Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 11401–11600

HASIM @ RAJA BABUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Hasim @ Raja Babu, who was arrested in a case of alleged sexual assault on a four‑year‑old girl under Sections 9M and 10 of the Protection of Children from …

ANIL GAUR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Anil Gaur and two others who were named in an FIR for a stone‑pelting clash in Hathras. The applicants disclosed modest criminal histories but asserted they had no role in the incident and were …

M/S JINDAL METAL CO. AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

M/s Jindal Metal Co. and another challenged an adjudication order dated 22‑12‑2025 issued under Sections 74 and 122 of the CGST Act, 2017, alleging that the authority failed to consider the petitioners' explanation and imposed a penalty without proper reasoning. The petitioners argued that the order …

PRADUMNversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 18‑11‑2025 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mau, alleging false implication and mala‑fide motives. The magistrate had taken cognizance based on a prima facie view of the …

RAKESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, filed a writ petition in 2018 which remained pending for several years. The High Court had issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard promptly and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared nor …

SUMIT KUMAR PANDEY AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 12‑11‑2019 and the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 40 of 2019, as well as a later order dated 11‑11‑2025 passed in Criminal Revision No. 12 of 2020. The court examined the record and …

VIGUL AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 10‑04‑2021 and the cognizance order dated 01‑07‑2022 in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506 and 325 IPC. They alleged false implication, …

NARENDRA KUMARversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The petitioners claimed they were appointed as Assistant Professors under a 2008 advertisement but could not join because earlier honorarium appointments led to writ petitions, which were resolved by a full bench in Dr. Archana Mishra v. State of U.P. (2018). The respondents suggested remitting the …

JAIS MOHAMMAD @ MAJANU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 01‑08‑2025 and a cognizance order dated 14‑11‑2025 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Bansi, Siddharth Nagar. They contended that the offences alleged – Sections 131, 351(3) and 352 of the BNS – …

MOHD AMAN @ CHANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 5 January 2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 23 July 2025, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 790 of 2025 arising from offences under Sections 147, 283, 341, …

RAFUDDEENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Rafuddeen filed an application under the High Court's inherent jurisdiction seeking to quash the order dated 25‑02‑2026 of the Additional District and Sessions Judge (Special Judge, POCSO) which had rejected his Section 311 Cr.P.C. application for further cross‑examination of prosecution witnesses …

HUSNA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, Husna and another, filed a writ petition challenging an FIR lodged against them. The learned Standing Counsel, A. K. Singh, informed the court that the FIR had indeed been registered. The court examined the petition and found that the matter had become moot because the FIR was …

SMT. KANIKA GUPTAversusBAL KRISHNA GUPTA

The applicant, Smt. Kanika Gupta, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. …

CHANDRESH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

Chandresh Yadav was arrested in a case registered as Crime No.06 of 2026 under Sections 123, 351(3), 64 and 78 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly taking indecent photographs of a female relative, blackmailing her and demanding money. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, …

M/S CHANDA CATERERS AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

M/s Chanda Caterers sought payment of Rs.9,60,000 for supplying food packets and bottled water to beneficiaries of various development schemes during the foundation ceremony of Jewar International Airport on 25-11-2021. The petition alleged that despite a letter from the District Magistrate, …

VIMALA SHAHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Vimala Shahi, a senior citizen of about 81 years, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Civil Security Code seeking the setting aside of an order dated 06.04.2026 in case 1735/2025 (Mahesh Shahi v. Sanjay Singh & Others). She alleged that her son and his family had …

BHAGWAT NISHADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Bhagwat Nishad, father‑in‑law of a deceased woman, was arrested under IPC Sections 85, 80(2), 108 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The deceased was found hanged and the post‑mortem report indicated no injury to the hyoid bone, suggesting a possible suicide. The …

HAJI MOHAMMAD HASNAINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Haji Mohammad Hasnain, who was in custody for offences alleged under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 3(5) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, …

VIVEK SHRIVASversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vivek Shrivas, who was charged under Sections 319(2) and 318(4) of the same Act and Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act for alleged receipt and …

MOHAN JI DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Mohan Ji Dubey filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an award of Rs. 18,85,380 determining compensation for land acquired under the National Highways Act, 1956, and to compel the National Highway Authority of India to fix land rates as per a 2022 order. The respondents …

SANDHYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sandhya, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR that alleged she, along with associates, defrauded an informant of Rs. 1,50,000 by promising doubled returns through cryptocurrency investments and issuing a fake passbook. The petitioner contended that …

CHHEDI LALversusASHA DEVI

The petitioner, Chhedi Lal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Prayagraj, to decide an application filed under Order 39 Rule 1 in Original Suit No. 1700 of 2024 (Chhedi Lal v. Asha Devi) within a specified time. The petitioner argued …

HASNAIN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

Hasnain Khan was arrested on 13 January 2026 and charged under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 500 grams of a narcotic. He filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, claiming innocence and arguing that the mandatory …

KALIKA YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking bail in a case where they were alleged to have committed offences under Sections 323, 380 and 504 of the IPC, as recorded in a police report dated 10-11-2025 and an order dated 25-02-2026. The High Court examined the material …

DIGVIJAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the District Level Committee (DLC) in Gorakhpur to decide his representation promptly and to order the construction of a road as per the revenue map, preventing demolition of his house. The DLC had earlier demarcated the petitioner’s …

MATSAJIVI SAHKARI SAMITI LTD AND 2 OTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHER

The applicants, Matsajivi Sahkari Samiti Ltd and two others, filed a review petition in the Allahabad High Court after their writ petition was disposed on 18 February 2026 and a Special Leave Petition was granted liberty to file a review. They claimed they were prepared to deposit the remaining …

TARIQ MANZOOR KHAN RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The retired District Judge Tariq Manzoor Khan, who had filed the original FIR in a case involving sections 467, 468, 420 and 120B IPC, was summoned as a prosecution witness by the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Prayagraj. Khan, now 75 and residing in Pune, argued that the original FIR was not …

PAPPU @ MAHENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Pappu @ Mahendra, who was arrested in a NDPS case (sections 8/20) for alleged possession of 29.760 kg of ganja. The applicant contended that the seizure and …

SHIVANAND AND ANOTHERversusCHANDRIKA AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D) Rasra, District Ballia, to decide Execution Case No. 7 of 2025 (Shivanand et al. v. Chandriaka et al.) in accordance with a judgment dated 4‑12‑2008 and a decree order dated O.S. No. 1163 of 2002. …

SMT. SULEKHA @ SUREKHAversusRAKESH KUMAR CHATURVEDI

The petitioner, Smt. Sulekha @ Surekha, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 846 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the application, while counsel for the opposite party, Mr. Chandra Prakash Kushwaha, was present. The court noted the …

BOBYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant was arrested in connection with the murder of a deceased whose body was recovered on 14 March 2025. The prosecution presented eyewitness statements that the deceased was last seen with the applicant and co‑accused on 10 March 2025, and a weapon (banka) was recovered after the applicant …

INDRADEV @ CHHOTU VISHWAKARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The revisionist, Indradev Vishwakarma, was charged with an attempt to commit rape under the POCSO Act, alleging the victim was about 14 years old. He contended that the victim was actually a major, that the FIR was lodged after a delay of one and a half months, and that the victim’s statements …

KAKAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the accused Kaka, who was lodged in jail since 7 April 2026 in a complaint case involving offences under Sections 309(6), 352, 351, 74 and 333 of the …

ANKIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ankit Kumar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …

VIVEK SONKARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused Vivek Sonkar, who was charged under Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false …

NITISH KUMAR @ SITARAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitish Kumar (alias Sitaram) in a criminal case (Crime No. 349 of 2025) involving alleged offences under several IPC sections and the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the 18‑year‑old victim was a consenting party who had …

SHANI KUMAR VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shani Kumar Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a charge‑sheet dated 25‑08‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 06‑02‑2026 in a criminal case (Case No. 31 of 2026) arising from FIR under Sections 106(1) and 281 of the …

A.U. SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD.versusSTATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS

A.U. Small Finance Bank Ltd. filed a review petition challenging the High Court's order dated 3 April 2026, which had directed the prescribed authority merely to dispose of a Section 14 application under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The bank argued that the Section 14 application had already been …

ANSAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 181 of 2024) arising from matrimonial disputes involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 354 IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. …

SUSHMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sushma, who is accused in a case involving IPC offences of cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery, and conspiracy, as well as offences under the Prize Cheats and …

RAJA BHAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of Criminal Case No. 9518 of 2022, which involved offences under Sections 147, 325, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and had been pending before the Judicial Magistrate‑I, …

ANUJ SONIversusCHANCHAL SONI

The appellant, Anuj Soni, filed a first appeal against Chanchal Soni in the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant, Shri Prakash Dwivedi, expressed that the appellant does not wish to pursue the appeal. The court considered the request and noted that the appeal was not …

PRADEEP KUMAR TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, a self‑described social worker, filed a public‑interest litigation seeking enforcement of a Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board order dated 12‑09‑2023 directing the closure of a brick‑kiln in Village Narhani Turkwalia, Ballia. The petition alleged that the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate …

BAIJNATHversusSMT. UMA DEVI AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Baijnath filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kanpur Nagar, to decide a pending suit (Case No. 128 of 2024) for permanent and declaratory injunction filed by Smt. Uma Devi. The petitioner argued that the suit needed to be …

SMT NAYAN YADAV @ NAYANTARAversusJAI NARAYAN YADAV AND 4 OTHERS

Smt Nayan Yadav filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge Junior Division, West Ballia, to decide Original Suit No. 423 of 2024 and an accompanying application for a temporary injunction, both pending since 29 March 2024. The petitioner contended that the delay …

SATENDRA @ PAPPUversusSTATE OF U.P.

Satendra @ Pappu was arrested for alleged possession of 21.10 kg of ganja, a country‑made pistol and cartridges, and charged under Sections 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.), Sections 3, 25 and 28 of the Arms Act and Sections 8, 20 of the NDPS Act. He filed a bail application …

SHARIK AALAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

Sharik Aalam was arrested in a case under IPC sections 69, 351(2) and 351(3) BNS for allegedly establishing a relationship with a 24‑year‑old woman on a false promise of marriage and then abandoning her. The prosecution alleged that the victim was misled and that the applicant had gone abroad. The …

SMT. BABITA AGARWALversusSTATE OF U.P. & 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Babita Agarwal, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the petitioners argued that the petition should be dismissed as not pressed, granting them liberty to file a fresh petition. The State of U.P. and other respondents did not oppose this …

PRITIversusRAHUL

The petitioner Priti filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Allahabad, to decide her pending matrimonial case (Case No. 362 of 2025) under sections 13, 25 and 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petition argued that the suit needed to be …

RANJEET CHAURASIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Ranjeet Chaurasiya, who was alleged to be involved in liquor smuggling and charged under Sections 317(2), 341(2) of the BNSS and the Arms Act. The applicant claimed false implication, no prior criminal …

SUJEET VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The appellant challenged the acquittal of the husband and in‑laws of Sanju Verma in a dowry‑death case. The prosecution alleged that the accused harassed the deceased for dowry and caused her death by poisoning, invoking Sections 302/34, 304B, 498A IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …

DEVENDRA SINGH AND 13 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State respondents to decide a representation dated 20 June 2022. An amendment was filed to specifically include a prayer for the Sub-Divisional Magistrate/Deputy Collector of Kanpur to decide the representation within a …

VINOD KUMAR SINGHversusState of U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vinod Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition challenging orders dated 12‑03‑2024 and 21‑03‑2024 passed by the State of U.P. and others. He relied on a prior decision of a co‑ordinate bench in Tej Pal Singh v. State of U.P. (Writ‑A No. 7464 of 2019) which had been set aside and remanded …

KAUSHARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kaushar, who was arrested in a NDPS case (Crime No. 426 of 2025) based solely on confessional statements of co-accused who had already been granted bail. The applicant argued that no narcotics were recovered from his possession and that he is not …

GOPALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Gopal, who is charged under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for alleged possession of 29.760 kg of ganja. The applicant …

SMT. ANKITA AGARWALversusPRIYANK SINGHAL

The applicant, Smt. Ankita Agarwal, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 350 of 2025 against Priyank Singhal. No counsel or party appeared to prosecute the application before the High Court. The Court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim …

RAJESH SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Rajesh Sharma and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 4‑8‑2025 and the charge‑sheet dated 18‑5‑2025 in State v. Rajesh Sharma (case 24124/2025). They contended that the charge‑sheet …

KAMAL KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kamal Kumar Sharma, was demoted by an order dated 27.03.2026 issued by the District Inspector of Schools, Aligarh, without being heard or served notice. The petitioner challenged the ex parte nature of the order, arguing a violation of natural justice. The High Court observed that …

CHHOTELAL GAUTAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Chhotelal Gautam, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and the order rejecting his discharge application in a case pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420 and 406 IPC. The applicant …

ASHISH ALIAS VIJAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ashish alias Vijay, accused of raping the minor daughter of his alleged sister-in-law under Sections 64(2)(F) of the BNS Act and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused took advantage of the informant’s hospitalization to …

NITIN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Nitin Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered as Crime No.30 of 2026, alleged to involve offences under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing to a five‑day delay …

DEVRAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Devraj Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and four others. The State's standing counsel raised a preliminary objection, contending that the petitioner's grievance was against private individuals and therefore not …

RAIS AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rais Ahmad, who was arrested in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act for allegedly possessing 65 kg of cow meat. The applicant …

RADHEY SHYAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Radhey Shyam Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in a narcotics case (NDPS Act, §§8,21) where he was already on bail. He contended that the NBW was issued without first …

VIKAS YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikas Yadav, who was charged under Sections 109(1), 118(1) and 123(1) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting a person named Rinku with sharp edged weapons. The applicant argued that the injuries were simple, he had no prior criminal …

ANSAR AHMAD @ ANSARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ansar Ahmad, challenged an order dated 22 September 2025 passed under Section 72 of the Uttar Pradesh (United Provinces) Excise Act, 1910. They sought relief by filing a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The respondents argued that the petitioners had an …

LALCHAND AND 3 OTHERSversusSUSHIL SRIVASTAVA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge Junior Division, Jaunpur, to decide the pending suit (Case No. 1195 of 2020) against the respondents. The petition alleged that the suit was pending without any progress and requested the High Court to …

SMT SURSATTI DEVIversusSTATE OF UP AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt Sursatti Devi filed a writ petition in which, due to inadvertence, certain deceased persons were incorrectly impleaded as parties. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition and to file a fresh one with the correct parties. Respondent State of UP and others, through …

SANTOSH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Santosh Kumar and two others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was challenged on the ground that it lacked sufficient particulars. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The Court, …

SMT. DIKSHA CHAUHANversusVIKAL KUMAR

Smt. Diksha Chauhan filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 894 of 2022 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The …

ANAND KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Anand Kumar was declared a "goonda" and externed for six months by the District Magistrate, Auraiya, under Section 6 of the Uttar Pradesh Control of Goondas Act, based on two criminal cases. He appealed the order to the Commissioner, Kanpur Division, and sought a stay of the order, which was …

VIRI SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners (Viri Singh and others) filed a criminal revision challenging the Special Judge’s order dated 09‑02‑2026 that dismissed their application for discharge and framed charges under IPC sections 147, 323, 354, 504 and POCSO Act sections 7 and 8. They contended that the victim’s statements …

MITHILESH KUMARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Mithilesh Kumari filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash a cognizance order dated 14‑08‑2025 in State of U.P. v. Mithilesh Kumari (Case No. 11889 of 2025). The applicant argued that the charge sheet improperly invoked both Sections 318(4) and 316(2) BNS (equivalent to IPC …

JAINUL ABADINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Jainul Abadin filed Writ Petition No. 17363 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a wish to withdraw the writ petition and instead pursue relief in the pending suit proceedings. The State’s standing counsel consented to this …

VEER PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Veer Pal Singh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition, seeking liberty to file a fresh petition. The respondents' counsel did not oppose this …

MOHAMMAD IRFANversusMOHAMMAD ARSHAD ALAM AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Mohammad Irfan filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the Civil Judge (J.D.)/F.T.C. (C.A.W.) in Kanpur decide the 6C application in Original Suit No. 246 of 2026 against respondent Mohammad Arshad Alam and others expeditiously, preferably within a stipulated …

INTZAR @ MOTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Intzar @ Mota, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted …

AALHA CHAURASIYA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioners, claiming ownership of Plot No. 401 Minjumla, filed a writ under Article 226 challenging a SARFAESI Act Section 14 order and a subsequent letter issued by the respondent bank. The bank contended that the property belonged to the borrower based on a will and revenue records showing …

VINOD JATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Vinod Jat, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 643 of 2024) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 65(1), 87 of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. He claimed absolute innocence, arguing that the alleged victim, who had recorded a statement under Section …

BHAGWAN SINGHversusVIJENDRA SINGH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Bhagwan Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Mathura to decide Original Suit No. 856 of 2023 against Vijendra Singh and others within a stipulated period. The petitioner’s counsel, Mahabir Yadav, requested an expeditious disposal of …

YASH GOYALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Yash Goyal, who was arrested in connection with a case involving multiple accused under various sections of the Criminal Law Amendment Act and the BNS. The applicant …

SANJAY KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Yadav, had earlier obtained a quashing of orders that cancelled his appointment and withheld his salary in Writ A No.13959 of 2019, with the court directing the respondents to pass appropriate orders. In compliance, the respondents issued an order on 17 February 2026 …

DURGESH @ DURGESH KUMARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Durgesh Kumari, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 13010 of 2025) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh under Sections 420, 406 and 506 of the IPC. The sole ground raised was that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 …

AMITversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Amit, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. Amit claimed he was falsely implicated and …

CHANDRA CHURN PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Chandra Churn Pandey, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a non‑bailable warrant issued in Criminal Case No. 1650 of 2003, relating to offences under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court examined the …

JUNAIDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Junaid was arrested in connection with a violent incident in which Babu died and Javed was injured. While the FIR named 14 persons, the initial statements of the victims did not implicate Junaid, and later statements were contradictory but did not specifically allege that he caused the …

POORAN CHAND VIRATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Pooran Chand Virat filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 3 October 2025 and the charge sheet in State vs. Pooran Chand Virat (Case No. 91924 of 2025) which alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 323, 504 …

SABIR HUSAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sabir Husain, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a complaint case involving alleged offences under Sections 323, 506 and 406 of the IPC. After hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and …

ALIYAR RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Aliyar Ram, a former Assistant Development Officer, who was alleged to have been involved in the illegal sale of food‑grains under the fair‑price shop system. The offences alleged against him included sections 409, 420, …

VAIBHAV DHAMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, an Air Force officer, filed a transfer application seeking to move four criminal cases pending in Bareilly to another district, citing his posting and inability to attend court. He argued that video conferencing would enable his participation. The court referred to its earlier …

SHESH NARAYAN TIWARI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Shesh Narayan Tiwari and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 04‑02‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 30‑07‑2024, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 223 of 2024) relating to …

SHAHMOON ALIAS MOHAMMAD SHAHMOONversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 6073 of 2012) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly, on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the dispute through a compromise dated 21‑02‑2026. The …

VIPUL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Vipul and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 1‑12‑2024 and a cognizance order dated 22‑4‑2025 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad, in a case arising from offences under Sections 352 and 351(3) of …

DEEPAKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 05‑07‑2023 and the cognizance order dated 07‑08‑2023 in Criminal Case No. 19149/2023, which alleged offences under Sections 380, 447, 448, 504 and 506 IPC. The sole ground raised was that the …

SHILA DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Shila Devi and two minor children, sought an expeditious disposal of a pending maintenance enforcement case (Misc. Case No. 63 of 2025) before the Family Court, Chandauli, under Section 147 of the B.N.S.S. Act. The maintenance order, originally passed under Section 125 of the …

SMT. RINKUversusSMT. KRISHNA

The petitioner, Smt. Rinku, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite Civil Suit No.432 of 2014 pending before the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Gautam Budh Nagar. The sole relief claimed was for the trial court to decide the suit within a …

VIPIN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Vipin Singh under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, along with provisions of the BNS Act and the U.P. Social Examination Ordinance, 2024. The applicant alleged that he was falsely implicated for allegedly giving …

SHAVEJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shavej, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

DINESH KUMAR SARSWATversusSURENDRA KUMAR

The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar Sarswat, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge, Court No.3, Hathras, to dispose of Revision No. 73 of 2024 (Dinesh Saraswat vs. Surendra Kumar) within a reasonable time. The revision was filed on …

HEMLATAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hemlata, who was arrested under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant argued that the FIR was filed five days after the alleged incident, showing a fatal delay, and that the investigation had been …

PRADEEP KUMAR PANDEYversusSMT. SANDHYA DEVI

Petitioner Pradep Kumar Pandey filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the High Court to set aside an order dated 8 October 2025 of the Upper Principal Judge, Family Court, Deoria, which had dismissed his application under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in a divorce suit. The …

BHURAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Bhura challenged a 2012 order passed under Section 157-A of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari and Land Reforms Act, 1950 that favored his father, who subsequently executed a sale deed of the land. The writ petition was filed in 2026, fourteen years after the order. The High Court held that …

SHIVAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shivam Yadav, accused in a dowry‑related death case (Crime No. 0125 of 2025) under Sections 80(2), 85 B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant contended that his wife died by suicide, supported by an autopsy …

RAMBABUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rambabu, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 113 of 2025) involving IPC offences (420, 468, 471, 120‑B) and IT Act offences (66C, 66D). The applicant …

DHANARA @ DHANARI DEVIversusSAMARNATH

The petitioner, Dhanara @ Dhanari Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), City, Jaunpur to decide the pending Original Suit No. 104 of 2021 against Samarnath expeditiously. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the suit be decided …

SHAHRUKHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Shahrukh filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing a private bank (respondent no.3) to open the seal on his house. The bank contended that the High Court cannot interfere with actions taken under the SARFAESI Act, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in S. Shobha …

KETAN PATELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Ketan Patel, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, challenging a bail order dated 03‑04‑2026 passed by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Jhansi. The appeal arose from a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 442 …

VINAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Vinay Kumar filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the cognizance and summons order dated 6‑12‑2024 and the charge‑sheet dated 1‑10‑2024 in State vs. Akhilesh Yadav (Case No. 23786 of 2024). The applicant contended that the charge‑sheet improperly alleged offences under Sections …

SAYEED ANJUMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sayeed Anjum, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order, and all proceedings in Criminal Case No. 4137 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352 of the B.N.S., provisions of the D.P. Act and the Muslim …

MONISHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Monish, who was arrested in an NDNDPS case (Sections 8, 21 and 29) for allegedly possessing 50 g of ‘smack’, a quantity below the commercial threshold. The applicant …

ABIDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of the accused Abid, who was charged under Sections 3(5) of the same Act and Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …

PRINCE DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Prince Dubey in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15034 of 2026, relating to Crime No. 108 of 2025 under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was missing, …

HANI VERMA @ YOGENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hani Verma (applicant) in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was filed two days after the alleged incident, that there was …

ABHINAV ANANT AND ANOTHERversusTATA CAPITAL LIMITED AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Abhinav Anant and another filed a writ petition seeking to withdraw the proceedings under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Their counsel, Girish Pandey, requested the court to allow the withdrawal and to grant liberty to pursue appropriate legal steps thereafter. …

USHA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Usha Devi, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition while requesting liberty to pursue any other appropriate legal remedy. The court considered the petitioner's request for withdrawal. It held that the …

RANI KINNARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rani Kinnar, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

SHADABversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Shadab in a case involving alleged violations of Sections 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3, 5, and 8 of the Cow Slaughter (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …

MOHAMMAD HANIFversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mohammad Hanif, who is charged under Sections 2(b)(i), 2(b)(xvii) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

KRISHNAWATI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Krishnawati Devi, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the respondent No.2 to decide pending proceedings under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which have been pending since 2020 despite a Lekhpal report filed in 2022. The petitioner argued that the delay was …

DHARMENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Dharmendra, who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he was already …

MOTILALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Motilal, who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he was …

YUSUF AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Yusuf and five others, were charged under Sections 447 (criminal trespass) and 489 (robbery) of the IPC for an alleged offence in Saharanpur. They filed an application under Section 528 seeking quash of the charge‑sheet and the cognizance order, contending that Section 447 cannot be …

M/S MAA VAISHNO FILLING STATIONversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

M/S Maa Vaishno Filling Station filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing private respondents to pay Rs.13,20,000 for alleged breach of contract relating to branding and compensation. The petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Court examined whether the private …

STATE OF UPversusMANOJ SINGH AND OTHERS

The State of Uttar Pradesh filed Government Appeal Defective No. 122 of 2026 against Manoj Singh and others before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The appeal was listed before Court No. 43 and heard by Hon’ble Justices Salil Kumar Rai and Devendra Singh‑I. After a delay of 151 days, the …

HARSH MITTALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Harsh Mittan, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Court, Aligarh, to expedite the pending complaint (Case No. 184/2024) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against Rajendra Singh. The petitioner argued that the trial was …

AMAN ALIAS AMAANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aman (alias Amaan) in a case under several IPC sections relating to alleged indecent assault and related offences. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing out a four‑day delay in filing the FIR, the absence of any indecent …

DEEPU BHARTIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepu Bharti in an NDPS case (Crime No. 131 of 2026) alleging that he was falsely implicated in a drug‑trafficking offence. No contraband was recovered from his possession and he was not arrested on the spot, unlike co‑accused who were police …

LAVKUSHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 35 OTHERS

Petitioner Lavkush filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Mirzapur, to decide a pending case (No. 28093/2025) under Section 134 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which had been delayed since 2025. The petitioner argued that multiple dates had …

CHANDRA PRAKASH AGARWALversusAJEET KUMAR SINGH AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 20‑03‑2026 in Writ Petition No. 10684 of 2026. The order was served on the opposite party on 24‑03‑2026, but the court found …

DEEPAK HARIJANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Deepak Harijan, who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended that he was …

KRISH KEERWAL @ CHIRAGversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Krish Keerwal @ Chirag, who had been in custody since 31 March 2026 in connection with a case under Sections 109(1), 125, 191(2) and 190 of the B.N.S., 2023. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and had no …

BRAHAM PRAKASHversusSEEMA RANI SAXENA

Petitioner Braham Prakash filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Auraiya, to decide the pending Hindu Marriage Act case (HMA No. 570 of 2024) against respondent Seema Rani Saxena. The petitioner argued that the family court had unduly …

SHADABversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shadab, accused in Crime No. 90 of 2025 under Sections 109(1), 352 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 4 and 5 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the key witnesses had turned hostile …

ABHAY KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Abhay Kumar Singh, challenged the order of punishment affirmed in an appeal before the High Court of Allahabad. The respondents, the State of U.P. and others, contended that the petitioner had a statutory alternative remedy under Rule 23 of the U.P. Police Officials of the …

SURENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Surendra Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State authorities not to harass him for recovery of a stamp duty deficiency of Rs. 69,35,000 that was determined against the vendee, Kailash Chandra Saxena, under Section 47A(3) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. The …

SHYAM NARAIN CHAUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shyam Narain Chaubey, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 03-10-2025 issued under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The respondent State of U.P. and others raised a preliminary objection that the impugned order is appealable under Section 67(5) of the …

SANJAY YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants, Sanjay Yadav and Yadraam Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act concerning alleged adulteration of biodiesel. They claimed false implication by the …

DAYARAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Dayaram Yadav filed a writ petition challenging the Lekhpal's demarcation reports (RC Form‑19 dated 08‑01‑2025 and RC Form‑20 dated 03‑07‑2025) and a dispossession order dated 17‑07‑2025, seeking certiorari and mandamus to prevent interference with his possession. The petitioner also raised that a …

LALLAN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Lallan Kumar, who was arrested in a complaint case involving IPC sections 323, 498-A, 377, 506 and sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely …

SMT ARTI ANANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt Arti Anand, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the trial court to dispose of a pending complaint under Section 125 Cr.P.C. (case No. 139 of 2024) concerning maintenance. The trial court had not concluded the matter for more …

ATA HUSAIN AND 7 OTHERSversusGULAM NAKI AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a suit seeking a declaration of ownership and a permanent injunction over certain plots, also moving for a temporary injunction. The trial court granted a status‑quo order without examining the counter‑claim filed by the respondents or making a finding on possession. The …

SMT SUMAN SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF UP AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt. Suman Srivastava filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to investigate false complaints lodged by respondents 5 and 6, and to restrain coercive action against her family. She also requested that any interim orders be vacated. During …

DARSHAN SINGH SAHNIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Darshan Singh Sahni, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 09.04.2026 passed by respondent No.2 in Case No.14608 of 2025, which was issued under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 concerning land in Village Morta, Ghaziabad. The …

DHARMENDRAversusRAMOTAR AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Dharmendra filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The petitioner, through counsel Jata Shankar Pandey, later requested to withdraw the petition on the ground of an inherent defect, asking for liberty to file a fresh petition. The learned Standing Counsel …

EKABAL AHAMADversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

Ekabal Ahamad applied for a passport but the Regional Passport Office in Lucknow refused to issue it, citing the pendency of a criminal case against him. He filed a writ petition seeking a fresh passport, alleging irreparable loss if denied. The Court referred to its earlier decision in Pawan Kumar …

SMT ZEERA DEVIversusPHOOLCHAND @ CHORE AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court examined a contempt application filed by Smt Zeera Devi against Phoolchand @ Chore and others, alleging that they violated an interim order dated 20 January 2025 which directed the parties to maintain the status quo concerning agricultural land. The interim order, issued in a writ …

SANTOSH KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction for the removal of illegal encroachments on plots 245 and 246 in Village Hinauta, Kaushambi. The encroachers had previously been ordered to vacate under Section 122B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, …

MANOJ KUMAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Manoj Kumar Shukla filed a PIL seeking mandamus directing the respondents to enforce earlier orders restraining construction and to decide applications alleging illegal construction on reserve land. The respondents argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar …

KRISHAN KANHAIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

The petitioner, Krishan Kanhaiya, filed a writ petition under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, seeking a mandamus directing the respondent (Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Hata) to decide a pending mutation case (No. 6825 of 2025) that had been delayed since 2025 despite several dates …

SANJEEV TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sanjeev Tripathi, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court and subsequently sought to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue any other appropriate legal remedy. The petition was considered by a bench of Hon'ble Justices Saral Srivastava and Garima Prashad. …

RAM CHANDRA AND 16 OTHERSversusARBITRATOR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND 2 OTHERS

Ram Chandra and 16 others filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the District Magistrate/Arbitrator in Ghazipur to decide the pending case No. 3365 of 2025 (National Highway Authority of India vs Competent Authority/Additional District Magistrate) under Section 3G(5) of the …

ANKUR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered the bail application of Ankur Shukla, accused in Crime No.151 of 2025 for the death of his wife. The applicant contended that the death was a suicide, citing a post‑mortem report showing hanging, an intact hyoid bone, and the hostile, non‑supportive testimony of …

MAUSEEM ALIAS MOHSINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mauseem alias Mohsin, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC after a summons dated 26.05.2022 in a case alleging offences under Sections 302 and 506 IPC. He claimed innocence, asserted that the allegations were false and that he had been exonerated during …

SHEKHARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Shekhar, who is accused under Section 109(1) of the same Act and Sections 3, 25 and 28 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that no police officer was injured …

AFSAR AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 31‑03‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 23‑05‑2024 in Case No. 21861, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 323, 506, 452 and 448 IPC. Their sole contention was that the charge‑sheet under …

SITA RAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to decide a restoration application filed on 27 November 2020, which had remained pending despite several dates being fixed. The petitioner argued that the delay was unjustified and requested an expeditious decision. …

SON DEVI @ SOMWATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Son Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to decide her representation dated 11 March 2026 within a fixed period. The Court observed that the dispute is a private matter involving factual issues that require evidence and cannot be …

PRAVEEN KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Praveen Kumar Gupta, who was implicated in a FIR for alleged trade tax evasion and charged under IPC sections 420, 467 and 468. The applicant argued that the FIR was false, that the case had …

JAHIDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jahid, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 127(2), 70(2) of the IPC and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual activity with a girl who was reportedly under 17. The applicant contended that the relationship …

JADAWATI VISHVAKARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jadawati Vishvakarma, who was alleged to have participated in the assault leading to the death of an informant’s wife. The FIR named her among six accused, but the post‑mortem report indicated injuries that were old and the cause of death was …

SUKHVEER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sukhveer Singh, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the State of Uttar Pradesh and others to remove an illegal encroachment on public utility land (Khasra No.100) and to enforce an eviction and damages order dated 16 November 2015 against …

DEEPANSHU MISHRA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 16178 of 2020) on the ground that they had reached a compromise dated 19‑12‑2025. The State opposed, contending that the trial court must first verify the existence and terms of any …

HEERA LAL AND 4 OTHERSversusCHANDRA SHEKHAR AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed O.S. No.328 of 2022 seeking prohibitory and mandatory injunctions, which was decreed on 08.03.2021. The respondents appealed the decree (Civil Appeal No.7 of 2021) and a stay application was decided on 30.04.2025, where no stay was granted but a date was fixed for hearing. …

SHYAM SUNDAR YADAVversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shyam Sundar Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India and the Regional Passport Officer, Varanasi, to issue a police verification certificate and passport despite a pending criminal case (Case Crime No. 131 of 2025). The respondent had refused to …

SUMAN MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant Suman Mishra filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the trial court to decide a criminal case (State Vs. Dilip Kumar Mishra) pending since 2011, involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 406, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC and Sections …

NOOR MOHAMMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Noor Mohammad, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking bail. The counsel for the applicant sought to withdraw the application, relying on the precedent set in Dinesh Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another (2017 AIR All 29). The High Court …

RASHIDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rashid, who was arrested in a case under Sections 8 and 22 of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 130 g of Alprazolam powder. The applicant argued that the seizure …

MOHIT SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered the bail application of Mohit Sharma, who was arrested in connection with a fight alleged under several IPC sections and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, had only a general role in the FIR, no weapon was …

KUNDAN SINGH PATEL @ VISHALversusSTATE OF U.P.

Kundan Singh Patel @ Vishal applied for bail in a case arising from S.T. No.818 of 2024, where he is charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. This is his second bail application; the first was rejected on 13‑Jan‑2026. The applicant offered no new ground for bail …

ANIL KISHORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition in 2018 before the Allahabad High Court, which remained pending for several years. The court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and warned that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel …

AYUSH SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ayush Sharma, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 230 of 2026 involving multiple offences under the BNS and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant …

SANJAY UPRETIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Sanjay Upreti filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Collector/District Magistrate of Gautam Budh Nagar to execute a Recovery Certificate issued by RERA on 27 July 2024 for a sum of Rs.19,70,506.02 with interest. The respondents, including RERA and the …

RAMASHRAY YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Ramashray Yadav, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner requested that the petition be dismissed and that the petitioner be given liberty to file a fresh writ petition challenging the decision dated 15‑10‑2025. The Court …

KAILASH BABUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 20 OTHERS

Petitioner Kailash Babu filed a writ petition seeking a direction to respondent No.2 to decide a stay application filed on 29 September 2025 in Revision No.4815 of 2025. The revision, accompanied by the stay, has remained pending for over six months without any hearing, and the respondent has not …

MUMTAJ AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mumtaj Ahmad, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to remove an encroachment on a 0.081 hectare Banjar land parcel in Kushinagar district. The court noted a preliminary objection that the petitioner …

HARKESH SINGH AND 14 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Fifteen petitioners, all Head Masters in Junior High Schools, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the District Basic Education Officer to pay them the promotional increment and arrears with interest. The respondents, including the State of Uttar Pradesh and the education officer, …

MADAN GOPAL (SINCE DECEASED) AND ANOTHERversusNARAD AND 13 OTHERS

The petitioners, heirs of the deceased Madan Gopal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) of Bansi Siddharth Nagar to decide the pending Original Suit No. 96 of 1990 against the respondents expeditiously. The sole relief claimed was for the High Court …

SUDHIR KUMAR RAJAURAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar Rajaura, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 20-11-2025 passed by a revenue officer under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged that the order was erroneous and sought its setting aside. The …

KANCHAN BHARTIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Kanchan Bharti filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of a pending criminal complaint (Case No. 2432 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 419, 420, 323, 504, 506 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The matter was before …

SANGEETA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sangeeta Devi, filed a writ petition under certiorari challenging an order dated 20‑11‑2025 passed by a revenue officer under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner sought quashing of the order. The respondent’s standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that …

KIRAN PANDEYversusBHAGGU (SINCE DECEASED) AND 7 OTHERS

In this writ petition under Article 227, Kiran Pandey challenged the rejection of an amendment application filed in a related appeal. The petitioner’s counsel, Arvind Kumar Shukla, argued that despite the rejection, the present petition was filed and that the petitioner should be allowed to raise …

IMRANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Imran challenged an order dated 06.03.2026 by the Additional District Magistrate, Bulandshahr, which externed him for six months under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Control of Goonda Act, 1970. He filed an appeal (No.21 of 2026) under Section 6(1) of the same Act and a stay application, both pending …

RAJNARAYAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 13 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rajnarayan Singh, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to compel Respondent No.3 to remove encroachments by Respondents No.5‑14 on land Gata 319 in Madari village, and to enforce compliance with orders of the Assistant Collector dated 10‑Nov‑2022, 25‑Sep‑2025 and 26‑Dec‑2025 under …

SAHILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sahil, who was arrested in a NDPS case involving 3.2 kg of opium and 156 g of smack. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record, …

AJAYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay, accused in Criminal Case No. 751 of 2024 under Sections 103(1), 238(A) and 61(2)(A) of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that the prosecution’s witnesses only implicated co‑accused Rekha, Anjali and Shivani, and that he was falsely implicated …

PRAVEEN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Praveen Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 20‑04‑2026 registered under Sections 26, 52 of the Indian Forest Act and Sections 109, 132 BNS. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a …

IRSHAD ALI ALIAS SHERUversusMUID IMTIYAZ AND 2 OTHERS

Irshad Ali alias Sheru filed a criminal transfer application (No. 281 of 2026) against Muid Imtiyaz and two others. The applicant's counsel, Balbir Yadav, informed the court that the applicant no longer wishes to pursue the transfer and sought dismissal of the petition, citing inherent defects and …

M/S FAMOUS ELECTRONIC AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners M/s Famous Electronic and others filed Writ Petition No. 16625 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief related to an auction. Respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petition was a second filing on the same cause, the earlier petition (Writ C No. 28347 of 2024) …

ANUJ GUPTA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners Anuj Gupta and another filed writ petition No. 17539 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four others. The petitioners' counsel argued that the petition should be dismissed as it was not pressed, since the petitioners could avail …

SACHIN THAKUR @ DAMARUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sachin Thakur, who was arrested under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, in Crime No. 27 of 2026. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated based on a solitary base case (Crime No. 618 …

MAHESHWAR PRATAP SHAHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 08.02.2023 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) under Section 145(1) CrPC, which directed both parties to maintain status quo over a disputed property. The applicant argued …

SURAJ JUMANI @ SURAJ AMARLAL @ AMARLAL SURAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Suraj Jumani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking quash of FIR dated 20-12-2025 (Crime No. 303 of 2025) alleging cheating in a share‑broker scheme. The FIR alleges that the petitioner induced an informant to invest Rs. 22 lakh by claiming affiliation …

ARUN KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Arun Kumar Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an FIR dated 09‑04‑2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel withdrew the main relief sought but requested that the …