section 66D of the IT Act. The applicant claimed innocence and …

KALLU @ SAURAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Kallu @ Saurav filed a bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15534 of 2026, seeking release in a case (Crime No. 90 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 109(1), 191(2), 190 of the IPC and Section 117(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant contended that he was …

AMIT KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant, Amit Kumar Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of a pending criminal complaint (Case No. 89 of 2022) filed under Section 392 IPC. The applicant argued that the case had been pending for an unduly long period …

NARESH BABU AND 63 ANOTHERversusASHISH KUMAR PANDEY

The applicant, Naresh Babu and others, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act seeking to punish the opposite party for willful disobedience of a judgment dated 12 January 2026 in Writ Petition No. 3597 of 2022. The court noted that the order had been served on …

NEGI KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Negi Khan, who was named in an FIR but not mentioned in the victims' statements under Section 183. The applicant claimed false implication and pointed out that the co-accused, Lakhan, had already been granted bail. The State opposed bail but …

M/S PARIDHI AUTO INDUSTRYversusMS U.S. INDUSTRIES

The petitioners, M/s Paridhi Auto Industry, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional District & Sessions Judge (Special Judge, Anti‑Corruption, Meerut) to dispose of SCC Suit No. 16 of 2024 against Ms U.S. Industries within a reasonable time. The petition highlighted …

SIMRAN SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Simran Sharma and another, filed a writ petition alleging that their marriage was recognized by their parents and that there was no danger to their lives. Their counsel submitted that the petition was not being pressed and requested its dismissal. The respondents, the State of U.P. …

MURSALINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Mursalin, mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, sought bail in a dowry‑death case where she was charged under IPC sections 85, 80(2), 351(3) and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She claimed that the deceased was strangled by her husband and that she was in her Iddat period, …

IRFAN AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Irfan Ahmad, filed a writ petition seeking a compassionate appointment after his father's death in harness in 2020, submitting a belated representation dated 19‑02‑2024. The High Court, without delving into the merits, disposed of the petition, directing that the claim for …

SMT. MEERA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Meera Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to decide Execution Case No. 46 of 2025, which had been pending since 2025 despite several dates being fixed. The petitioner argued that the delay was unjustified and requested an expeditious …

VIDYADHAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Uttar Pradesh Board of Revenue, Lucknow, to decide Revision No. 2354 of 2015, which had been pending since 2015 with repeated adjournments. The petitioners argued that the adjournments were not justified under Paragraph 458(2) of the …

SHAILENDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shailendra Yadav, who was charged under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955, Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and Section 109(1) of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that …

SANDEEP KUMAR @ SANDHAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Sandeep Kumar, who was alleged to have participated in indiscriminate firing during a panchayat election rivalry. The applicant claimed false implication, no injury, and lack of criminal …

RAJPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajpal Singh filed a writ petition challenging a prior judgment of this Court in Radheshyam Shukla v. State of U.P. concerning the period of communication prescribed therein. The petitioner sought relief on the ground that the earlier decision was erroneous. The Court examined the prayer …

VIRENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Virendra Kumar, who was accused under IPC sections 69, 352 and 351(3) in a case involving a major‑age female victim. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 …

DULIRAMversusDIRECTOR K.P. SINGH

The petitioner Duliram filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), District Rampur to decide Suit No. 281 of 2022 (Duliram vs Director K.P. Singh) within a stipulated time. The petition alleged that the suit was pending and required expeditious …

DAYA SHANKERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

In PIL No.1206 of 2026, petitioner Daya Shanker sought a court direction to the Tehsildar of Sadar, Basti to decide a pending revenue case (No.6273 of 2025) concerning encroachment on a public utility plot under Section 67(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the case had …

DULARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dulari, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Finance and Accounts Officer (respondent No.3) to decide the gratuity claim of her late husband as per a Government order dated 24-12-2025. The petitioner alleged that despite multiple representations, no action was taken. The …

HIMANSHU @ PIYUSH @ BHANJA @ KATTAR BANIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for an accused in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely …

VINOD SINGH @ VINOD KUMAR SINGH AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners sought interference with a First Information Report (FIR) that alleged they obstructed a Sub‑Divisional Magistrate and government officials during a public road construction, using criminal force and brickbatting police and revenue officers. The FIR described a pandemonium that …

SANTRAMversusANIL GAUTAM AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner Santram filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate, Dumariyaganj, to decide the pending Original Suit No. 391 of 2024 against Anil Gautam and others within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the suit was languishing …

ARVIND PASWAN @ TENIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arvind Paswan, who was charged under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The applicant argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no cow was …

PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Prakash, who was arrested in a 2018 case under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged involvement in a gunshot injury. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the co-accused Kanhaiya was responsible for the injury, …

RAVI CHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ravi Chandra, filed a writ petition seeking an interim mandamus directing the State respondents to demolish an alleged illegal encroachment of about 7 Bigha 6 Biswa by respondent no.6, invoking Sections 67(2) and 67(6) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The State's standing …

ANKUR BANERJEEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ankur Banerjee, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 871/2022) arising from allegations under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 406 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act, on the ground that the …

ABDUL RAHMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Abdul Rahman, who was arrested in connection with offences under multiple sections of the same Act and the Copyright Act. The applicant contended that he …

SMT CHANDRAWATIversusGOPAL AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt Chandrawati filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division Court No.2, Bareilly, to decide her original suit (No. 180 of 2014) against Gopal and five others within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the suit was …

KARMVEER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Karmveer Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of a pending complaint (Case No. 16186 of 2023) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint, titled Karmveer Vs. Sanjay, had been pending …

RAJARSHI DUBEY AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 496 of 2022) arising from FIR No. 0572 of 2020 that alleged offences under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The dispute was matrimonial in …

LILAVATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant, Lilavati, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of a pending criminal case (Case No. 23 of 2016) involving offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The trial court had delayed the proceedings for a long …

SUDHIR KUMAR TIWARI AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 16‑04‑2026 that demanded a reply within three days for the cancellation of a lease agreement intended to last for thirty years. They contended that no legal provision permits such a short notice period for terminating a long‑term lease …

SMT SANJU NISHADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Smt. Sanju Nishad, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of a pending criminal case (Case No. 732 of 2019) involving offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The trial …

SMT IKARA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The petitioners, Smt. Ikara and another, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 27/2026) alleging offences under IPC sections 111(2)(B), 308(5), 115(2), 351(3) and 317(2). They claimed innocence, asserted …

ALAUDDINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Alauddin, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 103 of 2026 involving alleged theft of articles, a sharp‑edged weapon and a screwdriver, and charges under …

SATENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Satendra Singh, the husband, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an ex parte maintenance order and a recovery suit under Section 147 BNSS that had been passed in his absence. He contended that the order was issued without notice, that his wife had deserted him, and …

DEEP SACHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Deep Sachan challenged a punishment order dated 17‑01‑2026 that withheld two annual salary increments. The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief from the disciplinary action. Respondents, including the State of U.P. and the Power Corporation, argued …

SANGITA KUMARI GOND AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioners' counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and not press it further. The court considered the request for withdrawal. It dismissed the writ petition on the ground that it was not …

KOKAN YADAV @ INDAJEET YADAV AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 181 of 2026) arising from Crime No. 50 of 2025, which involved charges under various sections of the BNSS and the POCSO Act. The application was presented before the Hon'ble …

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Rakesh Kumar Pandey and another filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 22‑04‑2026 and a revenue inspector's report dated 18‑03‑2026. The respondents, the State of U.P. and others, contested the petition, and the standing counsel raised a preliminary …

PRAGYA PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Pragya Pandey filed a writ petition seeking her reinstatement, alleging that the decision on her claim has been pending for more than six years with no order either in her favour or against. The petitioners were represented by Ashutosh Srivastava and Devansh Misra, while the State of U.P. and other …

DEENA NATHversusKRIPA SHANKAR AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Deena Nath, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the IInd Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) at Kashya, Kushi Nagar to decide Suit No. 1231 of 2009 (Jagannath et al. v. Kripa Shankar et al.) within a stipulated period. The petition solely asked for an expeditious …

SMT PREM LATA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The applicant, Smt Prem Lata Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of Criminal Case No. 7743 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The case …

MAHENDRA KUMAR CHAUDHARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 54 OTHERS

Petitioners Mahendra Kumar Chaudhari and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking certiorari to quash orders dated 10‑04‑2026 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Phoolpur, Prayagraj. The State of U.P. and other respondents opposed the petition. The learned Standing Counsel for …

SOMAI RAMversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Somai Ram, challenged an order dated 10 April 2026 by the District Panchayat Raj Officer, Basti, which suspended him and transferred him from one revenue village to another within the same district. He had filed a representation against the transfer with the District Magistrate and …

ROHIT PALversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rohit Pal, applied for a passport which the Regional Passport Officer in Lucknow refused to issue on the ground of a pending criminal case against him. He filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the officer to issue the passport. The Court examined prior authority, noting …

BABLU SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Bablu Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashment of FIR No. 0015 of 2026 dated 26-04-2026, which alleged rape, assault, and fraudulent withdrawal of Rs.2,500 from the victim's fiancé's bank account. The FIR listed offences under Sections …

RAJESH AND 3 OTHERSversusJANKU AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge, Court No. 14 Varanasi, to finally decide a pending civil revision (Civil Revision No. 29 of 2025) within a stipulated period. The petition sought an expeditious disposal of that revision. …

SMT. SHARDA DEVIversusSMT. SUNITA DEVI AND 4 OTHERS

Smt. Sharda Devi filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Ballia to decide an injunction application (6C2) in Original Suit No. 296/2025 against Smt. Sunita Devi and others. The petitioner requested that the lower court decide the matter …

MANOJ KUMARversusMR AZIZ AHMAD

Manoj Kumar filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that Mr. Aziz Ahmad willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 08‑12‑2025 in Special Appeal No. 1187 of 2025. The order was served on the opposite party on 17‑12‑2025, but the court found that it …

SATISH SAINI @ CHOTU @ VIRATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Satish Saini, accused under Sections 137(2) and 64 of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a minor girl. The prosecution alleged the girl was a minor of about 16 years based on medical ossification reports, …

NARESH BAL BHATNAGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Naresh Bal Bhatnagar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, the Revenue Officer, to decide a pending case (Case No. 10507 of 2021) filed under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being …

JAVED ALAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Javed Alam filed a writ petition seeking the quashal of a notice dated 23‑04‑2026 and a mandamus directing the respondents to refrain from any coercive or demolition action concerning his house at Chowk, Varanasi. The respondents produced an instruction dated 30‑04‑2026 and an inspection …

SURENDRA KUMAR VERMA @ SURENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Surendra Kumar Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Special Judge (N.D.P.S. Act) in Varanasi. He contended that he was already on bail when the NBW was issued and that the court had not served any …

ANSHUL ALIAS KAVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Anshul Alias Kavi, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS (2023) seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 17192/9 of 2025) arising from a charge under Sections 3, 5 and 25 of the Arms Act in Muzaffarnagar. The application was intended to halt the case pending …

SMT JIYA VERMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel later informed the court that they did not wish to pursue the petition and requested its dismissal. The court accepted this request and dismissed the writ petition on the ground that it was not pressed, while granting the …

ABHINAV ALIAS MONU CHAURASIAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Abhinav alias Monu Chaurasia, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The …

SADHANA PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sadhana Pandey, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court in Gorakhpur to decide her pending petition (Case No. 1017 of 2022) under Section 125 CrPC within a reasonable time. The …

PANKAJ KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar Gupta, a contractual conductor with the Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTS), filed a writ petition seeking mandamus orders directing the corporation to consider his representations dated 11‑12‑2024 and 25‑03‑2025, provide financial assistance for …

KAJAL DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners Kajal Devi and another filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel informed the court that a First Information Report (FIR) had already been lodged in the matter. The court held that the filing of …

RAKESH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The revisionist Rakesh Yadav filed a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court challenging the District Magistrate, Chandauli's order dated 05.02.2026 that rejected the release of a vehicle seized under the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 (sections 3, 5A, 5B, 8). The …

SMT KAUSHALYA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Smt Kaushalya Devi, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of a pending criminal trial (Case No. 176 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 IPC. The learned counsel argued that the trial …

SMT. REENA YADAVversusMUKESH AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Reena Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (SD) Budaun to decide an interim injunction application pending in Original Suit No. 102/26 within a specified period and to maintain status quo over the disputed property until final …

SONEYA UPADHYAYA @ SONEYA SHARMAversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Soneya Upadhyaya, requested a postponement of the Physical Efficiency Test (PET) for a Sub‑Inspector post because she was experiencing severe menstrual cramps, but the nodal officer refused. Consequently, she failed the PET and sought a compassionate re‑appointment under the …

MOHD ARIFversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mohd Arif, who was arrested in a narcotics case under Sections 8 and 18 of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 1.023 kg of opium, a quantity below the commercial …

M/S NEW CALCUTTA MACHINERY STORESversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, M/S New Calcutta Machinery Stores, had its GST registration cancelled on 16‑12‑2023. Subsequent show‑cause notices dated 25‑12‑2023 and 31‑05‑2024 were issued electronically via the Common Portal, despite the cancellation. The court held that under Section 169(1)(a)(b) of the Uttar …

SACHIN KUMARversusDR. RAJESH KUMAR, DISTRICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER

Sachin Kumar filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court against Dr. Rajesh Kumar, the District Basic Education Officer. The applicant alleged that the opposite party had failed to comply with an order of the writ court. Counsel for the applicant, Sanjeev Kumar Yadav, informed the …

HARSHIT VARSHNEY HINDUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Harshit Varshney, who was in custody since March 13, 2026 for offences including sections 191(2), 191(3), 125, 109(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the BNS, the …

SMT SHALINI CHATURVEDIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt Shalini Chaturvedi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to pay her a family pension as the widow of a deceased Class IV employee. She alleged that despite repeated representations, the pension had not been granted. …

OM PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Om Prakash, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 26‑10‑2023 passed by respondent No.3 under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The State’s standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner had an alternative remedy – an appeal under …

BHRIGUNATH YADAVversusSHRI RAVINDRA KUMAR AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's judgment dated 25‑11‑2025, as modified on 11‑02‑2026 in PIL No. 2971 of 2025. The order was served on the opposite party on 20‑02‑2026, but …

SURYANATH SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusDINESH SINGH

The applicants filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 12‑Nov‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 37872 of 2025. The order was served on 16‑Dec‑2025, but the opposite party had not complied. …

PADMENDRA SINGHversusSMT SANGEETA GAUTAM

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 31‑10‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 37484 of 2025. The order was served on 20‑11‑2025, but the opposite party allegedly failed to …

SATYAM GIRI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a group of locals, were named in an FIR after a Scorpio car hit a bicycle ridden by a 15‑year‑old boy and a parked car. In protest, the petitioners organized a blockade of the Mau‑Azamgarh Highway from 3:30 pm to 6:30 pm, causing traffic jams and preventing ambulances from reaching …

MO ZAKARIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mo Zakariya, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 110 of the IPC arising from a property dispute and alleged assault. The applicant argued that he had not been arrested, had no …

IMRAN ALIversusGRAM PRADHAN GRAM PANCHAYAT CHANDPUR AUDHERA, AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Imran Ali filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Khaga, Fatehpur to decide his application for a temporary injunction in Original Suit No. 240 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the suit required expeditious disposal. The Court …

CHANDAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chandan Singh, who is charged under multiple sections of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act in Crime No. 17 of 2026. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that no specific role or weapon was linked to him, and …

M/S CALSTAR STEEL LIMITEDversusNORTH EASTERN RAILWAY

Calstar Steel Ltd filed an arbitration application under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against North Eastern Railway. The court examined the consent of former High Court Judge Justice Bharati Sapru to act as arbitrator under Section 11(8) of the Act. Finding the consent …

RAJESH KUMAR TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, owner of 0.018 hectare of plot No. 470 in Bhadohi district, filed a petition under Article 226 seeking a writ of mandamus to restrain the Public Works Department (PWD) from interfering with his possession. The State had already compensated the petitioner for a larger portion (0.071 …

SUNDAR AL DHURIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 1814 of 2024) arising from offences under IPC Section 354 and Sections 7/8 of the POCSO Act. The court noted that the applicant had earlier …

NIDHI RAWAT AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The applicants, Nidhi Rawat and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking the quashing of a chargesheet dated 25‑11‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 28‑02‑2025 in a case (Crime No. 502 of 2024) involving offences under IPC §§ 323, 504, 506, 376 and POCSO §§ 3, 4. The …

ROHIT SHARMA (MINOR) AND ANOTHERversusState of U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, represented by a minor Rohit Sharma, filed a habeas corpus petition seeking custody of the minor from the State of U.P. and other respondents. The respondents argued that the minor was not in illegal custody, noting that an earlier habeas corpus petition (No. 666 of 2022, Smt. …

RAJ BAHADUR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Raj Bahadur Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS to quash the summons and criminal complaint (Case No. 758 of 2021) filed by his daughter‑in‑law, Shradha, under Sections 498A, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The dispute between the applicant’s …

RAJAT AND 3 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 29 February 2022 and a charge‑sheet (No. 19 of 2021) filed under Sections 498A, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in a criminal …

MANTOSH RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Mantosh Ram, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code seeking relief concerning a birth certificate issued on 21‑11‑2023. The State’s Additional Government Advocate was directed to verify the authenticity of the certificate. The AGA’s compliance report concluded …

RAJENDRA KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusMORADABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Rajendra Kumar and three others, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution against the Moradabad Development Authority and two other respondents. The petition sought relief from the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners, …

MOHD. ASAD ALIAS ASAADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mohd. Asad, who was in custody for alleged offences under multiple IPC sections and the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted the long …

SMT. SUBHADRA DEVI @ SAHODHRA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Subhadra Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Aligarh to consider and decide a representation she had submitted on 20 June 2024, which remained pending. The petitioner alleged undue delay and requested the court to compel the …

HARSHITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Harshit, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 259 of 2025 under Sections 7 and 13 of the U.P. Public Examination Act. The applicant claimed he was …

PANNALAL AND 4 OTHERSversusSHIV KISHORE AND 3 OTHERS

The appellants appealed against the Tribunal’s award dated 28 May 2024 which dismissed their claim for compensation arising from a motor‑vehicle accident that caused the death of Subhash Chandra Vimal. The dispute centred on the correct registration number of the dumper involved – the FIR recorded …

KUMARI NEHA PALversusDR. RAMESH CHANDRA, C.M.O.

The petitioner, Kumari Neha Pal, an adopted daughter of a deceased Class IV employee, sought family pension and related benefits. The High Court had earlier directed her to file a fresh representation before the Chief Medical Officer within three weeks. A compliance affidavit filed later indicated …

KM. BEENUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered an intra‑court appeal filed 58 days after the original judgment, which dismissed a writ petition seeking a compassionate appointment on the ground of delay. The court condoned the 58‑day filing delay but held that the substantive appeal lacked merit. It observed …

BHAGWAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The revisionist sought to set aside a Session Judge's order rejecting an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to summon Kallan (opposite party no.2) in a murder trial. The FIR named Ravindra as the principal accused and mentioned a belief that Kallan also participated. Witness statements, including …

ANIL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Anil Singh, who was arrested in a NDPS case for allegedly possessing 40 g of Alprazolam. The applicant claimed false implication and argued that the mandatory …

FAHAD MUSTAFAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Fahad Mustafa, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant’s counsel, Mohd. Naushad Ahmad Khan, was not present on the scheduled date of 20‑04‑2026, nor on the subsequent date. The State’s counsel, G.A., appeared before the …

VIJAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Vijay Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 29‑03‑2024 and a cognizance order dated 13‑09‑2024 in a criminal case (Case No. 16384 of 2024) involving offences under various IPC sections. He contended that the investigation …

SUNIL KUMAR @ BABLOOversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.16686 of 2024) arising from an FIR alleging that he procured a forged character certificate while a criminal case was pending against him. The FIR led to a charge‑sheet under Sections 419 …

STATE OF UP AND ANOTHERversusADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER

The State of Uttar Pradesh and another filed a writ petition challenging the non‑constitution of the GST Appellate Tribunal under section 112 of the GST Act, which prevented them from preferring an appeal against orders under sections 107 and 108. The Court noted that the Central Government had …

VINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Vinod Kumar appealed to the Allahabad High Court against a summoning order of a Special Judge who had taken cognizance only of offences under Sections 504 and 506 of the IPC and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, despite the FIR also alleging offences under Sections 420 …

NITIN YADAV @ KALUWAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Nitin Yadav, who is charged under IPC Sections 307 and 504 and the Arms Act (Sections 4 and 25). The applicant had been in custody for four years and his earlier bail plea …

OM SHARANversusState of U.P. AND 2 Others

Om Saran filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Mainpuri who had dismissed his protest petition against a chargesheet in State v. Mohit under IPC sections 279 and 304‑A. The revisionist argued that the magistrate failed to appreciate the …

PRASHANT KUMAR BINDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioner Prashant Kumar Bind filed a public interest litigation seeking execution of a 4 November 2023 order directing removal of encroachment from a plot in Jaunpur under Section 67(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The High Court noted that the order had not been implemented and issued notices …

SOMIL SHAHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Somil Shah filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, U.P. …

PRAMOD GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Pramod Goswami, who is accused under Sections 8, 20, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 191.6 kg of ganja recovered from a truck where he was seated …

SHIVAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shivam was arrested in connection with a criminal case (Crime No.188 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 109, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, where the injured’s statement assigned him the role of ‘catching hold’ while the actual assault was attributed to co‑accused brothers Komal and …

LALMUNI DEVIversusSHAILENDRA SINGH, TEHSILDAR

The applicant, Lalmuni Devi, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Tehsildar Shailendra Singh, had failed to comply with a writ dated 13 March 2024 directing the conclusion of proceedings under Section 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The opposite party submitted …

VISHWANATH SINGH @ BHOLAversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Vishwanath Singh @ Bhola, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant, Krishna Kant Tiwari, informed the court of his intention to withdraw the application. No opposition was raised by the …