Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 13601–13800
The applicant, Shitla Prasad Singh, was arrested in connection with FIR No. 489 of 2025 alleging assault with a 'Balli' against six persons, including him, under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 191(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. He claimed he was falsely implicated due to a property dispute with the informant, …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Krishna Bhati, who is accused in crime no. 507 of 2025 under Sections 109(1), 131, 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S. for alleged assault with intent to kill. Bhati’s counsel argued that he is innocent, that no incriminating …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunil Yadav, accused under IPC Sections 109(1), 352 and 118(1) for allegedly stabbing a victim. The applicant claimed innocence, citing a three‑day delay in filing the FIR, contradictions between the FIR, the victim’s statement and witness …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jitendra Yadav, who was alleged to have conspired in forging an identity card and executing a fraudulent sale deed. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that no credible evidence linked him to the offences and that the actual perpetrator had …
The applicant, Suneel Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the order of the Additional Sessions Judge dated 04‑09‑2025, which had dismissed his discharge application under Section 250 BNSS. He alleged that the FIR was lodged after an unexplained delay, that the …
The applicant, Lallu, sought enlargement of bail in a criminal trial (Crime No. 228 of 2025) involving charges under Sections 109(1), 110, 191(2), 191(3), 115(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. He claimed innocence, stating that his name was added only during investigation and that no incriminating material …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Alok Shukla under Sections 2 and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in Crime No. 339 of 2024. The applicant argued that the investigation was complete, the charge sheet had been filed, and no …
The writ court ordered the opposite party, an executive engineer of a electricity distribution company, to correct an electricity bill dated 12‑12‑2023. The opposite party filed a compliance affidavit on 5‑May‑2025 stating that the corrected bill had been issued and attached the corrected bill and …
The complainant, a NREGA worker, alleged that the village Pradhan Rameshwar Singh and four others assaulted him with lathis, axes and a firearm after refusing to pay pending wages, also using caste slurs. The trial court convicted the five accused under IPC sections 147, 148, 323, 325 and 452 and …
The appellant Saleem was convicted by a Special Sessions Court under Sections 21 and 22 of the NDPS Act for possession of 580 grams of Alprazolam, receiving ten years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1,00,000 with an additional six‑month term for default of fine. He appealed, contending that …
The applicants Amit @ Amardeep and another filed a petition under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 1 July 2025, the cognizance/summoning order dated 15 December 2025 and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 51215 of 2025) pending before the …
Petitioner Prabha Shanker Selot filed a writ petition against Bank of Baroda and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the case. The respondents had filed a counter‑affidavit but the petitioner did not file a rejoinder. The court …
The appellant Pepil was convicted by the Fast Track Court in Moradabad under Sections 498-A and 304-B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, receiving sentences of two years, seven years and one year respectively along with fines. An appeal was filed challenging the …
Vimal Singh filed a writ petition seeking admission to Class VI of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Duredi, Banda, asserting that his birth certificate issued by the Gram Panchayat records his date of birth as 01‑07‑2013, which falls within the eligibility window. The school denied admission relying on a …
The applicant, Mahendra Maurya, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 5663 of 2024) arising from offences under Sections 419 and 420 IPC. During hearing, the applicant limited his request to obtaining permission to file a discharge …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Praveen Kumar Katariya under Section 483 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of the IPC, relating to alleged fraudulent investment schemes involving NFC coins. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the …
Golu Pandey was arrested in connection with FIR No. 296 of 2025 alleging assault and related offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 109 of the B.N.S. He applied for bail, claiming he was falsely implicated, that the FIR named him only as an unknown person, and that no …
The applicant, Pankak Kumar Mishra, filed an application under Section 430(2) of the B.N.S.S. seeking suspension of his sentence and bail while a criminal appeal (No.125 of 2025) is pending before the Sessions Judge, Bareilly. He contended that he is innocent, the conviction is against the weight of …
The appellant, Smt. Radha Rani, filed a second appeal before the Allahabad High Court. The court issued a notice on 9 February 2026 directing the appellant to engage new counsel. Despite this, the postal department returned the notice as undeliverable on 8 April 2026. No counsel appeared on behalf …
The appellant, Kagaz Udyog Sahkari Samiti Ltd., filed a second appeal before the Allahabad High Court. The court issued a notice on 9 January 2026 directing the appellant to engage another counsel. Subsequently, a report dated 16 January 2026 indicated that the sole appellant had left without an …
The High Court, acting on its order dated 10‑02‑2026, issued a notice to the appellant to engage new counsel. The notice was sent by registered post but the service report dated 08‑04‑2026 indicated that the notice was returned as "deceased". No counsel or party appeared before the Court for either …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Praveen Jain, who is accused under Sections 8, 21 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for allegedly possessing 202 gm of various scheduled drugs. Jain contended that he was falsely implicated, that no drugs were …
The petitioners, Nazim and three others, challenged orders summoning them under Section 190(1)(b) of the CrPC after multiple police closure reports concluded the allegations were false. They argued that the informant’s statements were unreliable, the medical evidence cast doubt on a firearm injury, …
Shivam, accused in Crime No.516 of 2026 for offences under the Indian Penal Code, the B.N.S. Act and Sections 5/6 of the POCSO Act, sought bail during the pendency of trial. He argued that a co‑accused, Ravi, with an identical role and no prior criminal record, had been granted bail, establishing …
Petitioner Murari filed a writ petition challenging two orders—one dated 23 September 2025 issued by the District Magistrate, Bareilly, and another dated 29 March 2025 issued by the Tehsildar (Sadar), Bareilly—on the ground that they were passed in violation of the procedural requirements laid down …
Hari Chand filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 19 July 2003 issued by the Chairman of Nagar Palika Parishad, Rampur, and related letters from the District Magistrate. The petitioner alleged that the orders would cause irreparable loss. The Court examined the pleadings …
The applicant, Vinod Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 33586 of 2022) before the Allahabad High Court seeking release from custody pending trial. The State of Uttar Pradesh opposed the bail. The court examined the application and, referencing a prior order in a similar bail …
The partnership firm ASJ Developers filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 alleging that Mount Litera Zee School issued a cheque of Rs 2,50,000 that was stopped and returned un‑encashed. The complainant was required to serve a statutory notice within thirty days …
The applicants sought quashing of the criminal proceedings arising from FIR No. 353 of 2015 (Sections 406 and 420 IPC) on the ground that the dispute was essentially civil, that there was no entrustment or dishonest intention, and that the directors could not be held vicariously liable without the …
The appellant was convicted by the trial court for attempting murder under Section 307 IPC and illegal possession of a firearm under Section 25 of the Arms Act, based on police testimony that he fired at a police party and was found with a country‑made pistol. The appellant appealed, arguing that no …
The applicant, Pankaj Singh, was arrested in connection with a 2006 assault case (Crime No. 20) involving multiple injuries to the victim, Ranvir Pratap Singh, and is seeking enlargement of bail during trial. The applicant claims he is innocent, falsely implicated due to village factional politics, …
The applicant, Brajkishore, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged assault on the informant's brothers and has been in custody since 21 November 2025. He claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed six days after the incident and that no specific role was assigned to him, …
The applicant, Shivam Vishnoi, filed an application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a Sessions Court order that had proceeded with his trial for offences under Sections 363, 302 and 201 IPC. He claimed he was falsely implicated due to a property dispute and asked the court to recall two …
The applicants filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 06‑12‑2016 and the proceedings in a rape‑and‑criminal‑intimidation case (Sections 376D, 506 IPC). They argued that the FIR was false, that the victim’s statement indicated she was living with another man, and …
Vinod Kumar, an accused in a large economic‑offence case involving alleged fraud under the Companies Act, RBI Act, Prize Chits Act and several IPC sections, has been in judicial custody since June 2019. The charge sheet has not yet been framed due to the non‑appearance of numerous co‑accused lodged …
The Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission appealed against Surabhi Ramesh Pandey and two others, contending that the original petitioners had failed to clear the examination and that the appeal had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The learned counsel for the Commission argued that …
The applicant, Subhash Rajbhar, filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to set aside a Special Judge's order dated 29‑03‑2025 in a case involving offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The applicant and the second opposite party (the victim) had reached an …
The appellant, Rambeer @ Bablu, appealed to the Allahabad High Court against the rejection of his bail application by a Special Judge under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The FIR stemmed from a single incident that gave rise to three …
The High Court considered the bail application of Dharmender Singh, who is charged under sections 420, 406, 504, 467, 468 and 471 IPC for allegedly cheating an informant in a property transaction. The applicant claimed the dispute was purely civil and that he had complied with earlier anticipatory …
The revisionist Rameshwar Pandey filed a criminal revision (No. 8972 of 2025) challenging an order dated 25‑09‑2025 of the Judicial Magistrate, Siddharth Nagar, which had allowed an application under section 175(3) of the BNSS to direct the police to register a FIR. The State raised a preliminary …
The appellant, C/M Waqf No. 318 Rampur, filed a first appeal before the Allahabad High Court against a decision of the U.P. Sunni Central Waqf Board. The appeal was listed for hearing, but the appellant failed to appear even after the case was called in the revised list. The court noted that no …
Kalika Prasad filed a writ petition (No. 18756 of 2019) challenging the High Court's order that released the landlord and dismissed the tenant's appeal. The petitioner failed to appear before the court even after a revised call. The court noted that factual findings had already been recorded in …
Petitioner Sabhajeet Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. The court had earlier issued an order on 22‑12‑2023 directing the petitioner to serve notice to private respondents. The petitioner’s counsel failed to comply with this direction, …
The appellant, Prasoon Singh, was arrested for alleged assault with lathi and danda, though he was not named in the FIR, and has been in custody since December 3, 2025. He filed a bail application under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, which …
Pradeep Kumar (Vikki) appealed to the Allahabad High Court against the dismissal of his bail application by a Special Judge under the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellant argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the bail denial was illegal. The …
Gyan Singh filed Writ‑A No. 36522 of 2011 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the Registrar of Co‑Operative Societies, Lucknow and other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel did not appear, while the State respondents were represented by standing counsel and counsel for …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of accused Ajeet Yadav, who was charged with offences including assault and grievous hurt. The applicant’s counsel argued that the FIR was false, that no specific role was …
The applicant, Shadab, was charged under IPC sections 109, 118(1), 115(2), 352 and 361(3) for allegedly assaulting three persons with a baton, causing head injuries. He sought bail, claiming innocence, a delayed FIR, lack of independent witnesses and no prior criminal record. The State argued that …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Raj, who was accused of kidnapping, assaulting, and selling a woman for Rs. 50,000, offences alleged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that no injury was …
The applicant, Lakhan Lal, was charged under Section 109 of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. for allegedly causing a gun‑shot injury to a 14‑year‑old boy during a marriage celebration. He claimed innocence, arguing that the injury resulted from celebratory firing and that the FIR was lodged fifteen days …
The petitioner, Mustaq Ahmad, owned a half share in a parcel of land (Khasra No.165/1) that the State of Uttar Pradesh took possession of on 18‑08‑2001 for a dam project, but no formal acquisition proceedings were undertaken and no compensation was paid. The State contended that the land was …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 20‑10‑2015, the cognizance order dated 25‑05‑2016, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No.1267 of 2016) for offences under Sections 147, 109, 295 and 504 IPC. The parties …
The appellant, Sharad Agarwal, filed a first appeal against the order dated 2026. The respondent raised a preliminary objection concerning the maintainability of the appeal. The appellant's counsel indicated a willingness to withdraw the appeal and seek alternative remedies. The court accepted the …
Amit Kumar filed a criminal revision challenging a family court order dated 25.02.2026 that imposed a cost of Rs. 25,000 on him under section 126(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. He sought a partial setting aside of the order and a stay of the cost pending the revision, alleging irreparable loss. …
The applicant, Sumit Kumar Singh, the registered owner of a Swift Desire car seized during the investigation of a murder case, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking the release of the vehicle. The trial court rejected his request, citing the pending recording of a witness …
The applicant Saurabh, charged under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 352 of the B.N.S. and Sections 5M(L)/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual abuse of a 12‑year‑old boy, applied for enlargement of bail during trial. He claimed innocence, asserted that he was falsely implicated due to enmity, and …
The appellants, Babloo Singh and two others, filed a criminal appeal challenging a complaint lodged against them under Sections 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha) and 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act, along with several IPC offences. The complaint alleged that an incident occurred on 20‑07‑2023 inside the house of the …
The applicant, Narinder Singh Chauhan, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS and Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet and summons issued against him in a cyber‑extortion case. The FIR, lodged by Glenda Roleen Fernandes, detailed a scheme involving …
The Allahabad High Court entertained a special appeal filed by the Committee of Management, Madhav Vidya Mandir Inter College, challenging a Single Judge's order that dismissed their writ petition concerning the election of a manager. The appellants argued that the Regional Level Committee (RLC) had …
The applicants, Ravindra Kumar and his son Asmit Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act and Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 940 of 2025 arising from FIR 09/2025 under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities …
The applicants Arvind Kumar Dwivedi, Anjali Kumari and Anand Kumar filed an application under Section 528 BNSS and Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and summons issued in a case under the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. They argued that the …
The applicant, Aslam Khan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a stay of the trial in Session Trial No.66/2024, which involved charges under Sections 498‑A, 302/34, 304‑B, 323/34, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He alleged that no …
The writ petition (WRIT-C No. 22877 of 2016) filed by Aman Ullah against the State of Uttar Pradesh was listed before the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and there was no request for adjournment or any other relief. The court noted the …
Ram Baran filed writ petition No. 6376 of 1979 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against D.D.C. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and no request for adjournment was filed. The respondents were represented by counsel. The court observed the petitioner’s failure …
The appellants appealed their conviction and sentences under Sections 304 and 323 IPC, arguing that the trial record was lost and could not be reconstructed. The High Court examined the provisions of Sections 384, 385 and 386 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which require perusal of the record before …
The appeal filed by Jagdish, Pratap and Tirath against the State of U.P. was considered by the Allahabad High Court. An official report confirmed that appellant No. 3, Tirath, died on 20 February 2025. The court noted that the appeal against appellants No. 1 and No. 2 (Jagdish and Pratap) had …
Mool Chand was convicted by the Sessions Court for attempting murder under Section 307 IPC after firing a gun at Kewal Singh, causing injuries to his ear and back. The appellant appealed, contending that the injury was not grievous and that he could only be liable under Section 324 IPC for causing …
Ram Baran filed Writ Petition No. 2323 of 1984 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against D.D.C. and others. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and no request for adjournment was filed. The respondent's counsel, Dhiraj Srivastava, was …
The appeal challenged the conviction of six accused under IPC sections 323, 147 and 452, of which only two appellants (Indra Pal and Surendra alias Sunder) remained alive. The trial court sentenced them to six months, one year and two years of rigorous imprisonment respectively but failed to …
Lokendra (appellant) filed a first appeal against Order Defective No. 602 of 2009. The matter was listed on a revised list but no counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant. Counsel for the respondents was present before the court. The bench observed that the appeal could not be proceeded with due …
The applicants had purchased 210 eucalyptus trees through a railway tender and paid Rs.14.40 lakh. While collecting the trees on 9 November 2016, they were arrested by Railway Police and an FIR (Case Crime No.03 of 2016) was lodged under the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966. The FIR …
The applicant, a juvenile, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the cognizance and charge sheet issued by the Juvenile Justice Board in a POCSO case. The FIR was lodged against unknown persons, and the prosecutrix initially gave a statement under Section 180 that …
The applicant, Rajesh alias Nirhu, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 142, 64(1) of the IPC, Section 70 of the Evidence Act and Sections 5(g) and 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication in a gang‑rape allegation. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the victim …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Sachin Kumar, who was arrested in connection with offences under IPC Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and Section 66‑D of the IT Act. The applicant claimed …
The revisionist, a minor, challenged the order of the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) that transferred his case to a Children’s Court for trial as an adult under Sections 15 and 18(3) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. He argued that his age at the time of the alleged …
The appellants challenged the prosecution's case, arguing that the FIR of 29‑09‑2023 specifically implicated only appellant No.1 for assault, while the other accused were mentioned vaguely without distinct allegations. They contended that proceeding against appellants No.2 and No.3 under the IPC and …
The applicant Ankit filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court's inherent powers. The court noted that service of notice on the second opposite party was still pending. It directed the office to issue a reminder to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, …
Ankit Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a compassionate appointment under the U.P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974, based on an order dated 04.07.2018. This was his second petition on the same cause; the first petition (Writ Petition …
The appellant Jhunni Lal was convicted by a Special Judge for dacoity under Section 395 IPC and sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment. The prosecution alleged that a group of eight to ten miscreants, including the appellant, looted a house and assaulted its occupants, but only two persons …
The appellants were convicted by a Special Judge under IPC sections 323, 34, 504, 506 and Section 3(1)(10) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for assaulting a Chamar victim in 2002. The trial court sentenced them to rigorous imprisonment of one to three years and imposed fines. The …
The appellants Shishupal and two others were convicted by a Special Judge under IPC sections 323/34, 504, 506 and Section 3(1)(10) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for assaulting a Dalit complainant and using caste slurs. They were sentenced to rigorous imprisonment with fines, all …
The appellants Raju, Sunny and Satish were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Saharanpur, under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (363, 366, 368, 323, 376(2)(G), 328, 315 and 120‑B) and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment with fines, the sentences to run concurrently. They filed a …
The petitioner, Sarni, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. No counsel or party appeared before the court on the scheduled date. The judges noted the absence of any appearance and consequently ordered that …
The applicants, Puneet Kishore and Saroj Gupta, filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to enforce a Supreme Court order dated 03‑08‑2001 in Transfer Petition (C) No.260 of 2000, which had resulted in a compromise and a divorce decree, and to stay a criminal case (Case No. 417 of 2021) under …
The petitioner, Rahul Chauhan, was appointed to a short‑term vacancy in 1995 and his request for regularisation was denied. He contended that he should benefit from a Government Order dated 04‑Oct‑2024, issued pursuant to the Supreme Court’s judgment in Vinod Kumar Srivastava v. State of U.P. …
The applicant Satish Mishra filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 37882 of 2024) before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, seeking release from custody in a case instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter was listed before Justice Gautam Chowdhary. Counsel for the …
Ramendra Kumar Tiwari filed a writ petition (No. 4490 of 2004) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. The petition was listed but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. Consequently, the Court noted the absence of prosecution. The Court dismissed the writ …
Avinash Misra filed Writ Petition No. 6628 of 2004 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. through the Secretary of Education. The petitioner failed to appear at the hearing while the respondent's counsel was present. The court observed that the petition had become …
The petitioner, Rajesh Dhar Dwivedi, filed Writ A No. 1048 of 2010 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition for want …
The applicants, led by Ajay Kumar, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 27‑01‑2017 and the entire criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 5070 of 2016) involving offences under Sections 147, 452, 323/149, 504 and 506 of the IPC. …
The applicant, Nikit @ Aditya, filed a third bail application before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Parvish Kumar, informed the court that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the bail request and sought to have the application withdrawn. The State, represented by the learned …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Manish, accused in a case involving multiple IPC offences including murder and assault. The applicant argued that the FIR and witness statements were vague, the third statement of the first informant was unreliable, and that he suffers …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 22.03.2022, the cognizance and summoning order dated 20.06.2023, and the entire proceedings in Case No.17910 of 2023 relating to offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. …
The Allahabad High Court restored a habeas corpus petition filed by the mother, Smt. Swati Bhartiya, seeking custody of her minor children Yuvaraj and Ayushman after a special appeal overturned an earlier order that had justified the father's transfer of custody to his sister and her husband. The …
The appellant, a juvenile aged 17 years 6 months at the time of the alleged offences, appealed the denial of bail under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. The High Court examined whether the lower court had correctly applied the statutory presumption in …
The appellant challenged the Sessions Judge's acquittal of the accused on sections 325 and 308 of the IPC, arguing that the medical evidence established a fracture caused by the assault. The trial court had found the fracture could not be linked to the incident because the X‑ray showed plates and …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief in a matter that has been pending since 2021. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, although the Additional Government Advocate and counsel for the complainant were present. The Court …
The applicants, Gopal Dixit and others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking revision of an earlier order. The matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, but no settlement was reached. Neither party appeared for further proceedings, …
The petition filed by D.B. Upadhyaya, successor to the original owners of several plots in Haraiya village, challenged objections raised by respondents under the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953. The respondents claimed adhivasi and sirdar rights based on revenue entries showing …
Beenu Mishra filed Transfer Application (Civil) No. 15 of 2026 seeking the transfer of a suit against Amit Kumar Shukla. The matter was listed before Hon'ble Justice Yogendra Kumar Srivastava. The court disposed of the application, making reference to an earlier order in Transfer Application (Civil) …
Durga Charan and another filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 01.07.2025 that dismissed their application filed under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioners contended that the order was liable to be challenged before the High Court. The respondents, the State of U.P. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 1341 of 2006) filed under Sections 395 and 397 IPC. They alleged that the dispute with the opposite party had been settled by compromise, a copy of which was annexed to the …
The petitioners, former armed forces personnel, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging a September 19, 2025 order of the Armed Forces Tribunal (Principal Bench, New Delhi) that dismissed their Original Applications under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 …
Santoshi Prajapti filed a transfer application (Civil) No.130 of 2026 seeking to have the suit transferred to another court. The opposite party, Shivsagar Prajapati, did not file a response. The court referred to an earlier order in Transfer Application (Civil) No.1061 of 2025 (Smt. Shivani Shankar …
Smt. Shweta Singh filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 138 of 2026 against Praveen Singh. The matter was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Yogendra Kumar Srivastava of the Allahabad High Court. The court disposed of the application, directing that the order dated in Transfer Application (Civil) …
The petition challenged a Central Administrative Tribunal order that allowed a retired Assistant Accounts Officer to claim a Composite Transfer Grant (CTG) of Rs. 91,246 as Travelling Allowance (TA) for moving to his declared home town of Khaga, Fatehpur. The petitioners argued that the respondent …
Javed Malik applied for enlargement of bail in a case pending before the Sessions Court where he was charged under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC for alleged involvement in a fictitious GST‑evading firm. The trial court had rejected his bail and he had been in custody since December 2025. …
The petitioner, Bhanu Pratap Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was found to be not pressed, i.e., lacking sufficient grounds or substantive averments. Counsel for the petitioner, Varad Nath, requested that the petition be dismissed and that the petitioner be …
The petitioner, Shiv Narain Singh, was appointed as Shiksha Mitra in 2005 but his appointment was later cancelled by a 2020 judgment. He argued that the experience he gained during his tenure should be counted for bonus marks in the selection for Assistant Teacher vacancies. The Division Bench had …
Paras Nath Rawat, a former sweeper, retired on 31-10-2022 and later had Rs.2,94,000 deducted from his post‑retirement benefits after the authorities corrected his pay‑scale and deemed the amount an excess payment. The State argued that the deduction was justified because the pay‑scale error had been …
The applicant, Karan Kumar, sought bail in a criminal case involving alleged posting of indecent photographs and a video of a consenting victim on Instagram, charged under sections of the BNS, Income Tax Act and POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, citing the victim's statement of consent and …
The applicant, Shashikant Ahirwar, was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence in Jalaun. The victim, a girl of about 16 years, testified that she had consented to the relationship, having accompanied the applicant from …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rizwan, who is charged under multiple provisions of the POCSO Act and the Uttar Pradesh Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021. Rizwan has been in custody since September 1, 2024 and seeks bail on the ground of parity with a co‑accused, …
Nagar Nigam Meerut filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petition was initially set for dismissal with exemplary costs, but the petitioner was granted time to seek further instructions. Subsequent adjournments were sought, but the petitioner failed …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay Patel, who was accused of attempting to rape a woman on 15 March 2025, with allegations that he bit the victim's face. The prosecution relied on a medical report confirming the injury, while the defense argued that the FIR was lodged twelve …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Dheeraj alias Boby in Criminal Case No. 0129 of 2025, which alleged offences under sections 64(1), 123, 87, 61(2), 351(2) and 352 of the BNS. The victim, a 22‑year‑old woman, claimed the accused spiked her drink during a trip to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bitanu @ Neeraj Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a case registered as Crime No. 69 of 2025 under Sections 65(1), 352, 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dinesh, who was arrested on 24‑04‑2025 in connection with a case (Crime No.06 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 64, 61, 87 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act and Sections 9 and 10 of the …
Mukesh Sahni applied for bail in a criminal case involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 5L and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS indicated consent, as she had accompanied the applicant to Gujarat and solemnised …
Vishal was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 280 of 2024) involving offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376, 323, 506, 427 and POCSO Act sections 5 and 6. He applied for bail, claiming he is innocent, has no criminal record, and that the alleged victim is a consenting adult who lives …
The petitioner, Amvarwati, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The Court on 28 July 2025 ordered the petitioner to deposit Rs. 2,00,000 with the respondent bank and to produce proof of receipt by 20 August 2025. The petitioner sought adjournments, which were granted on 26 August …
The applicant, Sumit Alias Hau, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 193 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 65(1), 74, 351(2) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 7(2) of the POCSO Act. Counsel for the applicant argued that he was innocent, the FIR was lodged six days after the alleged …
The applicant, Hashim, was arrested in a case under Sections 69, 115(2) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly entering into a corporeal relationship with a woman on a false promise of marriage and later refusing to marry her. The applicant contended that he was already married to the woman, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nikhil Prasad, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 115(2), 64, 351(3) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence at Kaptanganj, Kushinagar. The victim, aged about 20, gave a statement under Section 183 of the BNS …
The petitioner, claiming ownership of portions of Plot No. 216 in Agra, sought a mandamus directing the Agra Development Authority (ADA) to decide a representation dated 01.07.2025 and to recalculate external development charges after accounting for payments already made by the Society. The …
The applicant, Maaj, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 212 of 2025) alleging that he entered into a corporeal relationship with a 30‑year‑old woman on a false promise of marriage, violating Sections 69, 89, 352 and 351(2) of the BNS. The applicant contended that the relationship was …
The applicant, Imtiyaz Ahmad alias Raju Pilot, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashing of the charge and discharge in a POCSO case alleging sexual assault of a minor. He contended that the FIR was delayed, the victim was over 18, and no evidence supported the charge. The …
The petitioners challenged Rule 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Educational (Trained Graduate Grade) Service Rules, 1983 (as amended) on the ground that it failed to require a pass in the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) for appointment of Assistant Teachers to classes VI‑VIII, contrary to the NCTE …
The applicant, Rahul Khangar, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while the State's learned A.G.A., Shiv Dutt Shukla, was present. The court observed that the applicant showed no …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Nitesh Kumar, who is charged under IPC sections 376AB and 506 and Sections 5m/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual assault of a two‑year‑old girl. The applicant had been in custody since 30 June 2023, over two and a half years, and the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No. 95 of 2018, which involved charges of kidnapping, criminal intimidation, attempt to murder and rape under IPC sections 365, 504, 506, 376 and offences under the POCSO Act. They asserted that the …
The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed an acquittal granted by the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track)‑I, Bareilly, in a case under the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955. The prosecution alleged that four persons were caught cutting and selling beef, with 75 kg of meat and related …
Suraj was arrested in a case registered as Crime No. 96 of 2025 under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual offences at an OYO hotel. The FIR was lodged 12 days after the alleged incident, and the victim’s statement suggested consent, while …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Saurabh, accused under Sections 137(2), 64(2)(m) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual offences. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the alleged victim, a 17‑year‑old, had given a consent statement …
Ankit Kashyap was arrested in connection with offences under IPC sections 105, 351(2), 351(3), 352 and the Arms Act and has been in jail since 21‑12‑2024. Only one of the fourteen charge‑sheet witnesses, the informant, has been examined and the informant altered his statement about the place of the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay, who is accused under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted a delay of more than a year in filing the FIR, and pointed out his clean …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu, who was arrested in Crime No. 86 of 2025 under Section 137(2) of the IPC, Section 65(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shivam in a case under IPC sections 64, 352, 351(2) BNS and IT Act section 67A for allegedly circulating an indecent video. The applicant claimed innocence, stating he never possessed or recorded the video and that the co‑accused Amarjeet was …
The applicant, Farman, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 73 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the BNS Act, Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, and Section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST Act. The victim, who is reported to be slightly below the age of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mahima, who is accused under Sections 137(2), 87, 352, 351(4), 64(1) of the B.N.S.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant asserted that he is innocent and that the alleged victim, who gave a statement under Section 183 of the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Karan Mishra, who was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(M) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that the alleged victim was a consenting …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chahat in a criminal case (Crime No. 280 of 2025) under Sections 137(2), 65(2) of the B.N.S.S and Sections 5(m) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, though a minor, gave consent as per her …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Komal alias Hrishchandra, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2), 65(1) BNS and 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged outraging modesty that was later escalated to rape. The applicant pleaded innocence, arguing lack of medical …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vishan Yadav, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged victim was not pregnant, had refused a …
The applicant, Ashutosh Kumar Pathak, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 433 of 2025, which involved charges under Sections 50, 354(gha) IPC, Sections 11/12 of the POCSO Act, and Section 67(b) …
The applicant, Sherajulddin, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 246 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 64(2), 115(2), 352 of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, the FIR was lodged five months after the alleged incident, and there …
The applicant, Balkishun Bharti, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 191 of 2025) under IPC sections 65(2), 352, 351(2) and POCSO Act sections 5(M) and 6, alleging false implication in a sexual offence against a five‑year‑old victim. He claimed innocence, stating that no medical …
The petitioner, Ankita Tripathi, challenged a show‑cause notice issued by the principal of Bramhanand College for allegedly failing to disclose employment as required by a circular dated 24‑09‑2024. The petitioner argued that the circular should not apply to her because she had taken admission …
The applicant Kallu was arrested on 19 July 2025 in connection with a case involving alleged indecent video creation, charged under IPC sections 504, 506, 376(2)M, sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act, section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST Act and section 67 of the IT Act. He claimed the victim had consented to the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 33811 of 2023, which involved charges of cheating (Sec. 420 IPC) and criminal breach of trust (Sec. 406 IPC). The parties had reconciled voluntarily and executed a verified …
An application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Santosh Kumar Dhangar. Counsel for the applicant, Kamlesh Kumar Singh and Vivek Kushwaha, appeared, but the applicant himself was not present to prosecute the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dinesh Kumar, who was charged under Sections 87, 137(2), 65(1) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged sexual offence. The victim, aged 17‑18 as per an ossification test, claimed consent in a statement …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the application and sought its withdrawal. The court considered the request …
The petitioner, Sher Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel informed the court that subsequent developments had rendered the petition infructuous. No opposition was raised by the respondents, State of U.P. and others. The court accepted the …
Petitioner Shankar Kushwaha filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel informed the court that subsequent developments rendered the petition infructuous. The respondent did not oppose the prayer to dismiss the petition on this ground. The court examined …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case Crime No.248 of 2021) instituted under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506. The trial court, on a direction dated 02.02.2026, verified that the parties had reached a compromise, which was recorded …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bittu, who is accused in a murder case (Crime No. 60 of 2025) arising from the alleged suicide of his wife. The applicant argued that the death was a suicide, supported by the post‑mortem report, and that he has no prior criminal record, having …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Smt. Dr. Rajesh alias Vinesh, who was charged in Crime No. 279 of 2024 under Section 105 of the B.N.S., 2023 for allegedly administering treatment that led to a death. The applicant contended she was not a qualified doctor, was an …
The applicant, Jaipal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the charge‑framing order dated 25 March 2019 passed by the Sessions Judge, Shamli, which had framed charges under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections …
The applicant, Mohd. Belal Ansari, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel informed the court that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the bail and wanted to withdraw the application. The court considered the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the accused in a murder‑related case (Criminal No. 137 of 2020). The applicant, represented by counsel Rakesh Pathak, claimed innocence, alleged false …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Elan Kujur, who was charged under Section 420 of the IPC and Section 66‑D of the IT Act for alleged cyber fraud involving Rs 49,999. The applicant pleaded …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking relief, and subsequently moved a withdrawal application stating they wished to withdraw the pending petition and retain the liberty to file a fresh one. The court examined the record and the counsel’s submissions. It held that …
The Allahabad High Court heard an appeal by Smt. Arti Sonkar and another against the State of U.P. and others concerning succession and payment of terminal dues of the deceased employee Kripa Shankar. The court noted that the original petitioner‑respondent is alleged to be the second wife of the …
Arvind Koal @ Daga applied for bail before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant’s counsel, Sandeep Pandey, did not appear, though the Assistant Government Advocate was present. The court examined a report from the District Judge, Mirzapur dated 9 March 2026, which showed that the trial of the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application, although the learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The court noted the absence of the …
Appellant Yaseen filed a first appeal against the order of the lower court. No counsel or parties appeared before the High Court. The bench, noting the lack of prosecution, dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that had been in force was vacated. The judgment …
Anuj Yadav was charged under Sections 115(2) and 109 of the B.N.S. for allegedly pushing a train passenger, Mukesh Kumar, off a moving intercity train, causing the victim to fall under the wheels and lose both legs. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming the incident was an accident and that he …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sunil Kumar, who was arrested for allegedly possessing two Aadhaar cards with different dates of birth and using them to obtain two examination admit cards, thereby …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pankaj Kumar (Ajay) in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the Evidence Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the alleged victim, a 14‑year‑old according to the FIR, was actually a …
The applicant, Angad Kumar, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 75 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 65(1), 115(2), 351(2), 127(2) of the IPC, and Sections 3(2) and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The prosecution presented a forensic science laboratory report indicating …
The applicant, Ravindra, filed a bail application in a criminal trial (Crime No. 474 of 2024) where he is charged under Sections 126(2), 109, 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. He claimed absolute innocence, alleging that the victim, Sanjay, was intoxicated and attacked by unidentified assailants, and …
Jagatpal, accused under sections 109(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. in a case registered at P.S. Sajeti, Kanpur Nagar, applied for bail during trial, claiming he is falsely implicated and that both parties sustained injuries, making it unclear who the aggressor is. The applicant’s counsel …
The High Court considered a criminal revision filed by X, a minor aged 14 years, seeking to quash the bail denial order of the Special Additional Sessions Judge and the Juvenile Justice Board. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal history, and that no grounds under …
The dispute concerned the election of the Committee of Management of Aryan Educational Trust, Prayagraj, conducted by the Assistant Registrar, Prayagraj despite pending objections under Section 4‑B of the Societies Registration Act, 1860. The Single Judge set aside the election result, but the …
The petitioners filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Both the petitioners and the State were not represented in court, though a senior government advocate was present. The court noted the absence of all parties and, as a result, dismissed the …
The applicant, Hasan Chaudhary, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant informed the court that the application had become infructuous. The court considered the counsel's statement and found no merit in …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Deepak, who is charged with cyber‑fraud offences under various BNS provisions and Section 66‑D of the IT Act. The applicant asserted innocence, contending that his name …
The High Court of Allahabad considered the bail application of Sandeep Rajbhar, who had been in custody since 25 July 2025 in connection with offences under Sections 137(2), 115(2), 123, 70(2), 351(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Bailable Non‑Bailable (BNS) provisions and Sections 5(G) and 6 of the POCSO …
The applicants, Ramchandar and another, were arrested in connection with crime No. 206 of 2025 under Sections 109, 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the B.N.S. and have been in jail since 18 September 2025. They claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR was lodged more than 14 hours after the incident and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chhotu, who was arrested in connection with a POCSO case (Crime No. 228 of 2025) under Section 65(2) of the BNS and Sections 5M/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged ten hours after the alleged …
The appellant, Smt. Ruby, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking to set aside a Special Judge’s order rejecting her application under Section 173(4) of the BNSS. The High Court noted that the same facts …
The petitioner filed a supplementary affidavit seeking to have an impleadment application allowed in an appeal under Section 67(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. He contended that the complainant was neither a necessary nor a proper party and therefore should not be impleaded as a …
Petitioner Mohd. Tahir alleged that his cheques were stolen and misused, leading to a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He sought to set aside the order of the Additional District and Session Judge dated 14‑10‑2025 and the Special Court order dated 30‑11‑2022, claiming …
Petitioner Mohd. Tahir sought a direction under Article 227 to set aside an order dated 14‑10‑2025 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kanpur, in a criminal revision concerning a cheque‑bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He alleged that his cheques …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rakesh Kori, who is accused under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code in a case pending since 2014. The applicant claimed false implication, highlighted that the charge was framed in 2016 and that the trial had not progressed beyond the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Yuvraj Singh, who is accused in Crime No. 299 of 2025 under Sections 191(2), 109(1), 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the FIR only made a general allegation of firing and did not assign a specific role to …
The applicant, Kuldeep Nishad, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 109(1) and 118(1) of the B.N.S., alleged to involve an assault with an axe intended to kill the informant's son. He claimed innocence, arguing that the medical report showed no serious injuries and that he has no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS by Harshvardhan Jain, who was in custody for alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 319, 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 341(1) of the BNS, relating to operating an illegal "embassy" and possession of forged diplomatic …
The appellants challenged a summoning order issued by the Special Judge under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, arguing that the FIR was filed with a one‑day delay, that no assault or caste‑based insult was proved, and that the trial court ignored medical evidence. The respondents contended …
The revision petition was filed by Juvenile X, a 16‑year‑old who had been in custody since May 2025, seeking to quash the bail denial order of the Additional Sessions Judge and the Juvenile Justice Board. The petitioner alleged false implication, lack of criminal history, and an unduly long …
Arbaz Shah was arrested in a case involving alleged sexual molestation under Sections 64, 351(3), 137(2), 87 of the IPC and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged four days after the alleged incident, there was no medical evidence, and the …
The applicant, Vinod Kumar, filed a bail application under Section 64(1) of the Indian Penal Code in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 42318 of 2025, seeking release from custody pending trial. The applicant argued that he had previously been granted bail under Section 69 and Section 351(3) IPC by …
The petitioners, Jayhind Yadav and another, filed Writ Petition No. 18038 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petition was heard by a bench comprising Hon'ble Justices Arindam Sinha and Prashant Kumar. The court considered the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jeetu (alias Jitendra), who is accused in a case involving sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Dowry Prohibition Act relating to the death of his wife. The applicant claimed the death was a suicide, supported by the post‑mortem report and …
The applicant, Sachin Bhadautia, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel Prashant Mishra informed the court that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the bail relief and sought permission to withdraw the application. The court …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Rahul Yadav, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case involving Sections 3(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Hemendra Singh, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case involving offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 66‑D of the IT Act. The applicant claimed …
