Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 9801–10000
Rakesh Trivedi and others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court's intervention. The opposite parties, the State of Uttar Pradesh and another, were represented by counsel. No case was listed for the applicants, and they were not present before …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from potential arrest. The State's Additional Government Advocate indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the …
The petitioners, Amit Pandey and Sumit Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. …
Petitioners Anuj and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, noting the …
The petition was filed by a minor, Vishal Yadav, seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The State's Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted that, pending …
The petitioner, Sarvesh Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the prospect of his arrest. The State of Uttar Pradesh submitted that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the …
The petitioner, Satyam Kannaujiya, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the prospect of his arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …
Amit Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest after a charge sheet was filed against him. The State informed the court that while the charge sheet had been submitted, it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High …
Shiva @ Shivam filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest after a charge sheet was filed by the investigating officer. The State of U.P. and two others responded, and the learned Additional Government Advocate indicated that while the charge sheet had been …
The petitioners, Jitendra Kumar and four others, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 6718 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and three others. The petition alleged that mediation between the parties had been attempted but was unsuccessful. The …
The petitioner, Mrityunjay Tiwari, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 11579 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel was absent while the respondents’ counsel and the standing counsel were present. The court noted the non‑appearance of the petitioner’s …
Petitioners Mohammad Yusuf and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …
Petitioner Shivam Chodhary filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State of U.P. submitted that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim …
Petitioner Mamta Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 10-07-2025 registered under Section 103(1) of the BNS. The State, through the Advocate General, submitted that the investigating officer had already forwarded the final police report on 03-04-2026 under …
Petitioners Shailesh Kumar and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. They contended that although a charge sheet had been filed by the investigating officer, the court had not yet taken cognizance of the police report. The State, represented by the …
The petitioner, Sujeet Kumar Sonkar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to consider and issue a fishery lease (Machhli Palan Patta) for a specific plot of land in Kaushambi district. The petitioner claimed he was the highest bidder for …
Mukesh Khurana filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State of U.P. submitted that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, noting the existence of an interim order in the …
In a criminal miscellaneous writ petition, Abhishek Chauhan sought relief against arrest after a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, confirmed the filing of the …
Petitioners Naeema and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. …
The applicants filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 604 of 2023 in the Allahabad High Court seeking to shift the pending suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application, while the respondent’s counsel, Shekhar Gangal, was present. The court noted …
The petitioners, Hina and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The High Court earlier issued an interim order directing the petitioners to deposit a specified amount to explore settlement through the Mediation and Conciliation …
Petitioners Satendra Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. …
Rohit Sharma applied for bail in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 10136 of 2026, seeking release in case No. 49 of 2026 under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. His counsel argued that the FIR was vague, did not fall within the definition of …
Petitioners Anoop Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue the petition. The Court noted the absence of representation and, consequently, dismissed the …
Petitioners Noor and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State of U.P. and two others, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …
Hajura Singh and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging their potential arrest. The State of U.P. submitted that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court, noting the existence of an interim …
The petitioner, Suman Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. …
Petitioners Babli and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court, noting the existence of an …
The High Court entertained a habeas corpus petition filed by the State of U.P. and others seeking custody of Shivani Sharma, a major adult who had married Banti Kumar against her parents' wishes. The petitioners alleged that Shivani was being unlawfully detained by her parents and sought a court …
The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) in Kanpur Nagar to decide the pending suit (Case No. 1226 of 2021) expeditiously. The High Court noted that the suit remains pending and that keeping the writ petition alive would serve …
The appellant, Faiz @ Shahfaiz, appealed against the order denying bail in a murder case filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several IPC provisions. The FIR alleged that the deceased was assaulted and killed by a group of accused, including the appellant. The defence …
The applicant Lokendra filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the Session Judge's order dated 16‑03‑2026 that rejected his request to place a newspaper dated 28‑03‑2022 on record. The trial court had already heard the defence and was about to pronounce judgment in a …
The petitioners, Union of India and others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners submitted that no cause of action remained, rendering the petition infructuous. The court examined the submission and found that the petition no longer …
The applicant, a Revenue Inspector, was arrested for allegedly demanding Rs.10,000 in a land‑mutation case and was caught with the money. He has no prior criminal record and has been in custody since 19‑Feb‑2026. The State opposed bail but did not allege any risk of evidence tampering, witness …
The petitioner, Jai Narayan Pandey, filed Writ‑A No. 4104 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the day of hearing, and the petitioner himself was also absent. The same situation had occurred on an earlier date when the petitioner's counsel was …
The appellant, Shrikant Lodhi, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking to set aside a bail denial order dated 19 January 2026 and to obtain bail in a case involving multiple offences including assault and …
The petitioner, Praval Singh Chauhan alias Ankur, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the prospect of his arrest. The State of Uttar Pradesh and three others were respondents, and the petition was filed before the Allahabad High Court. The learned Additional Government Advocate …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Vinod Gautam, who was arrested in a POCSO case (Crime No. 46 of 2025) alleging sexual offences against a 15‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was delayed, the alleged victim was a consenting adult …
Shiv Mangal, a 72‑year‑old retired teacher, was arrested in a case involving alleged misappropriation of an excess pension amount of Rs.5,37,408 and charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66(D) of the IT Act. He contended that the excess amount was inadvertently credited …
The applicant, Indresh Singh Chauhan, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 0344/2025) involving multiple IPC offences. He claimed innocence, asserted that he was not named in the FIR, and argued that no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jayram, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 98 of 2026 under several sections of the B.N.S. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR named only unknown persons, and that no incriminating material or …
The petitioner, Mritunjay Jai Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Director General of Police, submitted a charge-sheet, which was reflected in an office report dated 4 May 2026. The Court noted that …
The applicant Sonu filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the Sessions Trial (No.320 of 2016) for offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO sections 3 and 4. He asserted that he had married the victim in 2016, they have two children, and the victim and her …
The petitioner, Sunil Musaddi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Nagar Palika Parishad, Mirzapur to demolish the Musaddi Dharmshala, which was deemed dilapidated, and also requested police protection for the demolition. The petition relied on a notice dated 09-10-2025 issued by …
The Committee of Management of S.M. College filed a writ petition seeking recognition of its election held on 5 October 2025. The Vice Chancellor of Guru Jambheshwar University had refused recognition, alleging that the election was invalid because it was conducted without a university‑appointed …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad heard Criminal Appeal No. 1821 of 2011 filed by Bahadur against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The appeal was dismissed by a bench comprising Hon’ble Justice Salil Kumar Rai and Hon’ble Justice Dr. Ajay Kumar‑II. The court directed that the orders be as per the …
Petitioners Priya Kashyap and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three others. Their counsel submitted that the petitioners' parents had agreed to and recognized their marriage and that there was no threat to the petitioners' …
Kamal Singh was arrested in a murder case (Criminal No. 0206 of 2022) charged under Sections 302, 201, 120‑B, 420 and 34 of the IPC. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and that his name only appeared in the statement of another accused, with no incriminating material linking him …
The High Court examined five connected criminal appeals arising from a 2008 trial in which six accused were convicted of murder and related offences for the killing of Pushpraj. The prosecution relied on the testimony of two injured eyewitnesses, Manoj Kumar and his sister‑in‑law Vimla Devi, who …
The petitioners, both adults, married under Hindu rites on 18 March 2026 and live together as husband and wife. The petitioner’s grandmother objected and lodged an FIR under Section 137(2) of the Indian Penal Code, alleging kidnapping. The petitioners contended that the FIR was an abuse of process …
The applicant, Shafique Ahmad, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the summons issued by a Judicial Magistrate in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed by Nasim Ahmad. The court examined the contention that the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 550 of 2025, which arose from an alleged offence under Section 325 of the same Act and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The applicant …
The petitioners filed a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order dated 31.01.2024 of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ghaziabad, which had affirmed a lower court's decision granting maintenance of Rs.20,000 per month to the wife under Section 23 of the …
Petitioners Smt. Priti Singh and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They failed to appear for hearing on the scheduled dates of 31 March 2026, 22 April 2026, and again on 6 May 2026, despite being listed. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State appeared, but …
The applicant Guddu filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 27‑11‑2019, the cognizance order dated 30‑01‑2021, and the entire proceedings of Case No.84 of 2021 (State vs. Satyendra Singh and others) relating to a theft offence …
The petitioners, Sachin and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an ongoing criminal investigation. The Attorney General informed the Court that the police investigation had been completed and a report had been filed against the …
Petitioner Mrs. Hari Sumit Aarya filed a writ petition seeking permission to apply for a dealership. After filing, she discovered a brochure and other materials and decided to withdraw the petition and re‑file it afresh. The petition was not yet argued before the court. The learned judges allowed …
The applicant, Amit Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No. 175 of 2025) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 105, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) arising from a property dispute. He claimed innocence, no prior criminal record, and that …
The applicant, Smt. Krishna Jaiswal, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNS seeking an order directing the trial court to expedite a criminal case (State of U.P. v. Satya Narayan) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoria, which involves offences under Sections 420 and 406 of …
Petitioner Ramashrey filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents, including a private individual (respondent No.5). The State's standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petition was not maintainable …
The petitioner, Satish Chandra Shukla, filed Writ A No. 4678 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner during the hearing. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution, ordering the …
The petitioner, Babu Ram, a Class III employee, challenged a recovery order of Rs. 2,11,147 made from his retirement dues on the ground that the excess amount arose from a wrong fixation of his pay scale, for which he bore no responsibility and had not given any undertaking. The petitioner relied on …
Petitioners Priti and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 6812 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Jitendra Singh and Vipin Kumar, were listed in the cause list but failed to appear to press the petition. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State …
The petitioner, Anil Kumar Gupta, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondents No.2 and No.3 (State of U.P. and others) to pay his pending dues with interest and to close the agreement. He alleged that a representation he filed on 4 March 2022 before respondent No.3 remained …
The petitioner, Govind Prasad Agarwal, filed a transfer application before the Allahabad High Court. No further steps were taken to prosecute the application, and the petitioner failed to appear. The respondent, Laxmi Kant Jha, was represented and opposed the application. The Court observed the lack …
Petitioner Nikhilesh Kumar, owner of a motor vehicle seized in Criminal Case No. 214 of 2025, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate that released the vehicle subject to a personal bond of Rs.8,00,000 and additional sureties. He …
Petitioners Smt. Puja and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed but the petitioners failed to appear on the scheduled dates, including the revised list on 22 April 2026. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State appeared, but no petitioner …
Shivani filed a civil transfer application (No. 677 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court seeking to shift the proceedings to another court. No counsel appeared on her behalf to prosecute the application, while the opposite party's counsel, Chandra Prakash Tiwari, was present. The court noted the …
Smt. Kavita Yadav filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 675 of 2023 against Vikash Yadav in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The Court held that a transfer application must be prosecuted and, in the absence of any …
Arendra Yadav applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 642 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 147, 188, 307, 504, 506, 120B of the IPC and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated, stating that the FIR originally named four accused and about 50 unknown …
Manoj Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State of U.P. and others responded, indicating that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The petitioners argued that arrest should …
Ripunjay Singh filed a writ petition challenging an order passed by the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petitioner sought a declaration in paragraph 46 of the petition, asserting that the order could not be appealed. The High Court observed that the declaration was incorrect …
Dr. Shweta Gupta filed a transfer application (civil) No. 652 of 2022 against Abhijat Kumar in the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Abhay Singh Tomar, Adarsh Bhushan and Ishwar Chandra Tyagi, appeared before the bench. The respondent's counsel, Sri Satvik Chaudhary, appearing on behalf …
A public interest litigation was filed by Vijay Bharadwaj and nine others against the State of Uttar Pradesh and six other respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, while the State respondents and one respondent were represented. The Court dismissed the writ petition on the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 26‑09‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 30‑10‑2025 in a case involving offences under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 and 109 of the IPC. The High Court examined …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Faheem Uddin, who was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the B.N.S. Act and Section 66D of the Income Tax Act for alleged forgery and related offences. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, noting that the …
The petitioners, Bharat Singh and Ramharakh Singh, sought to set aside an order of the Additional District & Sessions Judge and a subsequent order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate that rejected their application under Section 173(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, alleging harassment by a court …
The petitioner, Praveen Kumar Upadhyay, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to enforce an order dated 22 May 2024 that ordered removal of illegal encroachments under Section 210 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, …
The petitioners, Smt. Vijyabharti and her husband, married after attaining majority and applied for online registration of their marriage. They alleged that a private respondent (No. 4) threatened them and interfered with their marital life, seeking a writ of mandamus under Article 226 to prevent …
The Committee of Management and another filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The matter was heard by Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery of the Allahabad High Court. The court dismissed the petition. The order directs that details be …
The petitioner, Sangeeta Agarwal, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking the grant of a family pension and related benefits. The petition challenged the denial of her representation for the pension by the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The Court examined whether …
The petitioners, Smt. Kumari Lakshmi and her spouse, married after attaining majority and applied for online registration of their marriage. They alleged that a private respondent (No. 4) threatened them and interfered with their marital life, prompting them to seek a writ of mandamus under Article …
The applicant, Smt. Ruchi Tiwari, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 699 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while counsel for the opposite party, Sri Avnish, was present. The Court …
The petitioner, Ojas Shandilya, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was argued by senior counsel Jigar Khare and Shivendu Ojha. The court, after hearing, observed that the petition lacked sufficient particulars and directed that it be dismissed. However, the court …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking relief against the Union of India and others. The High Court directed the petitioner to join the concerned institution on 7 May 2026 at 10 a.m. and to report before the concerned respondent, who would permit his joining. The respondents' counsel informed …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by Shamshad Ahamad, who was implicated in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged against …
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 38120 of 2014) against the State of U.P. and another respondent. The petition was to be heard before a bench of Hon'ble Justices Saral Srivastava and Garima Prashad. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the …
The applicant, Ram Soorat Singh, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 681 of 2022 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The Court also vacated …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 39169 of 2014) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the day of hearing. The Court observed that the petition could not be proceeded with in the absence of representation. Consequently, the writ petition …
The petitioner, Faim Ahmad, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet against him. The State informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been submitted. The petitioner’s counsel did not contest this fact but expressed a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravi, who was in custody for Crime No. 171 of 2025 under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the IPC, alleging abduction and marriage of a girl who was claimed to be a minor. Ravi contended that the relationship was consensual, the girl was now his wife, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Saif Ali, who is charged with offences under Sections 394, 506, 411, 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/25(1B) of the Arms Act. The applicant contended that he …
The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, filed Writ‑A No. 4829 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered the petitioner to pay a cost of Rs.1,000 to the High Court Legal Services Committee. The order also …
The appellant, Jamal Ahmad, appealed against the acquittal of accused persons in a matrimonial dispute case under Sections 498A and 406 IPC, which had been set aside by the Fast Track Court. During the hearing, both parties indicated that the matrimonial dispute had been amicably settled and the …
The applicant, Heeralal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 16‑03‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 28‑01‑2026, and the entire proceedings of State v. Heeralal (Case No. 114 of 2026) relating to offences under …
Petitioner Rishu Dubey filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. …
The petitioners, tenants of shops in Dalmandi, Varanasi, sought a writ of mandamus to prevent the District Magistrate and other officials from demolishing their premises for a road‑widening project without following lawful acquisition procedures. The High Court earlier disposed of the writ, …
The applicant, Deepak Agrawal, was a tenant in a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 31841 of 2025) seeking a mandamus to stop demolition of his shop for a road‑widening project. The High Court had ordered that any acquisition must be through voluntary transfer or compulsory acquisition under the Right to …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Abdul Rahman @ Jasim, who was in custody for offences under Sections 316(5) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant claimed innocence and cited …
The applicant, Iftikhar Mirza, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit to another court. No counsel or party appeared to argue the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim order …
The applicant, Smt. Neelam Yadav, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 726 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit to another court. The application was listed but no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the matter. The court noted the lack of …
Petitioners Anshika Singh and Salman Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 28.03.2026 in which they were not named and for which no wanted report existed. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, raised a preliminary objection that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Suraj, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 98 of 2026) involving offences under sections 281, 125A, 125B, 109, 117(2), 191(2), 191(3), 352 and 324(4) of the B.N.S. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a criminal complaint (Case No. 31/2019) that alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 325, 504, 506, 354 and Section 3(1)(dha) of the SC/ST Act. A compromise deed dated 27‑03‑2025 had been …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ram Sewak, accused in Crime No. 811 of 2025 under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the charges of sexual exploitation and falsifying certificates were false and motivated by …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the respondents to implement a 2008 order of a revenue court under sections 33 and 39 of the Land Revenue Act, which directed registration of an FIR against certain employees and parties. The petitioner argued …
Petitioner Smt Nidhi Choudhary challenged an ex‑parte judgment of the Family Court that declared her second marriage void. The High Court examined two earlier appeals, one against the ex‑parte judgment and another against a subsequent judgment rejecting her condonation of delay. It found that the …
The petitioner, Arun Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge (POCSO), Shamli, to decide Criminal Revision No.45/2024, which has been pending since 2024. The petitioner argued that the delay violated the principle of speedy justice and …
The petitioners, Shri Hari Trading Company and another, filed Writ‑C No. 16116 of 2026 challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. The respondents, including the State and the Nagar Nigam, pointed out that the petitioners had earlier filed a similar writ, Writ‑C No. 35328 of 2025, on the …
The petitioner, Rama Rani, filed a writ petition seeking promotion. During the pendency of the petition, the grievance regarding the promotion was resolved by the authorities. The petitioner's counsel requested that the writ petition be disposed of on this ground. The State's standing counsel had no …
The petitioner, Aditya Narayan Maurya, alleged that his father's electric connection, installed for a bore‑well, was non‑functional yet electricity bills continued to be raised. He filed an application on 29 January 2026 with the supply company (respondent No.2) seeking redress. The petitioner …
The appellant, Devendra Singh Verma, appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to set aside a Special Judge's order denying bail in a case involving alleged caste‑related abuse, cheating, and forgery. The FIR alleged that the …
The petitioner, Kanhaniya Indene Gas Service, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel announced at the Bar that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The State’s Additional Government …
The applicant, Sambhavi Singh, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the pending civil suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The opposite party, Sachin Singh, was represented by counsel. The Court observed …
Smt. Pratibha Singh, an officiating Headmistress, filed a writ petition challenging the adequacy of her current salary. The petition was filed against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The High Court examined the grievance but did not issue a substantive order on the salary …
Vishal Singh filed a writ petition alleging that the State of Uttar Pradesh illegally retained Rs.6,16,413 of his post‑retiral benefits for about ten months before refunding the amount on 2 May 2026. The petitioner sought interest on the delayed payment, arguing that the retention was unlawful. The …
Smt. Nusharat Ara filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 737 of 2023 against Jahangir Ahmad in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel or party appeared to argue the application, resulting in a lack of prosecution. The Court, presided by Justice Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, dismissed the transfer …
The petitioners, Rakesh Kumar and another, challenged orders dated 6 July 2023 (by a Judicial Magistrate) and 7 December 2024 (by a revisional court) that summoned them under Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections …
Jagvir and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The investigation in the matter had already concluded, and a charge sheet was filed on 3 April 2026. The petitioners, through counsel, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Deputy Director of Consolidation Officer, Jaunpur, to decide a restoration application dated 13 January 2023, which was filed after a revision was dismissed on 29 November 2022 without a hearing. The petitioner argued that the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sandhya (Pinky), sister of a co-accused, in a criminal case (Crime No. 233 of 2025) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 108, 316(2) and 352. The applicant argued that the allegations were false, she posed no …
Harey Krishan Pandey filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8087 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner stated that he no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The State’s Additional Government Advocate raised no objection …
Platoon Commander Gyanendra Singh filed a writ petition challenging an order of transfer dated 11 March 2025 issued by the Inspector General of Police (Establishment), Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner contended that the transfer was illegal and sought relief from the High Court. The respondents argued …
The petitioner, Shubham Pandey, filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 30.03.2026 that alleged his involvement in the recovery of 121.45 kg of ganja, invoking Sections 8, 20, 25 of the NDPS Act and Section 207 of the Motor Vehicle Act. The FIR was based on information from an informer …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Basti to decide a representation they had filed on 22 May 2025 concerning compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Pushpendra Kumar, who is accused under IPC sections 498‑A, 304‑B and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in a case registered as Crime No. 65 of 2023. The applicant argued that the allegations were false, he …
Arshad Alias Adwani filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant was represented by counsel Rizwan Ullah Siddiqui, while the State was represented by G.A. The counsel for the applicant submitted that the …
The petitioner, Rooprani, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 18 February 2026 issued by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Kannauj, which granted interim protection in a title revision filed by the respondents without hearing the petitioner. The petitioner alleged …
Sunil Kumar filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8562 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. While the petition was pending, the petitioner was arrested. Counsel for the petitioner then informed the Court that, in view of the arrest, the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and …
The petitioner, Devendra Shukla, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel stated that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The State’s Additional Government Advocate raised no …
The applicant sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 90 of 2026) involving alleged gang-rape of a minor under Sections 70(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the FIR was delayed, there was no medical evidence, and the charges were politically …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vijay Kumar Gautam, who was charged under Sections 3, 5-A and 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, Section 109(1) of the same Sanhita, and Sections 3 …
The applicant, Rajeev Kumar @ Raju, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant even after a revised call. The court noted the …
The applicant, who was the informant in a fraud case involving forged lease deeds to claim agricultural insurance, sought to quash a fresh cognizance order dated 23.03.2026 that omitted Section 420 IPC. The order had been issued by the Civil Judge (SD) at Chhata, Mathura after a prior order was set …
The petitioner, Hambir Singh, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8099 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that he no longer wished to pursue the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused Kamlesh Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged fraud and forgery under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 411. The …
Vishal was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 321 of 2025) under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. The victim, a 17‑year‑old, had allegedly traveled with Vishal, stayed with him, and married him, and her statement under Section 183 B.N.S.S. …
The applicant, Akash Tiwari, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal case (State Vs. Akash Tiwari) filed under sections relating to dowry harassment and other offences. The court examined the material and held that, at the interlocutory stage, it could not be …
Lalman Prasad applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 23 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 333, 351(3) and 64(1) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed he was falsely implicated, noting a two‑month delay in filing the FIR and that the allegation of circulating an indecent …
The applicants Kaliyan and two others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 16‑12‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 13‑10‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 1210 of 2025, which arose from Crime No. 513 of 2024 and alleged offences under Sections 115(2), …
The High Court noted that in Writ-A No. 11718 of 2025 it had directed the petitioner to present his case before the respondent within three months. The opposite party subsequently filed a compliance affidavit stating that the claim was decided on 29 April 2026, attaching the decision as annexure. On …
Man Bahadur Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S seeking to quash the charge‑framing order dated 14‑12‑2021 and a subsequent order dated 17‑09‑2025 in a criminal case where he was charged under Sections 419, 406, 420, 506 and 120B IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 420 …
The applicants, Mukesh Chauhan and three others, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a criminal case involving multiple offences. The High Court noted that the applicants had not approached the Sessions Court for anticipatory bail and sought to withdraw the …
Petitioner Prabhunath Prasad filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondent to call records of two cases and decide them based on an earlier decree and a consolidation order. The respondent raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Rule …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramchandra Yadav under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated and pointed to the bail granted to co‑accused in similar cases. The State did …
The applicant, Vidya Devi, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 28‑04‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 01‑01‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 2901 of 2026. She contended that the offences alleged – Section 352 and Section 351(2) of the BNS – are …
Anchal Sharma filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 103(1), 238-A and 61(2) of the B.N.S. in Criminal Misc. No. 23 of 2026, claiming innocence and asserting that no offence was committed. The State, represented by the Advocate General, argued that the allegations against the …
The petitioners, Smt. Ishu and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Moradabad to decide a pending succession suit (Suit No. 158 of 2025) filed under section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The petition sought an …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet, cognizance and summoning orders in a case where they were charged under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 and 507 IPC. They contended that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) cannot be …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of the chargesheet dated 21‑12‑2021, the cognizance and summoning order dated 14‑01‑2022, and the non‑bailable warrant dated 14‑11‑2022, along with the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 49 of 2022 …
The applicant, Tanuj, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 29‑09‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 11‑02‑2025, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 90 of 2025 (State vs. Tanuj) arising from an FIR under Section …
The applicant, Pankaj Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 21‑05‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 29‑09‑2025 in State v. Pankaj Singh. He contended that the offences alleged – Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNSS – are …
The applicant, Yogesh @ Mukul, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS for offences including Sections 309(6), 311, 312, 317(2), 3(5), 109(1) of the BNSS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the only evidence against him was his own …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
Ram Kumar Singh filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking compensation for 0.144 hectare of his land that was used for constructing a canal, relying on a recommendation dated 06‑09‑2019 issued by the Executive Engineer. The land had earlier been the subject of a 2015 writ (Writ‑C No. 68956 of …
The applicant, Chandrakesh, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in Session Trial No. 1195 of 2026, alleging that the case against him rests solely on extra‑judicial confessions and lacks any other evidence. The State opposed, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 14‑04‑2025 and a cognizance order dated 30‑07‑2025 in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the BNSS. The sole argument advanced was that these offences are …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Irfan, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …
The petitioner, Vivek Yadav, filed a Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition (No. 8098 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue …
The applicants, Mohd Mohsin and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 30‑06‑2022 and a cognizance order dated 17‑12‑2022 in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 324, 325, 504, 506 and 308 of the Indian Penal …
The applicants, Smt Rekha and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the cognizance and summoning order dated 27‑10‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 21600 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 420, 406 and 506 IPC. They contended, relying on a Supreme …
The petitioner, Dileep Kumar Batham, filed a writ petition challenging an order related to the qualification of respondent No.5 and the date of consideration for promotion. The petitioner’s counsel, Alok Dwivedi, expressed that he did not wish the Court to decide the matter on its merits after …
The petitioner, Atul Kumar Dubey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and police to conduct a fair, impartial and time‑bound investigation into FIR No. 210 of 2025. He alleged that despite the FIR being registered on 26‑07‑2025, the police had not …
The petitioner, Mangal Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the continuation of proceedings after a charge sheet had been filed against him. The State’s Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation was complete …
Petitioner Arif Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The …
Maya Verma filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kanpur Nagar, to decide Original Suit No. 20 of 2016 and several pending applications, including a compromise application dated 24‑09‑2019. The High Court observed that the underlying suit …
Petitioner Raghunath and another filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Arun Kumar Singh, sought to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue appropriate proceedings later. The respondent's counsel, Bhawani …
The petitioner, Arvind Mohan Gaur, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) Court, Prayagraj, to decide the pending Original Suit No. 696 of 2025 within a stipulated period. The petition specifically invoked Order 39 Rule 1,2 read with Section …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Isham @ Hisham, who was charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …
The petitioners, a group of 106 candidates, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to extend the benefit of a Supreme Court judgment dated 29 January 2025 (State of U.P. v. Neeraj Kumar Pandey) to their claims for appointment as Assistant Teachers (Mathematics …
The petitioner, Aditya Prasad Sonkar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to decide his representations dated 10 October 2025 and 23 March 2026 within a reasonable time. He alleged that despite multiple representations, the authorities had not …
Gaurav Gupta filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8561 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection. The court considered the petitioner's …
The Allahabad High Court heard a second bail application filed by Rahul Yadav, accused under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the same Act in a dowry‑death case (Crime No. 291 of 2024). The applicant contended that he was innocent, had been incarcerated for …
Gayatri Devi filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving offences under Sections 384, 506 and 420 of the IPC. While seeking anticipatory bail, she later requested to withdraw the application and instead move a regular bail application …
A petition under Article 227 was filed by Radhey Shyam Pandey against the State of U.P. and two others. The petitioner was to be represented by counsel Rahul Sharma and Sikandar Gupta. On the date of hearing, no representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The court held that a petition …
The petitioners, Niranjana Singh and another, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to prevent private respondents from selling ancestral land and to compel certain administrative actions. They alleged that private respondents were attempting an illegal sale of the property. The court observed that …
Petitioner Ikbaal Khan filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8559 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, stated that he no longer wishes to pursue the petition and seeks to withdraw it. The respondent's Additional Government Advocate …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to the City Magistrate of Gorakhpur to decide a criminal case (Case No.17471 of 2024) concerning alleged encroachment under Section 133 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 152 of the B.N.S.S. Act. The magistrate had …
The applicants, Viabhav Mishra and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the application. The opposing party's counsel …
The petitioners, Jawahar Lal and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had …
Maneesh filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8558 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the Uttar Pradesh Rajya Dwara Pramukh Sachiv (Grah) and others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Shri Rajesh Yadav, announced that the petitioner no …
The petitioners filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8574 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The Assistant Government Advocate (AGA) for the …
The petitioners, Shivam and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that the police had …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Mohammad Mohsin, who is charged with offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 411. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that his name was added to …
Manoj applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 160 of 2025, charged under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 109 of the IPC. A prior bail application was rejected because the injured party alleged that Manoj struck him with a brass metal punch. In the second application, counsel argued that the primary …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Saikal @ Hamid, who is charged under IPC sections 307, 353, 332, 429 and sections of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that no …
The petitioners Ompal and seven others filed a writ petition challenging two orders that removed their names from the khatauni of a property: one dated 29‑08‑2025 by the Additional Commissioner (Administration) and another dated 28‑07‑2023 by the Sub‑Divisional Officer under section 38(2) of the …
The applicants, Ajay Tiwari and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 25‑10‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 26‑11‑2025 in State v. Ajay Tiwari. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 221, 352 and 351(3) of the BNSS are …
The petitioners Om Prakash filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The petition was heard after the charge‑sheet had already been filed by the police, as per the legal cell report dated 4 May 2026. The court noted that the petition sought to quash the …
H & V Advanced Material (India) Pvt Ltd filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner, Grade‑2 (Appeal) to decide GST Appeal No. 029/2018 under Section 129(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner alleged undue …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ramdevi under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a death case (Crime No. 32 of 2026). The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the allegations against her were false, that she had no direct involvement, and …
The petitioner, Aman Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and seek liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The State’s counsel raised no …
Hariram filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Azamgarh, to decide Application No.27 Ga 2 for recalling an ex‑parte order dated 04‑04‑2023 in case No. 246 of 2022 (Banshraji vs. Hariram). The Court noted that the underlying suit was still …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the chargesheet and cognizance order dated 12.12.2025 in Criminal Case No.605 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 352, 351(3), 319(2), 318(4) and 316(2) BNS. The applicant contended that Sections 318(4) and 316(2) …
Harish Kumar filed a writ petition challenging the dismissal order dated 26‑05‑2023 issued by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Moradabad. The petitioner appealed that order to the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Moradabad, but the appeal was dismissed on 11‑11‑2025 on the ground that it was …
The petitioner, M/s Rj Namkinos, challenged an adjudication order dated 30‑04‑2026 and filed an appeal which was dismissed as time‑barred on 09‑09‑2025. Although the court granted time to amend the appeal, the petitioner failed to file any amendment and did not seek any relief against the appellate …
