Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 11201–11400

ARPITA SINGHversusRAM SUCHIT SINGH

The applicant, Arpita Singh, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 185 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The Court also vacated any …

SMT. ANU GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Anu Gupta, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that once a charge …

SHRI AMIT GARGversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shri Amit Garg, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The High Court noted that the charge sheet had already been filed by the police, as per the report dated 02.05.2026. Since the charge sheet was on record, the Court held that the writ …

M/S EFFICIENT DISTRIBUTORS P LTDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

M/S Efficient Distributors P Ltd filed a writ petition challenging an order that granted a 90% waiver after a part‑waiver was allowed by the first appellate authority. The Assistant Chief Secretary (ACSC) raised a preliminary objection that the petition was not maintainable because the petitioner …

SHAFIQ ALAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 341, 354, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was verified by the …

UMA SHANKAR AND 16 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police. The Court observed …

AMIR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Amir and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 2 May 2026 …

NAFEES MISTRI ALIAS NAFEES KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Nafees Mistri, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the …

KAILASH LODHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 for Kailash Lodhi, who had been in custody since November 2017 for alleged offences under Sections 396 and 412 IPC. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the recovery was false, and that no identification …

RAVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravi, who was charged under Section 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 25 and 28 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at police during an attempted arrest, though no police officer was injured. Ravi claimed the weapon and cartridge …

JITENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, but no counsel appeared to prosecute the application. The court noted the absence of any party to press the matter and consequently dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The interim order …

SURENDRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners claimed rights over plot 545/2 based on possession and filed an objection under Section 122‑B(4‑F) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. Their objection was rejected in 1997, but an appeal before the Settlement Officer Consolidation was allowed in July 1999. …

SMT. GUNJAN KUMARI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed against the accused. The …

RAMESHversusJAIKARAN AND6 OTHERS

The applicant filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. No further steps were taken by the applicant to pursue the application. The court observed that there was no appearance by the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the transfer application was …

JYOTIDEVI JIYALAL PATEL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 3461/2025) arising from a charge sheet under Sections 108 BNSS and 3/4 of the D.P. Act, and to stay the cognizance order dated 23.10.2025. The applicants contended that they had no …

JAI KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Jai Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The court noted that a notice to the informant was served on 06.03.2026, but the informant failed to appear. The primary issue before the court was whether bail should be …

JAFRUDDIN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief in a criminal matter. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The interim order …

BALVEER SAHAI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 628 of 2019) filed under Sections 406 and 506 IPC. A settlement between the parties was reached on 26 May 2022 and later verified by the Judicial Magistrate on 25 June …

HARISHCHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant sought to quash the order dated 01‑07‑2025 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Azamgarh, which had rejected his earlier application under Section 319 CrPC to summon a third accused, Harikesh, who had not been charge‑sheeted. The matter arose from an NCR filed in 2009 involving offences …

M/S. HINDUSTAN PAPER MACHINERY INDUSTRIESversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

M/S Hindustan Paper Machinery Industries filed a writ petition challenging the revenue's order dated 22‑12‑2025, alleging denial of a hearing, lack of reasons for adverse findings, and non‑disclosure of Records Used During Investigation (RUDs). The Court noted that similar grounds had been raised in …

SATYAM SHIVHAREversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Satyam Shivhare, was arrested in connection with a violent incident in Banda district where the deceased was allegedly beaten by a co‑accused identified as Yuvraj. The FIR does not name the applicant, and evidence such as a shop‑owner’s statement and CCTV footage suggest the applicant …

AZHAR UDDINversusSTATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND 2 OTHERS

The writ petition filed by Azhar Uddin in 2021 remained pending and was listed among the oldest cases for priority hearing. The court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be taken up and warned that non‑appearance would lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s …

SHIVAM @ PRAVEEN MODANWALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Shivam @ Praveen Modanwal, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. He argued that he had been falsely …

PHOOL CHANDRAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Phool Chandra challenged an order dated 22‑12‑2025 issued by the revenue, alleging denial of a hearing, lack of reasons, and non‑provision of records used for determination (RUDs). The Court referred to its earlier order in M/S Shankar Trading Company v. Union of India, which set …

SMT.RUCHIversusASHISH MAHESHWARI

The applicant, Smt. Ruchi, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 574 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. …

CHHAIL BIHARIversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Chhail Bihari filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Regional Passport Officer, Ghaziabad, to renew his passport, which had been withheld on the ground of a pending criminal case. The Court noted that, per its earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar (2024), the mere …

VINITAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Vinita filed a writ petition in 2021 which remained pending without any appearance by her counsel. The High Court had issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard promptly and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel …

UMED SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Umed Singh, challenged the tax adjudicating authority's order dated 22 December 2025 on grounds of denial of a hearing, lack of reasons for decisions, and non‑disclosure of RUDs before the conclusion of proceedings. The Court noted that similar factual circumstances existed in the …

M/S. DIVYA LAXMI TRADING AND CO.versusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, M/s. Divya Laxmi Trading & Co., challenged the revenue's order dated 22‑12‑2025 on grounds that it denied them a hearing, failed to provide Reasoned Unexplained Documents (RUDs) before adjudication, and relied on questionable material. The High Court noted that similar issues had …

RAJESH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rajesh Kumar Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 18‑08‑2025 and a cognizance order dated 13‑01‑2025 issued by the Additional Civil Judge/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mau. He contended that the offences …

GANGA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The writ petition filed by Ganga Singh against the State of U.P. and others remained pending since 2021. The High Court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and dismissed if the parties failed to appear or indicate that the cause of action survived. Neither the petitioner’s …

PRIYA (CORPUS) AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Amit Kumar, filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that the corpus, Priya, was being unlawfully detained and forced to cohabit with him. The court ordered the father, Rajendra Yadav, to produce Priya, who testified that she has never married Amit Kumar and only maintains a …

ANJU TIWARI (CORPUS) AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that Anju Tiwari, a friend of petitioner Jitendra Rai, was being held in illegal custody by Ajay Tiwari, a respondent. Respondent Ajay Tiwari countered that Anju Tiwari is his legally wedded wife and resides with him voluntarily, supporting …

JAI NATH AND ANTOHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the State to delete its name from the revenue record for Plot No. 161 (2.90 acres) and to record the petitioners' name. The respondents argued that the entry had already been rectified and that the petitioners must follow the procedure laid down in …

M/S SHUBHRA MOTEL PRIVATE LIMITEDversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

M/S Shubhra Motel Private Limited filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The respondents submitted that an earlier order of the same Court had rendered the petition infructuous. The petitioner did not contest this submission. The Court accepted the respondents’ claim that the …

UPENDRA KUMAR PRAJAPATI ALIAS RAJAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Upendra Kumar Prajapati, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 6711 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel stated that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the petition and seeks to withdraw it. The respondent's Additional …

HASEENversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Haseen under Sections 143(4) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. in Crime No. 35 of 2025. The allegation against Haseen was that he facilitated the transfer of a victim from a Delhi bus‑stand to co‑accused, who later married her, with no claim of physical or …

MASTER AYUSH (MINOR) AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, Master Ayush (a minor) and his mother Sunita Devi, filed a habeas corpus petition against the State of U.P. and others, alleging unlawful detention. The petitioners' counsel informed the court that the minor and his mother were now residing with Dharmendra Kumar, the husband of …

PRINCEversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Prince, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 321 of 2025 under sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated based on a solitary base case and that he …

AMAR CHANDANIversusSTATE OF U.P AND ANOTHER

The applicant Amar Chandani and co‑applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (case No. 347/2021) instituted under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 377 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. They asserted that a …

HEERA LAL CHANDRA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Heera Lal Chandra and four co‑applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. The court was asked to entertain the application and pass appropriate orders. The primary …

NATHILAL RATHORE @ BHOLE GIRIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Nathilal Rathore, sought bail in a case under Sections 307 and 504 IPC, claiming he was falsely implicated and that the injury to the victim was minor, occurring on a non‑vital part of the body. He alleged a prior grievance where the victim had killed his son, leading to earlier …

RICHA SAHAIversusHIMANSHU SHRIVASTAVA

The applicant, Richa Sahai, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 243 of 2025 seeking to move the proceedings to another court. The respondent, Himanshu Shrivastava, was served with the application. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to argue or prosecute the transfer request. The …

MANDHEER NISHAD AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mandheer Nishad and six others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Civil Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants expressed a desire to withdraw the application while retaining the right to file a fresh petition. The …

UPENDRA NATH RAIversusDISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS AND 2 OTHERS

The appellant, Upendra Nath Rai, filed a special appeal against the District Inspector of Schools and two others. No party appeared to press the appeal, and only the State's standing counsel was present. The High Court held that the appeal could not proceed without prosecution and dismissed it. …

JAGDISH NARAYAN AGNIHOTRIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a former headmaster of a government‑aided junior high school, retired on 30 June 2007 and claimed a gratuity of Rs 3,33,314, of which he had already received Rs 1,07,098. He filed a writ petition seeking the balance of Rs 2,26,616 with interest, alleging that the authorities had not …

MAHENDRA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Mahendra Sharma filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 6735 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Pankaj Satsangi, announced at the Bar that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the petition and seeks to withdraw it. The learned Additional Government …

ANURAG SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Anurag Srivastava filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 6572 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petition was presented by counsel Rajnish Kumar Srivastava and Siddharth Srivastava, while the respondents were represented by …

SAJJAD KHAN @ SAJJAD AHMAD AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel announced that they do not wish to pursue the petition and requested its withdrawal. The Attorney General for the State and the counsel for the third …

GOLDEN SAHNIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Golden Sahni, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against him by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The State informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed. The petitioner did not …

SANDEEP SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sandeep Singh and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Pramod Kumar, announced that the petitioners no longer wished to pursue the …

SNEHA VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Mrs. Mamta Guragain, appearing for petitioner Sneha Verma, sought a family member certificate required to claim a family pension and a compassionate appointment after the death of her husband, who was her second marriage. The petitioner had earlier filed Writ A No. 10239 of 2025, which was disposed …

VIKAS THAKURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Vikas Thakur filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and seek liberty to file a fresh petition with better …

ZAINUL AABEDEEN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Zainul Aabedeen and two others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 6695 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The State's Additional Government Advocate and counsel for respondent …

TAYUB @ TAIYAB MASOOD AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the police investigation was complete and the report had been submitted. The petitioners did not contest these facts but …

UDAY BHAN DIXIT AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under the inherent powers of the High Court to quash Criminal Case No. 17162 of 2007, which involved charges under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had amicably reconciled, executed a verified compromise deed, and the trial court had confirmed the …

KUNDAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Petitioner Kundan Singh filed a writ petition seeking (a) a certiorari to quash an order dated 10 June 2010 and (b) a mandamus directing that he be allowed to continue in a Class III post with salary until the petition is decided. The petition was filed in the Allahabad High Court. During the …

PIYUSH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Piyush Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant, through counsel Mehul Khare, sought to withdraw the application and requested liberty to file a fresh application with more detailed particulars and pleadings. The …

MEER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Meer Singh, challenged a final assessment order dated 9 May 2025 that imposed liability for alleged theft of electricity. He had earlier filed a reply on 16 January 2025 contesting the assessment, but the assessing authority considered only the fact that the connection was domestic …

ANIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Anil Kumar, filed a writ petition challenging a suspension order dated 29 July 2010. The respondent State filed a counter‑affidavit stating that the disciplinary proceedings had concluded on 19 November 2010, exonerating the petitioner on two charges and finding indiscipline on only …

RAVI SHANKAR PANDEY AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ravi Shankar Pandey and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the continuation of proceedings after the police investigation had been completed and a report filed. The State of Uttar Pradesh, through its Additional Government …

AMAR SINGHversusOMPAL

Amar Singh filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 258 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to have the suit transferred. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The Court observed that the application was not prosecuted and therefore dismissed it for …

AMIT @ BHOLA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 7456 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) raised no objection. The court considered the …

NEERAJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner Neeraj Kumar filed a writ petition in 2016 before the Allahabad High Court. The case remained pending for several years and was listed among the oldest cases for priority hearing. The court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be taken up and warned that non‑appearance …

RAM LALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Ram Lal filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of his application for regularisation of service and sought a certiorari and mandamus. He later died on 19‑11‑2014. A substitution application was filed in 2017 but the State respondents did not file a reply. The Court examined whether a …

SAURABHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15592 of 2025) filed by Saurabh against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. No counsel appeared for the applicant, while the State's learned A.G.A. was present. The trial court's status report …

AMIT KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 19279 of 2024) that involved offences under the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, arising from a matrimonial dispute. The parties had earlier settled the dispute through mediation at the …

AJAY CHAHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant, Ajay Chahar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a recovery warrant issued by the Family Court, Mathura, under Section 144(3) BNSS for non‑payment of maintenance ordered in a Section 125 Cr.P.C. case. He contended that the maintenance amount of …

RAJVEER AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of Session Trial No. 88 of 2023, which involved offences under IPC sections 323, 324, 504, 506, 308 and 325. Earlier, the High Court had directed the parties to obtain a court‑verified compromise, which they did, and the …

BACHCHU SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, including Bachchu Singh, challenged the denial of their promotion to Head Constable on the ground that their promotion files were kept in sealed cover due to pending criminal proceedings for cheating and forgery. They relied on a prior order (Writ A No.15474 of 2024) and the …

DEVENDRA KUMAR SHARMAversusMAHARAJ SUKHPAL VASUDEV SHARMA AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Devendra Kumar Sharma, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the case, subsequent developments occurred that, in the petitioner's view, eliminated any surviving cause of action. The petitioner, through counsel J.P. Pandey, requested that the …

JAINESH MISHRA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Jainesh Mishra and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an ongoing criminal proceeding. The State of U.P. informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 12-10-2025. The …

MOHD. ISHAQUEversusWAQF MASJID KATRA ABDUL GANI NO. 66 FATEHPUR

Mohd. Ishaque filed a writ petition against Waqf Masjid Katra Abdul Gani No. 66, Fatehpur. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The Court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the petition. The interim order previously granted was vacated. The dismissal was …

RAM KUMAR AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for hearing and did not seek any adjournment. The Court noted the absence of effective representation and held that the cause of action had become stale due to the passage of time. Consequently, the petition was …

MONTI @ RAVIRAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Monti @ Raviraj Singh filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7399 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three others. During the hearing, the Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that more serious charges had been added to the …

MOHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Mohan Singh excavated soil to level his agricultural land. The District Magistrate imposed a Rs 5,00,000 penalty under U.P. Minor Mineral (Concession) Rules, 2021, which was confirmed by the Commissioner. Singh contended that the excavation was merely soil removal, exempt under a 2018 Government …

YASHODHARA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Yashodhara Devi, challenged the cancellation of her appointment as Anganwadi Karyakartri after a fresh inquiry re‑classified her from BPL to APL. Initially appointed in 2011 based on a BPL certificate, a subsequent inquiry alleged she did not belong to the BPL category, leading to …

VIJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Vijay Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking a stay of the order dated 02.07.2025 of the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act concerning a dishonoured cheque. The applicant contended …

SOHANI SINGHversusSRI GOPAL KRISHNA GUPTA

The applicant, Sohani Singh, filed a transfer application under Section 24 of the CPC seeking to move a matrimonial suit (Case No. 379 of 2019) filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act from the Family Court in Moradabad to the Family Court in Kanpur Nagar. She alleged that she was forced out …

M/S S.K. WHEAT PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

M/S S.K. Wheat Products Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, later expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and not press it further. The State respondents, represented by standing counsel, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The …

SHIVAM @ SHUBHAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The Additional Government Advocate and counsel for the respondents raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, …

RUPWATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioner Rupwati filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The investigation in the underlying matter had already been concluded, and a final report favoring the accused respondents had been …

SATYAPAL YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners Satyapal Yadav and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7403 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they no longer wished to pursue the present …

BADAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Badan Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the development authority to pay compensation of Rs.9,000 per square meter for acquired land. The respondent, represented by counsel, submitted that the compensation award had already been finalized and paid, and that any …

SWETA GAUTAMversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Sweta Gautam filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7342 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings of a criminal investigation in which a charge sheet had already been filed against her. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the …

SHUBHAM MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shubham Mishra, filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the State respondents to conduct a spot inspection of alleged illegal mining activities and to cancel the lease granted to a third respondent. The petition relied on photographs showing mining after dark. The …

ZAKIRversusSTATE OF U.P.

Zakir was arrested in connection with a murder after the victim's body was recovered and a spade was allegedly found at his residence. The applicant sought bail under Sections 103(1), 140(1) and 238 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arguing that there was no incriminating material against him and …

SHARDA GUPTA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they wished to withdraw the petition. The respondent's counsel and the Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the …

RAM KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Ram Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceeding and summoning order dated 5 January 2026 in a POCSO case (Mahesh Chandra v. Ram Kumar) pending before the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Special Judge (POCSO), Farrukhabad. …

AMIT KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Amit Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to pay post‑retrials benefits of Rs 12,88,9333/- to the legal heir of the deceased employee, along with interest at 12% per annum from the date of death. The High Court …

SMT KAMLESH VERRMA AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UPAND 3 OTHERS

Smt. Kamlesh Verma and three others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petition was listed in Court No. 32 and was heard by Hon'ble Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery. Counsel for the petitioners was …

JAI KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jai Kumar, who was charged with gang‑rape, video‑recording of the act, and offences under the IPC, POCSO Act and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused and a co‑accused raped the victim, recorded the act …

ANKIT @ SHASHIKANT TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ankit @ Shashikant Tiwari, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case where he was alleged to have opened fire on an informant, though no injury was reported. The applicant argued that the allegation was false, the investigation was pending, and his …

UDAIVEER SINGH SOLANKI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners Udaiveer Singh Solanki and another filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 14851 of 2023) against the State of U.P. and others, but no petitioner appeared before the court. The standing counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petition should be disposed of in accordance with the Full …

NRIPENDRA SINGH PHAUGATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The writ petition filed by Nripendra Singh Phaugat was dismissed because the petitioner failed to appear before the court, even after a revised call. No arguments or evidence were presented. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for default. Any interim order that had been granted earlier …

C/M DUNKA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, C/M Dunka Junior High School, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 60327 of 2015) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition was filed after a considerable lapse of time. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the delay rendered the petition infructuous. …

robin sainiversussmt.soonali saini

Robin Saini filed an appeal against Smt. Soonali Saini in the Allahabad High Court. The appellant's counsel failed to appear for the hearing, and even after a revised call, no appearance was made. The court, noting the non‑appearance, dismissed the appeal on the ground of want of prosecution. No …

JYOTI SINGHversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Jyoti Singh filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 5506 of 2024) seeking to quash an advertisement and to have a representation dated 09‑02‑2023 decided. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the representation had already been decided by the respondents, …

MANOJ KUMARversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Manoj Kumar, challenged an order of suspension dated 07.04.2025 issued by the Principal of Government Industrial Training Institute, Azamgarh, on the ground that it was based on a complaint of sexual harassment. The petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking …

ASISH MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Asish Mishra, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed but no party appeared to press the matter. The learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents was present. The Court observed that there was no prosecution of the petition and …

KISHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Kishan Singh, who was accused of offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 351(3) of the IPC. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, that the alleged …

YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The writ petition filed by Yogendra Kumar Srivastava in 2017 remained pending for several years. The High Court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and warned of dismissal if parties failed to appear or indicate that the cause of action survived. Neither the petitioner’s …

OMWATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Omwati filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to allot plot no. 9 in Sector 16B of the Sikandra Yojna, Agra, and to prevent its allotment to anyone else. The petition relied on a pending Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 25398 of 2004 filed by another applicant, Ashok Kumar …

VIJAY KUMAR GUPTAversusSMT. RINKY GUPTA

The petitioner, Vijay Kumar Gupta, filed a petition before the Allahabad High Court under Article 227. He later sought permission to withdraw the petition while retaining the right to pursue other legal remedies. The learned counsel submitted a request for withdrawal. The Court considered the …

CHANDAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by Chandan Singh, who was implicated in a case (Crime No. 931 of 2018) involving alleged offences under Sections 409, 417, 120‑B IPC and 66‑C of the IT Act, arising from a complaint under the …

Alka @ Nishtha JaiswalversusSagar Jaiswal

Alka @ Nishtha Jaiswal filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 745 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. The applicant's counsel, Manoj Kumar Dwivedi and Rakesh Kumar Tripathi, did not appear to press the application. The opposite party, Sagar Jaiswal, was …

PRINCE KUMAR @ CHHOTUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Prince Kumar @ Chhotu in connection with FIR No. 266 of 2025 alleging illegal mining and offences under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 109(1), 132, 3(5) of the BNS and the Prevention of Damages to …

DEEPAK KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The writ petition filed by Deepak Kumar and another in 2017 remained pending for several years. The court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither petitioner’s counsel appeared nor was the case marked to show …

SMT SHAYDA HASHMI AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, led by Smt. Shayda Hashmi, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS and Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to stay the execution of a decree and the continuation of criminal proceedings in case No. 9641/2021, which involved charges under Sections 406, 504, …

ATUL MATHUR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The case titled Atul Mathur and Another versus State of U.P. and Another was filed as an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, bearing BNSS No. 14903 of 2026, before Justice Saurabh Srivastava of the Allahabad High Court. The applicants were represented by counsel Rakesh …

CHANDRABHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 12457 of 2026) filed by Chandrabhan against the State of U.P. was listed before the Hon’ble Justice Vivek Varma. The applicant was represented by counsel G.S. Chauhan and the opposite party by G.A. and Haya Rizvi. No factual or evidentiary …

ANITA DEVIversusJOGINDRA KUMAR AND ANOTHER

Anita Devi filed a civil contempt application (No. 2380 of 2026) against Jogindra Kumar and another, alleging non-compliance with a writ court order. The applicant was represented by counsel Mohitosh Singh. The respondent's counsel was not listed. The learned judge observed that the applicant's …

FAROOQ AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Farooq Ahmad filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 19‑April‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 12‑June‑2025 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur, in a case arising from alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 351(3) and …

SADANANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Sadanand filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking modification of an interim maintenance order dated 07‑01‑2026, which required him to pay Rs.800 per month to the respondent (Defendant No. 2). He contended that the order was unjust because his …

SATYAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Satyam Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a summons issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The applicant argued that the dispute is essentially a money dispute …

PARVEJ AALAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the petitioner Parvej Aalam who was arrested in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act (GAAPA). The petitioner claimed innocence, argued that …

SUSHIL KUMAR KATIYARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sushil Kumar Katiyar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No.11258/2025, which alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 324 and 506, and also sought bail. The High Court examined the material and held that the allegations disclose …

HARENDRA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Harendra Sharma filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 17‑07‑2025 and a Family Court order dated 31‑05‑2025 that directed him to pay maintenance arrears to his estranged wife and her minor son. He contended that the …

VARSHA TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Varsha Tiwari, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a notice dated 03.11.2025 issued by the Executive Magistrate/Assistant Police Commissioner under Section 130 of the BNSS, as well as the entire proceeding of case no. 1140 of 2025 under Sections 126/135 …

SHIV PUJAN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 12 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shiv Pujan and four others, filed a writ petition (Writ No. 17378 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Chandra Shekhar Singh, informed the court that the petition had become infructuous, meaning there was no longer any relief to be granted. The court considered …

SHABNAM @ SUMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shabnam @ Suman, who was charged under Sections 108, 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant contended that the death was a suicide by hanging, with no evidence of her instigating or aiding the act, and cited …

SANJAY BOBBY DESHWALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sanjay Bobby Deshwal under Section 482 of the CrPC in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 19 of 2024). The FIR alleged that the applicant, a landlord, was linked to a fraudulent transaction involving Rs. 57,89,776 transferred to …

VIVEK ALIAS KAMAL SINGH SHYORANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The revisionist, Vivek alias Kamal Singh Shyoran, challenged the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate refusing his discharge in a case arising from an FIR lodged by Block Pramukh Santosh Devi, alleging blackmail and threats. He contended that the FIR was false, that the informant’s …

RAHUL SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rahul Singh Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order and the charge‑sheet in State v. Jyoti Yadav (Case No. 6164 of 2025) which alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant …

VIJAY AND 2 ORSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 23372 of 2018) filed under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504 and 506. They asserted that the parties had amicably settled the dispute by a compromise dated 2 …

KAPILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Kapil, who had been in custody since October 2020 for alleged murder under IPC Sections 302 and 34. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had been …

SAKET GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Saket Gupta, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS and Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a stay of the criminal proceedings (Criminal Revision No. 5294/2021 and Criminal Re‑examination No. 270/2024) pending a possible settlement between the parties. The …

MOHAMMAD NAFISversusSMT. MANOO DEVI

The petitioner, a landlord, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Kanpur to dispose of a pending rent case (No. 01 of 2012) within a stipulated period. The petitioner highlighted that the case, instituted on 10 January …

MOHAMMAD NAFISversusSMT KAMALA DEVI DIED AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, a landlord, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Kanpur Nagar to decide a pending rent case (Rent Case No. 09 of 2012) within a stipulated period. The petitioner alleged undue hardship due to repeated adjournments since the …

RISHIKESH PATEL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged the Tehsildar’s order rejecting their mutation application based on a 2014 registered gift deed, claiming the deed contained a testamentary clause that should vest the remaining property in them. The respondents, daughters of the deceased tenure holder, argued that the …

PUSHPENDRA DEV @ TALLIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Pushpendra Dev, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. The court directed the applicant to deposit a fine of Rs.5,000 as a condition for bail. Counsel for the applicant complied and deposited the fine on 30 April 2026. Upon receipt of the …

SAHIL VERMA @ MOHIT VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahil Verma (also known as Mohit Verma) in a criminal case (Crime No.210 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1), 351(3) of the IPC and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the …

SMT. NANKI DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants, Smt. Nanki Devi and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the order dated 21 February 2026 passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge (Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption Act) in Kanpur Nagar. The impugned order had allowed a …

NEETESH JATAV @ NITESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Neetesh Jatav, who alleged false implication in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Gangster Act. The applicant argued that he was on bail in related gang‑chart cases, that the gang leader …

PREMPAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 06‑05‑2025 and the entire criminal proceeding (Complaint Case No. 408 of 2018) pending before the Judicial Magistrate‑I, Budaun. They alleged that no offence was disclosed against them and …

JITENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Jitendra, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a criminal case involving alleged offences under Sections 117(1), 126(2), 110, 191(3), 191(2) and 190 of the IPC. While the application was pending, the applicant’s counsel sought to withdraw the …

SANJU @ SANJAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Sanju alias Sanjay Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 9281 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State was represented by Additional Government Advocate Anil Kumar Mishra. The …

DR. ASEEM KUMAR OJHAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Dr. Aseem Kumar Ojha, a surplus doctor, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to pay his salary/honorarium from October 2016 and to allow him to sign the attendance register. He had previously filed a similar petition in 2017, which was disposed by a Division …

SHYAM NARAIN YADAVversusTHE DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS AND ANOTHER

Shyam Narain Yadav filed a special appeal before the Allahabad High Court against the District Inspector of Schools. The respondent's counsel submitted an illness slip, but the appellant failed to appear for the hearing, even after a revised call. The court noted the appellant's non-appearance as a …

AJAY KUMAR @ TINKUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ajay Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to set aside a charge-sheet order dated 17‑08‑2023 and a subsequent bail‑warrant order dated 20‑11‑2025 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Garotha, Jhansi. The applicant argued that …

KRISHNversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in connection with multiple charges including Sections 191, 190, 61, 109, 130, 115, 352, 351, 324, 110 of the BNSS and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel sought to …

SARIFUNNISHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a stay of the criminal proceedings and bail, challenging a cognizance order and a non‑bailable warrant dated 29‑05‑2018 and a non‑bailable warrant dated 13‑02‑2026. The court examined the allegations, noting …

RAMA ALIAS RAHULversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rama alias Rahul, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

SHAHZAD @ BULLETversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Shahzad @ Bullet, who is charged under Sections 331(4), 317(2) and 305 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that …

SAURABH @ KARIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the applicant Saurabh @ Kariya who was charged under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant argued that he was …

ABHISHEK SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Abhishek Sharma, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of a pending criminal case (Case No. 87503 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 504, 323, 406 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Domestic Violence Protection …

SADDAM HUSSAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Saddam Hussain, who was charged under Section 70(2) of the BNS Act, Sections 5(g)/6 of the POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(5) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for an alleged outraging of modesty that was …

HIMANSHUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Himanshu, who claimed false implication in an FIR alleging assault with lathi‑danda and iron rod. The applicant, who has three prior criminal cases (two pending, one resulting in conviction), sought …

OMPALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bihar Narcotic and Smuggling Act (BNSS) by the accused Ompal in a case involving alleged assault with lathi-danda resulting in injuries. The applicant claimed false implication and sought bail to …

DILSHADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dilshad in a case under Sections 137(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and 87 of the B.N.S., alleging abduction of a 15‑year‑old girl. The applicant’s counsel argued that the victim, a major, had been mischaracterised as a minor and that her …

SUNEELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Suneel filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside an order dated 23‑02‑2024 of the Special Judge (Essential Commodities Act) that allowed Criminal Revision No. 252/2022 (Shaukeen v. Suneel & others), and also to set aside an order dated 21‑10‑2022 of the Sub‑Divisional …

AKSHAT SINGHALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Akshat Singlar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑framing order dated 24‑02‑2024 and the summoning order dated 17‑01‑2024 in a Session Trial under Section 307 IPC. The applicant argued that a discharge application he had …

AVNEET KAUR AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The respondents' counsel raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after noting …

CHANDRAKESHAV PRASAD MISHRAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Chandrakeshav Prasad Mishra filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (S.D.) Mirzapur to expedite the pending complaint case No. 659/2023 filed under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner argued that the complaint, filed …

ABDUL HAMEED AND 2 OTHERSversusSMT. NAFEESA FATIMA AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Abdul Hameed and others filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge, Court No. 6, Bareilly, to decide a stay application dated 05.07.2025 that was pending in Civil Appeal No. 33 of 2024. The sole relief sought was for the High Court to expedite …

SUSHIL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sushil and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They later prayed for dismissal of the present petition, seeking liberty to file a fresh writ petition with better averments and documents. The request was not opposed by the counsel for respondents No.2 and …

DR. SHWETA GUPTAversusDR. ABHIJAT KUMAR

Dr. Shweta Gupta filed Transfer Application No. 802 of 2022 seeking transfer of a suit. The applicant later informed the court that, due to subsequent developments, the cause of action no longer existed and she did not wish to pursue the matter. The opposite party, Dr. Abhijat Kumar, expressed no …

KUNALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Kunal, who is charged in Crime No. 58 of 2026 under Sections 123, 61(2), 305(A) and 317 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming …

SMT RUPALI DWIVEDIversusNAVNEET KUMAR DWIVEDI

The High Court of Allahabad heard an appeal by Smt. Rupali Dwivedi against a trial court order that granted her husband, Navneet Kumar Dwivedi, a divorce. The appellant was not contesting the divorce itself but sought maintenance, which the trial court had not awarded. The court observed that …

DR. ANAND BABU AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Dr. Anand Babu and ten other petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was heard by Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery. The court disposed of the petition, directing reference to the detailed order in the case of …

YATISH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Yatish Singh, appointed as a Shramik in 1988, discovered that his date of birth recorded in his service book (19‑Oct‑1967) had been overwritten to 14‑Apr‑1966, which would accelerate his retirement. The respondents ordered his retirement on 30‑Apr‑2026 based on a 2005 Transfer Certificate …

SAURABHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Saurabh, who was arrested in a NDPS case (Sections 8/20) for allegedly possessing 7.41 g of smack. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the quantity was below …

M/S SHAKAR TRADING COMPANYversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

M/s Shankar Trading Company challenged a penalty order dated 22‑12‑2025, which confirmed demands under a show‑cause notice issued on 31‑05‑2024 pursuant to Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner argued that the notice and subsequent order were ex‑parte, that he …

MOINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Moin, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 1877 of 2019) initiated by the State against Dinesh and others under Sections 419, 420, 406 and 411 IPC. The sole ground was that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 …

TILAKRAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The revisionists, Tilakram and two others, filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 11 March 2026, which dismissed their application for discharge in a case involving alleged fraud under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471. They contended that the …

SUNDARAM PANDEY AND 19 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Sundaram Pandey and 19 others, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 30‑09‑2023 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 09‑11‑2023 in State v. Sundaram Pandey (Case No. 1875 of 2023) which involved offences under several IPC …

SANJAY JAISWAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Sanjay Jaiswal and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 1‑3‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 3‑11‑2025, and the entire proceedings of State v. Sanjay Jaiswal (Case No. 1054 of 2025) …

DHARA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Dhara Singh, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No.02 of 2026) alleging his participation in the beating and death of a man. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the injuries were accidental, …

MOHAN LAL AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 7‑8‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 20‑2‑2026, and the entire proceedings of State v. Mohan Lal and others (Case No. 864 of 2026). The court examined the FIR, …

SITAMBAR @ DEENDAYAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the quashing of a summoning order dated 09.03.2026 and the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 1627 of 2024 (Raghav v. Sitampbar @ Deendayal). The High Court examined the complaint and found that the …

BIRBAL RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Birbal Ram filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 7 July 2023, the cognizance and summoning order dated 21 October 2023, and a non‑bailable warrant dated 26 February 2026 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ballia, as well …

ASHISH KESARWANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ashish Kesarwani, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non-bailable warrant (NBW) issued on 9 October 2025 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mirzapur, in a case under Section 379 IPC. The High Court examined the record and found no …

SHIVKUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Shivkumar filed a criminal revision under Section 226 of the CrPC challenging the order of a Judicial Magistrate who had dismissed his complaint alleging abuse and threats by parties 2 and 3. The complaint stemmed from a civil dispute over a conditional sale deed and repayment of money, where the …

ANSHUL SAHUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused Anshul Sahu, who was charged under Sections 316(5), 61(2)(A) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant argued that he was …

TALEEM ANSARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Taleem Ansari, who was charged under IPC sections 376, 363, 366, 506, the POCSO Act (sections 3 and 4) and the Uttar Pradesh Anti‑Conversion Act (section 3/5(1)). The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the alleged victim was a …

PRABHAT AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 13‑09‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 10‑02‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 59 of 2026, which alleged offences under Sections 352, 351(3) and 324(4) of the BNSS. They contended that these …

SMT. MONIKAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Monika, filed a criminal revision petition challenging an order dated 05.09.2022 of the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Varanasi, which had granted her maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code and directed the opposite party to pay Rs. 15,000 per month. …

SHAILESH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Shailesh Kumar Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the proceedings of case no. 29226 of 2023, which involved charges under Sections 420, 406 and 120B IPC. The applicant argued that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) cannot be invoked …

SMT RAJBALA @ RAJMALA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Smt Rajbala and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 27‑08‑2021 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahar, in a criminal case (State v. Dinesh Kumar). They explained that …

DR AJAY GOVILversusMOHAMMAD IRSHAD AND 2 OTHERS

Dr. Ajay Govil, a landlord, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Rent Authority/Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue), Bulandshahr, to decide his tenancy case (Case No. D202311170001279) under Section 21(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Premises Tenancy Act, …

RAJKUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 08‑03‑2026 registered under several sections of the BNS Act and the D.P. Act. The State argued that a charge‑sheet had already been filed under Section 173(2) of the Cr.P.C. and that the appropriate remedy was an …

VARUN SANGWANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Varun Sangwan filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 9 February 2026 in a case arising from alleged offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 351(3) BNS. The applicant contended that the charge …

VINOD PALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vinod Pal under Sections 2(b)(xi), 2(b)(xvii) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in Crime No. 61 of 2026. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, had no conviction in the present case and was …

VAIBHAVversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vaibhav, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 03.02.2026 issued by the Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution Division, Shikohabad, which rejected his request for a compassionate appointment on the ground that he only possessed an Intermediate qualification and …

RAKESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Rakesh Kumar, who is charged under IPC sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The applicant claimed innocence, argued …