Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 12001–12200
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Amit Kashyap, who was arrested in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that his involvement was limited to assisting an informant in a …
The applicant, Vijay Bahadur, filed a contempt application against Sri Ram Achhivar Chauhan, Deputy Director of Consolidation, alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. The applicant’s counsel, Ram Sagar Yadav, submitted that the writ Court’s order had been fully complied with. The Court …
Rashmi filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move her suit against Ranjeet Kumar to another court. No counsel appeared on her behalf to pursue the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim …
The petitioner filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 42325 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition and sought liberty to file a fresh petition if needed. The respondent’s standing counsel raised no objection to the …
The petitioner, Bijendra Pratap Tiwari, filed Writ No. 42330 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition and sought liberty to file a fresh petition if required. The respondent’s standing counsel raised no …
Bhullan Singh, the accused, filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the order dated 13-10-2025 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahr, which dismissed his discharge application under Section 239 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petition sought to overturn the …
The petitioner, a former Assistant Agriculture Inspector appointed in 1968, was suspended in 1975 following an FIR under Section 409 IPC and subsequently terminated on 30‑12‑1976 after a departmental inquiry. He was acquitted of the criminal charges on 04‑01‑2024 and thereafter wrote to the Director …
The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 42906 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the application, the applicant died, as informed by his counsel, Pradeep Kumar Srivastava. The court considered whether the bail application could continue after …
The applicant, Govind Singh Bhadauriya, filed a contempt application against Shri Sanjeev Kumar, District Basic Education Officer, alleging non‑compliance with a writ order dated 13 May 2022. The respondent appeared before the court and submitted an affidavit of compliance, accompanied by a decision …
The appellants, Sameer Singh and another, appealed under Section 14A(1) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act challenging a summoning order dated 27‑02‑2025 issued by the Special Judge, Varanasi, in case Pappu Sonkar v. Sameer Singh & Ors. The order had summoned them to face trial under IPC …
The applicant, M/s Splash Enterprises, filed a contempt application against Shri P.N. Upadhyay, Zonal Manager of Indian Bank, alleging non‑compliance with a writ order dated 27‑02‑2025. The bank appeared before the court and filed an affidavit of compliance, stating that the writ order had been …
The applicant, Ashok Dangi, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 1232 of 2024) arising from offences under Sections 354-A, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. After hearing, …
The petitioners, Dauli and her husband, are adults who married on 16 January 2026. The father of the first petitioner, a respondent, filed an FIR on 28 October 2025 under Section 87 of the B.N.S. Act, 2023, alleging that the husband had abducted his daughter. The petitioners contended that the FIR …
The applicants, Smt. Krishna and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a criminal charge sheet and proceedings arising from alleged offences under Sections 420, 120B, 342, 504 and 506 IPC. They claimed that the dispute had been amicably settled by …
The applicants, Arshad Ali and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 923 of 2025, which arose from a criminal case under Section 135 of the Electricity Act. During the hearing, the …
Smt. Phekui filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to comply with an order dated 30‑01‑2019 under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The High Court disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage, directing the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority …
Vikas was arrested in a murder case under Section 302 IPC for the death of his wife. The prosecution alleged that Vikas quarrelled with the deceased and murdered her, while the defence claimed the wife accidentally fell from a balcony and Vikas merely took her to hospital. The defence highlighted …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Smt. Jameela, the mother‑in‑law of the deceased, in Crime No.152 of 2023, which alleged her involvement under Sections 498‑A, 323 and 304‑B of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant contended that …
The petitioner, Prashant Kumar Meena, filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Special Judge (DDA Act) dated 12 November 2025, which dismissed his application for discharge in a case under Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the Delhi Development Authority Act. The petitioner argued that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Shyam, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that …
The applicant, Rakesh Verma, sought to quash Criminal Case No. 3727 of 2008 (State vs. Rakesh Verma) arising from offences under Sections 363 and 366 IPC, on the ground that the dispute had been amicably settled with the second opposite party. Both parties, through their counsel, submitted that a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal case No.118 of 2018 (State vs. Nasir et al.) on the ground that they had reached an amicable compromise. The State and the second opposite party did not contest the existence of the compromise and were …
The applicants, Shoyab and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 2394 of 2023) arising from Crime No. 107 of 2023, which involved offences under Sections 363, 366A, 120B of the IPC and Sections 16/17 of the POCSO Act. …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove an encroachment on Plot No. 640 (0.840 hectare) in Village Hansrajpur, Prayagraj. The Deputy District Magistrate appeared with an affidavit stating that the temporary structure erected by the encroacher, Vijay …
Nageena Yadav filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the dismissal of her criminal complaint by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 203 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner failed to appear at the last two hearings, and no counsel was present …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash and stay the criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 22 of 2024 (Rammoorat v. Manoj Maheshwari et al.) which involved charges under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and the SC/ST Act. During arguments the counsel for the …
The applicant, Smt Neelam, filed a transfer application (Civil No. 42 of 2024) seeking to move the suit to another court. The opposite party, Vishal Bharti, was served with notice of the application. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the transfer request. The High Court …
In a civil transfer application (No. 59 of 2024) filed by Smt. Anamika Singh against Sh. Anurag Vyas, the applicant's counsel, Shailesh Kumar Mishra, failed to appear before the court to pursue the application. The High Court noted the absence of any representation on behalf of the applicant and …
The applicant, Kusum Vishwakarma, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 77 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the Court observed that the application was not prosecuted. The …
The applicant, Smt. Archana, filed a transfer application (Civil No. 91 of 2024) seeking to move the suit to another court. The respondent, Himanshu Dahiya, was served with notice of the application. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the transfer. The High Court …
Akanksha Sharma filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking transfer of the suit. No counsel appeared on her behalf to prosecute the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted …
Neetu Singh filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on her behalf to pursue the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The court also vacated any interim order …
Smt Purnima Srivastava filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 135 of 2024 against Vijendra Lal Srivastava in the Allahabad High Court. The applicant was represented by counsel Jagdish Prasad Mishra, while no counsel appeared for the opposite party. No one appeared on behalf of the applicant to …
Smt Manju Jaiswar filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 146 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while the opposite party's counsel was present. The Court observed that the application was not prosecuted. Consequently, …
The applicant, Smt Jyoti, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 189 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the Court found that the application was not prosecuted. The Court dismissed the transfer application …
Rubi Kumari filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 218 of 2024 against Pushpendra in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application, while counsel for the opposite party was present. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the transfer …
The applicant, Pooja Singh, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 250 of 2024 in the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit to another court. The applicant was represented by counsel Harsh Narayan Singh, while no counsel appeared for the opposite party, Vikash Singh. No one appeared on …
Petitioner Mohammad Tayyab filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No.15187 of 2021 against the Commissioner Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda and another. No appearance was made on behalf of the petitioner and the petitioner’s counsel indicated loss of interest in pursuing the case. The Court invoked the …
The husband, Shailesh Kumar Raina, challenged an order dated 8 December 2016 of the Family Court, Gorakhpur, which had partially allowed a Section 125 Cr.P.C. application by his wife and minor daughter, fixing monthly maintenance of Rs 8,000 and Rs 5,000 respectively. Subsequently, a separate …
In Criminal Appeal No. 849 of 2001 (Raj Bahadur v. State of U.P.), the appellant and the State agreed to settle the dispute out of court and filed a joint affidavit evidencing a compromise between the appellant, the informant Punjab Singh, and the injured witness Rampati. The High Court, after …
The applicants, Krishna Mohan Shukla and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS against the State of U.P. and another party. The applicants failed to appear before the court on the original date and also on the revised call dated 28 April 2025. The learned Additional …
Sunita Singh and another appealed against a Special Court order that partially rejected their discharge application under Section 227 Cr.P.C., leaving them charged under Sections 417, 420 IPC and Section 3(2)(5a) of the SC/ST Act. They contended that Section 3(2)(5a) could not apply because the …
Petitioner Rajesh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 13-10-2024 and the cognizance order dated 30-01-2025 in State v. Rupesh, which involved offences under Sections 110 and 352 of the IPC. The parties had already reached a …
The petitioner, Balbir Singh, filed a writ petition challenging his own transfer order as well as that of Respondent‑5. The court noted that notice to Respondent‑5 had been issued but no service report was on record, and there was no interim order. Considering these procedural deficiencies, the …
The petitioner, Ramakant, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State of U.P. and others responded, indicating that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The petitioners argued that …
Petitioner Sonu Malik alleged that six accused entered her house on 17 April 2024 and raped her while she was pregnant, and she applied under Section 173(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code for registration of an FIR. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate dismissed the application, relying on the …
The petitioner, Saddam, filed a criminal revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an order dated 29 January 2026 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad, which dismissed his application for discharge in a trial under multiple statutes. The trial involved …
The petitioner, Farhan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its …
The High Court heard a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC challenging a Family Court order dated 5 March 2024 that granted modest maintenance of Rs.3,000 to the wife and Rs.2,500 to her minor son under Section 125 of the CrPC. The wife alleged dowry harassment, forced abortion, …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Consolidation Officer to first record statements of primary witnesses and then secondary witnesses, and to decide an application filed under Section 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 within a stipulated …
Petitioner Uljhan Singh Bind filed an application under Section 173(4) of the BNSS, 2023 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Prayagraj, seeking registration of an FIR and investigation. The magistrate treated the application as a complaint case and declined to exercise jurisdiction to register an …
The applicant Arvind Prajapati filed an application under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 538 of 2024) arising from FIR No. 563 of 2023 alleging offences under IPC sections 363 and 366 and the POCSO Act. The applicant proved that he had married the victim …
The petitioners, Smt. Kamala Devi Desharwani and others, filed a civil revision (No. 347 of 2009) against Dakkhi Lal Jaiswal. Three counsels were appointed for the revisionists, but only one appeared, while the other two were absent without filing any adjournment request. The respondent's counsel, …
The petitioner, Gram Sabha Mathiya Gosai, filed a PIL seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachments by private respondents on plots recorded as Chakmarg in Village Mathiya Gosai, Basti district. The petitioner argued that an earlier order dated 04.08.2025 had already demarcated the land, …
The applicant, Mohd. Abu Obaida Mansoori, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑07‑2022 and the cognizance order dated 09‑05‑2023 in a criminal case pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 4, Allahabad, alleging …
Israr Ahmad filed Writ A No. 3937 of 2003 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of U.P. However, no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The court observed that the petitioner seemed uninterested in pursuing the matter and that the petition had …
The appellant, Sanoj Kumar, filed a first appeal against an order of the Union of India (Northern Railway) but failed to appear before the court. No counsel was present to press the appeal and no request for adjournment was made. The High Court noted the lack of prosecution of the appeal. …
Tanuja Khare filed a civil contempt application against Dr. Mahendra Dev and others, alleging non‑payment of interest at 7% per annum. The District Inspector of Schools, Unnao, testified that the interest had already been forwarded to the treasury on 14 March 2024 and produced a copy of the order. …
Smt. Dulari filed a writ petition (WRIT‑B No. 7059 of 1982) against D.D.C. and others. The petition remained pending for decades. On the hearing dated 29‑03‑2023, no counsel appeared for the petitioner, and the petitioner was reported to have lost interest in pursuing the case. The respondent’s …
The appellants Chandra Prakash and others appealed under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C. against a judgment that convicted them under IPC Sections 323/34 and 325/34 and released them on probation under Section 5 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, with sureties. The appellants argued that the …
The appellant Kapil Kumar was charged under Sections 302, 201 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act for the alleged murder of his father, Sheeshpal, which the prosecution claimed was a homicide disguised as a road accident. Subsequent investigations, including a Special Investigation Team report …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 24‑04‑2023 issued by the Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) in a complaint alleging criminal breach of trust under Section 406 IPC for alleged non‑payment of earned wages and leave. The opposite party claimed …
The petitioner, Pinki Triapthi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …
The appellants Kadir Ali and Mustafa were convicted under Section 504 IPC for criminal intimidation arising from a property‑partition dispute that led to the death of Afzal. The trial court sentenced them to six months' rigorous imprisonment and a fine. On appeal, the appellants did not contest the …
An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Vinod Kumar Verma and another against the State of U.P. and another. The counsel for the applicants, Babu Lal Ram, Kamalesh Kumar Nishad, Om Prakash Singh, and Renu Singh, were listed, but none appeared before the court on …
Virendra Patel filed a revision petition challenging a Family Court order that awarded his wife maintenance of Rs 5,000 per month under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He does not dispute the amount but seeks the court’s permission to pay the arrears of approximately Rs 2,40,000 in …
The applicant, Bhaiya Lal, was arrested in connection with Crime No. 424 of 2025 under Sections 109(1) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. for alleged assault with a lathi-danda and axe. He claimed innocence, stating that no specific role was assigned to him in the FIR and that no incriminating material was …
The petitioners, Jarisha Khatoon and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Rajiv Sisodia, announced that the petitioners no …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 08.12.2025 and to stay the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 931 of 2025) arising from FIR No. 69 of 2025 under Sections 324(2), 351(3) and 352 of the BNS. They alleged false implication …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Laxmi Shankar Upadhyay, who was charged under Sections 8, 21 and 60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for allegedly possessing 950 grams of heroin. The applicant contended that the seizure was illegal, no heroin was …
The High Court heard a civil revision filed under Section 115 CPC challenging the trial court’s dismissal of an impleadment application against the plaintiff, Smt Poonam Singh, in an original suit concerning a disputed plot of land. The revisionist, M/s Super Cloud Pvt Ltd, argued that it was a …
The applicants, Prabhunath Tiwari and two others, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 905 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. The counsel for the applicants, Hari Narayan Singh, did not appear before the court. The opposite parties, represented by Amar Nath …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet and cognizance/summoning order dated 13‑09‑2024 and 11‑12‑2025 in a case where the accused was charged under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant contended, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dinesh, accused in a murder case under several sections of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was only implicated through statements of other victims, and that no specific role was assigned to him; he also pointed …
The petitioner, Pradeep Kumar Sharma, was appointed to a short‑term vacancy on 20‑01‑1995 and his request for regularisation was denied. He contended that the Government Order dated 04‑10‑2024, issued pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decision in Vinod Kumar Srivastava v. State of U.P. (Writ‑A …
Lalit Kaushik applied for bail in a criminal case (No. 350/2024) under Sections 137(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging that he was falsely implicated and that the FIR was filed due to political rivalry. The State contended that Kaushik, together with his nephew, abducted the …
The State of Uttar Pradesh filed a review application under Article 226 challenging the High Court's order dated 02‑11‑2023 which dismissed Smt. Krishna Singh’s writ petition for ex‑gratia compensation of Rs.50 lakh under the Government Order of 11‑04‑2020. The State argued that the original order …
Petitioners Siksha Gupta and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the …
The petitioner, Monu, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The …
The petitioners, Krishna Gopal and two others, filed a writ petition (WRIT-A No. 2015 of 2003) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, and the case list was subsequently revised. The Court observed that the petition …
Smt. Gyanwati filed a writ petition against the Additional Commissioner Judicial, Faizabad. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the petition, although the learned Standing Counsel was present. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the writ …
The applicant, Aditya Narayan Srivastav, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The application was to be heard before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No counsel or party appeared to press the application before the court. Consequently, the …
The appellants, Shanker Lal and Har Govind, were convicted under IPC sections 147, 148, 149 and 325 and sentenced to up to two years' rigorous imprisonment. They sought relief on the ground that, given the non‑serious nature of the offences, lack of prior convictions and the considerable delay since …
The appellant, Bharat Singh, was convicted by a Sessions Court in 1987 for offences under Sections 148, 149 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to a total of two years' rigorous imprisonment. He appealed, not contesting the conviction, but seeking the benefit of probation under Section 4 …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel was not present, and no interim order had been passed. The court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as …
The appellant, Saroj Rathore, was charged with murdering a young woman by hanging her after she returned from her marriage, as alleged in an FIR filed by her father. The appellant sought bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, claiming …
The applicant, Neeraj Srivastava, filed an application under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against Manoj Rastogi. The matter was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, with counsel Vishesh Rajvanshi for the applicant and Syed Ali Murtaza for the …
The petitioner, M/s Triveni Engineering and Industries Ltd., filed a civil miscellaneous application seeking disposal of its writ petition on the ground that a settlement had been reached with respondent No.3, Neeraj Tyagi, before the Assistant Labour Commissioner, U.P., Muzaffarnagar on 03‑02‑2026. …
The petitioner, Khwaja Shamshad Ahmad, filed Writ Petition No. 16114 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State Information Commission, Uttar Pradesh and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Sagheer Ahmad, subsequently moved the Court seeking withdrawal of the …
The petitioners sought a direction from the Allahabad High Court to compel the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Gautam Budh Nagar to dispose of Suit No. 652 of 2022 within a stipulated time, alleging irreparable loss if delayed. The Court examined prior authority, notably Ali Shad Usmani v. Ali …
Petitioner Sahmat Ali filed a writ petition challenging the impoundment of his passport. The respondents argued that the Passport Act, 1967 provides a specific statutory remedy—an appeal under Section 11—against such an order. The Court held that because an alternative statutory remedy exists, the …
The applicant filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order in Case No. 40763 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant contended, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. v. State of Uttar …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 24‑01‑2024 in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant alleged that he never issued a cheque for a Rs.7,00,000 loan and that the proceeding was a malicious …
The petitioner, Anupam Dwivedi, filed a public interest litigation seeking eviction of private respondents from Arazi No.2213/0.137 hectare, despite a pending civil suit (Mansoor Ahmad v. State of U.P., Suit No.1277 of 1999) and an interim status‑quo order dated 20‑12‑1999. The earlier writ petition …
Mintoo Prasad filed a public interest litigation challenging alleged unauthorized possession of land (gata no.1) by private respondents. The State's standing counsel submitted that demarcation proceedings had already identified Brij Lal, not Chanda Devi, as the unauthorized possessor, and that Brij …
The petitioner, Rajveer, filed a public interest litigation (PIL) before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Sunil Kumar Singh, prayed for withdrawal of the writ petition. The counsel for respondent No.5 and the Standing Counsel for the State-Respondents raised no …
The applicant, Shyam Singh Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant later expressed a desire to withdraw the application and sought liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. The Court considered …
The applicants, Rajesh Kumar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and summons in a criminal case and to obtain bail. The State opposed the quash but offered protection if the applicants surrendered. The Court, noting the alternative …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Chief Registrar, Firms, Societies and Chits, U.P., to decide representations submitted on 18‑06‑2025 and 16‑07‑2025 within a fixed period. The petitioner’s counsel also requested permission to file a fresh representation and a …
The appeal filed by M/s Hapur Roller Flour Mills challenged the order of the Additional District Judge which had set aside a prior order dismissing the suit for permanent injunction. The appellant argued that the respondents had altered the partnership without consent, violating Clause 19 of the …
The petitioner, Naveen Kumar Shrivastava, filed a writ petition challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal's (CAT) order that closed his contempt proceedings, alleging the respondents had not granted the full Assured Career Progression (ACP/MACP) benefits ordered on 12‑04‑2024. The High Court …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance taken by the Judicial Magistrate in a case alleging offences under several IPC sections arising from a village election dispute. The State argued that the FIR, …
The applicant, Anil Kumar Srivastava, filed a civil contempt application against Muni Raj, Deputy Inspector General of Police, Ayodhya. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, before Hon’ble Justice Manish Kumar. Neither the applicant’s counsel nor any representative …
The appellant, Om Prakash Tiwari, filed a first appeal against an order of the National Insurance Company Ltd. and others. The appeal was listed but the appellant failed to appear before the court on the revised date. The court noted that no representative of the appellant was present in the revised …
The applicant, Sadrun Nisha, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The issue before the court was whether the application could be entertained in the absence of any …
The appellants Mahipal and others filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on their behalf to argue the appeal. The court received a report dated 27 April 2026 indicating that all the appellants had died, as confirmed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra. Since …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code for Shishupal Singh, who was charged under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) in a land‑fraud case. The applicant argued that he was merely the purchaser of the land, had paid full …
The applicant, Srikant Pandey, filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the order of the Judicial Magistrate‑I, Jaunpur dated 02‑11‑2020, which had rejected his discharge application in a criminal case under Sections 419 and 420 IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the …
Ashok Kumar filed a revision petition challenging the dismissal of his Section 239 Cr.P.C discharge application in a criminal case involving alleged forgery, fraud, and conspiracy under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B. The petitioner argued that he was implicated only because he is the …
The Allahabad High Court examined a public‑interest litigation filed by Advocate Ravindra Ahlawat seeking removal of alleged encroachments by Daurala Sugar Mill on a canal road. The Court found that the petitioner had concealed his prior role as Chairman of the Cane Development Council and had …
The applicants Kishun Yadav and six others filed an application under Section 528 of the Bihar Negotiable Settlement Scheme (BNSS) seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 2260 of 2021 (State v. Kishan Yadav et al.) which involved offences under several IPC sections. Both parties had reconciled …
Nikhil Tiwari, the accused, filed a revision petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order dated 08‑12‑2025 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhansi, which had rejected the final report and allowed a protest petition against him in a criminal case under Sections …
The revisionist Sandeep Yadav filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Special Judge that rejected his application for release of a seized vehicle. The trial court had dismissed the application under Section 451 of the Criminal Procedure Code because it was not filed by the vehicle’s …
Petitioner Raju filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 8 December 2025, which dismissed his complaint under Section 203 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The High Court examined whether it could entertain the revision …
The petitioners filed a revision against the Judicial Magistrate's order dismissing their discharge application under Section 245(2) of the Cr.P.C. The High Court noted that revision jurisdiction is concurrent with the Sessions Court but ordinarily requires the litigant to approach the Sessions …
The petitioners, Yogendra Kumar @ Jony and three others, filed a criminal revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging a Sessions Judge's order dated 30 January 2026 that dismissed their application for discharge under Section 250 of the B.N.S.S. After the dismissal, the charges were …
Petitioner Rajendra Kumar Sharma filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly, which dismissed his application under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code for registration of an FIR. The High Court examined whether it …
Mohd. Suhail Qureshi filed a criminal revision petition challenging the order dated 3 December 2025 of the Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) that dismissed his application for discharge in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The petitioner argued that the order was …
The applicant, Gaurav Kumar Gupta, challenged a summoning order dated 27‑01‑2025 that named him as an accused under Sections 406, 504 and 506 IPC in a complaint filed by a business associate over an alleged unpaid debt of Rs 4,17,030. The applicant argued that the complaint lacked the essential …
The High Court heard bail applications filed by two accused, Dheeraj Sahni and Satendra Sahni, in a criminal case (Crime No. 299 of 2025) involving alleged assault and grievous injuries. Dheeraj Sahni’s counsel voluntarily withdrew his bail plea, leading the court to dismiss the application as …
The applicant, Mohd Asif, filed an application under Section 528 seeking to amend the prayer clause of his earlier application because the cognizance order dated 06‑06‑2025 was inadvertently omitted. He prayed to quash both the chargesheet dated 01‑03‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order, …
The appellants challenged the summoning order dated 19‑07‑2025 and the Special Sessions Trial proceedings, alleging that the FIR initially described a simple assault and later was altered to include caste‑based allegations without any supporting evidence. They argued that the informant’s statements …
The petitioner, Rajeev Madan, filed a revision petition under Section 127(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging an order dated 04.08.2022 passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Saharanpur, which had dismissed his application 3‑A. The revision sought to set aside the …
The application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was filed by Jatin Chauhan against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The counsel for the applicant was Shekhar Singh and for the opposite parties were G.A. and Preete Chaudhary. The matter was listed before Hon'ble …
The petitioner, Ratan Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Superintendent of Police, Mainpuri, to ensure a fair and expeditious investigation of an FIR dated 31.01.2026 under several sections of the B.N.S. The petitioner alleged that the police were …
The applicant, Vijendra Pratap Singh, aged 66, sought enlargement of bail in a trial concerning FIR No. 222 of 2025, which alleged his involvement in a violent assault resulting in grievous injuries and amputation of the victim's left arm. The FIR was lodged 23 days after the alleged incident, and …
The applicant, Pawan, was arrested in connection with crime no. 41 of 2026 under Sections 352, 351(3) and 109(1) of the B.N.S. and filed a bail enlargement application. He pleaded that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR only named four persons without assigning him a specific role, and that …
The petitioner claimed that an oral agreement to sell a house, for which he paid Rs. 6 lakh, was breached by the respondents who neither executed the sale deed nor returned the money. He filed a complaint under Section 175(3) of the BNSS, which the magistrate dismissed as a civil matter, and …
The petitioner alleged that his brother fabricated a forged mortgage deed on a ten‑rupee stamp paper after their father's death, purportedly to obtain illegal possession of agricultural land. He filed an application under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a police FIR, which the …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 10‑07‑2019 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in a complaint under Section 406 IPC. The complaint alleged that the applicants had misappropriated money given by the complainant for …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Charge Sheet No. 751 of 2018) arising from offences under Sections 308, 323, 504 and 506 IPC, on the ground that the matter had been compromised between the parties. The State’s A.G. did not …
Rajesh, who is in jail since 9‑Dec‑2024 for offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 109, 127(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., applied for enlargement of bail during trial. This is his second bail application; the first was rejected by Justice Gautam Chowdhary on …
The petitioner, Ankit, filed a writ petition (WRIT-A No. 140 of 2008) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The petitioner’s counsel, H.G.S. Parihar, was absent on the hearing date, while the respondent’s counsel appeared. The court …
Amita Yadav filed a writ petition (WRIT-A No. 5051 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petition was to be heard on 7 November 2024. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and no request for adjournment …
The High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS filed by Nitin Choudhary, who was in custody for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 379, 34, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, citing two earlier police closure reports and contradictory forensic …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 20‑07‑2018 issued by Judicial Magistrate‑I, Gorakhpur, and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 1050 of 2017) for offences under Sections 323, 452, 504 and 506 IPC. The dispute arose from …
Mst. Ram Sakhi filed writ petition No. 3174 of 1979 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the list was revised. The court noted the absence of the petitioner’s representation and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim …
Ravindra Kumar appealed his conviction and three‑year rigorous imprisonment under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. He sought release on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, arguing that the offence carried a maximum sentence of two years and that he had no …
A writ petition (WRIT-B No. 472 of 1982) was filed by Ranche against the Board of Revenue and others. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while counsel for the respondent was present. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have …
The appellants Rishipal and Ram Bharosey filed a criminal appeal (No. 520 of 1986) against a judgment dated 30 January 1986 passed by the Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Budaun, under IPC Sections 324, 323 and 34. The appeal was pending for many years when a report dated 24 April 2026 indicated that …
Krishna Pal and Mahendra Pal were convicted by a Sessions Court for offences under IPC sections 323 and 324 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment and a fine. They appealed under Section 374 CrPC, contending that the trial court failed to consider the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and Section 360 …
The applicants Salman Khan, Gulshan Khan, Irfan Khan and Nikhat Khan filed a Section 482 application seeking to quash the charge sheet and summons in a criminal case alleging dowry harassment, cruelty and assault under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Women …
Devendra Kumar Maurya appealed the trial court's rejection of his application for a temporary injunction, seeking to declare a 2013 registered sale deed in favour of Tanvez Alvi void and to assert ownership based on a 1998 agreement and a verbal sale agreement of 2012. The High Court examined …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shuaib, who was arrested in connection with a murder‑related case (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 7462 of 2025) under several IPC sections. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the only allegation against …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Almuddin, accused in Crime No. 386 of 2024 under Section 103(1) of the BNS for allegedly running over a deceased with a tractor. The applicant argued that the death was accidental, that key eyewitnesses did not support the prosecution, …
The appellants sought to amend and substitute the deceased defendant Arun Kumar Swaroop in a civil suit for permanent injunction, filing application 34‑Ka in a miscellaneous proceeding. The trial court found that the plaintiff had repeatedly delayed the case, filed the substitution application …
Ashu Dubey appealed to the Allahabad High Court seeking relief from an order directing the release of Rs 2,00,000 deposited with the court’s Mediation Centre. The parties had earlier been referred to mediation, where they settled their matrimonial dispute, filed a joint divorce petition under …
Ashu Dubey appealed against the dissolution of his marriage to Preeti Dubey. The respondent filed a joint petition under Section 13‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the Family Court, Jaunpur (Case No.1465 of 2023), which was granted on 27 May 2025, dissolving the marriage. The appellant …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Ajeet Singh, who is accused under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his uncle. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, citing lack of eyewitnesses and alleging that the recovered weapon was found three hours after the incident, …
Petitioner Shashima Maurya filed a writ petition (WRIT-A No. 51005 of 2012) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The petition was listed, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The learned Standing Counsel for the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 17‑12‑2024, the cognizance order dated 20‑12‑2024, and the entire Session Trial No.433 of 2025 relating to offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 351, 351(3) and 352 of the B.N.S. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149 and 307, alleging that the parties had reached an amicable compromise verified by the magistrate. Both sides admitted the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Rajat, who is charged under IPC sections 103(1), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 333 and 140(3) BNS for the death of his sister‑in‑law. The applicant claimed the incident was an accident that occurred during a family dispute, asserting that he …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sushil Kumar and Vishnu (Vinay) in a murder case (Sections 302 and 201 IPC) where the deceased was reported missing in July 2023 and a skeleton was recovered in May 2024. The DNA report presented by the A.G. showed a partial profile …
The High Court of Allahabad dismissed a criminal revision filed by Inaam Illahi challenging a Family Court order that granted maintenance of Rs.5,000 per month to his wife and Rs.2,000 per month to their minor daughter under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The husband claimed poverty, …
The applicants Lakhan Singh and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 131, 351(2) and 352 of the IPC. The parties had amicably settled the …
The applicant Vinay Pratap filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel appeared for the applicant and the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The court observed that the application was not prosecuted and therefore dismissed it. …
Munni Devi appealed against an order dated 22‑07‑2025 that initiated forfeiture proceedings under Section 446 of the CrPC against her as surety for accused Liyaqat Ali. The accused had failed to appear, leading to non‑bailable warrants, but later surrendered on 13‑10‑2025 and was taken into custody. …
The applicants, including Shabab, were charged in a criminal case under Sections 498A, 323, 506, 313 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, arising from a complaint by the wife of Shabab. After investigation and framing of charges, the parties reached an out‑of‑court settlement on …
Puneet @ Nanne, accused of double murder under IPC sections 452, 307, 302 and 325, had been in custody since October 2022. His first bail plea was rejected, but he filed a second application arguing lack of criminal history, that only five of eighteen prosecution witnesses had been examined, and …
The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 4887 of 2019) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 307, 328 and 354 IPC. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court compromise dated 16 October 2021, which was verified by the trial …
The applicant, Jainuddin, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Criminal Case No. 287 of 2021) under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleges that the deceased was last seen with the applicant, and blood‑stained clothing and a weapon recovered from the scene …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mahendra, accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 307 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 352, 351(3), 338, 318(4) and 336(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant's counsel argued that the FIR was essentially a civil dispute, that …
The appellants Vimal Kumar and Ramsajivan appealed against an order of the Special Judge granting anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 304 and 328 of the IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellants sought to set aside the order and also requested …
The applicant, Saurabh @ Gola, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 77 of 2026) under Section 117(3) of the B.N.S., alleging false implication in an assault where the victim was struck on the head with a brick, resulting in loss of vision. He contended that he had no specific role …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vishal Kumar Yadav and Sheetal Srivastava, who were arrested in connection with a robbery alleged under Sections 310(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 20 of 2020 (Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC) on the ground that they had entered into a fresh compromise deed dated 9 April 2026, which was verified by the Additional Chief Judicial …
The appellant was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences for allegedly assaulting and abusing a Scheduled Caste woman in an agricultural field at night. The appellant contended that the "public view" element required by Section …
The revisionists, Smt. Urmila Yadav and another, filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order dated 26‑09‑2023 that denied their claim for arrears of maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. They argued that a 17‑02‑2022 High Court direction to adjust amounts already paid should extend …
Ramraj filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order that granted his wife Rs 4,000 per month as maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. He contended that the trial court failed to frame any issue or make a finding on the wife’s alleged unchastity, which is a statutory bar to …
The petitioners sought a writ to challenge the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 285 of 2025, alleging their involvement based on the FIR under Section 108 BNS. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The police had already …
The petitioner, Smt. Manju, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the charge sheet filed in Crime No. 285 of 2025 under Section 108 BNS. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance order and the entire criminal proceeding (Criminal Case No. 13781 of 2025) arising from a charge sheet under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 and 120B of the IPC. The parties had reached a compromise on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 4999 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 147, 148, 325, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached a compromise on 28 January 2026, and the trial court …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Rajveer and seven others seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 4280 of 2025) relating to offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 325, 352, 504 and 506. The applicants asserted …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd Ayub, who is charged under Sections 74, 64(1), 351(3), 103(1) BNS of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67 of the Income Tax Act in Crime No. 76 of 2025. The applicant claimed that his wife died accidentally in the bathroom and denied any …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and related orders dated January‑February 2007 in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 195, 211, 218, 220, 323, 343 and 120B of the IPC. They asserted that the dispute with the State and …
Madhu and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 285 of 2025 under Section 108 BNS. No petitioner appeared before the court; only the Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The court …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (S.T. No.1253 of 2025) arising from a case involving offences under Sections 109(1), 333, 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicants and the opposing parties (Nos.2 and 3) had reached …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 511 of 2021) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court compromise on 21 August 2025, which was verified by …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 10641 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties claimed they had settled the dispute out of court and the opposite party was ready to …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal case (Criminal Case No. 4735 of 2018) pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Azamgarh, which arose from FIR 0054 of 2018 alleging offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 and 354B of the IPC. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 4352 of 2025) arising from Crime No. 589 of 2024, which involved several non‑compoundable offences. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court compromise, which was verified by the …
Petitioner Awdhesh Kumar Pandey filed Writ Petition No. 1936 of 2002 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The court noted that the petition was not prosecuted. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. The …
The petitioners, Ram Dhani and others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The court earlier ordered the petitioners to engage new counsel on 08-09-2017. A notice was subsequently issued, and an N.E.C. (non-emptied cover) was sent on 05-08-2022, but no acknowledgment or response …
The appellant Kamta Singh was convicted by a Sessions Court for assaulting Sukhdev Singh, resulting in injuries that could have led to culpable homicide, under Section 308 IPC and sentenced to four years' rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the High Court examined the evidence, including eyewitness …
The appellants, tenants in a rent dispute, fired at their landlord, Jagdish Narayan, causing only superficial abrasions. The trial court convicted them under Section 307 IPC for attempted murder and sentenced them to three years' rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the High Court examined the …
The appellants were convicted by a Sessions Court under Section 394 IPC for voluntarily causing hurt while committing robbery and sentenced to five years' rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the High Court examined the evidence, noting that no eyewitness or medical testimony directly linked the …
The police, acting on a tip, apprehended Ram Das and his companions while they were preparing to commit dacoity and recovered country‑made pistols. He was charged under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act, convicted and sentenced to seven years' …
Sangita Devi filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 3712 of 2018) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. However, no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the petition. The Court noted the absence of representation and, under procedural rules, dismissed the …
The petitioner, Rani Devi, filed Writ Petition No. 5399 of 2018 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and four other respondents. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The court noted the …
The petitioners Yash Pandey and others, who are accused in Complaint Case No.6433 of 2023 (Shivam Pandey v. Yash Pandey), filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings for offences under Sections 352, 504 and 506 IPC. The complaint alleged that the …
The petitioners, The Arya Vidya Sabha Azamgarh and four others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners moved that the petition be withdrawn as it had become infructuous. The court considered the withdrawal application and found no …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Shri Rajiv Kumar Mishra, applied to withdraw the petition, stating it had become infructuous. The court entertained the withdrawal application and allowed it. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kanhaiya Lal, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged physical assault causing grievous injuries to the victim, Abhimanyu. The applicant's counsel argued that the injuries were simple, the applicant was falsely implicated, …
Petitioner Radhey Shyam filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 10393 of 2023) seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 08‑06‑2023 issued by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Aligarh, and a mandamus directing the State to refund an amount deducted from his funds. The petitioner’s counsel, Amit …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 05.10.2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 17.10.2025, and the entire criminal proceedings of Session Trial No.805 of 2025 relating to offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 74 …
The petitioners filed a writ petition and later sought to withdraw it, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition. The court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with the court granting the petitioners permission to refile a …
