Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 10601–10800

ANAND KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 13 OTHERS

Anand Kumar Mishra filed a PIL seeking writs of mandamus directing certain respondents to remove alleged illegal encroachments on specific village lands in Prayagraj district. The court noted that the petitioner has an alternative statutory remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, …

KESHRAJ AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to restrain the State authorities from dispossessing them of a portion of Plot No. 59 (recorded as Harijan Abadi) which was being treated as part of Plot No. 58 (Chakroad) in Azamgarh. They also asked that the order dated 18‑01‑2023, passed …

SMT ROLI SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt. Roli Shukla, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of a pending Section 125 maintenance case (Case No. 779 of 2022) before the Family Court, Allahabad. The trial court had earlier been directed, via a Section 482 …

M/S SHIPSTER IMPEX AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, M/s Shipster Impex and another, filed a writ petition challenging the requirement to make a pre‑deposit of 7.5% of the disputed customs duty/penalty before filing an appeal against an Order‑in‑Original dated 28‑Nov‑2025. They sought a direction that the appeal be allowed to be …

MOHD ABBASversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohd Abbas, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. He later sought to withdraw the petition, stating that essential parties had not been impleaded. The petitioner requested liberty to file a fresh petition with the necessary parties. The court considered the …

AMAN RATHAURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Aman Rathaur, who was arrested in connection with a rape allegation under Sections 64(1), 123 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant, the brother‑in‑law of the victim, claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was lodged more …

SMT. REENA SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt. Reena Singh was selected for the post of Anganwadi Karyakatri on 11 March 2025, but her domicile certificate was subsequently cancelled. She filed a writ petition (Writ C No.20322 of 2025) which was disposed on 25 July 2025. A subsequent letter dated 23 December 2025 from the …

ATUL KUMARversusASHISH KUMAR SINGH TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL SHAHGANJ

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 23 April 2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 11231 of 2025. The order had been served on 17 May 2025, but the opposite party had not complied. The court observed that a …

KAMLESH KUMARversusBOARD OF REVENUE, U.P. AT PRAYAGRAJ AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Kamlesh Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Board of Revenue, U.P., to decide Revision No. 2989 of 2025 under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that notices were issued before the revision was admitted, the lower court records have …

SANJAY SINGH PARIHARversusMRS. URMILA VYAS AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sanjay Singh Parihar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Prayagraj, to decide Original Suit No. 556 of 2019 pending before it. The petitioner argued that the suit was pending and required expeditious disposal. The …

SMT. SHELJA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Shelja and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to protect their peaceful matrimonial life from respondent No.4. The State informed the Court that an FIR had been lodged concerning the same matter and …

AKASH @ RAJ DHURIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Akash @ Raj Dhuriya, a 19‑year‑old accused under sections 137(2), 87, 65(2) of the IPC and sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for an alleged sexual offence involving a 16‑year‑old girl. The applicant contended that the relationship was consensual, …

SMT. GEETANJALI AND 16 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, a group of four industrial plot allottees, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to grant a six‑month relaxation for operating their industrial units without penalty, as extended in government orders during the COVID‑19 period. They also sought relaxation for …

SHIVBABUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Shivbabu filed a PIL seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to act against private parties for removing an alleged illegal encroachment on land recorded as public utility land in Prayagraj district. The petition argued that the encroachment violated …

AKEEL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners Akeel and Mohammad Shakil Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair and impartial investigation of case crime No. 0140 of 2026, arising from an FIR dated 1 April 2026. They argued that the investigation was biased and that …

KISHAN URF KRISHNA MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Kishan Urf Krishna Mishra filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner, Gorakhpur Division, to decide a stay application and an appeal filed under Section 6 of the U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970, and to stay the order of the District Magistrate that …

NARESH SONIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 19-04-2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 06-07-2024, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 680 of 2024 (State vs. Naresh Soni). The Court examined the FIR, the …

MULCHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mulchandra, filed a writ petition under Section 144 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Mandal Chitrakootdham to expedite the disposal of case No. RST/7867/2025, which had been pending since 2025. The petitioner …

NITIN SAINIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Nitin Saini, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Managing Director of Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd to consider his compassionate appointment claim under the U.P. Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974, after his father …

GIRISH DUBEY AND 2 OTHERSversusSANDHYA PATHAK

Petitioners Girish Dubey and two others filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the learned Civil Judge (SD) Gorakhpur to consider and decide Suit No. 910 of 2014 (Sandhya Pathak vs. Girish Dubey) within a stipulated time. The petition alleged that the suit was pending and …

SHAVA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide protection against alleged threats. The petition also requested liberty to file a fresh …

RAHULversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul, who was charged under IPC sections 191(2), 69, 352 and 351(3) for allegedly establishing a relationship on a false promise of marriage and later refusing to marry. The prosecution alleged deception, while the defence argued that the …

TAUFIQ AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, seven accused persons, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of the FIR alleging they assaulted Mursad Ali to deter his testimony in other cases. The FIR details the assault with sticks and resulting internal injuries, and a medico‑legal report confirms …

CHANDRAPAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Chandrapal and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑07‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 20‑12‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No. 25924 of 2025 arising from …

ARPIT AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Chargesheet No. 383/2025 and cognizance order) in a case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that the …

SUNIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Sunil Kumar was arrested in Crime No.57 of 2026 for alleged offences under Sections 69, 351(3) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code, accused of establishing a relationship with a 24‑year‑old woman on a false promise of marriage and later refusing to fulfil it. The prosecution alleged that the applicant …

PRAVESH TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Pravesh Tiwari, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking the expeditious disposal of his pending criminal case (Complaint Case No. 71289 of 2024) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which was filed in the Additional Chief Judicial …

RAJUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raju, accused in Criminal Case No. 328 of 2025 for allegedly beating a victim who later died. The FIR and victim's statement implicated all three accused, but the post‑mortem showed a single head injury with no weapon recovered and no specific …

SAVITAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code for an accused, Savita, who was charged under Section 108 of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. Act for allegedly abetting the suicide of her husband. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged six months …

SHAVEJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shavej, was implicated in an NDPS case (sections 8, 21 and 29) based solely on the statement of a co‑accused who was caught with 50 g of cannabis. Shavej, who has a criminal record of 13 cases (mostly robbery) but no prior NDPS offence, contended that he was falsely implicated and …

SUBHAN ALIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Subhan Ali under Section 438 of the CrPC in a case arising from alleged violations of Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, where a supply inspector seized 15 empty gas cylinders from his shop. The …

AJIT SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ajit Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.5, Meerut, to conclude the pending trial of Complaint No. 2984 of 2023 (Ajit Singh v. Usha) under Section 138 of the Negotiable …

KUNWARPALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kunwarpal, who was named in FIR No. 136 of 2025 under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. 2023. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR assigned a general firing role to him while the specific …

SUJAT ALIversusKANIJ FATIMA AND ANOTHER

Sujat Ali filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Haweli, Azamgarh to decide Original Suit No. 2370 of 2024 (Kanij Fatima v. Abdul Ahad and others) within the stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the suit was pending and required …

SOMLATA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

An application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Somlata and three others seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 02‑06‑2019 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 3394 of 2019) involving offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B and 506. The applicants …

SURESH KUMARversusPHOOL SINGH

The petitioner, Suresh Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kanpur Dehat, to decide the pending Original Suit No.383 of 2016 against Phool Singh without any adjournments and within a specified period. The petitioner’s counsel, Uttam …

ASHISH KUMAR CHATURVEDI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in Case No. 9466 of 2023, where they were charged under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. They contended that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club Ltd. v. State of …

M/S THE DELHI FLOUR MILLS COMPANY LIMITEDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The Delhi Flour Mills Co. Ltd. filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Collector of Gautam Budh Nagar not to take any coercive actions, such as recovery proceedings or attachment of assets, under an order dated 11‑09‑2025. The petition was filed while an appeal under Section …

SARFARAZ AHMADversusAADHAR HOUSING FINANCE LTD AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a certiorari to quash an auction notice dated 08.06.2022 issued by Aadhar Housing Finance Ltd. under the SARFAESI Act. The respondents argued that the High Court lacks jurisdiction to interfere in the enforcement …

SHAMA PARVEENversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner applied for a fresh passport, which remained pending since 23 September 2025 because the Regional Passport Officer (RPO) in Bareilly cited a pending criminal case against him. The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the RPO to decide the application promptly. The Court …

KAUSHAL KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Kaushal Kumar applied for a passport but the Regional Passport Officer in Lucknow refused to issue it, citing a pending criminal case against him. He filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to compel the officer to obtain the required report and reissue the passport. The Court referred to …

ARUN KUMAR TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Arun Kumar Tripathi, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking payment of arrears of salary from the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The petitioner alleged that his salary dues remained unpaid and approached the court for relief. The court examined …

DHARMVEERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dharmveer, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three other respondents. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner moved that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, seeking liberty to approach the …

SAI DEENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

Sai Deen filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondents No.2‑4 to remove an illegal encroachment of a house built by respondents No.6‑9 on Gata No.429, and to decide pending representations. The petitioner alleged that an order under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 dated …

PREM PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Prem Pal Singh, filed a writ petition challenging the non‑payment of an amount awarded by the Labour Court on 24 April 2022 in Adjudication Case No. 184 of 2007. The High Court examined whether it could intervene to enforce the award. The Court observed that the petitioner has an …

HAPPU KHAversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Happu Kha filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 17694 of 2026) challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The State's standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner’s grievance was against private individuals (respondents 4 and 5) and …

SMT MEENAversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt Meena, filed a writ petition seeking direction for her appointment on compassionate grounds, which was pending before the authorities without any decision. The petitioners argued that the delay violated their right to a timely appointment. The court examined the pending status …

MADHAV @ ARJUN MINOR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants, minors, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A‑1 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking to quash the cognizance and proceedings of a Sessions case involving offences under the Indian Penal Code and the SC/ST Act. They did not …

SMT. ANCHAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel later informed the court that they did not wish to pursue the petition. The petitioner sought a dismissal of the writ as not pressed, with liberty to file a fresh petition if desired. The court considered the request …

SMT. NEETU AGARWALversusM/S SHRI SAI DIESEL AND GENERATORS AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Neetu Agarwal, filed a writ petition under Section 21(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Urban Premises Tenancy Act, 2021, seeking a direction to the Rent Authority (respondent No.3) to decide her tenancy case (Case No. 1600 of 2025) expeditiously. The petitioner argued that …

KAILASH AND ANOTHERversusSMT. SUSHAMA SINGH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Kailash and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Varanasi, to decide their Original Suit No. 444 of 2025 and the accompanying temporary injunction application within a stipulated period. The petition alleged that …

SHARIF KHAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Section 331(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Prayagraj Division to decide a pending appeal (Case No. 2409 of 2024) that has been delayed since 2024. The …

M/S PURNIMA ENTERPRISESversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

M/S Purnima Enterprises filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 23‑02‑2025 issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017. The State of Uttar Pradesh contended that the petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy of filing an appeal. The petitioners …

MAHESH CHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mahesh Chandra, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an interim maintenance order dated 11 May 2023 and a subsequent arrest warrant dated 18 February 2026. The maintenance order, issued under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from …

BABA IRON SCRAP COMPANYversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST AND 2 OTHERS

Baba Iron Scrap Company challenged an adjudication order dated 31‑10‑2025 passed under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 for the tax period June 2021 to March 2022. The revenue argued that the petitioner had an efficacious statutory remedy of appeal, while the petitioner claimed that severe personal …

DHIRENDRA PRATAP CHAURASIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking expeditious disposal of a pending complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Case No. 8296 of 2022) before the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Gorakhpur. The applicant argued that the …

DHIRENDRA PRATAP CHAURASIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Dhirendra Pratap Chaurasiya, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expedited decision in a pending complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Case No. 14462 of 2022) before the Civil Judge (Senior Division‑I), Gorakhpur. …

RAJENDRA KUMAR DUBEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Rajendra Kumar Dubey and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner & Director of Industry U.P., Anubhag‑3 (A) Kanpur to pay 7% interest on delayed pension arrears of Rs.18,33,799 and to decide their grievance promptly. The State respondents argued that …

PRAMOD KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondent to consider and decide his transfer application dated 17 May 2025 under Rule 5(iii) of the Transfer Policy 2025-26. The respondent contended that the 2025-26 transfer policy had expired and a new policy for 2026-27 was …

ARVIND PANDEY @ GOLU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants, Arvind Pandey and another, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A‑1 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire proceedings of a Special Sessions case. They did not contest the …

RAJESH KUMARversusSRI VIKAS CHANDRA AND ANOTHER

Rajesh Kumar filed a contempt application against Sri Vikas Chandra and another for allegedly willfully disobeying the High Court's order dated 6‑Feb‑2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 3311 of 2026. The order was served on 19‑Feb‑2026, but the opposite parties had not complied. The Court observed …

M.A. ZAIDIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner M.A. Zaidi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner & Director of Industry U.P., Anubhag‑3 (A) Kanpur (respondent No.3) to pay 7% interest on delayed pension arrears of Rs.20,02,643 and to decide his grievance promptly. The petitioner alleged that his claim for …

SHANTANU KUMAR BISWAS AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Shantanu Kumar Biswas and two others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner & Director of Industry U.P., Anubhag‑3 (A) Kanpur to pay 7% interest on delayed pension arrears of Rs.19,79,152 and to decide their grievance promptly. The petitioners claimed that …

VISHAL VARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, a holder of a valid arms licence for a revolver since 2011, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to decide his renewal application filed on 16‑10‑2025. The licensing authority had requested a police character report, which disclosed three serious …

SHIVA TYAGIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shiva Tyagi was charged with murdering his aunt under Section 103(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. The applicant argued that there were no reliable eyewitnesses and that his alleged confession to police was not properly recorded, seeking bail after being in custody since …

JAGDISH ALIAS SETHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 filed by Jagdish alias Sethi, who alleged false implication in an FIR dated 17‑08‑2001 involving offences under IPC Sections 147, 324, 353, 504, 224, 225 and 307. The applicant had not been served with any summons, …

VIVEK AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of a charge sheet and summons in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the dispute by a …

SURAJ MAHATOversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Suraj Mahato filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ghazipur, despite being on bail at the time. He contended that the warrant was issued without any prior summons or bailable warrant and that the …

SHAKEEL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal revision challenging an order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baghpat, dated 25 March 2026, which directed the police to lodge an FIR under Section 173(4) read with Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioners argued that the order was illegal and …

POONAM DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Poonam Devi, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court No.2 to render a final decision in a pending maintenance proceeding (Case No. 148 of 2023) under Section 125 CrPC. The applicant …

PUSHPA RAIversusGIRISH CHANDRA RAI AND 4 OTHERS

Pushpa Rai filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Azamgarh to decide Original Suit No. 1031 of 2016 (Girish Chandra Rai v. Laxmi Kant Rai & others) within a specified period. The petitioner argued that the suit had been pending for a long …

CHHATRAPAL SINGHversusRANJEET SINGH

The petitioner, Chhatrapal Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) II, Bareilly, to decide a 6‑C application filed under Order 39 Rule‑1 & 2 of the CPC in Original Suit No. 392 of 2023, and to restrain the respondent from …

AMRENDRA KUMAR JAISWALversusUNION BANK OF INDIA

Petitioner Amrendra Kumar Jaiswal filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing Union Bank of India to return possession of secured assets, claiming he had repaid all dues. The bank contended that the petitioner had already filed a petition under Section 17 of the SARFAESI …

RAVIKANT YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Ravikant Yadav filed a habeas corpus petition alleging illegal arrest and remand, contending that the arrest memo lacked any valid ground and the remand order was issued on a printed proforma without application of mind. The petition relied on prior judgments, including Mihir Rajesh v. …

PINTUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Pintu, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act and Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant issued against him in a 2004 case (State vs. Sunil & Another) involving offences under IPC Sections 498 and 376 and Section 3(1) of …

GYAN SINGH AND 8 OTHERSversusSHRI ARUN KUMAR

The applicants filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 9 March 2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 28267 of 2025. The order had been served on 18 March 2026, but the opposite party had not complied. The court found a prima …

RAM NARESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, an advocate, filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction that the State transfer employees working under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) from one block to another as per state orders. The court noted that the petitioner offered no …

DAYANANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondent authority to consider and decide applications filed on 06.01.2022 and 24.06.2022 for implementing an order dated 16.11.2021 passed under Section 38(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that …

ANAND PALversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

Anand Pal filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India and the Regional Passport Officer, Lucknow, to issue a fresh passport despite pending criminal cases against him. The petitioner alleged that the passport officer had neither issued the passport nor provided any order, …

ROBINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Robin, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain aspects of the investigation. During the proceedings, the State counsel informed the Court that additional, more serious charges had been added to the case. The petitioner …

SHIVANI AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shivani and another, filed a writ petition under Section 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their peaceful matrimonial life from a third party. The State informed the Court that an FIR had already been lodged concerning the matter and …

SHREYA VIDYARTHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Shreya Vidyarthi, appealed to the Allahabad High Court against a conviction and fine imposed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the Additional Court II, Kanpur Nagar. Both parties agreed that the appeal should have been filed before the Sessions Court, not the High …

MEERA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Meera Devi, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, seeking liberty to file a fresh petition. The respondents did not oppose this request. The Court, after noting …

KAKO @ KAFIAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Kako @ Kafia in Criminal Case No. 149 of 2025 under Sections 8 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The applicant contended that she was falsely implicated, was not arrested on the spot, and no narcotic …

RAGHVENDRA SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Raghvendra Shukla filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the proceedings in Case No. 391 of 2025, which were based on a charge sheet invoking Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 (criminal …

JAGDISH PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jagdish Prasad, was appointed as a Registration Clerk in 1991 and superannuated on 30 June 2023. He claims entitlement to the Second and Third A.C.P. positions after completing 24 and 26 years of service respectively, and submitted a representation on 24 April 2026 seeking promotion, …

ANURADHA CHAUHANversusSHAKUN AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of District Mirzapur to decide Original Suit No. 235 of 2021 (Balmukund vs Shakun and others) expeditiously. The High Court noted that the suit was already pending and that keeping the …

SUNIL KUMAR DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Sunil Kumar Dubey, a retired Sub‑Inspector, challenged an order dated 21‑09‑2025 that retroactively revised his salary from March 2005 and sought recovery of the excess amount paid. He argued that no notice or hearing was given, that the recovery was sought after a 20‑year lapse, and that there was …

OM JIversusAJAY ANAND VERMA AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite parties willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 27 January 2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 908 of 2026. The order had been served on 28 January 2026 but remained unimplemented. The court observed that a prima facie …

MANISH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Manish Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate to decide his application and the police station to act against persons obstructing construction of his house. He alleged that private individuals had trespassed and forcibly removed …

SMT. POOJA YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Pooja Yadav and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide protection for their life and liberty. The petition also requested …

ADITYA SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner applied for renewal of his passport, but the Regional Passport Officer in Lucknow refused to issue it on the ground of a pending criminal case against him. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to issue the passport. The Court referred to …

SACHINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sachin, accused in a case under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 85, 80(2) of the IPC, and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging the death of his wife was a suicide. The applicant argued that the deceased was short‑tempered, that …

NAZRIN @ NAZREEN BANO AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners, Nazrin @ Nazreen Bano and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their peaceful matrimonial life from alleged harassment by respondents No.4 to 7. The State informed the Court that an FIR had already …

MAITRI GROVERversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (C.B.I.) AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Maitri Grover, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to decide a departmental appeal dated 5 February 2026 within a fixed time and after a hearing. The petition originally sought to quash an order dated 28 January …

ANISversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Anis, was arrested in connection with the murder of the son of the first informant, although his name was not mentioned in the FIR. The prosecution’s case rests on a statement recorded under Section 180 and the recovery of a 'danda' that bore no bloodstains. The applicant argued that …

KARTIKEY RAOversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Kartikey Rao applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.12 of 2026) involving charges under Sections 137(2), 65(1)M, 87 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act, 2012. The FIR was lodged about one and a half months after the alleged incident. The victim, who had stayed voluntarily at …

BHOLANATH JAISWAL AND ANOTHERversusCHIEF BRANCH MANAGER AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, owners of a property in Kachnar, Varanasi, sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondent bank, which was occupying part of the property as a branch, to vacate the premises and to decide their representation dated 09.01.2026. The petitioners argued that the bank was a tenant and …

SURESH CHANDRAversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Suresh Chandra, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 17780 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petition was argued before the Court by counsel Mahipal Singh and Somveer on behalf of the …

MOTI LAL SAROJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 16 OTHERS

The petitioner, Moti Lal Saroj, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division)/FTC, Varanasi, to decide the Interim Injunction Application 6‑C in Civil Suit No. 740 of 2025 within a reasonable time. The petition alleged that the suit was pending and …

SIDDHARTHA MAHESHWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Siddhartha Maheshwari, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking an expeditious disposal of a pending criminal complaint (Case No. 75 of 2017) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which was at the stage of recording evidence. The …

ABHAY SONKARversusSMT SHWETA

Petitioner Abhay Sonkar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Kanpur, to decide the pending matrimonial suit (Case No.1361 of 2022) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner argued that the suit should be …

NAUSHADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Naushad, who is charged under Sections 307 and 411 of the IPC and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at police, although no police officer was injured and the applicant himself was hurt. Naushad, who has 19 prior …

BITTU KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bittu Kumar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the B.N.S., 2023. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting no abduction or sexual assault occurred and that the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and …

OM JIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to summon a 1974-75 patta allotment record for Village Umari and to restrain respondents Nos. 4 to 7 from illegal construction on his land (Gata No. 2337, 150 sq. yd.) in Auraiya. The petition essentially involved a …

RAJU CHAUHAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Raju Chauhan and two others, who alleged false implication in an FIR alleging assault over a land dispute. The applicants argued they had no criminal record, were not arrested, and feared …

SMT. RADHA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Radha and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to protect their peaceful matrimonial life from a fourth respondent. The State counsel informed the court that an FIR had already been lodged concerning …

AMBIKA PRASADversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the State of U.P. and other respondents to remove illegal encroachments on Gata No. 199, 0.2000 hectares of land, based on earlier orders under Section 67(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued …

ASIF @ ASIVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Asif @ Asiv in a criminal case (Crime No.10 of 2026) involving alleged sexual assault of a 15‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed false implication, citing contradictory victim statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS, with the …

HDFC BANK LTD. (ERSTWHILE HDFC LTD.)versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

HDFC Bank Ltd. filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State respondent (No.3) to pass an order in SARFAESI proceedings (Case No. 5136/2021) and to hand over physical possession of the secured asset. The petition relied on the Supreme Court’s earlier decision in …

M/S ELENTECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITEDversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

The High Court examined a writ petition filed by Elentech India Private Limited challenging the Uttar Pradesh revenue department’s computation of interest on VAT demands for assessment years 2012‑13 to 2015‑16, issued under section 28 of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008. The petitioner asserted that it had …

ANKIT KOHLIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ankit Kohli filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in Criminal Case No. 22070 of 2025 (State vs. Mukesh Kohli). The applicant contended that the charge‑sheet improperly included both sections 318(4) and 316(2) BNS, which correspond to IPC …

VIJAY SHANKAR YADAVversusSHRI ANUPAM MISHRA

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 28 January 2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 40218 of 2025. The order had been served on 31 January 2026, but the opposite party had not complied. The court observed that …

MOHAMMAD ARSHADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 21‑12‑2023 in a case where the accused was charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended, relying on the Supreme Court’s …

MOHAMMAD VASIFversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

A writ petition (Writ C No. 17615 of 2026) was filed by Mohammad Vasif before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Dilnawaz Ahmad Khan, informed the Court that he no longer wished to pursue the petition and requested its withdrawal. The respondents, represented by A.S.G.I., Ajay …

KAMINI MISHRAversusBANK OF BARODA EARLIER DENA BANK AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a widow of a bank employee who died in service, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing Bank of Baroda (formerly Dena Bank) to decide her applications for ex‑gratia payment and compassionate appointment and to release the amount with interest. The bank contended that the …

SAPNA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners Sapna and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their peaceful matrimonial life from alleged interference by respondent No.5. The State counsel informed the Court that an FIR had already been lodged …

RAMESH CHANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ramesh Chand, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and related authorities to regularize his appointment as a Fourth Class Employee under the Government Orders of 2016 and 2021 and to pay him salary and benefits. He also requested the court to …

MANORAMA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Manorama Devi, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court No. II, Varanasi, to decide a pending Section 125 CrPC case (Case No. 483 of 2023) within a specific time frame. The trial court …

SHAHNAZ FATIMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shahnaz Fatima, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an order directing the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court No. 5, Allahabad, to expedite the pending Section 125 case (Shahnaz Fatima v. Akhtar Husain) which had been delayed for a …

KANTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Officer, Second, Sadar, District Azamgarh to decide a pending case (No. 10509 of 2022) under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the case remained …

KUNNU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kunnu Yadav, who was arrested in connection with a case under several IPC sections, a provision of the B.N.S.S., and sections of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, an 18‑year‑old woman, had …

SONIYA VANKHEDE AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Soniya Vankhede and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide protection. The petitioners admitted that they had married without …

PRAMOD YADAVversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner applied for a passport but the Regional Passport Officer in Lucknow did not issue it, citing a pending criminal case against him. The petitioner sought a mandamus directing the respondents to issue the passport and to decide the application within a fixed period. The Court referred to …

MOHAMMAD AKARAMversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner applied for renewal of his passport, but the Regional Passport Officer in Lucknow refused to issue it, citing a pending criminal case against him. The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the officer to re‑issue the passport. The Court referred to its earlier judgment in …

SHREYASH TRIPATHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court and later informed the court that they did not wish to pursue the petition. They requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to file a fresh petition if desired. The court accepted the request and dismissed …

MULAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mula, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summons and criminal proceedings in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case where he allegedly issued a Rs.4 lakh cheque that was dishonoured due to a mismatched thumb impression. The magistrate had …

MAHENDRA KUMAR MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Mahendra Kumar Maurya, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of Special Session Trial No. 272 of 2019, which involves offences under Sections 376, 504, 506, 120B of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The case, …

RAHUL JINDAL @ RAHUL AGARWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rahul Jindal, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summons and criminal proceedings in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed by M/s Mahashay Ji and Sons. He contended that the magistrate had taken cognizance without …

NEHA CHAUHANversusSRI ABHISHEK RAJPOOT

The applicant, Neha Chauhan, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any …

RAMPAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in State v. Rampal (Case No. 635 of 2024) which alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. They contended that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) cannot …

RASHIDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rashid, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashing of the FIR alleging his involvement in a violent assault that resulted in injuries to four persons and the death of Abdul Rauf. The assault involved sticks and sharp-edged weapons, causing abrasions, contusions, incised …

PARMSHILA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 7784 of 2025) arising under the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. During the hearing, the …

VIJAY AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Vijay and six others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue) of Gorakhpur to decide a pending recall/restoration application and a stay application in case No.9001/2025, filed under Section 38(2) of the Uttar Pradesh …

SEEMENDRA BHATNAGARversusSHYAM SRIVASTAVA

The petitioner, Seemendra Bhatnagar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Kanpur Nagar to decide Original Suit No. 920/2024 (Shyam Srivastava v. Seemendra Bhatnagar and others) within a specific period. The petition solely requested expeditious …

RAMESH MISHRA AND 48 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, a group of 49 employees including Ramesh Mishra, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to grant them the revised grade pay of Rs. 4200 for IInd ACP and Rs. 4600 for IIIrd ACP as per a government order, …

CHATRAPALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Chatrapal in a case involving alleged robbery and murder offences (Sections 303(2), 317(2), 3(5) IPC). The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated due to enmity with …

PRASHANT SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Prashant Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the summoning order and charge sheet in a criminal case where he was charged under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant argued that, based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club …

SHYAM BABU PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Shyam Babu Pandey filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order passed by the respondents, the State of U.P. and four others. The petitioner, through Senior Advocate Ashok Khare and V.D. Shukla, relied on judgments of coordinate benches of the same court that allegedly …

DR. RAJESH PRATAP SINGHversusSHRI VINAY KUMAR PATHAK AND ANOTHER

Dr. Rajesh Pratap Singh filed a contempt application against Shri Vinay Kumar Pathak and another for allegedly refusing to comply with the High Court's order dated 25‑02‑2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 2785 of 2026. The order had been served on 28‑03‑2026, but the opposite parties had not …

PINKIversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Pinki, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India to consider her application for a compassionate appointment under the Central Government scheme, following the death of her father in 2000. Her mother had earlier applied for the same appointment in 2011, …

SHRI SHARAD SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sharad Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a domestic‑violence complaint (case no. 3095 of 2025) filed by his wife under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. He alleged the complaint was false, filed with malice, and …

LAUKUSHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Laukush applied for bail in a case where he was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the IPC, and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a 14‑year‑old girl, stealing Rs 50,000 and ornaments, and being involved in a pregnancy that was later terminated. The prosecution argued …

WASIMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Wasim, who was in custody since 8 April 2026 for an alleged offence under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that only a single base case was shown in the gang …

AKASH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Akash Yadav, who was arrested under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act in Crime No. 77 of 2026. The applicant claimed false implication and pointed to the bail granted to similarly …

PUSPA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Puspa Devi filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition was opposed by the respondents. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be dismissed on the ground that it was not pressed at this stage. The …

RIFAQAT ALI KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Rifaqat Ali Khan filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash the summons dated 24‑02‑2025 and the entire proceedings of a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed by the State. He contended that the dispute was essentially a monetary …

SANTOSH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Santosh Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondent No.3 to comply with an order dated 19‑03‑26. The petition arose out of a dispute with a private respondent. The State’s standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that the writ petition was not maintainable because it …

M/S K.G.N. ENTERPRISESversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, M/s K.G.N. Enterprises, filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash the summoning order dated 07‑04‑2021 and the entire criminal proceeding under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act arising from Complaint No. 39787/2021. The applicant alleged malicious prosecution, …

SHASHANK SHARMA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 7037 of 2019, which involved offences under Sections 498‑A, 452, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that a compromise had been reached on …

ANKIT KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

Ankit Kumar applied for a passport which the Regional Passport Office, Lucknow, refused on the ground of a pending criminal case against him. He filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to issue the passport. The Court referred to its earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar …

JAGATRAJversusRAMA SHANKAR AND 4 OTHERS

The father of the applicant filed a writ petition seeking a status‑quo order on 23 May 2003 to restrain construction on a disputed property. The opposite parties allegedly proceeded with construction, prompting a contempt application that also named the District Inspector of Schools, Lalitpur as a …

VIKAS AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case (Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 D.P. Act) on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the dispute by a compromise dated 06‑04‑2026. The …

ASHOK KUMAR VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Ashok Kumar Verma challenged a transfer order dated 21‑04‑2026 that moved him from Vikas Khand Chaubepur to Vikas Khand Kakawan under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). He argued that the order was illegal because it conflicted with a Government Order dated …

GULAB YADAVversusANISH KUMAR SINGH

The applicant, Gulab Yadav, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Anish Kumar Singh, willfully disobeyed the High Court's judgment and order dated 18 January 2024 in PIL No. 2637 of 2023. The order had been served to the opposite party on 29 October 2024, but compliance had …

SUBHPREETversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Subhpreet filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance‑summoning order dated 30 July 2022 in a case where he was charged under IPC Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating). The applicant argued that, according to the Supreme …

SMT JAGANI DEVI AND 6 OTHERSversusHARI SINGH YADAV AND 17 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court‑4, Ghazipur, to decide Original Suit No.335 of 2002 (Smt. Jagani Devi and others v. Hari Singh Yadav and others) within a reasonable time. The High Court noted that the …

SATYAVEER SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Satyaveer Sharma, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to consider and decide his claim for salary payment and reinstatement filed on 21-11-2025. He alleged that despite repeated representations, his claim remained undecided. The …

SMT. MEHAR JAHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Mehar Jahan and another, filed a writ petition under Section 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to protect their peaceful matrimonial life from respondent No.4. The State counsel informed the court that an FIR had already been lodged …

VINOD KUMAR MISHRAversusDINESH CHANDRA PATHAK AND 3 OTHERS

Vinod Kumar Mishra, the complainant in a disciplinary proceeding against Dinesh Chandra Pathak, filed an application for leave to appeal a single judge's order that the suspension order remain in abeyance pending the enquiry. The High Court examined whether a complainant, who is not a co‑employee of …

TALAT PARVEENversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Talat Parveen, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Regional Passport Officer, Bareilly, to renew her passport, which had expired on 29 July 2019. The officer had refused renewal on the ground that a criminal case against the petitioner was pending. The Court …

CHANDRAJEET MANGAL PRAJAPATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the Tehsildar of Saidpur, Ghazipur to decide a pending revenue case (Case No. T202014290402787) concerning encroachment on a 1.0090 hectare plot recorded as land of Tal. The case, filed under Section 67(1) of the Uttar Pradesh …

MOHAMMAD BABAR KHANversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Mohammad Babar Khan applied for renewal of passport No. U5477414 for a foreign religious tour, but the Regional Passport Officer, Bareilly, refused to process the application citing pendency of a criminal case against him. The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the officer to …

ROHITAS KUMAR SINGHversusMANJU SINGH AND 12 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rohitas Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Eastern, Ballia, to decide Application No.6C2 (6Ga2) in Original Suit No.510/2024 against Manju Singh and others within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the pending …

M/S RAJ KUMAR AND SONS AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Raj Kumar and Sons, were awarded contracts for six irrigation sites in 2023-24, three under the Superintending Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Meerut and three under the Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Saharanpur. They completed all works on time but claim that …

MOHAMMAD NABI RASOOL ANSARIversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner applied for renewal of his passport (ARN No. 24-2001981466) but the application was pending due to a criminal case against him. He filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the passport authorities to process the renewal within a short time. The petitioner did not contest the …

ANILversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking certiorari to quash an order dated 16/05/2025 passed by the Tehsildar/Assistant Collector under section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged that the order was illegal and sought its setting aside. The …

BHULLANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Bhullan, filed Writ Petition No. 17720 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court challenging an order dated 16 May 2025 issued by the Tehsildar/Assistant Collector (2nd) (Judicial) of Tehsil Loni, District Ghaziabad, under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner …

ASHOK KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Basic Education Officer, Mainpuri, to consider his claim for fixation as Officiating Headmaster from 01‑07‑2011 to his retirement on 30‑06‑2013 and to award the corresponding retiral dues and pension. The …

ARUN KUMAR DWIVEDIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Arun Kumar Dwivedi, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Basic Education Officer, Mainpuri, to consider his claim for fixation as Officiating Headmaster from 30‑06‑2012 until his retirement on 31‑03‑2024 and to award the corresponding retiral dues and pension. He …

SURENDRA NATH SRIVASTAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Surendra Nath Srivastav, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Basic Education Officer, Mainpuri, to consider his claim for fixation as Officiating Headmaster from 01‑07‑2013 to his retirement on 31‑03‑2018 and to award the corresponding retiral dues and pension. …

ASHISH KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ashish Kumar Yadav, challenged an order dated 17 January 2026 issued by the Managing Director of Kanpur Electricity Supply Company Limited that imposed a minor disciplinary punishment by withholding two annual increments. The respondent argued that the petition was not maintainable …

SMT. SUDHA VASHISHTHversusSMT. SARITA JHA

The petitioner, Smt. Sudha Vashishth, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Etah to decide Civil Suit No. 296 of 2021 against Smt. Sarita Jha within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the suit was pending and required …

AMIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Amit Kumar challenged an order dated 11-12-2025 issued by the Managing Director of Kanpur Electricity Supply Company Limited that imposed a minor punishment by withholding five annual increments. The respondent argued that the petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy under the …

CHANDRASHEKHAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Chandrashekhar and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the continuation of criminal proceedings against them. The State had already concluded the investigation, filed a charge sheet, and taken cognizance of the case. The petitioners did not dispute …

SMT. RAJRANI DEVIversusMOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL (NORTH) AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Smt. Rajrani Devi filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (North), Prayagraj to decide her pending application dated 13 September 2025 (Misc. Case No. 164 of 2025) within a fixed time and to release the remaining 40% amount of Rs.5,94,000. …

WAKEEL AHMADversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner applied for re‑issuance of his passport, but the Regional Passport Officer in Bareilly declined to process the application on the ground that a criminal case against him was pending. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the passport authorities to process …

RAHUL CHHABRA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Rahul Chhabra and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 66500 of 2024) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, alleging that the parties had amicably settled the dispute via a compromise …

AIJAZ AHAMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Aijaz Ahamad, filed a transfer application seeking to move a Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance case (Case No.1188 of 2022) from the Family Court in Aligarh to another district court, alleging threat to his safety. He argued that his participation via video conferencing would serve the …

MO IFRAHIMversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, a retired Urdu Translator of the Uttar Pradesh Police classified as a Group C (Class III) employee, challenged a recovery order dated 02‑04‑2024 that deducted Rs.4,46,619 from his post‑retirement dues on the ground of alleged excess salary fixation. The High Court examined the …

MONU @ MANMOHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Monu @ Manmohan, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 115 of 2026) involving alleged assault and homicide. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR was lodged belatedly, the post‑mortem indicated prior medical …

FURQUAN ALIversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Furqan Ali, a retired Urdu Translator of the Uttar Pradesh Police classified as a Group C (Class III) employee, challenged an order dated 18.03.2025 that recovered Rs.1,87,014 from his salary and post‑retirement dues on the ground of alleged excess payment due to an erroneous …

RAM SAKHIversusARVIND AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Sakhi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) of Paschimi, Ballia to decide the pending suit (Case No.1022/2021) against the respondents expeditiously and without unnecessary adjournments. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the …

MERAJUL HASAN AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Merajul Hasan and others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to consider a representation dated 06-04-2026 and pass a reasoned order after hearing. The petitioner alleged that no decision had been taken on the representation. The Court examined the petition …

LATURI SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Laturi Singh challenged an order dated 20.01.2026 passed by the Up‑Ziladhikari (Judicial) of Tehsil‑Patiyali under Section 38(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, alleging it was issued ex‑parte without giving him an opportunity to be heard. The respondents contended that the proviso to …

SHRADDHA SHUKLAversusADITYA KUMAR TIWARI

The applicant, Shraddha Shukla, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit to another court. After making partial submissions, the applicant's counsel, Najakat Ali, requested withdrawal of the transfer application and asked for liberty to file a fresh …

SUBHASH PATELversusSHAMBHU NATH & 12 OTHERS

The petitioner, Subhash Patel, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Sharki), Allahabad, to decide Suit No. 1435 of 2005 (Ram Lakhan vs. Shambhu Nath and Others) within a fixed time. The petition solely requested an expeditious disposal of the pending suit. …

SMT.SHIPRA VERMAversusRISHABH SINGH

The applicant, Smt. Shipra Verma, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 958 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The respondent, Rishabh Singh, was represented by counsel. …

ANKUR SHUKLA @ ANKUSH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ankur Shukla and others, filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge to pass a reasoned order on a stay application pending in Criminal Revision No. 443 of 2025 and to keep the execution of an order dated 13‑08‑2025, issued under Section 133 …

SHIVANI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Shivani and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others not to interfere with their marital life and to provide protection. Their counsel later expressed that they did not wish to pursue the present petition and sought liberty …