Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 9401–9600
The applicant, Salman Qadir, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summons dated 02‑04‑2021 and the entire criminal proceeding (Complaint No.1408 of 2020) against him under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint alleged that …
The applicant, Nakul, was arrested in connection with a murder despite not being named in the FIR, based on his alleged presence near the deceased's body and a message sent from his sister's phone. The co‑accused, Aniket, confessed to the strangulation, while other co‑accused have already been …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 249 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 74, 351(3) of the BNSS and Sections 7 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash an order dated 27‑08‑2025 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut, which had rejected a request to release a vehicle. The application was presented before Hon'ble Justice …
The applicant, Hasnavi, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 359 of 2024) alleging false implication. The prosecution’s key witnesses, the informant and the injured party, turned hostile and denied the applicant’s involvement, stating the injury was caused by an unknown person. The State …
The applicant, Piyush Trivedi, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 6421 of 2020) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etawah, which involved offences under IPC Sections 153A and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of an accused charged with offences under IPC Sections 376(3), 504, 506 and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of an 11‑year‑old deaf‑and‑dumb girl. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vishal, who has been in custody since 24 April 2025 in Crime No. 50 of 2025 under IPC Sections 109(1), 352 and 351(3). The applicant claimed false implication and argued that the key prosecution witnesses – the informant (PW1) and the injured …
The applicant, Dalel Singh, was arrested on 26 May 2025 in connection with Crime No. 154 of 2025 under Section 140(4) of the B.N.S. and has been in custody since then. He claimed false implication, noting that the victim (PW‑3) and two key witnesses (PW‑1 and PW‑2) had turned hostile during trial. …
The revisionists, Smt. Priti and three others, filed a criminal revision challenging the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate’s order rejecting their application under Section 198 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) to drop the proceedings. They argued that a written certificate from the …
The petitioners challenged two orders: one by the Additional Sessions Judge dismissing a criminal revision, and another by the Civil Judge allowing the sister of a deceased complainant to continue proceedings under Section 506 IPC. The petitioner argued that the sister, being only a sibling and not …
Virendra Kumar Yadav filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside a magistrate's order rejecting his application under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, and a subsequent revision order, both of which dismissed his claim that the respondent habitually issued dishonoured …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 10665 of 2024) arising from alleged offences under sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. They argued that a compromise dated 27‑02‑2026 had been …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sujit Kumar Srivastava, who was arrested under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 of the IPC for alleged misappropriation and forgery of Rs.5 lakh. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the dispute was a business matter, …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to challenge an order dated 21‑08‑2024 of the Special Judge (Anti‑Corruption), Meerut, which had taken cognizance of an offence. The High Court heard numerous adjournments and complied with a direction of the …
The applicant, Smt Neetu Devi, had filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 808 of 2024 in the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit to another court. Subsequent developments led the applicant to decide not to pursue the transfer and she moved the court to dismiss the application as …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal case No. 15/IX/2025, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 506 of the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, arising from a matrimonial dispute. The parties had entered into a voluntary compromise …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.115 of 2005, Crime No.155 of 2024) that were pending under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the BNSS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant and the victim had married on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 570 of 2025) arising from a matrimonial dispute, on the ground that the parties had entered into a genuine settlement dated 29‑08‑2025, which was verified by the lower court. The …
Ashok Kumar, a Junior Engineer with the PWD, was arrested on allegations of demanding Rs.50,000 for the clearance of bills, under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (amended 2018). He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record, and had been in custody since 12 …
The petitioners Rajveer and four others filed an appeal under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. No private respondent appeared, and only counsel for the petitioners and the State respondent were present. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the appeal be dismissed as withdrawn. The …
Vikram Bansfor filed a criminal revision challenging a Special Judge's order that dismissed his complaint under section 203 of the Cr.P.C. He alleged the trial court failed to consider his complaint version, statements recorded under sections 200 and 202, and did not give him an opportunity to …
The appellant, Rambharosh, filed a possession suit in 2015 and the trial court, relying on an Amin's report, valued the property at Rs. 74,53,349 based on market rates of 2025. The appellant contended that valuation should have been based on the circle rate fixed by the District Magistrate in 2015, …
The applicant Dinesh Kumar sought quashing of the pending Sessions case No. 778 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376 and 506 IPC, on the ground that he and the victim had entered into a compromise on 29‑08‑2025, later verified by the trial court. The victim, who was the key prosecution …
An appeal (Criminal Appeal No. 10124 of 2025) was filed by Akash @ Punita and another against the State of U.P. The appellant's counsel, Sandeep Pandey, informed the court that the appellant no longer wished to pursue the criminal appeal. Counsel for the respondent and the Additional Government …
The appellants, Ajay @ Allu and another, filed Criminal Appeal No. 9676 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court challenging a conviction by the State of U.P. During the hearing, counsel for the appellants informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the appeal. Counsel for the respondent …
An appeal was filed before the Allahabad High Court challenging a criminal conviction. The appellant's counsel informed the court that the appellant no longer wished to pursue the appeal. The respondent's counsel and the Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to this request. The court …
Mohammad Mehdi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 25592 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and seven others. The petitioner's counsel, Nayab Ahmad Khan, was not present before the Court. No interim order had been passed in the proceedings. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Charge Sheet No.324 of 2017 and the related proceedings arising from offences under Sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had entered into a compromise on 6 June 2025, …
The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a murder‑related case (Crime No. 191 of 2025) where a charge‑sheet had already been filed. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the FIR initially listed Sections 115(2), 140(1), 109 B.N.S. and later added …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the cognizance order, summons and notice of charge in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High Court …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS against the State of U.P. and another party. Counsel for the applicants, Rahul Kumar Tyagi, moved before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that the application be withdrawn. The court considered whether a pending application …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash charge sheet No.66/2024 and related proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the …
The petitioner Satyendra Kumar filed an Article 227 petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to set aside an order dated 21 March 2025 of the Additional Sessions Judge and a subsequent order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 20 November 2023, which had dismissed his protest petition in a …
The petitioner, Rekha Devi, filed a criminal complaint alleging dowry demand and harassment by her husband’s relatives and later moved an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to summon additional accused, which the trial court dismissed without reasons. The petitioner appealed the dismissal through …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking an order directing the State and other respondents to remove private encroachments on two land plots in Samodhpur village, Jaunpur. The Court noted that the petitioner has a specific remedy under Sections 26 and 67 of the Uttar Pradesh …
The applicants Abdul Sattar and four others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 102078 of 2025) arising from Crime No. 19 of 2025 and a summoning order dated 18.08.2025. They contended that the proceedings were abusive of process …
The petitioner, Sooraj Singh, executed a lease deed with the respondent on 24-10-2017, stipulating a rent of Rs.5,000 per month, which the respondent allegedly withheld and failed to vacate the premises. The petitioner filed a criminal complaint (No.1271/2024) alleging fraud and non‑payment of rent, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 12‑05‑2023 and the summons dated 14‑08‑2024 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …
The applicant, Rashid Akhtar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 02‑Nov‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 09‑Jul‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 32256 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 79B of the BNSS and Section …
The applicant, Dvarika Jaiswal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Case No. 2619 of 2017, which were instituted under Section 461 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 of the Indian Telegraph Act. The …
The petitioner, Radheyshyam, was charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for a bounced cheque. He applied to the trial court for the production of a loan agreement, claiming the cheque was given as security and not to discharge a debt. Both the trial court and the revisional …
The petitioner, Ramvriksha Nishad, filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to respondent No.3 to decide a representation dated 20 August 2025, aiming to remove an alleged illegal encroachment by private respondent No.6 on a 0.016 hectare plot recorded as Banjar in Jaunpur …
Geeta Devi appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking to quash the Special Judge’s order that dismissed her complaint under Section 203 Cr.P.C. The trial court had held that the dispute over land was …
The petitioner, Shabana Khan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against her. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet in the …
The petitioners challenged the attachment of their land ordered by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) under Section 146(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the subsequent dismissal of their criminal revision by the Additional District and Session Judge. They filed a petition under Article 227 of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 4 July 2024 and the entire proceeding in a case filed under Sections 323 and 504 IPC. They alleged false implication, claiming that the charge sheet was filed for non‑cognizable offences …
The High Court, while disposing of Writ‑C No. 12392 of 2025 on 23 April 2025, directed the opposite party to decide the applicant's representation if a representation was filed. The opposite party filed an affidavit on 12 February 2026 stating that it had complied with the order and had decided the …
Raju Prajapati filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the State of U.P. and other respondents to act against alleged illegal constructions on Plot Nos. 687 and 692 in Village Deepapur, Jaunpur. The petitioner asked the court to compel respondents 2 and 3 to initiate action against …
The appellants, Prem Chandra Vishwakarma and five others, filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, counsel for the appellants, Mr. Virendra Kumar Maurya, expressed that the appellants no longer wished to pursue the appeal and requested its dismissal as not …
The Allahabad High Court heard an application under Section 528 of the BNSS filed by Nagender @ Narendra Kumar and 12 others seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 66019 of 2025) arising from offences under various IPC sections. During the hearing the applicants’ counsel …
The petitioner Rita Devi filed a petition under Article 227 challenging two orders: the trial court’s dismissal of her complaint under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) and the revisional court’s upholding of that dismissal. The dispute arose from a land conflict settled by a …
The petitioner, Roop Singh, filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachment on plot No. 795Gha in Village Baraoli, Agra. The court noted an instruction dated 24‑01‑2026 from the Deputy District Magistrate ordering proceedings under Section 67(1) of the …
The petitioner, Nasim Ahmad, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the District Magistrate (respondent No.2) to correct erroneous entries for Plot No. 1000, which was mistakenly recorded as a river in CH Form 41 and later allotted as private land in CH Form 45. The petitioner …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 780 of 2025) arising from allegations under IPC sections 498A and 323 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The dispute stemmed from a matrimonial conflict that had been referred to the Court's …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the charge sheet and related proceedings in a criminal case. During the hearing, the applicants indicated they would withdraw all other prayers, surrender before the lower court …
The appellants filed an appeal under Section 14A‑1 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to quash a summoning order dated 08‑08‑2024 issued by the Special Judge in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections …
The applicant, Ajaruddin @ Salman Audi, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings arising from a 2024 altercation in Meerut, alleging false implication and lack of any victim statement. The charge‑sheet, filed by the police, named eight …
The petitioners filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachment on plot No. 525 (0.0240 hectare) in Village Bhadesar, Deoria. The court noted that the Tehsildar had already issued an instruction dated 16‑12‑2025 and had initiated proceedings under Section …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS. The High Court dismissed the application. The judgment refers the parties to an earlier order dated in Application u/s 528 BNSS No. 47865 of 2025 (Akhilesh vs. State of U.P. and another).
The applicant, Daya Nand Chand, filed a civil contempt application against Ram Jiyawan Maurya, a District Basic Education Officer, for allegedly failing to comply with a writ court order directing payment of a sum with interest. The writ court had ordered the officer to pay a principal amount, which …
The petitioner, Mata Prasad, filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction for respondents 2, 3 and 4 to remove an alleged illegal encroachment by respondents 6 to 8 on Plot No. 90 in Village Kasturipur, Prayagraj. The petition relied on revenue records that still listed Plot No. 90 …
The applicants, Digvijay Singh and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 25‑12‑2023 and the cognizance order dated 10‑10‑2024 in a case arising from FIR No. 74 of 2023 alleging offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 501, 294 and 120B …
The applicants filed applications under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 29‑06‑2025, the summoning order dated 06‑08‑2025, and the entire criminal proceeding (Criminal Case No. 117 of 2025) relating to alleged offences including rape. The applicants contended that the FIR did …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 07‑09‑2021 in a criminal case (Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act) pending before the Judicial Magistrate in …
The petitioners, recorded tenure‑holders of plots 270, 271 and 272 in Rasulpur Mawaiya, Prayagraj, applied to the Settlement Officer under Section 5(1)(c) of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 for permission to construct a house. The officer rejected the application, stating that …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the proceedings of Special Case No. 3401 of 2025, which arose from a criminal complaint involving offences under the BNSS, the POCSO Act and the Juvenile Justice Act. After hearing, the …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachment by private respondents on a pond plot (0.0770 hectare) in Village Bagai Mutalka Banhara, Azamgarh. The court noted an instruction dated 02.01.2026 from the Tehsildar, Sagadi, indicating that …
Megh Singh filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the Tehsildar of Chandausi, Sambhal, to enforce an eviction order dated 13‑07‑2024 issued under Section 67(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner claimed that he had sent an application under Para 460(1) of the U.P. …
Mintu alias Shiva was arrested in connection with an assault that caused injury to the victim's right hand, under Sections 115(2), 351(2), 118(1) and 118(2) of the B.N.S. 2023. The FIR was lodged four days after the incident, and both the accused and the victim were found to be intoxicated at the …
The petitioners filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order directing respondents to remove alleged illegal encroachments on several plots recorded as a graveyard, Kabristan, and Hajeera in Village Mujhera, Muzaffarnagar. The court examined instructions from the Deputy District …
The petitioner, Hanuman, filed a public interest litigation challenging the non‑compliance with an order dated 29‑Nov‑2024 issued under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 concerning encroachment on Plot No. 156 in Village Dipaipur, Jaunpur. The Court directed the State’s standing counsel to …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 1335 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 351(3) and 324(4) of the BNSS. The parties had reached a compromise on 12 November 2025, and the co‑accused (opposite …
The applicant, Sukhram Singh, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 1006 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the transfer application for want of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikram Singh Yadav, who was charged under several IPC sections for allegedly fraudulently executing a sale deed of a disputed property. The applicant argued that the dispute was essentially civil, citing a pending injunction suit and a prior …
The High Court considered a bail application filed on behalf of Sohil, who is charged in Crime No. 27 of 2025 under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Information Technology Act. The applicant argued that he is not named in the FIR, has no prior convictions, and has been in custody …
Petitioner Vinod Kumar filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to reopen and restore an irrigation drain in Plot No.770, Mathura. The drain had been abolished by a revision order dated 2 September 2024, and a subsequent …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 18‑01‑2025 and the summons issued in Crime No. 189 of 2024, alleging that the FIR was filed with an unexplained three‑day delay and that there was no medical evidence of injury. The State …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings arising from Charge Sheet No. 34 of 2016 (Sections 452, 323, 504, 506, 325 IPC) on the ground that they had reached an out‑of‑court settlement with the opposite party. The trial court …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking quash of criminal proceedings arising from a charge sheet dated 10 June 2022 for offences under Sections 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court compromise on 1 December 2025, and the …
The applicants, Satya Priya Gautam @ Anshu and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 2635 of 2018) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. They claimed that the dispute had been amicably settled by a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and the entire criminal proceeding (Criminal Case No. 143411 of 2022) on the ground that they had reached a compromise with the second opposite party. Both the State and the second opposite party …
The applicant Vijay Kumar was arrested for allegedly assaulting his wife and her sister, causing grievous injury to his wife's neck while in an inebriated state. The FIR alleges use of a sharp‑edged weapon, but the sister sustained no injury. The applicant has been in custody since 27 July 2025, has …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Afzal, who was arrested in a NDPS case (Sections 8 and 20) for alleged possession of 1.5 kg of charas. The applicant contended that the seizure violated Section 50 of …
Yellowbird Hotels And Resorts Pvt. Ltd. filed a petition under Article 227 seeking direction regarding the remaining properties of a judgment debtor. The petitioner alleged that the properties were within the jurisdiction of the District Judge, Gautam Buddha Nagar. The respondent submitted an …
Kapil Upadhyay filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 14‑07‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 17‑09‑2025 in a gang‑rape case (Case No. 19382 of 2025). The applicant argued that the FIR was false, the victim was in a consensual relationship, and …
Petitioners Yatendra Kumar Jaiswal and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents not to install an electricity transformer on the gate of their residence and to compel the Collector, Chandauli (respondent No. 2) to decide a …
The applicant, Akhtar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a remand order dated 22 August 2025. The State, through the Additional Government Advocate, raised a preliminary objection that the application had become infructuous because a charge …
The applicant, Yatendra alias Pichchu, was arrested along with five others in connection with the death of a three‑year‑old girl, alleged to have been thrown into a canal. During investigation, eye‑witness statements and CCTV footage indicated that the first informant, not the applicant, was …
The applicant filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash the summons dated 17‑09‑2024 and the entire proceedings in a Section 138 complaint (Om Prakash Dubey v. Shantanu) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra. The applicant argued that the dispute was …
The petitioner, Pradeep Kumar Shamra, filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order directing the removal of an alleged illegal encroachment by respondents 5‑8 on Plot No.75 (0.0310 hectare) recorded as Goole (Naali) in the revenue records of Village Dhilvari, Budaun. The High Court noted …
The petitioners, both adults, married each other under Hindu rites on 16-12-2025. Their families objected and the first petitioner's brother filed an FIR (Crime No. 248 of 2025) under Section 87 of the BNS alleging that the second petitioner had taken away the first petitioner by blandishment. The …
Smt. Rajani filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 3 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. The applicant failed to appear before the court and did not prosecute the application. The court observed that there was no appearance to press the application. Consequently, …
Amar Singh was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 544 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m) of the BNS Act and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated and that the victim, an 18‑year‑old, had stated in a Section 183 …
The applicant, Mohammed Shuaib, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 186 of 2025) involving alleged sexual assault, filed under IPC sections 64(1), 62, 324(5) and 310(2). The applicant argued that the FIR contained generic allegations and that CCTV footage did not conclusively identify him, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Avinash Sharma, who was in custody for offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 376(2) of the Indian Penal Code arising from an alleged false promise of marriage, subsequent marriage elsewhere, and threats to the victim. The prosecution alleged …
The petitioner, Shakir Anwar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition contained certain discrepancies, prompting the petitioner’s counsel to seek dismissal of the petition as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court examined the procedural defect and …
The High Court considered the bail application of Gulfam alias Chhanga, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.476 of 2025) alleging kidnapping and rape under Sections 87 and 64 of the Indian Penal Code. The victim’s statement under Section 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code claimed …
The applicant filed a Section 482 CrPC petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 3497 of 2021) arising from an FIR alleging rape (Sec. 376 IPC) and criminal intimidation (Sec. 506 IPC). The parties had entered into a written compromise, which was verified by the trial court, and the …
The appellant Bhola was convicted under Section 394 IPC for robbery and sentenced to five years' rigorous imprisonment. He appealed, contending that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was delayed, and that the witnesses were unreliable. The trial court had relied on the testimonies of the …
The criminal appeal No. 1747 of 1984 filed by Satish and Mahadev against the State of U.P. was pending before the Allahabad High Court. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar, reported on 22 April 2026 that appellant No.2, Mahadev, had died. The appeal had already been deemed abated with …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in …
Anil Kumar was charged with raping a mentally challenged girl on 30 September 2025. The prosecution alleged the assault, but there was no medical evidence and the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the CrPC indicated she had consented. The applicant pleaded innocence, argued the FIR was filed …
The petitioners, Megha Maurya and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a …
Ravi Kesarwani applied for bail in a rape case (Criminal No. 406 of 2025) alleging that the FIR was filed 11 days after the alleged offence and lacked a specific date and time. The prosecution contended that the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the CrPC were consistent with the FIR …
The applicants, the wife of a deceased person and her family members, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 306 and 506 of the IPC. They claimed innocence, stating that the deceased died from poison ingestion and that …
Amarjit Nishad filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed against the petitioner. The …
Tulsi Ram appealed a 1982 acquittal for offences under Sections 379 and 147 IPC, but the appeal remained pending for about four decades. The appellant died roughly twenty years ago and no legal heir applied for substitution or pursued the appeal. The court noted settled Supreme Court authority that …
Chunna Singh appealed against the trial court's acquittal of respondents 2 and 3 in a criminal matter. The appeal was listed but the appellant died on 16 March 2026. No application was filed by the legal heirs to continue the appeal. The High Court noted the appellant's death and the absence of any …
The appellants Munna, Radhir, Bhanwra and Bhura were convicted under Sections 307 and 34 of the IPC and sentenced to five years' rigorous imprisonment. While three appellants died during the pendency of the appeal, the case proceeded against Bhura, now about 95 years old, who does not contest the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted …
The appellants Dalchini and Munnilal filed a criminal appeal (No. 3242 of 1985) against a judgment of the Special Judge under the EC Act, Banda, concerning offences under Sections 323, 325 and 452 of the IPC. No counsel appeared for the appellants, while the State was represented by A.G.A. Ajay …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Junaid @ Bittu in a criminal case (Crime No. 193 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the …
Lakhan appealed against a conviction of the State in Criminal Appeal No. 2946 of 1988 before the Allahabad High Court. The appeal remained pending for many years. A letter dated 26 March 2026 from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hamirpur, informed the Court that the appellant, Lakhan, had died. No …
Monu Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 251 of 2025) alleging sexual assault of a mentally disabled 19‑year‑old victim under Sections 140(4) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, a delayed FIR, no prior criminal record, and that a compromise had been …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR registered against them. The Court examined a report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that the police had already filed a charge‑sheet in the matter. Since the charge‑sheet was on record, the …
The appellant Nitesh Sharma appealed against an order of the Special Judge under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act seeking bail. The FIR named only Babloo Sharma; the appellant was implicated solely through a confessional statement of the co‑accused and no …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, through the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 4 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of the …
The petitioners, Ayush Agarwal and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Director General of Police, submitted a report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been …
The petitioner, Smt. Beena, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from potential arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The court noted that mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue the petition. In view of the absence of …
Ramcharan filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 503 of 2007, which involved alleged violations of Sections 135 and 138 of the Electricity Act. The application was filed after a preliminary order for framing …
The petitioners Anuj Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet …
The appeal was filed by Raja Ram and another appellant, Sri Krishna, against the State of U.P. During the pendency of the appeal, the report of the CJM Shahjahanpur dated 20.03.2026 confirmed the death of appellant No.2, Sri Krishna. Earlier, the appeal of appellant No.1, Raja Ram, had already been …
Constable Ajay Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 670 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petitioners sought relief, but mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either …
The applicant, Yogendra Pratap alias Shekhar, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel appeared for the applicant on the revised call, while the State's brief holder was present. The court noted the applicant's failure to prosecute the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State submitted a report from the Director General of Police indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed. The Court observed that the petition …
The petitioners, Bansh Raj and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court …
Petitioners Kajal and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide protection for their life and liberty. The petition also requested liberty …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Tania Sanyal under CrPC Section 482, relating to an FIR that alleged offences under IPC Section 109 and Sections 12, 13(1)(b), 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The charge‑sheet had been filed …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 326 of 2024 arising from a POCSO and IPC offences case. The application challenged the cognizance and summoning order dated 28.10.2024 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a criminal trial (Sessions Trial No. 256 of 2022) on the ground that the parties had reached an amicable compromise. The applicants claimed innocence and alleged that the dispute had been settled, …
Pradeep Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State of Uttar Pradesh submitted a charge sheet, but the court was uncertain whether cognizance of the charge sheet had been taken by the trial court. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in …
Satish Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application under IPC s.109 and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, claiming that he was never arrested during the investigation and had fully cooperated with the CBI. A charge‑sheet was filed on 29‑Nov‑2024 and a summons issued on 25‑Aug‑2025. Relying on …
Petitioners Doodh Nath and others filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash three orders dated 4‑Jan‑1997, 30‑Jul‑1999 and 31‑Dec‑1999 passed by the Consolidation Officer, and mandamus directing respondents not to disturb their peaceful possession of land (Araji No. 299). The High Court …
The applicant Dharmendra filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, and also requested a stay of further …
The applicants Parmatma, Gunjeshwar and Krishna filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 12‑10‑2025, the cognizance order dated 27‑10‑2025, and the entire Special Session Trial No. 2258 of 2025 arising under various provisions of the SC/ST Act. The …
Virendra Bahadur Pal filed a criminal revision challenging a order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mau, which had treated his application under Section 173(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS) as a complaint and refused to order an investigation. Pal contended that the magistrate should have …
The applicant, Bhaskar Bhuvan, sought anticipatory bail under CrPC s.482 and the Prevention of Corruption Act after a charge‑sheet was filed in a corruption case. He had not been arrested during investigation and had cooperated with the CBI. Relying on Supreme Court judgments in Musheer Alam v. …
The applicants Ram Babu and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet issued by the Special Judge under the POCSO Act and related provisions of the SC/ST Act, and to stay the ongoing trial. The State filed a …
Petitioners Muskan and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared before the Court on the scheduled date or on the revised list, despite the presence of the Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. The Court noted the petitioners' non‑appearance and …
The applicant, Sachin Goswami, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case alleging offences under Sections 69, 352 and 351(3) of the IPC, claiming he was falsely implicated in a fabricated FIR concerning a purported marital relationship. The counsel argued that …
Petitioners Smt. Himanshi and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioners failed to appear for hearing on the scheduled date and also on the revised list dated 22 April 2026, while the Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State was present. The Court noted the …
The appellant Udham Singh filed a criminal appeal challenging his conviction. Counsel for the appellant and respondent presented their arguments before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The court examined the record to determine whether any legal or factual error warranted setting aside …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Dr. Anita Rathaur, who was charged with multiple offences including fraud, forgery, and medical negligence under various IPC sections and the Indian Medical Council Act. …
Raghunath Alias Batauli filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court challenging the decision of the lower court. The appeal was heard by a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Salil Kumar Rai and Hon'ble Justice Dr. Ajay Kumar-II. After consideration, the court found no merit in the …
The appellant Ranjeet filed Criminal Appeal No. 2195 of 2011 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the decision of the lower court. The Court considered the record and, referring to the order in the connected Criminal Appeal No. 1978 of 2011 (Krishan Pal @ Lala & Anr. v. State of U.P.), …
The Union of India and others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that had been granted. The dismissal was …
Karan Bharti was arrested in connection with a rape case involving a girl born on 02‑12‑2008, alleged to have been enticed under false pretences and assaulted, with charges under IPC sections 137(2), 64(2), 351(2), 123 BNS and sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, …
The petitioners, Seema Kushwaha and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. The State of Uttar Pradesh and another party were impleaded as respondents. Counsel for the petitioners, Ram Sheel Sharma, appeared before the …
The applicant, Naim Khan, a government servant, was summoned to trial in a case under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506 without the mandatory prior sanction required under Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking quash of the charge‑sheet and the …
The applicant, Pooja Chaddha, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court's intervention in a criminal proceeding. The application was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Deepak Verma. No counsel for the opposite party appeared, and the learned …
Pooja Chaddha filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The application was listed in Court No. 74 before Hon'ble Justice Deepak Verma. Counsel for the applicant were Ayyaz Khan and Vivek Kumar Shukla, while the opposite …
Pooja Chaddha filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The application was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. No substantive material or prosecution was presented before the court. The learned Additional Government Advocate was …
The applicant, Mohd Nadeem, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 562 of 2025) involving charges under several IPC sections, the POCSO Act, and other provisions. The victim, in a statement recorded under Section 183 of the Evidence Act, claimed she was in love with the applicant and alleged that …
A criminal revision (No. 806 of 2026) was filed by Satyapal Singh against the State of Uttar Pradesh and nine others. The revisionist's counsel, Vikas Singh, applied to withdraw the revision. The court considered the request and, noting the revisionist's intention to withdraw, dismissed the revision …
Satendra, a branch manager of a finance company, was charged under Section 316(5) of the B.N.S. for allegedly embezzling Rs. 8,30,682. He contended that the allegations were false and that he had himself filed an FIR against the company's collection agents for misappropriating funds, indicating his …
The applicant, Akhil Pal, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release while facing a charge under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. He claimed false implication, highlighted that he was …
The applicant, Arun Kumar Pandey, filed a civil contempt application (No. 648 of 2025) against Shrikrishn Upadhyay, alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. Counsel for the applicant, Adv. Paritosh Sukla (with Shashwat Shukla), submitted that the writ Court order had been fully complied …
The applicant, Shiv Kumar Solanki, filed an application under Section 528 of the Negotiable Instruments Act seeking to quash a summons issued by a Civil Judge in a Section 138 cheque‑bounce case. He argued that the dispute was essentially a money dispute and that there was a real prospect of …
Pooja Chadha filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The application was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. No substantive arguments or evidence were presented, and the application remained unprosecuted. The learned Additional …
The applicant filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash a Sessions trial (Criminal Case No. 427 of 2019) involving offences under Sections 504, 506 and 376 IPC. The parties had reached a written compromise, which was verified by the trial court, and the key prosecution witness indicated …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 10‑May‑2018, the cognizance order dated 5‑July‑2018 and the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 2936 of 2018) arising from offences under IPC sections 354(kha), 452, 323 and 308. Both parties …
Petitioner Mohd. Alam filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing authorities to protect his peaceful possession of a property and to act against the Gram Pradhan for alleged illegal interference. The Court examined whether it could entertain the petition, noting that the alleged interference …
Rati Traders filed a writ petition challenging an order of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The standing counsel for the respondents raised a preliminary objection, contending that the petitioner had an efficacious alternative remedy under Section 112 of the Goods and Services …
The petitioners, Monu @ Munendra Upadhyay, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04‑05‑2026 indicating that the …
Shahrukh was arrested in Crime No. 693 of 2024 under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 118(1) and 131 of the B.N.S. 2023 for allegedly causing gunshot and incised injuries to a victim. The FIR initially alleged that he and co‑accused Aamir fired a firearm, but the medical report later showed …
Ganesh Dixit applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0099 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 147, 352, 323, 504 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated due to a property dispute with his brother, who was the informant, and argued that the …
The applicant, Sanjeev Kushwaha, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash a September 2024 order of the Special Judge that dismissed his request for release of money in a narcotics trial. The order being challenged related to Session Trial No. …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Preetam Kumar Gupta, who was arrested in connection with FIR No. 652 of 2025 alleging offences under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 352, 64(2)M of the IPC and Sections 5(l) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that Gupta, under the …
The petitioner, Rupesh Kumar Mishra, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the …
Ankur Yadav filed a first appeal against Smt. Rinky Yadav in the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant, Anwar Ali, informed the court that the appellant no longer wishes to pursue the appeal. The respondent's counsel did not object to this request. The court, noting the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet in the matter had already been filed by the Director …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 1246 of 2024) initiated under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 117(2) and 110 of the B.N.S. The applicants and the State of U.P. had entered into a compromise, which was …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …
The petitioners, Smt. Monika Singh and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a …
The petitioner Imran filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the police. The Court noted that the …
The petitioners, Manjeet Singh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Advocate General, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been …
The petitioners, Raju Goswami, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that the police had …
The petitioner Dharmendra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the Advocate General, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court noted that the filing …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed. The Court …
The petitioners Jitendra Singh Yadav and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been …
The applicant, Smt. Nusharat Jahan, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to prosecute the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The …
The petitioners Yashwant Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge‑sheet by the police, invoking Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petition sought relief to quash the charge‑sheet. The High Court observed that the charge‑sheet had …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed by the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director …
The petitioner, Saud Ali Khan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the Allahabad High Court, with counsel Abhishek Mishra representing the petitioner and G.A. and Vijay Kumar Dwivedi representing the State of U.P. The court …
The petitioner, Priyanka, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ petition and …
The petitioner, Anurag Dubey, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 6505 of 2022 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioner and no interim order was passed. The Court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. Consequently, the …
The petitioners, Ashish @ Shankar and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that a …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by its learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted …
The petitioners Navneet Prajapati challenged the registration of an FIR before the Allahabad High Court, alleging impropriety. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed against the …
The petitioners, Sushila Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The petition was heard in the Allahabad High Court, with counsel for the petitioners absent and the State represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court …
The applicant Ateeq Ahmad Khan filed a contempt application alleging that the Nagar Nigam, Varanasi demolished his house without complying with a writ order that required acquisition or compensation. The demolition was carried out on 9 February 2026 under a notice issued on 31 January 2026 pursuant …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …
The petitioners, Phoolchand and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, appeared, while the petitioners were absent. The court examined a report dated …
