Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 14201–14400

JOGINDRA SINGH PAL AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Tehsildar of Khatauli to consider their representation dated 27‑12‑2025 for issuance of English versions of Scheduled Caste certificates already granted to them. The State’s standing counsel argued that the petition should not be kept …

ASHISH KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ashish Kumar Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State Public Service Tribunal, Uttar Pradesh, to decide his pending claim petition (No. 2179 of 2024) within a time frame set by the court. The petition argued that the Tribunal had unduly delayed the disposal …

BALBEERversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 08.01.2026 and mandamus to restrain the respondent from interfering with his possession and demolishing his house at Village‑Admadpur Sadat. The respondent produced instructions from an oil company indicating that any …

PHOOLCHANDRA AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the proceedings of Criminal Case Nil of 2025, which originated from Crime No. 37 of 2025. The contention was that the cognizance order issued by the Judicial Magistrate was undated and …

MOHD LAIK AND 2 OTHERSversusMOHD JAHID

The petitioners challenged the appellate court's order dated 13.01.2026 that stayed an interim injunction granted by the trial court on 18.12.2025. The respondents argued that the injunction was being used to interfere with their possession of the disputed property, justifying the stay. The High …

ASHISH KUMAR SHARMAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Ashish Kumar Sharma applied for a passport but his application was held up because he is implicated in two criminal cases under Sections 147, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar (2023) that mere pendency of …

MANOJ KUMAR SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

Manoj Kumar Singh applied for a passport but the application was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 867 of 2013) under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner relied on the Division Bench judgment in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar v. Union of …

THE JANTA TRUCK HONORS WELFARE SOCIETYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The Janta Truck Honors Welfare Society filed a writ petition challenging a land patta that had been cancelled by an order dated 23 July 2024 in Case No. 314 of 2024. The cancellation was affirmed by the Commissioner in Appeal No. 1976 of 2024 on 5 May 2025. The petitioner argued that the …

KAMLESH KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court had earlier ordered on 15 December 2025 that the petitioner's representation be heard before deciding the matter. Respondent No.4 later claimed that a further hearing was unnecessary, asserting that the earlier hearing had already been provided, which appeared to conflict …

PRADIP KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a member of the Gram Panchayat of Sonsa in Etah district, sought to have voters of Wards 9, 13 and 15 shifted from the polling station at Uchh Prathmik Vidyalaya, Sonsa to the polling station at Janta Inter College, Parson. He filed a representation on 9 October 2025, which was …

SOHAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Soham Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the application and instead approach the Sessions Court. The court considered the request and, …

RANJEET RAJBHARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ranjeet Rajbhar, who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant pleaded innocence, …

RAMESH CHANDRA UPADHYAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Ramesh Chandra Upadhyay filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 645 of 2019, which involved alleged forgery, cheating, and criminal conspiracy under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 120B. The complainant, who was the …

VIVEK KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Vivek Kumar Singh, who was arrested in connection with a case under sections 325 of the B.N.S., sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, and section 11 of the …

NITIN BATA @ HARSH TOMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitin Bata (alias Harsh Tomar) in a murder case (Crime No.191 of 2025) involving sections 191(2), 140(1), 103(1), 238, 3(5) and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, along with others, conspired to murder the …

HARIOMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the CrPC for Hariom, who was implicated in a case involving multiple IPC offences but was not named in the FIR. The applicant argued that his name surfaced only during investigation and that there was no credible evidence …

ABHAY RAIKWARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Abhay Raikwar, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.16 of 2026) involving offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. He sought bail during the pendency of trial, arguing that a co‑accused, Rahul Gupta, with an identical role and no prior record, had already …

HARENDRA @ HARINDRA CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Harendra Chauhan, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case under Sections 87, 137(2), 64(1) of the CrPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging that the alleged victim, a 17‑year‑old girl, was his consensual partner and that they had married and she was pregnant with his …

ISHWAR CHANDRA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to restrain the respondents from demolishing a disputed parcel of land and to compel Respondent No.4 to decide the petitioners' reply filed earlier. The petitioners alleged that no decision had been taken on their reply, causing prejudice. The Court examined …

LALI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Lali Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to grant her pension, pensionary benefits, arrears and 12% interest for the services of her deceased husband. The petitioner claimed that her claim was pending before the respondents. The …

NAKUL YADAV @ ADITYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Nakul Yadav @ Aditya, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 556 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 109(1), 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. He argued that a co‑accused, Monu Pal @ Rohit, with an identical role had already been released on bail, and …

DILIP KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioner Dilip Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Settlement Consolidation Officer, Varanasi (Respondent No.2) to decide case No. 1473/2025, filed under Section 109‑Ka(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Housing (U.P.C.H.) Act, 1954, within a stipulated period. The …

RAHUL KUMAR SAHUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Rahul Kumar Sahu filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging three orders: the Additional Session Judge's dismissal of his criminal revision, the Chief Judicial Magistrate's rejection of Exhibit No. 21B, and the summoning of the petitioner under Section 138 of the …

RAVENDRA KUMAR HARIJANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Ravendra Kumar Harijan in a complaint case alleging offences under IPC sections 392, 323, 504 and 506. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior criminal record and willingness to cooperate, …

RAKESH KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought a passport but his application was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 0672 of 2020) involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 406, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in …

VIRENDRA KUMAR HARIJANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Virendra Kumar Harijan in a complaint case involving alleged offences of dacoity, assault, criminal intimidation and extortion under IPC Sections 392, 323, 504 and 506. The applicant …

MAZHAR ABBAS AND 12 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to continue regular payment of salary, service benefits, and post‑retirement dues, and to pay arrears of sixth pay with 8% interest. The court noted that the matter had already been decided by a Division Bench in Om Prakash & …

MANJEET NISHAD @ MANJEETversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Manjeet Nishad, who was arrested in a case under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 (Crime No. 618 of 2025). The applicant …

PHOOL CHANDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Phool Chandra Yadav filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking to set aside a judgment of the Sessions Judge dated 11 February 2026 in a criminal appeal under section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and an order of the Gram Nyayalaya dated 9 July …

PANNA LALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Panna Lal, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and nine other respondents. The petition sought dismissal on the ground that it was not pressed. The petitioner’s counsel, Sachin Kumar Sharma, specifically prayed for dismissal as not …

SMT JYOTIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt. Jyoti, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of Family Court‑II, Muzaffar Nagar, to decide the pending case No.1096 of 2025 (Jyoti v. Shubham Tomar) within a short, stipulated period. The High Court, after hearing counsel …

MOHD. RASHID KHANversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

A writ petition (Writ C No. 9285 of 2026) was filed by Mohd. Rashid Khan against the State of U.P. and others. The petitioner, through counsel, expressed a desire not to pursue the petition and requested its withdrawal. The respondents were represented by counsel comprising C.S.C., Punit Kumar …

SANJEEV KUMAR YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an application for anticipatory bail under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 filed by Sanjeev Kumar Yadav and Sudhir Singh, who were alleged to be involved in a criminal case (Crime No. 336 of 2023) and were …

DEENANATH VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State and other respondents to remove illegal encroachments on land registered as Ambedkar Park and pond, which belongs to the Gram Sabha as public utility land. The petitioner highlighted eight pending cases …

MITHLESH KUMAR VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Mithlesh Kumar Verma, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case alleging criminal breach of trust under Sections 303(1) and 316(3) of the B.N.S. He claimed innocence, stating that the alleged loss arose from a truck accident and subsequent …

MOHD SHAFEEK @ KALLUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Mohd Shafeek @ Kallu, who was charged under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant …

VIJAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Vijay under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 287 of 2025) involving alleged attempts to seize property using forged documents. The applicant claimed innocence and pointed out that …

MOHD AZAD QURESHI ALIAS AZAD QURESHI ALIAS BHAIJAANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Mohd Azad Qureshi, who was in custody for offences under Section 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Arms Act, Sections 3, 5A and 8 of …

SHOYEBversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Shoyeb, filed a bail application in Criminal Case No.473 of 2025, which involved charges under Sections 103(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act. The applicant was not named in the FIR; his name appeared only in the statement of a squealer, …

RAKESH VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rakesk Verma, filed Writ No. 9363 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and five other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the writ petition, stating that the petitioner wished to explore …

PHOOLMATI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Phoolmati Devi under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a case registered under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the cows were …

ROHIT SENGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Rohit Sengar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code for an alleged offence under Section 238 of the BNS, 2023. The court noted that the offence is bailable, and therefore anticipatory bail is not maintainable. The application was dismissed on the ground of …

CHHOTE LAL YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

Chhote Lal Yadav applied for bail for a case (Crime No.681 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 80(2), 85, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. This was his second bail application after a prior rejection. The applicant argued that witness statements were contradictory, …

RAJUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Raju, who was charged under sections 8 and 18 of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 490 grams of opium, a quantity below the commercial threshold. The applicant …

GYANENDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Gyanendra Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case where a supplementary charge‑sheet had been filed under Section 354‑B IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act, arising from a land dispute. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had already been granted regular bail for …

AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Ahmad, who is charged under section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant asserted that he is innocent, has no gang …

MOHITversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mohit, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed …

KAILASH AGRAHARI @ KAILASH CHANDRA DASversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Kailash Agrahari, who was charged under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant asserted that he was falsely implicated, had …

CHINTU MATHURversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Chintu Mathur, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant pleaded …

SMT MEENA KUMARI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, owners of houses along State Highway No. 21, challenged a notice dated 26‑06‑2025 issued by the fifth respondent ordering demolition of their properties to facilitate highway widening. They sought a writ of certiorari to quash the notice and a mandamus to restrain demolition. The …

AJAD ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ajad Ali applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 108, 352 and 351(4) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the alleged suicide of a deceased person. The FIR, lodged a month after the incident, did not name him but mentioned his mobile number and …

AMAR BAHADURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 315 of 2021) arising from an alleged assault, abuse, and intimidation on 3 January 2019. The applicant contended that he did not commit the offences, that the injuries …

KUNDAN KUMARversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

Kundan Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to quash a recovery notice dated 26‑06‑2025 issued by a private bank for pending EMIs and ECS bounce charges, to restrain coercive recovery proceedings, and to allow payment in instalments. The respondents argued that …

MUNNAWWARversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner sought re‑issuance of his passport, which was withheld because he is implicated in a criminal FIR (sections 506, 494, 498A IPC) pending in Kushinagar. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar (2023) that mere pendency of an FIR cannot bar …

AMAR BANSALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the CrPC for Amar Bansal, who was arrested in a narcotics case under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 20.300 kg of ganja, a quantity exceeding the commercial threshold. The applicant argued lack of …

UMESH KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Umesh Kumar and Smt. Poonam Devi, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving alleged receipt of insurance money. They claimed innocence, asserted that a co‑accused had already been granted interim anticipatory bail, and …

PARAS NATH PATEL @ PARAS NATHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Paras Nath Patel appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14‑A(1) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act seeking to quash the trial court’s cognizance order, non‑bailable warrant and charge sheet in a case that alleged offences under IPC Sections 419, 420, 406, 504 and SC/ST Act …

GUFRANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Gufran, who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant pleaded innocence, asserted …

RICHCREDIT FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITEDversusBABITA @ BABITA GUPTA

Richcredit Finance Private Limited filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Special Court (N.I. Act), Ghaziabad, to dispose of a pending complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed on 17‑08‑2023. The petitioner argued that the trial …

RICHCREDIT FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITEDversusRAJESH KUMAR GUPTA

Richcredit Finance Private Limited filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Special Court (N.I. Act) in Ghaziabad to decide a pending complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act within a specified period. The petitioner argued that the trial court was merely …

ABHIJEET SRIVASTAVAversusTHE BAR COUNCIL OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Abhijeet Srivastava, filed a writ petition after lodging a complaint against a practicing advocate with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh, which was subsequently transferred to the Bar Council of India. The petitioner objected to the advocate's response and sought the Bar Council of …

KAPIL SONAKIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Kapil Sonakiya, who alleged that he was falsely implicated in a fraud case involving a sale deed and that he was not named in the FIR. The applicant asserted his …

ARVINDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered bail application No. 9354 of 2026 filed by Arvind, who was arrested under sections 64(1) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. at Khoda police station, Ghaziabad. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, pointing to contradictions in the victim’s statements and …

MILIND SUMAN @ MILAN SUMAN @ RAX @ CHINTUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Milind Suman, who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant pleaded …

BANDANA @ BANDANA CHAUHAN AND ANOTHERversusPHOOLCHANDRA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Bandana and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Jaunpur to decide Original Suit No. 746 of 2024 within a stipulated period, alleging irreparable loss. The High Court observed that the suit has been pending …

VINOD AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a summoning order dated 23.07.2019 and subsequent non-bailable warrant orders in a private complaint case (Cr. No. 1264 of 2018) involving offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The High …

RICHCREDIT FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITEDversusRISHABH GUPTA

Richcredit Finance Private Limited filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Special Court (N.I. Act), Ghaziabad, to dispose of a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed on 17-08-2023. The petitioner argued that the trial court was …

SANTOSH PALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Santosh Pal, was arrested in connection with FIR No. 70/2025 alleging offences under Sections 74, 352, 351(3) and 69 of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed the allegations were false, motivated by personal enmity, and that the FIR was lodged with undue delay. The prosecution argued that …

DEEPAK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Deepak Kumar, who was implicated in a case under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The FIR named a co‑accused, Mohd. Ahmad, for filling LPG in a vehicle registered in …

HAR DATTA MISHRAversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

Har Datta Mishra filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge-sheet dated 13-11-2025 and related proceedings in a criminal case involving Sections 409, 120-B IPC and Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The applicant later informed the …

VIMLESH PATEL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 31‑05‑2023 issued by the trial court in a criminal case involving offences under sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 506 of the IPC. They contended that no charge had been framed against …

SAGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Subsequently, the applicant sought to withdraw that application and requested liberty to file a regular bail application before the appropriate court. The learned counsel for the respondent opposed …

KAUSHAL KISHORE RAI AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Kaushal Kishore Rai and six others, filed a writ petition seeking a subsidy of Rs 1,50,200 for a 9 HP power trailer they had purchased, claiming entitlement under the Rajya Audyogik Mission, Uttar Pradesh and the Ekikrit Bagwani Vikas Mission (Rashtriya Bagwani Mission). The central …

SMT. MANSA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Smt. Mansa Devi filed a writ petition seeking relief from the State of U.P. for its failure to decide her application filed on 13‑08‑2025 under the Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatana Kalyan Yojana after her husband’s death. The Court noted that the scheme is intended to provide social security to …

M/S H.R. CONSTRUCTION COMPANYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

M/s H.R. Construction Company, a contractor engaged in electrical distribution works, filed a writ petition seeking release of a payment of Rs.1,95,998 plus GST that it alleges the respondent authority has withheld despite multiple representations. The respondents argued that the petition need not …

RAMESH CHANDRA VAISH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 3905 of 2023, which involved offences under Sections 304A, 337 and 338 of the IPC. Earlier, a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application challenging the same order was dismissed, and the court permitted a fresh …

MULCHANDRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Mulchandra and Sunil, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR No. 13 of 2026 alleging assault with a hard blunt object and a sharp-edged weapon. They claimed innocence, asserted that no specific role was assigned to them, …

RAVI GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ravi Gupta under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a loan‑fraud case (Crime No. 356 of 2025) involving alleged receipt of brokerage and facilitation of a Rs. 32 lakh loan. The applicant claimed innocence and …

RAM UJAGIR @ MUNNU AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 1825 of 2023) and a non‑bailable warrant issued against them while they were on bail. They contended that the warrant was issued without first …

SANJAYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sanjay, filed a bail application in the Allahabad High Court. The court examined a report from the Superintendent of Police showing that the Additional District Judge/Fast Track Court in Hapur had acquitted the applicant in Sessions Trial No. 32 of 2017, which involved offences under …

JAG PRASAD AND 5 OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, claiming to be forest dwellers, sought protection under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, asserting that the land they occupy is tribal land despite being within a reserved forest. The respondents, representing the …

SUBHAGIYA AND 8 OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, claiming to be forest dwellers, sought protection under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, asserting that the land they occupy is tribal land despite being within a reserved forest. The respondents, including the …

AZAM QURAISHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Azam Quraishi sought a passport but his application was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case under several IPC offences and provisions of the SC/ST Act. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar, which held that mere pendency of a …

KASHI PRASAD DUBEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, to decide Revision No. 563/2010-2011 concerning a land mutation case that had been pending since 2010-2011. The petition alleged an inordinate delay of over fifteen years in adjudicating the …

QAMAR ALAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Qamar Alam filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared for the petitioner on the revised call. The Court dismissed the petition on the ground of want of prosecution. The judges granted the petitioner liberty to file a …

BANTU @ HARENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Bantu @ Harendra, sought anticipatory bail under the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving alleged assault under sections 191(2), 115(2), 118(1), 110 and 352. He claimed innocence, stating that the allegations were generic and that co‑accused had already been granted regular …

GAURAV KATHERIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gaurav Katheriya in Criminal Case No. 197 of 2025, which was registered under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and was only implicated on the basis of a suspect statement by the …

MOHD FARMAN @ FARMAN PRADHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mohd Farman @ Farman Pradhan under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged possession of 224.240 kg of contraband ganja under the NDPS Act. The applicant claimed innocence, citing lack of any incriminating …

SMT. SUSHILA DEVIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Sushila Devi, filed a writ petition alleging that the respondent authority had failed to issue her a character certificate despite her representations. The petitioner sought a direction for the issuance of the certificate. The respondents argued that the petition could be …

SMT RAJVANTI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Smt Rajvanti Devi, filed a transfer application under Section 447 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a criminal trial (Session Trial No. 507 of 2019) from the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.5, Varanasi to another Sessions Court in Varanasi and also requested a stay of …

BIHARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Bihari, was implicated as the owner of a vehicle from which nine live bulls were recovered, leading to charges under several sections of the B.N.S., the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and the Prevention of Animal Cruelty Act. He filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC …

SURENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Surendra Singh, who claimed innocence and alleged false implication in a fraud case. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was not a vendor, vendee, or …

BALVIR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Balvir Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 10‑10‑2025 and a notice dated 24‑02‑2026 issued by a private bank under the SARFAESI Act. The petitioner argued that the High Court could intervene in the bank's …

GUDDU URF SATYA PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Guddu Urf Satya Prakash, filed a bail application in a case involving offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act, claiming he was not named in the FIR and was falsely implicated. The State opposed bail, citing a witness statement that the applicant was the last person seen with the …

MANU DEEP SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER

The petitioner, Manu Deep Sharma, filed a writ petition (Writ No. 9310 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The court observed discrepancies in the petition and held that it was not properly pressed. Consequently, the petition was dismissed on procedural grounds. The court, however, granted the …

VIKRAM SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA, AND 4 OTHER

Vikram Singh applied for a passport which was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 314 of 2024) under Sections 324(4), 352, 115(2), 333 and 191(2) of the B.N.S, P.S. Sheeshgarh, Bareilly. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar …

DR. AMIT AKHIL AND ANOTHERversusMANATI JAISWAL

The petitioners, Dr. Amit Akhil and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the District Judge, Gorakhpur, to decide Civil Appeal No. 6 of 2025 (Manati Jaiswal v. Ganesh Pratap Singh) expeditiously. The petition argued that the appeal had been pending since 2025 and …

RAVI KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ravi Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 169 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 191(2), 103(1), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code and the B.N.S. He applied for bail, arguing that a co‑accused, Arun Prajapati, had been granted bail in a similar circumstance and …

MOHAMMAD ASAFAR @ SADDAMversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner sought renewal of his passport, which was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 353 of 2025) under several IPC sections. He relied on earlier judgments that mere pendency of a criminal case does not automatically bar passport renewal if the petitioner obtains …

MOHD AKHTAR NAMIversusMOHD. ADIL AND 6 OTHERS

The petition under Article 227 challenged the trial court's handling of an application filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. The petitioner argued that the revisional court had already remanded the matter to the trial court, leaving little for the trial court to decide, and that the petition …

SARASWATI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Saraswati Devi, who was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 119 of 2025) under Section 105 of the B.N.S. and Section 15(2)(B) of the Indian Medical Council Act. The applicant argued that she was not named in the FIR, was falsely implicated, …

MAHAVIR YADAVversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Mahavir Yadav, filed a writ petition alleging that the District Magistrate of Jaunpur had failed to issue him a character certificate despite multiple representations. The respondent State of U.P. argued that the petition could be disposed of without merits and suggested a direction …

AHMAD HASANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ahmad Hasan, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.0244 of 2023) involving charges under Sections 498-A and 304-B of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The trial is near its conclusion, with the accused's statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. …

UDIT NARAINversusVINAY KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Udit Narain, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a mandamus directing the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Muzaffar Nagar, to decide an application dated 03‑08‑2023 filed in Original Suit No. 105 of 2023. The petitioner argued that the application had remained pending …

ANAND KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Anand Kumar Singh applied for a character certificate, which was rejected by the competent authority on 06.08.2025. He filed a writ petition challenging the order, alleging it was passed without applying mind and in violation of the guidelines laid down by this Court in Anil Kumar v. State of U.P. …

SANDEEP KUMARversusDIWAKAR SINGH AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking an order directing the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal to decide Claim Petition No. 74 of 2017, which had been pending since 2017, within a specific period. The petitioner argued that the prolonged delay …

GYANENDRA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.4217 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehpur. They argued that they had not been arrested and that the charge‑sheet …

RAJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Raj Kumar filed a writ petition seeking mandamus for the grant of First and Second Assured Career Progression (ACP) after 10 and 18 years of service, correction of his grade pay to ₹2400 for 2015‑2025 and ₹2800 thereafter, and a direction to decide his representation dated 5‑Feb‑2026. The …

RAMJI VERMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ramji Verma and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash a 28 September 2012 order of the Sessions Judge, Chandauli, which had affirmed the dismissal of a release application in Crime No. 319 of 2011. After hearing, …

M/S JADAUN BROTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

M/S Jadaun Brothers filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 16‑08‑2024 issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017. The respondents contended that the petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy of filing an appeal against the adjudication order. The …

RAJJOversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Rajjo, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, who is charged under Sections 498A, 304B, 323 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for allegedly setting the deceased on fire. The applicant argued that the prosecution …

OM PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Om Prakash, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 137 of 2025 under multiple IPC sections and the B.N.S. Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that an informant had exonerated him and co‑accused, and highlighted a …

DAYARAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dayaram, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Mirzapur, to decide a pending recall application (RST/1087/2025) filed under Section 48 of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act. The petitioner argued that the authority had …

SMT GULSHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Smt Gulshan and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking relief. They later informed the court that certain documents could not be annexed and essential facts could not be pleaded, and prayed that the application be dismissed as …

PINTUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Pintu filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Level Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Mau, to consider his application and issue a Scheduled Tribe caste certificate. He had submitted a representation on 30‑12‑2025, but no decision was rendered. The respondents …

VIJAY BANSALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Vijay Bansal, sought bail in a case under the NDPS Act where 526.60 kg of ganja was recovered from a truck he allegedly was traveling in. He argued that he was merely a cleaner, not the driver or transporter, and that the statements of the vehicle owner, driver, and transporter did …

ANIL KUMARversusMAHENDRA PRASAD AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Shahar, Jaunpur to decide a pending interim injunction application (6‑C) filed in original suit No. 523/2024. The petitioner argued that the 6‑C application, filed in 2024 under Order …

KAMAL GAURAV SAHUversusSTATE OF U.P AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Kamal Gaurav Sahu filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that his arrest on 08‑02‑2026 and subsequent remand were illegal because the police failed to provide written grounds of arrest as mandated by the Constitution and Supreme Court precedent. The petition sought a writ of mandamus for …

SMT. KIRTI ALIAS SALONIversusRAHUL KUMAR

The petitioner, Smt. Kirti (Saloni), filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Moradabad, to decide her pending divorce case (Case No. 593 of 2023) filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner argued that the trial had …

SANTOSH KUMARversusSTATE BANK OF INDIA

Petitioner Santosh Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing State Bank of India to reschedule two of his loan accounts. The bank contended that a settlement had been reached in a National Lok Adalat on 14 March 2026, wherein the petitioner would pay an upfront …

CHANDRASEN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 15 OTHERS

Petitioners Chandrasen and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Azamgarh to decide Revision No. 3191 of 2024 (Esimdar v. Jamaluddin) filed under Section 48(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation (U.P.C.H.) Act. The Standing Counsel for the …

RAM CHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Ram Chandra, a senior citizen, alleged that his sons (private respondents 4 and 5) had driven him out of his house and filed a representation on 23 February 2026 with respondent No.2 seeking assistance. The court examined the petition and decided that it was not necessary to issue notice to the …

ARCHNA SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusKAMAL TOMAR

The petitioners, Archna Sharma and Pradeep Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking to set aside orders dated 25.08.2022 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate and 23.01.2026 of the Additional Session Judge in criminal matters under Sections 323, 504, and 506 …

KRISHNANAND NIRANJANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Krishnanand Niranjan filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to release his arrears of salary with interest. The petitioner claimed the salary claim was pending before the respondents. The State's standing counsel suggested that a fresh representation by the …

SMT. REKHAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Smt. Rekna, convicted in Sessions Trial No. 149 of 2017 for offences under Sections 147, 148, 307, 302/149 and 120B of the IPC, applied for bail. The High Court considered reports from the District Judge and Superintendent of Police. A supervening event occurred, rendering the bail application moot. …

SHIVRAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Shivraj Singh filed a writ petition seeking a character certificate from the Superintendent of Police, Auraiya, alleging that despite multiple representations the authority had taken no action. The State of U.P. and another respondent opposed the petition. The court, without examining the merits, …

PARVEZversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Parvez, was arrested in FIR No. 184/2025 under IPC sections 69 and 351(2) and applied for bail. He alleged that the case was false, that he was threatened by the police, and that he had not committed any offence. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the charges. The …

WAKEEL AHMAD AND ANOTHERversusAZHAR ALI

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction for the Civil Judge, Second Hapur, to decide a pending 6‑C interim injunction application in Civil Suit No. 181 of 2023 and to restrain the respondent from interfering with their peaceful possession of the land. The …

YOGESH CHAUHANversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Yogesh Chauhan sought a passport but his application was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 0161 of 2021) under Sections 147, 323, 506, 452 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar …

GOVINDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Govind, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release from four separate criminal cases by furnishing a single personal bond and two sureties. The four cases involved offences under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S. and one case under …

NAIM KHAN @ NAJAMUDDIN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Naim Khan (applicant) under Section 64(1) of the CrPC in connection with offences under Sections 123 and 351(3) of the IPC. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, pointing out inconsistencies in the FIR dates and lack of photographic or …

RAJ KAMAL PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, a police personnel, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 191(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 for allegedly assaulting a deceased army man, causing grievous injuries. The prosecution’s version held the applicant as the principal assailant, while the informant later …

PRADEEP DUBEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners, Pradeep Dubey and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an unspecified action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and six other respondents. The petitioners sought relief but later requested the court to dismiss the petition on the ground that it was …

DAYARAMDAS AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 60 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a public interest litigation seeking a mandamus directing the State to evict illegal occupants from Araji No. 1062Sa, a 31.4170‑hectare revenue land in Ghazipur, after a Tehsildar’s order of ejectment and damages (maintained in appeal under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, …

JAINATHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Kirtapur, Jaunpur (respondent No.2) to decide a stay application dated 27.01.2026, filed in Appeal No. 147/2024-25 under Section 21(2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, within a …

APV REALTY LTD.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Apv Realty Ltd., filed Writ Petition No. 10484 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of U.P. and other respondents. The petition was found to contain discrepancies that rendered it procedurally defective. The petitioner’s counsel …

HIMANSHU CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P.

Himanshu Chaudhary applied for bail in a criminal case (No.330 of 2025) under Section 103(1) B.N.S. while the trial was pending. He had been in custody since 17 November 2025 and argued that a co‑accused, Anku @ Ankush Kumar, had been granted bail in a similar circumstance, establishing a claim of …

ANIL KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, owners of a settlement in Ashdullapur village outside the Nagar Nigam limits, filed a writ petition fearing demolition of their structures by the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA). They sought a mandamus directing the Authority not to demolish or harass them and to …

RATI SHUKLAversusPUNIT KUMAR CHAUBEY

The petition was filed by Rati Shukla under Article 227 of the Constitution. The petitioner, through counsel, informed the court that she no longer wishes to press the petition. The court examined whether a petition can be dismissed solely on the ground that it is not pressed by the petitioner. No …

ASHISH KUMAR SETHversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. HOME AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Ashish Kumar Seth, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf on the scheduled date and no adjournment was sought. The court held that the cause of action had become stale due to the petitioner’s failure to prosecute the petition. …

M/S RIYA CONSTRUCTION AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Riya Construction & others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to decide an application filed on 3 February 2026 and to ensure payment of the amount claimed. The petitioner alleged that despite filing the application, no decision had been taken, causing …

RAM BAHADUR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ram Bahadur and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings initiated against them in a private complaint case involving offences under IPC sections 354-A, 323, 504 and 506. The High Court examined the …

VEENA SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Veena Singh, filed a writ petition alleging that her bank account was frozen after a Rs.10,000 online fraud transaction, reported by Coimbatore Police, was credited to her account. She claimed ignorance of how the amount was deposited and sought relief to access her funds. The court …

SMT. MEENAversusSMT. KAUSHIDA AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Meena, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Kairana, District Shamli, to decide a pending interim injunction application (6C application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of the CPC) that had been pending since 2025. The …

SHYAMU YADAVversusPREM AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shyamu Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chandauli, to decide a pending interim injunction application (6C) filed in Original Suit No. 209 of 2023. The petitioner argued that despite several dates being fixed, the …

ALOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Alok Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Chief Engineer of Harduaganj Thermal Power Station to decide his application for earned leave dated 15 July 2025. The petitioner alleged that the application had not been acted upon, causing undue delay. The respondents …

SANIYA PARVEEN @ NISHA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants, Saniya Parveen @ Nisha and Kamar Jahan, were arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 374 of 2025) and sought bail during the pendency of trial. The prosecution alleged that they participated in the assault and murder of Noor Mohammad, but the applicants claimed …

HARGOVINDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Hargovind, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. After hearing the parties, counsel for the petitioner requested that the petition be dismissed on the ground that it was not pressed. The Court …

RAMESH YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by Ramesh Yadav and another seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 294 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ballia, which involved charges …

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ashok Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State respondents to pay compensation for his land that became unusable after being submerged by the Chaudhary Charan Singh Rasin Dam. He also asked the court to order the respondents to decide his compensation …

RANJIT SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusDHIRENDRA KUMAR SHARMA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Prayagraj to decide a pending suit and an interim injunction application (6C) filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of the CPC, and to maintain status quo until the decision. The petitioners argued that …

M/S RUPA TRADERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

M/S Rupa Traders filed a writ petition challenging two ex‑parte adjudication orders dated 22‑04‑2024 and 03‑02‑2023 that were passed under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The respondents argued that the petitioner had a statutory right to appeal the adjudication …

BAKE SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Bake Singh, filed a public interest litigation under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State respondent to enforce a City Magistrate's order dated 11‑11‑2025 that ordered removal of an illegal encroachment on road land (Gata Nos.161/162/163). The State, through its …

KRISHNA DEV (SINCE DECEASED) AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Consolidation Officer of Kirtapur, Jaunpur, to decide the pending case Rest/312 (Ramkesh Vs. Phoolpatti) under Section 9A(2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 within a reasonable time. The standing counsel for the …

BABLUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Bablu, filed a second bail application in a trial concerning offences under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He argued that only one witness had been examined since the first bail plea was rejected and asserted his willingness to cooperate …

MEHI LAL YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

Mehi Lal Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 534 of 2025) under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he was falsely implicated and that the alleged homicide was actually an accidental injury. He argued that he was not driving the car that struck the …

KHYALI SINGHversusU.P. STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD AND 4 OTHERS

Khyali Singh, a former Class IV employee of U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd, retired on 30 June 2011 and contended that the corporation released his retiral dues in a lesser amount than mandated by law, citing a letter dated 20 September 2024 that reduced payments and denied certain heads. He …

NOORJAHAN KHATUNversusUNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, mother of a railway accident victim, challenged the Railway Accident Claims Tribunal's order that only Rs. 80,000 of the Rs. 8,00,000 compensation be released immediately, with the balance to be kept in a fixed deposit for three years. She argued that the amount was inequitable and …

RAMA SHANKARversusU.P. STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD AND 4 OTHERS

Rama Shankar, a former Class IV employee of U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd who retired on 31 July 2010, challenged a letter dated 15 January 2025 that reduced his post‑retirement payments and denied certain heads of dues. He claimed that the corporation calculated his gratuity, EPF, salary …

CHINKAN AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, parents of a son who died in a railway accident on 03‑06‑2010, obtained a compensation award of Rs 8,00,000 from the Railway Accident Claims Tribunal on 30‑05‑2024, but the Tribunal ordered that only Rs 80,000 be released immediately with the balance kept in a fixed deposit for …

AJAY KUMAR CHAURASIYAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Chaurasiya, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Allahabad High Court against the Union of India and four other respondents. The petition sought relief on unspecified grounds. During the hearing, the petitioner's own counsel, Ashish Kumar Ojha, submitted that the …

SMT. SUMAN DEVIversusU.P. STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD. AND 4 OTHERS

Smt. Suman Devi filed a writ petition seeking to quash a letter dated 24‑10‑2024 that reduced the post‑retirement dues of her husband, a former Class IV employee of U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd., and to compel the corporation to pay the full gratuity, EPF, salary arrears, leave encashment, …

KALLUversusU.P. STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD AND 4 OTHERS

Kallu, a former Class IV employee of U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd, retired on 31 May 2014 and alleges that the corporation released a lower quantum of his post‑retirement dues without considering his objection or granting a hearing. He filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash the …

SMT. SHANTIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Shanti, challenged the Railway Accident Claims Tribunal's order that only Rs. 80,000 of the Rs. 8,00,000 compensation awarded for the death of her son be released immediately, with the balance placed in a fixed deposit for three years. She argued that the partial release was …

DINESH KUMAR PATELversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner suffered a leg amputation in a railway accident on 31‑01‑2020 and filed a claim on 29‑06‑2021. The Railway Accident Claims Tribunal awarded a compensation of ₹3,20,000 on 23‑02‑2026 but ordered that only ₹32,000 be released immediately, with the balance to be kept in a fixed deposit …

SMT. USHA DEVI AND 3 OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, the widow and three daughters of a railway accident victim, challenged the Railway Accident Claims Tribunal's order that only Rs. 80,000 of the Rs. 8,00,000 compensation award be released immediately, with the balance placed in a three‑year fixed deposit. They argued that the …

SMT KIRAN AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioners challenged the Railway Accident Claims Tribunal's order that released only Rs.40,000 of a Rs.4,00,000 compensation award for the death of the husband/father in a 2019 railway accident, arguing it was inequitable. The Tribunal had directed the balance to be kept in a fixed deposit for …

VINAY YADAVversusSTATE OF UP AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vinay Yadav, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a matter against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. After hearing arguments from both sides, the counsel for the petitioner requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The Court examined …

KAUSHAL KUMAR GAUTAMversusSANJAY AND 12 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kaushal Kumar Gautam, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the First Additional Civil Judge (Jr.D.) at Kasya, Kushinagar to decide a pending application under Order 9 Rule 13 of the CPC (Misc. case No. 44/2018) arising from original suit No. 748/2003 (Ram …

FACTORY OWNERS ASSOCIATION AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The Factory Owners Association and four others filed a public interest litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State to halt construction of a Rail Over Bridge on government land in the Nunhai Industrial Estate, Agra, and to shift the project elsewhere. The …

VIVEK PARASHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Bareilly, to hear and decide his divorce petition (No. 266/2025) filed under Section 13‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that the …

HARISH CHANDRA RAMKALI CHARITABLE TRUSTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Harish Chandra Ramkali Charitable Trust, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate/Additional Collector (L.A.) in Ghaziabad to decide L.A.R. No. 18 of 2021 (Raj Kumar Paliwal v. State of U.P. & Others) under Section 64 of the Land …

VINOD KUMAR ALIAS PAPPUversusSHIV SHANKAR AND 11 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vinod Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge, S.D. Ist District Jaunpur, to decide Miscellaneous Case No. 99 of 2024 (Vinod Kumar v. Shiv Shankar) expeditiously. The petitioner argued that the case had been pending since 2024 …

SMT. SAVITRI DEVIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

Smt. Savitri Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the removal of 33 KV and 11 KV electricity cables from her land in Babhnauli, Kushinagar, and ordering the Executive Engineer to decide a representation she had filed on 30‑12‑2025. The petitioner alleged that no decision had been …

RAJA BABUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner challenged the authority's order rejecting his application for a character certificate, alleging that the order was passed without applying the mind and ignored the guidelines laid down by this Court in Anil Kumar v. State of U.P. (Writ‑C No.718 of 2025). The respondents argued that a …

AKASH SAINIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Akash Saini, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 229 of 2025) alleging false implication. He argued that the FIR was filed more than a day after the alleged incident and that he was first mentioned only in a delayed statement by a relative of the informant. No other evidence …

SEETA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 08.02.2026 and a writ of mandamus to restrain their arrest. The FIR alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and described a violent brawl resulting in grievous injuries. The Court examined the scope of its power under …

PRABHA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Prabha Devi, who was accused in a case of alleged homicide under Sections 85, 80(2) of the CrPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant, the mother‑in‑law of the deceased, argued that the death was a suicide by hanging and that there were …

GYANANDRA ORATAP MAURYAversusBAIJNATH AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gyanandra Oratap Maurya, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the district judiciary to expedite the disposal of an original civil suit (No. 528 of 2003) pending before the Civil Judge (J.D) at F.T.C Jaunpur. The suit, initiated in 2003, had seen multiple dates …

VISHWANATHversusRAMOO AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Baberu, District Banda, to decide a pending interim injunction application filed on 13 November 2024 in Original Suit No. 163/2024. The petitioner argued that despite several dates …

AMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Aman, the brother-in-law of a deceased woman, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 498A, 304B of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the allegations against him were false, that the post‑mortem indicated death by hanging, …

BALRAM PRAJAPATIversusRAM PYARI AND ANOTHER

Balram Prajapati filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a mandamus directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No.10, Deoria, to decide an objection filed on 19-10-2019 and the related interim injunction application in Original Suit No.1687 of 2019. The petitioner argued that the …

RAM NARESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Naresh Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing police authorities to decide his representation. The petition alleged that the investigation had led to a charge-sheet and cognizance taken by the trial court, and that the …

VIDYA DEVIversusREKHA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner Vidya Devi filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.), Agra, to decide a pending suit (OS No. 852/2024) expeditiously. The High Court examined the request and noted that the suit had been pending since 2024 with several dates fixed. Relying …

DEEPAK RAIDASversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Deepak Raidas, was arrested under sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the B.N.S. Act and sections 5 and 6 of the Poxos Act in connection with an alleged love‑affair‑related offence. He contended that the accusation was false, that both he and the alleged victim are adults who love each …

RAHUL JAINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rahul Jain under Section 69 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, asserting that the FIR admitted a consensual relationship and that the victim, a married woman, could not enter into a valid marriage, rendering the …

VIRENDRA PASWAN @ VIRENDRA RAM AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA

The petitioners, parents of a son who died in a railway accident on 10‑08‑2018, challenged the Railway Accident Claims Tribunal's order that released only Rs. 80,000 of the Rs. 8,00,000 compensation awarded, directing the balance to be kept in a fixed deposit for three years. They argued that the …

SMT ANJALI BIND AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, an unmarried couple living together in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection. The petitioners alleged harassment by family members and …

UPADHYA SINGH AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA

The petitioners, parents of a son who died in a railway accident on 13.01.2015, challenged the Railway Accident Claims Tribunal's award that released only Rs 80,000 of the Rs 8,00,000 compensation, with the balance to be kept in a fixed deposit for three years. They argued that the limited immediate …

SACHCHIDANAND YADAV @ LALDHAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sachchidanand Yadav, was arrested in a murder case alleging that he, along with co‑accused, brutally assaulted and killed the informant’s son with an axe on 29‑08‑2025. He filed a bail application, contending that the FIR was delayed by over five hours, the injuries did not match the …

MONU SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a street vendor, applied for a vending shop under Section 3 of the Street Vending Act, 2014, in Noida but the Noida Authority failed to issue a license despite completing surveys. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking relief. The respondents argued that the Tribunal meant to …

MANISH GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Manish Gupta filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 15767 of 2024) filed against him under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court examined the record and observed that the existence of an offence against the …

SUSHIL KUMAR MALVIYA AND 8 OTHERSversusSHARDA PRASAD AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a petition under Article 227 challenging the dismissal of their application filed under Order XLI Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the order was appealable under Order XLIII Rule 1(t) of the CPC. The Court examined …

JAI PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jai Prakash, filed a writ petition seeking allotment of 6% developed abadi land from his acquired land in Gautam Budh Nagar. The petition alleged entitlement to specific parcels of land measured in hectares. The Court observed that the matter required a factual enquiry and declined …