Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 12401–12600
The applicant, Faheem, filed a bail application in Special Session Trial No.1309 of 2024 concerning offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC indicated consent, and the …
Arpit Kumar applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 38 of 2025, which involves offences under Sections 87, 65(1), 137(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, a 19‑year‑old, gave a statement under Section 183 of the CrPC indicating she had travelled with the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak Gurjar, who was charged under IPC sections 363 (kidnapping), 376 (rape), 328 (extortion) and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, the FIR was lodged six days after the alleged incident, …
Lalchand filed a contempt application against Divisional Forest Officer Vikash Yadav alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. The applicant’s counsel, Bijendra Kumar Mishra, informed the Court that the writ order had been fully complied with, rendering the contempt proceeding unnecessary. …
Sudin filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court against Shri Vikash Yadav, the Divisional Forest Officer, alleging non-compliance with a writ court order. The applicant's counsel, Bijendra Kumar Mishra, informed the court that the writ court's order had been fully complied with, …
The applicant, Pardeshi, filed a civil contempt application (No. 4012 of 2024) against Shri Vikash Yadav, the Divisional Forest Officer, alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. The applicant’s counsel, Bijendra Kumar Mishra, informed the Court that the writ Court’s order had been fully …
The applicant, Shiv Poojan Pandey, filed a civil contempt application against the Divisional Forest Officer, Praveen Kumar Khare, alleging non‑compliance with a writ court order. The applicant's counsel, Bijendra Kumar Mishra, informed the court that the writ court order had been complied with, …
Radhe Syam Yadav filed a civil contempt application against DFO Vikash Yadav, alleging non‑compliance with a writ court order. The applicant’s counsel, Bijendra Kumar Mishra, informed the court that the writ order had been fully complied with, rendering the contempt proceeding unnecessary. The court …
The petition filed by Sikander under Article 227 was found to have no further prosecution. The court observed that the petitioner had not taken any steps to advance the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated. No substantive …
Pradeep Chauhan was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 598 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, initially a complainant, turned hostile during trial and later stated that she was a consenting …
The applicant, Rajendra Maurya, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the trial proceedings and orders dated 04.04.2025 and 15.05.2025 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Rampur, on the ground that the alleged offence occurred in Rudrapur, Uttarakhand, and therefore the …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Agrawal, filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel was listed for the respondent. The court observed that the petitioner failed to press the petition and there was no prosecution of the suit. Consequently, the petition was dismissed …
The petitioners, Mother Ayesha Children Academy (through its manager), sought to quash orders dated 19‑10‑2024 and 07‑05‑2025 that allowed the respondent to obtain interim compensation under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act in a complaint (Case No. 4878 of 2023) alleging dishonour of a …
The applicant, Mohd. Ikram, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case (State vs. Mohd. Ikram) involving offences under Sections 376 and 506 IPC. The applicant and the prosecutrix had married on 16 December 2025, and …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Babloo Kumar, who was arrested on 28‑April‑2025 in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 11 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, …
The applicant, Mandeep, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 21‑12‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 24‑04‑2025 in a criminal case alleging offences under Sections 376‑D, 354, 504, 506 and 120‑B IPC. He contended that the FIR was lodged …
Manoj Kumar filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, while the State respondents were represented. The court noted the absence of any prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhola alias Vijay Kumar, who was arrested in a Special Session Case under the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor. The applicant argued innocence, citing a four‑day delay in filing the FIR, absence of medical evidence, and that the FIR only …
Ramchet and four others filed a criminal revision challenging the trial court's order rejecting their discharge application in a complaint under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and 451. The revisionists argued that the complainant’s statements under Sections 200 and 244 of the CrPC contained …
The applicant, Akash Chauhan, filed a bail application in a case involving offences under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the POCSO Act, claiming innocence and a lack of criminal history. He had been in custody for 16 months since December 2024. The trial …
The petitioner, Tufani Pal, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against certain accused. The court was informed that a charge sheet had been filed against Neeraj Yadav and Ajay Yadav, and a final report had been filed in favor of Vikas Yadav and Ramoo Yadav. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for the accused Sohanvir, who was also charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false implication, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Atul Kumar, who was charged under Sections 65(1), 115(2), 352 of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence that began as outraging modesty and was later escalated to rape. The victim’s statement recorded under …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sarwan Kevat, who was arrested on charges of theft (IPC s.363), rape (IPC s.376) and offences under Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the victim, although recorded as 16 …
The writ court on 15 March 2024 directed the opposite party to conclude a pending investigation. The opposite party filed an affidavit on 27 July 2024 stating that the investigation was completed and a report was submitted on 2 May 2024 before the Assistant Commissioner of Police. Subsequently, a …
The applicants, Sudeep Kumar and four others, filed a contempt application against Dr. Lokesh M, IAS, CEO, alleging non‑compliance with a writ court order. The applicant's counsel, Nanda Kumar Shukla, informed the court that the writ court order had been complied with by the opposite party. On this …
Naushad Khan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 533 of 2025) alleging that he had entered into a false promise of marriage with the victim and subsequently refused to marry her, invoking Sections 69, 115(2), 316(2) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution contended that the …
The appellant, Vishwajeet Sharma, filed a withdrawal application (Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No.3 of 2026) seeking to withdraw his appeal against Aditi Pandey. The application was supported by an affidavit. The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, comprising Judges Atul Sreedharan and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dipak Baheliya, who was arrested in connection with the murder of an informant's uncle. The applicant alleged false implication, noting that the post‑mortem report identified a single fatal head injury (injury no. 4) and that he was not …
Surendra Kumar alias Sachin applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 48 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, recorded as about 17 years old, allegedly gave consent and did not raise an alarm during the …
Verma Electricals filed an application under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator in a dispute with the Union of India and two other parties. The court examined the consent of former High Court Judge S.N. Agarwal, which was submitted on …
The applicant, Haridev, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.153 of 2024) involving alleged offences under Sections 363 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The court examined the facts, including a two‑day delay in filing the FIR and the victim's …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul, who is accused under IPC sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n) and POCSO Act sections 5(L) and 6 for offences alleged to have occurred in Gautam Budh Nagar. The victim, a 19‑year‑old woman, testified that she had married Rahul, lived with him for …
Mohd. Junaid, the brother‑in‑law of a married female victim, was arrested on 27 May 2025 in connection with a case (Crime No. 72 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Paramveer @ Lala, who was charged under Sections 70(2) and 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence at Khakhreru police station. The court noted an inordinate one‑day delay in lodging the FIR …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Neeta Devi (alias Rita Devi) in a criminal case (Crime No. 149 of 2025) involving offences under the BNS Act, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The applicant sought bail during the pendency of trial, citing that a co‑accused, Sandeep Tyagi, had …
Veeru Yadav (alias Atul Yadav) applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0109 of 2025) where he is charged under Sections 74, 351(3), 65(2) of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 5m and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged outraging modesty and rape of a minor. The applicant contended that the rape allegation …
The applicant, Akhilesh Vishwakarma, sought bail in Criminal Case No. 38 of 2025, charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement under Section 183 indicated she had voluntarily accompanied the applicant to Bengaluru …
Mohan alias Munna was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 65(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged five months after the alleged incident and the charge‑sheet under Section …
The applicants Maharam and two others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 09‑12‑2017 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 1919 of 2018) arising from offences under Sections 323, 325 and 504 IPC. The parties had entered into a compromise, …
The applicant, Shani Rajbhar, filed a bail application in Criminal Case No. 91 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 65(1), 69, 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 and Sections 5L and 6 of the POCSO Act. The court noted a delay of more than one month in lodging the FIR and that the victim’s …
Satish Kumar Alias Golu applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.119 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 351(2), 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The victim, aged 16-18, had travelled with the applicant to Pune and did not raise any alarm, …
The applicant Ravi was charged under sections 137(2), 87 and 64 of the BNS and sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence in Etawah. The victim, a 17‑year‑old girl, had accompanied the applicant to Rajasthan and did not raise any alarm, leading the trial court to record a statement …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Neeraj in Criminal Case No. 109 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 65(1) and 351(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the victim turned hostile during …
The High Court considered bail applications filed by Gausiya, Rasida Bano and Sahid Ansari (alias Sahjaad) in a case involving alleged offences under sections 87, 61(2), 127(2), 351(3) and 69 of the BNS. The applicants claimed they were falsely implicated, argued that the victim’s statement …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vakeel alias Vikram Nishad in a criminal case involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1), 115(2) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, born on 01‑01‑2008, was said to have accompanied the accused to Mumbai …
The applicant, Krishnakant Alias Chunnu Barar, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 177 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, a 17‑year‑old girl, had reportedly given consent and later married the …
Mukesh Sahani applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 171 of 2024) involving charges under IPC sections 363, 366, 376(3) and POCSO Act sections 5 and 6. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 indicated consent, as she had accompanied the applicant to Bengaluru for three months …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd Gulfam in a criminal case under Section 64(1) of the Bail and Security Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement under Section 183 of the Bail and Security Act suggested consent, and the victim was said to be about 18 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Harsh, who was charged under Sections 65(1) and 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence at T.P. Nagar, Meerut. The victim’s statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS were found to be …
The applicant, Chandbabu, was charged under IPC sections 65(2), 333, 351(3) and POCSO Act sections 5(n)/6 for allegedly outraging the modesty of a two‑and‑a‑half‑year‑old child and committing buccal coitus on 13 March 2025. The applicant argued that the FIR was false, there was no medical evidence, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahibe Alam, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 87, 64(1), 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/5(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021. The applicant claimed he was …
The applicant Vijay was charged in Crime No. 178 of 2025 under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence at Khekra police station, Baghpat. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS Act indicated that she had consented to …
Ankit Sonkar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 177 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1), 123(1) of the BNS and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim, aged about 16 according to an ossification test, alleged that the applicant spiked her drink, …
The applicant, Bardani, filed a bail application in Criminal Case No. 44 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1), 351(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The court examined the facts, the seriousness of the alleged offences, and noted that the victim …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chhotu Chauhan, who is charged under Sections 376, 352, 342, 406, 504 and 506 of the IPC for an alleged incident in Deoria. The victim, a married woman, gave a statement under Section 183 of the BNSS indicating that she had consented and did not …
The applicant Rinku was charged under sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the BNS Act, sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act, and section 3(2)5 of the SC/ST Act for an alleged offence in Mirzapur. The victim’s statement recorded under section 183 of the BNS Act suggested consent, as she travelled with the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravi Kumar, who was charged under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged sexual offence involving a 16‑year‑old girl. The applicant contended that the relationship was consensual, the girl …
The applicant, Kallu, alleged that his daughter was assaulted by Nilesh Gupta while traveling and that the police refused to register an FIR. He filed an application under Section 173(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking registration of the case as a complaint under Section 223. The Special …
The applicant, Narendra Kumar, filed a bail cancellation application in the High Court of Allahabad seeking to set aside bail granted by the Sessions Judge, Pilibhit, to the accused Nilesh in a case under Sections 307, 34 and 504 of the IPC. The application was filed under Criminal Misc. Bail …
The applicant, Rashid Ali, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 204 of 2024) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS and Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The victim, aged between 15 and 16 years, had reportedly given consent and had accompanied the applicant to …
The petitioner, M/s Arora RCC Works, challenged an order dated 03.05.2025 that required it to repair a leakage in an overhead water tank and withheld regulation fees and security deposits. The High Court noted that a fact‑finding enquiry ordered earlier had been completed, and an expert from Aligarh …
Arun was charged under sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act and sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence in Meerut. The victim, aged about 18 as per an ossification test, gave a statement under section 183 BNSS indicating consent, having stayed with the accused for 20 days …
The High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by Anand Kumar Verma, who was in custody for alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The applicant’s counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, …
Lokendra applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 391 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, aged about 17, recorded a statement under Section 183 of the BNSS indicating consent to the proposed …
Munjal Sharma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief after a conviction order. The applicant argued that the appeal against the conviction had already been decided by the appellate court, rendering the application unnecessary. The respondent State of …
The applicant, Anil Barar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No.655 of 2016, which alleged offences of kidnapping, wrongful confinement and rape under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He asserted that he married the victim in …
The petitioner, a contractual employee since 2012, was served a show‑cause notice and subsequently a termination order dated 29‑05‑2025 by the Director, Women Welfare, U.P., without her reply being considered. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quashal of the termination order, alleging …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sabir @ Kalia, who was arrested in a NDPS case (Section 8/20) for allegedly possessing 1.260 kg of charas. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated and …
The applicants sought quash of a charge-sheet and cognizance order in a case under Section 506 IPC for a threatening letter allegedly dropped at the complainant's shop. The FIR named no specific accused and the investigation produced no witness testimony placing the applicants at the scene, nor did …
The petitioner Asif Naseem filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …
The High Court examined a criminal revision filed by Devendra Yadav challenging the Additional Session Judge’s order rejecting his discharge application in a case under Sections 307, 504 and 506 IPC. Yadav argued that the FIR was false, the injuries were caused by a blunt object and did not …
Rohit Singh was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.55 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 64, 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant contended that he is innocent, that the alleged …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Alok Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a case involving IPC offences (452, 354-B, 427, 506, 120-B) and sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application (No. 29266 of 2025) filed by Vipin, who was charged under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64 and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act in Crime No. 197 of 2025. The applicant argued that the allegations were false, the victim had consented as per her …
The revisionists challenged the trial court's order permitting the defendants to amend their written statement to include a counter‑claim under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC read with Section 151. They argued that the original statement filed in 2022 did not contain such reliefs and that an amendment …
Amit Rajpoot was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 137(2), 87 and 64 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012, alleged to involve a minor victim. The applicant contended that the alleged victim was a consenting adult who later married him, and that there was no …
The applicant, Ramjeet Yadav, filed a contempt application against Tehsildar Shailesh Kumar alleging that the Tehsildar had violated an order dated 13‑10‑2022 under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The order was appealed under Section 67(5) but the appeal was dismissed, leading the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pranshu Urf Priyanshu, who is charged under Sections 363, 366, 376(3) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged offences committed in Gajraula, Amroha. The victim, a 17‑year‑old girl, had recorded a statement under Section 183 …
The petitioners sought a writ to challenge the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0129 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under IPC sections 352 and 351(3) BNS and CrPC section 115(2). No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government …
Budhai Maurya and two others filed a criminal revision challenging the Additional Session Judge’s order dated 31.05.2025 that rejected their application to contest the charge sheet. The revisionists alleged that the FIR and subsequent charge sheets were based on false allegations, that independent …
The applicant, Rahul, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief from the High Court. The application was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Deepak Verma, but the applicant's counsel was not present, while the State's counsel appeared. The Court noted the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Akash, accused in a case involving the death of his wife, alleged to be a suicide by hanging. The applicant argued that the death was a suicide and that he had no prior serious criminal record, while the prosecution highlighted the abnormal …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that once a charge sheet is filed, …
Ravi Pratap Shukla applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.153 of 2025) involving alleged assault and intoxication of a consenting adult woman at a hotel, with charges under Sections 64, 123 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, citing a nine‑day delay in filing …
The applicant, Ajay Tiwari, was charged in Sessions Trial No.358 of 2025 for offences under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) BNS and sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act, arising from an alleged sexual act with a 16‑year‑old girl. The victim’s statement recorded under section 183 BNSS indicated that …
The petitioners filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking relief against the respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. Consequently, the Court found that the petition was not being prosecuted. The petition was dismissed for want of …
The applicant, Nazir Ahmad, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 8729 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. During hearing, the applicant’s counsel withdrew the merit-based prayer and …
The applicant, Mohd Aajam, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. The applicant's counsel, Rajesh Kumar Kanojia, failed to appear even after a revised call. Counsel for the respondents, including the U.P. …
The State of Uttar Pradesh challenged the appointment of Ram Kewal and eight others as Assistant Teachers, alleging that the post created in 1986 was not genuine and that the 1996 advertisement and selection were unlawful. Multiple writ petitions were filed over three decades, with earlier courts …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajeet Sharma, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 70(2) and 351(3) of the IPC and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, Riyaz Ansari, in an identical case had been granted bail, and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aman Dhaikar, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the alleged victim was a consenting adult who had …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The court examined an office report dated 22‑04‑2026 which confirmed that the charge‑sheet in the matter had already been filed by the Director General of Police, U.P. …
The petitioner Bhimsen filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that the charge sheet had already …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shivam Rajbhar in a criminal case (Crime No. 227 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 65(1), 352 of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the alleged victim, a …
Mannu @ Monu Harijan applied for bail in a case registered as Crime No.680 of 2024, involving charges under Sections 363, 506, 376(3) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was delayed by four months, and asserted that the alleged …
Vimlesh Kumar, arrested in Crime No.216 of 2024 under IPC sections 70(2), 76, 351(3), 352 and POCSO Act sections 5G/6, applied for bail while the trial is pending. He has been in custody since 1 December 2024 and has no prior criminal record. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, Suraj @ Ravi …
Nadeem filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant, Manoj Kumar Tripathi, informed the court that the applicant no longer wishes to pursue the bail and seeks to withdraw the application. The counsel reiterated this position during the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vijay Kumar Alias Bullet in a criminal case (Crime No. 276 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 65(1), 87, 137(2) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was …
The applicant, Neeraj Sharma, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 253 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 65(1), 87, 351(3), 352 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated and argued that the alleged victim, a major …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 329 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the IPC. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ashish Tiwari, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 61(2), 87, 64(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the alleged victim, a …
Saurabh Gupta was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged outraging of modesty that was later escalated to rape under Sections 75(1)(i), 333, 351(3), 65(2) of the IPC and Sections 5m/6, 9m/10 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that the FIR was filed three days after the incident, …
Salman Khan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 63 of 2025) involving charges under the IPC, POCSO Act, and the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, noting that the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the …
The petitioner Arshad Ahmed challenged orders of the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) in Bijnor that took cognizance of offences under various IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that the magistrate failed to consider the primary police report together with the supplementary report …
Tarun applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 285 of 2025) involving alleged offences under the Indian Penal Code, the POCSO Act and the IT Act. The victim, PW‑1, testified during trial that she was not sexually assaulted, that no indecent photographs were posted, and that she was not …
Rakesh Shakya was arrested in connection with Crime No. 49 of 2025 under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. He filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, asserting false implication and noting that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sawan Chauhan, who was arrested in connection with a case registered as Crime No.60 of 2025 under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay alias Chhotu, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 291 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 61(2), 87 of the IPC, Section 65(1) of the B.N.S.S., and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed …
The applicant, Golu alias Gaurav Tamoli, filed a bail application in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 61(2), 64, 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. He claimed absolute innocence, asserting that the victim’s statement under Section 183 …
The petitioner Asif Naseem filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that the charge sheet …
The petitioner Asif Naseem filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Sanjeev Pathak, who is accused under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false implication, long pre‑trial …
The petitioner, Arun Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet (Crime No. 218 of 2025) under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 351(2) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an …
The petitioners, Arsheen Parvez and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and seeking relief in connection with Crime No. 208 of 2025, alleged under Section 87 B.N.S. in Gorakhpur. No petitioner appeared before the Court; only the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Priyom in Criminal Case No. 318 of 2025, which alleged offences under IPC sections 137(2) and 64(2)(1) and sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant asserted that he was falsely implicated and that the victim’s statement under …
Manu Kumari and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and charge‑sheet filed in Crime No. 195 of 2025 under Sections 137(2) and 61(2). No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anshur, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the alleged victim had consented to the relationship, …
The petitioners sought a writ challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0214 of 2025 under Sections 85, 109 and 115(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The police had already …
The applicant, Ramcharan @ Golu, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in a criminal case (Sections 504, 506, 306 IPC). The counsel later limited the prayer to seeking permission to surrender and to have a bail application heard …
The petitioner, Mange Ram, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0385 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the …
The petitioners sought a writ challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 49 of 2025, alleging improprieties in the FIR and investigation under various IPC and D.P. Act provisions. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge‑sheet in Crime No. 0119 of 2025 under Section 137(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. They sought to quash the FIR and the charge‑sheet on the ground that the police had not properly investigated. The …
The petitioner, Amit Verma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0354 of 2025, which alleged his involvement under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, while …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0217 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under Sections 142, 87, 74 and 61(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shah Nawaz, who was arrested in a NDNDPS case (Sections 8 and 20) for alleged possession of 16.5 kg of ganja and joint possession of 148 kg recovered from a container. …
The applicant, Nadeem Ahmad, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 143 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant had married the victim on 29 January 2024, a fact documented …
The petitioner, Umesh Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the subsequent filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0312 of 2024 under Section 103 BNS. The petition sought judicial intervention to question the police's investigation and the charge sheet. The High …
Manish and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 402 of 2025 under Section 316(2) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The …
The petitioners sought a writ to quash the First Information Report and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0216 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under various IPC sections and the D.P. Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government …
The petitioners Shashank @ Shashank Bind @ Bholu filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 442 of 2025 under Sections 137(2) and 87 BNS. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by Additional Government …
The petitioner, Pramod Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 176 of 2025, which alleged his involvement under Sections 69, 191(2), 115(2) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, while …
The petitioner, Gurjeet Diwan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised call before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had already been filed, as per a …
The petitioners, Yogendra Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 177 of 2025 under Sections 329(3) of the BNS and Sections 2, 3, 5 of the Prevention of Damages of Public Property Act, 1984. The High Court noted that the charge …
The petitioners, Amar Singh and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0183 of 2025 under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State was represented by Additional …
The petitioner, Narottam Das Patel, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0077 of 2025 under Section 137(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petition was filed despite the petitioner’s absence, and the State was represented by an …
The petitioner, Deepak Chauhan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet (Crime No. 0860 of 2025) under Sections 310(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an …
The petitioner, Sanjay Alias Sanju Pateria, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet (Crime No. 232 of 2025) under several sections of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The petition sought to quash the charge sheet on the ground that the FIR was …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the charge sheet …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the charge sheet rendered …
The petitioners, Munna Lal and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a charge sheet …
Krishna Shukla alias Golo Shukla filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 21133 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 300 of 2025, which alleged his involvement under several IPC sections. No petitioner appeared before the court, …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, through the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court examined whether the petition could proceed given the …
The applicant, Gaurav Gautam, was facing trial under Section 376 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences. He and the victim had married on 19 October 2022, had a child, and executed a compromise deed. Both parties, including the victim, admitted the marriage and the …
The petitioner, Sangeeta Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against her. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 22 April 2026 from the Legal Cell of the Uttar …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0256 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under various IPC and D.P. Act provisions. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional …
Smt. Vimlesh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 199 of 2025 under Sections 87 BNS. The petition was presented without any petitioner appearing before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed by the Director …
The petitioners, represented by counsel, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 331 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under Sections 69, 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act. No petitioner …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed against the accused. The Court noted that the filing of …
The petitioners, Smt. Prachi and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 533 of 2025 under Section 87 of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional …
The petitioners, Nandkesh Mishra and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0020 of 2025 under Sections 85, 80(2), 352 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dangerous Drugs and …
The petitioners Vinay @ Vijay Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0263 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 80(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dangerous Drugs …
The petitioner, Radha, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR (Crime No. 0367 of 2024) that alleged her involvement in offences under Sections 352, 115(2), 333, 109, 118(2) and 191(1) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner counsel appeared before the Court, while the State …
The petitioner Tika Ram filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State's Additional Government Advocate appeared. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had already …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but mediation between the parties failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either side to argue the petition. The court noted the absence of representation and the failure of mediation. Consequently, the judges dismissed …
The petitioner, Devraj Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Attorney General, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 22 April 2026 from …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The High Court noted that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed, as per a report from the Legal Cell of the Uttar Pradesh Police. Since the charge sheet was on record, the Court held …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The petition was heard in the revised call, with no petitioner present and the State represented by an AGA. The court noted that the charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report from the …
The petitioners Bineet Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, opposed the petition. The court noted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a …
The petitioners, Khalid and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 113 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under various IPC sections. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, while the State was represented by the …
The petitioner, Smt. Neha, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0087 of 2025, which involved offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought to question the first information report and the subsequent charge …
The petitioners, Updesh Singh and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Advocate General, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been …
Petitioners Rajkumar and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet in Crime No. 383 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 61(2)(a), 111, 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, …
The petitioners sought a writ to quash the First Information Report and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 254 of 2025, alleging their involvement in offences under various IPC sections. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The …
Brijendra Kumar Yadav and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 136 of 2025 under Sections 80, 85, 351(2), 352 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dangerous Drugs Act. The petitioners were not present to press the writ, while the …
The petitioners Hemlata and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 223 of 2024, which alleged their involvement under Sections 85, 80 BNS read with Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, while …
The petitioner, Sonu Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0313 of 2025, which alleged his involvement under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an …
The petitioners, Guru Dutt and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Director General of Police, submitted a charge sheet, as reflected in an office report dated 22‑04‑2026. The Court …
Petitioners Rampyare Yadav and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed by …
The petitioners, Sakshi Tiwari and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet …
The petitioners, Smt. Radha and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 289 of 2025, which involved sections 191(2), 331(6), 351(3) and 137(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the Court; only the …
The petitioner, Vikram Singh Bhadauria, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0348 of 2025, which alleged his involvement under Sections 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …
The petitioners, Anil Thakur and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State’s Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that a charge‑sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …
The petitioners, Ajay Bind @ Achhelal and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken …
The petitioner, Sachin, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0087 of 2025 under Sections 316(5), 317(4) and 61(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, but the State was represented by an Additional …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a charge sheet …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted that, despite the filing of the charge …
The petitioner, Brijesh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a charge …
The petitioners Ashu Yadav and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet in the case had already …
The petitioners sought relief to prevent their arrest pending the filing of a charge sheet. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Neeraj Vats, who was arrested in a NDPS case involving the alleged recovery of 182 kg of ganja from a container shared with co‑accused. The applicant claimed …
Yogendra Mishra and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that a charge sheet had already …
The petitioners, Ikra Bi and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Prashant Kumar, who was charged under Sections 87, 137(2), 64(1) of the same Act and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, noting …
The petitioners, Muzaffar Ali and 23 others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed by the Director …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that the filing …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the …
Vivek Sharma, a government employee, filed a writ petition seeking promotion after being exonerated in a disciplinary inquiry dated 16‑06‑2023. The State had not taken a final decision on his case, whereas a similar case involving Arun Kumar Sharma was resolved on 22‑08‑2024 with the inquiry report …
The petitioner Pradeep filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised call before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had already been filed, as per a report from …
The applicant, Smt. Soofia Sultana, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 730 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. The counsel for the applicant was Manu Saxena, while no counsel appeared for the opposite parties. No appearance was made by the applicant to press …
The petitioner, Murari alias Krishna Murari, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by counsel. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had …
The petitioner, Babu alias Babulal, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that a charge sheet had already …
The petitioner Rajeev filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the FIR registered against him. The petition was filed after the investigation had progressed and a charge‑sheet had already been filed by the police. The respondents, the State of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, through the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court …
The petitioner, Smt. Meena, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from potential arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …
