Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 10801–11000
The applicant, Manti Devi, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Parikshit Khatana, willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 25 September 2025 in Writ Petition No. 29446 of 2025. The order was served on the opposite party on 21 …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 25 September 2025 in Writ Petition No. 29387 of 2025. The court noted that a certified copy of the order had been served on 21 January 2026 …
The applicant, Ashok Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Judicial Magistrate, Second, Bhadohi‑Gyanpur to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 6649 of 2021) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint had been …
The applicants filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 25 September 2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 29406 of 2025. The order was personally served on the opposite party on 21 …
The petitioner, Gajendra Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashment of an FIR dated 28 January 2026, which alleged his involvement in a narcotics offence under Sections 8, 20, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act, based on statements of co‑accused who claimed they would deliver 113 kg of …
The petitioners, who are in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their relationship and to provide protection against harassment. The petitioners admitted they were in a live-in relationship without a prior …
The applicant, Rajendra Mohan Agarwal, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of a pending criminal case (Complaint No. 10995 of 2022) involving allegations under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 and 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant is …
The applicant, Chahat Ram, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite parties, Smt Medha Rupam and another, willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 18‑02‑2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 5274 of 2026. The order had been served on 23‑02‑2026, but compliance had not been …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu, who was arrested in Crime No. 482 of 2025 under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated in an alleged abduction, stating that the victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS indicated a consensual …
The applicant, Majid, filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 02‑08‑2011 issued by the Special Judge (Gangsters Act) in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that he was already on …
The applicant, Ritesh Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of a pending Session trial (Case No. 646 of 2025) in which he is charged under Section 307 IPC. He argued that the pending case adversely affected his police …
Anil Kumar filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the District Magistrate and other officials to vacate a Chakmarg/Chakroad allegedly encroached upon, relying on an inter‑departmental letter dated 24‑02‑2026 from the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate to the District …
Petitioner Smt. Shweta filed a habeas corpus petition alleging illegal detention. The petitioners later informed the court that she was voluntarily staying with her brother, Vikas Goyal, and was not in any illegal custody. The petitioners sought dismissal of the writ on the ground that the petition …
Shreya, an unmarried daughter of a deceased Assistant Teacher, filed a writ petition seeking a compassionate appointment under the U.P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974. After her mother’s death, her father remarried and expelled Shreya and her younger …
Petitioner Aishraj filed a writ petition seeking the expeditious disposal of his application dated 24‑02‑2026 filed under Section 67‑A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which was pending beyond the prescribed time‑bound period. The sole relief prayed for was a direction to the respondent to decide the …
The applicant, Ajay Srivastava, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 90 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 363, 366 and 368 of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that the FIR was lodged five days after the alleged incident, that the victim's statements under Sections 161 and 164 …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 14648 of 2024) arising from a charge under Section 67B of the Income Tax Act. The applicant argued that he had not been arrested and that the charge‑sheet had already been …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Panmati, a female accused in a case involving alleged assault on the victim Kanhaiya and his mother. The applicant claimed false implication and argued that the FIR did not specifically assign her a role, while the State highlighted her alleged …
The applicant, Sone Lal Patel, was charged in Crime No.58 of 2026 under Sections 64 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code for an alleged offence investigated by the Sarai Inayat police station, Prayagraj. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court noted a delay of about two and a half …
The petitioner applied for a fresh passport, but the Regional Passport Officer in Lucknow refused to process the application citing a pending criminal case against him. He filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the officer to consider his application and issue the passport within a …
Majahar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate of Dumariyaganj to decide a pending application (Misc. Case No. 18/2025) arising out of Original Case No. 299 of 2020 between the parties. The petitioner argued that the lower court should …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court No.2, Allahabad, to decide the pending matrimonial suit (No.1143 of 2024) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on an expedited basis. The petition specifically …
The applicant, Ajay Dubey, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite a pending complaint (Case No. 4078 of 2024) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant argued that the case had been …
Mohammad Saddam filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS and Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 07‑04‑2026, a subsequent order dismissing his recall application, and the entire criminal proceeding arising from a 2019 case under IPC sections 363, …
Aftab Alam applied for renewal of his passport but the Regional Passport Officer in Lucknow refused to issue it, citing a pending criminal case against him. He filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to re‑issue the passport. The Court noted that, as held in Pawan Kumar …
Ritesh Yadav, the applicant, is facing a pending criminal trial (Session Case No. 643 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 392, 411, 414 and 120‑B IPC. He was selected for a post in the Indian Army and later for a clerkship in the Chandigarh High Court, but adverse police verification …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Smt. Preeti, who was charged with murder under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the BNS in Crime No.207 of 2025. The applicant argued that the FIR was based merely on a matrimonial dispute, that she had no motive, no eyewitnesses, and no …
Petitioner Mukesh Kumar Yadav filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition contained certain discrepancies, leading the petitioner’s counsel to acknowledge that the petition was not properly pressed. The Court, after hearing counsel for the respondents, dismissed the petition …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachments by private respondents on plots 147 and 148 (Nali and Chakmarg) in Village Chakudhan, Tehsil Karhal, District Mainpuri. The standing counsel for the State highlighted that two cases …
The applicant, Vijay Kumar Yadav, filed a contempt application alleging that the District Magistrate, Smt. Kritika Jyotsana, willfully disobeyed the High Court’s order dated 18 March 2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 10030 of 2026. The order had been served to the opposite party on 26 March …
The applicant, Smt. Santosh Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the trial court to conclude a pending complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (case no. 17288 of 2021). The matter had been pending for a long period …
The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Muzaffarnagar to decide Original Suit No. 380/2024 (Km. Chairis & others vs Satpal) expeditiously. The sole relief claimed was for the High Court to order the lower court …
The applicant, Shivam Mishra, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Rajesh Prasad, willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 16‑10‑2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 15522 of 2025. The order was served on 04‑12‑2025, but the opposite party had not complied. The court observed …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 09‑02‑2026 issued by the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Complaint Case No. 23484 of 2024 (Vimlesh Kumari v. Akhilesh Kumar Singh & Others) under IPC sections 498A, 323, 506 and the Dowry …
The applicants filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 7 January 2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 45893 of 2025. The order was served on 22 January 2026, but the opposite party had not complied. The Court observed that a …
The petitioner, Palaram, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the trial court to decide Civil Suit No. OS/455 of 2015 (Palaram vs. Dinesh) within a fixed time. The petitioner’s counsel requested an expeditious disposal of the suit. The High Court observed that the civil …
The petitioner, Gita Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jalaun at Orai to decide Original Suit No. 425 of 2022 (Mahendra Pratap Singh v. Smt. Kesh Kunwar) within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the civil suit …
The applicant, Saroj Devi, filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 5 March 2022 and the charge sheet dated 13 June 2021 in Crime No. 0314 of 2021, which alleged offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …
Manoj Kumar alias Pinki filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. His counsel, Sri Lavkush Kumar Bhatt, sought to withdraw the petition while seeking liberty to file an appropriate application in a first appeal against Order No.1175 of 2025. The respondents, represented by C.S.C., …
Smt. Raj Kumari Devi filed a contempt application alleging that opposite parties 3 and 4 violated an interim order issued in her writ petition (Writ‑B No. 270 of 2025). The court observed that those parties were not parties to the original writ proceedings. Consequently, the court held that no case …
The petitioner, Babloo, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 26-10-2023 passed under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The State, represented by its standing counsel, argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy—specifically, filing a restoration application or …
The petitioners, Kasim Khan and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 challenging the registration of an FIR alleging that they were involved in negotiating a contract killing. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others, opposed the petition. The …
The applicants filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 19-12-2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 12547 of 2025. The order had been served to the opposite party on 12-01-2026, but …
Petitioner Kamal Sen Singh filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash orders dated 31‑05‑2025 and 25‑11‑2024 issued by the District Magistrate and Assistant Collector, Jaunpur, under section 67(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, alleging that the inspection report was ex parte and that he was …
M/s Madhav Traders filed a contempt application alleging that Mukesh Tripathi, Secretary of Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 29‑08‑2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 21324 of 2025. The order had been served on 08‑09‑2025 but remained unimplemented. The …
Dr. Madhuri Singh filed a contempt application against Dr. Bindrawan Lal Sharma for allegedly refusing to comply with a judgment dated 22 September 2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 14307 of 2025. The order was served to the opposite party on 29 September 2025, but the court found that the order …
Dr. Neel Kamal Sharma filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, and there was no representation from the opposite party. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the …
The applicant, Smt. Anupama Jaiswal, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 980 of 2023 seeking to move the suit to another court. The respondent, Shri Sumit Kumar Jaiswal, was the opposite party. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press or prosecute the transfer application. The …
Petitioner Karan Sahu filed a habeas corpus petition alleging illegal detention after a remand order was issued on a printed proforma without any application of mind. The petitioner contended that the remand order violated Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution and cited several Supreme Court …
The petitioner, Dashrath @ Somi, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his detention under a remand order dated 21-05-2023 issued by the Remand Magistrate, District Jhansi, on a printed proforma. The petition argued that the remand order showed a non‑application of mind and violated Articles 21 …
Sneha Srivastava filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court against Deepak Kumar Srivastava. No counsel or party appeared to argue the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted …
Santosh Singh filed a criminal revision under Section 319 Cr.P.C. challenging the Additional Sessions Judge’s order that summoned him as an accused in a murder case (Sections 302, 504, 436 IPC). The revisionist argued that the trial court relied on eye‑witness statements claiming a licensed gun was …
The applicant, Home Guard Rajwant Singh, filed a contempt application after the District Commandant of Homeguard, Manoj Singh Baghel, allegedly failed to comply with a writ court order. The respondent appeared before the court and submitted a compliance affidavit along with an exemption application, …
The applicant, Smt. Sonia Sharma, filed Transfer Application (Civil) No. 1012 of 2023 seeking to have the suit transferred to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, and the opposite party, Sunil Kumar Sharma, was the only party present. The High Court …
Shweta Sharma filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court against Ashish Sharma. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application, while the opposite party's counsel was present. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the transfer application and …
The applicant, Smt. Renu Yadav, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 1016 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the transfer application. …
The petitioner, Dilip Kumar Sonkar, challenged a government order that increased his contribution for a security guard from 10% to 50% of the guard's cost, demanding payment of Rs. 4,11,927 for six months. He argued that his annual income of Rs. 6,12,830 made the amount unaffordable and that the …
Arvind Chaudhary (Kalua) filed a criminal revision under Section 203 of the Cr.P.C. challenging a Judicial Magistrate’s order dismissing his complaint. He alleged that the Magistrate ignored material evidence, including his exoneration from an FIR containing serious IPC offences, and that the order …
The applicants, Bajrang Lal Dubey and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicants argued that the application had become infructuous. The court considered the submission that the relief sought was …
The applicant, Rocky, sought bail in a criminal case (Cr. No. 0068 of 2025) alleging that he recorded an indecent video of a married woman and threatened to circulate it. The prosecution presented the victim’s statement and a video recovered from the applicant’s mobile, asserting the allegations are …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Farzand alias Faizan, who was arrested in a case under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4(2) for alleged sexual offences against a 13‑year‑old girl. The applicant pleaded innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged after …
Sachin Kumar appealed to the Allahabad High Court by filing a criminal revision against the Family Court’s order rejecting his application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. His wife had obtained a maintenance decree under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. after the husband failed to appear, leading to …
Akanksha Chopra filed a transfer application (Civil No. 460 of 2024) against Saurabh Chopra in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The court held that an application not prosecuted cannot proceed and therefore dismissed it for want of …
The applicants filed a contempt application alleging non‑compliance with a writ court order dated 24‑11‑2022 concerning an auction. The opposite party submitted a compliance affidavit and a discharge application, stating that the bank, unaware of the writ order, had conducted an e‑auction on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case alleging forgery, cheating and criminal intimidation in connection with a sale deed of agricultural land. They contended that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 4011 of 2018, which stemmed from a 1995 FIR alleging kidnapping under Sections 363 and 366 of the IPC. The dispute was settled amicably: the victim had married applicant No.1, lived together for 28 …
The petitioner, Dhananjay Rai, challenged the consolidation officer’s orders dated 01.07.2025 and 09.10.2025 relating to a time‑barred title objection filed under Section 9‑A(2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953. The officer had earlier condoned the delay in filing the objection …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.25957 of 2025) pending against them for offences under Sections 69, 89 and 115(2) of the BNSS. The key factual matrix is that applicant No.3 married the victim (opposite party No.2) on …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 15‑11‑2023 and the cognizance order dated 29‑01‑2024 in a murder case (Sections 302 and 120‑B IPC) pending before the Additional District and Session Judge, Meerut. The applicant alleged that the …
The applicants, Rahul Garg and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 18‑06‑2025 and the criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 1026 of 2023 (Venkatesh v. Rahul Garg & Ors.) filed under IPC sections 406, 468 and 471. Both parties, …
The petitioner, Siddarth Raja Parmar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from the police after the police had submitted a charge-sheet in the magistrate's court. The petitioner argued that the first information report (FIR) should be considered at this stage. The High …
The applicants sought quashing of criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 674 of 2025) that arose from a matrimonial dispute which had been converted into offences under Sections 87, 351(2), 64(1) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. The parties, including the son‑in‑law of the opposing party, had reached a …
The applicants, Udaivir Singh Baghel and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants expressed a desire to withdraw the application, stating an intention to possibly file a fresh one …
The applicant Shahrukh, charged under the POCSO Act for offences alleged in case crime No. 980 of 2024, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of the charge‑sheet and cognizance order. He asserted that he had married the victim on 04‑10‑2024, that they were living together …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Babu alias Mehmood, accused of raping a minor under Sections 64(1), 332(2), 351(3) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused entered the informant's house on 22 April 2025 and raped the informant's …
The applicant, Poonam, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 599 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The court also vacated any …
The applicant, Smt. Gaura, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The respondent, Arun Kumar Sahu, was represented by counsel. The court observed that the …
The applicant, Rakesh Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The applicant sought dismissal of the application on the ground that it was not pressed. The learned …
The applicant, Rajani Sriwas, filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while counsel for the opposite party was present. The court examined the lack of prosecution of the application. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Deepu Goswami, who was arrested in connection with the recovery of 196.680 kg of ganja from a truck in Agra. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated and …
The appellant, Shriram, was alleged in a FIR of 28 June 2021 to have participated in an attempt to outrage a woman's modesty and a shooting incident, but the investigating officer exonerated him and did not include him in the charge-sheet. During trial, the Special Judge summoned Shriram under …
Ram Gopal filed Criminal Revision No. 5006 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the State of U.P. and another party. The revisionist was represented by counsel Prem Sagar Verma and Tripathi B.G. Bhai. During the hearing, the learned counsel for the revisionist expressed …
The applicant, Jaki Ahmad, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 7377 of 2024) arising from Crime No. 430 of 2023, which were instituted under Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The applicant argued that the dispute was …
The petitioner Bittan Devi filed a petition under Article 227 challenging two orders: one of the Additional Session Judge/Special Judge (POCSO Act) dismissing a criminal revision, and another of the ACJM converting her application under Section 175(3) of the BNSS into a complaint case. She alleged …
Lalit applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5(L)/6 of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, which was filed five days after the alleged incident, and that the victim, though recorded as a minor …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Irshad alias Mulli, who was charged in Crime No. 130 of 2025 with offences including assault with a sharp‑edged weapon, among others. The applicant argued that although …
The applicant, Faizan, was charged under IPC sections 65(1) and 351(2) and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly raping his 13‑year‑old domestic helper on 18 April 2025. The prosecution alleged repeated sexual assaults, while the defence argued that the FIR was filed more than a month …
The revisionist challenged the Additional Sessions Judge's order rejecting a discharge application and refusing to omit charge under Section 308 IPC, alleging that the medical report supporting the charge was forged. The High Court examined the medical evidence, noting that the CT scan was performed …
The appellant, Bagedu alias Ramansh Raj Singh, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A‑1 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to quash a cognizance order dated 14 July 2025 issued by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Chandauli. The appellant alleged …
The petition filed by Vineet was listed before the Allahabad High Court but no counsel or parties appeared on the scheduled date. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated. No substantive facts or legal arguments were considered. …
The appellants filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(1) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to quash the cognizance order dated 12‑01‑2023 in a case that also involved offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and 354A. Both parties submitted …
The petitioners, Smt. Shivani Devi and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They failed to appear for hearing on the scheduled dates of 17‑02‑2026, 22‑04‑2026 and again on 06‑05‑2026, despite the court’s revised lists. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State …
The High Court of Allahabad heard Contempt Application No. 5066 of 2025 filed by Moin Ahmad and another against Mukul Anand Pandey, a District Basic Education Officer. The Court noted that the respondents, including the District Officer and the Secretary of the U.P. Board of Basic Education, had …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused Ramesh Yadav, who was charged with multiple IPC offences including cheating, forgery and criminal conspiracy. The applicant’s counsel argued that he …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of accused Ramesh Yadav, who was charged under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 and 120‑B for a case registered at Kotwali Police Station, Deoria. The …
The appellants, who are tenants of a house owned by the complainant (a lawyer), were summoned under a criminal complaint alleging assault, theft and caste‑based abuse, invoking IPC 323 and Section 3(1)(da) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The High Court …
Smt. Priyanka Kumari filed a transfer application before the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the pending suit to another court. The applicant was represented by counsel Raghvendra Singh, while the opposite party, Amit Kumar, was represented by Hare Krishna Tripathi. No appearance was made by …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashal of criminal proceedings (Case No. 774 of 2019) arising from offences under Sections 377, 376, 504, 323 and 313 IPC. The dispute stemmed from a matrimonial relationship that ended in a mutual divorce and a compromise …
Smt. Sarita Singh filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 731 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court seeking transfer of the suit against Sri Rampravesh Singh. The applicant was represented by counsel Ajeet Kumar Singh, while the opposite party was represented by Pradeep Kumar Rai and Prakhar …
Vishal Pasi applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0234 of 2025) filed under Sections 351(2) and 76 of the BNS, originally concerning criminal intimidation and later escalated to a rape allegation under Section 183. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was lodged 20 days …
Anil Kumar, accused under Sections 65(2) BNS and 5M/6 of the POCSO Act for raping a minor, applied for bail during trial. The prosecution alleged that the victim was taken to a secluded place, found naked and bloodied in a sugarcane field. The applicant contended he was falsely implicated, noting …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 1 July 2018 and the cognizance order dated 8 January 2019 in Criminal Case No. 103 of 2019 (State vs. Anwar), which involved offences under Sections 354 and 452 of the IPC. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 8022 of 2021, which involved offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had entered into a compromise, which was verified by the trial court on 20‑12‑2025. The State’s …
Petitioner Km Nimisha Saxena filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 15994 of 2024) challenging an order of transfer dated 23 August 2024 issued by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner contended that a new transfer policy had been introduced by the State Government and that she would apply for her …
Mange applied for bail in two criminal cases (Cr. No. 379/2024 and Cr. No. 13990/2024) involving alleged assault and related offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 341(2) and 110 of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, stating he was falsely implicated and that a prior FIR had been lodged …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the proceedings in State v. Mukesh Kumar (Case No. 2978 of 2023) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑III, Ghaziabad. They contended that the cognizance order dated 09‑11‑2023 was …
The petitioners challenged a revisional order dated 22 September 2025 that had set aside a trial court’s dismissal of a Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. application and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. The trial court had held the allegations to be civil in nature and directed the complainant to …
The applicants Tejpal and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summons and the entire criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 378 of 2024) arising from Crime No. 175 of 2022, which involved offences under IPC sections 308, 325, 323, 504 and 506. The applicants …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 26787 of 2022) on the ground that they had reached an amicable compromise with the State. The State did not object to the filing of a compromise deed before the trial court. The …
The applicants, Imran Ali and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 02‑09‑2025 issued by the Special Judge, POCSO Act, Bareilly, in a case involving offences under the IPC, POCSO Act, SC/ST Act and the Uttar …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Yadram, who is accused of embezzling Rs.2,28,000 by transferring customers' bank funds to his own account. The charges include IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Monu Sharma, who was implicated in an NDPS case (Criminal No. 173 of 2025) for allegedly being found in a truck from which 196.68 kg of ganja was seized. The applicant …
The petitioner sought to have his name recorded under Section 12 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 based on a sale deed dated 13 July 2020, after the village had been notified under Section 6 of the same Act on 28 February 2013. Earlier orders by the Consolidation Officer in his favour …
The revisionists Jagdish Singh and others filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Gram Court Magistrate dated 5 September 2024, which rejected their application under Section 245(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) on the ground that the evidentiary stage under Section 244 CrPC …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abrar, a 19‑year‑old accused in a criminal case (Crime No.212 of 2025) involving alleged sexual offences under the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the relationship with the 16‑year‑old victim was consensual and that the …
The petitioners, Tayra Khatoon and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They failed to appear for hearing on the scheduled dates of 17 February 2026, 22 April 2026, and again on 6 May 2026, despite being listed. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State appeared, …
The applicant, Santosh Kamal, sought bail in a rape case (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 39639 of 2025) where he is alleged to be the biological father of a child born to the victim, as established by DNA testing. He argued that his co‑accused had already been granted bail and that he had no …
The petitioner, Javaharlal Gaud, filed a criminal complaint alleging assault by the respondents, but the trial court dismissed the complaint on the basis that the allegations were exaggerated and no medical injury report was produced. Gaud contended that the police refused to facilitate a medical …
The applicants, Rajendra Singh Aswal and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. Counsel for the applicants was Hemant Shukla, while the respondent was represented by G.A. The matter was listed …
The applicant, Soni Kumari, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS No. 44796 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The opposite parties raised a preliminary objection that an appeal under Section 14-A had already been filed against the impugned order. The …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rajni Tiwari in criminal case No. 697 of 2025, where she was charged under IPC sections 80, 85, 115(2), 351(2), 352 and sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. She had already been granted interim anticipatory bail on 19 November …
The petitioners, Smt. Priyanki and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They failed to appear for hearing on the scheduled dates of 17 February 2026, 22 April 2026, and again on 6 May 2026, despite being listed. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State appeared, …
Sunita Rana filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to restore her name to the voter list of St. Thomas Church, Meerut and to compel the Diocese of Agra to decide a representation she had filed. The Single Judge allowed an innocuous prayer and directed the Diocese to decide the representation without …
The petitioners, Smt. Anita and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They failed to appear for hearing on the original date and on two subsequent dates (17‑02‑2026 and 22‑04‑2026) despite being listed. The respondent State, represented by the Additional Chief Standing …
The applicants, Vinay Kumar and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) was present in court. The presiding judge …
Avinash Mishra filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. against Raja Babu. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, although the learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the application. Consequently, …
The applicant, Satpal Singh Kashyap, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The court considered the request for withdrawal. No substantive merits of the original …
The applicant, Satpal Singh Kashyap, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and, without further argument, dismissed the …
The applicant, Smt Mohita, filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while the opposite party's counsel, Dr. Kamlesh Kumar, was present. The court noted the absence of the applicant's …
The petitioner, Niranjan Kushwaha, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the possibility of his arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted that an interim order was already …
The petitioner, Dharmveer Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging the dismissal of his criminal complaint by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, which held that the dispute was essentially a property matter and the allegations against the respondent were false. The complaint …
The applicants, Shivam and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 26042 of 2022, which stemmed from a FIR alleging offences under Sections 498A, 323, 377, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached a mutual settlement on 14 …
The petitioner, owner of a scrap vehicle business, challenged the seizure of eight engines by police under Sections 317(2), 317(4) and 317(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, claiming the allegations were false and that he had produced ownership documents. The release application filed before the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Avanish, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Case Crime No. 20 of 2025) involving alleged violations of Sections 318(4), 336(3), 340(2), 317(2), 61(2) of the BNS and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Ravi Kumar who was arrested in an NDPS case (Sections 8/20) for alleged possession of 1.498 kg of charas. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior criminal record, and argued …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Nizam, who was charged under IPC Sections 137(1), 65(1), 351(2) and Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged rape. The prosecution alleged that the victim was assaulted after being taken from a nursery, with the FIR lodged five days …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Danish alias Sonu, who was arrested in connection with a robbery and alleged theft of Rs. 6.50 lakh. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated in Crime No. 197 of 2025, filed under Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the IPC, and that the FIR was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Ankit who faces charges under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 316(2) of the same Act and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …
Smt. Mamta Kumari filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 993 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit against Virendra Singh. The application was listed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Rules of the Court. The court observed that the applicant’s counsel had not complied …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aziz in a case registered as Crime No. 227 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 64, 351(2) of the IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, and Section 67 of the IT Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the FIR was lodged eight …
The applicants, Vipin Chauhan and another, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to set aside a September 2025 order of the Additional Sessions Judge that had rejected their request, under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to recall and re‑examine three witnesses. The High …
The applicant, Mohd Hamid, sought to quash a government order and obtain compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013, arguing that his shop should not be demolished without due process. The High Court had earlier disposed of his writ petition on …
Pradeep Kumar Nai was arrested on 4 January 2024 after a large seizure of 620 kg of ganja, of which 50.8 kg was found in his possession. He filed three bail applications under several IPC offences and Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act, alleging non‑compliance of Section 50 and Section 52A and …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash an order dated 11 September 2025 that dismissed his request to recall witness PW‑4 for cross‑examination. The trial court had allowed the examination‑in‑chief of PW‑4 on 25 July 2024, deferred cross‑examination, …
The petitioner, an Indian Army officer posted in Leh, filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order dated 13-11-2025 that granted Rs.5,000 per month to his wife and Rs.2,000 to his child. He contended that his wife, who earns approximately Rs.45,000 per month through embroidery …
Anju was arrested in a murder case (Criminal No. 440 of 2023) under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC for allegedly beating a cyclist with a lathi, leading to his death. The defence argued that the post‑mortem report showed only simple injuries that could not have caused death and suggested the victim …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summons order dated 14.08.2025 and the entire criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 2958 of 2025, which arose from a matrimonial dispute involving alleged offences under Sections 85 and 115(2) of the BNS and …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The applicant failed to appear before the court even after a revised call on 6 January 2025. The State's brief holder, Shri B.N. Upadhyay, was present, but no representation was made for the …
The applicant, Sonu Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case alleging assault on the mother of the complainant. The applicant claimed innocence and argued that the medical report showed no injury, …
The applicants, Mataru and another, were charged under sections 308(4), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act in a criminal case filed by the State of U.P. They filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order, claiming they were falsely …
The petitioners Prashant Sharma and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance …
The applicant, Akhtar Ali, filed a contempt application after a writ petition (Writ‑C No.38204 of 2025) was disposed, where the court had ordered that no demolition of his property could occur unless the title was acquired by voluntary transfer or under the Right to Fair Compensation and …
The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Prashant Kumar, filed a contempt application against the applicant, Suneel Chauhan, alleging non‑compliance with a writ order. The magistrate submitted an exemption application and a compliance affidavit, indicating that the restoration application had been decided on …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Guljar Ali and Jakir Ali, who run an educational institution and were implicated in a 2014 FIR alleging misappropriation of scholarship funds. The charge sheet was filed in 2025, and the applicants claimed they were falsely …
The applicant, Abdul Kareem, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. Both parties failed to appear for the hearing, and even the revised call saw no representation from the applicant, though a brief holder for the State was present. The court noted the …
The petitioner, Virendra, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from potential arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High …
Pushpendra and two others filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court against Shri Amit Tripathi, Tehsildar, alleging non‑compliance with a writ order dated 06‑10‑2025. The petitioners sought to hold the Tehsildar in contempt for failing to issue a caste certificate. The Tehsildar, …
The petitioners were summoned under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 474 IPC on the allegation that a sale deed dated 23 March 1957, executed in favour of the petitioner's father, was forged. The State alleged that the petitioners were merely tenants who fabricated the deed to claim ownership, and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal case (State Vs. Irshad and others) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharanpur, on the basis of a compromise that had not been verified. The High Court directed that the parties appear …
Smt. Anushka Sharma filed a transfer application under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Rules of the Court before the Allahabad High Court. The application was to be considered by Justice Yogendra Kumar Srivastava. The Court observed that the applicant's counsel had not taken the requisite procedural steps …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 1574 of 2024) arising from offences under Sections 323, 324, 325, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicants and the second opposite party had reached a compromise, which was verified by the trial …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 356 of 2025) on the ground that they had reached an amicable compromise with the State. The State, through the A.G.A., raised no objection to the filing of a …
Petitioners Smt. Ratana Sonkar and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They failed to appear for hearing on the scheduled dates of 17-02-2026, 22-04-2026 and again on 06-05-2026, despite the court issuing revised lists. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State …
The applicant, Mohamad Zuhaib, filed a contempt application after a writ petition was disposed directing that his shop could not be demolished without consent or acquisition under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013. The State had purchased and demolished …
The applicant, Sohit, sought bail in a criminal case involving alleged assault under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The FIR and eyewitness statements identified him as the assailant using a ‘lathi’, but the medical report indicated that the injury to the victim’s eye was not …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 9749 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahr, on the ground that they had reached a compromise with the State, which was verified by the trial court. The …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 52 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The applicant claimed that he and the second opposite party had reached an amicable compromise and therefore …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shiva Gautam, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the victim, a 19‑year‑old adult as confirmed by an ossification test, …
Anuj, the husband, filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 26‑09‑2025 of the Judicial Magistrate, Mathura, which had partly allowed the application of respondents under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 for interim maintenance. The petitioner argued …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 1575 of 2024) arising from an alleged offence under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506. The applicants and the second opposite party had entered into a compromise, which was verified by the trial …
The applicants, Udaiveer alias Bhola and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 1647 of 2021, which arose from offences under Sections 323, 325, 308, 504 and 506 IPC. They claimed that the dispute with the second opposite party had been …
The applicants, Akash Nishad and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and summons issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar, in a case arising from alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351 and 333 of the B.N.S. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and the entire criminal proceeding, claiming that they had reached an amicable compromise with the second opposite party. The State did not oppose the filing of a compromise deed before the trial …
Amarnath Sharma, accused of offences under Sections 147, 302, 307, 323 and 504 IPC, has been in judicial custody since December 7, 2019. This was his third bail application; the earlier two were dismissed. The applicant argued that the trial had been delayed for over six years, with only one of …
The petitioners, Sushma Keshari and two others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Sitaram Yadav, informed the court that the petition had become infructuous and should be dismissed. The standing counsel for the State of U.P., Rupesh Tiwari, raised no objection. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by 19‑year‑old Abhishek Pal, who was arrested on charges under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the CrPC, Section 4 of the POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST Act for an alleged sexual offence involving a 17‑year‑old girl. The applicant contended …
The applicant, Pragati, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the proceedings to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the transfer petition. Consequently, the transfer …
Pragya filed a transfer application (Civil No. 31 of 2024) seeking to move the pending suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The High Court observed that the application was not prosecuted and dismissed it for want of prosecution. As a …
The applicant, Smt Abhilasha Tiwari, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the civil suit to another jurisdiction. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. Consequently, the Court found that the application was not prosecuted. The …
Smt. Arushi Singhal filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 58 of 2024 against Nikunj Singhal in the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Jawahir Yadav, did not appear before the court to press the application. Consequently, the court noted a want of prosecution and dismissed the transfer …
Princy Gupta filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 89 of 2024 against Virendra Kumar. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The High Court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim order previously granted …
Swati Sahani filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 155 of 2024 seeking to have the pending suit transferred to another court. The application was listed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Rules of the Court. The High Court observed that the applicant's counsel had not complied with the procedural …
The applicant, Smt Saumya Jha, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 236 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to prosecute the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer …
In Transfer Application (Civil) No. 239 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court, Akshay Kumar filed an application seeking transfer of the suit against Manoj Kumar Sharma. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while the opposite party was represented by Ms. Pooja …
The case involved a transfer application filed by Dr. Ruby Singh against Dr. Shiv Pratap Singh. The applicant’s counsel, Anil Kumar Pandey, did not appear before the court to press the application. The opposite party’s counsel, including Ashok Kumar Mishra, Dharmendra Kumar Mishra, Manoj Kumar and …
Smt. Himanshi filed a transfer application (Civil No. 288 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on her behalf to prosecute the application. The Court observed that the application was not pursued and therefore dismissed it for want of prosecution. …
The applicant Amit Prakash Mishra filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The matter was listed on 21 April 2026, where the court noted that no one appeared on behalf of the applicant and only the State's counsel was present. The court vacated any …
The Uttar Pradesh Roller Sports Association filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive issues on merits were addressed. …
The appellant, Lal Sahai, filed a second appeal before the Allahabad High Court against the order of the lower court. The court issued notices on 13 February 2026 directing the appellant to engage counsel, but no Vakalatnama or any representation was filed. The court presumed the notices were duly …
The case arose from a night-time assault and shooting on 10‑11 June 1977 in Azamgarh, for which seven accused were convicted under IPC sections 147, 307/149 and 323/149 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. During the pendency of the appeal, six of the accused died, leaving only appellant Sarda …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 478 of 2021) filed against them under IPC sections 406, 323 and 506. They alleged that the case was false, motivated by malafides and that proceeding would …
The applicant Subham Sharma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The matter was listed for hearing on 21 April 2026, but the applicant failed to appear. On the revised list, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. Consequently, the High Court …
The appellants were convicted in 1986 for offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 324/149 and 436/149 and sentenced to up to three years' rigorous imprisonment. They appealed, not on the merits, but seeking the benefit of probation under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, with the State's …
Petitioners Smt. Kalawati and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet in the case had already …
The appellant Girraj filed a criminal appeal (No. 2579 of 1988) before the Allahabad High Court. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mathura, reported on 3 January 2026 that Girraj had died on 26 October 2016. The court considered whether the appeal could continue in view of the appellant's death. It …
The appellant, Shiv Prasad @ Raja Pandit, filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kanpur Nagar reported that the appellant died on 29 November 2010. The court considered whether the appeal could continue after the appellant's death. Relying on the …
The petitioners, Pooja and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that the charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report …
The petitioner, Smt. Archana Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against her. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the police had already submitted the charge-sheet in the case. The court held that since the charge-sheet was filed, the writ …
The petitioners, Ashok Kumar and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the subsequent charge sheet filed in Crime No.787 of 2022, which alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …
The appellants Vedram and two others appealed to quash the summoning order dated 4 October 2023 in Complaint Case No.02 of 2022 (Kumari Sarina Vs. Vedram & Others), alleging that the complaint under IPC sections 452, 354, 323, 504, 506 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act was fabricated. The …
