Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 11001–11200

KAMAL KANT AGARWAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the cognizance, summons and charge sheet in a criminal case alleging offences under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 406, 504 and 506 of the IPC. They claimed that a compromise had been reached with the State and that …

SANJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sanjay Kumar, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction. No opposition was filed against the application, and the respondent side was represented only by a government lawyer. The Court noted the absence of any …

DURGAversusIV A.S.J. BANDA AND OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The petitioner, Durga, was ordered by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate to remove an alleged encroachment on a public way under Section 133 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Durga challenged this order through a criminal revision, which was dismissed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge. She then filed a …

TRIVENI PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Triveni Prasad, who is charged under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murder. The applicant argued that five witnesses had turned hostile, the trial was delayed, and there was no risk of flight or tampering. The State contended …

PREM SHANKAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 2354 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that had been passed. The dismissal was …

DURVIJAY SINGH and OthersversusSRI GANESH KANOUJIA

The High Court had earlier, on 13 September 2021, directed the opposite party to complete proceedings under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, in Writ‑C No. 22240 of 2021. The opposite party filed a compliance affidavit on 12 March 2024 stating that the required proceedings were …

RAJPAL SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 31‑12‑2014 and the related proceedings in a case under Section 308 IPC, on the ground that the dispute had been amicably settled by compromise. The trial court had verified the …

OM KANT DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Om Kant Dubey, filed a writ petition in 2006 challenging the appointment of respondent No.6 as a lecturer in Art at National Inter College Bhogaon, alleging a legally defective selection process. The petitioner was on a short‑term appointment and therefore lacked standing to contest …

VISHAL VERMA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 100076 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 342, 354, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …

SATISH CHANDRA GOYALversusMR RAJ KARAN NAYYAR AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. The court referred to earlier instructions which indicated that no criminal case existed and therefore an FIR could not be lodged. Based on this finding, the court held that the basis for contempt was absent. Consequently, …

MUKESH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants sought to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 3005 of 2022) filed under several IPC offences arising from a land‑related dispute, invoking Section 528 of the CrPC. They claimed they were falsely implicated and that no offence was made out against them. The State opposed, contending …

RAJPAL SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and related proceedings arising from offences under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 504 and 506 of the IPC. During hearing, the applicants’ counsel withdrew all prayers except to surrender before the …

SANJUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Sanju appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking to set aside an order of the Additional Sessions Judge that rejected his application under Section 173(4) of the BNSS. The trial court held that the …

SHUBHAM RAIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shubham Rai was arrested in a cyber‑crime case (Crime No. 43 of 2025) under several provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Information Technology Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that the recovered cash and mobile phone belonged to him and that there was no …

PREM PAL ALIAS JAYPAL AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Prem Pal alias Jaypal and six others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 20‑02‑2023 in a case registered as Crime No. 386 of 2022 under IPC sections 147, 336 and 323. They alleged that they were falsely implicated, that the …

KRITIKA AGARWALversusARPIT AGARWAL

In a civil transfer application (No. 38 of 2025) filed by Kritika Agarwal against Arpit Agarwal, the applicant failed to appear or present counsel before the court. The High Court noted that no one had appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the transfer request. Consequently, the court …

SMT. MEGHAversusAKSHAY KUMAR

Smt. Megha filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 40 of 2025 seeking to move the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on her behalf to pursue the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim order previously granted …

SMT. SAKSHI JAINversusABHISHEK JAIN

Smt. Sakshi Jain filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 43 of 2025 against Abhishek Jain in the Allahabad High Court. The application was filed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Rules of the Court. Counsel for the applicant, Avinash Pandey, was observed to have not taken the requisite procedural …

SMT VANDANA @ BANDANAversusSHIVAM YADAV

The applicant, Smt Vandana @ Bandana, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The court also vacated any interim order that …

AMAN FAUJI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal case, charge sheet dated 20.08.2022 and summons order dated 13.02.2024 in State vs. Aman Fauji and others, alleging false implication. The State opposed, contending that the FIR, …

CHHOTU SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The writ petition filed by Chhotu Singh Yadav remained pending since 2021. The High Court had issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared nor was the case marked to show that …

MONU PALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the CrPC for Monu Pal, who was arrested in connection with a case under IPC Sections 305, 331(4) and 317(2). The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the alleged recovery of weapons and money lacked independent …

MOHD. CHAMANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petition under Article 227 was listed before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for default. The interim order, if any, was vacated. No substantive merits were considered.

KUMARI SEEMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The writ petition filed by Kumari Seema against the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents has been pending since 2021. The High Court issued a notice directing that all old cases up to 2022 be heard in the first round and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. …

HARIOMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Hariom, who is accused under several IPC sections for allegedly running over a tractor that caused the deaths of Maan Pal and Amar Singh. The applicant argued that the FIR and witness statements contain contradictions, only three of the …

TRINETRA FILLING STATION AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Trinetra Filling Station and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the applicant or the opposite party to press the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for want …

ANIL SHARMA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear or seek adjournment when the matter was listed. The court noted the absence of any effective representation and held that the cause of action had become stale due to the passage of time. Consequently, the writ …

ABHISHEK RAIversusSMT. RINKI RAI

The appellant, Abhishek Rai, failed to appear before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad even after a revised call. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal on the ground of want of prosecution. No further arguments or evidence were presented. The respondent, Smt. Rinki Rai, was …

DEEPAK YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Deepak Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 4 July 2025 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 573 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the BNSS. The applicant and the second …

SATYAM SHANKHVAR AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHER

Satyam Shankhvar and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The application was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Deepak Verma. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants, while the learned Additional …

JAGDISH CHANDRA SAINI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Jagdish Chandra Saini and two others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, while counsel for the respondents were present. The court noted that the matter, listed in 2015, was an old pending case and …

BEER BAHADUR PASWAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a prior order. The court had earlier referred the matter to mediation on the condition that the petitioners deposit Rs.55,000 before the mediation centre. The petitioners failed to make the …

REENA DEVIversusSTATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Reena Devi, sought to operate a fishery lease that had originally been granted to another individual, Ram Hari, who never utilized it. She deposited the required amount after obtaining permission to do so, but her subsequent application to operate the lease was rejected on the ground …

RAVINDRARAJA @ GANUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ravindraraja @ Ganu, was arrested in a case (Crime No. 196 of 2024) based on information from an informer, although his name did not appear in the FIR. The prosecution alleged recovery of anklets, coins and Rs.2450, but there was no independent witness and the only evidence against …

SALMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Salman in a case registered under Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident, and that there were no independent …

SMT. GUDDI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Guddi Devi alleged that a toilet constructed by respondents encroached upon a five‑foot public passage in front of her house, reducing the width to two feet. The Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) initially held that no encroachment existed, but the Additional Sessions Judge, in Criminal …

DR JAG PRASAD CHATURVEDIversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dr. Jag Prasad Chaturvedi, filed a writ petition alleging that he was not receiving his current pension despite an interim order dated 06.02.2024 directing payment. The petitioner claimed the delay was due to the absence of a Pension Payment Order. The respondents, the State and two …

SALMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Salman in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 3576 of 2026, seeking release in a case (Crime No. 292 of 2025) under Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was falsely …

SMT. RUBY MISHRAversusSRI SARVESH DUBEY

The applicant, Smt. Ruby Mishra, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court against Sri Sarvesh Dubey. The opposite party argued that subsequent developments had extinguished any cause of action. The court examined whether a viable cause of action remained and whether the petition had …

SMT. JYOTI SINGH @ JYOTI SINGHversusAMIT KUMAR SINGH

Smt. Jyoti Singh filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court against Amit Kumar Singh. No counsel or party appeared to argue the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim order previously granted was vacated. …

RAJ KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant sought quashing of the Special Judge's cognizance and summoning order in Complaint Case No.57 of 2025, alleging that the order was passed without granting the accused an opportunity of hearing as mandated by Section 223(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and violated …

SMT. DEEPA MODANWALversusMAHENDRA MODANWAL

Smt. Deepa Modanwal filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 194 of 2022 seeking to transfer the suit against Mahendra Modanwal. The applicant failed to appear before the court to press the application. Consequently, the Hon'ble Court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The …

SONVEERversusSTATE OF U.P.

Sonveer was arrested on 10‑11‑2025 in connection with a case (Crime No. 682 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 305, 331(4) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR was filed on 23‑10‑2025, more than a month after the alleged incident, and the applicant’s name was omitted from it. …

HANSRAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief in a criminal matter. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The Court also vacated any …

MANOJversusSTATE OF U.P.

Manoj, the husband of a woman who died within five years of marriage, is charged under Sections 498A, 304B of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He has been in custody since December 2021 and has filed three bail applications, all of which were rejected. The court examined …

KAPIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Kapil Kumar appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking to quash an order dated 06.12.2024 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (P.A.) in Bijnor, which had framed charges under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 352 BNS and 3(1)5‑Ka of the …

RISHABHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Rishabh was arrested in connection with a case originally registered under section 304(2) BNS for alleged murder, but the investigation was later recast as robbery under sections 309(4) and 317(2) BNS. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, no incriminating material …

ANAND KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Anand Kushwaha, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 340 of 2024) alleging fraud and forgery related to a sale deed of property allegedly belonging to Jeevan Lal Mishra. He contended that the FIR was lodged by him, the allegations of forgery are false, and that the …

RAISversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rais, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 06 of 2026) involving alleged fraud and several IPC offences, claiming he had returned the entire misappropriated amount of Rs.5,30,000 to the informant and that the informant raised no objection. The State opposed bail, but the …

KALEEM KHANversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Kaleem Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the revised call, but the petitioner was not present while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that the …

SMT. PRERNA SHRIVASTAVAversusMOHIT SHRIVASTAVA

Smt. Prerna Shrivastava filed an appeal against Mohit Shrivastava in the Allahabad High Court. The appellant's counsel, Yatharth Nath Pathak, failed to appear even after a revised call. The Court noted the non‑appearance and held that the appeal could not be prosecuted. Consequently, the judges …

SANTOSH KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Santosh Kumar and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The learned counsel for the applicants argued that the passage of time had rendered the …

SABIRversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sabir, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant asserted that …

IMRAN ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Imran Ali, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already …

JUBAIR ALAM AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The High Court noted that the filing of the charge …

MAHENDRA SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Mahendra Singh and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 indicating that the …

SMT. KHUSHBU DUBEYversusSHRI ARPIT RAWAT

The applicant, Smt. Khushbu Dubey, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have been in force. …

YASHPAL SINGHversusMALIKHAN SINGH

The applicant, Yashpal Singh, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 106 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to shift the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the Court observed that the application was not being …

SYED TASVIR HAIDER AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 25 of 2023, which involved offences under various sections of the erstwhile IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act, and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. No petitioner appeared before …

NATTHI SINGH @ BHOLA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 89 of 2023 under Section 306 of the erstwhile IPC, alleging their involvement. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The police had already …

MARUF HUSAIN AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 320/2023) in Crime No.197 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376 and 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Delhi Police Act. No petitioner counsel …

MAHENDRA PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mahendra Pratap Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the U.P. State Medical Faculty, Lucknow to register his Bachelor of Physiotherapy degree. The respondents argued that the matter had already been decided by a coordinate bench in Shailesh Kumar Mishra v. State …

HASIMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR under Section 363 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 26 of 2023, alleging their involvement. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, though the State's Additional Government …

ASHISH TRIVEDI AND 3 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ to quash the First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No. 130 of 2022, which alleged offences under various sections of the erstwhile IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the State’s Additional Government Advocate was …

DILSHAD @ DILLA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already been …

ANIL KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No.125 of 2023, alleging offences under Sections 406, 504 and 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State’s …

CHIRAG RAWATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Chirag Rawat filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The court examined an office report dated 2 May 2026 which confirmed that the charge‑sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …

SMT. MINAKSHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Smt. Minakshi filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 235 of 2021 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit to another court. The applicant's counsel was listed as Chandra Bhushan Prasad and Manoj Kumar Dhuriya, while the State of U.P. was represented by Anurag Sharma and C.S.C. …

SABIR AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No.63 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the erstwhile IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on …

ASGARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Asgar, accused in a dowry‑death case (Crime No. 810 of 2025) under Sections 80(2), 85 of the Evidence Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant, husband of the deceased, claimed the death was a suicide, citing the …

RISHABH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Rishabh and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet in Crime No. 17 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …

HAREESHCHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Hareeshchandra, who was arrested in a case under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 for allegedly cheating a person of Rs 1,00,000 by promising a job. The applicant contended that the FIR was vague, that the alleged receipt of money was …

BOBBY AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed against the accused. The Court noted that the …

SHIVPUJAN @ MODH. UMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Shivpujan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered against him. The petition was heard in the revised call before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had already been filed, as per a report …

GAURAV UPPAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and seeking quashing of the charge sheet filed in Crime No. 50 of 2023 under Sections 420 and 406 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the learned Additional Government …

KAPIL SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Kapil Sharma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 318/2023) in Crime No.66 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before …

VISHESH SHARMA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought to challenge the First Information Report (FIR) and the subsequent charge sheet filed in a criminal case under Sections 498-A, 323, 406, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. No petitioner counsel appeared before the Court, though the State’s …

KAVITA DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a First Information Report and subsequent charge sheet (A-120/2023) in Crime No.101 of 2023 under Section 366 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's …

LOVKUSH @ RAMACHARYA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Lovkush @ Ramacharya Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that a charge sheet had …

SANTOSH KUMAR PANDEY @ SANTOSH PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 02.05.2026 from the Legal Cell of the …

TAHIR HUSAIN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR under Section 420 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code in Crime No.124 of 2023. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The police had …

SHIWAM @ ASHUTOSH DUBEY AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Shiwam @ Ashutosh Dubey and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report …

AMAN NIGANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Aman Nigan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 212/2023) in Crime No.91 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 504, 506, 354, 354(Gh), 354(Gha) of the erstwhile IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. No …

RAJESH GUPTA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Rajesh Gupta and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the FIR and seeking to question the charge sheet filed in a criminal case under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC. The High Court noted that the charge sheet (No. A‑175/2023) had …

SMT. NEETU PRAJAPATIversusLAVKUSH PRAJAPATI

The applicant, Neetu Prajapati, filed a transfer application under Section 24 of the CPC seeking to move her divorce petition (filed under Section 13(1)(1Ka)(1Kha) of the Hindu Marriage Act) from the Family Court in Deoria to the Family Court in Varanasi. Both parties expressed a desire for an …

KM. NAJIS AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed against the petitioners. The Court noted that the filing …

BHAGWAN DAS PALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No.43 of 2022 under Sections 3 and 5 of the Prevention of Damages of Public Property Act, 1984. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The court …

SHIVANI MISHRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shivani Mishra and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 indicating that the police had …

RAJESH PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rajesh Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No. 281 of 2021, which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, while the …

UPENDRA GOND @ UPENDRA KUMAR GOND AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered under Section 363 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 217 of 2021. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The police had already …

RANJEETversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Ranjeet filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed …

SATISH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Satish Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that the charge sheet in the …

PREETI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No.106 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 363 and 504 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State’s …

AKASH KOSTHAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Akash Kostha who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false implication, …

NAFEES AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed by the Director …

SALEEMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Saleem, who is charged under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 61(2), 126(2), 115(2) and 351(3) of the BNS for alleged fraudulent execution of a sale deed. The applicant contended that the allegations are false, no consideration was received for the deed, …

MOHD HASHIMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohd Hashim, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 in a criminal case (Crime No.209/2025) alleging false accusations under IPC Sections 87, 137(2) and 70(1). He claimed innocence, highlighted contradictory statements of the victim’s sister, and pointed to bail …

BAJRANG LAL HARIRAM TIBREWALA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Bajrang Lal Hariram Tibrewala and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State. The petitioners' counsel informed the Court that the police had already submitted a charge-sheet in the underlying criminal …

KISMAT ALI @ WALI MOHAMMADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kismat Ali @ Wali Mohammad, who was accused under several sections of the BNS for alleged fraud involving a sale deed. The applicant claimed he was merely a witness to the deed executed by co‑accused Salim and denied any participation in the …

DR AKHILESH DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dr. Akhilesh Dubey, who faces multiple IPC charges including cheating, forgery, criminal intimidation and conspiracy in a property dispute involving alleged usurpation of Waqf land. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the …

VIJAY KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The High Court noted that the police had already filed a charge sheet, as per a report dated 2 May 2026. Since the charge sheet was on record, the court held that the petition, which sought to …

SONU YADAV @ RAJESH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sonu Yadav (alias Rajesh Yadav), filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 …

DEEPAK AND ANOTERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed. The …

SAHAB KHAN @ SAHABUDDIN AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02‑05‑2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a …

MANIRAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Maniram and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 indicating that the …

UDAI PRAKASH PANDEY AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the charge sheet …

SUSHILA DEVI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U P AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …

ANITA KATIYARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Anita Katiyar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against her. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by counsel. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had already been filed, as …

RAJESH PANDEY @ SONU PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rajesh Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …

SACHENDRA SINGH YADAV @ SONU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sachendra Singh Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 5596 of 2023) challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that a charge sheet had …

SACHIN @ SONU TIWARI AND AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The petition was heard in the revised call, with no petitioner present and the State represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court examined an office report dated 2 May …

DEVENDRA PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Devendra Pal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed. The Court …

HEMENDRA SINGH AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The petition was heard in the revised call, with no petitioner present and the State represented by an AGA. The court noted that the charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report …

VIRENDRA MAURYA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court noted that the filing of a charge …

HANS NATH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet in the case had already been filed. The Court noted that once a charge sheet …

DEEPAK SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Deepak Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 5345 of 2022) in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the revised call, with no petitioner present and the State represented by an AGA. The court …

RAJIYA BEJUM AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Rajiya Bejum and six others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that a charge sheet had …

VIJENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vijendra Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that a charge sheet had already been …

SAMEENAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sameea, who was accused under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 for alleged involvement in fake sureties filed on behalf of her son, Rashid. The applicant argued that she merely acted as a parivi (representative) for her son, did not arrange the …

ABDUL RAHMAN AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

In Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 5603 of 2022, Abdul Rahman and five others filed a petition challenging the registration of an FIR against them. The petitioners were not present at the hearing, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court examined a …

AAKANKSHA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police. The Court observed that …

MUMTAZ BEGAUM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Mumtaz Begaum and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, opposed the petition. The court examined an office report dated 02 May 2026 indicating that the charge sheet …

BIJENDRA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a …

AKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Akash filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR against him. The petition was heard before a division bench of the Allahabad High Court, with counsel Vishnu Shankar Mishra representing the petitioner and G.A. for the State. The court noted …

HARSHVARDHAN SINGH AWANAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Harshvardhan Singh Awana filed an application under section 528 of the B.N.S.S. before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the application, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition with more detailed particulars. The court considered the request and found no …

AJAY KATIYAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court …

SANTOSH KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR against them. The petition was heard in the revised call before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that, per a report dated 02‑05‑2026, the charge sheet in the matter had …

ASIFversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Asif, was arrested in connection with a theft allegedly committed using a poisonous substance, and was charged under Sections 317(2), 318(4), 303(2) and 123 BNS of the IPC. He contended that the FIR was lodged against unknown persons, that the allegations against him were false, and …

MUNSARIFversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Munsarif, sought bail in a criminal case (No. 518 of 2025) where he was accused of fraudulently obtaining a KCC loan of Rs.5,00,000 by posing as Shabir Shah and acting as a guarantor. The FIR, filed by a bank manager, alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the …

ANKITversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ankit, who was accused under IPC sections 115(2), 118(1), 109 and 309(5) BNS for allegedly causing knife injuries. The prosecution’s case relied on a later statement of the injured party that named Ankit, whereas the earlier statement did not …

SONU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sonu Yadav, was arrested in connection with a robbery case (Crime No. 208 of 2024) based primarily on the confessional statement of a co-accused, with no other incriminating material recovered from his possession. He has a past criminal record of 28 cases, most of which were concluded …

SHEKHAR BHARDWAJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Shekhar Bhardwaj, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 646 of 2025) alleging extortion and an attempt to fire at an informant, though no injury was caused. He has a prior criminal record of eleven cases, including five under Section 307 IPC, but in those cases no injury …

ABDUL AZIZversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a recovery warrant issued under Section 128 by the Family Court, which was based on a maintenance order of Rs.3,500 per month granted to his wife and two minor children under Section 125. The applicant …

SHANTI DEVIversusBAL KRISHNA TRIPATHI ,D.M.AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a contempt application filed by Shanti Devi after an earlier writ order required the opposite parties to pay dues of the late Laxman Singh. The opposite parties filed a compliance affidavit stating that payments had been made on various dates. The Court examined the …

SANJAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash an ex‑parte maintenance order dated 20‑10‑2014 and a subsequent order dated 06‑11‑2023 that rejected his request to recall the ex‑parte order. He alleged that he was falsely implicated and that his legally wedded wife, the …

NASIRUDDINversusU.P. STATE SUGAR CORPORATION AND OTHERS

The petitioner, a labourer, was disciplined for alleged theft and punished with stoppage of three annual increments on 9 November 1998. He appealed under Clause 'O' of the Standing Order of the Sugar Industry of U.P., but the appellate authority not only disagreed with the disciplinary order but …

RAKESH GUPTA AND 4 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 Others

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants, and only the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The court observed that the application was not prosecuted and …

SMT. PRIYA AGARWALversusDEEPAK GOYAL

The applicant, Smt. Priya Agarwal, filed a transfer application under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Court Rules seeking to transfer the suit against Deepak Goyal. The court observed that the applicant's counsel had not complied with the requisite procedural steps required for such an application. …

MIRZA SALEEM BEG AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Mirza Saleem Beg and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel or parties appeared before the court to argue the application. Consequently, the court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the application. The …

ROHIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rohit Kumar, who is charged under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged fraud and forgery related to a sale deed. The applicant contended that he was only a witness to the deed and had no prior criminal record, …

HARINDRA CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Harindra Chauhan, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A‑1 of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, challenging the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a case involving multiple IPC offences. The appellant did not contest the merits but sought liberty to file a bail …

UMESH CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Umesh Chauhan, filed an appeal under Section 14A‑1 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 27‑11‑2024 and a cognizance order dated 24‑01‑2025 issued by a Special Judge. The appellant alleged that the …

SMT. PRERNA ARORA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Smt. Prerna Arora and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed, but the petitioners failed to appear on the scheduled dates, including the previous hearing on 16‑April‑2026 and the …

MOHD SAIF @ MOHD ANJAAN @ BABLUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mohd Saif, who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely …

TULSI RAMversusD.D.C. RAMPUR AND OTHERS

The petitioners filed applications to substitute the legal heirs of the deceased sole petitioner and to seek condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court found the affidavit explaining the delay satisfactory and allowed the substitution, noting the petitioner as deceased and …

SMT. MAMTA NEHRAversusVEDVIR SINGH

Smt. Mamta Nehra filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 382 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking transfer of the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. The earlier …

SMT. ASHA RANIversusSUBHASH CHAND

The applicant, Smt. Asha Rani, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 140 of 2025 seeking to move the pending suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to prosecute the application. The respondent, Subhash Chand, was represented by counsel Akhtar Ali. The High Court …

MOHD IRFANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Mohd Irfan filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondent bank to release his frozen bank account No. 50200026185212. The petitioner relied on the precedent set by the Lucknow Bench in Khalsa Medical Store v. Reserve Bank of India (Writ‑C No.12211 of 2025). The …

RAHUL YADAV AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order and all proceedings in Criminal Case No. 659 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was …

SOHAN PRASAD RAVANIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sohan Prasad Ravani, who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false …

AMIT MISHRAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, General Secretary of the NUPPL Contract Workers Union, filed a public interest litigation seeking financial assistance and employment for residents of eight villages affected by land acquisition for NUPPL. The respondents argued that the issues of compensation, rehabilitation, and …

VINAY KUMAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioner challenged the selection of three Junior Clerks at the Government Woodcraft Industrial Training Institute, alleging violations of the advertised age limit and procedural rules. The advertisement stipulated a general‑category age limit of 18 to 35 years as of 1 July 2004, yet …

MUNNA PANDEY AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad heard an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Munna Pandey and others. No counsel or parties appeared to prosecute the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The interim order that had been …

SMT. SUNITA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Sunita Devi, filed Writ Petition No. 6984 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The State's standing counsel raised no …

NAVALKISHOR @ NAVAL KISHOR GARGversusSTATE OF U.P.

Navalkishor Garg, an 80‑year‑old man, was charged under several sections of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. Act and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act for allegedly receiving an excess pension of Rs. 22,08,285, of which Rs. 4,96,000 had already been recovered. The applicant filed a second bail …

VIKRAM PATELversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vikram Patel, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Regional Passport Office, Lucknow and the Passport Sewa Kendra, Gorakhpur to issue him a passport. The Court observed that both passport offices are not juristic persons and therefore cannot be the proper …

PRAMOD BAIGAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Pramod Baiga, who was arrested in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended that he …

NITESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Nitesh Kumar, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking to set aside the charge sheet and related orders and, more specifically, to obtain liberty to file a bail application before the trial …

RAVI ALIAS RAVINDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ravi alias Ravindra Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued on 18‑Oct‑2024 in a trial for offences under Sections 307 and 504 IPC. The High Court examined the procedural …

ROBINA KHATOONversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Robina Khatoon filed a petition under Article 227 seeking supervisory intervention over a pending trial court case (Complaint Case No.984 of 2021). The petitioner later requested that the petition be treated as withdrawn, but asked the High Court to direct the trial court to decide the …

ABID HUSSSAIN AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief in the High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The interim order previously …

RITESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Ritesh Kumar Srivastav challenged a summoning order dated 5 June 2025 issued by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Varanasi, which had proceeded against him under Sections 504 and 506 IPC and Sections 3(1)(da) and 3(1)(dha) of the SC/ST Act. The complaint alleged caste‑based abuse linked …

AJAY MOHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Ajay Mohan, was charged under the POCSO Act and several sections of the B.N.S. for offences arising from case crime no. 323 of 2025. He filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order, and the entire Special Case No.120 of 2025, …

JAYANT GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court observed that once a charge sheet is filed, …

RUQAIYA BEGUM @ SHEELAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ruqaiya Begum @ Sheela filed a bail cancellation application (No. 316 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Mohd. Samiuzzaman Khan, failed to appear on multiple occasions, including the revised call. The State, represented by AGA Satyendra Tiwari, was present. The Court …

SYED MOHAMMAD AJAJUL HASANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the charge sheet …

SURESH SHAH SISODIYAversusJAI PRAKASH YADAV

The plaintiff, Suresh Shah Sisodiya, who became landlord of a tenanted premises in 2008, filed an eviction suit in the Small Cause Court alleging rent arrears and seeking possession. The defendant tenant denied the landlord's title, presenting a competing chain of title. The trial court found a …

SMT. REENAversusGAURAV SHARMA

The applicant, Smt. Reena, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 162 of 2025 seeking to move the pending suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to prosecute the application. The respondent, Gaurav Sharma, was represented by counsel. The court examined whether the …

GOPAL PRASAD GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash charge‑sheet No. 1019 of 2018 in State v. Gopal Prasad Goswami and others, which alleged offences under various IPC and IT Act provisions. The High Court examined the material and held that, at the …

RAJESH MISHRA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

On 21 April 2026 the Allahabad High Court listed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Rajesh Mishra and two others against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The court issued an interim order and directed the matter to be listed in ordinary course. When the case was …

MOHAMMAD NAZIMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Mohammad Nazim, who was implicated in a case under the Cow Slaughter and Prevention Act, 1955 (sections 3, 5Ka, 5Kha, 8) and IPC sections 427 and 307. The FIR dated …

SMT. DEEPALI @ DEEPALI BHARGAV AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Smt. Deepali @ Deepali Bhargav and two others, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Jitendra Pratap Singh and Sunil Vashisth, later moved that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn. The court considered the request …

REEMA VERMAversusDR. ARVIND KUMAR CHAUDHARY

The applicant, Reema Verma, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The opposite party, Dr. Arvind Kumar Chaudhary, was represented by counsel. The court noted the lack of …

SMT. GUNJAN MANI TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Smt. Gunjan Mani Tripathi filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18‑02‑2026 of the District Basic Education Officer directing that respondent No. 5 be appointed officiating Headmaster of Composite Vidyalaya, Deoria, and that the petitioner hand over the charge. The petitioner contended …

KUSUMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Ms. Ifrah Islam, who is charged under Sections 124(1), 80(2), 85 BNS and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act for allegedly setting the deceased on fire. The applicant argued that the dying declaration against her is unreliable because the …

SMT KIRAN SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt Kiran Singh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Director General of Police's Legal Cell, submitted a report indicating that a charge sheet had already been …

ANKISH TRIPATHI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ankish Tripathi and others filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the FIR in Crime No. 0024 of 2025, alleging that no charge sheet had been filed. The court examined the police’s office report dated 27 April 2026, which indicated that a charge sheet (CS‑145/25) had indeed …

RAJENDRA SINGH GURJARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rajendra Singh Gurjar, filed a short‑term bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.208 of 2014) involving multiple IPC offences. The application was sought to enable the applicant to attend his daughter's marriage. After the marriage was solemnized, the applicant’s counsel …

DHIRAJ SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Dhiraj Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 5355 of 2025) in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others, opposed the petition. The petition was heard in the …

RIYAJUDDIN ALIAS RAJUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Riyajuddin Alias Raju, filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an order dated 24 April 2023 passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Deoria, in a Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance proceeding. The impugned order had unilaterally accepted …

SURAJ PASWAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Suraj Paswan and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Director General of Police, submitted a report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed. The Court …

SHAUKAT KURANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shaukat Kuran, who was arrested in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant contended that co‑accused had already been released on bail, no beef or other material was seized …

MAHESH PRASAD RAJAK AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Mahesh Prasad Rajak and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Advocate General, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed against the …

VINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant Vinod Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a POCSO case alleging offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 506, 376 and POCSO sections 6/8. The applicant asserted that he had married the victim in 2017, that two …

SURJEET SINGH @ BILLAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Surjeet Singh (Billar Singh), filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Advocate General, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed against the …

BHAGWAN PASWAN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR, alleging impropriety. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed against the …

RUPESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Rupesh Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 36 of 2026) involving offences under sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 340(2) of the B.N.S. and section 66 of the Income Tax Act. He claimed false implication and pointed to the fact that co‑accused Saloni Yadav and Suraj Kumar Tiwari, who …

MAHENDRA JAISWAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners Mahendra Jaiswal and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating …

ALOK KUMAR DUBEY AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Alok Kumar Dubey and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR against them. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others, were represented by the Additional Government Advocate. The High Court examined the office …

JADUNATH AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The petition was heard in the revised call, with no petitioner present and the State represented by an AGA. The court noted that the charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report …

ANKIT RAJPOOTversusSRI AJAY CHAUHAN, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

The applicant, Ankit Rajpoot, filed a contempt application against the Principal Secretary, Sri Ajay Chauhan, alleging non‑compliance with an order of the writ court. The applicant's counsel, Daya Shankar Srivastava, submitted that the writ court order had been fully complied with. The learned judge …

MOHAN SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Mohan Sharma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 challenging the registration of an FIR by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was filed after the police had already filed a charge sheet in the matter, as indicated by a report from the Director …

BRIJ GOPAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSHRI RANVIR SINGH AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Brij Gopal and two others, filed a civil contempt application alleging that the respondents had failed to comply with a writ order. The respondents were served with a contempt notice. Counsel for the applicants, Rajeev Giri, submitted that the writ order had in fact been complied …

SMT. PRACHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Prachi and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed …

SHALIGRAMversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Shaligram filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The petition was filed after the police had already filed a charge sheet, as indicated by a report dated 02.05.2026 from the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police, Uttar …