Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 14801–15000

ALI RAZAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Ali Raza, who is alleged to be a marginal witness to a 1990 gift deed (hibbanama) and is implicated in Crime No. 84 of 2025 under several sections of the B.N.S. The applicant pleaded innocence and offered to cooperate …

RANJEET KUMAR @ RANJEET @ LALLUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ranjeet Kumar under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Crime No. 0337 of 2025. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that his name surfaced only in the confessional statement of …

GOVIND KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Govind Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a cognizance order dated 29‑08‑2024 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Chakiya, Chandauli, along with the accompanying charge‑sheet in a case under the Cow Slaughter Act and the Prevention of Cruelty to …

NIRDOSH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Nirdosh Kumar, who was implicated in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 406, 342 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant claimed innocence and pointed out that co‑accused Sunil …

SURAJ CHANU CHOURASIYA @ SURAJ CHOURASIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Suraj Chou​rasiya, filed a Cr.P.C. Section 482 application seeking to quash the criminal complaint (case 117 of 2018) filed under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act sections 3/4, on the ground that the parties had reached an out‑of‑court compromise which was verified by the …

VISHALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Vishal, the younger brother‑in‑law of the informant, was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 370 of 2025) alleging outraging the modesty of the informant's daughter, among other offences. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal …

SARFARAZ AHMAD AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Sarfaraz Ahmad and two others, who were accused of offences under Sections 420 and 120B IPC. The applicants claimed innocence, asserted that a co‑accused had already received interim …

DARA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Dara Singh filed a writ petition challenging the delay in his promotion to Workshop Superintendent, alleging that the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) had not been constituted as required by law. The petitioner argued that the promotion process, which had been initiated, remained …

RAM KUMARversusSANGEETA GUPTA

The appellant Ram Kumar appealed against a Family Court order dated 4 April 2022 directing him to pay maintenance pendente lite of Rs 10,000 per month to his wife Sangeeta Gupta. While the maintenance order was in force, the appellant filed a restitution petition which he later failed to prosecute, …

BIJENDER SINGH AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Magistrate of Gautam Buddha Nagar to decide their representation dated 23.01.2026, wherein they requested entry of their names as legal heirs in the revenue records. The Court examined the representation and noted that such …

BIJENDER SINGH AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Magistrate of Gautam Buddha Nagar to decide a representation dated 23 January 2026, wherein they requested entry of their names as legal heirs of a deceased in the revenue records. The Court examined the representation and …

VIKRANT THAKURversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vikrant Thakur, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR dated 08‑02‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 103(1), 333, 109(1) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code, including a charge of murder under Section 302. The State, represented by the …

MAYANK RAWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mayank Rawal, filed a writ petition challenging a communication dated 13‑01‑2026 that rejected his application for a caste certificate on the ground of being ‘incomplete’. He argued that the order was non‑speaking and violated natural justice as no reasons were given. The respondents …

SHIVAM YADAV AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Shivam Yadav, Ajeet Yadav and Jagdish Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Uttar Pradesh Police Act seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in Case No. 502 of 2025, alleging that they were falsely implicated and that the FIR contained no specific …

BIJENDRA KUMAR AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Tehsildar of Khatauli to decide on their representation dated 27‑12‑2025 for issuance of English versions of their Scheduled Caste certificates, which had already been issued in Hindi. The State's standing counsel argued that the …

ABHINAYversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Abhinay, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a matter against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petitioner deposited the required cost of Rs.5,000 with the High Court Legal Services Committee as directed by the court. The petitioner’s counsel …

SHIVDAS AND 12 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Meja, Prayagraj, to decide their restoration application (No. RST/9021 of 2025) filed under Section 144 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, within the prescribed period. The petition arose from a …

GAURAV GOYALversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Gaurav Goyal filed a writ petition seeking quashal of an FIR dated 31‑01‑2026 under sections 352 and 109(1) of the BNS, alleging that the dispute with the informant Harsh Garg had been amicably settled by a written settlement deed dated 19‑02‑2026. Both the State’s A.G. and the …

ANIRUDDH ALIAS RAJA ALIAS MAMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Aniruddh Alias Raja Alias Mama, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking release in seven pending criminal cases on the basis of a personal bond and two sureties. He argued that he is a poor person unable to furnish the required sureties and that his arrest in an …

NEERAJ KUMAR @ NIRANJAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Neeraj Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 06‑09‑2025 issued by the Special Judge (Gangster Act) in a case under the Gangster Act. The warrant was issued because the applicant failed to appear on …

MAHAK SINGH AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Tehsildar of Khatauli to decide on their representation dated 27-12-2025 for issuance of English versions of their Scheduled Caste certificates, which had already been issued in Hindi. The State's standing counsel argued that the …

SMT. LEELAWATIversusREGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Smt. Leelawati filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner. The court ordered the petitioner to engage a new counsel because the earlier counsel was a senior advocate. A notice sent on 28 January 2026 was returned undelivered, with the court …

VIPIN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Vipin Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 17.01.2026 and a notice dated 24.08.2024 issued by respondents under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Goondas Act, 1970. The petitioner alleged inherent mistakes in the petition and argued that …

DEVENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Devendra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a stay of an order dated 17-01-2026 and a notice dated 24-08-2024 issued under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Goondas Act, 1970. The petitioner alleged inherent mistakes in the petition that could not be remedied by a supplementary …

DEVENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Devendra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 11‑02‑2026 that alleged offences under IPC sections 74, 333, 351(3) BNS and POCSO Act sections 7 and 8. During the hearing, the petitioner withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that …

RAM NARAYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Narayan, filed a writ petition alleging that the District Magistrate of Muzaffar Nagar had failed to issue him a character certificate despite his representations. The respondent State of U.P. argued that the petition should be dismissed and that the petitioner could simply …

KAISAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Kaisar and Shahmat, were charged in a 2019 case under several IPC offences including rioting, assault and attempt to murder. They filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, asserting innocence and willingness to cooperate with the …

GULAM AND 7 OTHERSversusKEDARNATH

The petitioners Gulam and others filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D) Court No. 31, Azamgarh, to decide an application filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC in suit No. 1658 of 2022, which had remained pending since 2022. The petition argued …

BEENA SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Beena Srivastava filed a writ petition (WRIT C No.10113 of 2026) seeking a direction to the Naib Tehsildar of Lalganj, District Mirzapur, to decide a pending recall application (RST No.1780 of 2024) that had remained undecided for a considerable period. The petitioner argued that the delay violated …

SMT. SAVITRI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Smt. Savitri Devi filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 56722 of 2012) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and no adjournment was sought. The Court held that the cause of action had become stale and the petition was rendered infructuous due to …

LAKSHMI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Lakshmi Devi filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Rules seeking to quash criminal proceedings (S.T. No.464 of 2020) for alleged theft of electricity under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The Electricity Department produced a letter dated 04.04.2018 showing that the offence …

GHANSHYAM RAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Ghanshyam Ray, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the second respondent, the State of U.P., to decide Case No. 10101 of 2025 (Computerized Case No.T202505440110101) without further delay. The petitioner contended that despite a considerable lapse of time, no final decision …

MOHAMMAD JILANI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Commissioner, Prayagraj Mandal, to decide Revision No.824 of 2022 (Mohammad Jilani & others v. Rasheeda Khatoon & others) within a stipulated period. The petition alleged delay in disposal of the …

RAMAKANT PANDEY AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ramakant Pandey and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 15-02-2026 registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 351(2), 352 and 110 of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing the petitioners withdrew their prayer to quash the FIR and …

YOGESH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Yogesh and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 12 of 2026) arising from Crime No. 0059 of 2025, which were instituted under Sections 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the B.N.S. The applicants argued that they had …

MANISH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Manish and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 27‑01‑2026 under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 324(2). The petitioners claimed that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and executed a compromise affidavit on 03‑02‑2026, arguing that …

TULSI PATHAK AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Tulsi Pathak and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking quash of an FIR dated 21-02-2026, registered under sections 61(2) and 87 BNS, alleging that the alleged victim’s modesty was forcibly removed and no consent was given. The State, …

RAMJI SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, a bona‑fide consumer of electricity, alleged that a faulty smart meter generated erroneous bills of Rs. 18,526 for February‑March 2025 and Rs. 1,28,025 for June 2025, despite regular payment of dues. He submitted multiple representations to the electricity department, which were …

NAWAB ANSARI @ GUDDU WARSI @ FITWELL TAILORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Nawab Ansari (also known as Guddu Warsi and Fitwell Tailor) in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 411, 413, 414, 420, 467 and 468 of the IPC and Sections 41 and 102 of the CrPC. The applicant claimed innocence, stating …

SMT. SWARNLATA JAIN AND 3 OTHERSversusSANDEEP GODHA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 challenging the appellate court’s order that rejected their application filed under Order 41 Rule 19 of the Civil Procedure Code. The High Court examined whether that order was appealable and whether it warranted interference. It held that the order is …

SMT RAMWATIversusHIMANSHU AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Smt Ramwati filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging a stay order dated 19 February 2026 issued by the District Judge, Etah, which had stayed an interim injunction granted by the Trial Court on 13 January 2026. The petitioner argued that the stay was improperly granted …

SMT. RAMWATIversusSHASHIKANT KUMAR MATHUR AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 19‑02‑2026 of the District Judge, Etah, which stayed an interim injunction granted by the trial court on 13‑01‑2026. The petitioner contended that the stay was erroneous because the court had not examined the merits of the appeal and …

HUMAYUUN ABBAS ZAIDIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Humayuun Abbas Zaidi, filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 18 February 2026 issued by Respondent No.3. The respondents contended that the petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy under Section 83(9) of the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and …

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusP. K. AGRAWAL AND OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for the revised call. No substantive arguments or evidence were presented. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the petition. The judges, however, granted the petitioners liberty to file a …

SURAJ AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER

Petitioners Suraj and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 25.01.2026 registered under sections 137(2), 87, 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought relief against the FIR but later the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw …

VIPINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vipin, the husband of a deceased woman, who was accused under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for dowry‑related offences. The applicant contended that the death was a suicide, …

M/S PURE POWER TURBO BATTERIES PVT. LTD.versusSTATE OF U P AND 4 OTHERS

M/S Pure Power Turbo Batteries Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 24441 of 2018) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petition was listed on the top ten cases but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and …

PAPPU @ MAHIPALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant, Pappu @ Mahipal, filed Criminal Appeal No. 724 of 2006 against the State of U.P. The matter was heard by a bench comprising Hon’ble Justice Siddharth and Hon’ble Justice Jai Krishna Upadhyay of the Allahabad High Court. The court dismissed the appeal without providing detailed …

HAKIM SINGH BAGHELversusSTATE OF U.P. and OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition in 2008 which remained pending for many years. The High Court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared nor was the case marked to show …

MEWATI DEVIversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mewati Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Ghazipur, to decide an application filed under Section 67-A(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Case No.14179 of 2025). The petition was filed after the application had already been submitted …

KRISHNAKANT RAIversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Krishnakant Rai, challenged a No Objection Certificate (NOC) issued by the District Magistrate, Jhansi, in favour of a private respondent and a subsequent order rejecting his candidature for a BPCL retail outlet. Earlier writ petitions (Writ‑C No.330/2026 and Writ‑C No.36640/2024) …

MUHAMMAD SHAKIBversusMUHAMMAD JAVED KHAN AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Muhammad Shakib, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a directive to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No.7, Bareilly, to decide a pending interim injunction application filed by the plaintiff‑respondents in Original Suit No. 309 of 2024. The petitioner …

MOHD NISHAT @ BILALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohd Nishat @ Bilal, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a matter that the court found could be addressed under Section 211 of the Uttar Pradesh Municipality Act, 1916. The respondent, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, argued that the appropriate …

SHYAM SINGH KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shyam Singh Kushwaha, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the State and the Nagar Ayukt to (a) refrain from interfering with his peaceful possession of land in Mathura, (b) allow him to construct a tin shed on his shop premises, and (c) decide a representation he had …

MOHD FARID KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohd Farid Khan, challenged a sale notice issued by a financial institution for recovery of a loan of Rs.28,97,633.05 under the SARFAESI Act. He offered to pay the full amount if granted a time‑extension. The bank agreed to accept an initial payment of Rs.8 lakh by 18 April 2026 and …

CHANDRA PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Chandra Pal Singh filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Chairman/Principal Secretary of the State Level Caste Scrutiny Committee, U.P., to decide his appeal dated 16 July 2021, filed under a 1996 Government Order, within a time‑bound period. The State, through its standing …

NISHANT JOSHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nishant Joshi and Abhishek Singh, who were arrested under Section 2(b)(i)/3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in a case registered at Police Station Marka, Banda. The applicants contended that the …

SABIYA AND 4 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the High Court's assistance to enforce an injunction order previously passed by the trial court. The petition alleged that the lower court had not complied with its own injunction. The High Court examined the petition and found it to be …

NASIR AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Nasir Ahmad, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Tehsildar (Judicial) of Bilari, Moradabad, to decide his restoration application (Recall No.7104 of 2023, Computer Case No.T202313540207104) which had remained pending for a considerable time. The petitioner argued that …

SMT. GITA DEVIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Gita Devi, filed a writ petition challenging the Railway Accident Claims Tribunal's order that released only 25% (₹2,00,000) of the ₹8,00,000 compensation awarded for the death of her son in a railway accident on 15 September 2019. She argued that the partial release was …

SADASHIV MANI TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sadashiv Mani Tripathi, filed a writ petition seeking a character certificate from the District Magistrate, Kushinagar, alleging that despite multiple representations, the authority had not issued the certificate. The respondents, the State of U.P. and others, contended that there …

RAKESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Rakesh Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a character certificate from the District Magistrate, Agra, alleging that his multiple representations had been ignored. The petitioner argued that the respondent authority failed to issue the certificate despite his grievances. The respondents contended …

MAHAVEER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Mahaveer Singh filed a writ petition before the High Court of Allahabad challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three other respondents. The petition was argued before the Court and, after hearing, counsel for the petitioner prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The Court …

RAM DAS AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ram Das and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a governmental action. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners requested that the petition be dismissed on the ground that it was not pressed. The Court accepted this request and dismissed the …

MANTU SAH AND 5 OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioners sought a larger immediate release of compensation awarded by the Railway Accident Claims Tribunal for the death of Shanti Devi, the wife of petitioner No.1, in a railway accident on 20 June 2023. The Tribunal had ordered only ₹80,000 to be released immediately, with the balance of …

SMT MONIKA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a married adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their marital life and to provide protection against alleged harassment. The court noted that the marriage was solemnized with free consent and no FIR had been lodged. Relying …

RUPESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rupesh, the husband of a woman who allegedly committed suicide by hanging after a dispute over dowry. The prosecution had charged him under Sections 85, 80(2) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. …

SMT SONALI YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, a married adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide protection against alleged harassment. They claimed their marriage on 28‑02‑2026 was consensual, with no FIR filed, and alleged …

MANJU DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Manju Devi and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The counsel for the applicants informed the court that the parties had reached a settlement and had filed a fresh petition/application. Consequently, the court was asked to …

SHAMIM AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Shamim Ahmad filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petition sought relief under writ jurisdiction. The Court examined the pleadings and observed that the dispute centered on factual issues that were …

APURVA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Apurva Singh filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Tehsildar, Judicial, Ballia Sadar, to decide a pending mutation case (No.11136 of 2025) that had been filed under sub‑rule (7) of Rules 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016. The petitioner argued that the Tahsildar had failed to …

MOHAMMAD AADILversusSTATE OF U.P.

Mohammad Aadil applied for bail before the Allahabad High Court in Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9295 of 2026, seeking release on charges under IPC sections 302, 64, 123 and IT Act section 66E. The applicant alleged that the case was fabricated, that the alleged victim had falsely …

SHATRUGHAN MAURYAversusNAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD JAUNPUR AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Shatrughan Maurya filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) of Jaunpur to decide the pending Nagar Palika Appeal No.06/2025 and to protect his houses until that decision is rendered. The petitioner contended that the appeal had been …

BIPIN KUMAR MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petition (Writ‑A No. 12870 of 2021) filed by Bipin Kumar Maurya against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others was disposed of by the Hon’ble Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery on 18 March 2026. The order directs that for details the court’s earlier order in Writ‑A No. 10054 of 2021 should be …

AMOD KUMAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Amod Kumar Pandey, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing arguments, counsel for the petitioner requested the dismissal of the petition on the ground that it was not pressed. The Court considered the request and found that the petition indeed lacked the …

NOOR ALAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

Petitioner Noor Alam filed a writ petition seeking a directive to the Up‑Ziladhikari of Tehsil‑Kasya, District Kushinagar, to decide a restoration application dated 02‑Nov‑2023 that had been dismissed in default on 25‑Oct‑2023. The petitioner argued that despite the lapse of considerable time, no …

MAHANT RAM SINGH DURGA MANDIR TRUSTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Mahant Ram Singh Durga Mandir Trust claimed ownership of a 0.544‑hectare parcel of land in Diha village, Prayagraj, on which a temple and a house were constructed about fifty years ago. The Trust, belonging to the OBC category, filed an application on 29 January 2026 before the Sub‑Divisional …

RAJESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar applied online for a character certificate, which was rejected by the competent authority. He challenged the rejection through a writ petition, alleging that the order was non‑speaking and failed to apply the guidelines laid down by the High Court in Anil Kumar v. State of …

JITENDRA @ JEETU @ JEETAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Jitendra, accused of offences under Sections 302, 201 and 404 of the IPC, alleging murder and related crimes. The applicant claimed innocence, lack of criminal history, and that a co-accused had already been granted bail. The prosecution …

KAUSHALYA DEVIversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Tehsildar of Padrauna to decide a pending mutation application (Case No.3077 of 2022) expeditiously. The petitioner argued that under sub‑rule (7) of Rule 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, the Tehsildar must dispose of undisputed …

MOHD. ASLAM ANSARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove alleged illegal encroachments on land in Mau district. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel argued that the matter had already been concluded under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, and that the …

GYANTI DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioners challenged the Railway Accident Claims Tribunal’s order that only ₹80,000 of the ₹8,00,000 compensation awarded for the death of petitioner No.1’s husband be released immediately, with the balance placed in a fixed deposit for three years. They argued that the partial release was …

TAUFEEQversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Taufeeq, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with Crime No. 283 of 2025, which involved charges under several sections of the B.N.S. He asserted his innocence and relied on an interim protection order dated 09‑09‑2025. The State …

SMT MAMTA DAGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Smt. Mamta Dagar filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking recall of a criminal proceeding. The High Court heard the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State, issued a notice to the applicant, and directed that the matter be listed for further hearing …

RAJESH KUMAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Rajesh Kumar Shukla challenged a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 06‑06‑2022 issued by the Additional Sessions Judge in a case under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3(1)(10) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appeal was filed under Section 14‑A(1) of the SC/ST Act …

ABDUL GANIversusBRAHMANAND YADAV

The petitioner Abdul Gani filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 seeking a mandamus directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Shahganj, Jaunpur to decide Civil Suit No.1491 of 2023 within a fixed period and to prevent interference with his possession of disputed land. The High Court …

SMT. RADHAversusRANJEET AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt. Radha filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (South) Kanpur Nagar to decide MACP No. 862 of 2020, which had been pending since 2020. The petitioner argued that the prolonged delay served no useful purpose and requested expeditious …

YUSUFversusSTATE OF U.P.

Yusuf was charged under Sections 351(2), 123 and 64(1) of the B.N.S. for allegedly raping a divorcee woman after taking her to a graveyard, during which a video showing the victim in a nude position was recovered and certified under Section 65‑B of the Indian Evidence Act. The defence argued that …

KAMALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the respondents to incorporate a 2024 order into the revenue records. The petitioner relied on a 2015 judgment (Ramashish v. Additional Commissioner) which held that any order, whether final or interim, must be entered in the revenue …

SMT. KHUSHBU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Khushbu and another, married on 29 November 2025 and alleged that the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents were threatening and harassing them for having married. They sought a writ of mandamus to prevent any interference in their marital life and to obtain police …

OMBIR SINGH AMBEDKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ombir Singh Ambedkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Ghaziabad to decide a pending declaratory suit (Case No. 291 of 2024) expeditiously. The High Court examined the request and noted that the suit had been pending …

VYASMUNIversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vyasmuni, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending case (No. T202605440402539) filed under Section 67-A of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a …

GANGOTRI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Gangotri Devi filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending revenue case (No.T202605440402532) filed under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a considerable lapse of …

DEENANATHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Deenanath filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending case (No. T202605440402541) filed under Section 67‑A of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner contended that an inordinate amount of time had …

DEENANATHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Deenanath, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending case (No.T202605440402543) filed under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that an inordinate amount …

SWAMINATHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Swaminath, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a revenue case (Case No. T202605440402536) filed under Section 67‑A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner …

GAGANDEVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gagandev, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending case (No.T202605440402545) filed under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a considerable lapse …

BAHADURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Bahadur, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a revenue matter (Case No. T202605440402538) filed under Section 67‑A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a …

SUBHASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Subhash, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a revenue case (Case No. T202605440402533) filed under Section 67‑A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a considerable …

VIJAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vijay, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a case (No.T202605440402551) filed under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a considerable lapse of …

SUKDEVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sukdev, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending case (No.T202605440402540) filed under Section 67‑A of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a …

HARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Hari filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending case (No. T202605440402547) filed under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a considerable lapse of time, no …

GANESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Ganesh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending revenue case (No. T202605440402549) filed under Section 67‑A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that an …

BUNELAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Bunela, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a revenue case (No. T202605440402531) filed under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a considerable lapse …

SUSHILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sushil, has been incarcerated since 13 November 2025 in ten separate criminal cases filed under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. Being indigent, he is unable to furnish the twenty sureties normally required for bail in each case. He previously obtained a …

UMESH AND 2 OTHERSversusVINAY SINGH YADAV AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners Umesh and two others filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gorakhpur, to decide pending applications filed under Order 39 Rule‑4, and Order 39 Rules‑1 and‑2 of the CPC in Original Suit No. 1696 of 2022. The petitioners argued …

KRISHNA RAWATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Krishna Rawat filed a writ petition challenging the authority’s order rejecting his online application for a character certificate. He argued that the order was passed without applying mind and ignored the guidelines laid down by this Court in Anil Kumar v. State of U.P. (Writ‑C No. …

SANDEEP KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sandeep Kumar, who was arrested under sections 61(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352 and 69 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged sexual assault and related offences. The applicant's counsel argued that the FIR was false, delayed, and motivated …

AWADHESH KUMAR TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition in 2018 which remained pending for several years. The High Court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and warned of dismissal if the cause of action no longer existed or counsel failed to appear. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared …

RAJ VIKARAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Raj Vikaram Singh, who passed her High School Examination in 2021, discovered that her mother's name was incorrectly entered as "Amamika Singh" in her Class XII and Migration Certificates, while the correct name "Anamika Singh" appears on the High School mark sheet. She filed a writ …

SUNIL KUMAR KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sunil Kumar Kushwaha, who was arrested under sections 64(2)F, 64(2)(M) and 351(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Act, 2023, alleging false implication in a crime. The applicant contended that the FIR was lodged seven months after the alleged …

EBAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ebal Singh, sought bail in a criminal case (Cr. No. 640 of 2022) involving charges of rioting, criminal force, criminal misappropriation, voluntarily causing hurt, attempt to murder and murder under Sections 147, 148, 452, 323, 307 and 302 of the IPC. He had been in jail for four …

HEMSHANKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Hemshankar filed a writ petition seeking a character certificate from the Superintendent of Police, Bareilly, alleging that his multiple representations had been ignored. The State of U.P. and other respondents opposed the petition. The Court, without examining the merits, directed the petitioner to …

SAURABH VOHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Saurabh Vohra, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the Collector/District Magistrate of Gautam Budh Nagar (respondent 3) to enforce a recovery certificate dated 6 January 2026 issued under Section 40 of the Real Estate (Regulation …

RAMESH KUMAR MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ramesh Kumar Maurya, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 10109 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petition was heard before Hon’ble Justice Prakash Padia. After hearing the arguments, counsel …

SHASHI JAIN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Shashi Jain filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Collector/District Magistrate of Gautam Budh Nagar to enforce a recovery certificate dated 06.10.2023 issued under Section 40 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, pursuant to an …

SANJEEV AGARWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHER

The petitioner, Sanjeev Agarwal, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Additional Commissioner (Administrative), Agra Division, to decide Appeal No.2020 of 2023 (Computerized Case No.C202301000002020) expeditiously. The petitioner argued that a considerable period had elapsed without a …

SMT. RAMSHREEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHER

Smt. Ramshree filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Additional Commissioner (Administrative), Agra Division, to decide Revision No.1925 of 2025 (Computer Case No.C202501000001925) expeditiously. The petitioner argued that despite considerable time lapse, no …

SMT. SAMREEN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER

The petitioners, Samreen and another, married on 18 March 2024 and registered the marriage the next day, alleging that the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents were threatening and harassing them for having married. They filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not …

RAM NIWAS SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The appellant, Ram Niwas Singh, claimed that his appointment as Assistant Clerk in a Higher Secondary School in 1979 was valid and that the recovery of his salary by the State was unlawful. The dispute centered on whether the post to which he was appointed actually existed and whether the District …

SMT. PREM KUMARI SINGHversusVIJAY BAHADUR AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a suit seeking an injunction to stop respondents from constructing a road over her private property. Although the trial court had not granted an injunction, a commissioner order dated 24.03.2022 prohibited construction. Respondents began construction on 07.03.2026, leading the …

POOJA GOSWAMI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Pooja Goswami and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 5 September 2024, the summons and cognizance order dated 7 October 2024, and the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.14530 of 2024) …

SANDEEP CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Sandeep Chauhan, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 627 of 2021) involving offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376, 120B and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The first bail application had been dismissed by the High Court on 16 February 2023. No counsel …

RESHMA PALversusUMESH PAL

The appellant, a divorced wife, challenged an ex-parte decree of divorce that did not address her claim for maintenance. She sought to appeal the judgment solely to obtain maintenance, while the respondent argued that the Family Court's decision was correct on facts and law. The court noted that …

AKHATARI BEGAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Akhatari Begam, filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a domestic violence case (case No. 415 of 2019) from the Judicial Magistrate Court in Jalaun to another district court and also requested a stay of proceedings. No counsel …

RAMESH CHANDRA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear or present any counsel when the case was listed, even after a revised call. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that had been previously granted. …

BRIJENDRA SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Petitioners Brijendra Singh and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the petitioners argued that subsequent developments had rendered the petition ineffective. The court examined the claim of infructuosity. Finding that the petition no longer had any operative …

RISHIKANTversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 581 of 2021) involving offences under sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The State argued that the trial was at an advanced stage, with defence witness examination underway, and that the applicant's earlier …

RAMDULAR RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ramdular Ram, filed a writ petition seeking payment of salary arrears for the period 2010‑2016. The State of U.P. and other respondents rejected the claim on two grounds: a disciplinary inquiry against the petitioner was still pending, and the original service records indicated that …

SMT. PAKKO AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioners purchased a 740.55 sq m plot, described it as residential in the sale deed and paid stamp duty at residential rates. An inspection on 18‑02‑2008 found a saw‑machine on the site, leading the Stamp Authority to issue a deficiency stamp duty demand and an equal penalty under Section …

RAGHUNATH PRASAD PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 15902 of 2010) was filed by Raghunath Prasad Pal against the State of U.P. and others. The petitioner's counsel, Chandra Dutt and Pradeep Verma, did not appear before the court. Respondent No. 5 was represented by counsel Saumya Mandhyan. The court noted the absence of …

DURGA PRASAD ASTHANAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Durga Prasad Asthana, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear even after a revised call. The Court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the petition. However, the Court granted the petitioner liberty to file a restoration application within one …

JAGVIR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jagvir Singh, filed Writ Petition No. 40488 of 2014 before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed for hearing, but no representative of the petitioner appeared even after a revised call. The court noted the absence of the petitioner and proceeded to dismiss the petition on …

SMT. SANJA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Sanja Devi, filed a writ petition in 2011 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner's counsel repeatedly sought adjournments, submitting illness slips on 11-02-2020, 19-02-2026, and again on the day of a peremptory hearing. The court noted that the petition concerned …

RAJESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition in 2016 which remained pending for several years. The High Court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and warned that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared nor was the case marked …

UNION OF INDIA THUR. SECY. AND OTHERSversusSMT. SHYAMA SHUKLA AND ANOTHER

The Union of India, as employer, challenged two orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT): one dated 2 August 2010 that set aside a minor punishment imposed on employee Shyama Shukla, and a subsequent order dated 11 May 2012 dismissing a review of that decision. The petitioners sought to …

AJAB SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Ajab Singh, filed Writ Petition No. 4025 of 2010 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State's standing counsel was present. The court noted that the matter, dating back to 2010, appeared to have become infructuous due to the …

ANGAD CHAMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Angad Chamar, filed a second bail application in Criminal Case No. 03 of 2020, which involved offences under Sections 376D and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. The first bail application (No. 32712 of 2020) had been rejected by the Allahabad High Court on …

AKHILESH AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 2396 of 2016) arising from an FIR that alleged dowry demand and harassment in a matrimonial dispute. The FIR named the husband (applicant No.1) and five of his …

SADA NAND SHUKLA ADVOCATEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 62718 of 2010 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another respondent. The matter was listed for hearing, but on the date of hearing no petitioner or their counsel appeared. The respondent counsel, including R.K. Shukla …

MAHESH ALIAS MUNNA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant Mahesh alias Munna Yadav was convicted for murder and offences under the Arms Act arising from a land‑dispute‑related shooting that killed Bhola Yadav and Vinod Yadav. The prosecution relied on the informant’s statement, medical post‑mortem reports, forensic ballistics linking the …

USMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Usman, sought bail for charges of murder, criminal conspiracy and criminal intimidation (IPC sections 302, 120‑B and 506) in a case registered as Crime No. 60 of 2019. This was the third bail application filed; the first two had been rejected by the same High Court. No counsel …

VINOD KUMAR JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P.AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ C No. 20159 of 2014) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to prosecute the petition, while counsel for the respondents was present. The Court noted the absence of representation for the petitioners and …

UMA SHANKAR TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Petitioner Uma Shankar Tiwari filed Writ Petition No. 73919 of 2010 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The petition was listed for hearing but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, even after a revised call. The Court …

RAM BACHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking the removal of encroachments on several plots of land in Chandauli district. The State submitted an affidavit showing that the revenue authorities had already set aside a 1997 order, restored the plots to their original category, and …

PARASU RAM SINGH AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition in 2011 which remained pending for over a decade. The High Court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioners nor their counsel appeared, nor was the case …

ZAHID HUSAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Zahid Husain, charged in Crime No. 430 of 2022 under multiple IPC sections, the POCSO Act, the Moral Traffic (Prevention) Act and the Juvenile Justice Act, applied for an enlargement of bail during the trial. This was his second bail application; the first one (No. 33343 of 2022) had been rejected …

ISHWARI PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 ORS.

The petitioner, Ishwari Prasad, filed a writ petition in 2016 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and six other respondents. The case was listed as an old pending matter and a notice was issued that all cases pending up to 2022 must be taken up in the …

KULDEEP NARAYANversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. AND 13 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kuldeep Narayan, filed a writ petition (WRIT-C No. 54797 of 2013) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the petition. Consequently, the Court found that the petition lacked prosecution. The judges dismissed the writ petition for …

BHARAT BHUSHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 ORS.

The petitioner filed a writ petition in 2016 which remained pending for several years. The High Court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and that non-appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared nor was the case marked to show …

ARUN KUMAR @ RINKUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Arun Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to summon his service record and to appoint him under the Dying‑in‑Harness Rules, 1974, for a compassionate appointment. He alleged that an order dated 24‑08‑2015 requiring him to produce documents had not …

SMT. MEENAKSHI PANDEY AND 41 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ-C No. 67376 of 2013) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two other respondents. No petitioner appeared in court even after the revised call, indicating a lack of prosecution of the petition. The Court observed that …

ARUN KUMAR PATHAKversusDIOS AND 2 ORS.

The appellant, Arun Kumar Pathak, challenged a single judge’s order that denied his request to continue in a teaching post after the short‑term vacancy he filled became substantive. The court examined the procedure prescribed under the U.P. Secondary Education Service Commission (Removal of …

ANIKET DIXIT @ NANDU AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants and the State entered into an amicable settlement regarding offences under Sections 147, 452, 323, 504, 506 and 427 IPC arising from Crime No. 4931 of 2017. They filed a compromise application before the trial court, which was verified and reported to the High Court. Relying on …

RAJ KUMAR NAGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

This is an application under Section 482 filed before the Allahabad High Court by Raj Kumar Nagar against the State of U.P. and another. The application was registered as Application U/S 482 No. 40887 of 2014 and was heard by Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma, J. The order states that the present …

RASHID ANWARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rashid Anwar, filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a criminal case (S.T. No. 226 of 2020) to another Sessions Division and to stay the proceedings. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, and …

MANISHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Manish, filed a second bail application (No. 38756 of 2023) seeking release on bail for offences under IPC sections 364, 302, 201 and 34 in Mahroni police station, Lalitpur. The first bail application (No. 36603 of 2022) had been rejected by the same court. No counsel appeared for the …

JAGDEESH PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Jagdeesh Prasad and Raj Kumar Nagar sought to quash a revision order dated 30‑08‑2014 passed by the Additional Session Judge (Special Judge, SC/ST Act) which had set aside a magistrate's order rejecting a protest by the informant. The informant had alleged that the applicants forged …

CHHATRAPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 ORS

The petitioner, a retired Technical Grade‑II employee, filed a writ petition seeking the release of his pending retirement dues, including pension, gratuity and commutation amount, which had been retained by the respondents despite the absence of any disciplinary punishment. The High Court noted …

SMT NEELAMversusSTATE OF U.P. NAD 5 OTHERS

Smt Neelam filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a criminal case (State vs Indrapal & others) from Hasanpur, Amroha to Moradabad. The application required service of notice on opposite parties, but the court’s office report indicated that no …

VINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

A writ petition filed in 2016 by Vinod Kumar against the State of U.P. and three others remained pending for several years. The High Court listed the matter among the oldest pending cases and issued a notice requiring the petitioner’s counsel to appear or to mark that the cause of action still …

ANKITA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Ankita Singh filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a criminal case (Cr.No. 17114 of 2023) from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur to Ballia, alleging that staying in Ghazipur would cause her irreparable loss. The application listed several …

SAURABH JAISAWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an application to cancel the bail granted on 18‑Feb‑2025 to Jai Singh Yadav in Crime No.555 of 2024, which involved offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act. The applicant, Saurabh Jaisawal, alleged that the accused misused his liberty by sending indecent and threatening …

AMIT KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking quash of a charge sheet and stay of proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 307, 504, 506, 354A, 354B IPC and the D.P. Act. The parties had amicably settled the dispute and filed a …

SMT. TANMAYEE RAGHUVANSHIversusSHUBHAM SINGH

The applicant, Smt. Tanmayee Raghuvanshi, filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a criminal case (Case No. 172/2023) from the District and Sessions Judge, Jaunpur to the District and Sessions Judge, Varanasi, alleging potential irreparable loss …

DHIRENDRA KUMAR SINGHversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the application had become infructuous. The court considered the submission and found no merit in proceeding further. Consequently, the court dismissed the …

DESHRAJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Deshraj, filed a second anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 610 of 2016) under Section 3364‑A of the Indian Penal Code, seeking release if arrested. The application was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, with counsel Irshad Ahmad …

THE NAGRIK SAHAKARI AWAS SAMITI LTD.versusSTATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. AND OTHERS

The Nagrik Sahakari Awas Samiti Ltd filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and no adjournment was sought. The court held that the cause of action had become stale due to the petitioner's failure to press the petition. Consequently, …

SONU KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Sonu Kumar, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.475 of 2022) involving charges under Sections 363 and 376(3) of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant was not present when the application was listed, while the State’s counsel appeared. …

IRFAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court examined an appeal against a Sessions Court conviction of Irfan, Faeem and Saleem for murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and abetment (Sec. 120B IPC) based on a FIR lodged 49 hours after the incident. The prosecution alleged the accused deliberately ran over the deceased with a tractor, supported …

NITIN BANSALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The revisionist, Nitin Bansal, appealed the Additional Principal Judge’s order under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. that required him to pay Rs 6,000 per month to his wife and Rs 4,000 to his minor daughter. He argued that he was unemployed, had lost his investment, and that the amount was excessive …

SMT. PINKI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Smt. Pinki Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act from the Judicial Magistrate, Bhoganipur, Kanpur Dehat to another district, …

SAGARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Sagar filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for either party, though the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The court examined the trial court’s report dated 13‑02‑2026, which indicated that the trial had …

SMT. PINKI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The applicant, Smt. Pinki Devi, filed a criminal transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a domestic violence case (Case No. 121 of 2020) from the Judicial Magistrate Court, Bhoganipur, Kanpur Dehat to the District Court, Fatehpur, invoking Section 12 of …

ARUNversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Arun filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 42873 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for either party, but the learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The court examined the trial court report dated 11 February 2026, which indicated …

AEYSHA BEGAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Aeysha Begam, filed a criminal transfer application (No. 634 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court seeking transfer of the trial. Counsel for the applicant, Om Prakash and Shrikrishna, appeared along with counsel for the State and another respondent. During the hearing, the …

MAHESH LAL YADAV AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The writ petition filed by Mahesh Lal Yadav and others in 2019 remained pending for several years. The High Court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be taken up and warned that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. The petitioners' counsel neither appeared nor …

TAUFIQversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 43844 of 2011 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another respondent. The petition remained pending for several years and, on the date of hearing, no representative of the petitioner appeared before the court. The …

MADHU VACHASPATI UCHCHATAR MADHYAMIK VIDYALAYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Madhu Vachaspati Uchchatar Madhyamik Vidyalaya, filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. The petitioner argued that the school’s existence was not recognized, seeking relief. Respondent No.3, the District Magistrate, subsequently acknowledged the …

SANJAY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Sanjay and another filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summons issued in Criminal Case No. 425 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The trial magistrate had issued the summons on …

RAHULversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Rahul filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 42940 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. The trial of the underlying case had already been concluded on 26 March 2025, as per the report dated 11 February 2026 from the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Rampur. No …

SURENDRA RAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Surendra Ray filed a transfer application under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a family court case (No. 1022 of 2021) from Varanasi to the District Court, Ghazipur. The High Court directed the applicant to deposit Rs. 25,000 in the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, but …

DHARMENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Dharmendra, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 44434 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. No parties appeared before the court except the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. The court examined the trial report dated 19 January 2026, which …

KALLU @ AYUBversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Kallu @ Ayub sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 378 of 2021) involving offences under Sections 302, 201 and 120‑B of the IPC. This was his second bail application; the first, filed in 2021, had been rejected on merit. The prosecution argued that the accused’s statements had …

PRASHANTER DHAMA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Prashanter Dhama and others, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal case (Criminal Case No.33361 of 2023) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh, which involved offences under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 354‑Ka and D.P. Act …

DURGA SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The writ petition filed by Durga Singh and others in 2018 remained pending without any appearance by the petitioners. The High Court had issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be taken up and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. The petitioners neither appeared …

BHURA @ NARENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Bhura @ Narendra, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 267 of 2020) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 of the IPC. This was his second bail application; the first (No. 44235 of 2022) had been rejected on merit. Counsel argued that the trial was progressing …

FIROZ AHAMADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Firoz Ahamad, who is accused under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the IPC for murder. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the case rests solely on circumstantial evidence, and that no substantive material besides …

SMT SANYUKTA SHAHI AND ANOTHERversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

Smt Sanyukta Shahi and another filed Criminal Revision No. 2244 of 2024 against the State of U.P. and another. The revision was listed before Hon’ble Justice Harvir Singh. The court disposed of the revision by referring to the order dated 18 March 2026 in the connected Criminal Revision No. 3302 of …

RAJEEV KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition in 2018 before the Allahabad High Court. The case was listed as an old pending matter and a notice was issued that such cases would be heard and dismissed as infructuous if no appearance was made. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared nor was the case marked …