Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 12601–12800
The petitioners, Naushad Khan and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Advocate General, opposed the petition. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had …
The petitioners, Asgar Husain, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 22 …
The petitioner, Rizwan Ahmad, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by the Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that the charge sheet in …
The petitioner, Smt. Rajani Shakya, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against her. The State, represented by the Attorney General, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 22 April 2026 from the Legal Cell of the Director …
Usha Devi and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against arrest. The State informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The Court noted the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the …
The petitioners, Akash Tyagi and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that …
Yog Sagar, accused under IPC Section 376 and POCSO Act Sections 3 and 4, had been in jail since July 2023. After a first bail application was rejected, a second application was filed arguing that he is a law‑abiding citizen, has cooperated with the investigation, faces no risk of tampering with …
The petitioners, Mamta Bajpayee and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22‑04‑2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet …
Petitioners Vijendra Singh and Anjali, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their married life and to provide them protection, alleging that the father of the wife was harassing them. The petition relied on the Supreme Court’s decision …
The petitioners, Sahil Maggu and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the charge sheet in …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either side to argue the petition. The court noted the absence of representation and, consequently, dismissed the petition. No substantive …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest, but no counsel appeared on his behalf. The Attorney General for the State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed, though it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …
The petitioner, Anurag Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ …
The petitioner, Maharaj, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State of U.P. and others responded, indicating that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The petitioners argued that …
Petitioner Roopesh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High …
The petitioner, Surendra Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by its Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that the charge sheet in …
Petitioners Safi Ullah and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State submitted a charge sheet on 22 April 2026, as reflected in the legal cell’s report. The Court observed that the filing of the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a charge …
The petitioners, Mohd. Asim and seven others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, appeared before the bench. The court noted that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed, as …
The petitioner, Mukesh Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the charge sheet …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but mediation between the parties failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either side to argue the petition. The court noted the absence of representation and, consequently, dismissed the petition. The dismissal was based …
The petitioner, Jaihind Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High …
Smt Shifa Salmani filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 21857 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and eight others. The petitioner’s counsel was absent and no interim relief had been sought or granted. The court observed that the petition had …
Smt. Shoyeba Khatoon and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioners. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. …
The petitioners, Saurabh @ Yogesh Kumar and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The petitioners argued that without …
The petitioner, Bablu @ Mohammad Kashif, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …
The petitioner, Lalit @ Lalle, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …
Petitioners Rajnish Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the …
The petitioners, Sartaj and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioners, while the State's counsel indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …
The petitioners, Munavvar alias Manvvar and seven others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two other respondents. The court noted that mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 22029 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel was not present, and no interim order had been passed. The court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. Consequently, the court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ …
Petitioners Mohammad Alam and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. No counsel appeared for them. The Attorney General for the State informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …
A criminal miscellaneous writ petition was filed by Arshad seeking relief, but no counsel appeared for the petitioner. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed, though it was unclear whether the trial court had taken …
The petitioners, Rahmat Ali and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High …
Petitioners Abhay Singh and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The parties attempted mediation, which failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or respondents to argue the petition. The Court noted the …
The petitioners, Ramkaran alias Kariya and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State of U.P. and others responded, and the Attorney General informed the court that a charge sheet had already been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had …
The petitioner, Seema, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 21875 of 2025) against the State of U.P. and three others. The parties attempted mediation, which ultimately failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioner or the respondents to argue the petition. The Court …
Mohd. Salim alias Lalu filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the prospect of his arrest in a case where a charge sheet had been filed by the investigating officer. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that while the charge sheet was submitted, it …
The petitioners, Abhishek Tyagi and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioners, and the State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial …
The petitioner, Rohit Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State of U.P. submitted that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in …
Petitioners Dhananjay Yadav and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging their potential arrest. No petitioner appeared before the court. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Advocate General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the …
The petitioner, Sheela Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High …
Javed Ali was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a 17‑year‑old girl. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the Evidence Act suggested consent and she refused a medical examination, resulting in no forensic corroboration. The …
The petitioner, Ankit Rastaugi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, and the State, represented by G.A., informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance …
Petitioners Vinita Kumari and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from possible arrest. The State's counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, …
The petitioner, Vinayak Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the existence of an interim …
Pawan Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from a possible arrest. The State of U.P. submitted a charge sheet, but the court was uncertain whether cognizance of the charge sheet had been taken by the trial court. Relying on the existence of an interim order in the writ …
Mohd. Sharif alias Raju filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against his arrest. The State of U.P. submitted that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The Allahabad High Court, noting the …
Petitioners Pappu Sonkar and another filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated. No …
Petitioners Jyoti and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted that, pending clarification on …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim …
Indrajeet and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against their arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioners. The Attorney General for the State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance …
The petitioner, owner of the offending vehicle, challenged a Motor Accident Claim Tribunal order that rejected his application under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC on the basis that it was filed beyond 30 days and lacked a date of knowledge. The petitioner argued that he had not been served notice and …
Anil Kumar Mishra and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 22132 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four others. The petitioners argued that they might be arrested despite a charge sheet having been filed, but it was …
The petitioners, Brijesh Kumar and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from potential arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Advocate General, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …
Sachin Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, while the State's Additional Advocate General informed that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High …
The petitioners, Zaid Ahmad and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest, but did not appear before the court. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed, yet it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ekta Anand in a criminal case (Crime No. 435 of 2025) involving alleged fraud under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 315(2). The applicant claimed that the sole amount transferred to her account was Rs. 50,000, part of a settlement …
The petitioner, Saleem, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed by the investigating officer, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted …
Rishipal Singh Yadav, detained since 8 December 2020, sought bail in a case (Crime No.141 of 2010) involving alleged fraud and cheating under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. His earlier bail application was rejected because he is a prior convict, including a murder conviction, and has …
Petitioners Mohd Aamil Hasan and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …
The applicant, Sahid Ansari alias Sahjaad, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad seeking release from custody. The State of Uttar Pradesh opposed the bail. The court examined the application and referred to the order passed in the leading …
The appellant, Duryodhan Prasad Arya, purchased a vehicle that was later discovered to be stolen and entered into a compromise for its return, after which the seller failed to refund the purchase price. The appellant filed an application under Section 173(4) of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to …
The petition was filed by Ranjeet Singh, a husband‑advocate, seeking the High Court’s supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 to expedite a maintenance application (Section 144, BNSS 2023) against his wife, Neetu Singh, a government employee. The husband claimed he was unemployed and dependent, …
The petitioners, Mohammad Salman Siddiqui and four others, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. The petition sought relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Prem Prakash Bharti, who was accused under Section 316(5) BNS for alleged misappropriation of paddy procurement funds while serving as In‑charge of a Paddy Procurement Center. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, that he had …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ritik, who is charged with assault by firearm under Sections 109(1) and 115(2) of the same statute and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. The applicant …
The petitioner, Kumari Sharmila, a teacher, challenged a punitive transfer and suspension order dated 17 September 2025 issued by the District Basic Education Officer, alleging that it was based on a complaint of forged signatures and was passed without a proper enquiry, violating principles of …
The applicants, Shekhar Saini and another, filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the summons and the entire criminal proceeding (Complaint No. 45 of 2024) filed by Smt. Lakshmi under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High Court had earlier …
The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the order dated 26 September 2023 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagina, and the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 256 of 2023 under Sections 18‑22 of the Domestic Violence Act. The matter had been referred …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained a criminal revision filed by Juvenile X, aged 17 years 11 months, seeking bail after being detained since August 2024. The revision challenged the order of the Child Court/Additional Sessions Judge, Banda, which had denied bail under Section 12 of the Juvenile …
The petitioners, Satyendra Singh and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. The High Court, after hearing counsel for the opposite party, found that the application was not pursued with sufficient prosecution. …
Petitioner Veena Gupta filed a writ petition challenging two orders of the Aligarh Development Authority issued under Sections 28A(4) and 28A(1) of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. The petitioner later informed the Court that she does not wish to pursue the writ and intends to use …
The applicant, Satyendra Kumar Srivastava, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking relief. The matter was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant even after the revised call, while the State's …
M/s Rani Promoters Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and no adjournment was sought. The court held that the cause of action had become stale due to the petitioner’s …
The complainant, Baba @ Baburam, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the order dated 11 September 2025 passed by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) which set aside a trial court summoning order and remanded the matter for fresh hearing. The trial court had earlier summoned …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd. Yusuf Khan, who was charged under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged fraud. The applicant argued that he had returned the entire amount of Rs.176,000 received from the informant, as ordered by a …
The applicant Rahul, charged under Sections 115(2), 64 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, has been in judicial custody since 21 October 2024. He filed a second bail application, arguing that his prolonged detention of over one and a half years violates his Article 21 …
The applicants filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash the summons dated 15‑03‑2023 and the entire criminal proceedings (Cr. Misc. Case No. 1140 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Domestic Violence Act. The trial court had earlier …
Smt. Savitri Devi, the widow of the late Dulare Lal, a retired Executive Officer of Nagar Panchayat Ghiror, filed a writ petition seeking the payment of his post‑retirement benefits, including pension, gratuity, GPF, and family pension, which remained unpaid after his death in 2020. The petitioner …
The applicant, Jasim alias Abdul Rahman, sought bail in a fraud case (Criminal No. 277 of 2025) alleging that he and co‑accused Sheebu defrauded an informant of Rs.8,65,000. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, that Sheebu was the principal offender and had already been released …
The applicant, Bhola Shukla, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summoning order dated 24.01.2020 and the charge sheet dated 27.12.2018 in a criminal case (Case No. 1585 of 2020) arising from FIR No. 503 of 2018 under Section 506 IPC. He alleged that the FIR was …
The appellant, a Scheduled Caste medical student, filed an application under Section 173(4) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita seeking registration of a cognizable offence under the SC/ST Act after being assaulted and threatened on campus. The Special Judge treated the application as a …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajveer Singh Yadav, who was accused under several IPC sections for allegedly hurting Hindu religious sentiments through a book he edited and statements attributed to a co‑accused. The FIR was originally against Saroj Sargam; Yadav was …
The applicant, Majhale @ Veeresh, sought bail in a session case involving alleged rape, blackmail, and the circulation of a pornographic video under Sections 376‑D, 34, 506 IPC, Sections 5(G)/6 POCSO Act and Section 67 of the IT Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant seized the victim’s …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent to consider and decide his representations dated 04.01.2024, 22.09.2024 and 20.03.2025 for the grant of an All‑India arms licence. The petitioner alleged that despite submitting all required …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Yadram, who was arrested in connection with a 2017 case alleging offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and IT Act section 66. The applicant, an employee of a …
The petitioner, Avinash Kumar Srivastava, was initially appointed as a daily‑wage steno‑cum‑typist in 1990 and later converted to a co‑adunate employee, with his regularisation pending while juniors were regularised earlier. He filed a writ petition seeking regularisation effective from 1 April …
The appellants, bank officials, were summoned by a Special Judge under Section 504 IPC and Sections 3(1)(da) and 3(1)(dha) of the SC/ST Act based on a complaint alleging caste‑based abuse and threats in a bank branch. The investigating officer’s inquiry, supported by CCTV footage and statements of …
The petition filed by Kumari Saniya Khan under Article 227 was not pursued by the petitioner, resulting in no substantive hearing. The court observed that there was no appearance to press the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction for the State authorities to demarcate and construct a Chak Road over two plots in Siuridih village, Ghazipur. The Court had earlier directed the authorities on 21‑01‑2026 to take action. A personal affidavit filed by the …
The petitioner, Ramjas @ Ramyash Yadav, filed a public interest writ seeking the removal of an encroachment on a 0.0220 hectare plot (Gata No.62) in Village Bangaon, Jaunpur, allegedly occupied by respondent No.6, Kamlesh Yadav. The High Court, recalling its earlier direction dated 10‑Feb‑2026, …
Manoj Sahani, accused under IPC sections 498A, 304B and the Domestic Violence Act for the alleged dowry‑related death of his wife, has been in judicial custody since June 2022. He filed a second bail application, arguing that the trial has been delayed for almost four years because prosecution …
The petitioner, Fateh Singh, filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to evict alleged illegal occupants (respondents 5‑7) from Plot Nos. 43 and 56, recorded as Chakroad in the revenue records of Village Amargarhi Majra …
Shambhu Nath filed a civil contempt application (No. 6380 of 2025) against Anurag Srivastava, the District Basic Education Officer, alleging non‑compliance with a writ order. The applicant's counsel, Satyendra Chandra Tripathi, informed the court that the writ order had been fully complied with, …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0649 of 2024, which involved Sections 115(2), 109(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 76 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, but the State was …
The petitioners sought a writ to challenge the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 327 of 2024, relating to an FIR under Section 137(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court noted …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0348 of 2024 under Sections 87, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while an Additional Government Advocate represented the State. The …
The petitioners, Rahul Yadav and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered under Sections 318(4), 316(2) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 335 of 2024. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State was represented by Additional …
The petitioners, Mogees and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 384 of 2024, which was based on an FIR under Sections 82(1), 85, 351(2), 115(2) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought judicial intervention to …
Jamuna Prasad appealed against the order of the Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act) dated 7 October 2024 which dismissed his second protest petition ex parte on the ground of non‑prosecution. The appellant argued that he could not appear due to illness and that the order was passed without affording him a …
The petitioners, Talib and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that a charge sheet had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikas Pasi, who was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code for assaulting an informant, resulting in injury to the informant's hand, a non‑vital part. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, the injury was minor, …
Ram Nain Yadav and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 627 of 2024 under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. No petitioner appeared before the Court; …
Jaswant Singh filed a criminal complaint under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code alleging that Rs 2,00,000 was transferred by his friend to Respondent No. 2 for the latter’s hospital, but the money was not returned, leading to a claim of cheating. The Chief Judicial Magistrate dismissed …
The petitioners, Gaurav Gupta and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the non‑submission of a charge sheet in the case. The petitioner’s counsel noted that the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police, U.P., had sent information that a charge sheet had been filed, …
The petitioners Rakesh Chandra and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that a charge sheet had …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 514 of 2024, which involved alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 125 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought relief against the FIR and the subsequent …
The petitioner, Govind Nishad, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the revised call before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court, with no petitioner representation present. The court noted that the charge …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arun Kumar in a criminal case (Crime No. 628 of 2024) involving alleged forgery of a sale deed and property possession. The applicant argued that the sale deed was forged, that a rent agreement and a civil suit settlement demonstrated the dispute …
The petitioner, Mohd Islam Raja, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the Allahabad High Court, but the petitioner was not present while the State's counsel appeared. The court noted that a charge sheet had already been filed, …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 213 of 2021) arising from alleged offences under Sections 376, 452, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicants proved that the accused had …
The petitioners, Smt Nisha Paraveen and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the charge …
The applicant, Janu @ Ramakant Sharma, was charged with rape, criminal intimidation and offences under the POCSO and IT Acts, alleged to have possessed and helped viral a indecent video of the victim. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, along with co‑accused, raped the victim and blackmailed …
The petitioners Ramu Pandit and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge‑sheet in Crime No. 0328 of 2024, which arose from an FIR under IPC sections 109, 190, 191(2) and 191(3). The petition sought to quash the FIR/charge‑sheet on the ground that the …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the charge sheet filed in Crime No. 366 of 2024 (Sections 331(4), 305(a), 62 BNS) by the Saharanpur Police. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by Additional …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …
The petitioners, Gudiya Devi and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the …
The petitioners Rohit Choudhary filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 22 April 2026 from the Legal Cell of the …
The petitioners, Smt Kajal Devi and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0513 of 2024, which alleged their involvement under Sections 87, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought judicial intervention to quash …
The petitioner, Ashish Mohan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that a charge sheet …
The petitioners, Suraj Mishra and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report …
The petitioner sought a writ directing the removal of illegal encroachments by respondents 6 and 7 on a 0.607‑hectare pond (Gata No.217) in Barahi Sahora village, Budaun. The Court noted earlier orders granting time to the standing counsel, which were not utilized. It relied on a Division Bench …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 333 of 2024, which alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and a Uttar Pradesh minor minerals rule. The petition sought judicial intervention to quash the …
Ram Briksha Yadav filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Azamgarh, which dismissed an application under CrPC Section 227 to frame a charge under IPC Section 308 against four accused, on the ground that there was no material evidence. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that the filing of a charge sheet …
The petitioner Seema Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered against her. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that a charge sheet …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22‑04‑2026 indicating that the police had already filed a …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0432 of 2024, which alleged their involvement under Sections 80(2) & 85 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Delhi Police Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, …
The petitioners, represented by counsel Brijesh Kumar Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR against them. The State, represented by G.A., submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking compliance with the filing of a charge sheet. The High Court noted that the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police, U.P., had sent information that a charge sheet had been filed, but the petitioner's counsel sought …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed on 22 April 2026. The Court noted that the filing of a …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the charge sheet rendered …
The petitioners Zulfukar Ahmad and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioner, Shameem Ansari, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that the …
Petitioner Swarn Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the learned Additional Government Advocate represented the State. The court examined a report dated …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR against them. The petition was filed after the police had already filed a charge sheet, as indicated by a report from the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police, …
Petitioners Rani and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, through the A.G.A., informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The Court noted the existence of an …
The petitioner, Mubarak, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the revised call before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court, with no petitioner counsel appearing and the State represented by an Additional …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed by the police. The Court noted that …
Constable Driver Amjad Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by an AGA. The court noted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report from …
The petitioners Prabhavati Devi and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The High Court …
The petitioners, Saurabh @ Sunny and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The respondents, the State of UP and two others, submitted a charge sheet in the underlying criminal case. The petitioners' counsel argued that the filing …
Constable Atul and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the petition …
The petitioners, Smt Sana Khatoon and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …
The petitioner, Ambuj Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 22 April 2026 from the Legal Cell of the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the …
The petitioners, Maheshchand and six others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …
Petitioners Tara Chand and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …
Shiv Pratap Singh filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh to decide his application concerning encroachments on a village chakroad over plots 316 and 314. The petitioner alleged that tenure‑holders and a respondent had built structures on the chakroad, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and summoning order issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate in a case arising from alleged trespass and theft. They contended that the investigation was improper, the charge sheet was filed …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shiv Shankar Kannaujia, who is charged under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC for alleged involvement in fraudulent sale deeds and a bank loan. The applicant, a proprietor of M/s Radhika Colonizers Private Limited, contended that …
The petitioners sought relief through a criminal miscellaneous writ petition, but mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue the petition. The court noted the absence of representation and, consequently, dismissed the …
Manoj Kumar Sain filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State of Uttar Pradesh and two others responded, stating that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear if the trial court had taken cognizance. The High Court noted the existence of an interim …
The applicant Sabhajeet Mishra, a police Sub Inspector, filed a bail application in Case Crime No. 126 of 2025 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 447, 506, 452, 384, 307, 34 and 120B IPC, Police Station Gwaltoli, District Kanpur Nagar. The allegation against him was that he, along with co-accused …
The appellants, Mohd Khalid and another, filed a criminal appeal against the State of U.P. and another. Their counsel, Istyak Khan, informed the court that the dispute had been amicably settled outside the court and that they did not wish to pursue the appeal. The court, upon receiving this …
The petitioner, Sushil Chaudhary, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court …
The petitioners, Kasim and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief. The court noted that mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue the petition. In the absence of any representation, …
Petitioners Gayatri Prasad Verma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …
The petitioner, Om Kumar Gupta, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the prospect of his arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …
Petitioner Param Hans Gupta filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The Court, after hearing counsel, directed the investigating officer to conclude the investigation against the petitioner and to inform the Court of the outcome. The matter was listed for …
The petitioners, Km Sonali and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and the magistrate's cognizance order in a criminal case arising from a land‑dispute‑related assault alleged in FIR No. 583 of 2024. They contended that the allegations were false, the injuries …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case alleging offences under IPC Sections 352, 351(2) and 333. They contended that the investigation was flawed, the statements of the complainant and witnesses were …
Shiv Kumar filed a writ petition (Writ C No. 41353 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel later informed the court that the relief sought had become infructuous. The court considered whether the …
The applicant Jaypal filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 20‑12‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 23‑12‑2024 in a criminal case pending before the Additional District Judge, Bareilly. The applicant and opposite party No.2 (Zulekha Begum) had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramashray Prajapati, who is charged under several IPC sections including 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 352 and 351(3)BNS for allegedly misappropriating Rs 35 lakh invested by his wife and son. The applicant contended that the allegations …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ranjeet, accused in a case under Sections 85, 80(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act, relating to the death of his wife who allegedly committed suicide by hanging. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Amit Kashyap, who was arrested in connection with a fraud case (Criminal No. 480 of 2024) involving alleged fake bank accounts and misappropriation of loan amounts under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. The applicant, a recovery agent, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 6357 of 2022) arising from a 2021 crime complaint. They claimed that they had reached an amicable compromise with the State and wished to avoid adjudication of the alleged offences. …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Pavitra Dixit, who is charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC for a crime registered in Ghaziabad. The applicant had been in custody since 27 August 2022, amounting to more than half the maximum term of imprisonment for the offences. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for two accused in a case registered under Sections 8, 20, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act involving alleged recovery of 40 kg of ganja each from two vehicles. The applicants contended …
The petitioner, Ravi Chand Srivastava, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Employees' Provident Fund Commissioner to decide his representation dated 16 June 2025, which had remained pending since 2025. He alleged that the unexplained delay was arbitrary, contrary to legal principles, …
The appellant, Dheeraj Raj, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four others. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant, Gulab Yadav, informed the court that the dispute had been amicably settled out of court and that the appellant no longer wished to pursue the …
The appellant, Parmeshwari Dayal, filed an intra-court appeal before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, counsel for the appellant submitted a withdrawal application seeking to withdraw the appeal. The respondents' counsel, Gaurav Gautam, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court examined …
The appellant, Om Prakash, appealed a trial court order that rejected his application under Section 173(4) of the BNSS, filed under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The dispute concerned a boundary wall and pillar, with a related civil suit pending, and …
The petitioner, Rakesk Kumar Singh, filed Writ Petition No. 43402 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel, Umendra Kumar Yadav, moved the Court seeking to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to file any appropriate application before the …
The petitioners, CNH Udyog Karamchari Sangh & Anr., filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a matter for which an alternative statutory remedy under Section 11 of the Trade Union Act was available. The respondents argued that the petition was not maintainable because the …
Petitioners Tanuj Jain and another filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the Meerut Development Authority. The respondents argued that the petition was not maintainable because the petitioners could obtain relief under Section 41(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban …
Chandra Pal (applicant) claimed that the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) had utilized an excess of 0.075 hectare of his land beyond the published acquisition area for a highway project and that compensation for this excess land had not been paid. The High Court, in a writ order dated 10 …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 3143 of 2024, alleging that they had amicably settled the dispute with Opposite Party No.2. The trial court verified the compromise, and Opposite Party No.2 expressed no desire …
The applicant, Shoaib alias Sonu, was arrested in connection with a murder alleged to have arisen from a salary dispute. The FIR broadly implicated all accused, but CCTV footage showed that the applicant only had a brief scuffle with the deceased, after which co‑accused Shahnawaz attacked the victim …
The High Court considered the bail application of Suresur Kumar Yadav, who is charged with rape of a minor under Sections 70(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5(G) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the offence occurred on 5 July 2025, but the FIR was filed three …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Salman, accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 682 of 2025) under IPC sections 69 and 351(2) for allegedly establishing a false marital relationship with a 20‑year‑old victim and later reneging on the promise. The applicant’s counsel argued that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Aslam, who was arrested on 24‑12‑2024 for alleged possession of 210 kg of ganja in connection with an NDPS case (Sections 8, 20, 29). The applicant claimed innocence, …
The applicant Gopal filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 26‑09‑2025 issued by the Special Judge (POCSO Act) in a case involving offences under Sections 363, 376D IPC and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant …
The applicant, Smt. Bala, filed a criminal complaint (No.641 of 2024) alleging offences under IPC sections 427 and 323 and the trial court summoned two accused based on prima facie evidence. Dissatisfied with the trial court’s order dated 22‑08‑2024, the applicant sought revision before the …
The father of Mahak filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that his daughter, a 19‑year‑old adult, was being illegally detained by private respondents. The court produced Mahak, who testified that she is a major, voluntarily residing with respondent No.6 Raja, and not under any illegal detention. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nagendra Choudhary in a case involving alleged firearm injuries leading to death. The prosecution alleged that the applicant fired at the deceased, but CCTV footage, as highlighted by both parties, showed that the co-accused Mohit was the one who …
The petitioners, Smt. Deepika Verma and Amit Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to restrain the State of U.P. and two other respondents from interfering in their married life, raiding their house, and threatening them. The respondents' standing counsel informed the court that the first …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jayprakash, who is accused under IPC sections 69, 333, 115(2), 352 and 351(2) for allegedly entering into a false promise of marriage and subsequently refusing to fulfil it. The prosecution alleged that the applicant misled the victim, while the …
The applicant, Anoop Kumar, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 311 of 2025) under Sections 64, 123, 87 of the Indian Penal Code. The victim’s statement under Section 183 indicated she was a consenting party and had seen the applicant with her family before he fled the scene. The FIR was …
Petitioner Akabar Naeem filed a writ petition (WRIT-A No. 2773 of 2019) before the Allahabad High Court. The case was listed under a non‑adjournable list, but the petitioner failed to prosecute the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any …
The petitioner, Akbar Naeem, filed Writ A No. 2420 of 2015 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of U.P. through the Principal Secretary, Minority Welfare Department. The petition was listed under a special roster stating that such cases shall not be …
Petitioner Akbar Naim filed a writ petition (WRIT-A No. 3331 of 2002) before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed under a non‑adjournable list, but no further prosecution was undertaken by the petitioner. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated …
Smt. Brija filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 22190 of 2018) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. through the Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department and others. No petitioner appeared before the Court and no request for adjournment was made. The Court observed …
