Karnal Singh applied for bail in a cyber‑crime case (Crime No. 4 of 2025) under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 3(5), 238, 111(2)b of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 66C, 66D of the Information Technology Act. The FIR was lodged on 9 January 2025 despite the alleged illicit transactions beginning on 26 …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Mishra, filed a public interest litigation before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the petition and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court considered the submission and allowed the withdrawal. …
Dr. Vinod Kumar Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 22‑10‑2025 that had committed his criminal case to the Court of Session. The order was made by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur, under Section 323 of the Criminal Procedure Code, …
Shyamlal Bhuiyan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 554/2025) alleging child labour and trafficking, filed under Section 143(5) of the B.N.S. He claimed false implication, lack of detailed evidence on the deployment of children, and asserted no prior criminal record. The State opposed …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (WRIT‑C No. 3000096 of 2002) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, while the respondents’ counsel were present. The court noted the absence of …
The appeal was filed by two surviving appellants, Satya Dev and Rameshwar Dayal, against the conviction and sentencing order of a Special Judge in Mainpuri. Rameshwar Dayal had already been released on probation, while Satya Dev, a first‑time offender, was sentenced to two years and three months. …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Pravesh Dhama, accused in a criminal case under Sections 109(1) and 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the injuries to the complainant were not fatal, arguing he had no …
The applicants Rishipal, Bholambar and Rohit filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings arising from a charge‑sheet filed for offences under Sections 452, 323, 354, 504, 506 of the IPC and Section 3(2)(5A) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The …
The petitioners Jitendra Singh and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 3323 of 2022) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The petitioners' counsel was absent, and no interim relief had been granted. The court observed that the petition had become infructuous …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sundar Kumar, who was arrested on allegations of forging a sale deed and related documents to illegally transfer land in Baghpat. The applicant contended that he was innocent, that the case was essentially a civil dispute given a criminal colour, …
Anil Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking bail. The applicant's counsel later discovered a clerical mistake and requested to withdraw the application, seeking liberty to file a fresh one with correct particulars. The State, represented by an AGA, raised …
Petitioner Hazi Mukhtar Wasim filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the District Magistrate, Bareilly. The petition remained pending for an extended period, and the court observed that, due to the passage of time, the petition had become infructuous. No …
The revisionist Arshad Khan challenged a Family Court order granting his wife Rs 9,500 per month as maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C., arguing that the amount was excessive given his net salary of Rs 36,500 and his responsibility to support his parents and siblings. He also contended that his …
The appellant, husband of the respondent, filed an application under Section 340 CrPC/Section 379 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) alleging that the respondent gave a false affidavit regarding his employment with the Northern Central Railway. The Family Court rejected the application …
The appellant, Brajesh Singh, husband of the respondent, filed an application under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code (now Section 379 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita) alleging that the respondent made false statements in an affidavit filed in a Section 125 CrPC case. The Family …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Magistrate of Azamgarh to decide a recall application dated 11 July 2022, which sought to set aside an ex parte order passed on 6 July 2022 in Statutory Appeal No. 17/2010-11. The petitioners argued that despite filing the …
The petitioner, a bus conductor employed by the Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC), was disciplined for a low load factor that allegedly caused a revenue loss of Rs. 3,22,123. After a charge sheet and inquiry, he was initially penalised with a token recovery of Rs. 50,000 and a …
The petitioner, a 16‑year‑old son of a deceased Development Officer, sought a compassionate appointment under the LIC's 1993 Instructions after his father died in service. His mother applied for the appointment in 2013 but only later disclosed that the younger daughter had married, while earlier she …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amroha, on 18‑Jan‑2021 in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The …
The applicant, accused in Crime No. 367 of 2025 under Sections 109(1), 351(3), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., applied for enlargement of bail during trial. He claimed innocence, stating that no incriminating material was found on him and that the alleged weapon was recovered from a co‑accused. The …
The applicant, Parul Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.20389 of 2023, arising out of Case Crime No.463 of 2022) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehpur. She relied on a prior judgment …
The applicants, Shivam and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No.41 of 2024) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 324, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that the dispute had …
The petitioners, Ranjana and another, filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petitioners failed to appear before the court on the scheduled date. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State was present. The Hon’ble Justice Sanjay Kumar …
The applicant, Gulab Usmani, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking release from custody in eight criminal cases where bail had been granted but he could not furnish the required sureties. He contended that the cases were based on confessional statements, which he argued were …
The revisionist, a juvenile of approximately 15 years and 6 months at the time of a heinous offence, was declared a juvenile by the Juvenile Justice Board based on a medical report stating he was "about 16 years" old. The Board nonetheless referred him for trial as an adult under Section 15 of the …
The applicants Prem Singh and Vinod Singh filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the cognizance and summons issued by the Special Judge under the SC/ST Act and several IPC offences. The FIR alleged that the accused, while intoxicated, entered the complainant's house, assaulted …
The respondent, a former railway employee, claimed that his date of birth was incorrectly recorded as 27-08-1955 in his service book, leading to his premature retirement in 2015, whereas other documents showed his birth date as 27-08-1958 and a retirement date of 31-08-2018. He approached the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rajendra Sharma, who was in custody for offences alleged under Sections 318(4), 316(5), 61(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleged that …
The applicant, Mohd Aslam, sought to quash a summoning order dated 20‑11‑2025 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 4th, Bareilly, which had summoned the opposite parties under Sections 324, 325/34 IPC in a complaint arising from an alleged assault. The applicant contended that a prior …
The petitioner, Smt. Kaushal Agarwal, sought a four‑week extension to file a rejoinder affidavit in Writ‑A No. 20742 of 2024. The High Court, after hearing counsel, granted the requested extension and listed the case for further hearing on 30‑04‑2026. No substantive merits of the writ were addressed …
Smt. Nidhi Singh filed an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking transfer of a family court case (No. 2162 of 2022) from the Principal Judge, Family Court, Lucknow to the equivalent court at District Moradabad. An earlier order dated 13‑11‑2024 had dismissed the transfer …
The appellant Ugrasen was convicted under sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act and sentenced to three months' rigorous imprisonment and a fine. He appealed, not challenging the conviction, but contending that the trial court failed to consider the beneficial provisions of Section 360 of …
Girja Yadav was convicted under IPC sections 324 and 323 and sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine, and six months' imprisonment respectively. He appealed only against the sentence, arguing that as a first‑time offender the trial court should have invoked Section 360 of the CrPC …
The appellants, Banarasi and Sadhu Yadav, were convicted by the Additional District Sessions Judge, Varanasi, for offences under sections 324, 323 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment and fines. They appealed, not challenging the conviction itself, but contending that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Poonam Pal, who was accused of offences under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code relating to an alleged fraudulent sale deed. The applicant contended …
The appellant Raiyyan was convicted in a capital case and appealed his conviction. The Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court was divided, and under Section 392 of the CrPC the matter was referred to a third judge, who allowed the appeal and ordered the appellant's release. One of the original …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by Mohd. Dilshad, who was charged with IPC offences 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged 17 years after the alleged offence, that his …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vinay Shankar Lal, who was in custody for alleged offences under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 504 and 506 IPC arising from a chit‑fund fraud case. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that his …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad listed the criminal miscellaneous bail application No. 9065 of 2026 filed by Sandeep Singh Thakur against the State of U.P. for fresh hearing on 11 May 2026. The application was presented before Hon’ble Justice Harvir Singh. No substantive order on the bail …
The bail application filed by Karan Alias Kannu (applicant) against the State of U.P. was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Rajiv Lochan Shukla. No party appeared before the court on the scheduled date. The matter was adjourned and listed for further hearing after three weeks. No substantive …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate in Complaint Case No.2698 of 2024, which charged them with offences under Sections 323, 376D and 120(B) of the IPC. The opposite party had …
The applicant, Dinesh Saini alias Mintu, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the bail application, the person who had sustained injuries in the alleged offence died. The applicant’s counsel submitted this development before the …
The High Court considered the bail application of Ali Ahmad, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 419, 420, 506, 386 and 365 IPC relating to alleged fraud and intimidation in a property transaction. The applicant contended that the matter was essentially a civil dispute over …
Rohit alias Bittu filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel sought a short period to file a supplementary affidavit disclosing the current status of the trial and any witness statements recorded to date. The court considered whether to …
Mohd. Asif and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The applicants' counsel, Pradeep Kumar Tripathi, was not present in court to press the application. No request for adjournment was made on behalf of …
The applicant, Ramanuj Maurya, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The matter was listed before the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant while the State’s counsel was present. The court …
The appellant Bhopal was convicted by the Sessions Court for robbery (IPC s.392) and related offences, based on a police report of a 1981 armed robbery. The High Court learned that the original trial court record, including the charge‑sheet and evidence, could not be located and reconstruction was …
Mukesh, the sole surviving appellant, was convicted under Sections 324 and 34 of the IPC and sentenced to one year of rigorous imprisonment. He appealed the conviction, contending that the trial court failed to consider the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and the corresponding provisions of the …
The appellant Ram Swaroop was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bareilly, for assault with a dangerous weapon under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code after allegedly firing at the leg of the complainant's son during a Diwali incident in 2001. The prosecution relied on ocular testimony …
Petitioners, the Committee of Management of Beenapara Inter College, filed Writ Petition No. 35984 of 2015 before the Allahabad High Court. The respondents were the State of Uttar Pradesh and seven other parties. The petition was heard by Chief Justice Arun Bhansali and Justice Kshitij Shailendra. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal trial (Session Trial No. 1486 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 376, 511, 377 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that a compromise …
The applicant, Neha Kasturiya, filed a transfer application (Civil No. 229 of 2022) before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequent developments prompted her to seek withdrawal of that application, which was effected through Civil Miscellaneous Withdrawal Application No. 10 of 2026, supported by an …
The applicants Deepak Kumar and four others filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 19‑06‑2025 and a summons dated 10‑07‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 3030 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and …
Jamuna Prasad filed a writ petition (WRIT‑A No. 26959 of 2002) seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an order dated 15 June 2002 passed by the Director General of Police, PAC. The petition was presented before the Court No. 34, but the petitioner’s counsel did not appear at the hearing, and only the …
A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 3882 of 2026) was filed by Ashish @ Chichi @ Ashish Kumar against the State of U.P. and two others. The petitioner’s counsel, Irshad Ahmad, was listed in the cause list but failed to appear at the hearing, even after a revised call. The respondents, …
The applicant, Rajpati Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a directive to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.8, Allahabad, to expedite the trial of State vs. Suraj Singh (Case No. 624 of 2021) involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 452, 504 and …
The appellants, Heera Lal and others, filed a special appeal before the Allahabad High Court against the Cantonment Board, Jhansi. No instruction was filed by the appellants' counsel and no vakalatnama was filed on their behalf. The Court found that the appeal was not prosecuted. Consequently, the …
The appellants, Suresh Bilhatiya and another, filed a special appeal before the Allahabad High Court against the Estate Officer through Cantt. Board, Jhansi and others. No instruction was filed on behalf of the appellants and no vakalatnama was filed by any counsel. The Court observed that the …
The Special Appeal No. 328 of 2014 challenged a Single Judge’s order directing a fresh election of the Committee of Management of Binapara Inter College and the appointment of an authorized controller. The appellant argued that the earlier election of 2012 was invalid, while the respondents …
The appellant Mukut Singh had been acquitted by the trial court on 16 January 2023. Subsequently, an appeal was filed before the Allahabad High Court. The appellant's counsel moved a withdrawal application, arguing that the appeal was now infructuous due to the acquittal. The State's counsel raised …
The appellants Kallu and Chhinga were convicted under Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code for assaulting a deaf‑mute victim, resulting in a fractured hand, and were sentenced to two years' imprisonment with a Rs.500 fine. The prosecution evidence included the victim's gestured testimony, …
The appellant was convicted by the Sessions Court under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code for kidnapping a minor girl and sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.2,000. The appellant did not contest the conviction but argued that, given the incident occurred in 1979 and …
The appellants, who are government officials, were summoned by a Special Judge under the SC/ST Act on allegations that they demolished a house allotted under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana. The complainant, Ravi Shankar, failed to produce any documentary proof of ownership, photographs, or evidence …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Mohd Ekhlaq Malik, who was in custody for offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(2) and 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant contended that he was …
The applicant, Pappy @ Israr Hussain, was charged under Sections 376, 363, 354A and 506 IPC for a crime registered in 2014. After a ten‑year prosecution phase, the trial court closed the window for the accused to adduce defence evidence on 6 January 2026 and rejected his recall application on 28 …
The applicant, Afsar (Puneet Kumar Singh), filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster Act and the Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, claiming he was falsely implicated. He highlighted that he was already on bail in three gang‑related cases and one …
Vinod Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 13‑01‑2023 issued by the Additional Sessions Judge in a case under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court examined the FIR, the impugned order and the …
The appeal challenges the order of the Special Judge who convicted Ganesh Prasad Sharma and his sons under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and Section 3(2)(5A) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly preventing scheduled‑caste residents from using a government hand‑pump, installing a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jogendra (applicant) who is charged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 325 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly causing firearm injuries to four persons. The applicant's counsel argued that the prosecution case is false, the …
The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Cr.Case No. 5035/9 of 2019) arising from a 2018 case involving offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 376, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The counsel for the applicants submitted that a …
The appellant, Munshi Hashmi, challenged the service of notice to the second opposite party in a criminal appeal. The State contended that the notice was affixed to the house of the opposite party on 27.01.2026, and a photocopy was produced in court. The court examined the police reports and the …
The appellant Nitesh Pandey was charged under several IPC offences and Section 3(1)(d) of the SC/ST Act, with the FIR lodged seven months after the alleged incident. He contended that he was falsely implicated, citing lack of medical evidence, absence of independent witnesses, and no proof of any …
The Union of India appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against a series of orders of the Commercial Court, Kanpur Nagar that dismissed its applications under Section 34 of the same Act because it failed to make the statutory pre‑deposit …
The petitioners, Sursati Devi and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, they filed a withdrawal application supported by an affidavit stating they no longer wished to pursue the writ. Counsel for the petitioners requested that the writ be dismissed as …
The applicant, Prabhat Pandey, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash the charge-sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case filed under various provisions of the SC/ST Act and other offences. He alleged false implication, lack of credible evidence, and unfair investigation. …
The applicant, Maniram, sought enlargement of bail in a criminal case (Cr.No. 50 of 2014) involving alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B of the IPC relating to forged sale deeds and land mutation. He claimed to be merely a marginal witness in a civil dispute over land …
The appellants were summoned by a Special Judge under the SC/ST Act for alleged assault, caste‑based abuse and criminal intimidation arising from a dispute over payment for a boundary wall construction. The complainant claimed the appellants beat him and used casteist language, but his statements …
The appellants filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(1) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking quash of proceedings arising from a charge sheet that included offences under the IPC and the SC/ST Act. Both parties submitted a compromise deed, …
The appellants filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(1) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking quash of proceedings arising from a charge‑sheet filed on 14‑08‑2025. Both parties submitted a compromise deed, which was verified by the Special …
Neeti Verma filed a criminal transfer application (No. 22 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. No appearance was made on behalf of the applicant, and the counsel for the opposite party was the only one present. The court observed that both the applicant and her counsel had lost interest in …
The appellant, convicted under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code for theft during a dacoity in 1980, appealed his five‑year rigorous imprisonment sentence, arguing that he is now 75 years old and has already served almost the entire term. The High Court considered precedents where the Supreme …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order dated 21‑09‑2012 and the entire criminal proceeding (Complaint No. 4511 of 2011) under Section 307 IPC. Both parties claimed they had reached a free and voluntary compromise, …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Domestic Violence Protection Act, on the ground that the parties had amicably settled …
Shiv Prakash, an accused in a dacoity case, was acquitted by the Sessions Court. The seized gold ornaments, treated as case property, were not released to him after he filed an application under Section 452 CrPC, as the trial court said he failed to prove ownership. He appealed under Section 454 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to club two criminal proceedings arising from the same incident on 15 April 2022 – a Sessions trial (Case No. 365 of 2023) and a complaint case (Case No. 143 of 2022) pending before a Chief Judicial Magistrate. The petition …
Amir Ali and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 3763 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners and the petitioners themselves were absent. The State was represented by Additional …
The petitioners Subham Sugar Ltd. and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The court observed that, due to the passage of time, the petition had become infructuous. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition on the ground that it was no longer maintainable. The …
The State of Uttar Pradesh, through the Executive Engineering Department of the P.W.D. (N.S.) Highway Division, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition sought relief, but no specific relief or facts were detailed in the judgment. The Court observed that, due to the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash the charge sheet, summons and the entire criminal proceeding (Criminal Case No. 6559 of 2024) arising from a matrimonial dispute involving offences under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings arising from charges under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the dispute by a compromise dated …
The applicant, Neeraj Bhardwaj, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 27‑02‑2025, the cognizance and summoning orders dated 09‑01‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 2390 of 2026) relating to offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No. 641 of 2026, alleging that the parties had amicably settled the dispute through a compromise dated 20‑02‑2026. The charge‑sheet alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2) of the BNSS, Sections 3 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summons and the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 949/2023) arising from offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Domestic Violence Act. They claimed that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case (Case No. 17316 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and provisions of the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Marriage Act. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 354, 323 IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Women (Protection of Right on Marriage) Act, on the ground …
The applicants, mother‑in‑law and father‑in‑law of the accused woman, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 21000 of 2024, which arose from an FIR under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash criminal case No. 754 of 2020, which involved charges under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, arising from a matrimonial dispute. The parties had reached a full …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order issued by the Judicial Magistrate in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that the parties had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498-A, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that a compromise had been reached with the first …
Madanmohan filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction from Union Bank of India to clarify his outstanding loan amount and to permit repayment in easy installments. The Allahabad High Court held that a writ petition cannot be maintained against a private finance company, relying on …
Jb Industries filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner later sought to withdraw the petition, citing inherent defects in the pleadings and requesting liberty to file a fresh petition. Notice was served on the revenue counsel, and no objection was raised. The Court …
Vivabo Product Private Limited filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Upasna Agrawal, sought permission to withdraw the petition on the ground of inherent defects in the pleadings and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The court issued notice …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a dowry‑related criminal case on the ground that a compromise had been reached between the parties. The High Court noted that verification of any compromise is within the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 20‑04‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 14‑08‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 106309 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 498‑A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Amit Joshi under Section 483 of the BNS Act, 2023, seeking release from custody while facing charges under IPC sections 318(4), 340(2), 336(3) and 338 for alleged GST fraud. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, had no ownership …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 15256 of 2025) instituted by the State of U.P. for offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 506, 354 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The High Court …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case arising from alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 313, 323, 324, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had reached a …
The applicant, Arun Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 03.01.2025 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 09 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The High Court examined …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 926 of 2016) arising from offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had settled the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash a summons and charge sheet in a criminal case under Section 498-A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that the parties had settled the dispute by a compromise deed dated 11‑02‑2026. The respondents argued that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings arising from a charge sheet dated 31-10-2025 and an order taking cognizance dated 07-01-2026 under Section 69 of the B.N.S. and Section 4 of the D.P. Act. The High Court examined the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear or present counsel when the matter was listed. The respondents' counsel was present. The court, noting the absence of any representation for the petitioners, dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. …
The appellant Shambhu was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for kidnapping, assault, and rape of a 15‑year‑old girl under Sections 363, 366, 376 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The prosecution presented the victim’s testimony, …
The appellant, Smt. Bundo, died before the hearing of Criminal Appeal No. 2754 of 2017. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh, reported the death to the High Court. Consequently, the High Court declared the appeal abated and consigned the matter to the record. No substantive merits of the appeal …
The petitioner, appointed as an assistant teacher in 1999, sought regular salary and grant‑in‑aid benefits after the school was included in the grant‑in‑aid list in 2006. While other teachers holding B.Ed, L.T., or Moallim qualifications received the benefit, the petitioner, whose qualifications are …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 04‑07‑2014 and the ensuing criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 249 of 2014, alleging that the complaint was fabricated and that a family‑court compromise had been reached. They contended …
The petitioners sought relief under Article 227 of the Constitution to set aside two lower‑court orders dated 11 June 2025 and 28 January 2025 involving IPC offences. They claimed that the disputes underlying those orders had been amicably resolved through the Allahabad High Court Mediation and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 29‑08‑2024 and the related criminal proceedings under Section 386 IPC. The trial court had been directed to verify a compromise between the parties, which was duly verified on 16‑10‑2025. Both the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 13 June 2024 issued by a Judicial Magistrate in a complaint case under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code. They alleged that the complaint was filed to exert pressure in a …
The applicant, Sri Omprakash Sharma, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking the High Court’s interpretation of a Judicial Magistrate’s letter dated 23 May 2024 and direction to the trial court to comply with an anticipatory bail order dated 29 April 2024. The letter highlighted …
The petitioner, Upendra Nath Pandey, applied to have his bank account defrozen after it was sealed by police following an FIR under several IPC offences. The trial court dismissed the application, holding that the investigation was still pending, and the revisional court affirmed that order. The …
The applicant, Vivek Kaushal, filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash an interim maintenance order dated 12‑08‑2024 passed by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Kanpur Dehat in a Section 125 Cr.P.C. proceeding. The applicant argued that the respondent’s prior marriage had …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summons issued by a Judicial Magistrate in a complaint alleging assault and criminal intimidation. The applicant claimed the complaint was false, baseless, and that no prima facie case existed against …
The applicant filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash a criminal complaint (Case No.127368 of 2022) and a summoning order dated 12‑09‑2023, which alleged that he had assaulted and threatened his wife under Sections 323 and 506 IPC. The wife had earlier approached the mediation …
The petitioners, Parasnath Gupta and another, challenged an order dated 2 June 2014 that allowed a recall application filed by a contesting respondent and rejected the petitioners' revision on 12 September 2025. The petitioners claimed prejudice from the impugned order and sought relief under the …
The applicant, Smt. Hasina Khatoon, sought maintenance of Rs.2.64 lakh under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, after the husband repeatedly defaulted on payments despite an interim order of Rs.8,000 per month. The husband was sent to civil prison for non‑payment, but the …
The Committee of Management of Jai Prakash Degree College appealed a 06‑12‑2024 interim order that barred recognition of its elections without court leave. The appeal was filed 382 days after the order, exceeding the limitation period, and the appellant sought condonation of delay under Section 5 of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 27 September 2024 and the pending criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 294 of 2024) against them for offences under Sections 354, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. They alleged that the complaint was a …
Smt. Krishna Devi Upadhyay filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 52805 of 2000) before the Allahabad High Court against D.M. Etah and others. The petition was listed as “likely to be infructuous” and, on hearing, the court observed that no case was called out and that the passage of time had rendered …
The Committee of Management filed a writ challenging two orders of the Deputy Registrar under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, which registered a list of members for elections and later declared an unopposed election. The appellants argued that the Registrar had not provided reasons for …
The writ petition filed by New Victoria Mills was listed as likely to be infructuous. No parties appeared before the court. The court observed that, due to the passage of time, the petition had become infructuous. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as infructuous and any interim order was …
M/S Golden Land Development India Ltd. and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the Labour Court, Meerut and another. The petition was listed as "likely to be infructuous" and the court observed that, due to the passage of time, the petition had become infructuous. …
The petitioner, Ram Chandra, filed writ petition No. 53317 of 2000 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The petition was listed as "likely to be infructuous" and no further case was called out. The Court observed that, by the efflux of time, the petition had become infructuous. …
The Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC) filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. Over time, the petition became moot as the circumstances that gave rise to it ceased to exist. The Court observed that the petition was now infructuous due to the efflux …
Amar Singh and another filed a writ petition (Writ No. 53416 of 2000) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the Commissioner, Kanpur and others. The petition was listed as "likely to be infructuous" and no further case was called out. The Court observed that, due to the passage …
The petitioner, Naqli Ram, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Over the course of the proceedings, a substantial lapse of time occurred. The Court examined whether the petition remained viable after this delay. It held that the petition had become infructuous due to the efflux of …
The petitioners, Adhyaksha Mathur Vaishya Mahasabha Bhawan, filed a writ petition against the Presiding Officer of the Labour Court, U.P. Agra. The petition was listed as 'likely to be infructuous' and the court observed that, due to the passage of time, the petition had become infructuous. …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Gulzar, accused under Sections 302 and 394 of the IPC for a murder and robbery alleged to have occurred on 16 September 2017 in Noida. Gulzar contended that he was falsely implicated, that there were no eyewitnesses, no incriminating …
Geeta Saini, accused in a 2024 case under sections 109(1), 3(5) and 93 of the B.N.S. for allegedly burying a newborn female child, applied for bail while in custody since November 6, 2024. She claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was based on overheard information, that there was no material …
The petitioners (Union of India and others) challenged a Central Administrative Tribunal order that quashed a recovery of Rs. 17,92,741 from a retired Class‑III employee who had been transferred to a Telecom Office Assistant cadre without completing a mandatory training. The employee had retired …
The appellants challenged a High Court order that had merely observed that fresh elections could proceed pending jurisdictional determination, arguing that the observation effectively authorized the elections held on 23 March 2026. The Single Judge had declined to quash the communication scheduling …
The appellant, Kailash Yadav, filed an application seeking a stay of the conviction and sentence imposed on 30 November and 2 December 2023 in S.T. No.158/2018 for offences under Section 325 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellant argued that the judgment was illegal, the …
The applicants, Smt. Taslim Akhtar and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 11‑08‑2023, the cognizance and summoning order dated 21‑03‑2024, and the entire proceedings in Criminal Case No. 14342 of 2024 (State vs. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mushriv alias Aman, who was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case involving IPC offences (419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, 120B) and Section 66D of the Information …
The applicant, Rajan Singh alias Jitendra Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a discharge. The applicant's counsel, Prateek Srivastava, later moved the court to withdraw the application while reserving the right to file a fresh discharge …
Arun Bhardwaj filed a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court challenging a prior order. During the hearing, counsel for the revisionist informed the court that the revisionist no longer wished to pursue the matter. The State's Additional Government Advocate (A.G.A.) did not oppose this …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 18‑05‑2022 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 681 of 2025) for offences under Sections 323 and 504 IPC. They argued that the matter is a civil dispute, that the magistrate failed to …
The appellants, long‑time members of Janta Vidyalaya Samiti, challenged an order dated 24‑09‑2025 by the Deputy Registrar that declared them "rank outsiders" and excluded them from the Society's elected body. They argued that their membership, dating from 1997, had been continuously recognized and …
Ajay Kumar Singh filed Writ Petition (A) No. 1828 of 2005 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The court noted that the list of cases was being revised …
The petitioner, a registered owner of two plots in Mathura, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a 2018 order that withheld compensation for land acquisition and directing payment of compensation and solatium under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, …
Sudama filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a certiorari to quash an ex‑parte order dated 09‑12‑2025 issued by the Additional Commissioner, Administration‑IVth, Gorakhpur under Section 24(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, and a prohibition restraining interference with …
An application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was filed by Akash against the State of U.P. and three others. The applicant's counsel, Satya Prakash Singh, was present but the applicant himself was not. The opposing counsel, G.A., appeared before the court. The bench, noting the …
The applicant, Sachin Kumar Singh, sought bail for a series of offences including IPC sections on murder, kidnapping, and the IT Act, alleging that the FIR was filed after a long delay and that the allegations of fraud, blackmail and sexual exploitation were false. The prosecution contended that the …
The petitioners, Bindu Kumar and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Badalapur to decide their representation dated 23‑01‑2026 under Section 24(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to deliver possession of land and demolish illegal …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking quash of Criminal Case No. 935 of 2026, which arose from a matrimonial dispute and alleged offences under sections 85, 115(20), 152, 351 of the BNS Act and sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The parties had earlier settled the …
The petitioners, owners of several land parcels in Ghaziabad, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Development Authority to pay compensation under the 2013 DPR scheme and to decide an objection filed on 11.11.2023. They argued that their earlier petition (Writ No. 5673 of 2020) was …
Anand Shankar Pathak filed a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and no adjournment was sought. The court observed that the cause of action had become stale due to the passage …
The appellant, C/M Sri Ram Shanker Sachchidanand Pal Inter College, filed a special appeal but failed to appear before the High Court. No adjournment was sought and the respondents were represented. The Court observed that the cause of action had become stale, rendering the appeal infructuous due to …
The appellants filed Special Appeal No. 497 of 2014 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellants and no adjournment was sought. The court observed that the cause of action had become stale, rendering the appeal infructuous due to the passage of time. Consequently, …
Satya Prakash Sharma filed a civil contempt application (No. 829 of 2015) against Praveen Kumar Upadhyay. The applicant's counsel, Shyam Babu Vaish and Sri Ashok Khare, were not present, although the standing counsel appeared. The court observed that either the order it had earlier passed had been …
Dinesh Pratap Chand filed a civil revision petition (No. 80 of 2021) against Suresh Pratap Chand and five others in the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the revisionist to press the matter. Consequently, the court noted the lack of …
The appellants Bakhat Singh Gurjar and another appealed against the order of the Special Judge who had proceeded with a case under Section 304 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, alleging that they had assaulted a 75‑year‑old man who later died of septicemia. The …
The applicant Shishupal filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (S.S.T. No. 439 of 2018) arising from offences under IPC sections 308, 325, 323 and 504. The trial court had verified a compromise between the parties, a fact jointly acknowledged by both …
The petitioners, appointed as Extra Departmental Agents (Stamp Vendors), sought execution of a 2012 order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) that had quashed a 2009 order rejecting their claim and directed preparation of a seniority list for possible regularisation. The High Court noted …
The appellant Rajnish Shukla challenged the cognizance order and charge sheet filed under multiple IPC offences and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, alleging that the alleged assault and rape occurred inside a private house and therefore did not satisfy …
The applicant, Aradhana @ Arti, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 38 of 2025 against Haridarshan. Notices were issued on 5 February 2025 but the respondent failed to comply with the procedural steps ordered. The matter was subsequently listed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the CPC, and the court …
The appellant Jitendra was convicted by a Sessions Court for voluntarily causing hurt under Section 324 IPC and sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment. He appealed, not contesting the conviction, but seeking relief under the Probation of Offenders Act. The High Court examined Sections 4 of …
The applicant, Saurabh Gupta, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged supply of codeine‑based cough syrups under the NDPS Act. He claimed false implication and argued that his conduct, if any, pertained only to a licence violation under the Drugs and …
The applicant, Ravinder Mehta, an Assistant Inspector General of Registration/Assistant Commissioner of Stamp in Shamli, was arrested after a trap operation alleged that he demanded and accepted a bribe of Rs.1,00,000 to settle a stamp duty deficiency. The bail application was filed under Section …
The victim, a Scheduled Caste woman, alleged that she had a consensual relationship of over two years with the appellant, a Brahmin, and that he later refused to marry her while hurling caste‑based insults. The FIR was registered under Sections 69 and 352 of the IPC and Sections 3(2)(v) and 3(2)(va) …
Ilham Ur Rehman Shamshi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant sought time to file a supplementary affidavit to show compliance with a condition imposed in the interim bail order. The court considered the request and listed the matter for …
The appellant, Bashiruddin, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code challenging the dismissal of his suit for permanent injunction against the Nagar Palika Parishad, Muradnagar. The suit concerned three plots (Nos. 427, 428, 444) that the appellant claimed to own and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No.1547 of 2018) arising from Crime No.122 of 2013, which involved offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 379, 489 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 5 of the SC/ST …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash the order dated 28 August 2025 that rejected a restoration application under Section 48(3) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, despite a compromise between the parties. The dispute arose from a sale of a share in an agricultural chak, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Complaint No. 4640 of 2020 (Subhash v. Tarachand) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bijnor, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise. Both the applicants and the …
Petitioners Babu Lal and another filed a writ petition (WRIT C No. 1000034 of 2003) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, while the respondent State of U.P. was represented. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the …
The appellant, Smt. Rajeshwari Devi, filed an application seeking condonation of delay in submitting a substitution application after the death of respondents No.1 and No.3. The substitution application, intended to replace the deceased parties, was filed beyond the prescribed time, prompting a …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. No representative of the petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition. The State, represented by counsel, was present. The court observed that the petition could not be prosecuted in …
The petitioner, Dhruv Chandra Rai, filed Writ Petition (A) No. 6050 of 2017 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and there was no request for adjournment by either party. The petition was not prosecuted further. Consequently, the Court …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jeesan, accused in a POCSO case (Criminal No. 552 of 2025) involving alleged rape of a 16‑year‑old girl. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged belatedly, there were inconsistencies between the FIR and the victim’s statements under Sections …
Petitioners Ashma and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 15‑12‑2025 registered under various IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The State, through the Advocate General, submitted that the investigation was completed, a charge‑sheet dated …
Petitioner Babu Lal filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner for the priority hearing. The court noted the absence of the petitioner and dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that had been …
In Public Interest Litigation No. 207 of 2026, the petitioner, Umesh Chand Mishra, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Gaurav Sharan Srivastava, requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn. The standing counsel for the State …
The petitioner, Rama Nand Chaubey, filed Writ Petition No. 3678 of 1978 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents, D.D.C. and others. The petition was listed under the "Oldest Pending Cases" for priority hearing. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioner …
Ram Das Singh filed a writ petition (Writ B No. 4303 of 1979) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The petition was listed under the "Oldest Pending Cases" for priority hearing. No counsel or party appeared on the scheduled date to prosecute the petition. The Court observed that the …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 2514 of 1980 in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the Deputy Director of Consolidation and others. The case was listed under the "Oldest Pending Cases" for priority hearing. No counsel or party appeared on the scheduled date to prosecute the …
Girja Prasad filed a writ petition (No. 3018 of 1980) before the Allahabad High Court against the D.D.C. and others. The petitioner's counsel list erroneously included Mr. Rakesh Pathak, who was actually counsel for the respondents. The respondents pointed out this mistake, and no counsel appeared …
Ram Kunwar filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the Board of Revenue. The petition was listed but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the list was revised. Consequently, the court noted the absence of any prosecution of the petition. The judge dismissed …
The petitioner, Surendra Singh, filed Writ Petition No. 2248 of 1981 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents, D.D.C. and others. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to prosecute the matter. The court noted the …
The petitioner, Raj Kishore, filed Writ Petition No. 2151 of 1982 before the Allahabad High Court. The case was listed for priority hearing among the oldest pending matters. On the date of hearing, no representative of the petitioner appeared to press the petition, while the standing counsel for the …
The petitioners, Smt. Khazani and others, filed Writ Petition No. 2256 of 1982 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents, D.D.C. and others. The petition was listed under the oldest pending cases for priority hearing. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners even …
The petitioner, Vindra Ban, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed under the oldest pending cases for priority hearing. No further action or prosecution was taken by the petitioner. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 4763 of 1980 in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents. The case was listed under the oldest pending cases for priority hearing. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioners to prosecute the petition. The Court observed …
The petitioner, Shiv Karan, filed Writ Petition No. 2500 of 1982 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents, D.D.C. and others. The petition was listed for a priority hearing under the "Oldest pending cases" category. Neither the petitioner nor the private respondent …
Satya Narain filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for priority hearing under the "oldest pending cases" category. Neither the petitioner nor the private respondent appeared before the court on the scheduled date. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ …
We use cookies for analytics to improve your experience. Essential cookies are always on. Privacy Policy.