Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 12801–13000
The applicants Vipul Mishra and others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 2829 of 2018) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. The application was listed under Chapter 12 Rule 4 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952. The court noted, via an office …
The petitioner Karim filed a writ petition (WRIT‑B No. 6191 of 1978) before the Allahabad High Court. The petition remained pending for many years and, on the date of hearing, no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The court noted that the matter was very old, dating …
The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed the acquittal of Sheodan Singh and others by the Special Judge, Agra, who held that the prosecution had not proved the essential ingredients of an offence under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The trial court observed …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 11‑April‑2013 and related proceedings in a case involving offences under IPC sections 323, 324, 325 and 504. The applicants and the second opposite party had amicably settled the dispute and the latter …
Mangey Ram filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge (Special Judge, SC/ST Act) which upheld his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and affirmed a sentence of one year imprisonment with a …
The applicants, Tipu and others, filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash the criminal proceeding S.T. No.1915 of 2024 (State vs. Tipu et al.) arising from a 2018 case under IPC sections 307, 504 and 506. The parties had amicably settled the dispute out of court, and the opposite …
The petitioner, Charu Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking to quash an order dated 30 September 2024 passed by the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court No.1, Meerut in a family law case. The petition alleged that the family court order should be set …
Rahul filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 6736 of 2020) against Manju Garg in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioner and the petition was not prosecuted. The Court found no basis to proceed and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order …
Deepak was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kanpur Dehat, under IPC sections 308, 323 and 324 for stabbing the complainant, causing serious internal injuries that required surgery. The trial court held that while the injuries were grave, the prosecution failed to prove an intention to …
The High Court considered the fifth bail application of Pradeep @ Chhote, who has been in jail for about four years on a charge of murder under Section 307 IPC. Earlier four bail applications had been rejected or withdrawn, and the trial court had been directed to complete the trial within one year, …
A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 6062 of 2016) was filed by Lucknow Diocesan Trust Association Property Trust against Anil Goel and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Rajesh Mishra, did not appear before the court. The respondents, represented by Madan Mohan Chaurasisa and Vinayak Mithal, were present. …
The applicants Bhola and Neelu were charged in FIR No. 405 of 2025 for assaulting Manoj with a baton, causing serious head injuries and a fractured arm. They applied for bail, claiming innocence and alleging that the incident stemmed from a matrimonial dispute involving the victim's wife. The State …
The petitioners, Smt. Shahida Khatoon and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 8325 of 2009) against the State of U.P. and another. The matter had been pending since 2009 and, at the time of hearing, no counsel appeared to press the application. The …
An application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Vishwanath and four others against the State of Uttar Pradesh. Counsel for the applicants, Beerendra Singh Pal and Manoj Kumar Keshari, appeared before the bench, while G.A. represented the opposite party. The learned …
The appellant, Chandra Pal Singh, appealed a 2009 award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and a 2025 order rejecting his application under Order 9 Rule 13 of the CPC. He had filed the application after a delay of 6,141 days, seeking condonation of the delay and relief from a recovery certificate …
The applicant, Asma @ Sahila, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a certified copy of the entire order sheet. The applicant requested a two‑week period to obtain and file the certified copy. The court examined whether it could exercise its discretion to …
The applicants filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 20‑02‑2025 and the cognizance‑summoning order dated 05‑12‑2025 in State v Kunwar Jyotiraditya Yadav, where the accused were charged under IPC sections 406, 420, 504 and 506. The applicants contended, relying on a …
The petitioners, Committee of Management of Smt. Ramadevi Shiksha Samiti, challenged an order of the Deputy Registrar that cancelled their elected list of office‑bearers and accepted the rival list submitted by Respondent‑4. The dispute arose from rival elections to fill casual vacancies after the …
Ram Singh Yadav was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehpur, under Sections 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to ten years rigorous imprisonment with a fine and an additional one‑year default term, along with a concurrent two‑year term for the lesser offence. He filed a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Azeom Husain, accused in a criminal case under Section 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for alleged knife assault causing grievous injuries to the victim Rizwan. The applicant's counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, had no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raja Garg (alias Pankaj Garg) in a criminal case under Sections 109 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR, and that the FIR was lodged 19 days after the alleged …
Madhav Prasad applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 416 of 2025) alleging false implication and a cross‑case scenario where both parties lodged FIRs over the same incident. The applicant claimed no prior criminal record and argued that the injuries were minor and that it was unclear who the …
The applicant, Himanshu Dubey, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute involving charges under Sections 498A, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant claimed that the parties had amicably settled …
Petitioner Baba Bhanwarnath Mandir Seva Samiti filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner's counsel later moved that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, and the respondent's counsel raised no objection. The court considered whether the petition could be withdrawn at …
The petitioner, Ribhu Dubey, was expelled from Gautam Buddha University and filed a writ petition challenging the expulsion. The petitioner’s counsel argued that an alternative remedy exists in the form of an appeal before the university's Board of Management. The university’s counsel raised no …
The applicants, Rihan and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and subsequent criminal proceedings arising from offences under Sections 323, 352, 504, 5506 and 308 IPC. The parties claimed they had amicably settled the dispute, and the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 22‑01‑2023 and the cognizance order dated 23‑04‑2024 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehpur, in a case arising from FIR No. 17 of 2023 alleging assault and threats under IPC …
The applicant Sonia filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 7416 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rampur, on the ground that she and the second opposite party had reached a compromise. Both parties …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and cognizance order in a criminal case (State vs. Mohd Tasleem et al.) on the ground that they had entered into a compromise deed with the co‑defendants. Both the co‑defendants …
The appellant Prashant Yadav was convicted by the Additional Session Judge for offences under Sections 307, 504, 506(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 of the Arms Act, based largely on the testimony of the complainant who later turned hostile and on the alleged recovery of a pistol from the …
The Allahabad High Court examined a bail application filed by Chhotu alias Anil Chauhan, who is charged in FIR No. 249 of 2025 for allegedly stabbing Jai Prakash Singh with a knife, causing grievous injuries. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that he was not arrested at the scene, no knife …
The appellant, Banarsi Lal Sharma, filed a first appeal seeking enhancement of a motor accident compensation award dated 18‑12‑2009. The appeal was filed after a delay of 7 years and 103 days, and the appellant sought condonation of the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The respondent …
The applicant, Farhat Rafiq, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant, Shri Mohd. Gufran, expressed that the applicant no longer wishes to pursue the bail relief and requested that the application be withdrawn. The …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sajid Khan, who was arrested in connection with a case under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant argued that he was …
The applicant, a Class‑XII student, was arrested in connection with FIR No. 444 of 2025 alleging that he stabbed a victim with a knife, violating Section 109 of the B.N.S. and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, had no prior record, and that no weapon or …
Vijay Kumar Pandey and others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 6556 of 2001 before the Allahabad High Court, challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petition was presented by counsel D.K. Singh and A.K. Rai, while the respondents were represented by the …
The appellants Saurabh Verma and two others appealed to quash a summoning order issued by the Special Judge in a case alleging offences under the IPC and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They contended that the FIR was fabricated, filed after an unreasonable delay, and motivated by a …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Tanu in a case under Sections 338, 336(3), 340(2), 318(4) and 61(2) of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S., alleging forgery of GST invoices and revenue loss. The applicant contended that he was not named in the FIR, had no prior criminal record, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered the bail application of Tanu, accused in case crime No. 471 of 2025 under sections 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 318(4) of the BNS. The Sessions Judge had denied bail and she had been in custody since 23 January 2026. The applicant contended that she was not named in …
The applicant, Sajid, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 68 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2) and 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 9M/10 of the POCSO Act. He claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR was filed due to a monetary dispute with the informant …
In Contempt Application (Civil) No. 1761 of 2017, Smt. Mithilesh Kumari Singh filed a petition against Dr. Saroj Kumar, the District Magistrate of Banda, and three others. The applicant was represented by counsel Ghanshyam Das Mishra, while the opposite parties were represented by C.S.C., S.C. The …
The applicant, Nagendra Kumar Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in Case No. 37 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 406 and 506 IPC arising from Crime No. 68 of 2020. The applicant argued that Sections 420 …
Ravindra filed suit seeking specific performance of a registered agreement to sell land dated 03.10.2022, having paid Rs 20 lakh and demanding the balance consideration of Rs 64.22 lakh, alternatively a refund with interest and an injunction against further transfer. The defendant, despite the …
Vikram Singh filed a criminal revision challenging the Additional Sessions Judge's order treating his Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. application as a complaint in a POCSO matter. He argued that the court erred in law, exceeded jurisdiction, and failed to order statutory medical investigation despite the …
The applicant, Priyanka Gupta, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 337 of 2025 seeking to move the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The court …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Elgin R. Singh, who was arrested in a case under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 relating to the alleged fraudulent sale of property belonging to the Methodist Church. The applicant contended that the sale was authorized by the Church’s …
Geeta Devi filed a criminal revision under Section 175(3) B.N.S.S. challenging a Judicial Magistrate's order that dismissed her application on the ground that the dispute was purely civil. She alleged that opposite parties fraudulently obtained a mutation of agricultural land belonging to her late …
The applicant, Chintu Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 03.07.2024 passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Aligarh, which directed him to pay interim maintenance of Rs.4,500 per month to his wife under …
Ram Subhag and others filed a writ petition (Writ B No. 3835 of 1980) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging actions of the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Faizabad and others. The petitioner's counsel, U.S. Sahai, informed the Court that he had no instructions to represent …
Durga Bux Singh and three others filed a writ petition (C No. 3000132 of 2002) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh through the Collector, Bahraich, and two other respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners and no request …
Ram Prakash Srivastava filed a writ petition (WRIT‑A No. 3804 of 2005) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. through the Secretary of Secondary Education, Lucknow, and four other respondents. The petition was presented by counsel G.C. Verma. The court noted that …
Akbar Ali filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. The High Court noted that neither the applicant nor the second opposite party were present, though the Government Advocate appeared. The Court found that the application was not …
The petitioner, Ram Lal, filed Writ Petition No. 147 of 1981 before the Allahabad High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner to press the petition. The court noted that an office report dated 17‑04‑2026 confirmed that notice served on the petitioner to engage another counsel was …
The petitioners, Babu Lal and others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The Court, on 2 December 2025, directed the petitioners to engage another counsel. A subsequent report dated 18 April 2026 indicated that the petitioners could not be located and their cover was returned …
The petitioners, Shri Sardar Singh and others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The Court, on 2 December 2025, ordered the petitioners to engage another counsel. A subsequent report dated 18 April 2026 indicated that no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners and no …
The petitioner, Somai, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. The court issued a notice on 5 December 2025 directing the petitioner to engage another counsel. Subsequent office reports dated 10 February, 25 March, and 18 April 2026 indicated that no undelivered cover was returned and no …
The petitioner, Sripati, filed Writ Petition No. 1907 of 1977 in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, and the petitioner failed to press the petition further. The court examined an office report dated 17‑April‑2026 which confirmed …
The petitioners, Umesh Rai and another, filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 09‑12‑2025 of the Special Judge (E.C. Act) that dismissed their application for discharge under Section 227 of the Cr.P.C. and Section 250(2) of the BNSS, 2023. The case involved charges under Sections …
The petitioner, Nikhidhi, filed Writ Petition No. 14540 of 1981 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents, D.D.C. and others. The matter was listed under the 'Oldest Pending Cases' for a priority hearing. On the scheduled date, no counsel or party appeared to press the …
The petitioner, Smt. Shanti Devi, filed a writ petition (Writ B No. 15128 of 1981) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and imposed a cost of Rs. 1000 to be deposited with the …
Badiuzzama (also known as Kasarzzama) filed a writ petition (Writ‑B No. 15427 of 1981) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against D.D.C. and others. The petition was listed for a priority hearing under the "Oldest Pending Cases" category. No counsel or parties appeared before the court …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ‑B No. 14665 of 1982) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered a cost of Rs. 1000 to be deposited with the High Court Legal …
Shawami Nath filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No parties appeared to press the petition on the scheduled hearing. The court noted the absence of any representation. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of want of prosecution. The order was pronounced by …
The petitioner, Gopal Dutt, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear or prosecute the case. No counsel appeared on his behalf to press the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and imposed a cost of Rs. 1,000 to be deposited …
The petitioner, Tulsi Das, filed Writ Petition No. 14142 of 1983 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents. The petition was listed for a priority hearing under the ‘Oldest Pending Cases’ category. No party, including the petitioner’s counsel, appeared before the court …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for its hearing. No counsel or parties were present to press the petition. The Court dismissed the petition on the ground of want of prosecution. The judgment notes that the petition may be recalled if the …
Hori Lal and others filed Writ Petition No. 15062 of 1983 against D.D.C. and others. The petitioners failed to appear before the court despite being served notice, as confirmed by an office report dated 17‑April‑2026 indicating sufficient service. No counsel was engaged by the petitioners. …
The petitioner, Bhaiya Lal, filed Writ Petition No. 1521 of 1983 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, and an office report dated 17‑04‑2026 confirmed that a notice was duly served on the petitioner to engage another counsel. Since the petitioner failed to …
A writ petition (Writ‑B No. 15936 of 1983) was filed by Lallan and others against D.D.C. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and imposed a cost of Rs. 1000 to be deposited in the High Court Legal …
The petitioner filed a writ petition (Writ No. 2027 of 1983) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel or party appeared to press the petition on the scheduled hearing date. The court noted the absence of any representation. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of want of …
The appeal was filed by Jai Singh and others against the State. During the pendency of the appeal, the Chief Judicial Magistrate reported that appellant No.1 Jai Singh and appellant No.2 Ram Swarup had died. The court considered whether the death of the appellants extinguished the proceedings. It …
The appellant Munnalal appealed against the acquittal of respondents Suraj Bhan and others on charges of criminal breach of trust under Sections 406 and 408 IPC. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code. During the pendency of the appeal, the two respondents died, as …
Om Prakash appealed a criminal conviction before the Allahabad High Court. While the appeal was pending, a report from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, dated 13 March 2026, confirmed that Om Prakash had died, and a death certificate was attached. The court considered whether the appeal could …
The appellant Kalwa filed a criminal appeal against the State of U.P. However, an office report dated 27 January 2026, based on a letter from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rampur dated 8 January 2026, revealed that Kalwa had died in the year 2000. The court examined whether the appeal could …
The appellant, Attaullah Khan, filed a criminal appeal (No. 451 of 1985) before the Allahabad High Court. The court, upon compliance with its earlier order dated 16‑03‑2021, received a report from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pilibhit, confirming that the appellant had died approximately 24 years …
The petitioner, Deep Chandra, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking bail. The State of Uttar Pradesh and another party opposed the application. The High Court observed that the petitioner did not appear before the court and there was no opposition from the …
The petition, filed in 1982, sought relief against the Deputy Director of Consolidation concerning a claim of adverse possession over land. The private respondent, represented by legal heirs, alleged title based on adverse possession, but the claim was rejected because the required possession …
Irfan Khan filed a writ petition (Writ‑B No. 1806 of 1982) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the Board of Revenue and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered the petitioner to pay …
Gudiya filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The applicant's learned counsel argued that the application had become ineffective and should not be entertained. The Court examined the pleadings and found that the application indeed lacked any operative …
The appellant, Om Prakash Ruiya, filed a criminal appeal (No. 3209 of 1984) before the Allahabad High Court. An office report dated 09 March 2026, based on a letter from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kushinagar dated 07 March 2026, informed the court that the sole appellant had died. The court …
The revision petition filed by Jitendra and others challenged the order of the Additional Session Judge who had framed charges against them under IPC sections 323, 324, 308, 504 and 506. The petitioners argued that the date of the alleged incident was inconsistent in witness statements and that the …
Amit Sharma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking bail. The State of U.P. and another party were served as respondents. No opposition counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, and no other parties were present. The High Court observed that in the absence of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Appeal No. 04 of 2021) pending before the Civil Judge/FTC, Jalaun, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry …
The petitioners Praveen Kaushik and two others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court (Application No. 3223 of 2022) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The matter was listed before Hon’ble Justice Gautam …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State’s Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim …
Petitioners Dinesh @ Vinit and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others, seeking relief that is not specified in the record. The petitioners' counsel, Devendra Pratap Yadav, was not present before the …
The applicant, Abhinandan Barnwal, filed a civil contempt application against Sub Inspector Vivek Singh, alleging contempt of a prior writ order dated 11 December 2025. The High Court examined the writ order and the State’s reply, particularly paragraph 8 which set out the reasons for the alleged …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 12‑02‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 27‑02‑2024 in Criminal Case No.1122 of 2024, arising from offences under Sections 147, 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had already reached an …
The petitioner, Rajesh Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the charge-sheet …
The appellant filed a withdrawal application (No.3 of 2026) seeking to withdraw the pending appeal. The court heard counsel J.P.S. Chauhan for the appellant. The application was allowed, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the original dispute were …
The petitioner, Smt. Sunita Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed. The Court observed that …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted that, while the charge sheet …
The revisionists sought enhancement of the maintenance awarded by the Family Court under Section 125 Cr.P.C., arguing that the respondent‑defendant earned Rs 1,00,000 per month and that maintenance should have been payable from the date of the original application. The Family Court had fixed …
The petitioners, Dinesh Tyagi alias Guddu and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 44289 of 2024) on the ground that they had reached an amicable compromise with the State. The State did not oppose the compromise and agreed that the parties could approach the trial …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vikas Patel, who was arrested in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The …
The petitioners, Ramjan Ali and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had …
Petitioner Rajendra filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 1879 of 2022 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel was absent and no interim relief had been obtained. The Court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time (eflux of time). …
Mohd Usman (revisionist) filed a criminal revision under Section 126(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging an order of the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Moradabad, which upheld a Section 125 CrPC maintenance order directing him to pay Rs.20,000 per month to the opposite party …
The applicant, Dilshad Ahmad, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 3096 of 2017) arising from offences under Sections 376, 493, 504, 506 and 323 IPC. He argued that the victim’s statements under Sections 161 and 164 CrPC did …
Ashish Kumar Dixit filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. No representative of the applicant appeared before the court, and the appointed senior counsel, Mr. Satyvrat Tripathi, was also absent. The court noted the absence of any party or counsel to argue the …
The appellant, Nathan Singh Principal Tyagi Inter College, filed a special appeal (No. 1397 of 2013) before the Allahabad High Court. No representative appeared for the appellant even after a revised call. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal on the ground of want of prosecution. The judges, …
The applicants, Pyar Mohammad @ Aliyas and Hakikat, were charged under Sections 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly opening fire on a police party, although no police officer was injured. They have a criminal history of more than ten cases, most of …
The applicant, Gajendra Yadav, filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash a criminal proceeding arising from a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act concerning a Rs.14‑lakh cheque that was dishonoured. He alleged that the cheque was lost, that no liability existed, …
The petitioner, Gyanwati, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The learned Additional Government Advocate informed the bench of this …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside an order dated 23 February 2022 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, which had allowed a criminal revision filed by the opposite party against an order of attachment of land made by the …
The mother of the deceased Kiran Raikwar filed a petition seeking release of Rs 16 lakh deposited by the State under Section 13‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act as part of a mutual‑consent divorce settlement. The wife had died before receiving the amount, and the mother claimed entitlement as the legal …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained a criminal revision filed by a juvenile (X) seeking to quash the denial of bail by the Children Court/Special Judge under the POCSO Act and the Juvenile Justice Board. The revisionist argued that the juvenile, who was in custody since June 2025, had no …
The applicant, Khalid, deposited Rs.2,00,000 as bail surety and later furnished fresh sureties and a personal bond as ordered by the court. He applied to the trial court for release of the deposited amount, but the application was rejected on the ground that the case had been committed to the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Jitendra @ Jeetu, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that …
The petitioners, Union of India and four others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The court examined this submission and found no merit in continuing the petition. …
Kunwar Pal Singh, a constable of the Uttar Pradesh Police, was alleged to have been intoxicated while on duty in 2011 and, as a result, a bullet from his service rifle injured two civilians. A criminal FIR was lodged and he was later tried under IPC sections 286 and 338, where he was acquitted. The …
The State filed a criminal complaint (CC No. 5390 of 2022) alleging offences under Sections 500, 501 and 384 IPC arising from a land‑mutation dispute. The civil judge, however, issued a summoning order on 10‑11‑2022 charging the four applicants with offences under Sections 420, 468 and 471 IPC, …
The revisionist, Sanjiv Kumar Kanaujiya, filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order dated 16 September 2019 that directed him to appear before the court, but he failed to comply. The revision was filed after a delay of 2,251 days, and the revisionist sought condonation of this delay. …
Ashu Jain, a clerk in a district court advocate's office, was charged under Section 318(4) of the Indian Penal Code (420 IPC) and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act for allegedly using fake documents to file bail bonds. He has seven prior criminal cases, all of which are old and he is presently out …
The petitioner, Narendra Singh Gangwar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to expedite the decision in case No. 7973 of 2023 (Gram Samaj, Khanpur vs Pramod Kumar, Khanali) under section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the delay in …
The applicants filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash a summoning order dated 22‑12‑2015 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Baghpat in a dowry‑related complaint (Smt. Seema v. Monu). They alleged that the prosecution was malicious, that no offence under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Upendra Kumar Mishra, accused in Crime No. 209 of 2024 under IPC sections 302, 392 and 411. The FIR did not name the applicant and alleged that unknown persons committed the murder and robbery. Evidence consisted of CCTV footage showing …
Vibhore Kumar Rastogi filed a criminal revision challenging a judgment of the Judicial Magistrate dated 10 September 2025 under Section 23 of the Domestic Violence Act. The revisionist sought condonation of a 70‑day delay in filing the revision and later requested to withdraw the revision in favour …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 27‑04‑2010 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 15‑05‑2010 in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 …
Surjeet Varma filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 25‑11‑2021 in a case where he was charged under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. The applicant argued, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club (2024) 10 SCC 690, …
The applicants filed an application under the inherent powers of the High Court to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The civil court had verified a compromise between the …
The applicant, Anil, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 592 of 2025) filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that he is neither a gang member nor a leader and that in the two related base cases shown in the gang chart, as …
The applicant, Ranveer Singh, filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 16‑01‑2020 in State v Ranveer Singh, which alleged offences under IPC Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating). The applicant argued that, based …
The High Court considered a criminal revision filed by a 17‑year‑old juvenile seeking bail after orders of the Juvenile Court and Juvenile Justice Board denied it. The applicant argued that he had no criminal history, the DPO report raised no specific objections, and he had been confined for an …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by 18‑year‑old Aryan Verma, accused under IPC sections 115(2) and 351(2), section 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. Act and sections 5(l) and 6 of the POCSO Act for an alleged sexual offence involving a 14‑year‑old girl. The applicant contended that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramgopal @ Bhavval, who was charged under IPC sections 103(1), 309(6), 317(2) and Section 3 of the Arms Act in a case registered as Crime No. 0231 of 2024. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that CCTV footage was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 23883 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 452, 323, 325 and 506 IPC. Both the applicants and the opposite parties jointly submitted that a compromise had been reached and was …
The revisionists sought to set aside an order that had rejected their application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, arguing that the suit was barred by limitation and by Order II Rule 2 CPC. The respondents contended that the earlier ex‑parte decree and sale deed were not binding on them and that the …
The petitioner, Anees Ahmad, vacated government premises and challenged the respondents' calculation of a penal rent amounting to approximately Rs. 11 lakh. The petitioner objected to the calculation but did not provide detailed particulars. The High Court observed that the two writ petitions filed …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 01‑02‑2023, the cognizance and summoning order dated 22‑10‑2024, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 907 of 2024 (State vs. Susheela Devi @ Kazri and others) relating to …
The applicant, Adil, sought bail in a murder case (Crime No. 393 of 2024) under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed he was falsely implicated and that no incriminating material existed against him. The prosecution presented eye‑witness statements, CCTV footage showing Adil …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anas, accused in Crime No. 666 of 2025 under several sections of the BNS and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant claimed that the alleged firearm injury to the victim, Sartaj, was actually caused by a hard blunt object, as …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kunal, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the case involved cross‑reported FIRs, making it …
The revisionist filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order dated 18.08.2025 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Ghazipur, under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The revision was filed 85 days late, and a delay condonation application was made. The …
Suresh Kumar Bharti, a law officer in the Varanasi Development Authority, challenged a disciplinary order that stopped two salary increments, alleging that the procedure violated principles of natural justice under the Uttar Pradesh Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999. The …
The applicant, Ramu Chauhan, was charged under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act sections 5 and 6 for offences arising from a 2021 crime. He filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the entire Sessions case, asserting that he had married the victim on 6 May 2022, …
The applicant, Tej Pratap Rai, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.11188 of 2025) for an alleged rape under Section 376 IPC. He argued that the FIR was lodged more than a year after the incident, that the victim had …
The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay in filing a review petition against the State of U.P. The court found the reasons for delay bona fide and beyond the applicant's control, and therefore allowed the condonation application. The applicant, however, …
Petitioner Raj Singh filed a habeas corpus petition seeking the release of his wife Meena, who was in the legal custody of police officers. Meena appeared in court and stated that she voluntarily lives with her father because she fears her husband due to alleged assault and does not wish to reside …
The petitioner, Mobin Khan, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to appoint a new Booth Level Officer (BLO) at Village Panchayat Mewa Sharfapur to prepare a clean voter list following a revenue inspector's report. The petition was based on a complaint alleging irregularities …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State Information Commission to decide his RTI appeal filed on 30 September 2025 under Section 19(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. The appeal remained pending beyond the statutory period of 30 days, extendable to 45 days, as …
The petition filed by Anees Ahmad against the State of U.P. and three others was heard before Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery of the Allahabad High Court. The petition was disposed of, with the Court directing that the orders be found in Writ Petition No.2164 of 2026. No substantive findings on …
Petitioners Suraj Kumar and another filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that the corpus, Priyanka Kesarwani, was being illegally detained by respondent Ashish Kumar Kesarwani. The court conducted a video interview with the corpus, who affirmed that she was residing voluntarily with the …
Smt. Prem Lata filed a revision application (S.C.C. Revision No. 184 of 2022) before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the lower court against Babu Sonkar and four others. The revisionist's counsel, Saurabh Kumar Pandey, appeared, but the opposite party's counsel, Shashi Kant …
The applicants, Indra Pal and three others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief from pending criminal proceedings. The High Court examined whether it could exercise its inherent powers to quash the proceedings. Relying on the precedent set in Smt. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a Special Sessions Trial for offences under Sections 64(1) and 115(2) of the BNSS and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. They asserted that the accused (applicant No.1) had married the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sohail (alias Suhan) under Sections 20 and 60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act in connection with the recovery of more than 74 kg of ganja from a vehicle in which he and his wife were seated. The applicant contended …
The applicant, Ajay Chauhan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 29‑11‑2023, the summoning order dated 18‑12‑2023, and the entire criminal proceedings (Session Trial No.1159 of 2023) relating to offences under Sections …
The petitioner, Anand, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking the expeditious disposal of Civil Suit No. 383 of 2011 pending before the Civil Court, Chandauli. The petition highlighted that the suit had been pending for more than 15 years and there was prior confusion …
The applicant, Manish, sought bail in a case under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act where 1.06 kg of charas was allegedly recovered from his possession. He contended that the recovery was false, that procedural safeguards under Sections 50 and 52 were not followed, and that his prior criminal …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25‑10‑2019, the cognizance and summoning order dated 04‑12‑2019, and the entire criminal proceedings of Session Trial No.702 of 2022 relating to offences under Sections 452, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25‑09‑2013 and the cognizance order dated 12‑03‑2014 in Criminal Case No.126 of 2014, which involved offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 and 427 IPC. Both parties …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25‑09‑2013 and the cognizance order dated 12‑03‑2014 in Criminal Case No. 127 of 2014 (State vs Laxmi Kant Mishra et al.) arising from offences under IPC sections 323, 427, 351 …
The High Court considered a criminal revision filed by Juvenile S, a 16‑year‑old accused under the POCSO Act, seeking to quash the bail denial order of the Special Judge and the Juvenile Justice Board. The revisionist argued that the juvenile was falsely implicated, had no criminal history, the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rishabh Chaurasiya, who is the brother‑in‑law of the FIR complainant. The FIR originally contained charges of dowry harassment but no rape allegation; however, during investigation the complainant recorded statements alleging rape. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raghvendra Pratap Singh alias Ghuran Singh in a case (Crime No.235 of 2025) involving alleged firing on a police party under Section 109 of the BNS Act and Sections 3, 7, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, which correspond to Section 307 of the IPC. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Indrapal Urf Nidha, who was arrested in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, had …
The appellant, Anjana Verma and another, filed a withdrawal application (No.2 of 2026) in the Second Appeal No. 552 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court. The application sought to withdraw the pending appeal against the respondents, Narpendra Kumar Verma and another. Counsel for the appellant, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Anoop Yadav, who was charged under multiple sections of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted that he was …
The accused, Chutku, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 254/2025) under Section 109(1) of the B.N.S. for alleged involvement in causing grievous injuries. The applicant claimed false implication, highlighted lack of prior criminal record, and noted that co-accused had already been …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Amit Gurung, who was arrested in a Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) case (Sections 8, 22, 23) for allegedly possessing small quantities of Diazepam, …
Smt. Divyanshi and another filed a civil contempt application (No. 1633 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court against Shri Prabhu Dayal Pandey, Principal Judge of the Family Court. The applicant alleged that the respondent had failed to comply with an order of the writ court. Counsel for the …
The appellant, Smt Salini Jain, filed an application seeking to withdraw the appeal filed against Sachin Jain. The application was supported by an affidavit explaining the desire to withdraw. The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad considered the request and found no objection to the withdrawal. …
M/s Jitco Overses Private Limited filed an application under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve its dispute with the Union of India and others. The court examined the consent of former Allahabad High Court Judge Justice …
The applicant, Shubham, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 413 of 2025) under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that although he is named as an accused in the present matter and three other base cases shown in a …
The applicant, Deepanshu Mittal, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS (2023) seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 253 of 2026) arising from Crime No. 693 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 75, 77, 352, 351(2) of the BNS and Sections 66E & 67 of the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitish Kumar Singh @ Mohan Singh, who was charged under Section 109(2) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly opening fire on police during an encounter, though no police officer was injured. The applicant claimed false implication and that he …
The applicant Sumit filed a second bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 28707 of 2023) after his first bail plea was rejected on merits on 24 February 2023. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant for the second hearing, while the learned Additional Government Advocate …
The applicant, Deepak Badkareya Khatik, filed a bail application in a case under Sections 2(kha)(1) and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities Act, 1986. He argued that he is not a gang member or leader, has no criminal history apart from two prior cases where he was already released on …
The applicant, Mohammad Zafar, was arrested in a case under Sections 4 and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, for alleged involvement in illegal sex trade. He contended that the allegations were false, that the guest house where girls were rescued belonged to co‑accused Anil Kumar …
Jageshwar Singh filed a civil contempt application (No. 1640 of 2026) against Sri Shyam Narayan and another. The applicant was represented by counsel Radhey Shyam Yadav. The Chief Standing Counsel placed on record that a First Information Report (FIR No. 0042 of 2026) had been lodged on 31 March …
Petitioner Farhan Qureshi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 20.01.2026 under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, alleging that he is a prospective accused though not named in the FIR. The State argued that the petition was not maintainable because the …
Petitioners Sanjeev Kumar and seven others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 10‑02‑2026 that alleged offences under several IPC sections. During the hearing, the petitioners withdrew their challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that any bail …
Petitioners Ram Bharosi and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 29.01.2026 lodged by the widow daughter‑in‑law of petitioner‑1 under sections 329(3), 329(4), 324(4) and 351(4) of the B.N.S. The petitioners later withdrew the challenge to the FIR and …
Petitioners Sindhu Kumari and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 21‑02‑2026 under Section 87. After hearing, the petitioners voluntarily withdrew the relief sought but requested that the writ be disposed with a direction to the lower court to consider their …
The applicant, Ishrak @ Kale Khan, sought bail in a case filed under Sections 3(1) and 2(b)(xvii) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that he is neither a gang member nor a leader and that the sole case linking him to a gang is isolated, while his other …
The petitioners, Smt Shaloni and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others not to harass or interfere with their peaceful marital life. It was admitted that petitioner No.1 was in a live-in relationship with petitioner No.2, without any decree of …
Petitioner Jaheer Alam filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police (respondent No.2) to conduct an inquiry under Section 173(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code concerning an incident dated 24‑04‑2025 and to consider a representation dated 22‑09‑2025. The Court …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ibrahim Ansari, who was charged under Sections 8, 15(C), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act in a case where more than 12 quintals of poppy were recovered from the cement store of co‑accused Amarpal Singh. The prosecution’s case against Ansari rests solely …
Prashant Kumar Agrawal filed a contempt application against Civil Judge (Senior Division) Aman Kumar Srivastava, alleging non‑compliance with a writ court order. The High Court examined the instructions dated 26 March 2026 issued by the Civil Judge, which indicated that the proceedings were being …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ankit, who was accused under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 352 and a provision of the Bombay Narcotic Substances Act in a case pending before the trial court. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR, and that …
Petitioners Parwati Prajapati and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 22‑02‑2026 lodged by a third‑party informant under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several IPC provisions. The State argued that an earlier FIR dated 03‑02‑2026 had …
Manoj Kumar Yadav, an Inspector in the Railway Protection Force, was arrested after being caught red‑handed taking a bribe and an FIR was filed under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. A disciplinary enquiry was simultaneously initiated against him for the same allegations, and he …
The petitioners Jangali @ Bhakudi and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Sant Ram Nigam, Nitin Dwivedi, Rama Kant Yadav and Vivek Kumar Yadav, were listed in the cause list but failed to appear at the hearing, even after a …
The petitioners, Ram Milan Vishwakarma and three others, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 5541 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Amresh Kumar and Shashi Ranjan Srivastava, were listed in the cause list but failed to appear to press the petition. The respondents, …
The applicant Abhimanyu Shukla filed a civil contempt application (No. 1663 of 2026) against Jogendra Kumar, Commissioner of Police, alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. The applicant’s counsel, Abhishek Tiwari and Anil Kumar Shukla, informed the bench that the writ order had been fully …
Petitioners Abhishek Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 28‑01‑2026 and the subsequent charge sheet filed under various provisions of the B.N.S. and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The State argued …
The petitioners, Mahi and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel – Adwitiya Prakash Tiwari, Amit Singh and Anshuman Singh – were listed in the cause list but failed to appear even on the revised call. The State’s counsel, G.A., was …
The petitioners, Ruby and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 04‑12‑2025 lodged by Smt. Nesha under Sections 137(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. The State, through the Attorney General, argued that the petition lacked any allegation about the petitioners' income …
Petitioners Rakesh Kumar Mishra and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 27.01.2026 registered under Sections 351(2), 352 and 333 of the BNSS. The State, represented by the Attorney General, submitted that the investigation was completed and a charge‑sheet …
Petitioner Rajkumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 08-10-2025 registered under Sections 115, 351(3) and 352 of the BNSS. The State, through the Advocate General, informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been filed under …
Petitioner Suresh Kushwaha filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 24‑11‑2025 registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the petitioner withdrew his challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the lower court decide his …
Petitioners Shivesh alias Bholu Pandey and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 27‑02‑2026 that alleged offences under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and later added section 117(2), as well as Section 67 of the Income‑Tax Act. After arguments, the …
Petitioner Bheem Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR dated 11‑04‑2024 under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The State argued that the petition was filed more than two years after the FIR, constituting an inordinate delay and invoking the …
Petitioners Wakil Singh Kushwaha and two others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to reduce the restoration period for the commuted portion of their pension from fifteen years to about eleven years and to stop any further deduction of that amount after the shorter period. …
