Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 12201–12400
The applicants, Vinod Kumar Gupta and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash Criminal Case No.569 of 2016, which arose from a 2015 offence under Sections 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants claimed that they had reconciled …
The appellants challenged the award of compensation granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in respect of the death of Smt. Ramvati, a housewife, in a road accident involving the Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation. The claim was filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act for …
The applicant Yogendra Singh filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 289 of 2023) arising from an FIR lodged on 24-10-2022 alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust in relation to a tractor rented in 2011. The charge sheet under Section 406 …
The petitioners, Naseem Bux and two others, were accused in Criminal Case No. 252 of 2000 and were transferred to the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) at Lalitpur by a High Court order dated 13‑08‑2004, which directed that the case be treated as an inquiry proceeding. The CJM later dismissed …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners applied to withdraw the petition, stating it had become infructuous. The court entertained the withdrawal application and allowed it. Consequently, the writ petition was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 2009 of 2020) arising from offences under Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties had entered into a voluntary compromise, which was verified by the Chief Judicial …
Murtuza filed an application under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code alleging that parties had illegally occupied his land and assaulted his minor daughter. The Additional District and Sessions Judge treated the 156(3) application as a complaint, dismissed it, and ordered a statement …
The petitioners, Sweta and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioners, while the State's Advocate General was present. The Court noted the absence of prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the writ petition …
The revisionist Murtaza filed a criminal revision under sections 397/401 CrPC against the order of the Additional Sessions Judge (Special Judge POCSO) dated 30‑09‑2024, which dismissed his complaint under section 203 CrPC for non‑appearance. He alleged that the trial court dismissed the complaint …
The applicant, Kushvendra Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an interim maintenance order of Rs.7,500 per month granted by the Meerut Family Court in a Section 125 Cr.P.C. case. He alleged that the opposite party, his alleged wife, had fabricated a marriage …
The petitioners, Ram Surat and others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The respondents, D.D.C. and others, were represented by counsel. The court noted that the cause list dated 07.01.2025 incorrectly named the respondent's counsel. An order dated 3.12.2024 directed that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of Uttar Pradesh was present. The Court noted the absence of …
The petitioners, Aslam Khan and others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 6824 of 2017) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter, originally filed in 2017, was listed before the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court on 28 January …
The petitioner, Gulzar, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear before the court and did not file a vakalatnama authorizing counsel. The court issued a notice for the petitioner to engage another counsel, but no response was received. The standing counsel for the …
The petitioner, Kamta Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that the case was listed for priority hearing but the petitioner failed to appear and had not filed a vakalatnama authorizing counsel. A notice was issued to the petitioner to engage another counsel, …
A writ petition (Writ B No. 14069 of 1982) was listed for priority hearing before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared before the court, and only counsel for the private respondents and the State respondents were present. The court noted the absence of the petitioner and, after hearing …
The petitioner, Smt. Sundri Devi, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that the case was listed for priority hearing but the petitioner failed to engage counsel and no vakalatnama was filed. The petitioner was not present to pursue the petition, while the standing …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shoaib Suleman Shaikh, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 140(3) and 143(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for allegedly luring a four‑year‑old girl. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the victim’s statement …
Surjeet Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summoning order dated 23‑01‑2025 and stay the cyber‑fraud trial (Case No. 25 of 2025) in which he was named as an accused. He contended that he was never mentioned in the FIR and was implicated only because his …
The applicants, Shailendra and four others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants even after a revised call. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS challenging a Lok Adalat order that rejected a police final report (NCR No. 141/2015) and treated the matter as a criminal complaint, leading to a summoning order dated 28.03.2024. The High Court examined whether a Lok Adalat …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Tavish Raza, who is charged under Section 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 for allegedly shooting Arman Sonu during a dispute over a marriage. The applicant contended that he …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rameshchandra, who is accused in a 1999 case under IPC sections 307, 323, 324 and 506. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the FIR did not specifically charge him, asserting he only carried a ballam while the co‑accused fired …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Karan Singh, who is charged under Sections 109, 126(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged assault causing grievous injuries. The applicant claimed false implication and pointed to the bail of co‑accused, while the State …
The petition was filed by Akshaj Singh against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. Counsel for the petitioner, Krishna Dutt Awasthi, and counsel for the respondents, C.S.C. and Rohit Pandey, appeared before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The matter was briefly heard …
The accused, Sartaz, Farukh and Samedin, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 15 of 2026) filed under Sections 109(1), 118(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. They claimed they were falsely implicated and that the injuries alleged in the FIR were simple in …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Junaid, who is charged under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 351(2) and 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly inflicting grievous injuries on Nafees and Amir. The applicant’s counsel argued that he was falsely …
Sarvesh Kumar, along with two co‑accused, was charged under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 118(2) for allegedly assaulting Roop Singh with an axe, brickbats and an iron rod, causing grievous injuries. The FIR was lodged a day after the incident, and the applicant argued that the delay and the …
Mahesh Singh Verma, holder of arms licence No. 5567, challenged the cancellation of his licence by the District Magistrate, Etawah, which was based on the registration of three FIRs involving serious criminal allegations. The petitioner argued that mere registration of FIRs, without a finding of …
The petitioner, Vinod Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Jaunpur, to decide Revision/Case No. 0980 of 2023 (Hemant Kumar v. Murari) which had been pending since 20‑02‑2023. The petitioner alleged undue delay and attached the order sheet as …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Gooliyaan, filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash an order dated 20 March 2023 passed by the Additional Commissioner under Section 28(2)(ii) of the Uttar Pradesh VAT Act, alleging tax liability. The court noted that for assessment year 2015-16, an earlier ex …
The petitioners, recorded tenure holders of Gata No. 2276 (0.7139 ha) in Shikarpur, Bulandshahr, challenged an ex‑parte order dated 30‑07‑1994 that reduced their land by 0.100 ha and merged it into Gata No. 2275, which belongs to respondents and is claimed to be abadi land excluded from …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sarvesh Yadav, who is charged under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that he has several pending cases in which he is already on bail and fears …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and others not to harass or interfere with their peaceful marital life. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel indicated that they no longer wished to pursue the present petition and sought liberty to file a fresh …
The petitioners, Mohd Asif and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the State for renewal of their market licence for Gata No.79 & 100, Ward No.12, Kasba/Nagar Panchayat, Shergarh, Bareilly. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and …
Ramvir Singh Yadav filed a public interest litigation seeking mandamus orders to release Gaon Sabha land encroached upon, recover fines, investigate alleged nexus among officials, and act on a representation. The petitioner relied on eviction orders passed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, …
The petitioners filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition and to be allowed to file a criminal revision thereafter. The Court granted the request, dismissing the petition as withdrawn and expressly granting liberty to …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shoaib @ Chaoba, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kadeem Ahmad, who is charged under several sections of the B.N.S. for allegedly firing at a deceased relative during a family dispute. The applicant contended that the actual shooter was co‑accused Nadeem, that no weapon was recovered from him, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Jitendra in a case involving offences under Section 143(3) of the same Act and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …
The petitioner, a wife, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Amroha, to expedite a pending maintenance proceeding under Section 125(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code (case No. 164 of 2024, Rakhi v. Amit …
The petitioner, Ms. Uttara Bahuguna, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and the Noida Authority to allot a 5% compensation of Abadi land under the NOIDA scheme. The Court examined the petition and noted that the issue falls within the jurisdiction of the Noida …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Appeal No. 1934/2022) arising from a case registered under Sections 498A, 323, 506 of the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties claimed that they had reached …
Petitioner Smt. Naresh Devi filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent (the appellate court) to decide a pending second appeal (No.2363 of 2023) concerning a suit for division of holding. The second appeal arose after the lower court rejected an application challenging the suit’s …
The petitioner, Avanish Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Fatehpur, to decide the pending Misc. Case No. 273 of 2025 (Avanish Kumar v. Amita Devi) expeditiously. The petitioner argued that the lower court had …
The petitioner, Monika Gupta, filed a habeas corpus writ petition (No. 458 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition. The petitioner therefore requested …
The mother of an 18‑month‑old child filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that the father had forcibly taken the child away. The Single Judge dismissed the petition, holding that the child was in the father's custody and directing the mother to seek relief under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and …
The petitioner, Ved Prakash Sharma, retired on 31 January 2025 and filed a writ petition seeking payment of his retiral dues from the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The court, without delving into the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Banti Kumar in Criminal Case No. 545 of 2025, where he was alleged to have participated in an assault that caused the death of the informant's son. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing to a one‑day delay in …
The petitioner, Ramesh Singh, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel authorities to remove illegal encroachments by respondents 5‑7 on land earmarked for an Anganwadi Center in Kaushambi district. The petition alleged that the encroachments would adversely affect …
The petitioner, Rahul Yadav @ Jitendra Yadav, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8808 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition sought relief, but during the hearing the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that …
The petitioners, Buddhi and others, sought an order under Article 227 for the expeditious disposal of a civil suit (Misc. Case No. 235 of 2017) pending before the Civil Judge (S.D.) in Bulandshahar. The suit had been pending for nine years and was at the stage of cross‑examination of plaintiff …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, seeking a court direction to compel the revenue court (respondent No.2) to expedite Revision No. 582 of 2026. The petition was filed on 16 April 2026, before the notice dated 21 April 2026 had even been served on …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) of Baheri to hear a pending restoration application filed on 03‑11‑2025 under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the application …
Petitioner Nand Lal filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to respondent No.2 to decide a stay application filed with Revision No.5361 of 2025, which had been pending due to routine adjournments. The petitioner argued that the delay was unwarranted and sought an expeditious resolution. The …
Petitioner Shyam Vijay filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 15304 of 2026) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be dismissed on the ground that it was not pressed at this stage. The Court accepted the prayer and held that the petition …
Petitioner Laxmi Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the revenue officer (respondent No.2) to decide a pending mutation case (Case No. 685 of 2020) under Section 34 of the Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 2020 despite multiple dates being fixed. The petitioner …
Petitioner Rajeev Kumar Kamal, a plaintiff-landlord, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Small Causes Court, Aligarh, to dispose of SCC Case No. 37 of 2017 (Rajeev Kumar Komal vs. Shree Gopal Sharma) within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that the case was stuck …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 7388 of 2025, which involved non‑compoundable offences under Sections 115(2), 131, 333 and 351(2) of the IPC. Earlier, the High Court had directed the parties to obtain a …
Shivam Namdev applied for bail in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 103(1), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 115(2) and 352 of the IPC. The applicant was not named in the FIR but was later implicated by an eye‑witness; no weapon was recovered from him and no specific role in the alleged …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 10‑11‑2025 in Writ Petition No.11756 of 2025. The order was served to the opposite party on 10‑12‑2025, but compliance had not been …
The applicant, Anupam Sharma, filed a contempt application alleging that the respondent, District Panchayat Raj Officer Ram Shankar Verma, had failed to comply with a transfer order dated 22.05.2025. The writ court, in its order dated 13.08.2025 in Writ‑A No.11613 of 2025, directed the standing …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party wilfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 01‑05‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 5765 of 2025. The order had been personally served on 19‑05‑2025, but the opposite party had not …
The applicants, Smt. Raziya Parveen Siddiqui and others, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, P.N. Singh, willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 29 May 2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 66040 of 2013. The order was served to …
The applicant, Ramchander, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act seeking punishment of the opposite party for willful disobedience of a judgment dated 17‑03‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 7586 of 2025. The order had been personally served on the opposite party on …
The appellant, Smt. Rani, filed a claim petition (No. 182 of 2011) which was decided on 08‑08‑2012 and she received the full award. Subsequently, she filed a First Appeal from Order Defective after a delay of 4,909 days, claiming she was unaware of the filing requirements because she had been …
The applicant, Smt. Zikra Khatoon, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act against the Registrar/Inspector of Madarsa Siksha Parishad for allegedly refusing to obey a judgment dated 04‑11‑2025 in Writ Petition No.16246 of 2025. The order was served on the opposite …
Nahar Singh filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that Rajendra Kumar, Deputy Custodian for Enemy Property of India, willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 19‑01‑2026 in Writ Petition No.239 of 2026. The order had been served to the opposite …
Smt. Dharmwati filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to decide her representation dated 5 February 2026 by a reasoned order within a stipulated time. The petitioner limited the prayer to a direction for timely decision, not the merits of the …
The petitioner, Satyendra Chauhan, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing certain respondents to remove alleged illegal encroachments on several parcels of public land in Ghazipur district. The respondents contested the petition, and the Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection …
The petitioner, Lalta Prasad, sought an expeditious disposal of his application for a temporary injunction filed in 2023 against the respondents. The High Court observed that the trial court had been fixing dates with long gaps of two to three months, often due to the presiding officer’s leave or …
The applicant, Mohd Jameer, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case pending before the Judicial Magistrate‑10, Kanpur. He asserted that the dispute with the State had been settled by a compromise dated …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 29‑08‑2025 in Writ Petition No.11704 of 2025. The order was served on 17‑10‑2025, but the opposite party had not complied. The court found …
Petitioner Bachu Singh filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar of Mathura to decide a pending restoration application (Case No. 5460 of 2025) filed under section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the application had been …
The applicant, Rahul Saxena, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a criminal case (Crime No. 328 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 191(2), 109(1), 308(5), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. While the application was pending, the applicant’s counsel …
Petitioner Suggi Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to decide her application dated 09-04-2026 for renewal of a fair price shop in Gram Sabha, Behra, Varanasi. The petitioner alleged that the application remained pending without any final decision. The High Court …
Petitioner Smt. Priti Shukla filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Nayab Tehsildar of Prayagraj to decide a pending revenue case (Case No.3120 of 2026) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code. The petitioner argued that despite several dates being fixed, the case remained …
The petitioners, Rinki Kumari and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing respondents No.2 and No.3 not to interfere with the petitioners' peaceful life as alleged to be caused by respondents No.4 to No.7. The petition alleged that the respondents …
The petitioner, Dhruvram, filed a writ petition seeking reimbursement of medical bills, alleging that his representations to the authorities had not been acted upon despite a considerable lapse of time. The petition was heard ex parte, as no response was obtained from the respondents, the State of …
The petitioner Shiv Pratap Singh challenged a punishment order dated 15 July 2025 issued by the Superintendent of Police. He filed a statutory appeal on 1 January 2026, contending that the appeal was delayed due to bona‑fide reasons and that a small delay should be condoned. The Deputy Inspector …
The petitioner, Jagjeet Kaur, filed a petition under Article 227 challenging a High Court order dated 10 February 2026 that rejected his application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. The petitioner sought to have the order set aside, which would effectively lead to the rejection of the plaint. The …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and others not to harass or interfere with their peaceful marital life. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel indicated that they no longer wished to pursue the present petition and requested liberty to file a fresh …
The petitioner, Hari Narayan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 10.03.2026 passed by the Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Azamgarh Division, Azamgarh, in Appeal No.805 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. C202515000000805) titled Lalji v. …
The petitioner, Durgawati Tiwari, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, seeking liberty to approach the authorities later. The respondents did not oppose this request. The court …
The applicant Zainul Abdeen filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashal of Criminal Case No. 16813 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 69, 88, 351(3) and 352 of the BNSS. A fresh compromise between the applicant and the victim was verified by the trial court on …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the respondent to release contractual dues of Rs.5,05,240 with interest and to decide the petitioner’s application dated 19‑03‑2025. The standing counsel raised no objection to the petitioner's application being …
The petitioners, Shweta Nishad and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondents No.2 and No.3 not to interfere with their peaceful life in relation to respondent No.4. The petition alleged that such interference was occurring and requested the court's intervention. The …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Devesh Kumar, who was implicated in a narcotics case (Crime No. 185 of 2025) under Sections 8, 15(C), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely …
Petitioner Mahendra Nath Shukla filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Principal Secretary, Ministry of Public Works, U.P., to pay his third Assured Career Progression benefits accrued on 17-12-2019, along with interest. He alleged that despite several …
Ankur Mishra filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 18‑05‑2024 in a case where he was charged under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that, according to the Supreme Court’s …
The applicant, Sonam Seth, filed a civil transfer application (No. 856 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to prosecute the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the transfer application for want of …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Vishan Yadav, who was charged under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 103(1), 352 and 61(2) B.N.S. for an alleged offence in Jaunpur. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that CCTV footage and eyewitness testimony did not …
The petitioner Shanti Devi filed a public‑interest writ petition under Article 226 seeking the High Court to direct the District Deputy Director of Consolidation to expedite correction of a land‑record entry (Plot No. 86) that had been re‑classified from ‘Banjar’ to ‘Abadi’ without any change in …
The applicants, Noubhat Singh and another, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the District Magistrate, Arvind Mallappa Bangari, willfully disobeyed the High Court’s order dated 19‑12‑2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 39347 of 2025. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑03‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 21‑01‑2026 in State v. Taslim Bi and another, which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420 and 506 IPC. The applicants contended, relying on the Supreme …
The petitioner, a former LIC agent, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the respondent to pay his agent gratuity for service from 27‑01‑1987 to 23‑03‑2006. The respondent contended that the petitioner’s claim had already been rejected by an order …
The petitioners sought a mandamus directing the Director of Pension and Treasury, Uttar Pradesh, to decide their applications for refund of excess pension deductions filed on 7 February 2025 and 20 February 2025 within a stipulated period. The State argued that a government order issued after the …
The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash an order dated 26‑09‑2025 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tehsil Kerakat, under Section 209(J) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2005, and also requested an interim mandamus to prevent any interference with his peaceful possession of land. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Aasif, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Tejman in a case involving alleged gold‑loan fraud, with charges under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated by a …
Saif Ali was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 374 of 2025) under Sections 352 and 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code. His first bail application was rejected, but during trial the principal witnesses turned hostile, leaving no material evidence against him. The applicant, who has been in …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (Respondent No.2) to decide a declaratory suit (T201917650102907 of 2019) that had been pending since 2019 despite multiple dates being fixed. The petitioners …
The petitioners, Smt Neelam and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others not to harass or interfere with their peaceful marital life. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the present petition and seek liberty to …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 23‑08‑2021 and a cognizance order dated 27‑10‑2021 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the …
Ajay Singh, a BSF constable, filed a criminal revision challenging an execution order dated 16.03.2026 passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Deoria, which was issued under Section 128 of the Cr.P.C. to enforce an ex parte maintenance order of Rs. 14,000 granted to Shashi …
The petitioner, Smt. Santosh Kumari Upadhyay, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Ghazipur, to decide her pending application (No. 13922/2025) for consolidation of two mutation cases involving the same parties and property. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioner, Nikita Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the Additional District Judge (POCSO III) in Gautambudh Nagar decide the pending Session Trial No.1582 of 2022 (State vs. Sumit Jha) without unnecessary adjournments. The case involves offences under IPC …
Smt. Seema Verma filed a writ petition challenging a decision of the State of U.P. and others, alleging that her grievances should be addressed without delay. The respondents argued that the petition was not maintainable because the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Rule 5 of the U.P. Basic …
The applicant, Deepak Shakyawar, was charged under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence involving a minor girl. The FIR was lodged 27 days after the alleged incident, and the victim’s statement indicated consent, noting that she had …
The petitioner, Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to the competent authority to execute its Section 14 order dated 27 December 2021 for possession of secured assets. The petitioner relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in C. Bright v. District …
The petitioner, Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to the competent authority to execute its Section 14 order dated 27 December 2021 for possession of secured assets. The petitioner relied on the Supreme Court judgment in C. Bright v. District …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Lavkush in a case involving alleged participation in a mob that assaulted a Nagar Palika team during an encroachment removal operation. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and had no prior criminal …
Sunil Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 69, 89 and 351(3) of the BNS, alleged to involve an honor‑killing scenario where the victim died after her parents intervened in a consensual relationship. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, had no prior …
The petitioners, Km. Anjali and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others not to interfere with their peaceful marital life. After hearing, the petitioners' counsel indicated they no longer wished to pursue the present petition and sought liberty to …
Petitioners Smt. Anjali and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide protection against alleged threats. The petition also requested …
Petitioner Vishwajeet Maurya challenged an FIR dated 27.03.2026 under IPC sections 351(3), 352 and 115(2). The State argued that the investigation was complete and a charge‑sheet had been filed on 07.04.2026, so the proper remedy was an application under CrPC Section 528/482, not a writ. The …
Alham Siddiqui filed a PIL seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of U.P. officials (respondents 2‑4) to take legal action against a third party (respondent 6) for removing an illegal encroachment on a 0.51‑hectare land parcel in Kaptanganj, Uttar Pradesh. The Court noted that the petitioner …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of two police personnel accused under Sections 8, 20(b), 27A and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act for alleged possession of 21.1 kg of ganja. The …
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to restrain respondents from constructing a temple over an Anganwadi Kendra in Shikohpur, Baghpat. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, citing …
Petitioner Aishwarya Singh filed a writ petition seeking a compassionate appointment after her husband died in harness on 24-11-2025. The respondents, including a bank, asked her to submit certain documents by email on 24-12-2025, which she had not yet filed. The petitioner acknowledged the request …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 27‑01‑2026 in Writ Petition No.2458 of 2026. The order had been served on 17‑02‑2026, but the opposite party had not complied. …
Mehboob Alam filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 23‑02‑2026 of the Additional District & Session Judge (Special Judge, POCSO Act) which formally framed charges against him under Section 74, Section 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The revisionist argued that …
The applicants, Sanjeev Gupta and two others, filed a contempt application challenging an interim order, even though the original writ petition had already been dismissed. The respondent, Lokesh M., CEO of Noida, was the opposite party. The applicant's counsel, Neeraj Srivastava, argued that the …
The petitioner, a former employee of U.P. Jal Nigam (Rural), retired on 31 July 2021 and filed a writ petition alleging that he had not been informed of the total dues payable to him, nor the manner of their payment. He also raised concerns about a pending group insurance claim. The respondents, …
The petitioner, a retired employee of U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban), filed a writ petition seeking payment of pending dues to fund his daughter's marriage scheduled for 5 May 2026. The department acknowledged financial constraints but promised to clear at least one-quarter of the dues before the marriage …
The applicants filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 20‑03‑2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 6753 of 2025. The court observed that a prima facie case of contempt existed but …
The applicant filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash the summons dated 15.01.2024 and the criminal proceedings in Complaint No.1064 of 2023 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, alleging that the cheque was issued to settle a debt and that the complaint was filed …
An application under Section 528 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was filed by Amar Singh and another against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another. The petitioners were represented by counsel Ajay Dubey and the respondents by G.A. The matter was listed before Hon’ble Justice Saurabh Srivastava. …
The High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. filed by Shyam Bihari seeking to quash a summoning order dated 13‑December‑2021 issued in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant also requested that the lower courts decide his bail …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 53 of 2022, which involved offences under Sections 363 and 366-A of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act, as well as a pending order of …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 11‑11‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 16739 of 2025. The order had been served to the opposite party on 04‑12‑2025, but compliance …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 01‑08‑2025 and the related criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. During the hearing, the applicant withdrew his challenge to the warrant and instead …
The applicant, Ram Bilas Doharey, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act seeking to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of a judgment dated 11‑12‑2025 in Writ Petition No.18663 of 2025. The court noted that a certified copy of the order had been …
The High Court examined a contempt application filed by Ganga against Rajesh Pratap Singh and two others. The applicant sought possession of a disputed property and alleged contempt of the court. The Court noted that an interim order dated 24 September 2025 in Writ‑C No.33557 of 2025 did not grant …
The applicant, Smt. Reena Chatterjee, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act against the Vice Chairman of the Prayagraj Development Authority for allegedly willfully disobeying a judgment dated 05‑12‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 18122 of 2025. The original order was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings and charge sheets arising from a case under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, claiming that the parties had settled their dispute by compromise. The State …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash a criminal complaint (case no. 1126 of 2026) filed by the mother‑in‑law under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The complaint named the daughter‑in‑law and also her father and brothers, who …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 25 July 2025 in Writ Petition No.11182 of 2024. The order was served to the opposite party on 7 August 2025, but compliance had not been …
The applicants filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 15‑11‑2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 17101 of 2025. The order had been served on 17‑11‑2025, but the opposite party had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 4952 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, an Executive Engineer, willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 26‑05‑2025 in Writ Petition No.7398 of 2025. The order was served on 26‑06‑2025 but remained unimplemented. The …
The petitioner, Satyendra Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Regional Passport Office, Lucknow, to re‑issue his passport without delay. His application was pending because a criminal case (Cr. No. 307 of 2016) involving offences under Sections 323, 504, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (BNSS) Act seeking to quash the criminal complaint (Case No. 2 of 2025) and a summoning order, and also asked the court to direct an expeditious decision on their bail applications. During the hearing the …
The applicant, Narendra Bafana, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance‑cum‑summoning order dated 23‑05‑2025 in a cheque‑bounce case (Complaint No. 19 of 2025 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act). The High Court examined the contention that the …
The petitioner, Murari Yadav, was granted a compassionate appointment to a Class‑IV post after his father's death but sought a transfer to a teaching post on compassionate grounds. He filed a writ petition invoking government orders dated 04‑09‑2000 and 15‑02‑2013, contending that a prior judgment …
The petitioner, Ravish Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a compassionate appointment to a teaching post after having been appointed to a Class‑IV post following his father's death. He argued that, based on earlier government orders (04‑09‑2000 and 15‑02‑2013) and a precedent (Special Appeal No. …
The applicant, Ajeet Singh Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bail and No‑Objection (BNSS) Act seeking to quash the pending criminal complaint (Case No. 920 of 2024) filed against him under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Domestic Violence Act. The applicant did not press …
The petitioner, Km Sushma, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner requested that the petition be dismissed to allow filing a fresh petition with improved averments and documents. The Court accepted this prayer, dismissing the present writ …
Yogesh Suri filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a summons issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, in a cheque‑bounce case (Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act) filed by the State of U.P. The applicant argued that the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Nadeem Kuraishi, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant asserted that he was falsely …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Nasir in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant claimed innocence, no criminal record, and that no material was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Aslam, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the FIR was lodged …
Petitioners Kamal Pandey and another filed a writ petition seeking to set aside an order dated 09‑04‑2026 passed by the appellate court in appeal No. D201916660000091 (now RST/1780/2025) and to compel the court to decide pending stay applications concerning possession of two land parcels in …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Madhukar Srivastava under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B relating to a land fraud. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged against …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Devendra Mishra (alias Dabbu) under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, in FIR dated 13-11-2021. The applicant argued that the gang chart linking him to the case had been quashed …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 17‑02‑2026 in Writ Petition No.6352 of 2026. The order was served on the opposite party on 19‑02‑2026, but compliance had not …
Jasveer Kumar filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his arrest and subsequent remand under sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sahnita, the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and the Aadhaar Act, 2016. The petitioner contended that the arrest memo lacked a proper ground and was based on an …
The applicant, Smt. Amita Agarwal, filed a transfer application seeking to move Criminal Case No.30159 of 2023 (under Section 406 IPC) from Agra to Bareilly on the ground of inconvenience. The court noted that the Uttar Pradesh Rules for Video Conferencing (2020) provide a digital alternative that …
The applicant, Smt Amita Agarwal, a complainant in a criminal case under Section 406 IPC, filed a transfer application seeking to move the case from Agra to Bareilly on the ground of inconvenience. The respondent State opposed the transfer. The Court noted that the Rules for Video Conferencing for …
The applicant, Smt Amita Agarwal, filed a transfer application seeking to move Criminal Case No.30158 of 2023 (under Section 406 IPC) from the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑II, Agra to a parallel court in Bareilly, citing inconvenience. The respondent State opposed the transfer. The Court …
The applicant, Rajeshwari Prasad Pandey, filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the summons order dated 20‑03‑2021 in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case (Complaint No. 1056 of 2019) and to stay the non‑bailable warrant issued against him. The court noted the applicant's …
The applicants filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 15 September 2023 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 33776 of 2008. The court examined whether the alleged non‑compliance …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 09-10-2025 in Writ Petition No. 28198 of 2025. The order was served to the opposite party on 08-11-2025, but compliance was not …
The applicant, Ashok Kumar Pandey, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party wilfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 04‑07‑2025 in Writ Petition No.7203 of 2019. The order had been served on the opposite party on 15‑07‑2025, …
The applicant, Dr. Madhulika Mishra, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite parties wilfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 31 July 2025 in Writ Petition No.24097 of 2018. The order was served on 25 August 2025 but remained …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under CrPC Section 482 on behalf of Juvenile X, a minor accused in a case involving assault and the death of a patient due to septicemia. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal antecedents, and that the …
The petitioner, a Scientific Officer/D at the Narora Atomic Power Station, suffers from chronic liver disease and sought a transfer from Bulandshahr to the QA Office in Noida to facilitate easier access to medical treatment. The employer rejected the request, stating that the Noida post is …
The petitioner, Om Prakash, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to the second respondent, a revenue authority, to decide Revision No.141 of 2025 filed under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that he was the sole contesting party and that the lower court …
The High Court, while disposing of Writ-A No. 14804 of 2023 on 14 September 2023, directed the opposite party to decide the representation of the applicant, Narendra Kumar Saxena. The opposite party filed a compliance affidavit on 15 July 2024, stating that the representation decision was made on 30 …
The applicant, Urvi Singh, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 353 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. The application was listed but no steps were taken to prosecute it. The court observed that there was no appearance or action by the applicant to press the …
Manmohan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 180 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 64, 127(2), 351(2) of the IPC and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. The bail application was filed on 16 May 2025 but the applicant’s counsel failed to appear for subsequent hearings, including the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ramnaresh, who is charged under Sections 363, 376AB, 307 of the IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged offences against a six‑year‑old child. The applicant claimed innocence, citing lack of any witness examination, absence of …
Mukesh alias Bauwa, accused under IPC sections 376Ka and 376Kha and POCSO Act sections 5 and 6 for a rape offence, has been in judicial custody since March 2020. He filed a second bail application, claiming innocence, lack of medical corroboration of the alleged rape, and that his prolonged …
The petitioners, who had participated in a 2016 recruitment process for Technical Grade‑II apprentices at U.P. Power Corporation, were initially selected but later omitted from the revised list of 12‑12‑2017. They sought to benefit from a Supreme Court order dated 12 Oct 2022, issued under Article …
Mahendra applied for bail in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 352, 65(2) of the IPC and Sections 5M/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant failed to appear before the court on multiple dates after filing the bail application on 16 May 2025. The court observed that such non‑appearance …
Suresh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 17334 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court, seeking release pending trial. The applicant's counsel, Raj Kumar Khanna and Sandal Khanna, informed the court that the trial had already been concluded, rendering the bail application …
The High Court had earlier ordered that the opposite party not dispossess the applicant from a disputed land except as per law. The opposite party later filed a compliance affidavit stating that the order was not violated and the land remained in the applicant's possession. The applicant then filed …
The applicant, Pradeep Kumar Pandey, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the trial court handling his Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint (Case No. 27154 of 2023) to expedite the proceedings. The applicant argued …
The High Court, while disposing of Writ-A No. 13515 of 2023 on 17 August 2023, directed the opposite party to decide upon the applicant's claim. The opposite party filed a compliance affidavit on 2 July 2024 stating that the decision was made on 26 June 2024, attaching the decision as annexure. The …
The petitioner alleged that he transferred Rs. 61,75,000 to the respondent's rice mill based on false representations and sought criminal investigation under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Civil Judge dismissed the application, deeming the dispute civil, and the Sessions Judge …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Nazim Ansari, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No.57 of 2024) involving alleged receipt of Rs.20,00,000 and charges under IPC Section 420 and IT Act Section …
Mohd. Wahid Khan filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 30.11.2023 in a complaint case involving alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant …
The applicant, Habsons Builders and Infrastructure Ltd, filed a contempt application alleging non‑compliance with a writ order. The opposite party, Collector/DM Manish Kumar Verma, filed a compliance affidavit stating that Rs. 8,482,884 was recovered from a defaulter and remitted to the Real Estate …
Habsons Builders and Infrastructure Ltd filed a contempt application against Shri Manish Kumar Verma, alleging non‑compliance with a writ order. The opposite party submitted a compliance affidavit stating that Rs. 7,063,242 had been recovered from a defaulter firm and remitted to the Real Estate …
The applicant, Habsons Builders and Infrastructure Ltd, filed a contempt application alleging non‑compliance with a writ court order. The opposite party, Collector/DM Manish Kumar Verma, filed a compliance affidavit stating that Rs. 7,056,870 had been recovered from a defaulter and remitted to the …
In a bail cancellation application (No. 821 of 2023), the petitioner Dilip Kumar Yadav sought to have his bail cancelled. The application was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, but no representative appeared on behalf of the applicant or the informant. The State's Additional …
The applicant, Habsons Builders and Infrastructure Ltd, filed a contempt application alleging non‑compliance with a writ order. The opposite party, the Collector/District Magistrate, filed a compliance affidavit stating that Rs. 8,851,396 had been recovered from a defaulter firm and remitted to the …
The Allahabad High Court considered the bail application of Bheem, who is charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences against a girl whose age was determined to be 17 years by an ossification test. The victim’s statement …
Smt. Varsha Goyal filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 382 of 2025 against Abhishek Kumar Goyal in the Allahabad High Court. The application sought to transfer the suit to another court. No appearance was made by the applicant to press the application. The court observed that there was no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Eklak, who is charged under sections 64(2)(m), 308(2), 351(3) of the BNS Act and sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences in Gorakhpur. The victim, born on 03‑07‑2007, was found pregnant and had undergone an abortion at the …
Firoz applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 203 of 2025) involving charges under the IPC, POCSO Act and SC/ST Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated. He argued that the FIR was filed five hours after the alleged incident, there was no medical evidence, and the victim’s statements were …
The Allahabad High Court considered the bail application of Dhanesh, who was charged in Crime No. 41 of 2025 under sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act and sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under section 183 of the BNS indicated consent, but the victim’s age …
Shehzan Ui Haq applied for bail in a criminal case (No. 97 of 2025) involving offences under the BNS Act, POCSO Act and IT Act. The bail application was filed on 13 June 2025 but neither the applicant’s counsel nor the informant’s counsel appeared on the scheduled date of 15 April 2026. The Court …
The applicant, Rinku alias Jaiprakash, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel informed the court that the applicant had already been acquitted of the charges. The court noted that since the applicant was no longer in custody, the …
The High Court, while disposing of Writ-A No. 11913 of 2023 on 17 October 2023, directed the opposite party to release the applicant's post-retiral dues. The opposite party filed a compliance affidavit on 5 September 2024, stating that the entire dues had been paid, attaching annexures as proof. The …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Jitu Raikwar and Viru Raikwar, accused in Crime No. 145 of 2025 under several IPC sections and sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicants, who have been in custody since 29 March 2025 and have no prior criminal record, argued …
The writ court directed Dr. Ishtiyak Ahmad, C.M.O., to decide the representation of Ram Swaroop, the applicant. The opposite party complied with this direction on 20 February 2023, as evidenced by an annexed compliance affidavit filed on 31 August 2024. The applicant then filed a civil contempt …
In Contempt Application (Civil) No. 4003 of 2024, Om Prakash Yadav filed a contempt petition against Shri Vikash Yadav alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. The applicant's counsel, Bijendra Kumar Mishra, informed the Court that the writ Court order had been fully complied with, rendering …
The applicant, Radhey Shyam, filed a contempt application against the respondent, D.F.O. Vikash Yadav, alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. The applicant’s counsel, Bijendra Kumar Mishra, informed the Court that the writ order had in fact been complied with, rendering the contempt …
