Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 11801–12000

PRADEEP SHARMAversusSMT. NEHA

Petitioner Pradeep Sharma filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Gautam Buddha Nagar, to decide his pending divorce petition (No. 825 of 2024) under section 13(1)(i‑a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner argued for an …

ANAND KUMAR SHARMAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

Anand Kumar Sharma applied for a passport but the Regional Passport Office in Lucknow refused to process it, citing a pending criminal case against him. He filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to issue the passport. The Court noted earlier judgments that mere pendency …

RITIK KUMAR RAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ritik Kumar Rai, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash an order dated 23 March 2026 passed by the District Magistrate of Mau in Criminal Case No. 2303 of 2025. The impugned order related to offences under the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, Animal …

AVADHESH GIRIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Avadhesh Giri, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in an NDNDPS case where 8.65 g of MDMA was seized from his possession. The defence argued that the quantity was below the commercial threshold and that the recovery violated Section 50 of the …

RAKESH DAS AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Rakesh Das and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State respondents to act on a representation dated 18 January 2026 and to pay compensation. The State respondents objected, arguing that the petition was based on vague pleadings, was stale, and suffered …

DIVAKAR YADAVversusGEETA DEVI

Divakar Yadav filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Jaunpur, to expedite the hearing of Misc. Case No. 213 of 2024 (Divakar v. Geeta) and to recall an order dated 25‑09‑2024 in Case No. 854 of 2022. The petition claimed …

SAHABAJ CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Sahabaj Chauhan filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a revenue officer, to decide a pending case (RST/5773/2025) under sections 34 and 209(ज) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the case had been pending since 2025 despite …

ANITAversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Anita filed writ petition No.17497 of 2026 seeking a direction to the second respondent, a revenue authority, to decide a restoration/recall application pending in suit RST/5323/2025. The petitioner contended that the application had remained undecided despite several dates being …

ANKIT @ GULLUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Ankit @ Gullu, who was named in an FIR for robbery, assault and related offences after a six‑day delay. The applicant claimed false implication and asserted no prior criminal record, while …

ASHWANI KUMAR KAMBOJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Ashwani Kumar Kamboj filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash a sale notice dated 20.03.2026 issued by a private finance company. The respondents contended that the High Court lacks jurisdiction to interfere with actions taken under the SARFAESI Act, relying …

DEEPUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Deepu filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summoning order, a non‑bailable warrant dated 20‑01‑2026, and criminal proceedings under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. and a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. During the hearing, …

NAIMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Naim, filed a Section 528 BNSS application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an order dated 17 September 2025 issued by a Village Court that had authorized a recovery warrant and a conditional non‑bailable arrest warrant against him under Section 12 of the Protection of …

SACHIN @ BHANU PRATAPversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sachin @ Bhanu Pratap, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.130 of 2026) alleging that he had entered a consensual relationship with a 24‑year‑old woman under a false promise of marriage and later refused to marry her. The prosecution alleged deception, while the defence argued …

SMT VALIYA GAUR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt Valiya Gaur and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Mahmudul Hasan, later informed the court that they did not wish to pursue the petition. The petition was therefore not pressed before the court. The court considered whether it could dismiss …

RAGHVENDRA SINGHversusMRS MONIKA RANI

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 10 September 2025 in Writ Petition No. 12932 of 2025. The order had been served on the opposite party on 27 September 2025, but …

VEERBAL SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner applied for renewal of passport No.L9568534, but the Regional Passport Officer in Lucknow refused to process the application citing a pending criminal case against him. The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the officer to consider his claim and re‑issue the passport. The …

SUNAINAversusMAYA DEVI

Sunaina filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ghazipur, to decide her pending suit No. 234 of 2023 for recovery of money. The High Court noted that the suit was already pending and that issuing further notices in the writ petition would be …

SIDDHARTH SHANKAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Siddharth Shankar Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and four others. The petition was examined and found to be defective because it did not specify the relief sought nor clearly identify a cause of action. The Court …

VINODversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Vinod sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS in a case arising from a 2015 incident where he was initially not charge‑sheeted but later summoned after a witness altered his statement to implicate Vinod. The prosecution argued that the applicant was the principal …

SMT SARITA SINGHversusMRS. MONIKA RANI

The applicant, Smt Sarita Singh, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Mrs Monika Rani, willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 10 September 2025 in Writ Petition No. 12928 of 2025. The order had been served on the …

VIRENDRA KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSUGGA LAL AND 15 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the District Judge, Kaushambi, to decide Civil Appeal No. 45 of 2025 (Sugga Lal & others v. Badri Prasad & others) expeditiously. The High Court noted that the civil appeal was pending and that keeping the writ petition …

AMAR NATHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Amar Nath filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to decide an application dated 24 September 2020 filed under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 for land demarcation. The petitioner alleged that the application remained pending despite several …

KARAMVEER SINGH @ TINKU SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Karamveer Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a criminal case pending trial. He later sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead move a regular bail application before the trial court, requesting protection of his …

RAMNAYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of Criminal Miscellaneous Appeal No. 41 of 2025, which had remained pending since 2024. The appeal involved offences under Sections 34, 302, 307, 504, 506, 201 and 120B of the IPC …

SHYAMPALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shyampal, filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 19‑03‑2025 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasganj, in a criminal case (Cr. No. 252 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 363 and 376 IPC. The applicant contended …

MANOJ KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

Manoj Kumar, a tenure holder of land acquired for the Delhi‑Dehradun Economic Corridor, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India and other respondents to pay compensation as ordered by the Additional District Judge/Special Judge on 28‑Nov‑2025. Despite that order and …

REKHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Rekha, who was implicated in a case under the Cow Slaughter Act (sections 3, 5A, 5B, 8) and the Animal Cruelty Act (section 11) for allegedly transporting ten cattle. The FIR was lodged on 5 April 2026 …

INDRAWATI URF BINDRAWATI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Indrawati Urf Bindrawati Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 04-04-2026 registered under Sections 85, 80(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. During the hearing she withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the lower …

VINAYAK MALVIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Vinayak Malviya, who was arrested under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, in Crime No.13 of 2026. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that only …

SABA PARVEEN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking an expeditious disposal of a pending domestic violence case (Case No. 223 of 2021) filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The trial court had been handling the matter …

IQBAL HUSSAIN KHAN AND ANOTHERversusRASHEED KHAN AND 2 OTHERS

The appellants challenged an order of the Civil Judge (Senior Division) that allowed the plaintiff to withdraw his suit for permanent injunction under Order XXIII Rule Part 1(3) of the CPC, subject to a condition that the plaintiff could file a fresh suit if desired. The defendant consented to the …

ARJUN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Arjun Singh, who was arrested in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, had been in …

PANKAJ PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pankaj Pandey, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and pointed out that he had no prior …

MAMTA CHANDELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mamta Chandel, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the respondents to allow her to participate in the counseling and be placed on the merit list for the appointment of Assistant Teachers to 12,460 vacancies advertised on 20-12-2016. The respondents contended that the …

DHANESH KUMAR UPADHYAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Nayab Tehsildar of Panasa to decide a pending mutation suit (case no. 15878 of 2024) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the suit had been pending since 2024 despite several dates being …

NARENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Narendra Kumar filed a PIL seeking a court direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh to act against a fourth respondent for removing an illegal encroachment on Plot No. 535, recorded as banjar land in Basti district. The respondent's standing counsel argued that the petitioner has an alternative …

BHUAL GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhual Gupta in a murder case (Crime No. 36 of 2026) where the applicant was not named in the FIR and was allegedly implicated only on the basis of three witness statements that he was seen leaving the scene. The applicant argued that there was no …

GAURAV SAXENAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Gaurav Saxena, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the trial court to decide a pending Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case (Complaint No. 4773 of 2021) within a stipulated period. The trial court in Aligarh had not yet …

VIJENDRA SINGHversusTIKAM SINGH AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Vijendra Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite the pending Civil Suit No.433 of 2014 against Tikam Singh. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the suit be decided expeditiously, arguing that the writ petition had no …

VIVEK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Vivek Kumar, who was implicated in an FIR alleging he allowed another person to sit for his D.L.Ed. examination. The applicant claimed false implication, had no prior criminal record, and had …

LAL BABU SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Lal Babu Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (respondent No. 2) to decide case No. 7072/2024 filed under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 2024. The petitioner argued that the proceeding should be …

PAWAN KUMAR GAUTAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Pawan Kumar Gautam filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court’s direction to expedite two pending applications dated 04.01.2025 and 25.08.2025 in Sessions Trial No. 714 of 2024 (State v. Hamid Ali & Another), which involve offences under IPC sections …

M/S BALAJI INTERIORSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, M/s Balaji Interiors, challenged an adjudication order dated 21‑08‑2024 issued after a show‑cause notice was uploaded electronically on the GST Common Portal, despite its registration having been cancelled on 13‑10‑2021. The Court examined whether service of the notice by electronic …

VINDHYAVASINI PRASAD TIWARIversusPAWAN KUMAR GANGWAR-DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

A contempt application was filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act against the District Magistrate for allegedly willfully disobeying a judgment dated 12‑01‑2026 in Writ Petition No. 19339 of 2025. The applicant claimed the order was served on 19‑01‑2026 but remained unimplemented. The …

MALIK ATAULLAHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Malik Ataullah, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking an order for the speedy disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 116 of 2025, which was pending before the Additional Sessions Judge‑I, Kanpur Nagar. The applicant highlighted that the appeal had been pending for a long …

SARITA PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Sarita Pandey, appointed on a one‑year contractual basis in 2010 as District Social Audit Coordinator, continued in the post for about 15 years and later developed visual impairment. After the contract expired on 01‑04‑2026, the authorities did not grant her an extension, unlike similarly situated …

VIKASH KUMAR PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Vikash Kumar Pal filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing certain respondents to remove illegal encroachments on a 0.0160 hectare plot in Jaunpur. The petition argued that the respondents had constructed on the land without authority. The respondents contended that the …

MALIK ATAULLAHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Malik Ataullah, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking an order for the speedy disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 31 of 2026 pending before the District and Sessions Judge, Kanpur Nagar. The State's Additional Government Advocate did not oppose the request. The High …

JALESHWAR NATH PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Jaleshwar Nath Pandey and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the applicability of a pension scheme administered by the State of Uttar Pradesh. They contended that the scheme was being applied incorrectly to them. The respondents, the State of …

RAMCHANDRA RAI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ramchandra Rai and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summons order dated 07‑01‑2019 and a subsequent order dated 30‑03‑2026 in State v. Ramchandar case, which arose from an FIR under IPC sections …

M/S RAINBOW IMPEX AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, M/s Rainbow Impex and another, sought to file an appeal against an Order-in-Original passed under the Customs Act, 1962, and requested that the respondent customs authority decide a waiver application pending before it. The High Court noted that a prior decision in M/s Runway Impex …

COLONEL ADITYA DEOversusLT COL PRIYAMVADA CHAUBEY

Petitioner Colonel Aditya Deo filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Varanasi, to decide the pending matrimonial suit (Case No. 1629 of 2023) under section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner argued that the suit was …

ANCHAL VISHWAKRMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Anchal Vishwakrma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 17‑04‑2026 registered under several IPC provisions and sections of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The State argued that the FIR was prima facie established based on statements …

SMT. RASHMI MAURYA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt. Rashmi Maurya and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel later informed the court that they did not wish to pursue the petition and sought its dismissal as not pressed. The court considered the request for withdrawal and, finding no objection, …

MUKHRAM NISHADversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the Regional Passport Office to call for the report from the investigating authority and issue a passport despite a pending criminal case. The Court noted that, per its earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar v. Union of India, mere pendency of …

RAMLAL SINGH KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ramlal Singh Kushwaha, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of a pending criminal case (Criminal Case No. 43179 of 2023) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which was pending before the Judicial …

VINOD KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh, YEIDA, NHAI and the District Magistrate of Hathras to decide their representation dated 10‑12‑2025 for payment of compensation and interest for land acquired at Village Bichpuri. They claimed the land …

SMT. BADAMI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Smt. Badami Devi filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents to decide a representation dated 07-10-2025. The respondents contended that the petition was not maintainable because there is no statutory provision …

SUNAHERI LAL (SUB INSPECTOR) AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad heard an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Sub‑Inspector Sunaheri Lal and five others, who were charged under Section 395 IPC for an alleged offence in Sahavar, Kasganj. The applicants, through counsel, sought to withdraw the …

POONAM BHARTIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Poonam Bharti filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 11‑04‑2026 under Section 105 BNS. During the hearing, she withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the lower court consider her bail application in accordance with the Supreme …

RAJESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar, a government employee, filed a writ petition alleging that arrears of salary amounting to approximately Rs. 1.85 lakh, due after re-fixation, have not been paid by the State of U.P. and other respondents. The High Court examined the grievance and directed the petitioner to …

SMT ANITA DEVI WIDOWversusSRI SHANKAR DAYAL AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Anita Devi Widow, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Hamirpur to dispose of Original Suit No. 60 of 2010 (Shankar Dayal & Others v. Anita) which had been pending since February 2010. The sole relief claimed was an …

HARISH CHAHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Harish Chahar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 20‑04‑2026 registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The State argued that the victim’s injuries established a prima facie case, which the petitioner could not rebut. The petitioner …

YOGRAJ SINGH CHAUHANversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner applied for renewal of passport No. P6937931, but the Regional Passport Office in Lucknow refused to process it citing pendency of a criminal case against him. He filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to renew his passport and to consider his …

TANVEERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Tanveer, accused in a case under Sections 352, 351(2) and 64(1) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged assault and rape. The applicant claimed innocence, citing a 15‑day delay in filing the FIR, absence of medical evidence, no recovery of alleged …

MOHAMMAD AYUB KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohammad Ayub Khan, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Sikandarpur, Ballia to decide a stay application pending in appeal No. 20261509020215. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the stay application remained …

NIRPATI SINGHversusALOK SINGH

The applicant, Nirpati Singh, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act seeking punishment of the opposite party, Alok Singh, for willful disobedience of a judgment dated 19 November 2025 in Writ Petition No. 17356 of 2025. The order was served to the opposite party …

SUMITRAversusGIRIJESH SINGH

The petitioner, Sumitra, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Kushinagar to decide a pending suit for cancellation of a sale deed (case no. 19 of 2023). The petition sought an expeditious decision on the suit and the accompanying 6C …

NEERAJ KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Neeraj Kumar Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 29‑07‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 10‑06‑2025 in State v. Vijay Kumar Maurya (Case No. 2125 of 2025). The chargesheet alleged offences under Sections 419, …

VIPIN KUMAR RATHOREversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Vipin Kumar Rathore filed a writ petition seeking to quash an order dated 23 July 2025 issued by the Deputy Director of Agriculture, Pilibhit, and also raised the termination of his services dated 29 August 2025 by Avani Paridhi Energy & Communication Pvt. Ltd. The petitioner was employed as an …

RAM CHANDAR MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ram Chandar Maurya, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 18‑03‑2026 issued in Criminal Case No.6568 of 2007 (State vs. Radhey Shyam) involving offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The …

SHIV KUMARversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 8 OTHERS

Shiv Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Assistant Sub‑Divisional Officer, II, Jaunpur to decide an application dated 17‑12‑2016 under Section 229(b) of the U.P. Zila Adalat & Land Revenue Act, 1950, which had remained pending since 2016. He had previously filed a similar …

M/S SERVOKON SYSTEMS LIMITEDversusUINION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHER

The High Court of Allahabad heard a civil miscellaneous review application filed by M/S Servokon Systems Ltd. seeking clarification and modification of an order dated 25 March 2026 that directed the company to deposit 10 % of an alleged liability but did not specify the deposit forum. The applicant …

M/S MAPLE LEAF INTELLIGENT SOLUTION PVTLTDversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHER

The High Court of Allahabad entertained a review (actually a correction/modification) application filed by M/s Maple Leaf Intelligent Solution Pvt Ltd against an order dated 25‑03‑2026. The applicant sought clarification on the computation and deposit of a 10% amount and pointed out errors in the …

SACHIN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusHARENDRA AND 2 OTHER

The petitioners, Sachin Kumar Sharma and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the trial court to decide Civil Suit No. 2112 of 2024 (Harendra and others v. Sharma) expeditiously, alleging that delay would cause irreparable loss. The petition alleged that the …

SMT. ANEETAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER

Smt. Aneeta filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to grant her family pension with arrears and interest dating from June 26, 2008. The petitioner alleged that despite repeated representations, the pension had not been paid. The …

SMT. ASHUversusTANU CHAUDHARY

The applicant, Smt. Ashu, filed a transfer application (Civil No. 950 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit against Tanu Chaudhary. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The Court observed that the application was not prosecuted and …

SHIV PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHER

The petitioner, Shiv Prasad, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 21-11-2025 that transferred him to his home block. The respondents, the State of U.P. and two others, informed the court that after the transfer, the petitioner was suspended and a departmental inquiry was underway. During …

ARVIND KUMARversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court examined a writ petition challenging an order dated 16‑April‑2024 that dismissed the petitioner's claim because his name was absent from a 2016 inspection list related to a grant‑in‑aid. The petitioner relied on a Zila Vidyalaya Nirikshan report dated 8‑April‑2024, arguing …

Subash @ Suvash AND ANOTHERversusSmt Seema Pathak and 10 others

The applicants, Subash @ Suvash and another, filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad seeking to transfer the suit against Smt. Seema Pathak and ten others. The application was to be pressed by counsel Akhilendra Singh, Prabhat Kumar Singh and Shyam Singh. No counsel …

RAM MILAN MISHRAversusSRI GORANG RATHI, D.M. AND 3 OTHERS

The writ court had directed the opposite party to complete proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The opposite party filed a compliance affidavit on 5 February 2024, stating that the required proceedings were concluded on 29 January 2024 and attached the relevant document. The …

SUNITA DEVIversusState of UP AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Sunita Devi challenged a notice dated 18 March 2024 issued by the Police Commissioner, Varanasi. The petitioner argued that a subsequent decision in another writ (Writ A No.11573 of 2024) rendered the present petition moot. The court examined whether the notice could still be contested in …

Smt Priyanka JainversusIshan Jain And 4 Others

Smt Priyanka Jain filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 408 of 2024 against Ishan Jain and four others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the transfer request, while counsel for the opposite parties was present. The High Court noted the lack of prosecution of the …

DILIP KUMAR PATELversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Dilip Kumar Patel, accused of murder, kidnapping and conspiracy under IPC sections 302, 364, 201 and 120B. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, Anil Patel, had been released on bail in a similar case, that he had no prior criminal …

SANTOSH SAINIversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

Santosh Saini appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking to quash a Special Judge's order rejecting his anticipatory bail application in a case involving offences under the IPC and the SC/ST Act. The appeal was listed, but no …

Smt. PRATIBHA JAISWALversusSANTOSH JAISWAL

The applicant, Smt. Pratibha Jaiswal, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 1020 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit against Santosh Jaiswal. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the transfer …

SMT. SHALINI SHARMAversusMAYANK SHARMA

Smt. Shalini Sharma filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 1046 of 2023 against Mayank Sharma. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The Court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim order previously …

SURESH SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The revision petition filed by Suresh Sharma against the State of U.P. and others was scheduled for admission, but the petitioner failed to appear on the appointed dates of 10-02-2026 and 09-04-2026, and again on the hearing day. The opposite party counsel highlighted the petitioner's consistent …

AJAY SINGH VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Ajay Singh Verma sought to set aside orders dismissing his discharge application in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case, arguing the lower courts acted illegally. The discharge application had been rejected by a Judicial Magistrate and the subsequent criminal revision was also …

SHRI NATH GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Shri Nath Gupta sought a direction under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code to register an FIR alleging that the respondents had forged signatures on a compromise deed filed in a civil suit. The Special Chief Judicial Magistrate dismissed the application, holding that the …

USMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Usman, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 161 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 64, 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed five days after the incident without any explanation and that there …

MANISHA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Manisha Devi filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside the Allahabad High Court's order dated 21 September 2024, which had annulled a trial court's summons in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The petitioner argued that the respondent had been properly served with …

TASLEEMversusState of UP AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Tasleem filed Writ Petition No. 22067 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petition was argued by counsel Irshad Ahmad and Navin Kumar Srivastava. Respondents were represented by Aditiya Kumar Singh, …

RATAN SONKARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ratan Sonkar, who was charged under Sections 108 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. for allegedly recording and circulating an indecent video of his sister‑in‑law before her death, which the prosecution claimed led to her suicide. The applicant contended …

YOGENDRA SINGH ALIAS HANDRE AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the CrPC and Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a Special Session Trial (No. 55 of 2023) arising from a complaint under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and the SC/ST Act, on the ground that the parties had amicably …

SMT. SWAPNIL ASHOK KUMARversusGAURAV KUMAR

Smt. Swapnil Ashok Kumar filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court against Gaurav Kumar. The applicant's counsel, Digvijay Singh and Sudhir Kumar Singh, did not appear to pursue the application. The court noted the absence of any party to press the transfer request and dismissed the …

FARUKH ALIAS NARGIS KINNARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, a transgender individual, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside orders of the Sessions Judge and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate that dismissed his application under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, alleging extortion over a demanded 'badhai' …

ANJESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anjesh, accused in Crime No. 126 of 2025 under Section 105 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had no medical background, and that the post‑mortem report could not determine the cause of death, with the …

KRISHNA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Krishna Kumar was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case involving alleged violations of the IPC, Income‑Tax Act and Public Gambling Act. He contended that he was not named in the FIR, that the mobile number and transaction attributed to him were false, and that there was no independent or …

MOHD RAFEEQversusSTATE OF U.P.

Mohd Rafeeq applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 11 of 2025) involving alleged offences under the Indian Penal Code, Income Tax Act and Public Gambling Act. He contended that he was not named in the FIR, that the mobile number and transaction attributed to him were false, and that there …

RANVEER KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ranveer Kumar was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case (Crime No. 11 of 2025) based solely on information from an informer, although his name does not appear in the FIR. The applicant contended that the mobile number and alleged transaction attributed to him were false, and that there was …

RAJENDRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Rajendra and Aslam filed an application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. and Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 96 of 2024 (Ram Prasad v. Rajendra) filed under Sections 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(2)(VA) of the SC/ST Act. The application also …

ANIL KUMAR BARANWAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash a summoning order dated 07.03.2025 in a complaint case arising from an FIR lodged on 07.07.2022 under IPC sections 323, 427, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act section 3(1)(da). They alleged that the prosecution case was …

SMT. RAKHI MATHURversusSUMIT KUMAR SAXENA

Smt. Rakhi Mathur filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 485 of 2025 seeking to transfer the suit against Sumit Kumar Saxena. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The High Court observed that the application was not prosecuted and consequently dismissed it for …

M/S CHHONKAR ASSOCIATES MATHURAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The applicant, M/s Chhonkar Associates, filed an arbitration application under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator. The court recorded the consent of former High Court Judge Justice Satish Chandra to act as arbitrator under Section 11(8). …

SMT. ANURADHA AND ANOTHERversusAJAY KUMAR

The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Family Court, Meerut, to decide an execution case within a stipulated period. The petition argued that the Family Court had not acted timely. The Court noted that orders of the Family Court are appealable under Section 19 of …

SARITA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Sarita Devi, the registered owner of a vehicle seized in a cow‑slaughter case, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside the District Magistrate’s order confiscating the vehicle and the subsequent criminal revision order. The petitioner claimed the vehicle was falsely implicated and …

PRANAV SUMANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondent authorities to fix and demarcate Plot No.212A in Greater Noida, relying on a possession certificate dated 28‑09‑2020 and a lease‑hold transfer deed dated 19‑10‑2020. The petitioner also asked the court to compel the …

ALOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Alok Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 11 of 2025) involving alleged offences under the B.N.S., Income Tax Act and Public Gambling Act, but he was not named in the FIR. The applicant contended that the mobile number and transaction attributed to him were false, and that the …

HARISH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A petition under Article 227 (No. 8835 of 2025) was filed by Harish Kumar against the State of U.P. and another respondent. The petitioner was represented by counsel Prakash Veer Tripathi. During the hearing, the petitioner expressed that he no longer wished to pursue the petition. The counsel …

H.K.S. DEVELOPERS PVT LTDversusState of UP AND 4 OTHERS

H.K.S. Developers Pvt Ltd filed a review petition against the Allahabad High Court's order dated 17‑08‑2023 that dismissed its writ petition challenging a title dispute. The petitioner argued that the earlier judgment should be recalled and the writ heard afresh, contending that the court erred in …

DINESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

In Criminal Revision No. 4416 of 2024, Dinesh filed a revision against the State of U.P. and another party. The revisionist's counsel, Balbir Singh and Shailendra Singh, failed to appear at the scheduled hearing on 08.04.2026 and again on the subsequent date. The opposite party, represented by G.A. …

AMIT KUMAR PASWANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant, Amit Kumar Paswan, was charged in a Session Trial for offences under Section 376 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. He married the victim on 17 June 2025, and the victim’s statements under Sections 161 and 164 CrPC indicated no allegation against him and expressed love for …

MANOJ KUMAR PANDEYversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Manoj Kumar Pandey, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking relief. Counsel for the applicant informed the court that the dispute with the State of U.P. had been amicably settled and requested permission to withdraw the writ petition. The court considered whether a …

RAHULversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rahul, who is charged with offences under Sections 304, 308, 452, 376, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR …

SONAMversusARUNESH MURARI

The applicant, Sonam, filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad seeking to transfer the suit against Arunesh Murari. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The court examined whether the application could proceed in the absence of …

LAKHAMI SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Lakhami Singh and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 58212 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 325 IPC. While initially seeking quash, the applicants later …

MANOJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 25 OTHERS

Manoj Kumar filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachments on plot no.186 in Village Rajdharpur, Jaunpur. The petitioner relied on a revenue record showing the plot as a bhita and demanded corrective action. The respondents produced a Deputy District …

SHUBHAM PANDEY AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Shubham Pandey and eight others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire proceedings in State v. Sushil Kumar Pandey (Case No. 9667 of 2024) relating to offences under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the BNS …

SHAKIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the entire criminal proceeding (Session Trial No. 1755 of 2025) arising from a Section 307 IPC case. The applicant later withdrew the merit of the application and only requested permission to move a discharge …

JAGDISH GUPTA AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 31‑08‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 30‑09‑2024, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 9663 of 2024 (State v. Sushil Kumar). During hearing, the applicant’s counsel indicated …

SUNDARAM GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The husband (revisionist) appealed a Family Court order that granted his wife maintenance of Rs 10,000 per month under Section 125 of the CrPC, directing payment from February 2020. He argued that the wife was capable of earning, that the marriage involved dowry disputes, and that she was mentally …

SAMARPALversusPARMAR SINGH AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Samarpal, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 741 of 2024 seeking to move the pending suit to another court. The respondent, Parmar Singh and another, were served with notice of the application. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to prosecute the transfer application. …

SHUBHAM PANDEY AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 27‑08‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 24‑09‑2024, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 9584 of 2024 (State v. Sushil Kumar & others) relating to offences under Sections 303(2) …

NITIN KUMAR DIVYANTversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitin Kumar Divyant, who is charged under IPC sections 409, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B for allegedly withdrawing post‑retirement benefits of a State Bank of India employee via an ATM card. The applicant contended that he was never named in the FIR, …

NEERAJ DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Neeraj Devi, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside the dismissal of her complaint alleging dowry harassment, domestic violence, and related offences by the Judicial Magistrate and the Additional Sessions Judge. She claimed that her husband and in‑laws had demanded …

RAMRAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public‑interest litigation seeking mandamus to delete the entry of Gata No. 46 (a pond) from revenue records and to evict occupants, relying on a letter from the Deputy District Magistrate alleging the entry was fictitious. The court held that mere suspicion expressed by the …

MOHIT SAINI ALIAS ANUBHAV KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohit Saini, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 323, 324 and 504 IPC. He later indicated that he was not pressing any substantive relief and only …

SALATUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachment by private respondent No.6 on two plots in Village Amhawa Khas, Siddharth Nagar. The court noted that the revenue authorities had already removed the partial encroachment and that the plots …

SMT. BHARTI @ RADHAversusAMIT KUMAR

Smt. Bharti (also known as Radha) filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 746 of 2025 against Amit Kumar in the Allahabad High Court. The application sought to transfer the suit to another court. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the transfer. Consequently, the court …

NARAYANI PRASAD SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a mandamus directing certain state officials to take legal action against Respondent No.7 for alleged encroachment on public utility land in Varanasi. The court ordered an inspection, which found no obstruction or encroachment on the …

PRABHATversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Prabhat, who is accused under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act for the alleged recovery of 63.3 kg of ganja from a truck. The applicant argued that the mandatory …

SONAM DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Sonam Devi, who was arrested in a NDNDPS case (Sections 8/20) involving 32.1 kg of ganja. The applicant argued that the mandatory sampling provisions of Section 52‑A of the NDPS …

ATIKURRAHMANversusState of UP AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Atikurrahman, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 05‑09‑2024 passed by respondent No. 4 concerning permission to run a local Tuesday market. The petitioner argued for a direction to allow filing a fresh representation before respondent No. 4 and for a …

ABID ALIAS GABBARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the applicant Abid alias Gabbar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false …

SHIVBABU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shivbabu Yadav, who is charged with murder of his wife under Section 103(1) BNS. The applicant claimed innocence, pointing to discrepancies between the inquest report …

NARENDRA KUMAR SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Narendra Kumar Sharma and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel submitted that no cause of action survived, rendering the petition infructuous. The respondents' counsel raised no objection to this submission. The Court …

SMT. SHUBHAVATI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Shubhavati Devi filed a petition under Article 227 challenging an attachment order passed by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate under Section 146(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The order was based on an application under Section 145 CrPC alleging illegal possession of agricultural land, but the …

VIJAY NARAYAN MISHRAversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

Vijay Narayan Mishra, the petitioner, sought an order for an electricity connection to a house/shop he occupies, while the respondent Gulab Devi Jaiswal claims ownership and has a pending suit for permanent injunction. The court examined the inspection report, which confirmed that Mishra is in …

FARMAN ALIAS BHOOTversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Farman alias Bhoot, who is charged under Section 109 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act for allegedly opening fire on a police party, though no police officer was injured. The applicant has a substantial criminal history, with 21 …

HARVIR SINGHversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Harvir Singh, a contract employee since 2004, claimed that after his termination on 22-02-2025 his employer failed to pay full dues. He invoked the arbitration clause in his contract, but the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents did not respond. The applicant filed an application under …

SANTRAM AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioners Santram and six others filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Deputy Director of Consolidation, District Jalaun, to transmit certain consolidation records and to decide a pending revision. They argued that the Deputy Director had already passed a final order, which they …

ANUJ @ VINOD JATAV @ VINODversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered bail application No. 35494 of 2025 filed by Anuj @ Vinod Jatav @ Vinod, who was arrested in Crime No. 235 of 2024 under Sections 420 and 34 of the IPC. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that no material had been recovered from him, and …

SADDAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Saddam, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 11 September 2016 and the related cognizance order in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 323, 324, 308 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant and the second …

VIKASversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikas, accused in Crime No. 390 of 2024 for offences under IPC sections 147, 302, 307, 34, 504 and 506. The FIR alleged that Vikas and co‑accused assaulted the deceased, who later died, and also injured a witness named Vipin. During …

AKHILESH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Akhilesh Yadav, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 420 and 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code relating to a disputed property transaction. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that he merely returned Rs. 20 lakh to the …

AASTHA SHUKLAversusAKSHAY BHARADWAJ

Aastha Shukla filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 831 of 2024 against Akshay Bharadwaj. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application, while the opposite party's counsel was present. The Court observed that the application was not prosecuted and therefore dismissed it …

SANJE ALIAS SANJEEV AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire proceedings of a POCSO case (Special Case No. 900 of 2025) pending before the Special Judge, Kasganj. After hearing, the applicants' counsel indicated that they no longer …

RAJA QURAISHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raja Quraishi, who was charged under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged cow slaughter offences. The applicant contended …

RAJA QURAISHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raja Quraishi, who was accused under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged cow‑slaughter offences. The applicant claimed the …

X JUVENILEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, a juvenile, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 144 of 2025 pending before the Juvenile Justice Board, Ghaziabad, which involved offences under the Protection of Children from …

DEEPAK ALIAS DEEPAK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Deepak Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 122 of 2025) arising under Section 74 of the same Act and Sections 7 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences …

RAMESH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quash of Criminal Case No. 196 of 2016 (State v. Ramesh & Ors.) relating to offences under Sections 420, 406, 467 and 468 IPC. The High Court had earlier referred the matter to its Mediation and …

KAPIL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and cognizance order in Criminal Case No. 5976 of 2025, alleging that they had reached an amicable compromise with the second opposite party. Both the State’s Additional Government Advocate and the …

SANJAY KUMAR PATELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Sanjay Kumar Patel, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 893 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 506 and 354‑A of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. …

JITENDRA KUSHWAHAversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Jitendra Kushwaha, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 7 February 2024 issued by the Civil Judge (Offence Against Women) in a criminal case involving allegations under Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3 …

RAVINDRA PAL ALIAS RAVINDRA PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ravindra Pal Singh in a 2013 case involving offences under Sections 420, 406, 409, 467, 471 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant pleaded innocence, contended that the allegations were fabricated, and highlighted that the co‑accused had …

IKRAAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 458 of 2025) arising from offences under sections 70(1), 127(2) and 351(3) of the BNSS, on the ground that a verified compromise had been reached with the victim. The trial court had …

SAURABH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Saurabh Kumar Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet and cognizance order dated 30 September 2024 and 19 December 2024 respectively, which alleged offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. …

SHAHZAD AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The applicants, Shahzad and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 7464 of 2024) alleging offences under various IPC sections. They claimed that they had reached an amicable compromise with the …

MOHD SAMEERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohd Sameer, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Allahabad High Court under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The court noted the absence of representation and considered the application …

RANU @ RANA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ranu @ Rana Singh, who was arrested under Sections 399 and 402 of the IPC in a case registered in 2006. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that the police recovery was fabricated, and highlighted the absence of any eye‑witness or …

DORI LAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 693 of 2021) arising from offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act. After hearing, the applicants indicated they no longer wished to pursue …

PARVEZversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Parvez, accused in Crime No. 423 of 2025 under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed the allegations were false and based solely on suspicion, and highlighted that he had previously been granted …

MANOJ NISHADversusUPENDRA KUMAR, DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS AZAMGARH

The High Court had earlier directed the District Inspector of Schools, Azamgarh, to decide a representation filed by the petitioner regarding post-retirement benefits within eight weeks. The petitioner filed a contempt application alleging non‑compliance with that direction. The respondent submitted …

DEEPAKversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak, accused in a case under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant's counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the dispute was essentially civil, with no direct …

VIJAY SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 8 February 2023 and the related criminal proceedings (Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act) pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Mainpuri. The …

ASHOKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Ashok, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 1917 of 2020) arising from alleged offences under Sections 354, 354‑B, 506 of the IPC and Sections 9 and 10 of the POCSO Act. …

JAHID AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Jahid and eight others, were charged in Criminal Case No.25855 of 2022 for offences including rioting, assault and criminal intimidation. They filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quash of the charge sheet dated 28‑08‑2022 and the …

DHEERAJ SAHANIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dheeraj Sahani, who was charged under Sections 69, 93, 352 and 115(2) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly promising marriage to a woman in exchange for the disposal of a newborn girl and then refusing to marry her. The prosecution alleged a …

SMT. RASHMI DUBEY @ SHIV RIDDHIversusPRASHANT AGNIHOTRI @ SHIV

The applicant, Smt. Rashmi Dubey, filed a transfer application in the High Court of Allahabad seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The earlier interim …

Smt LateshversusVinod Kumar AND 7 OTHERS

Smt Latesh filed a transfer application (Civil No. 919 of 2024) in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit against Vinod Kumar and others to another court. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicant to argue or prosecute the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution …

JAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jay Singh, who was arrested on 29‑08‑2025 in connection with Crime No.130 of 2025 under IPC Sections 109 and 115(2) BNS. The applicant claimed false implication, stating he was only alleged to have assaulted an informant whose statement was not …

PAPPU CHAUBEY @ ANEESH CHAUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pappu Chaubey (Aneesh Chaubey) in a case under IPC sections 310(2), 352 and 61(2) BNS. The applicant claimed innocence, lack of incriminating material, and cited that co‑accused had already been granted bail in similar cases. The State opposed …

ABHAY MISHRA AND 2 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 36208 of 2024) arising from a dowry-related complaint under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the Court’s …

ANSHU KUMAR DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Anshu Kumar Dubey, who was charged under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that no recovery was made from his possession, and argued that there were no eye‑witnesses or …

MUKESH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summons order dated 04‑12‑2024 and the charge‑sheet dated 19‑10‑2024 in a POCSO case (Sections 363, 366, 376, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 POCSO Act). They claimed they were …

MOHD. SALMAN SHEKHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohd. Salman Sheikh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No.3059 of 2025, alleging that he had married the victim and that a compromise had been reached and verified by the trial court. The opposite party admitted the marriage, and the …

RAJNISH SINGH @ SAHIL YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rajnish Singh @ Sahil Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 277/2025) under IPC sections 109(1), 303(2), 317(2) and 317(4). He contended that he was falsely implicated and argued that co‑accused who faced the same charges had already been granted bail, invoking the …

RAMVEER AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramveer and another accused in a case involving offences under Sections 333, 191(2), 125, 115(2), 118(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants contended that they were falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record, …

DINESH ALIAS VINOD KUMAR AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 427 of 2022) filed under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the Court’s Mediation Centre, where the parties amicably settled the dispute …

PUSHPENDRA KUMAR ALIAS DEVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Pushpendra Kumar Alias Dev, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 393 of 2024) arising from a POCSO case involving offences under Sections 363, 354, 323, 34 of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The …

JABIR ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 784 of 2018) arising under Sections 66-D, 66-E and 67 of the Information Technology Act. The court noted that the charge‑sheet had already been …

MANISHA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Manisha Singh filed a complaint under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code against Surya Prakash and others. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Ballia dismissed the complaint under Section 203, finding no prima facie case. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed a criminal revision before …

SANJAY AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (S.T. No.280 of 2024 & 08/2025) arising from a case registered under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and 307. They asserted that the dispute had been amicably settled through a compromise and that …