Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 14601–14800
The petition filed by Deo Prayag was listed for priority hearing but no party appeared to press the petition. The court noted the absence of any petitioner on the revised list and consequently dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. As a result, any interim order that had been granted was …
The petitioner, Dular, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The court issued a notice on 24 July 2025 directing the petitioner to engage another counsel. By a report dated 17 March 2026, the court found that no counsel had appeared on the petitioner's behalf and no undelivered …
The petitioner, Fauz Singh, filed writ petition No. 14623 of 1982 before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for priority hearing under "Oldest pending cases". Neither the petitioner nor the private respondent appeared before the Court on the scheduled date. The Court, noting the absence …
The petitioner filed a writ petition but failed to prosecute the case. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The High Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered the petitioner to pay a cost of Rs.1000 to the High Court Legal Services Committee. The registry will …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear or prosecute the case. The court, noting the lack of prosecution, dismissed the petition and ordered the petitioners to pay a cost of Rs.1000 to the High Court Legal Services Committee. The court directed that any …
A writ petition (Writ‑B No. 15079 of 1982) was filed by Kharpattu against the D.D.C. and others. The petition was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Vikram D. Chauhan. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition when the matter came up for hearing. The Court observed that …
The petitioners, Chandra and another, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear or engage counsel. The court noted that a notice dated 17 March 2026 was duly served on the petitioners to appoint new counsel. Since no representation was made, the petition could not be …
The petitioner, Raffu, filed a writ petition (Writ No. 14116 of 1983) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents, D.D.C. and others. The petition was listed for priority hearing under the oldest pending cases. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner at any stage, …
The petition filed by Amar Nath Singh and others was listed for priority hearing but no petitioner appeared to press the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have been in force. No substantive merits of the case were …
A writ petition (Writ‑B No. 1825 of 1981) was filed by Laju against J.D.C. and others. The petition was listed for a priority hearing under the 'Oldest Pending Cases' category. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner at the hearing, even after the revised list was issued. The court held that …
The appellant, Preetam Singh, filed a second appeal but failed to appear before the High Court. The court noted that no counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant to press the appeal. It was observed that the appellant seemed uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed …
Petitioners Lal Bachan and others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel or party appeared to press the petition on the scheduled hearing date. The court noted the absence of any party to prosecute the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of …
The petitioner, Girvar Singh, filed a writ petition in 1983 against the Board of Revenue. The case remained pending for over four decades without any appearance by the petitioner’s counsel. The court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and dismissed if the cause of action no …
Salik Ram filed a writ petition (Writ B No. 14677 of 1983) before the Allahabad High Court against D.D.C. and others. The petition was listed under the "Oldest pending cases" for priority hearing. No counsel or party appeared to press the petition on the revised list. The Court observed that the …
The petitioner, Sagiran, filed Writ Petition No. 14741 of 1983 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondent, D.D.C. The matter was listed for a priority hearing under the "Oldest pending cases" category. On the scheduled date, neither the petitioner nor the private …
The petitioner, Karam Singh, filed a writ petition (Writ‑B No. 14973 of 1983) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. The petition was listed under the “oldest pending cases” for priority hearing. No counsel or party appeared to press the petition on the scheduled …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in 1983 which remained pending for over four decades. The High Court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and that non-appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither petitioner counsel appeared nor was the case marked to show …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in 1983 which remained pending for over four decades. The High Court issued a notice directing that all old cases up to 2022 be heard and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioners' counsel appeared nor was the case …
Jumnai filed a second appeal (No. 1517 of 1983) before the Allahabad High Court against a decree in favor of M. Ahmad. The appeal was listed but no counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant to prosecute the matter. The court observed that the appellant seemed uninterested in pursuing the appeal. …
A writ petition (Writ‑B No. 157 of 1983) was filed by Udai Narain against D.D.C. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered a cost of Rs. 1000 to be deposited with the High Court Legal Services Committee. The …
The petitioner, Dhani Ram, filed writ petition No. 1597 of 1983 before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed under the "Oldest pending cases" category for a priority hearing. No counsel or party appeared to press the petition on the revised list. Consequently, the Court dismissed the …
The petitioner, Ram Jatan, filed writ petition No.16091 of 1983 before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for priority hearing under “Oldest pending cases”. On the scheduled date, neither the petitioner’s counsel nor the private respondent appeared before the court. Consequently, the …
Smt. Nagina Kuer filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on her behalf during the hearing. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and imposed a cost of Rs.1000 to be deposited in the High Court Legal Services Committee account. The Registry was …
The writ petition (Writ‑B No. 1868 of 1983) was filed in 1983 and remained pending for over four decades. No counsel appeared for the petitioners on the scheduled hearing and the case was not marked to indicate that any cause of action survived. The High Court had issued a notice that all old cases …
The appellant Harcharan was convicted by the trial court for murder and attempt to murder under Sections 302/34 and 307 IPC based on the testimony of the complainant and other witnesses who claimed the accused entered the victim's house at night and fired. On appeal, the High Court examined the …
The appellants were convicted in 1983 for offences under IPC sections 324, 148, 147, 323/149 and 324/149 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the Allahabad High Court examined whether the trial court should have exercised the discretion under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and …
The appellants were convicted by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Shahjahanpur, for attempting murder under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC and for a firearms offence under the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that, motivated by electoral rivalry, the accused surrounded the victim, …
The appellants Sobaran Singh and others filed a criminal appeal against the State. No counsel appeared for the appellants, while the State was represented by the learned A.G.A. The court noted that appellant No.2, Ajab Singh, had died on 5 July 2022 as per an office report dated 17 March 2026. …
The appellant Radhey Shyam filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for him and the State was represented by A.G.A. The court’s office report dated 17‑03‑2026 revealed that the sole appellant had died about 22 years earlier. The court held that the death of the …
The appellants, Shivcharan and Hazari Lal, were subjected to a non‑bailable warrant after an order dated 13‑02‑2026 directed their production before the Allahabad High Court. They contended that a coordinate bench had already acquitted them in Criminal Appeal No. 1833 of 1987, but the acquittal …
The case arose from a village dispute over a newly built toilet wall, which led to a violent clash on 14 June 1981. The prosecution alleged that nine accused, including Israil Khan and Baley Khan, formed an unlawful assembly, armed themselves with lathis and other weapons, and assaulted the …
The appellant Brijendra Singh filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. The matter was heard by a bench of two judges, with counsel Kamal Singh and V.P. Pathak representing the appellant and A.G.A. representing the State. No facts or legal issues were detailed …
The appeal, filed by Khela Singh and Gatuwa (Butuwa) against the State, was taken up in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the appellants, and the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banda, submitted a report indicating that …
The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 15831 of 1981 before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for priority hearing under "Oldest pending cases". Neither the petitioner nor the private respondent appeared before the court. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition in default. …
A writ petition (Writ B No. 1542 of 1980) was filed by Smt. Ram Murti against Smt. Phool Mati and others. The petition was listed for priority hearing under the caption 'Oldest Pending Cases'. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, even after being listed in the …
The appellant, a police officer, was convicted under Section 307 IPC and the Arms Act for shooting a Sub‑Inspector during a night patrol in 1981. He appealed, arguing that the prosecution failed to prove the requisite intent to murder, that the investigation was tainted by bias, and that he deserved …
The petitioner, Ganesh Prasad, filed Writ Petition No. 1378 of 1980 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the case was listed for hearing. The court noted that the petition had not been prosecuted. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the …
The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.1505 of 1980 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the respondent was represented by counsel. The court noted the absence of the petitioner’s representation. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition in …
The appellant Govinda and Suraj were convicted by the Sessions Court under Section 364 IPC for kidnapping with the intention to murder Sita Ram, whose decapitated body was later found. The trial court acquitted them of murder and related charges, finding no evidence of who killed the victim. On …
The appellants, Heera Lal and Moti Lal, appealed against an order dated 13‑January‑1987 of the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Banda, which forfeited their surety bonds and imposed a penalty of Rs.5,000 each under Section 446 of the Criminal Procedure Code. During the pendency of the appeal, the …
Shalini Saxena filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 654 of 2021) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous and should be dismissed. The …
The petitioners, Mohd. Yakub and others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the Board of Revenue. The petition was listed but no petitioner appeared to pursue the matter. The court noted that the petitioners seemed uninterested in continuing the proceedings. …
The petitioner Surendra Kumar filed a writ petition (Writ‑B No.1384 of 1983) in the Allahabad High Court against D.D.C. and others. The petition remained pending for over four decades without any appearance by the petitioner’s counsel. The court issued a notice directing that all old cases up to …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order and subsequent proceedings under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, in Special Case No. 77 of 2015. The basis of the …
The petitioner was appointed as an orderly in June 1987 and terminated in October 1987 under the Uttar Pradesh Temporary Government Servants (Termination of Service) Rules, 1975. An interim order stayed the termination, allowing him to continue in service until June 2022, despite the writ petition …
The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 14676 of 1983 in the Allahabad High Court. The case was listed for priority hearing under the oldest pending cases. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after the revised list was issued. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want …
The petitioner filed Writ‑A No. 562 of 2022 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and four others. The matter remained pending since 2022 and was listed under the oldest pending cases for a priority hearing. A notice on the court board directed that old cases be …
Petitioners Smt. Sukhiya Kumari and another filed a writ petition seeking police protection for their life and liberty. No petitioner appeared before the court, and the standing counsel for the State submitted a police report stating that the petitioners had earlier declared they faced no threat and …
Prem Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.106 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 87, 137(2), 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 5L/6 of the POSCO Act. The victim’s ossification test indicated an age of about 21 years, and the applicant’s counsel argued that the victim was a …
The revisionist, Vineet @ Goldi, challenged a family court order dated 8‑12‑2023 that directed him to pay a monthly maintenance of Rs 10,000 to the opposite party. He argued that his salary of Rs 12,000 per month and lack of other income made the amount excessive and that the trial court ignored his …
Smt Prema Devi filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the Regional Transport Authority, Kanpur and others. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition should be dismissed as infructuous because the cause of action no longer existed. The court considered …
Petitioners Hemant Srivastav and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 1135 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. After subsequent developments, they sought to withdraw the petition, filing a withdrawal application. The State of U.P. and other respondents, represented by the …
The appellants were convicted by a Fast Track Court for kidnapping a minor under Section 363 IPC and sentenced to five years' imprisonment and a fine. On appeal, the High Court examined the prosecution's evidence, which relied mainly on the testimony of the complainant's wife and an informant who …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raj, who was arrested in Crime No. 105 of 2025 under several sections of the B.N.S. Act and sections 5(L) and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR was …
The appellants Mahendra, Bankey and Pappu (Mahipal) were convicted for the murder of Fateh Singh under IPC sections 302 and 34 and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution case relied on two eye‑witnesses, the son and brother of the deceased, and forensic evidence. The appellants challenged …
Moti Lal Goel filed a writ petition (WRIT-C No. 23616 of 2010) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner failed to appear at a hearing, and the court ordered him to engage new counsel. An office report dated 13.01.2026 revealed that the …
Petitioner Moti had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs.18,000 with arrears, rendering the writ petition infructuous. The petitioner’s counsel moved to withdraw the petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, directing that the benefits already granted continue until the …
The applicant, Puspendra @ Pawan, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 83 of 2025) under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed twelve days after the incident, no post‑mortem was conducted, and the only evidence linking him was a …
Moti Lal Goel filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner did not appear, and the court directed him to engage new counsel. An office report later revealed that the petitioner had died, and no application for substitution was filed. Since the sole petitioner was deceased …
The petitioners, Kamalesh Kumar and another, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs.18,000 with arrears. Their counsel, Lallan Prasad Pal, therefore moved to withdraw the writ petition, stating it had become infructuous. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The Court …
Moti Lal Goel filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner died before the hearing and no application for substitution of legal representative was filed. The court noted that notices had been dispatched but the original petitioner was deceased. In the absence of a substitute …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear even after a revised call. The court dismissed the petition on the ground of want of prosecution. The judges granted the petitioners liberty to file a restoration application within one month if they wish. No …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sumit in a criminal case under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, citing inconsistencies between the victim’s statements under sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S., lack of any injury …
The appellant Nirgun filed Criminal Appeal No. 7749 of 2009 against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant, while the State’s A.G.A. was present. A report dated 23 July 2025, based on a CJM Mahoba report of 19 Oct 2024, confirmed that the sole appellant had died …
The appellant filed a first appeal against a Family Court judgment dated 7 September 2021 that ordered maintenance pendente lite. The appellant later filed a withdrawal application on 27 January 2026, citing that the parties had settled their differences as reflected in a joint supplementary …
The petitioners, having already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs. 18,000 with arrears, moved the High Court to withdraw their writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. It ordered that the benefits already granted to the petitioners shall continue until their superannuation, …
The petitioners, having already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs. 18,000 with arrears, moved the High Court to withdraw their writ petition. Their counsel, Lallan Prasad Pal, argued that the relief already obtained rendered the petition infructuous. The Court accepted the withdrawal and …
The petitioner, Suresh Singh, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs.18,000 with arrears. His counsel therefore moved to withdraw the writ petition, stating it had become infructuous. The High Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The Court further …
The petitioner, Brij Bhoosan, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs 18,000 with arrears. Consequently, his counsel sought to withdraw the writ petition, arguing it had become infructuous. The High Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The Court further …
Vrs Foods Ltd. filed an application under Section 528 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, seeking to quash an order dated 07.11.2025 passed by the Nyaya Nirrayak Adhikari/Additional District Magistrate in a case under Section 26(2) of the Act. The State, through the learned A.G.A., raised a …
The petitioners, Lallan Prasad and another, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs. 18,000 with arrears. Consequently, their counsel moved to withdraw the writ petition, stating that the relief sought was already obtained. The Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as …
The petitioner, Sharada Prasad, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs 18,000 with arrears, making the pending writ petition redundant. His counsel, Lallan Prasad Pal, moved to withdraw the petition on this basis. The Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. …
The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar Verma, had previously been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs.18,000 with arrears by the authorities. On the basis of this relief, his counsel, Lallan Prasad Pal, moved that the present writ petition had become infructuous and sought its withdrawal. The Court accepted …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs. 18,000 with arrears, rendering the pending writ petition unnecessary. His counsel, Lallan Prasad Pal, moved to withdraw the petition on this basis. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and ordered that …
The petitioners, represented by Lallan Prasad Pal, sought relief regarding their pay scale but informed the court that they had already been granted a minimum pay of Rs. 18,000 with arrears, rendering the petition unnecessary. Consequently, the petitioners requested withdrawal of the writ petition. …
The petitioner, Chhavinath Dwivedi, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs 18,000 with arrears, rendering the pending writ petition unnecessary. Accordingly, his counsel sought to withdraw the petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The Court ordered that the …
Petitioner Shree Ram Rajbhar filed a writ petition seeking a minimum pay scale of Rs.18,000 with arrears. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that this relief had already been granted, rendering the petition infructuous, and requested its withdrawal. The court accepted the withdrawal and …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings against five members of the husband’s family in a case filed under Section 498A IPC, Section 323 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The FIR and charge sheet alleged only …
The petitioner, Smt Rama Devi Shukla, filed a writ petition under Section 101 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, challenging an order dated 23 April 2025 passed by Respondent No.4. The petitioner sought dismissal of the writ petition on the ground that it was not pressed with liberty to challenge the …
The petitioners, Deo Raj Singh and two others, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs 18,000 with arrears, making their writ petition effectively moot. Their counsel moved to withdraw the petition on this basis. The High Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as …
The appellant Monu @ Manoj filed a jail appeal (No. 4848 of 2013) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. While the appeal was pending, the Court received an office report dated 22 September 2022 confirming that the sole appellant had died, as reported by the Chief Judicial …
The appellant, Monu @ Manoj, filed a jail appeal before the Allahabad High Court. The appellant was represented by counsel Kalpana Singh, who also appeared as amicus curiae. During the pendency of the appeal, a report dated 21‑08‑2022, based on a fax from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bijnor, …
Petitioner Guddu filed a writ petition seeking a minimum pay scale of Rs.18,000 with arrears. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the relief had already been granted, rendering the petition infructuous, and requested its withdrawal. The court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in 2016 before the Allahabad High Court, which remained pending for several years. The court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared nor …
Petitioner Mohan Prakash challenged an FIR dated 20‑12‑2025 registered under Section 111(2)(b) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. He filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but later withdrew the substantive prayer, asking only that the court …
Petitioner Fauzi Pal had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs.18,000 with arrears, and his counsel moved to withdraw the writ petition on that basis. The High Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The Court further directed that the benefits already granted …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Golu Balmiki, who was arrested in connection with a case registered under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The applicant contended that he was not named in the FIR, that the FIR was …
The appellants Lakhmi, Languri and Yogesh were convicted for the brutal murder, beheading and assault of Chameli Devi and the injury of her grandson Krishna Kumar, under Sections 302/34, 307/34, 509/34 and 506 IPC. The appellants appealed, arguing that the child witness’s testimony contained …
The applicant, Smt. Aastha Sharma, filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a criminal case (State Vs Prashant Kaushik and others) from the ACJM Court‑5 in Ghaziabad to the District Court in Meerut and to stay the proceedings. The application was …
The Allahabad High Court considered bail application No. 4005 of 2026 filed by Babu Ram Rajbhar in criminal case No. 205 of 2025, which is instituted under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the …
Rahul Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 3809 of 2026) before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The applicant was represented by counsel Dileep Singh Yadav, while the State was represented by Yashwant Singh, G.A. The matter was listed before Hon'ble Dr. Gautam …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in March 2021 seeking a direction to be allowed to attend an interview scheduled for 23 March 2021 for the post of Principal in a college. No interim relief was granted and the interview concluded; by 2025 the recruitment process was completed and the waiting …
The petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking an order to remove alleged illegal encroachments on public utility land (Arazi No.599 Ka) by respondents 6 to 13, relying on an earlier order dated 23‑04‑2025 issued under Section 26 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The Nagar …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vipin Pandey in a criminal case (Crime No. 237 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4(1) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, citing an ossification test that placed the …
The petitioner, Shri Prakash Yadav, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 9016 of 2018) in the Allahabad High Court. The matter remained pending since 2018 and was listed as an old case for priority hearing. The court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be taken up and warned that …
The petitioners challenged an order dated 11.08.2025 passed by the Commissioner, Moradabad Division under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The High Court observed that the petitioners have a statutory alternative remedy – a second appeal under the III Schedule of the same Code – and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Roshan in Criminal Case No. 655 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 65(1), 352 of the IPC and Sections 5(I)/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that the victim, a major, had …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Magistrate to consider their representation dated 26‑09‑2025 for entry of their names as legal heirs of a deceased in the revenue records. The court examined the representation and noted that such relief is governed by Section …
Virendra Kumar Agrawal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking mandamus to ensure a fair, impartial and speedy investigation into a case involving offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code, to order the arrest of …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court in 2021. The court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and warned that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared nor was the petition marked to show that …
Lal Bahadur filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of U.P. and six other respondents. The petition was argued before Hon'ble Justice Prakash Padia. After hearing the submissions, the court held that the petition was not pressed. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, Umadatt Sharma, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 5906 of 2021) in the Allahabad High Court. The matter remained pending since 2021 and was listed under the oldest pending cases for a priority hearing. A notice on the court board warned that old cases up to 2022 would be dismissed as …
The petitioner, Diam Kumar Premi, filed a writ petition in 2021 before the Allahabad High Court. The court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard promptly and warned that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared nor was …
The petitioner, Chhitar Singh, filed a writ petition in 2001 which remained pending for over two decades. The High Court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared nor was the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in 2021, but neither the petitioner nor his counsel appeared for the hearing. The court had issued a notice that old cases up to 2022 would be heard and dismissed as infructuous if no cause of action survived or the parties failed to appear. Since the petitioner …
The petitioners challenged an order dated 29 August 2025 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Jaunpur, under Section 38(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which was initiated by respondent No.6, Sri Prakash. The Court noted that the petitioners failed to demonstrate any prejudice caused …
The applicant, Rajeev Ahirwar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 47306 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 281 and 106(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 279 and 304-A of the IPC. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 246 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the same Act. The counsel argued that the applicants had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the order dated 20 January 2026 of the Sessions Judge, Baghpat, which had dismissed their preliminary objection to the framing of charge in a criminal case under Sections 109(1) and …
The petitioner, Dileep Kumar Gupta, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 7166 of 2019) before the Allahabad High Court. The matter remained pending since 2019 and was listed among the oldest cases for a priority hearing. The court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be taken up and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 15187 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bijnor. The application aimed to nullify the cognizance and summoning order dated …
The petitioner Avinash Kumar Pandey filed a writ petition in 2020 which remained pending for several years. The High Court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and that non-appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. The petitioner’s counsel did not appear and the case …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Crime No. 186 of 2024) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur. The charges involved Sections 115(2), 351 and 352 of the same Act. …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 7260 of 2022) in the Allahabad High Court, which has remained pending since 2022. The court issued a notice directing that all old cases up to 2022 be heard in the first round and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither …
The applicant, Deepak @ Madan, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 2149 of 2023) arising from alleged offences under Sections 323 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant admitted …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 76152 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 354‑Kha and 325 of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Tushar, accused in Crime No. 204 of 2025 under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, citing an acute medical ailment, lack of incriminating material, and alleged false recovery of a knife, while …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 4499 of 2022) filed by the State of U.P. under IPC sections 147, 148, 323, 504 and 506. They argued that they had not been arrested and that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, …
The applicant, Kishan Pal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 42 of 2021, Crime No. 256 of 2020) pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Rampur, which involved offences under IPC sections …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 6280 of 2021) in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The matter was listed as an old pending case and a notice was issued that any such case not marked as surviving or not appearing would be dismissed as …
The petitioner, Smt. Dhanpatiya, filed a writ petition seeking a directive to the Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Tehsil Sadar, Gorakhpur, to decide the pending case RST/4070 of 2025 within the stipulated period. The petitioner alleged undue delay and unnecessary adjournments in the disposal of …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in 2021 which remained pending. The court issued a notice that old cases up to 2022 would be heard and dismissed if the parties did not appear or indicate that the cause of action survived. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared nor was the petition marked to …
The petitioner, Saruddin, filed a writ petition (Writ-A No. 6312 of 2021) in the Allahabad High Court which remained pending since 2021. The court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard promptly and warned that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the …
The appellant, Sunil Agrahari, appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking bail in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 452 of the IPC and related provisions of the SC/ST …
The petitioner, Prahlad, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to investigate and remove an alleged illegal and forged entry on Gram Sabha land in Village Semari, Mirzapur, which was recorded as Banjar. He alleged that villagers, in …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to halt alleged illegal commercial construction on Khasra Nos. 1030 and 1063 in Ghaziabad, to order demolition of the structures under Section 27 of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, and to direct an inquiry into a purported …
The petitioner Sunita Singh filed a writ petition in 2020 before the Allahabad High Court. The court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard promptly and warned that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared nor was the case …
The petitioner, Anju Singh, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 7558 of 2022) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and five other respondents. The matter had been pending since 2022 and was listed under the oldest pending cases for a priority hearing. A notice on …
The petitioner, Indrajeet Singh Yadav, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 7554 of 2022) before the Allahabad High Court. The court had issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard promptly and warned that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s …
The petitioner, Musabbar, challenged a show‑cause notice issued by the Tehsildar of Sambhal directing him to remove an alleged illegal encroachment on 0.078 hectare of land. The petitioner submitted a written objection on 30‑08‑2025, which was annexed to the writ petition. The Respondent’s …
Dr. Dhananjay Singh appealed against the State of U.P. and five others in a civil miscellaneous matter. The appellant filed a withdrawal application (Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 19 of 2026) seeking to withdraw the appeal. The respondents, represented by Brajesh Kumar Chaturvedi and …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in 2020 seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The case remained pending for several years and no counsel appeared for the petitioner at the scheduled hearing. The court had issued a notice that old cases up to 2022 would be heard and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajendra Singh, who was arrested on 16‑10‑2025 in connection with offences under sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S. Act and sections 3(2) and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The alleged victim, a minor born on 22‑07‑2011, gave a statement indicating …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in 2021 which remained pending. The High Court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and warned of dismissal as infructuous if parties did not appear or indicate that the cause of action survived. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in 2020 which remained pending for several years. The High Court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared nor was the case marked to …
The petitioner, Nagma Parveen, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 8028 of 2022) in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The matter had been pending since 2022 and was listed under the oldest pending cases for a priority hearing. The …
Manju Yadav filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 7799 of 2022) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petition was presented by counsel Arvind Kumar, Kartikeya Saran and Kushmondeya Shahi, while the respondents were represented by Avneesh Tripathi, C.S.C. and Shyam Krishna …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 8008 of 2022) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The matter had been pending since 2022 and was listed under the oldest pending cases for a priority hearing. The court issued a …
The petitioner, Ram Het Gautam, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 8153 of 2022) before the Allahabad High Court. The court had issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard promptly and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel …
The writ petition filed by Raghuray in 2020 remained pending without any appearance by the petitioner’s counsel. The High Court had issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be taken up and dismissed as infructuous if no appearance was made. The petitioner’s counsel did not appear nor mark …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Usman, who is accused under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of a woman. The applicant argued that he is innocent, has been in judicial custody since September 2022, and that key witnesses are either hostile or …
The petitioner, Sabah Uddin, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 8058 of 2022) before the Allahabad High Court. The case was listed as an old pending matter and a notice was issued that such cases would be heard and dismissed as infructuous if the parties did not appear or indicate that the cause of …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in 2020 which remained pending without any appearance by counsel. The court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. The petitioner’s counsel did not appear nor mark the case to …
The petitioner, Anirudh Singh, filed a writ petition alleging that a representation filed on 30 August 2025 before the District Magistrate, Deoria, was pending. The petition sought judicial intervention regarding the pending representation. The Court noted that the matter was sub‑judice before the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the entire proceedings in State vs Horilal (Case No. 413 of 2025) arising from a crime case under multiple sections of the BNS. The applicant argued that he was never arrested and that the charge‑sheet had been filed …
The applicant, Shri Vishal Tiwari, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Case No. 1315 of 2024, which arose from a criminal case under Sections 115(2), 352 and 117(2) of the BNSS. The application was presented before the High Court of …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in 2021 which remained pending. The High Court issued a notice that old cases up to 2022 would be heard and dismissed if the parties did not appear or indicate that the cause of action survived. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared nor was the case marked to …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the summons order in Criminal Case No. 11978 of 2024. They contended that the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate had issued the order on a printed proforma, merely filling in blanks …
The petitioner, Smt. Rani Kumari, a Silai Teacher, filed a writ petition alleging that she was being paid the salary of a Class‑IV post, which she claimed was improper. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, contested the claim. The Court observed that there were several disputed …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 7446 of 2021) in the Allahabad High Court, which remained pending since 2021. The court issued a notice directing that all old cases up to 2022 be taken up and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. The petitioners' counsel did …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash two criminal cases (Nos. 8152 of 2018 and 8601 of 2020) pending before the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Muzaffarnagar, which arose from a crime reported under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 …
The petition filed by Smt. Hadisunnisha challenged the order dated 29‑03‑2019 that directed vacant possession of a disputed property to the decree holder in Execution Case No. 5 of 1981. The petitioner argued that the execution case had been transferred to another court while related miscellaneous …
The Committee of Management of a society filed a writ petition seeking a direction to register the list of its office bearers for 2025‑26, asserting that there was no dispute and that the society was not time‑barred. The respondents pointed out several earlier writ petitions involving the same …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief, but the State respondents raised a preliminary objection that a similar dispute was already before the Division Bench in another PIL (No. 306 of 2026) and that filing a second petition violated the High Court Rules. …
The applicants, Preeti Soni and another, sought quashing of a charge‑sheet dated 2‑April‑2025 and related proceedings under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act, alleging that the dispute had been settled by compromise on 7‑Oct‑2025. The …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Consolidation Officer, Handia, Prayagraj, to decide a computerized case (No. 20205402323040286 of 2024) filed under Section 52(2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act within a reasonable time. The petitioner’s counsel …
Petitioner Bankey Lal and others filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Officer/ADM (Finance & Revenue), Jaunpur, to decide a pending case under Section 30(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, filed on 29-11-2023. The petitioners argued that the respondent's inaction caused undue …
The petition filed in 2020 before the Allahabad High Court remained pending without any appearance by the petitioner’s counsel. The court had issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. The petitioner’s counsel did not …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mohd Yunus under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed false implication and …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Sonu @ Navneet in a case involving multiple IPC offences. The applicant's first bail plea had been rejected, but co‑accused Vinod and Kapoor Singh were later released on bail, leading the applicant to argue that his case was on par with …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Santosh, the husband of a deceased woman, who was accused under IPC sections 80, 85, 351(3), 352 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged dowry‑related offences. The applicant argued that the deceased’s suicide note and …
The petitioner, Anurak Yadav, employed as a Helper in Meja Energy Nigam Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition alleging that the police had registered an NCR under Sections 115(2) and 3151(2) of the BNS against him, and that the responding authority failed to provide the verification report confirming his …
The petitioners, Dhanraji Devi and others, filed Writ C No. 7771 of 2026 challenging an order obtained by private respondent Jeet Narayan Singh, alleging concealment of facts in a prior judgment dated 10.07.2025 (Writ C No. 20929 of 2025). The order was being used by revenue authorities to initiate …
Sunil Yadav constructed an eight‑foot wall on government land (Gata Nos. 60 and 642) in Baruasagar, Jhansi, leading to an FIR for offences under Section 447 IPC and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. He filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to …
The petitioner, an Executive Engineer in the Uttar Pradesh Public Works Department, was suspended under the U.P. Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999 for allegedly bifurcating repair work tenders to keep each below the Rs 10 lakh threshold and thereby avoid mandatory e‑tendering. …
Dashrath Chauhan filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Nizamabad, Azamgarh, to decide a restoration application dated 03-06-2025 filed in case T202415060200751. The petitioner alleged delay in the SDM's decision and …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Neha Mishra under Section 482 CrPC in a murder case (Crime No. 461 of 2025). The petitioner argued that she was falsely implicated, the FIR was lodged nine days after the incident, she has no criminal record, and she is a …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Sarita alias Guddal alias Guddi Devi, who was implicated in a case under Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. The applicant argued that she was not named …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nadeem, accused under Sections 70(2) and 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged repeated rapes of a minor. The prosecution presented testimony of the informant (PW‑1) and the minor victim (PW‑2), both supporting the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Jagdish Yadav under Sections 2(b)(i), 2(b)(xi) and 3(1) of the Gangster Act in Crime No. 143 of 2025. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he was already on bail in two related cases, and disclosed a prior …
Petitioner Rahul Mishra filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Meja, Prayagraj, to decide case No. 3676 of 2024 (Computer Case No. T202402030803676) without further delay. The petitioner argued that despite a considerable lapse of time, no final …
The petitioner, Gulam Husain, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Machali Sahar, Jaunpur, to decide Suit No.7354 of 2025 under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within the stipulated period. The petition did not request any relief against the …
The petitioner, Kadeer Khan, challenged the disconnection of his electricity supply, alleging that no charge-sheet had been filed against him for the alleged theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act and that he had been regularly paying his dues. The court noted that the Department’s …
The applicant, Sonu Raidas, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 7‑Feb‑2017 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Railway Prayagraj, in connection with a trial under Section 153 of the Railway Act (Case No. …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Prince Kumar Singh under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR No. 0022 of 2026 alleging assault on a first informant. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that no specific role was assigned to him, …
The applicant, Tribeni, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking a direction for a fresh, independent investigation into the death of a deceased person in Crime No.0485 of 2024, Police Station Kothibhar, District Maharajganj. The application alleged that the local police might be …
The petitioner filed a writ petition which the Court found to be not pressed. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested dismissal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court allowed the prayer, dismissing the petition as not pressed and granting the liberty to file a new …
The petitioner, a complainant, sought a writ directing the Tehsildar of Madhiyahu Tehsil to decide a land revenue case under Section 67 of the Land Revenue Code, 2006 within the stipulated period. The Court noted that the petitioner failed to establish his locus standi or demonstrate that he is a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 560 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the same Act. They argued that they had not been arrested and that the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Tehsildar of Hata Tehsil, Kushinagar, to expeditiously decide a pending mutation application (Case No. 1099 of 2024). The petitioner argued that under sub‑rule (7) of Rule 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code Rules, 2016, the Tehsildar …
The applicant, Sonu Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 10 July 2025 and the entire proceedings of Crime No. 66 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 411, 413, 414 and 420 of the IPC. The application was filed before the High …
The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge‑sheet and a cognizance/summoning order dated 04.04.2022 in a case involving Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants contended that they were falsely …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 315 of 2026) arising from a charge‑sheet filed under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 333 and 324(4) of the BNS. The counsel argued that the applicants had not been arrested and the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a directive to the Tehsildar, Tehsil and District of Deoria to decide a mutation case (Case No. 7799 of 2021) under Sections 34 and 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, within the time limits prescribed by sub‑rule (7) of Rule 34 of the Uttar …
Petitioner Chandrapal filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate to decide a revenue case (Case No.8565 of 2025) under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code within the prescribed time. The High Court examined the petition …
The petitioner, a recorded Bhumidar and co‑sharer of agricultural land in Gautam Buddha Nagar, claimed that his land was affected by the laying of a 400 kV Jalpura‑Khurja power transmission line and that he had not received compensation despite representations under the revised Government of India …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant and related proceedings issued in criminal case No. 1476 of 2010. The applicant contended that he was on bail when the warrant was issued and that no summons or …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Gangster Act. The applicants, already on regular bail in a related gang‑related case, claimed innocence and asserted …
The applicant, Karan Jaat, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking bail in seven criminal cases pending before the Agra courts, arguing that he could not furnish separate sureties for each case due to poverty. He had been in custody since May 2023 and a prior bail order dated …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 45720 of 2025) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur, where they were charged under several provisions of the same Act. The applicants …
The applicant, Smt Shahnaj, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 23 January 2023 and the cognizance order dated 29 September 2023 in a case under the Cow Slaughter Act. The High Court noted that the charges against the …
Ashok Kumar Mishra filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of an earlier order dated 29‑03‑2023 that had directed continuation of his salary pending the outcome of an inquiry. The petitioner argued that the Deputy Director of Education had no statutory power to review his order under the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Suraj Goswami under several provisions of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, stating his name appeared only in a co-accused's confessional statement and not in the FIR, and offered to cooperate with the investigation. The …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Divyanshu Singh under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under IPC sections 191(2), 352, 351(3) and 109. The applicant asserted that he was falsely implicated, that no specific role was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Prayagraj in criminal case No. 3281 of 2021 (IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 506). The …
The petitioners, minor children Rifat Bano and Jigyansh, filed writ petitions after their biometric data were interchanged during Aadhaar enrolment at a Union Bank of India franchise. The error resulted in each child's biometrics being linked to the other's Aadhaar number, a fact admitted by the …
The petitioner Ritu Rai filed a criminal revision challenging the Family Court's order dated 17‑01‑2024 that dismissed her application for maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The High Court held that the Family Court had not applied its mind, had placed the burden of proof …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Vikas Jaiswal under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 60 of the Excise Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that his name appeared only in the confessional statements …
Petitioner Smt. Renu Devi filed writ petition (Writ‑C No. 7884 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Additional Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, Gorakhpur, to decide the pending computer case (No. T202205310319896) against her within a fixed period. The petition …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial) to decide Appeal No.1134 of 2025 expeditiously under Section 59 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016. The court noted that while notices were issued to the opposite party on 17-04-2025, the …
