Petitioner No.1 was arrested on 08.02.2026 by the police without being furnished written grounds of arrest, contrary to Supreme Court pronouncements. The arrest memo and the subsequent remand order were prepared on a printed proforma, indicating a mechanical exercise of power. The petitioners …
The applicant, Pawan Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Additional Session Judge in a criminal case (Sections 363, 366, 504 IPC). He argued that the warrant was issued without first …
The petitioner, Hriday Narayan Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a character certificate from the District Magistrate, District Mau, alleging that despite multiple representations, the authority had taken no action. The respondent authorities contended that the petition could be disposed of …
Petitioners M.M. Industries and Smt. Meenu Bansal filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the respondent bank to reconsider an OTS (One Time Settlement) proposal dated 11‑09‑2025 and to restrain the bank from taking any coercive action against them. The bank contended …
The applicant, Gagan Singh Thapa, sought bail in a criminal case (Mu. A. No. 36/2026) under Section 69 of the B.N.S., alleging that the FIR was lodged belatedly and was based on false accusations of sexual relations and non‑marriage. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the alleged acts were …
The applicant, Adil, filed a bail application in the Allahabad High Court seeking release on bail in a case registered as MU‑A‑110/2025 under Section 69 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the applicant had committed a sexual offence, relying on the complainant’s statements and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhishek Singh, who was charged under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant argued that the post‑mortem report showed death by antemortem hanging and that the facts disclosed in the FIR did not satisfy the …
The applicant, Sonu, filed a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 9428 of 2026) in the High Court of Allahabad seeking release on bail in Crime No. 549 of 2025, which is registered under Section 103(1) of the B.N.S. at Police Station Phase-2, Noida. The sole accused contended that …
Petitioner Parvej Alam filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction for the early disposal of his family law case (Case No. 290 of 2024) pending before the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Ballia. The petitioner argued that the case had been pending since 2024 …
Kallu Singh, who has been in custody since 13 January 2026, applied for bail in connection with offences under Sections 74, 64(1) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The State opposed the bail, alleging that the applicant was involved in the alleged offences and might tamper with evidence. The …
The petitioners, represented by counsel Anshu Chaudhary, filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.I.) Kasya of District Kushinagar to expedite the disposal of Original Suit No. 1552/1998 (Ambika Singh v. Phool Kunwar). The petition alleged that the original suit was …
The petitioner, Brijkishor Kushwaha, applied for re‑issuance of his passport which was withheld because he is implicated in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 36 of 2022) under IPC sections 147, 323, 504 and 506. He relied on the Division Bench judgment in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar v. Union of India, arguing …
The petitioners, four Anganwadi Sahaikas, applied in 2021 for promotion to Anganwadi Karyakarti based on a government order dated 29.01.2021 that required only a high school qualification. The selection process was not completed, and a later government order dated 21.03.2023 raised the qualification …
The Committee of Management of Shri Gangadeen Dwivedi Sanskrit Uchchatar Madhyamik Vidyalaya, a grant‑in‑aid Sanskrit school, had its state aid and recognition cancelled in 2009 due to alleged infrastructural deficiencies and lack of clear property description. Earlier High Court orders quashed the …
The petitioners, a contractor firm, deposited a refundable registration fee of Rs.1,51,000 as an FDR for registration as an Army Service Corps contractor. After failing to secure any contract for three consecutive years, they were removed from the approved contractor list under Para 19(c)(iv) of a …
M/s Gagan Ent Udyog filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17142 of 2012 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, informed the Court that it does not wish to contest the proceedings. The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the petition is not being …
M/s Gagan Ent Udyog filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17206 of 2012 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, later informed the court that it did not wish to contest the case. The court examined the petitioner's request to withdraw the proceedings. Since the …
Jagdeesh Chandra Sharma filed a first appeal against the order dated No. 949 of 2019. No parties appeared before the court. The High Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have been in force. The order was pronounced by Justice Piyush Agrawal in the …
The appellant, Smt. Indra Devi, filed a second appeal (Defective No. 347 of 2021) against Senior Divisional Manager of India Life Insurance Corporation. The appeal was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant to press the appeal. The …
The applicant, Rama Rao, filed an anticipatory bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 33649 of 2019) in connection with Crime No. 197 of 2017, wherein he was charged under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant sought that, if arrested, he be released on bail. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pankaj @ Shankar, who is accused in Crime No. 740 of 2021 for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that no specific role was assigned to him, and …
The appellant Satyapal filed a criminal appeal (Defective No. 146 of 2010) before the Allahabad High Court. While the case was listed, the appellant died, as confirmed by a letter from the Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 16-10-2025. No legal heirs filed any application to continue the appeal on his …
Petitioner Toulan Gupta filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Handia, Prayagraj, to decide a representation dated 16 May 2023 filed under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that Section 24(3) mandates that such …
The appellant, Gopal Singh, failed to appear before the High Court even after a revised call. Consequently, the court dismissed the special appeal on the ground of want of prosecution. The judges, Atul Sreedharan and Siddharth Nandan, granted the appellant liberty to file a restoration application …
The appellant, Gorakh Singh, failed to appear before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad even after a revised call. Consequently, the court dismissed the special appeal on the ground of want of prosecution. The judges, Atul Sreedharan and Siddharth Nandan, granted the appellant liberty to file …
Anil was arrested in connection with alleged sexual offences against a 3‑4‑year‑old child, originally charged under Section 354(Ka) IPC and Section 10 of the POCSO Act, later amended to include Section 376AB IPC and Sections 5(m)/6 of the POCSO Act. The victim's medico‑legal report dated 28‑02‑2022 …
The applicant, Ankit @ Sarvesh, filed a second criminal bail application (No. 36546 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The court noted that this was the second bail application, …
The appellant, Satyendra Singh, filed a first appeal against the order dated 1246 of 2015. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the appellant during the hearing. The court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution, finding that the appellant had failed to pursue the matter. Consequently, any …
The petitioners, C/M Cutting Memorial Inter College and another, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 26266 of 2016) against the State of U.P. and seven other respondents. The petition was being pursued before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. During the hearing, Shri Saurabh Tripathi, junior …
The Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Service Selection Commission advertised 39 cartographer posts and conducted a two‑stage selection comprising a screening test followed by an interview. The petitioner cleared the screening with a high quality‑point score of 83.97 but scored only 8 marks in the …
The applicant, Jitendra alias Gunga, a deaf and mute person, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.254 of 2024) where he was not named in the FIR and was implicated solely on suspicion related to blood‑stained clothes. The applicant argued his innocence, lack of prior criminal record, and the …
The appellant, Suryamani Pandey, filed a first appeal against an order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. No parties appeared before the court on the scheduled date. The court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution, indicating that the appellant failed to pursue the matter. …
M/s J.J. Construction Company and another filed writ petition No. 35368 of 2011 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. The petitioners failed to appear before the Court even after a revised call. The Court observed that the petition was not being prosecuted. Consequently, the …
Smt. Suman and two others filed a first appeal (No. 593 of 2022) before the Allahabad High Court against Vinesh Verma and two others. No parties appeared before the court on the scheduled date. The court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution, finding that the appellant had not pursued the …
Ashok Kumar Jaiswal filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf, while counsel for the respondents were present. The Court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time or the petitioner's lack of interest. Consequently, the …
The appellants failed to appear before the High Court even after a revised call. Consequently, the court dismissed the special appeal for want of prosecution. The judges, however, granted the appellants liberty to file a restoration application within one month if they wish. No substantive merits of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order dated 07.05.2019 and the entire criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 5597 of 2018) relating to offences under Sections 323, 324, 354, 354B and 452 of the IPC. Both parties …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for the hearing and did not seek any adjournment. The respondents were represented. The court observed that the cause of action had become stale due to the petitioners' non‑appearance, rendering the petition …
Petitioner Smt. Nasreen Kausar filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 74227 of 2011) before the Allahabad High Court. Neither the petitioner nor her counsel appeared for the hearing, though the State's standing counsel was present. The court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the …
Smt. Katori Devi (deceased) and another appealed against an order defective No. 58 of 2013 passed against M/s Jain Transport Corp. and another. The appeal was listed but no party appeared before the court. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution and vacated any …
The petitioner Vijay Soni, who had died, filed applications for substitution of his legal representatives and for condonation of delay in filing those applications. The court examined the affidavits supporting the substitution and delay condonation and found sufficient cause to excuse the delay. …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. The petitioners failed to appear even after the revised call. The Court observed that the petition was not being prosecuted and therefore dismissed it for want of prosecution. However, the …
The applicant, Akhilesh Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 307 of 2017) involving charges under Section 376 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant sought bail in the event of arrest. The learned Additional Government Advocate informed …
The appellant, Sarvendra, filed a criminal appeal (No. 5050 of 2015) against the State of U.P. While the appeal was pending, an office report dated 02-02-2018, based on a report from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Firozabad, confirmed that the appellant had died. The High Court, after taking note of …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an ex‑parte order dated 10 October 2017 passed by the Additional Session Judge, which had allowed the opposite party, Smt. Gulnaj Bano, to reside in a house. The order arose from an appeal against an …
The applicant, Jahid Urf Jahanain, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 370 of 2021) involving offences under Sections 364, 302, 201, 394 and 411 of the IPC. He claimed innocence, argued that his four‑year pre‑trial detention violated his Article 21 rights, and asserted that he …
Moti Lal Dwivedi appealed against United Indian Insurance Company Ltd. and others before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel or parties appeared before the court. The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution, and any interim order that had been passed was vacated. The judgment was delivered by …
The applicants and the State entered into a compromise concerning criminal case No. 6186 of 2016, which involved offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The compromise was verified by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on 21‑01‑2026, and both parties and the A.G.A. raised no …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Judicial Magistrate) in Moradabad to conclude Criminal Case No. 254 of 2013 (State vs. Sandeep Khanna) expeditiously. The applicant argued that the trial was pending …
The applicant, accused under Section 302 IPC for allegedly throttling his son to death, filed a second bail application after being in custody for over four and a half years. He claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was delayed by fifteen hours, and contended that the informant’s testimony did not …
The petition (Writ No. 37629 of 2011) filed by Rahmat Fruit Centre against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others sought relief, but no counsel appeared for the petitioner. The respondent’s counsel informed the court that a later writ petition (No. 5874 of 2022) had already been decided, rendering …
The revision petition was filed by Mukesh Tyagi and others under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2015, challenging an order dated 16 August 2022 that granted accommodation and maintenance to the complainant. The petitioners contended that they had not received the …
The applicant Ranjeet filed a second criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 45736 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The court noted that this was the second bail application, …
The applicant filed a second criminal bail application in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear before the court despite being listed. The counsel for the applicant also did not appear to argue the application. The court observed that the applicant seemed uninterested in pursuing the bail. …
Rekha Rani and another filed a first appeal before the Allahabad High Court against Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. and others. No parties appeared before the court. The court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have been in force. The order was …
The petitioners, Mohammad Yamin and others, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The petitioners failed to appear even after a revised call was issued. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of want of prosecution. The Court, however, …
The petitioner, Janmejay Singh, claimed to be engaged as a PRD Jawan under the U.P. Provisional Guard/Development Cops Rules and sought a court order directing the State to deploy him despite two pending criminal cases—one under the Prevention of Corruption Act and another under the NDPS Act. He …
The applicant, Kunal @ Monti, filed a third anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 458 of 2017) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 376 and 504 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The application sought that, if arrested, the applicant be released on bail. The High Court …
The revisionist, Mohammad Shamshir Khan, challenged a family court order dated 20 October 2016 that awarded Rs 10,000 per month as maintenance, claiming it was ex parte and beyond his means. He also contested the family court’s dismissal of his application under Section 126(2) Cr.P.C. on 24 …
Rakesh Kumar Gupta filed a first appeal against Order Defective No. 1350 of 2019 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The matter was listed on March 19, 2026, but no parties or counsel appeared before the bench. The court noted the absence of prosecution and consequently dismissed the …
Awadhesh Ahirwar was arrested in connection with Crime No. 89 of 2024, charged under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 302/34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. He had been in custody since 17 May 2024, amounting to about one year and ten months, and claimed he was falsely implicated. The …
The applicant, Virendra, filed a third anticipatory bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 53880 of 2019, seeking release on bail if arrested in a case (Crime No. 803 of 2017) under Sections 304 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The application was filed before the High Court of …
The applicant, Sanju @ Jhandu, filed a second anticipatory bail application in a case under IPC Section 376 and POCSO Sections 5 and 6, seeking release on bail if arrested. The first bail application had already been rejected by the same court on merits. No counsel appeared for the applicant, while …
Ankit Gangwar applied for bail before the Allahabad High Court, filing a second bail application after his first was dismissed. No counsel appeared on his behalf, while the State's learned AGA was present. The court noted that this was a repeat application and that the prosecution had not …
The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 3578 of 2019) relating to offences under Sections 419, 420, 467 and 468 IPC. Both the applicants and the second opposite party had amicably settled the dispute and the latter expressed no desire to …
The petitioner challenged a civil judge's order that allowed the defendant to amend his written statement six and a half years after filing it, adding a limitation defence and a claim of adverse possession. The petitioner argued that the delay should bar the amendment and that the amendment would …
The applicant, Sanjay Chhawara, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. The applicant's counsel was Bed Kant Mishra, while the respondents were represented by G.A., Surendra Kumar, and Virendra Singh Yadav. The …
The applicant, Sher Khan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking relief. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Ram Kumar Dubey, indicated that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the matter, stating that the application had become infructuous. …
The applicant, a minor, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 12‑April‑2024 passed in Criminal Case No. 92 of 2024. The order concerned a direction under Section 156(3) CrPC issued by the Circle Officer, Harsh Pandey. During the …
The revision petition was filed by Abhishek, a Class‑1 GST/customs officer, challenging a Family Court order dated 23‑04‑2024 that awarded Rs 15,000 as maintenance to the wife (Opposite Party 2) and Rs 6,000 to the minor son (Opposite Party 3). The petitioner contended that the awarded amount was …
The applicant Nadeem filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.78 of 2025) involving offences under the B.N.S., POCSO Act and SC/ST Act. The prosecution alleged that the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S. were contradictory, with one indicating voluntary travel …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shanu, who is charged under IPC sections 363, 343, 376, 366 and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing away the informant's sister and committing serious offences. The applicant argued that the alleged victim, a consenting …
The applicant, Gulam Sabir Azad, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Counsel for both parties appeared before the High Court, Allahabad. The court, at the request of the applicant's counsel, listed the matter afresh for 10 July 2026. An earlier interim order was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of charge sheet No.31/2024 relating to offences under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the Court’s Mediation Centre, which …
The revisionist Smt. Anam Zafar Shamsi filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the CrPC challenging the Family Court's dismissal of her maintenance application. She alleged that the Family Court ignored the substantial income of the opposite party No.2, who runs two shops in Pilibhit, and …
Bhagwan Das filed a criminal revision challenging the trial court’s order granting Rs 3,000 per month maintenance and a Rs 5,00,000 one‑time compensation to his wife under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and the appellate court’s affirmation of the same. The revisionist …
The applicant, Mr. Pankaj Prasad, filed an arbitration application under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve a dispute with Ms. Prateek Realtors India Private Limited. The court recorded the consent of former Judge Justice …
The accused Lokesh applied for enlargement of bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 361 of 2024) involving alleged assault with a hard object causing injuries to Rakesh and Munesh. The applicant argued that the FIR and victim statements did not assign him a specific role in the assault and that the …
Smt. Kumud Sawaika filed an application under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve a dispute with Reliance Nippon Life Insurance Company Limited and two other respondents. The High Court examined whether the proposed …
The applicant, Smt. Anuradha, filed a Section 528 application seeking to set aside a summoning order issued in a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act concerning a dishonoured cheque of Rs. 5 lakh. She alleged that she never borrowed money from the opposite party, …
Shahnawaz filed Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 29178 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and three others. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel submitted that the applicant had already been acquitted in the underlying case, rendering the bail application …
Sindhu Saran appealed the Family Court's order granting his wife Rs 5,000 and his daughter Rs 3,000 per month as maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. He argued that he is a labourer with limited earnings and that the court’s finding of his income was vague and unsupported, making the total award of …
Alok Vishwakarma filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. While the petition was pending, a final order in the underlying matter was passed. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the final order …
The applicant, Bal Krishna Gupta, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party had not paid his salary arrears and retiral dues. The court examined a personal affidavit filed in a related case (Contempt Application No.2193 of 2025) which stated that the outstanding dues were fully …
The applicant, Karan Rathore, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 480 of 2023) instituted under IPC sections 323, 328, 504 and 506. The applicant had deposited Rs. 15.50 lakhs as directed by the court, part of which …
Anil Singh, arrested on 27 July 2023 and charged under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 120B, the Criminal Law Amendment Act and the Arms Act, applied for an enlargement of bail. His first bail application was rejected on 1 July 2024. In the second application the court noted that Singh is a …
The petitioners, Rajveer and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus to compel the State of U.P. and district authorities to correct land revenue records in accordance with an order dated 05.07.2016 under Section 9A(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act and …
The High Court of Allahabad considered bail application No. 29149 of 2025 filed by Sunil Rajbhar, who is accused in Crime No. 268 of 2025 under sections 74, 351(2), 70(2) of the B.N.S., sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act and section 67 of the Income Tax Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, citing that …
The applicants, including an advocate and his family members (two minors), filed a Section 482 application to quash Complaint No. 2731/2022 alleging that the neighbour‑complainant fabricated allegations of assault and molestation. The Judicial Magistrate had summoned the applicants under IPC 354, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Mau to decide a pending case (No. 0755 of 2023) under Section 11(1) of the U.P. Consolidation (CH) Act, 1953, and to do so expeditiously. The respondent’s standing counsel raised no objection …
The petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State respondents to remove alleged illegal encroachment on pond land in Jaunpur and to act as per an apex court direction. The State, through its standing counsel, objected, contending that …
Sachin, the applicant, was arrested in connection with Crime No.98 of 2025 and has been in custody since 27 May 2025. He faces charges under sections 331(6), 351(2), 115(2), 70(2) of the B.N.S. and sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that the informant’s and victim’s statements …
The appellants, Smt. Seema Chaudhary and another, appealed against a summoning order and criminal proceedings under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC sections. The respondents, who were tenants in the appellants' shop, defaulted on rent, prompting the appellants to file a …
The applicant, Bittu, was arrested in connection with the death of his wife, who allegedly committed suicide by hanging within 11 months of their marriage, which was arranged under a government scheme. The prosecution alleged that Bittu tortured the deceased to extort money and a motorcycle, but the …
The appellants, Balak Chand Bind and two others, appealed a trial court order that summoned them under Section 319 CrPC based on an application under Section 44(Kha). The trial court had relied on the statement of PW‑1, Pappu, who admitted he was not present at the incident, to justify the summons. …
Anand Gupta filed a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 30552 of 2025) after being detained since 19 July 2025 in connection with Crime No. 268 of 2025, which alleges offences under Sections 74, 351(2), 70(2) of the B.N.S., Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act and Section 67 of the …
Bachcha Lal, employed as a daily‑wage gardener at the Rajkiya Paudhshala in Kaushambi from 1 January 2008 to 30 November 2011, was terminated on 1 December 2011 without notice. The Labour Court declared the termination illegal, reinstated him and awarded back wages on 26 March 2021. The State …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Atendra, who is accused under Sections 498A, 304B, 323 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in connection with the death of his wife, alleged to be a suicide. The applicant’s counsel argued that the allegations were false, …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Gupta, filed a criminal revision (No. 5335 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, his counsel, Lal Chandra Mishra, informed the court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the revision. The court, taking note of this statement, dismissed …
The revisionist Rajat Agarwal filed a revision challenging an order dated 17.05.2025 passed by the Rent Tribunal/Additional District & Session Judge in Civil Appeal No. 96 of 2021. The respondent raised a preliminary objection that, according to the Allahabad High Court’s decision in Jupiter Chit …
Faraz Khan filed a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31421 of 2025) in Criminal Case No. 103 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. The trial of the case had already been concluded and the applicant had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 24‑04‑2018 and related criminal proceedings for offences under Sections 323, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 IPC, on the ground that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was …
M/s Gpt Infra Projects Ltd filed an arbitration application under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking the appointment of an arbitrator against the Union of India and another party. The court examined the consent given by former High Court Judge Justice Bharati Sapru …
The petitioner, a former Sub‑Registrar who superannuated on 31‑07‑2022, claimed that despite being senior (Sl. No.145) he was denied promotion to Assistant Inspector General (Registration)/Assistant Stamp Commissioner, while juniors were promoted. He alleged violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a chargesheet and cognizance order in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506, 452, 427, 325 and 308 IPC. The parties had reached a compromise, which was verified by the Additional Civil …
Sunehri Singh appealed to the Allahabad High Court against a Family Court order directing him to pay Rs 5,000 per month as maintenance for his two minor daughters under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He contended that the amount was excessive, asserting that his income from tuition work …
The applicant, Asif Ali, filed a supplementary affidavit on 4 November 2025 in the High Court of Allahabad. The court directed the registry to locate the affidavit and place it on record. The registry reported that no such affidavit was found in the records. The applicant’s counsel requested …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 24‑12‑2020 and the charge sheet dated 28‑01‑2018 in a case involving offences under Sections 324, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties had entered into a compromise on 07‑09‑2024, which was …
The applicants, Sudhakar and four others, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.1518 of 2025) arising from FIR No.282 of 2024 that alleged offences under sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 324(4) and 191(2) of the BNS Act. They contended that the FIR …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 18.05.2018 and related criminal proceedings (Case No.7641 of 2018) involving offences under Sections 323, 504 and 325 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No.1862 of 2025, which arose from Crime No.279 of 2024 and was filed under Sections 318(4), 332(C) and 351(2) of the BNSS. Both parties jointly submitted that they had entered into a compromise, which was …
The wife filed a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 alleging physical, mental and economic abuse and sought interim maintenance under Section 23. The trial court granted modest interim maintenance, which was partially modified by the District & …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No.21 of 2017 (State vs. Iqbal and others), which involved offences under Sections 406, 452, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The parties had already reached a compromise, which was verified by …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 23‑12‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 12‑09‑2025 in State v. Nizam & others (Case No. 6678 of 2025), which involved offences under Sections 74, 352, 115(2), 126(2), 131 and …
The petitioner, an Honorary Platoon Commander of the Uttar Pradesh Home Guard, challenged the cancellation of his appointment after a charge‑sheet was filed against him under IPC sections 342, 294, 323 and 34. The cancellation was based on a Government Order dated 18 August 2023 that classified …
The applicant, Mukesh Kumar, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 302 and 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of his wife. He claimed innocence, arguing that the death was accidental, the FIR was delayed by nine hours, and that the trial had progressed slowly …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and subsequent criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 319 of 2010) relating to offences under Sections 307, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the …
Ram Kumar filed an FIR alleging that his son Ankit Srivastav was assaulted. The charge‑sheet filed by the police omitted Ankit as a witness. Ram Kumar applied to the magistrate for further investigation under Sec. 173(8)/193(3) CrPC, but the magistrate rejected the application twice, first on the …
The revisionist, Ila Sharma, filed Criminal Revision No. 8769 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel Gyan Chandra Yadav informed the court that the revisionist no longer wishes to pursue the revision and requested its withdrawal. The court accepted the request and dismissed the revision as …
The Committee of Management of Shri Sarju Prasad Educational Institute filed a writ petition alleging that the State of Uttar Pradesh and other officials had not considered its applications dated 31‑05‑2022 and 20‑04‑2023 filed under Regulation 9, Chapter 7 of the Regulations framed under the U.P. …
The applicants, Saurabh Sonkar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a charge sheet dated 9‑December‑2019 and the cognizance order dated 3‑March‑2023 in Criminal Case No. 14315 of 2023, arising from FIR Crime No. 369 of 2019 under …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 13598/9 of 2024) arising from offences under Sections 115(2) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified on …
The applicant, Chandani, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 40152 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant had already been acquitted, making the bail application unnecessary. The State of U.P., as …
The petitioner, Yogesh Chandra Mishra, filed writ petition No. 38833 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after a revised call. The Court therefore dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered the petitioner to pay a cost of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kamal Singh, who was charged under Sections 302, 420, 201, 475 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the informant’s later statement implicating him was unreliable, further noting that …
Nanhe Khan appealed the Special Judge’s order refusing bail in a case involving IPC sections 191, 109, 352, 115 and several provisions of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellant claimed he was falsely implicated, had no specific role, and that similarly …
Shahzad Ahmad Khan filed a writ petition challenging an inquiry report issued by the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petitioner argued that the report was a final order and sought relief. The respondents contended that the report was not a final order and must be acted upon …
Petitioner No.1, Vice‑President of a society, and Petitioner No.3, appointed Secretary, challenged an order dated 30 June 2025 by the Director/Registrar refusing to confirm the Secretary's appointment. They argued that the order was passed ex parte, without any notice of the hearing, violating …
M/s Naresh Agrawal Construction Pvt Ltd filed an application under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator against the Ghaziabad Development Authority. The court examined the consent of former Justice Sushil Harkauli to act as arbitrator, …
The petitioner, Anoop Singh Tomar, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 39197 of 2025) challenging a mutation proceeding initiated by the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner during the hearing. The Court observed that writ jurisdiction is generally unavailable for …
The applicant Akshay was arrested in connection with the murder of an informant's brother on 14 March 2025, alleged under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the BNS. The prosecution's case relied on the FIR stating that the accused and co‑accused moved the dead body to their house, but offered no direct …
Anuj Kumar was charged in a murder case (Crime No. 103 of 2025) under several IPC sections, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The prosecution’s case rests mainly on the applicant’s own confessional statement, the statement of co‑accused Pranshu Pal, and a two‑second phone call with the deceased; no …
Satish Kumar filed a writ petition (Writ No. 39165 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court challenging proceedings related to the mutation of his land records. The petition was filed against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. No counsel or parties appeared before the court on …
Petitioner Rajaf @ Rajjab filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 01.11.2025 that alleged offences under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. While the writ was pending, the petitioner was arrested on 12.02.2026 and the investigating …
Petitioner Vikram Singh, owner of a vehicle that was used to transport a cow and its progeny, challenged an FIR dated 23 September 2025 filed under the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cows Slaughter Act, 1955 (sections 3, 5A, 8, 5B) and the Arms Act, 1959 (sections 3, 25). He argued that he had no …
The petitioner, Sriram Gupta, filed a writ petition challenging an order passed by the State of U.P. and three other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the order could be contested through an alternative statutory remedy. The court observed that because an alternative remedy exists, …
The petitioners, tenure holders of land slated for acquisition for a four‑lane National Highway, challenged the order of the Special Land Acquisition Officer dated 02‑04‑2025 which rejected their claim for compensation. After the death of the husband (original tenure holder), the first petitioner’s …
The petitioner, a society registered under the U.P. Goshala Act, 1964, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging an order dated August 2024 that rejected its claim for payment under a government order of September 2023, on the ground that it was a religious institution running a goshala. …
The petitioner, Rashid Ali, filed a writ petition alleging that he had not encroached upon the adjacent chak road. The court noted that the petitioner had not taken any steps to demarcate his land, which was essential to establish the claim. Consequently, the court found no evidence of encroachment …
The applicants challenged the chargesheet and cognizance order in a criminal case (State v. Shobh Nath et al.) alleging false implication and undue delay in filing the FIR. They argued that the alleged offence occurred on 14‑06‑2020 but the FIR was lodged on 17‑08‑2020, and that the injury was …
The petitioner, Sushil Kumar, filed a writ petition challenging the objection he raised in the allotment of a patta, seeking a declaration that he has the locus to file such objections. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others, contended that the petition merely seeks a decision on …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay Kumar, who was arrested under IPC Section 64(A) and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that the allegations were false and that the victim’s testimony during trial indicated no assault or rape. The prosecution opposed …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Neeraj alias Neeru, who is accused in Crime No.148 of 2023 under IPC sections 307, 506, 34 and Arms Act sections 3, 25, 27. The first bail plea was dismissed for lack of prosecution, and the applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, …
The appellant Sanjay Awasthi appealed against a cognizance and summoning order issued by a Special Judge under Section 14‑A(1) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The FIR alleged that the appellant and three others, armed with clubs, sticks and an axe, …
Dinanath Tiwari was arrested on charges under IPC sections 61(2)(k), 64(1), 127(2), 351(2) and 352 and filed a bail application claiming he was falsely implicated and that his statement was obtained under coercion. He had been in custody since 8 August 2025 and sought release on bail. The State …
Ravindra Singh alias Chunnu, accused of offences under Sections 147, 148, 307, 323, 504, 506, 302 and 34 of the IPC, applied for bail while the trial was nearing its conclusion, having been in custody since 28 May 2024. His earlier bail application was rejected and a Special Leave Petition …
Altaf Ali applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 181 of 2025) alleging his involvement in a death where aluminium phosphide was found in the victim's viscera. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the FIR was lodged two days after the incident, he has no prior criminal record, and the …
The applicants, Rubi and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 13.05.2025 and a cognizance order dated 04.10.2025 in State v. Saroj. They contended that the offence under Section 115(2) BNSS is non‑cognizable and, per the explanation to …
The petitioners Ramyad @ Ramyad Nishad and three others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Jaunpur, to decide appeal No. 4713 (Ramyad & others v. Nand Lal & others) under Section 11(1) of the U.P. Consolidation of …
The applicant, Akanksha Soni, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 29‑09‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 13‑05‑2025 in a case filed under Sections 323 and 504 of the IPC. The sole contention was that the offences are …
The petitioner, Raje Lal Uttam, filed a writ petition under Section 67‑A of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, seeking relief against an order dated 18‑11‑2024. The petition referenced a certified copy of an earlier order dated 11‑07‑2025 in Writ C No. 18359/2022, but failed to attach that copy …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528/482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 23.11.2020 and the entire criminal case (Case No. 2430 of 2020) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 452, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 25‑07‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 21‑10‑2024 in a Special Session Trial under the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The High Court examined …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash charge sheet No.24 of 2020 and the entire criminal proceedings (S.T. No.100 of 2024) arising from Crime No.17 of 2020, which involved offences under sections 323, 324, 325, 308, 452, 504 and 506 of …
Deepak Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 44583, alleging that he was falsely implicated for allegedly uploading a video on Facebook. The State argued that an FIR under Section 318(4) of the BNSS and Section 66‑D of the …
The applicant, Vinod Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 13‑01‑2026 and a cognizance/summoning order dated 18‑07‑2026 in a special trial under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. He argued that …
Petitioners Moinuddin @ Jammu and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 19-10-2025 and the subsequent charge sheet filed on 10-04-2026 under various sections of the BNSS. The State argued that the charge sheet had already been filed, exonerating petitioners …
The applicants, Istekar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 31‑07‑2019 and the entire proceeding under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. Their contention was that the gangster case …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case registered under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985, where the accused was alleged to possess 1.174 kg of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the application. The court noted that the application had become infructuous due to the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Neetu @ Dudu, who had been in custody since 14 October 2025 in connection with a criminal case involving Sections 64, 351(3), 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 of the POSCO Act. The court noted that a notice to the first informant had been …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohammad Gulam Gaus, who was in custody since 17 October 2025 in a case under Sections 318(4), 338, 61(2), 336(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 66-D of the I.T. Act. The applicant claimed innocence, lack of credible evidence, and sought parity with …
Ram Prakash filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and 57 others seeking relief related to a demarcation process. During the pendency of the petition, the respondents, through their standing counsel, informed the court that the demarcation procedure had already been initiated, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sher Mohammad, who was accused under several CrPC provisions and Section 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the victim, with whom he had a consensual relationship, later made false accusations …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Farhan Raza Khan in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 43299 of 2025, relating to case No. 1146 of 2025 involving several IPC offences. The applicant contended that he was not named in the FIR and was only mentioned in a later statement, with a …
The petitioner Kanhaiyalal filed a writ petition challenging the dismissal of his application for restoration of a suit. The High Court examined whether the respondent authority could dismiss the restoration application despite a legal impediment and without hearing the petitioner on merits. The …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 20372 of 2018) arising from FIR No. 278 of 2017, which alleged offences under numerous sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act and …
Petitioner Yusuf filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court after his application for impleadment was dismissed by the trial court. The petitioner sought to challenge the dismissal and to be impleaded as a party in the underlying proceedings. The respondents contended that the writ petition …
Anuj Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure invoking the High Court's inherent jurisdiction to quash the charge‑sheet dated 18‑05‑2022, the cognizance order dated 17‑07‑2023, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 1170 of 2023) arising from offences …
The applicant, Smt. Kanika Swami, filed an application under Section 528 of the Negotiable Instruments Act seeking to quash an order dated 11‑08‑2017 and a subsequent NBW order dated 08‑07‑2020 in a criminal complaint (No. 2376 of 2017) filed by the State under Section 138 of the NI Act. The …
The petitioner, Dhruv Pratap Singh, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to enforce a District Magistrate's order dated 19 September 2025 that required action against a sitting Gram Pradhan for alleged misuse of public funds. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Babu Ali, who is charged under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant asserted that he is innocent, not a …
The High Court entertained a criminal revision filed under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2015 on behalf of a 16‑year‑old juvenile (revisionist) who was in a Juvenile Care Home. The revision challenged the orders of the Juvenile Justice Board and the Additional …
The petitioner, Navirasool, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to promptly conclude the pending proceedings of Case No. 396/1996 under Section 198(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Zila Adalat (U.P.Z.A.) and Land Revenue Act, as well as to decide an …
The applicant, Dharmendra, filed a bail application under sections 137(2), 87 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and section 65(2) of the Indian Evidence Act in connection with FIR No. 259/2025. He alleged that the prosecution’s case was based on false statements, citing sections 180 and 183 of the …
The Allahabad High Court entertained two applications: one seeking amendment to delete applicants 1‑6 from the party list, and another under Section 528 of the CrPC on behalf of applicants 7‑16 to quash the charge‑sheet and obtain protection from arrest. The court found no objection from the State …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dharmendra Kumar Saroj in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the CrPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, pointing out the FIR was lodged six days after the alleged incident and that …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State and local authorities to remove alleged illegal encroachments by private parties on three parcels of Gaon Sabha land in Mau district. The State responded that ten cases under Section 67(1) of the Uttar …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Mukesh, who was arrested in an NDPS case alleging possession of 620 grams of diazepam, a quantity marginally above the commercial threshold. The applicant argued that the seizure …
Petitioners Yaduvir Singh and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 07‑09‑2025 registered under several IPC offences. After investigation, the police filed a charge‑sheet on 15‑12‑2025 under Section 193(3) CrPC, charging two petitioners and exonerating the …
The petitioners, a registered society running an old age home, challenged the State's refusal to renew their 2022 management agreement and the issuance of a tender for a new agency. The State argued that the agreement had expired and it was within its discretion to appoint another agency under the …
The applicant, Sunny Divakar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 1612 of 2022) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Khaga, which involved offences under Sections 323, 406, 356 and 506 of the IPC. The …
The applicant Suraj Kumar filed a bail application in the Allahabad High Court while the trial was at the stage of recording his statement under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The status report indicated that the trial was at the “fag end” with the statement recording scheduled for 30 …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking mandamus to remove alleged illegal encroachments on land recorded as road and banjar land in Prayagraj and to compel the District Magistrate to decide a representation dated 16-12-2025. The Court directed the parties to obtain instructions, …
Rohit Kumar Sah was arrested under sections 65(1) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code and sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences. The applicant contended that the accusation was false, citing the victim's age of 18, prior acquaintance, and lack of corroborative medical evidence. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition which was not pursued, leading the court to dismiss it for want of prosecution. The court imposed a cost of Rs.1000 to be deposited with the High Court Legal Services Committee. It directed that any application for restoration of the petition would be entertained …
The petitioners Natthoo Singh and others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for priority hearing under the heading "Oldest pending cases for priority hearing." No counsel or parties appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the private respondents on …
The petitioner Birbal filed writ petition No.14175 of 1983 before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for priority hearing but neither the petitioner nor the private respondent appeared before the court. Since no party was present to argue, the court dismissed the writ petition in …
The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 14399 of 1983 in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner for the hearing, even after the case was listed for priority. The court noted the absence of representation and found the petition unprosecuted. Consequently, the writ …
The petition filed by Babu Ram under writ jurisdiction sought relief against D.D.C. and others. Respondents moved for abatement of proceedings on the ground that a substitution application had not been filed, and an abatement application was also filed. The court observed that a substitution …
The petitioner, Shital, filed a writ petition in 1981 before the Allahabad High Court. The matter remained pending for over four decades without any appearance by the petitioner's counsel. The court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and dismissed if no cause of action …
The writ petition (WRIT‑B No. 15935 of 1981) was listed under the caption “Oldest Pending Cases In This High Court, For Priority Hearing”. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the scheduled date, even after being listed in the revised list. The court observed the petitioner’s failure …
The petitioner, Tausif, filed Writ Petition No. 15143 of 1983 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the D.D.C. and others. The matter was listed for priority hearing under the "oldest pending cases" category. On the scheduled date, neither the petitioner nor the private respondent …
The petition was originally filed in 1983 and remained pending for over four decades. The High Court issued a notice directing that all old cases up to 2022 be taken up and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner's counsel appeared nor was the case marked …
A writ petition (Writ‑B No. 1244 of 1977) was filed by Shri Kant against D.D.C. and others. The petition was listed but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to advance the matter. The court noted that the petition remained unprosecuted despite being listed. The legal question was whether …
This is Criminal Appeal No. 2298 of 1985 filed by Nathu Singh against Nanhey Singh. The appellant, Nathu Singh, had died on 29 October 2005 and no legal heirs or family members were residing at the address on record. Counsel for both parties were absent, while the State's A.G.A. was present. The …
The appellant, Dukh Haran, filed a second appeal (No. 1079 of 1982) against the respondents, Priya Nath and others, before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant to press the appeal, and the court noted that the appellant seemed uninterested in pursuing the matter. …
The petition was filed by Surendra Pal Singh challenging a consolidation order issued by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, which was based on a revision filed by Jai Devi. The order readjusted the allocation of land parcels (chak) between the parties, rejecting the petitioner's claim to a …
The petitioner, Hanuman Das, filed writ petition No. 14836 of 1981 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf during the hearing. The Court observed that the petition had not been prosecuted and therefore dismissed it. A cost of Rs.1000 was imposed, to be deposited in the …
A writ petition (Writ B No. 13925 of 1982) was filed by Dal Singar against D.D.C. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the petition. The earlier interim order, if any, was discharged. The dismissal …
We use cookies for analytics to improve your experience. Essential cookies are always on. Privacy Policy.