Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 10001–10200

ASHA DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusRAJENDRA PRASAD SINGH

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Muhammadabad, Gohana, Mau, to decide Original Suit No. 50 of 2021 (Rajendra Prasad Singh v. Mevati & others) as expeditiously as possible. The petition sought only this supervisory direction and no …

DILSHAD KHAN @ BHOORE @ BHOORAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Dilshad Khan filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging an order dated 03.02.2026 that externed him for six months under Sections 3 and 4 of the U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970. He argued that two of the four cases on which the externment was based were either quashed or …

RAJ NARAYAN SHUKLAversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Raj Narayan Shukla filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 31‑12‑2025. He relied on a prior decision of this Court in Tej Pal Singh v. State of U.P. (Writ‑A No.7464 of 2019) which had been set aside and directed a fresh order for regularisation. The petitioner argued that the …

CHANDAN YADAV AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Chandan Yadav and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge sheet filed against them. The State informed the court that the investigation was complete and charge sheets had been submitted on 18 March 2025 …

ANIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Anil Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 13-07-2001, the cognizance and summoning order dated 24-07-2002, and the non‑bailable warrant dated 08-02-2006 in Criminal Case No. 9247 of 2001 (State vs. Anil …

M/S S.S. ENTERPRISES AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, M/s S.S. Enterprises and another, filed a writ petition alleging that the Municipal Commissioner of Nagar Nigam, Bareilly had failed to pay them the full amount due under a work order dated 25‑08‑2021 for construction of a CC road and drainage. They claimed a total liability of …

RAJENDRA KUMAR JAISWALversusVIRENDRA SONTHALIA

Petitioner Rajendra Kumar Jaiswal filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court under Article 227. The petitioner, through counsel Amit Pratap Singh, sought to withdraw the petition and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The petitioner also agreed to serve a copy of any fresh …

KUNAL SINGHAL AND 2 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Kunal Singhal and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the police investigation and report filed on 01.04.2026. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the investigation was complete and the police …

SAPNA @ RINKI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge sheet filed against them. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been filed on 13-11-2025. Petitioners did not contest these …

ABU TALAHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner challenged an order dated 4‑10‑2025 dismissing two assistant teachers, arguing that his own dismissal dispute could be decided independently of that matter. The respondents contended that the outcome of the other teachers' dismissal would affect the petitioner's relief. The court …

SANTOSH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Santosh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 8588 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had …

ANIL SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS

Petitioner Anil Singh and others filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the second respondent, a court, to decide suit No. 696 of 2025 pending since 2025. The petitioners alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the suit remained undecided and requested expeditious disposal. The High …

ASIF @ GUDDU BABUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 05‑04‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 09‑07‑2025 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Court No.9, Kanpur Nagar in Criminal Case No.98612 of 2025. The charge‑sheet …

RAVENDRA PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ravendra Pal Singh, was charged under Section 302 IPC for the death of his father‑in‑law. He claimed the death was accidental, caused by inhalation of an organophosphate insecticide, and that he was falsely implicated due to a property dispute. The FIR was lodged two years after the …

MUNNBARversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Munnbar, who was arrested in a case (Crime No. 49 of 2026) alleging penetrative sexual assault under Sections 333, 115(2), 351(3) of the BNS and Sections 3/4(2) of the …

HARISHARAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 CrPC for four individuals accused of offences under IPC sections 420, 468, 471, 120B and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The applicants, who were lekhpals, claimed innocence and argued that there was …

PRINCE PARMAR @ VIKAS PARMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Prince Parmar @ Vikas Parmar and Ritik, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a direction that the trial court not admit a certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act in the pending criminal case (State of U.P. v. Prince Parmar …

ANIL PRAJAPATIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Anil Prajapati, who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant asserted his …

VIJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vijay Kumar, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 3(1) and 2(b)(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) …

AVISHEK SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Avishek Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash a Session Court order dated 10 December 2025 that arose from a criminal appeal and a domestic‑violence proceeding. The order under challenge was based on Section 19(1) of the Domestic Violence …

RAMAPATI @ RAJPATI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ramapati, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 4267 of 2025 (State vs. Ramchandra) arising from FIR No. 145 of 2024. The High Court examined the FIR, the impugned order and the chargesheet …

ROHIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to compel the State of U.P. and others to decide his representation dated 09.02.2026 and to remove a Madaha (encroachment) on Arazi No.126. The Court held that the petitioner is merely a complainant and not an aggrieved party, and …

DHARMENDRA PALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Dharmendra Pal, who was arrested in a NDNDPS case (Section 8/18) for possession of 629 grams of opium. The applicant argued that the quantity was below …

JAIRAM AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the arbitration case No. 228/2022 (Jairam and others v. NHAI) be expedited under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which was pending before the Additional District & Session Judge, Ghaziabad. The …

SHANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shani, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of U.P. and two other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its …

SHIVAM PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shivam Pal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 29‑05‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 01‑01‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 1957 of 2026. The High Court examined the record …

SMT. KAMLA DEVIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Kamla Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Ghazipur to decide original suit No. 287/2024 within a stipulated period. The petition sought expeditious disposal of the pending suit. The High Court observed that …

MERAJ ALAMversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Meraj Alam applied for a passport but the Regional Passport Office in Lucknow refused to issue it, citing the pendency of a criminal case against him. He filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the issuance of the passport. The Court referred to its earlier decision in Pawan …

NAVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Navi, who was charged under Sections 65(1) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged two months after the alleged incident, that the victim’s statement under …

HUKUM SINGHversusSMT. SHIMLA

Hukum Singh filed a petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a compromise that he alleged to be fraudulent and fictitious, and sought appropriate legal proceedings against an order dated 13.07.2024. The petitioner contended that no genuine compromise had been entered into and that the …

PRINCE PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petition under habeas corpus was filed by Prince Pratap Singh seeking the release and custody of Muskan, who had been produced before the court by police officials. Muskan, a 22‑year‑old B.Sc. student, testified that she is lawfully married to the petitioner and wishes to live with him. The …

SMT SURAJMUKHIversusSMT VIDYAWATI

The petitioner, Smt. Surajmukhi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division)/F.T.C., Bareilly to execute a sale deed and to decide Execution Case No. 10 of 2022 pending before that judge. The petition raised the procedural question of whether the …

ASHISH GAUTAMversusVINITA GAUTAM

The petitioner, Ashish Gautam, married Vinita Gautam in 2011 and the couple have been living separately since January 2020. The petitioner filed a petition under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act on 19 February 2026, seeking divorce, and also applied for a cooling period, which the Family Court …

JITENDER AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash an FIR registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 131 and 351 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging that the alleged assault on the informant's sons was not substantiated. The FIR described an incident on 1 …

LAVI TYAGI @ AKASH TYAGI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Lavi Tyagi and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 06‑03‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 18‑06‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 297 of 2025 arising from Crime No. 36 of 2025. The High …

IMRAN URF KALAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Imran Urf Kala, who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted that …

AMIT JADVANI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS Act seeking to quash the chargesheet and cognizance order dated 31‑01‑2026 in State v. Amit Jadvani, alleging that the charge of criminal breach of trust (Section 316(2) BNS, equivalent to IPC 406) and cheating (Section 318(4) BNS, …

ISMILE AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ismile and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an ongoing investigation. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the police investigation had concluded and a charge sheet was filed on April …

NARENDRA SINGHversusMAHENDRA SING AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Narendra Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging a revisional court order that set aside an interim injunction granted under Section 151 of the CPC. The original suit sought a permanent injunction, and an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC for a temporary …

KRISHNA MOHAN MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Krishna Mohan Mishra, challenged an order dated 18.10.2022 by the Superintendent of Police, Ghazipur, which provided only original pension and dearness allowance pending a criminal case. The petitioner was acquitted of the charges on 21.11.2023 and sought payment of his final pension …

DHAVENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dhavendra, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8587 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner's counsel, Jitendra Kumar Yadav, was listed in the cause list but did not appear before the Court, nor was any other representative present to press the petition. …

SHANUversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shanu was arrested in connection with a sexual assault alleged to have occurred on 24.01.2026, initially charged under Sections 351(3) and 140(4) of the IPC and the POCSO Act. The victim, later found to be a 21‑year‑old adult, led to the removal of the POCSO provisions from the investigation. The …

ARIFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arif in a criminal case (Crime No. 249 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4(1) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, a …

SANTOSH @ ISHAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Santosh @ Isha, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case involving alleged violations of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, and provisions of the BNS. The applicant claimed innocence and …

SHAKIRversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shakir, who was arrested in connection with a case under Section 109(1) of the same Act and Sections 5A/8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant …

AKHAND PRATAP SINGH @ VIKKI SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Akhand Pratap Singh, who was charged with offences under multiple sections of the same Act and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant claimed …

PUNWASIversusBECHAN SINCE DECEASED AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Punwasi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No.19, Azamgarh, to decide a Restoration Application (Paper No. 4 Ga 2) that was filed as Misc. Case No. 01/2020 in Civil Suit No. 1330/2012 and has been …

SANTOSH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Santosh Kumar Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 14‑02‑2024 and the cognizance‑summoning order dated 22‑02‑2024 in Criminal Case No. 3250 of 2024, which alleged offences including cheating (Sec. 420 IPC) and criminal breach …

SANDEEP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 12 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sandeep Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to remove an obstacle obstructing his access to agricultural land, invoking Section 25 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2026 and paragraph 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual. He alleged that an order dated …

MANOJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Manoj, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended …

MITHLESH KUMARversusSHATRUGHAN PRASAD AND 41 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mithlesh Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Learned Civil Judge Junior Division, District Chitrakoot, to decide Original Suit No. 233 of 2014 against Shatrughan Prasad and others within a stipulated time. The petitioner’s counsel requested …

KULDEEP KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSATYAVEER SINGH AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners, Kuldeep Kumar and three others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Small Causes Court, Moradabad, to decide an ad interim injunction application (paper 6-C) in Original Suit No. 1047 of 2024. The petition alleged that the suit was pending and required …

PRADEEP KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

The petitioner, Pradeep Kumar Yadav, filed a PIL seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondents to remove private constructions on land recorded as Navin Parti in the revenue records. The respondents argued that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue …

BUDHSEN ALIAS VED PRAKASH AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a charge sheet dated 25‑02‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 08‑12‑2025, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 1366 of 2025 arising from FIR No. 657 of 2023. The High Court …

VIDYADHAR BHASKAR @ BHASKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 27‑10‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 20‑06‑2025 in a case alleging offences under Sections 406, 420 and 506 IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 …

FAIJAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 03‑07‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 23‑09‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 6862 of 2025. They contended that the offences alleged – Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) …

MOHITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohit, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 16374 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. During the pendency of the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel moved that the petition be dismissed as not …

DEEPANSHU GAUTAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Deepanshu Gautam, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging aspects of the investigation, during which additional serious charges were added. The State counsel acknowledged the addition of graver sections, which the petitioner did not dispute. However, the petitioner …

DINESH KUMAR GAUTAM @ DINESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar Gautam, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging aspects of the investigation. During the proceedings, the Additional Government Advocate informed the court that more serious charges had been added to the case. The …

ABHISHEKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Abhishek, who had previously been released on bail, failed to appear before the Special Judge (POCSO) and a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 07‑02‑2026 was issued against him in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 504, 506 and 304 IPC. He filed an application under …

ASHOK KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 05‑02‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 03‑01‑2026 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur. They contended that the offences alleged—Sections 352, 351(3) and 324(4) of the …

BRAJESH KASAUDHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case alleging offences under Sections 411, 413 and 414 IPC. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the investigating officer had not conducted a …

SANGAM SHAKAHARI BHOJNALAYAversusMOHAMMAD HASHRAT

The petitioner, Sangam Shakahari Bhojnalaya, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (JD) of Kanpur Nagar to decide an application (paper no.141c2 dated 08.07.2019) filed in the original suit No. 890 of 2017 against Mohammad Hashrat. The petitioner …

RANJAN KUMARI BHARTIversusAKHILESH KUMAR SINGH

The petitioner, Ranjan Kumari Bharti, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside a divorce order dated 01.01.2026 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Ghazipur, in Matrimonial Divorce Petition No. 766 of 2024, invoking Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The …

AMIT KUMAR AGRAWALversusSMT. VANDANA RANI AND 3 OTHER

The plaintiff Amit Kumar Agarwal filed two suits (No. 104 of 2008 and No. 1280 of 2014) concerning the same plots of land, leading to overlapping litigation. He sought a transfer under Section 24 of the CPC so that both suits would be heard by a single court, arguing that the property issues were …

SURENDRA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA) to consider their claim for allotment of 6% developed abadi land in lieu of land acquired from them. GNIDA opposed the relief, arguing it was not permissible under the applicable scheme. …

ABDUL RAHIMversusISLAM AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner Abdul Rahim filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Ghazipur to decide paper No. 16Ga dated 05.02.2026, which is pending in original suit No. 243/2025. The petitioner’s counsel requested an expeditious decision on the suit. The …

MOHD YUSUFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohd Yusuf, filed Writ Petition No. 17747 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel, Virendra Kumar Tiwari, submitted a prayer for withdrawal of the petition. The Court considered the request and, finding no objection from the …

THE METHODIST CHURCH IN INDIAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Methodist Church in India filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Respondents 2 and 3 objected that the petition was filed in the name of the Church without establishing that it is a legal entity capable of suing. The petitioner’s counsel could not provide any documentation to …

VIVEK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Vivek Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 24‑06‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 05‑08‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 41045 of 2025. The applicant contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 352 and …

TILESHAR LAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to hand over possession of three parcels of land in Deoria district pursuant to a consolidation order dated 24‑04‑2025, and also to consider an application filed on 16‑02‑2026 within the period fixed by the court. The …

DR. FARHAT BANOversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dr. Farhat Bano, filed a writ petition seeking two reliefs, but later instructed counsel to pursue only the second prayer, which sought consideration of a representation for fixation of pension in accordance with law. The High Court examined the petition and determined that the …

GAURAV RAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gaurav Rai, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 9500 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, stating that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue it. The Additional Government …

RENUversusMONTI SAINI

The petitioner, Renu, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Bijnor, to decide a pending matrimonial case (Case No. 1199 of 2025) filed under Section 13‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petition alleged that the Family Court had …

SACHINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The revisionist, Sachin, filed a criminal revision challenging the Additional Session Judge's order refusing to recall witness PW‑2 for further cross‑examination under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He argued that certain points remained unaddressed and that the trial court failed to …

SMT. RAMSAKHI AND ANOTHERversusRAMNIVAS AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking to set aside two lower court orders and to obtain a mandamus directing the respondents not to disturb their possession of disputed plots, along with costs. The petition also requested liberty to file a fresh petition due to a technical defect. Counsel …

ABID AHMAD ALIAS SHAKILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed by Abid Ahmad (alias Shakil), who had been in custody since September 2017 for an alleged murder under Section 304 IPC. The applicant argued that the trial had been unduly delayed, with only three of ten prosecution witnesses …

MAHAVIR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking a stay of the criminal proceedings and bail, alleging that they had not yet been arrested and that the lower court's order of detention was unwarranted. The High Court examined the allegations, noting that they pertained to …

DEENA @ DEENANATHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Deena @ Deenanath, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …

SMT. HOSHIYARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Hoshiyari, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Learned District & Sessions Judge, Bulandshahr, to decide her application dated 16 September 2025 for a stay of execution proceedings arising from a judgment dated 20 August 2025 in Civil Case No. 862 …

SMT. GEETAversusSUNITA AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Geeta, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Basti to decide Original Suit No. 577 of 2017 (Bhanmati v. Sahbaraj Singh) and the accompanying Section 6C application for an interim injunction within a stipulated period. …

RAHUL KORI @ MUSA @ RAJESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rahul Kori, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case registered under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act where 36 kg of ganja was allegedly recovered from a vehicle he was travelling in. He contended that the mandatory provisions of …

SRIRAM @ SANDEEP AND 4 OTHERSversusOM PRAKASH AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Sriram @ Sandeep and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) of Court No. 10, Deoria, to decide Suit No. 539 of 2022 (Om Prakash and another v. Sriram @ Sandeep and others) within a time‑bound period. The sole relief claimed was …

ROHIT KUMARversusSMT POOJA

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Bareilly, to decide his pending divorce petition (No. 172 of 2025) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner’s counsel requested an expeditious …

AKHILESH KUMAR JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar Jaiswal, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Ved Prakash Mishra, submitted that the petition was not pressed and that the …

UMASHANKAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered bail application No. 13713 of 2026 filed by Umashankar Yadav under Sections 2/3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that the FIR was vague, did not disclose any act falling within the …

VIKASversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Vikas filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 25‑09‑2025 issued by the Additional Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate in a complaint case under Sections 115(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that the magistrate had taken …

ROHIT @ FUTTA KANJHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rohit @ Futta Kanjhan, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) …

ANITAversusR KUMAR @ RAJU KUMAR

Anita filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that R Kumar willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 20‑11‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 40724 of 2025. The order was served on the opposite party on 08‑12‑2025, but the court found that the party had …

SHANKY ANANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Shanky Anand filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑11‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 24‑03‑2026 in a criminal case (Case No.30 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 108 and 351(2) BNS. He contended that he was falsely …

MD RIZWAN KHAN @ RIZWAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Md Rizwan Khan and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of the chargesheet dated 28‑09‑2019 and the cognizance order dated 18‑11‑2019 in a case pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur. They alleged that they were …

SAMEER ABBAS AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 12‑08‑2025 and a summons order dated 24‑12‑2025 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Sambhal, in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 352 and 351(3) of the BNSS. The sole contention …

PREM KISHORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, a university employee, was suspended on 15 November 2025 and a charge sheet was served on 21 November 2025, after which a reply was filed but no inquiry report has been produced. The petitioner contended that he was unaware whether the suspension order had been communicated to the …

AJIT PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ajit Pratap Singh filed a writ petition seeking direction for an ad‑hoc service order to enable him to claim a pension. The respondents, the State of U.P. and others, contended that the matter should be dealt with by the concerned department. The Court, noting a prior coordinate‑bench decision in …

SHARMA MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Judicial Mandal, Prayagraj, to decide a pending suit (No. 2468 of 2022) filed under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the suit had been pending since 2022 …

MOHD. SHAHIDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohd Shahid, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking relief from criminal proceedings under Sections 420, 504 and 506 of the IPC and from two NBW orders dated 17‑03‑2023 and 23‑03‑2026. He contended that the NBW orders were improperly issued and requested a stay of …

DIGVIJAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Digvijay Singh, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 17684 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The respondent’s counsel, Ms. Vatsala, contended that the petitioner was not the aggrieved party and that the …

MAHAVEERversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Mahaveer filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal complaint (Case No. 17874 of 2023) filed by Om Prakash under IPC sections 323, 427, 452 and 506. The applicant alleged that the complaint was fabricated, that there was no …

NIRAJAN CHOWDHRY AND ANOTHERversusCHURAN CHOWDHRY AND 10 OTHERS

The petitioners, Nirajan Chowdhry and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Saidpur, Ghazipur, to decide the pending Original Suit No. 69/2000 against the respondents. The petition alleged that the suit was pending and required …

NITISH KUMAR DWIVEDIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the CrPC for Nitish Kumar Dwivedi, who was charged in a cyber‑crime case involving alleged money laundering and offences under Sections 318(4), 308(2), 61(2) of the IPC and Section 66‑D of the IT Act. The applicant argued that …

NIKKY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Nikky Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court, seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. Counsel for the applicant, Abhishek Pratap Singh, appeared before Justice Vivek Kumar Singh. During the …

SAMEER KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sameer Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to restore his possession of two land parcels (Gata No.306 and 308) in Naraura village, Kanpur Nagar. The petition alleged that the respondents had unlawfully …

KISHAN KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Kishan Kumar and others filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 07.02.2026 passed by the Commissioner, Aligarh Division. The petition alleged that the order was illegal and sought its setting aside. The respondent State of U.P. raised a …

AMIT AHUJAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Amit Ahuja, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Evidence Act seeking modification of an interim maintenance order dated 27‑05‑2025, which required him to pay Rs 20,000 per month to two claimants under Section 125 of the CrPC. The applicant argued that the order was …

UMASHANKAR SINGH AND 5 OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioners Umashankar Singh and others filed a public interest litigation before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioners sought to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, finding no objection, dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits …

RAVINDRA NATH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ravindra Nath Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking payment of his pension. He alleged that the respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, had failed to process his pension claim. The petition was heard by a learned Senior Advocate for the …

CHITRA SHARMAversusPRAVEEN KUMAR PALIWAL AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Chitra Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the High Court to direct the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Mathura to expedite Original Suit No. 791 of 2022 and to award costs. The petitioner later moved the Court to withdraw the writ petition. The learned Standing …

SHYAM SHARAN AND ANOTHERversusBARASATI AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shyam Sharan and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 10, Deoria, to decide a pending Restoration Application (4‑G) filed in Misc. Case No. 187 of 2011, which arose out of an earlier suit (Original Suit …

RAMESH CHANDRA KESARWANI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash demolition notices dated 13‑02‑2026 issued by the Executive Officer of Nagar Panchayat Mauaima and a mandamus directing the authorities not to proceed with demolition. The petitioners had already submitted their objections to the …

PRADEEP KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 13 OTHERS

Petitioner Pradeep Kumar filed a writ petition alleging that respondents 5 to 14 were violating an injunction order issued by the trial court in Suit No. 974 of 2025. The High Court examined whether a writ petition was the correct remedy to enforce the injunction. The Court held that the appropriate …

TASLEEMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Tasleem, was arrested in Crime No. 49 of 2026 under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act and has been in custody since 27 March 2026, claiming he was falsely implicated. He contended that he is already on bail in a …

ARUN KUMAR GAUTAMversusSMT. RUBI @ ARCHANA

Arun Kumar Gautam filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Family Court, Gautam Budh Nagar, to decide his matrimonial suit (Case No. 261 of 2025) filed under section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act and pending since 12‑Feb‑2025. The petitioner argued that the delay in the …

RAVI KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ravi Kumar was charged under IPC sections 452, 376, 506, 507 and IT Act section 67 for allegedly posting an indecent video of the victim on Facebook. He filed three successive bail applications, each asserting innocence, delay in FIR filing, and cooperation with the trial. The State opposed bail, …

SAMEERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sameer, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged assault with a sharp‑edged weapon. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, had no …

LALTI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Lalti Devi was charged under Section 302 IPC for allegedly strangling her five‑year‑old step‑daughter, based primarily on a confession to the complainant and without any eye‑witness. She has been in custody since January 2020 and the trial has progressed slowly, with only six of fourteen witnesses …

ADITYA KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSRI RAVENDRA PAL SINGH

The petitioners, Aditya Kumar and three others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Mr. Karunesh Narayan Tripathi, applied to withdraw the petition while seeking liberty to file a fresh petition. The learned Standing Counsel …

KARANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Karan, who was named in an FIR under several IPC offences and CrPC bail provisions. The applicant claimed false implication and lack of any overt act, asserting that the injured's statement identified another co-accused, Rahul, as the assailant. …

AJEETversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ajeet, who is accused in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended that he is …

SATYAPAL @ SANJAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant, Satyapal (also known as Sanjay), filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Evidence Act seeking modification of an interim maintenance order dated 20‑03‑2025 issued by the Family Court, Handras, under Section 125(3) of the CrPC. The applicant contended that the order …

RAKESH CHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Rakesh Chandra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner of Police, Prayagraj, to conduct a fair and impartial investigation into Crime No. 0040 of 2024 under Sections 279 and 338 of the B.N.S., 2023, and to arrest the accused. The …

KARAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Karan Singh, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 65(1), 332 of the IPC and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, highlighted a one‑day delay in filing the FIR, and noted the absence …

ASLAM @ SULTANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Aslam @ Sultan, was arrested in a murder case (Criminal Misc. No. 331 of 2025) despite not being named in the FIR; the only evidence against him was a mobile phone recovered after he pointed it out. No other incriminating material was found, and the specific assault allegation was …

SUSHMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sushma, who is accused in a 2021 case involving offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 506, 34 and the Banning Act sections 3‑6. The applicant claimed …

DIN DAYAL AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Din Dayal and four others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS and Section 482 of the CrPC seeking a stay of the criminal proceedings (Case No. 1693/2025) pending a mediation process. The court heard the petitioner's and the non‑governmental respondent's arguments and …

RANDHAWAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants, Randhawan and Dharm Singh, were arrested in connection with a case of assault involving six other accused, where two victims suffered multiple fractures. The applicants claimed false implication and argued they had no prior criminal record, while the State contended that they were …

AMARJEET AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

Amarjeet and three others filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to restrain the dumping of polluted water by the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents into local water bodies at Dharampur Kasayar. The petitioners alleged that the dumping caused environmental harm and …

DHANVEER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Dhanveer Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of his criminal complaint (No. 21 of 2023) involving alleged offences under Sections 420, 504 and 506 of the IPC, pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Sadabad. The …

BRAHM SINGH AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a direction that the District Magistrate award compensation at the prevailing market rate for a 1.3680‑hectare parcel of land that had been partially acquired for the Madhya Ganga Canal Project. They argued that while one portion was sold at a higher rate in a deed dated …

RAJAT @ SUMIT KUMARversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rajat @ Sumit Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the police investigation was complete and the report favored the petitioner. The …

JUNAIDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Junaid in a criminal case (Crime No. 348 of 2024) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 87, 70(2), 123 and POCSO Act sections 9(g) and 10. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed two months after the alleged …

MAYANK KUMAR FULWANIversusSMT KAJAL GEHANI @ YAKSHITA FULWANI

The petitioner, Mayank Kumar Fulwani, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Kanpur Nagar, to decide his pending divorce suit (case no. 1077 of 2025) filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, expeditiously. The petitioner …

LALIT KUMAR VERMAversusDIVISIONAL MANAGER LIC OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

Lalit Kumar Verma filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Divisional Manager of the Lic of India to consider his claim and grant an appointment on a compensatory basis. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, …

SD JAIN HOSTELversusTAX SUPERINTENDENT NAGAR NIGAM AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, S.D. Jain Hostel, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a directive that the Small Cause Court, Allahabad, promptly decide a pending civil suit (Misc. Case No.62 of 2011) arising from an assessment appeal under Section 472 of the Municipal Corporation Act, 1959. The …

RAJNEESH PATHAKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajneesh Pathak filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to decide a representation filed on 5 January 2026 within a stipulated period. The respondent's standing counsel did not object to the petition, provided the representation is decided in a …

JABIR ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jabir Ali, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the IPC, Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST Act. The applicant contended that the alleged victim, a 14‑year‑8‑month‑old girl, …

SHIV JI YADAV AND 3 OTHERSversusAFSAR AND 25 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a direction under Article 227 for the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Chandauli District to decide an application filed on 7 September 2024 in suit No. 381 of 2024 (Shiv Ji Yadav & others v. Afsar & others) within a fixed period. The petition claimed that the suit had been …

MEERA DEVIversusRAJDEV AND 13 OTHERS

The petitioner, Meera Devi, challenged an order that substituted the legal heirs of a deceased plaintiff in Original Suit No. 579 of 2006. The plaintiff died on 15 January 2025, and under Order 22 Rule 3 of the CPC, proceedings were abated until the heirs were brought on record. The trial court …

SUSHIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Sushil Kumar filed a writ petition seeking regularisation and equal work equal pay, requesting a writ of mandamus against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The Court examined the petition and found that the pleadings did not substantively support the relief claimed, rendering the …

GAURAV SINGHversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Gaurav Singh filed a writ petition seeking relief, presumably a transfer, but failed to produce a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the competent authority of his former college. The High Court examined the impugned order dated 15-04-2026 and found the reasons for rejecting the petition …

RAJKUMAR AND 32 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners, a group of existing street vendors, applied for vending shop allotments under Section 3 of the Street Vending Act, 2014 in Work Circle 1‑10, paid the required fees, but the Noida Development Authority failed to issue licenses or allotment letters. They filed a writ petition alleging …

VIKRAM AND 26 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, who are existing street vendors, applied for vending shop allotments under Section 3 of the Street Vending Act, 2014 in Work Circle 1‑10, but the Noida Development Authority failed to issue licenses or allotment letters despite completing surveys and selection. The petitioners filed …

SAMEERversusDR PAWAN KUMAR ARUN AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's judgment and order dated 18 September 2025 in Writ Petition No. 14061 of 2025. The order was served on the opposite party on 29 September …

NARENDRA NATH GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Narendra Nath Gupta, filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash a non-bailable warrant dated 18‑03‑2023 issued in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The warrant arose from Complaint Case No.19737 of 2021 (Vipin Agarwal v. Narendra Nath Gupta …

YOGENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Yogendra Singh filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act, alleging false implication in the recovery of 10 kg of ganja from a motorcycle. He contended that there was no independent witness, the …

BHAGAWANI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Bhagawani Devi, who was implicated in an FIR alleging a cross‑fight that resulted in injuries under Sections 325 and 307 IPC. The applicant claimed false implication, low flight risk, and …

MITHILESH KUMAR DASversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mithilesh Kumar Das, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B of the IPC. He claimed false implication in an FIR filed by the Mahant of an Ashram, …

ROHIT @ KEERAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Rohit @ Keera, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 173 of 2025 for alleged violations of Section 109(1) of the same Act and Sections 3, 35 and 27 of the Arms …

BACHCHERAM @ BACHCHELAL YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Bachcheram @ Bachchelal Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a lower court, to decide Revision No. 4181/2025, which has been pending since 2025 despite several fixed dates. The petitioner argued that the delay was unjustified and requested …

VIJAYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vijay, who is charged with murder (strangulation) under Sections 140(1), 61(2), 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the BNS. The FIR alleges that Vijay took the deceased in his motorcycle on 17 August 2025 and the body was discovered five days later, but no …

SMT. GENA DEVI @ GYANMATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Gena Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the revenue officer (respondent No.2) to decide a land restoration application filed in 2022 under Sections 34 and 209 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the …

KANPUR COLONISERS PRIVATE LIMITEDversusSTATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS

Kanpur Colonisers Private Limited filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Kanpur Development Authority to complete the demarcation of Arazi No. 481, a minzumla plot of which the petitioner claims 1,000 sq. metres. The Authority had already constituted a committee of six revenue officials …

DR NEELAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

Dr. Neelam Singh filed a writ petition seeking payment of his pension from the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The petitioner limited his relief to pension payment and indicated he would file a fresh representation within two weeks. The standing counsel for the State accepted that the …

SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH AND 55 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners, a group of allottee owners, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents, including the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority, to execute a sub‑lease deed in their favour and to decide a representation filed on 6 April 2026 within a stipulated time. The …

SONU MALIKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu Malik, who was charged under Sections 65(1), 137(2) of the Indian Penal Code, the 2023 provision, and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for allegedly abducting and raping the minor daughter of an informant. The prosecution alleged that …

RAJ KISHORversusRAM RAKSHA SINGH AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Raj Kishor, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) of Gorakhpur to decide Original Suit No.1166 of 2024 within a stipulated period. The petition solely requested an expeditious disposal of the pending suit. The Court observed that …

RITIK TYAGI @ GOLUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a charge under Section 109(1) of the same Act and Sections 3, 5, 25 and 28 of the Arms Act. The applicant, Ritik Tyagi, claimed innocence, stating that no police …

RAKESH KUMAR KATIYARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rakesh Kumar Katiyar, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS in a case stemming from a 2010 FIR alleging fraud in the issuance of licences for petrol, diesel and gas agencies. The FIR named 21 persons, with the primary alleged perpetrators being two directors, Dinesh …

DINESH YADAVversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Dinesh Yadav challenged the order dated 07.02.2026 that his passport was impounded by filing a writ petition. The respondents contended that the Passport Act, 1967 provides a specific statutory remedy – an appeal under Section 11 – against such an order. The Court held that because an …

TITUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Titu, was arrested in connection with a property‑related case (Crime No. 570 of 2025) alleging fraud under several IPC sections. He contended that the sale deed in question was validly executed in his favour in 2019 and that the subsequent sale to a third party, Neha Sharma, was a …

AMIT YADAV @ BUGGIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Amit Yadav under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with charges under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant asserted his innocence, …

KARTIK SEHGALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Kartik Sehgal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to set aside an interim maintenance order dated 16‑02‑2026 issued by the Family Court, Meerut, which required him to pay Rs 8,000 per month to the respondent. The applicant argued that the order …

VIJAYPALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Vijaypal in Crime No. 624 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 351(3), 352, 131, 340(2), 336(3), 338 and 318(4) of the BNS relating to a disputed agricultural land transaction. The …

RAKESH KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Rakesh Kumar and Jaiprakash, who were accused in a 2018 FIR for alleged forgery of income certificates to claim a government scheme. The applicants argued they were falsely implicated, had no …

HAKIKULLAHversusMOHD ILIYAS AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Hakikullah, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) in Khalilabad, Basti, to expedite the hearing and disposal of O.S. No. 54 of 2011 (Hakikullah v. Mohd. Iliyas & another). The petition solely requested that the lower court hear the suit …

AMAR GUPTA @ RAGHUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Amar Gupta was arrested for allegedly enticing away a 15‑year‑old girl and raping her, with charges under the IPC, POCSO Act and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution argued that the victim’s minority rendered any alleged consent ineffective and that the accused threatened her …

RISALDAR KHAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under the inherent powers of the court seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 2128 of 2011, which involved offences under Sections 323, 324, 504 and 427 IPC. Both parties admitted that they had reached a compromise, which was verified by the trial court on 6 July 2024 …

MAHENDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Mahendra Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a case (Crime No. 1012 of 2018) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471. He claimed false implication, stating that the FIR was based on a forged will and that he was …

SUKHDEVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The revisionist, Sukhdev, filed a criminal revision (No. 2634 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. At the hearing, counsel for the revisionist announced that he does not wish to pursue the revision and seeks to withdraw it. The learned Additional Government Advocate and the counsel for the …

MD WASIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Md. Wasi, who was arrested in connection with a fraud case involving alleged impersonation and fraudulent sale deeds under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the BNS and …

ANUJ GUPTAversusSMT. DIVI GUPTA

The petitioner, Anuj Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Kanpur Nagar, to decide the pending divorce suit (case no. 428 of 2023) under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner argued that the suit …

RAGHUVIR SINGH AND 6 OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Raghuvir Singh and six others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the petitioners was Mr. Rakesh Dubey, while the State of U.P. was represented by G.A. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition be …

RIZWANversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS

The petitioner Rizwan filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to decide Case No. 1542 of 2024, which is pending under Section 331(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Zila Adalat & Land Revenue Act, 1950. The petitioner alleged undue delay despite several dates being fixed. The Court, …

SATYAPRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Satyaprakash, accused in a case under Section 103(1) B.N.S. for allegedly assaulting the deceased with a danda and kulhadi. The FIR and witness statement named four persons but did not assign a specific role to the applicant, and no …

VINEETversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vineet, who was arrested on 22 January 2026 in connection with an extortion case (Crime No. 27 of 2026) under Sections 308(5) and 61(2) BNS. The applicant's only evidence was a confessional statement to police and the statement of a co‑accused; …

CHHATRAPALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a Section 482 CrPC application to quash Special Sessions Trial No.148 of 2019, which involved offences under IPC sections 420, 494, 354‑Gha, 366, 376 and 506, on the ground that the parties had reached a written compromise verified by the trial court. The State and the informant …

GOPAL PODDERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Gopal Podder, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case registered in 2013 under IPC sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 120‑B and 471 relating to alleged misappropriation of funds of Ramela Industries. The FIR alleged that the applicant was running the business and had diverted …

SACHINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sachin, accused under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 351(3) and 324(4) for allegedly assaulting an informant with wooden sticks. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, that the informant had a criminal history, and that the …

AKASH KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Akash Kumar Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the pending POCSO trial (Session Trial No. 456 of 2017) arising from alleged offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged …

HAJI ABDUL RASHEED ANSARI AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 75458 of 2023) arising from alleged offences under Sections 498‑A, 504, 506, 354 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that a compromise deed dated …

SHRI GAURAV SONDHIversusSMT POOJA RAJGADIYA

The applicant, Shri Gaurav Sondhi, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Smt Pooja Rajgadiya, repeatedly approached the High Court under Article 227 seeking directions to decide a pending 6-C temporary injunction application in Original Suit No. 287 of 2023. Two earlier writ …

ANIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Anil Kumar filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Man Bahadur Singh, later requested that the petition not be pressed. The court, noting the petitioner's request, dismissed the writ petition as not pressed. No substantive issues were …

SHISHIR KUMAR SRIVASTAVAversusCENTRAL BANK OF INDIA

The petitioner, Shishir Kumar Srivastava, filed a writ petition seeking a direction from the Central Bank of India to furnish the rent due for Locker No. 144 and to permit him to operate the locker with Key No. 70. The petitioner alleged that the bank had not released the locker rent and was …

MAJADOON NISHA AND 2 OTHERSversusSHOBHNATH AND 16 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.), Chandauli, to decide a pending application for interim injunction (Paper No 6C dated 23.11.2023) in Suit No. 556 of 2023 within a short period. The petitioners argued that the suit needed …

MUSKEENversusNOOR AHMAD AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Muskeen, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Rampur to decide the pending original suit No. 608 of 2025 against Noor Ahmad and others within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the suit was pending and required expeditious …

RAMCHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ramchandra, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) of Budaun to decide Original Suit No. 184 of 2019, which has been pending since 2019. The petitioner argued that the suit needed to be decided expeditiously and that continued delay …

RAMESH CHANDRAversusSMT. SHIVKANTI AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ramesh Chandra, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge Senior Division, District Kanpur Nagar, to decide Original Suit No. 2274/2013 (Shivkanti & others v. Rameshchandra & others) expeditiously. The petition claimed that the suit was pending …

AAKRITI TURAIHA (MINOR)versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, a minor represented through his father, challenged two orders dated 7 August 2025 and 22 January 2026 issued by the Tehsildar rejecting his applications for a caste certificate, alleging that the orders were unreasoned and contrary to a prior judgment in Mithlesh Kumar (Minor) v. …

GANDHI CHUAHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Gandhi Chauhan, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended …

ANKIT RANAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ankit Rana, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

ADITYAAGARWAL AND 22 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners (Adityaagarwal and 22 others) filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents, including the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority, to execute a sub‑lease deed in favour of the allottee(s) of Ajnara Homes and to decide a representation dated 15‑04‑2026 within …

SMT DARAKHSHAN BILGRAMIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, an Assistant Teacher, filed a writ petition seeking voluntary retirement from service under the Uttar Pradesh State Aided Higher Secondary School Teachers Death and Retirement Gratuity Rules, 1981. The petitioner submitted an application dated 26‑11‑2025 for voluntary retirement and …

PARMANAND AND 2 OTHERSversusADDITIONAL CITY MAGISTRATE -II AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Parmanand and others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional City Magistrate to decide a case (No. 240 of 1974) pending under Section 229-B of the Uttar Pradesh Zoning and Land Revenue Act. The petition alleged that despite multiple dates being fixed, the case …