Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 14001–14200

SM.T GIDIYAversusA.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, T Gidiya, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed under the oldest pending cases for priority hearing. No further action was taken by the petitioner, and the petition remained unprosecuted. The Court, noting the lack of prosecution, dismissed …

REGIONAL PROVEDENT FUND COMMISSIONERversusRAJA RAM JAIPURIYA AND OTHERS

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner appealed against the trial court's acquittal of the Managing Director and Manager of Swadeshi Cotton Mills Ltd., who had been tried alongside the company and its occupier for an alleged violation of Section 14(1A) of the Employees Provident Fund and …

PARIKHAversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Parikha, filed writ petition No. 3175 of 1982 before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for priority hearing under the heading "Oldest pending cases for priority hearing". Neither the petitioner nor the private respondent appeared before the Court on the scheduled date. …

SHIV NATHversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Shiv Nath, filed a writ petition (Writ No. 3212 of 1982) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel or party appeared to prosecute the petition. The court noted that the case was listed under the oldest pending cases for priority hearing. Since the petitioner failed to pursue the …

DHOORAMversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petition filed by Dhooram sought relief against the respondents, D.D.C. and others. The case was listed under the oldest pending cases for priority hearing. No further action was taken by the petitioner, and the petition remained unprosecuted. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition …

SMT. RAM MURATIversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Ram Murati, filed writ petition No. 3324 of 1982 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents, D.D.C. and others. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to prosecute the case. The court noted the absence …

JAGDISH AND OTHERSversusBOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ B No. 3348 of 1982) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the Board of Revenue. The case was listed under the oldest pending cases for priority hearing. No petitioner appeared before the court, even after the revised list was issued. …

HARDWAR RAZAversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Hardwar Raza, filed Writ Petition No. 4668 of 1981 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents, D.D.C. and others. The matter was listed for priority hearing under the "Oldest pending cases" category. On the scheduled date, neither the petitioner nor the …

SMT. TAPESHRAversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Tapeshra, filed Writ Petition No. 5314 of 1981 before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for priority hearing under the "Oldest pending cases" heading. On the scheduled date, neither the petitioner nor the private respondent appeared before the Court. Consequently, …

JAGDISH AND OTHERSversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 5385 of 1981 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the date of hearing, and the petition remained unprosecuted. The Court noted the absence of any prosecution of the …

SHESHDHARversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Sheshdhar, filed writ petition No. 2153 of 1979 before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed for hearing but no representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The learned Standing Counsel and counsel for the respondents were present. The court noted the absence of …

JAI SHANKER AND OTHERSversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear or be represented at the hearing. The court noted the absence of any petitioner representation even after a revised list. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim order, …

BADDU AND OTHERSversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioners Baddu and others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No substantive hearing took place as the petition remained inactive. The court, noting the lack of prosecution, dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim orders that may have …

GAJADHARversusD.D.C.AND OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The case had been listed for priority hearing and earlier adjournments were requested by the petitioner’s counsel. On the hearing date, the petitioner’s counsel reported illness but failed to arrange an alternative …

SMT. PHOOL KUNWARversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

Smt. Phool Kunwar filed a writ petition (Writ B No. 500 of 1982) before the Allahabad High Court against D.D.C. and others. The petition was listed for a priority hearing under the "Oldest pending cases" category. On the scheduled date, neither the petitioner's counsel nor the private respondent's …

PRASOTTAM AND OTHERSversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 5135 of 1982 in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to advance the petition. The court noted that the petition remained unprosecuted. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ …

MURLI DHARversusD.D.C.

Petitioner Murli Dhar filed a writ petition against D.D.C. in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner for the hearing, even after the case was listed for priority. The court noted the absence of any representation to press the petition. Consequently, the writ …

SUDHEER YADAV ALIAS DEEPU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sudheer Yadav, who is charged under IPC sections 363, 366, 376, 506 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4 for alleged offences involving theft, kidnapping, rape and sexual assault. The applicant contended that the victim, a major, had her age …

DAL CHANDversusSTATE OF U.P.

An appeal (Criminal Appeal No. 2221 of 1985) was filed by Dal Chand and co‑appellants against the State of U.P. The court noted that, according to an office report dated 18 March 2026 and a report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etah, the appellant Dal Chand and two co‑appellants had died. In view …

RAMJAN MOHAMMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ramjan Mohammad, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 29 July 2025 passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Varanasi, which had been issued under Section 144 BNSS. The impugned order arose after the applicant …

SHYAM NARAINversusSTATE

The appellant, Shyam Narain, filed a criminal appeal (No. 3002 of 1985) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the appellant at the revised call, and the State was represented by A.G.A. The court's office report indicated that the appellant had died. Consequently, the court held …

SMT. LAKHPATIversusD.D.C.AND OTHERS

Smt. Lakhpati filed a writ petition (Writ‑B No. 218 of 1980) in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against D.D.C. and others. The case was listed under "Oldest Pending Cases for Priority Hearing". No counsel or party appeared to prosecute the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the …

KHARPATTOOversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioner Kharpattoo filed a writ petition (Writ‑B No. 2917 of 1980) before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed for priority hearing under the oldest pending cases. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner at any stage, including the revised list. The Court observed that …

K.P. SINGH AND OTHERSversusSTATE

The appellants, Krishna Pal and Ram Pal, appealed against an order under Section 446 of the Criminal Procedure Code that forfeited their surety bonds and imposed a penalty of Rs.4,000 each. During the pendency of the appeal, a report indicated that Ram Pal had died, leading to the abatement of the …

RAJMANversusDY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. A notice dated 4 January 2018 was issued to the petitioner to engage another counsel, but no appearance was made. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated. No …

GUNGE @ DEO NATHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant, Gunge @ Deo Nath, filed Criminal Appeal No. 2874 of 1988 against the State of U.P. While the appeal was pending, the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Jaunpur submitted a report dated 06‑02‑2026 indicating that the appellant had died, as confirmed by a report dated 07‑01‑2026. The High …

U.S. UPADHAYA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appeal filed by U.S. Upadhaya and Hari Shanker Pandey against the State of U.P. remained pending for many years. No counsel appeared for the appellants, though the respondent's counsel was present. The court sought verification of the appellants' status and received a report confirming that both …

RAMESHWAR SINGHversusSTATE

The appellant Rameshwar Dayal was convicted of attempting murder under Section 307 IPC for allegedly shooting his wife Vimla Devi. The prosecution’s case rested on the injured wife’s testimony, corroborated by her father, a medical doctor, and the investigating officer, despite the absence of the …

SANTOSH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE

The appellant, Santosh Kumar Singh, was fined Rs.100 under Section 350 of the Criminal Procedure Code for failing to appear in court and subsequently escaping custody. He appealed, arguing that his non‑appearance was due to departmental duties and not deliberate. The respondent contended that the …

BANKARAIversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

Bankarai filed writ petition No. 2790 of 1982 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against D.D.C. and others. The case was listed for priority hearing under the oldest pending cases. No petitioner or representative appeared to prosecute the petition, although the standing counsel for the …

GENDA LALversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

Genda Lal filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against D.D.C. and others. The petition was listed under the oldest pending cases for priority hearing. No further steps were taken to prosecute the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. …

STATE OF U.P.versusRAM BEHARI

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed the trial court’s order acquitting Ram Behari of offences under Section 25 of the Arms Act read with Section 14 of the Uttar Pradesh Dacoity Affected Areas Act, 1983. The prosecution alleged that the accused was found in possession of live cartridges without a …

SANTOSH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Santosh Kumar Singh, a police investigating officer, was taken into custody by a Special Judge but escaped and later returned, after which the court, invoking Section 345 CrPC, fined him Rs.200 for his misconduct under Section 228 IPC. The appellant challenged the fine, arguing his absence was due …

KARAN AND 4 OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 1190 of 2021) that alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Domestic Violence Protection Act. The applicant had deposited Rs. 15.50 lakhs as …

SATAN BAHADUR DHURIYA @ KHAJANCHIversusState of UP Others

The revision petition filed by Satan Bahadur Dhuriya challenged a Family Court order granting Rs. 5,000 per month as maintenance to his former wife under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner argued that the amount was excessive and beyond his financial capacity as a driver. The …

GOPAL YADAVversusState of UP AND 3 Others

The petitioner, Gopal Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to (i) decide on payment of his monthly salary with arrears and interest, and (ii) restore his employment as a Ward Boy. He also sought any other appropriate relief and costs. The petitioner’s counsel …

DR NEERAJ KISHORE MISHRAversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

Dr. Neeraj Kishore Mishra filed an intra‑court appeal seeking to set aside a single judge’s order dismissing his petition for a first or second service increment. The appeal was filed 23 days late, but the delay was condoned. The court examined whether the appellant had any legal entitlement to the …

AMIT GOND @ GHURAN GONDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case registered under Sections 76 and 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Sections 9(m) and 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The …

RINKU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Rinku Yadav filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Consolidation Officer (Respondent No.3) to decide Case No. 1197 of 2025 under Section 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation Act, 1953. The petitioner argued that the case was ready for final adjudication but remained …

JAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Jay Singh, filed a second anticipatory bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 4889 of 2020, seeking release on bail if arrested in connection with Crime No. 37 of 2015 under Sections 452 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The first bail application had already been …

JANVEDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Janved, accused under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, asserting that the victim, aged 17 per an ossification test (with a two‑year error margin), had …

KUNJEE LAL AND 3 OTHERSversusMUNNA AND 2 OTHERS

Kunjee Lal and three others filed a first appeal against Munna and two others before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel or parties appeared before the court on the scheduled date. The court dismissed the appeal on the ground of want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that had been …

MASTRAM AND 2 OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order dated 12‑10‑2023 and the entire criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 491 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376D, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. They contended that the …

MULAYAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

Petitioner Mulayam Singh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the petition citing changed circumstances and a desire not to pursue the relief. The respondent had no objection to the withdrawal. The Court examined the …

BIKAU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Section 11(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation (Land) Act seeking a mandamus directing the Settlement Officer, Respondent No.2, to decide a pending appeal (Appeal No. 1498, Sona Devi v. Bikau) within a fixed period. The standing counsel for the …

VINOD KUMARversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The revisionist filed a criminal revision against a Family Court order dated 10‑10‑2023 that enhanced his maintenance liability from Rs. 2,000 to Rs. 10,000 per month under Section 127 of the CrPC, resulting in arrears of about Rs. 21 lakhs. The original maintenance application was filed in 2007, …

BAJAJ AGENCIESversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Bajaj Agencies filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and other respondents. The petitioners failed to appear even after a revised call, and no further steps were taken to prosecute the petition. The Court observed that the petition was …

PRADEEPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Pradeep appealed against a bail rejection order dated 12‑01‑2026 passed by the Special Judge under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He claimed innocence and argued that a co‑accused, Kuldeep, had been granted bail in a similar case, invoking parity. The State opposed bail but …

SANVVARversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sanvvar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against him by the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The respondents submitted that a charge-sheet had been filed and the trial court had taken cognizance of the offence. The learned Additional …

GORAKH SINGHversusCHAIRMAN N.A.C. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Gorakh Singh, failed to appear before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad even after a revised call. Consequently, the court dismissed the special appeal for want of prosecution. The judges granted the appellant liberty to file a restoration application within one month if …

SALMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Salman, filed a second anticipatory bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 7151 of 2020, seeking bail in a case (Crime No. 239 of 2019) involving alleged offences under Sections 452, 354, 354(Ka) and 376D of the Indian Penal Code. The first bail application had …

ANUJ KUMAR SHUKAL ALIAS ANUJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Anuj Kumar Shukla filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 09‑10‑2021, the cognizance order dated 07‑12‑2021, and the entire proceedings of case No. 2679 of 2021 relating to offences under Sections 504, 506 and 324 IPC. The parties had reached a …

AYUSH PATELversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ayush Patel applied for bail in a cyber‑fraud case (Cr. No. 17 of 2025) involving alleged opening of fake bank accounts and transfer of Rs 1 crore, charged under IPC sections 318(4), 336(3), 338 and IT Act section 66D. The applicant was not named in the FIR; his alleged involvement was derived from …

RAM PRATAP AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance and summons in a criminal case (Criminal Case No. 19385 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 308 IPC. Both parties submitted that they had settled …

RAMCHANDAR PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS

Ramchandar Pal filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking mandamus to protect his life and liberty and to compel the District Magistrate of Mirzapur to decide an application dated 17‑12‑2025. The State of Uttar Pradesh contended that the dispute was private in nature and that the …

SANJEET KOL @ KALLUversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sanjeet Kol @ Kallu in a criminal case (Crime No. 190 of 2024) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, highlighting a delayed FIR, the …

C/M P.M.S. PUBLIC SCHOOLversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioners, C/M P.M.S. Public School, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 72580 of 2010) against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners even after the revised call. The Court observed that the petition was not prosecuted and therefore dismissed it for want …

SARGAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sargam, accused under Sections 137(2), 64, 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged incident on 19‑11‑2025. The FIR was lodged on 28‑11‑2025, a delay the court deemed fatal to the prosecution’s case. The victim, …

MONU @ CHHOTU @ CHHOTELALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered the bail application of Monu @ Chhotu @ Chhotelal, who was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)m of the B.N.S., Section 5(j)(ii)/6 of the POCSO Act and Section 3(2)5 of the SC/ST Act. The court observed that the FIR was …

ARJUNversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Arjun filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal case (Case No. 117 of 2013) arising from FIR under Sections 363 and 366 IPC. He alleged that the FIR was based on false facts, that the alleged victim was a major who voluntarily …

MAQSOODversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court and subsequently filed a withdrawal application supported by an affidavit, seeking dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn. The petitioner’s counsel, Avinash Pandey, stated that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the …

RAM BHARAT @ RAM BHARAT SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing certain respondents to refrain from interfering with his peaceful possession of a 0.44 hectare plot of land in Ghazipur and to take action against other private respondents. The State's standing counsel objected, contending that the matter was a …

SONUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Sonu, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. Counsel for the applicant requested that the application be dismissed as withdrawn, citing the inability to annex certain documents and to plead essential facts. The court considered the prayer …

AMARNATH SAHANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Amarnath Sahani, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 61(1), 70(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, pointing out inconsistencies between the FIR, …

ANILversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Anil, filed a second criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 12027 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court after his first bail application had been dismissed. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The court …

SAWANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sawan, who was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 64(1) and 69 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4(1) of the POCSO Act, alleging a sexual offence that allegedly occurred on 18‑10‑2025. The applicant contended that the victim …

SMT. INDRA DEVIversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

Smt. Indra Devi filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 42560 of 2014) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the Union of India and three others. The petitioner's counsel, Rajendra Prasad Tiwari and Vinay Kumar Tiwari, were listed but did not appear before the court. The respondents were …

SMT SUMITRA DEVIversusSTATE OF UP AND 6 OTHERS

The appellant, Smt. Sumitra Devi, filed an application under Section 173(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS) invoking Section 14-A(1) of the SC/ST Act, alleging simple assault. The Special Judge rejected the application on the ground that no written complaint was filed with the SHO and no …

RAM KISHAN ALIAS KISHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ram Kishan alias Kishan filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel informed the court that the sole petitioner had died, rendering the petition infructuous. The court held that the death of the petitioner abates the proceeding. Consequently, the petition was …

VINAY KUMAR JAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vinay Kumar Jain, sought mandamus directing the police not to interfere with his brick‑kiln business and to expedite a representation filed on 07‑11‑2025. He alleged that a partner, Smt. Rita Jain, with her brother’s collusion, was obstructing his business, filing false FIRs, locking …

SHAILENDRA SINGH @ SAINEEversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Shailendra Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 192 of 2017) involving alleged offences under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. This was the third bail application filed by the applicant, after two earlier applications …

ROBINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Robin appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking to set aside a bail rejection order dated 22‑01‑2026. He claimed innocence and argued that a co‑accused, Rahul Chaudhary, had been granted …

GIRJA SHANKAR DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Girja Shankar Dubey, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summoning order and all proceedings in Special Session Trial No. 898 of 2025, arising from a 2012 FIR and a charge‑sheet filed in 2025. He argued that the more‑than‑13‑year delay in …

BRAHMCHARINI DR. REKHA JAINversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Dr. Rekha Jain filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Chairperson of the Uttar Pradesh State Commission for Women to decide a representation filed on 01‑09‑2025. The petitioner alleged that despite filing the representation, no decision had been taken, causing undue delay. …

SMT.ARTI UPADHYAY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, a married couple, filed a writ seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their marital life and to provide protection against alleged harassment. They asserted that their marriage was consensual, no FIR had been lodged, and they faced threats from respondents. The …

RAKESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rakesk Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition concerned a matter that was pending the outcome of the Bar Council of India election, which was expected to conclude in about six months. Respondent No.2, through counsel, informed the Court that the …

DEEPAK YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Deepak Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Sub‑Registrar of Bareilly to register a will deed dated 22‑07‑2021 and to decide pending applications filed on 05‑12‑2023 and 24‑12‑2025. The petitioner alleged that despite filing a representation on 24‑12‑2025, no …

MAHAFOOJ ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, a farmer holding recorded tenure of two agricultural plots in Banda district, alleged that respondents No.5 and 6 had illegally encroached upon his land and were conducting mining activities that damaged his crops. He claimed to have made representations to the competent authorities …

PRAMOD KUMAR TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Pramod Kumar Tiwari, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State respondents to act on his application dated 22-12-2025 and to remove an alleged illegal encroachment on his land, also seeking compensation for damages. The State argued that the dispute was private and …

BHANU MAURYA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants Bhanu Maurya and another were charged under sections 323, 504, 506, 452 of the IPC and Section 3(1)(X) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 based on an FIR filed by an informant who claimed to belong to a Scheduled Caste. They filed a …

SURENDRA KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order of the Additional Civil Judge that summoned them under Sections 323, 427, 504 and 506 of the IPC in a complaint filed by the opposite party. The applicants alleged that the complaint was …

SANTOSH MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Santosh Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking to quash a summons dated 05‑02‑2024 issued in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 IPC for failure to repay money obtained through cheques. The applicant argued that the dispute was a …

JUVENILE (S)versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The revisionist, a juvenile detained in a Juvenile Care Home, filed a criminal revision under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2015, seeking to set aside the Juvenile Justice Board’s order denying bail and the appellate court’s affirmation of that order. The revisionist …

PREMversusSTATE OF U.P.AND ANOTHER

The applicant sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 84 of 2019) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 376-D and 506, Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, and Section 3(2) of the SC/ST Act. This was the second bail application filed; the first had …

DAL CHAND AND ANOTHERversusTHE UNION OF INDIA

Dal Chand and another filed a first appeal before the Allahabad High Court against an order of the Union of India. No parties appeared before the court on the scheduled date. The court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have been in force. The …

RAJBABU @ BABUANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajbabu @ Babuan, who is charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged incident on 28‑11‑2025. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged belatedly, the victim was a minor …

RAMESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramesh in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, citing a six‑day delay in filing the FIR and alleging that the victim’s age was incorrectly recorded, …

NET RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioners, represented by counsel Sachin Kumar Sharma, filed Writ Petition No. 5717 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and nine other respondents. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel prayed to withdraw the writ petition. The standing …

GOPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Gopal Singh filed a special appeal (No. 215 of 2007) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared for the appellant even after a revised call. The Court observed that the appeal had not been prosecuted. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal for …

MOHD KAIFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Mohd Kaif, sought bail in a criminal case (M.A. No. 69/2025) alleging offences under IPC sections 64(1), 61(2)(k), 127(2), 351(2) and 352. He contended that the allegations were false, that he was falsely implicated, and that the prosecution’s evidence was weak. The State opposed …

KARAN RATHORE AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings arising from a charge sheet dated 23.03.2022 under Sections 498A and 323 IPC. The applicants had deposited Rs. 15,96,577 as directed by the court, part of which was released to …

RUKMESH GUPTA AND 23 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, a group of 24 individuals, filed a writ petition challenging orders dated 11 September 2012 and 24 December 2025/19 January 2026 that denied them a refund of premium money deposited with the Nagar Palika Parishad Tilhar. They sought a certiorari to quash those orders and directed …

AMIT KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Amit Kumar Singh, challenged a suspension order dated 12‑12‑2025 that attached him to a government Ayurvedic hospital pending disciplinary proceedings. The respondents argued that disciplinary action was being initiated, a charge sheet was to be issued shortly, and the petitioner was …

SUDHA MISHRAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Sudha Mishra filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue any alternative legal remedy. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh raised no objection to the …

SUMER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sumer Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The court accepted this prayer and ordered the dismissal of the petition on the ground that it was not pressed. The …

LALLUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Lallu applied for bail in a criminal matter (MU/AS 482/2025) invoking sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the Constitution and Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The State alleged that the applicant was involved in a serious offence and sought denial of bail on grounds of possible tampering with …

KM RITU SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Km Ritu Singh, challenged the document verification and final result of the UP Police Computer Operator Grade A 2023 direct recruitment, alleging that her OBC caste certificate, though issued later, should be accepted. The recruitment advertisement required OBC candidates to submit a …

MOIUDDINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Gaon Sabha initiated proceedings against the petitioner under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which were later dropped by the Assistant Collector. The Gaon Sabha filed a recall and stay application, which the court allowed. The petitioner then filed a statutory appeal under Section …

GUDIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Gudiya, filed a second anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 406 and 506 IPC. Her earlier anticipatory bail request was rejected by the Allahabad High Court in 2020 after being heard on merits. She argued that …

MAHIR HUSAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Mahir Husain filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the summoning order dated 7 May 2019 and the entire criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 5597 of 2018) relating to offences under Sections 323, 324, 354, 354‑B and 452 IPC. Both parties submitted a …

ALOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Alok Kumar filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 35835 of 2024) initiated against him under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for a cheque bounce. He argued that the dispute was essentially a money claim and could be settled …

SANTOO @ SAJIDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Santoo alias Sajid, was convicted and sentenced by the Special Judge under the POCSO Act in Sessions Trial No. 164 of 2016. He filed a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 16679 of 2019) before the Allahabad High Court. The High Court noted that the Sessions Judge and …

MAYANK CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad heard bail application No. 6096 of 2026 filed by Mayank Chauhan against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The applicant's counsel, Rishi Kesh Malviya, sought bail, while the opposite party was represented by G.A. The court noted that the applicant …

RAJENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition which the Court found to be not pressed. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested dismissal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court allowed the prayer, dismissing the petition as not pressed and granting the liberty to approach …

ANAND KUMAR AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants challenged a cognizance and summoning order dated 10‑12‑2025 issued by a Special Judge under the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in a criminal complaint alleging assault, property damage and other offences. The appellants argued that the complaint …

LALU @ AJAY @ PRADEEP @ HARVESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Lalu @ Ajay @ Pradeep @ Harvesh, who is charged under Sections 2/3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant …

MUNSILAL AND 13 OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, a group of scheduled tribe members, filed a writ petition seeking a record of their forest rights from the State Government. They had earlier submitted an application on 12-12-2025 to the second respondent, which remained unconsidered. The petitioners argued that their request was …

DR NAFEESversusSTATE OF U.P.

Dr. Nafees applied for bail in a case where he was not named in the FIR but was later mentioned in a second statement, with only a vague role assigned. The alleged incident involved minor injuries to two persons and there is no corroborative evidence linking the applicant to the offences. The State …

DEVENDRA @ BABLOOversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Devendra (Babloo), was summoned in a complaint case alleging criminal breach of trust under IPC Sections 420 and 406. He filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482, claiming innocence, lack of prior criminal record, and that the two offences cannot stand together as …

ANKUR JAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR

The applicant, Ankur Jain, filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash the summons dated 23 March 2019 and the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.1815 of 2017 (Bijendra Kumar Jain v. Ankur Jain) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baghpat, under Section 354 IPC. Both parties …

SUNILversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Sunil, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 224 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POPCSO Act. The trial court had already convicted him of these offences. The informant’s counsel argued that the …

SAHAB LALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sahab Lal, challenged an order dated 08.05.2023 that quashed eviction proceedings initiated under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The State appealed the quash order under Section 67(5), and the Additional District Magistrate set aside the quash order, directing a fresh …

GANGARAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner challenged the order of the Additional District Magistrate/Additional Collector (Civil Supply), Prayagraj, which set aside an earlier order quashing eviction proceedings and remanded the matter for a fresh decision with a hearing. The petition sought a direction that the Assistant …

MAZIDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Mazid, sought bail in a case involving multiple serious offences under the Indian Penal Code, having been in custody since August 2020. This was his second bail application after a prior rejection. Counsel argued that the trial was progressing slowly, with only four witnesses …

SURESH CHAND AND ANOTHERversusRAMESH AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Suresh Chand and another, filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Alok Kumar Srivastava, moved the court for withdrawal of the petition. The court considered the request and, finding no objection, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the …

MAHESH PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Mahesh Pal Singh, convicted of offences under Sections 302, 34 and 120B of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, had filed a bail application (No. 24460 of 2021) before the High Court of Allahabad. The District Judge submitted a compliance report and an affidavit from the Senior Superintendent …

MOHIT YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants Mohit Yadav and another appealed under Section 14‑A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against a cognizance and summoning order dated 21‑April‑2022 that had been issued in a case involving alleged molestation of the complainant's …

ANIL KUMAR DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Anil Kumar Dubey, was charged under Section 14‑A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly threatening a woman who claimed to be his brother's first wife and for using casteist slurs. The FIR alleged that the appellant, together …

REENA DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking to quash orders dated 19.11.2024 and 18.10.2025 issued by the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Varanasi, which remanded a matter back to the Tehsildar of Shakaldeeha, District Chandauli. The petitioners later limited their prayer to directing …

FIROZ AHMEDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Firoz Ahmed filed a public interest litigation seeking a mandamus directing the State to remove an alleged illegal encroachment on Gata No. 901 Ka (0.3560 ha) in Village Vairagal, Basti, and to compel the District Magistrate to decide his application dated 30‑Oct‑2023. The State Law Officer informed …

DEEPAKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Deepak was convicted in a lower court of rape and related offences under Sections 69, 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3(1)s, 3(2)5 of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, based on a complaint that he lured a 22‑year‑old woman with a false promise of …

DINESH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Dinesh and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 11304 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad. They argued that they had not been arrested and that a charge‑sheet had …

VEERPAL CHAUDHARY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The appellants Veerpal Chaudhary and Lokesh Chaudhary appealed against a charge-sheet and order of a Special Judge under the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The victim’s FIR alleged that Veerpal assaulted and molested her in a forest, while later statements under …

NISHU @ BHUVNESH SWAROOPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Nishu @ Bhuvnesh Swaroop in a case arising from a delayed FIR concerning a death on 10‑10‑2025. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR was lodged nine days after the alleged incident and that the …

GULAM HUSAINversusCOMMISSIONER AND 5 OTHERS

The Gram Sabha initiated proceedings against Qayyum Ahmad, which were later dropped by the Assistant Collector on 17‑08‑2021. Gulam Husain, who was not a party to those proceedings, appealed the order under Section 65(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, but the appeal was dismissed by the Additional …

MANJU DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manju Devi filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking payment of her retirement dues from the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. No counsel appeared on her behalf at the hearing. Respondent No.4, represented by Advocate Shobhit Pratap Singh, informed the court that the …

SUBHASH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Subhash and two others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Deputy Director of Consolidation to refrain from initiating proceedings under Section 48(3) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, and to decide an objection filed on 01‑09‑2025. The petition also …

MITHUN LONAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Mithun Lona, who was in custody for alleged violations of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 (Sections 3, 5A, 8) and the Animal Cruelty (Prevention) Act, 1960 …

SANDEEP SINGHversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner challenged an order dated 12 January 2026 issued by the Additional Commissioner (Administration) of Kannauj. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested that the writ petition be dismissed on the ground that it was not pressed. The respondent counsel, including the Standing …

JEETU KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Jeetu Kumar, who is charged under Sections 498‑A, 323, 304‑B of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for the alleged dowry‑related death of his wife. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserted that his …

MUSTAFA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the CrPC on behalf of Mustafa and Rihan, who were charged under Sections 8 and 21 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 185 grams of contraband, a quantity below the commercial threshold. The applicants argued that no …

SANDEEP YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Sandeep Yadav, sought bail in a case registered under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) and sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging that the FIR was filed fraudulently and that the alleged victim was a consenting adult in a romantic relationship with him. The prosecution opposed …

GUDDU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Guddu and another, filed a writ petition challenging the non-issuance of a caste certificate. The petitioner's counsel limited the relief sought to petitioner No.1, arguing that petitioner No.2's claim could not be entertained in the present petition. The Court dismissed petitioner …

RAJAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita on behalf of Raja, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 187 of 2025 involving offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The applicant argued that he was …

LOKESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Lokesh filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 7954 of 2025) before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad seeking release from custody. The applicant was represented by counsel Abhishek, G.A., while the State of U.P. was represented by G.A. and Yogendra Pal Singh. The court examined …

DINESH @ GUDDAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Dinesh @ Gudda, filed a third criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The court noted that the applicant's earlier two bail applications …

SOMARU SADHUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, a priest, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the removal of alleged illegal encroachments on land belonging to Shiv Ji Mandir in Ghazipur district, and also sought costs. The petition was filed in his individual capacity, and the respondents were …

KAMAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kamal Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash a 21 April 2025 order rejecting his representation and a mandamus directing the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Koil to order police eviction of respondents 4 to 8 from a plot purchased by his wife. The petition was filed …

YOGESH KUMAR SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioners Yogesh Kumar Sharma and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioners, through counsel Ashish Srivastava, expressed a desire to withdraw the petition while retaining the right to pursue any other legal remedies. The Court …

PRABHAKAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Prabhakar Mishra, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 160 of 2016) involving charges under Sections 498-A, 302, 201 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. This was the third bail application filed by the applicant, the earlier …

BHOLA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Bhola and two others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and other respondents. During the proceedings, the petitioners' counsel prayed to withdraw the writ petition, requesting liberty to pursue any alternative remedy …

ARVIND KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Arvind Kumar filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 17 December 2025 issued by the Assistant Collector‑Tehsildar of Etawah, which directed him to submit a reply within a stipulated period. The petitioner did not file the required reply before approaching the court. The High Court examined …

MUMTAZ AHAMDversusPURVANCHAL VIDHUT VITRANA NIGAM VARANASI AND ANOTHER

The petitioner applied for an electricity connection which was rejected by the second respondent, the Executive Engineer, without any notice. The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the rejection. The respondents argued that the petition was of no utility and sought a direction to the …

SANTI ALIAS GAURAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Santi alias Gaurav, filed a second anticipatory bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 30365 of 2020, seeking release on bail if arrested in Crime No. 74 of 2018 under Sections 306 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code. The first anticipatory bail application had already …

SMEER RAGHAVversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. The counsel for the applicant later moved that the application be withdrawn. The State's Advocate General was present but made no objection to the withdrawal. The court considered the …

LAKHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Lakhan Singh filed a writ petition seeking multiple mandamus orders to compel various state respondents to decide his representation, vacate mud fill, stop construction, and remove mud from his agricultural land in Prayagraj. The State Government’s standing counsel highlighted a Government Order …

SMT HARVANSH KAURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt Harvansh Kaur, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged illicit liquor possession and assault on police officers, with charges under multiple IPC sections and other statutes. She contended that she was falsely implicated, was a minor at …

SACHIN @ YOGESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sachin @ Yogesh, filed a second anticipatory bail application in a criminal case involving alleged offences under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The first bail application had already been rejected by the same court. No counsel …

SHIV KUMAR YADAV AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 33 of 2026) arising from offences under various IPC sections. They argued that they had not been arrested and that the charge‑sheet had already been filed, with the alleged …

DHARMENDRA GUPTA @ BECHUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Dharmendra Gupta, who was charged under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant asserted innocence, denied any gang …

CHOTE LAL DHANGARversusADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but later filed an application, supported by an affidavit, seeking to withdraw the petition due to subsequent developments. The court examined the affidavit and considered the petitioners' desire to discontinue the proceedings. It held …

AMAN MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Aman Mishra filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel argued that there were mistakes in the way the respondents were listed (the array of respondents). The court examined the claim and found that the procedural defect …

MOHIT KUMAR JATAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mohit Kumar Jatav, who was charged under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant pleaded innocence, …

JITENDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jitendra Yadav, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing certain respondents to take legal action to remove encroachments on public utility land in Fulaich village, Azamgarh. The petitioner alleged that the land, recorded as a pit, wasteland, and pond, …

M/S MERINO INDUSTRIES LTD AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

M/s Merino Industries Ltd, a decorative ply manufacturer, sought a mandamus directing the Hapur Pilkhuwa Development Authority (HPDA) to provide a green buffer zone between its factory and a proposed residential colony, citing specific provisions of the HPDA's 2008 Bye-laws. The petitioners argued …

RAM NARESH SINGHversusMANAGING DIRECTOR, U.P. JAL NIGAM AND 2 OTHERS

Ram Naresh Singh, a former employee of U.P. Jal Nigam, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the employer to pay his retirement dues, including gratuity, leave encashment, arrears of dearness relief at rates ranging from 164% to 212%, and interest of 9% from 29 February 2024. The …

NEERAJ AGARWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Neeraj Agarwal filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, but the Attorney General objected that the applicant’s earlier complaint had already been dismissed on 23 September 2025 and the second opposite party had been acquitted, making an appeal against the …

SMT GANGOTRI DEVIversusSTATE OF UP AND 14 OTHERS

Smt. Gangotri Devi filed a writ petition seeking a directive to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Phoolpur, to decide Appeal/Case No. 18050 of 2025 without further delay. The petitioner argued that a considerable period had elapsed without a final decision. The Court observed that putting the …

SUJEET YADAV @ GOLU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Sujeet Yadav, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant …

NUTAN THAKURversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Nutan Thakur in connection with an FIR lodged after a 26‑year delay alleging fraud and forgery in the allotment of an industrial plot (IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B). The …

MATUL GUPTA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 8480 of 2025) arising from an FIR dated 27.08.2024. The charge‑sheet had already been filed against them, though they had not been arrested, and the alleged offences carried …

PANKAJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Pankaj Kumar, who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant pleaded …

RAJESH KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rajesh Kumar Yadav, a postal employee accused of absconding with approximately Rs. 25.36 lakh. The applicant argued his innocence, highlighted a two‑month delay in filing the FIR, and cited postal rules that require cash …

MUNNA GAUTAM ALIAS MUNNAversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Munna Gautam, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Crime No. 235 of 2023) filed under IPC sections 193, 211, 452, 427 and 511. He argued that he had not been arrested, the charge‑sheet was already filed and the offences carried …

AJAY KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, was convicted under Section 25 of the Arms Act and fined Rs.2,000, a sentence that had been completed before the filing of the writ petition. He sought a writ directing the issuance of a passport without the requirement of a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the …

MOHD. AKIBversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mohd. Akib, who is charged under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant asserted that he is …

ROHIT RAJAK @ SONUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the summoning order and the criminal proceedings initiated under IPC sections 452, 323 and 504. The High Court examined the record and observed that the dispute revolves around factual issues that cannot be decided at …

SAURABH YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 911 of 2025) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Jaunpur, arising from offences under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506. They argued that they had not been …

ALOK YADAV @ ALOK KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Alok Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 1840 of 2024) and a summoning order under Sections 420 and 323 of the IPC. The High Court examined the record and found that the allegations against the …

SANYOGITA RAOversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sanyogita Rao, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 21255 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504, 307 and 212 of the IPC. During the hearing, the applicant’s …

BAHARE ALAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Bahare Alam, who was charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed …

NEM SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged an order dated 29‑12‑2025 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Shikarpur, which had dropped proceedings initiated under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 against private respondents for alleged illegal occupation of land reserved for public purpose. The …

ANIL KUMAR PATAIRAYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 seeking mandamus to remove alleged illegal encroachments on government land (plots 2016 and 2093) in Konch, Jalaun, and to compel revenue authorities to decide a representation dated 27‑02‑2025. The respondents contended that the …

SUKHDEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners prayed to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue any alternative remedy available under law. The Additional …

SMT SONI ARORA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a married adult couple, sought a writ of mandamus to prevent any interference in their marital life and to obtain police protection against alleged threats from respondents. They asserted that their marriage on 16‑02‑2026 was consensual, without any FIR, and that they were being …

HALEEMUDDINversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Haleemuddin applied for a passport which was withheld because he is implicated in a criminal case under Sections 115(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. P.S. Saraimeer, Azamgarh. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decisions in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar (2023) and Rahimuddin (2025) to argue …

SWASTIK INFRATECH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Swastik Infratech and two others, challenged a one‑year debarment order issued by the Uttar Pradesh Public Works Department (PWD) after a work order for road repair was found to be substandard. They alleged that the debarment was a retaliatory act for their whistle‑blowing complaint …

SHIV KUMAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Shiv Kumar Shukla filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal complaint (Case No. 2482 of 2017) filed by Sunil Agrawal alleging offences under Sections 385 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The Allahabad High Court examined the record and held …

SONU @ ABHISHEKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sonu @ Abhishek, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 16962 of 2025) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra. The application alleged that the proceedings arising from offences under …

SACHINversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sachin, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, as well as Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act, in connection with Crime No. 69 of 2026. He claimed innocence, stating that the FIR was lodged against an unknown person …

ALOK MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Alok Mishra under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR No. 306 of 2025 alleging assault causing eye injury. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the FIR was lodged against unknown persons …

PRADEEP KUMAR SIROHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Pradepe​d Kumar Sirohi, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 585 of 2025) pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Ghaziabad. He argued that he was never arrested and that the …

SHAHANSHAH HUSAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Shahanshah Husain filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 8506 of 2026) seeking a mandamus directing the Executive Officer of Nagar Palika Parishad, Khalilabad (respondent No. 4) to pay him a security deposit of Rs. 75,000 with interest. The petitioner claimed he was entitled to the security for a shop …

RAMNARESH SAHUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ramnaresh Sahu, an agent of Loni Urban Multi State Credit and Thrift Cooperative Society, in a case involving alleged default on fixed and recurring deposits. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was already on …

SANDEEP KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar Mishra, a Chakbandi Karta appointed in 2024, sought transfer from Jaunpur to Hathras, Kannauj or Auraiyya citing his wife's illness and his elderly mother's health. He argued that the Transfer Policy permits a transfer on his own request given such intervening …

NITISH SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Nitish Sharma applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 324, 452 and 308 IPC. This was his second anticipatory bail application after an earlier one was dismissed on 08.04.2024. The applicant argued that new facts, not previously before the court, justified the …

AVUSADversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHER

The petitioner, Avusad, applied for re‑issuance of his passport which was being held up due to his involvement in a pending criminal case (Case Crime No. 0357 of 2025) under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decisions in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar v. …

VISHNUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Vishnu, was implicated in a case (Crime No.13 of 2026) alleging that he struck a motorcyclist with his car, causing simple injury, under sections 109, 115(2), 324(4) and 351(2) of the B.N.S. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, …

RAVI YADAVversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Ravi Yadav, who was implicated in a case (Crime No. 362 of 2018) involving offences under Sections 308, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The applicant argued that he was …

MUTTU ALIAS MUKESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Muttu alias Mukesh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 305(Ka) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the FIR was lodged against an unknown …

RAJESH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Rajesh Yadav, appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking to set aside a bail rejection order dated 9‑Feb‑2026 passed by the Special Judge, Jaunpur. He claimed innocence, alleged false …

SALONI YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

Saloni Yadav applied for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66-D of the Income Tax Act. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior …