Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 15001–15200
The petitioners, having already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs. 18,000 with arrears, moved the High Court to withdraw their writ petition. The petition was consequently dismissed as withdrawn. The court directed that the benefits already granted to the petitioners shall continue until their …
The applicant sought anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under Sections 376, 452, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, claiming that he had been in jail for four years without any witness examination. The court noted that this was the second bail application and that the …
In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 51064 of 2023, the petitioner Shageer (represented by counsel Abhinav Dwivedi and Mohd. Jamshed Khan) sought bail for the accused Mr. Ashish Kumar Tripathi. The State of U.P., represented by A.G.A. G.A., opposed the bail. During the hearing, counsel for the …
The husband, Mayank Saxena, appealed a Family Court order directing him to pay Rs.15,000 per month as maintenance to his wife, Sweta Saxena, under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. The parties mediated at the High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre and entered into a settlement agreement on …
The applicant, Anuj Rastogi, filed a criminal transfer application (No. 796 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. Although three counsels were listed for the applicant, none appeared to press the application. The matter had earlier been referred to the court's Mediation and Conciliation Centre, …
The petitioner, Om Prakash Yadav, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Alok Kumar Srivastava, expressed that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition. The court considered the petitioner's request to withdraw the …
Akash filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging a Family Court order dated 4 May 2024 that dismissed his maintenance application, noting the matter was scheduled for final judgment on 18 May 2024. The High Court scheduled the case for a fresh hearing on …
The Union of India appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking condonation of a 375‑day delay in filing an appeal against a Commercial Court judgment dismissing its Section 34 application. The appellant claimed it was unaware of the …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning and cognizance order dated 12‑12‑2023 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kairana, in a case under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that …
The applicant, Subhash Chandra Mishra, filed a contempt application against the Director of Basic Education, Mr. Pratap Singh Baghel, alleging non‑compliance with a writ order dated 25 January 2024. The respondent appeared before the court and submitted a compliance affidavit stating that the …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained a revision petition filed by Gaurav Anand against an order passed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner sought relief from that order, but the respondent's counsel argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy by filing an appeal …
The applicant, Aniruddacharya Chela Bhagwan Das, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant had already been granted bail by the Sessions …
The applicant, Vivek Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The trial court had already acquitted the applicant on 8 October 2024, as reflected in the …
The petitioner, Gaurav Agnihotri, son of the then Manager of the Committee of Management of a college, challenged his appointment alleging that it was not made through a fair process. The petitioner argued that his relationship with the Manager, who had an effective role in appointments, rendered …
Rahul filed a criminal revision challenging the Sessions Judge's order granting interim maintenance of Rs.4500 per month to the opposite party under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The trial court had based the interim award on a prima facie assessment of …
The revisionist, Vikesh Shahi, challenged a Family Court order granting Rs.3,500 per month to his wife and Rs.2,500 per month to his son as maintenance under Section 125 CrPC, alleging that the total amount was excessive and that he was mentally unstable and unemployed. The opposite parties …
The petitioner, Suresh, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs 18,000 with arrears by the authorities. Consequently, his counsel moved to withdraw the writ petition, stating it had become infructuous. The High Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The …
The revisionist, Smt. Jyoti Singh, filed a revision under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging the dismissal of her maintenance application by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Firozabad. She contended that the trial court erred by not considering her unemployment …
Petitioner Anil Kumar had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs.18,000 with arrears, rendering the relief sought in the writ petition unnecessary. Counsel for the petitioner moved to withdraw the petition on this basis. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and directed that …
The applicant, Dilshad, sought bail in a case (Crime No. 278 of 2024) alleging his involvement in a fatal stabbing under IPC Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190 and 103(1). The prosecution alleged that co‑accused first stabbed the deceased and that Dilshad, along with another accused, assaulted the victim …
The revision petition filed by Abhishek Sharma challenged a Family Court order granting monthly maintenance of Rs.10,000 to his wife and Rs.5,000 to their child, alleging the amount was excessive and that the wife, a qualified MBA graduate, voluntarily left the matrimonial home and could support …
The applicant, charged under Section 302 IPC and Section 4 of the Arms Act for the murder of his wife, sought bail, claiming innocence and alleging a delayed FIR and violation of his Article 21 rights after three years of incarceration. The applicant argued that the post‑mortem indicated a death …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu Sharma in a criminal case (No. 99 of 2025) under IPC sections 103(1), 238 and 140(1). Sharma claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that he was not named in the FIR and that his name appeared only in statements of three witnesses …
Lekhraj filed a criminal revision challenging orders that dismissed his claims in a domestic violence petition and a related criminal matter. He argued that no domestic violence was committed by him or his family and that the petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic …
The applicant, Chavindra Alias Machchhar, was arrested in connection with the murder of the informant's son under Section 103(1) BNS of the IPC and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged enmity and presented CCTV footage showing the applicant near the crime scene, but no eyewitness …
The applicant, Varun Kumar Mishra, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and eight other respondents. The matter was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, but the applicant's counsel failed to appear …
The petitioner, Smt. Manju Upadhyay, filed a Section 482 CrPC application to set aside an order dated 04‑07‑2024 of the Additional Sessions Judge (Special Judge under the POCSO Act) which had treated her Section 156(3) CrPC application for FIR registration as a complaint. She alleged that her three …
The revision petition was filed challenging an order dated 5 June 2024 of the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court No. 4, Agra, which granted maintenance of Rs 12,000 per month to the minor son of the petitioner until he reaches majority. The petitioner argued that the amount was excessive and …
The husband, Mohit Kumar Wadhwa, filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging a Family Court order that directed him to pay Rs 20,000 per month to his wife and later Rs 25,000 per month. He contended that his actual earnings as a labourer in his father's …
The victim testified that she is lawfully married to the applicant, Amit Kumar, and lives with him and their child, alleging that the FIR was filed by her step‑father to harass the family. The applicant, charged under sections 87, 65(1), 115(2), 352 of the B.N.S., sections 5J(2)/6 of the POCSO Act …
The applicant, Jameel Khan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 07.05.2024 and the related criminal complaint (Case No. 1108 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 406, 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The matter was referred …
Natthulal filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order that awarded Rs. 5000 as maintenance to his daughter, alleging the amount was excessive and beyond his financial means despite owning seven acres of land. The opposite party argued that the sum was modest and the petitioner could …
The revisionist Abhay Patel challenged a Family Court order that awarded Rs.3,000 to his wife and Rs.1,500 to his daughter as maintenance, arguing the total of Rs.4,500 was excessive and beyond his financial means. The State, represented by the learned A.G.A., contended that the revisionist earns …
The revisionist, a labourer, challenged the Family Court’s order directing him to pay Rs 4,000 per month to his wife and Rs 1,000 to a third party under Section 125 Cr.P.C., claiming the amount was excessive given his modest earnings. The State opposed, arguing the award was reasonable in light of …
The revisionist, an unemployed woman with a B.Pharm diploma, challenged the Family Court's order rejecting her claim for maintenance, arguing that the interest earned on a Rs. 14 lakh fixed deposit gifted by her father (or husband) does not constitute income. The Additional Principal Judge had held …
The applicant, Sarvesh Kumar, was charged with murder under Sections 103(1), 351(3), 61(2)(a) of the BNS and Sections 3, 25, 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly shooting the informant's son on 7 July 2024. The prosecution alleged that the applicant was the sole assailant, citing the FIR and statements …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kamata Prasad Tiwari, accused under Sections 103(1) and 352 of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 30 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, citing that the star witness, the informant‑victim, had turned hostile and withdrawn her earlier …
The revisionist Naresh Verma challenged a Family Court order directing him to pay Rs 10,000 per month as maintenance to his wife under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He claimed his income was only Rs 10,000 per month from work in a jewellery shop that he does not own, arguing the amount …
The applicant, husband of a deceased woman, sought bail in a criminal case alleging smothering, invoking Sections 85, 80(2), 103(1), 61(2) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. He claimed the death was accidental, stating his wife’s dupatta got caught in his motorcycle wheel, and that he …
The applicant, Dhakan Lal, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 506 of 2023) involving IPC sections 302, 504 and 34. He claimed innocence and argued that he had already been in custody for over two years, assuring the court he would not misuse liberty. The State opposed bail, noting that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nazr Ali @ Husaini, who was charged under Sections 140(2), 103(1) and 238(a) of the BNS in a case involving the recovery of a dead body. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that he was falsely implicated, that the recovery was a sham, and …
The revisionist Gaurav challenged a Family Court order that awarded Rs 3,000 per month as maintenance to his wife and son, arguing the amount was excessive given his unemployment and pending criminal cases. The State contended that the award was proportionate to the revisionist's income potential. …
The petition challenged a Family Court order dated 04‑07‑2024 that required the mother to bring her minor child to the District Legal Service Authority on specified Saturdays for visitation with the father. The petitioner argued that a recall application filed against the original visitation order …
The petitioner, Shrawan Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a minimum pay scale of Rs. 18,000 with arrears. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the minimum pay scale had already been granted, rendering the petition infructuous, and requested its withdrawal. The court dismissed the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Manish, accused in Crime No. 62 of 2025 under Section 103(1) BNS for a death that occurred at his residence. The applicant's counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, that the deceased had an illicit relationship with the applicant's sister, …
Irfan and three others filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petition was listed before the Allahabad High Court, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. Counsel for the …
Petitioner Rajendra Kumar Sharma filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Ghaziabad to dispose of a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act within six months. The High Court examined whether it could impose such a …
The applicant, Dharmendra Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving a 16‑year‑old victim, as established by an ossification report. The applicant's counsel argued that the victim's statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S. showed no offence under Section 64, contending that the …
The applicant, Sameer Usmani, was charged under Sections 85, 80(2) of the CrPC, Section 3/4 of the D.P. Act and Section 302 IPC for allegedly murdering his wife after demanding a Mercedes car. The applicant contended that the death was accidental, citing the post‑mortem, vehicle examination, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered bail application No. 35381 of 2025 filed by Krishna alias Pradumm, who is accused in Crime No. 324 of 2025 under sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S. and sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, relying on …
The applicant, Sugreev Kumar, was arrested in connection with Crime No.168 of 2025 under Sections 103 and 238A of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to have been implicated by an informant present at a cremation. The applicant contended that he is innocent, the FIR lacks specific date and time details, …
The applicant Rohit Upadhyay filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal trial (Case No. 68572 of 2024) arising from an FIR alleging repeated rape, blackmail with indecent videos, and exploitation under the guise of exorcism. The victim, a married woman, reported …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Saeen, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 246 of 2025 under Section 105 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed she was falsely implicated and that the FIR was lodged four days after the alleged incident, which she argued weakened the …
Smt Aarti applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 83 of 2025) alleging she was falsely implicated in the death of a person who allegedly died by electrocution. The applicant argued that the FIR was filed twelve days after the incident, no post‑mortem was conducted, and the only incriminating …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash a supplementary chargesheet dated 05‑11‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 12‑08‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 5201 of 2023. The charges were originally framed against co‑accused after an FIR, but the Superintendent of Police …
Vishwas applied for bail in a murder case (Crime No.84 of 2025) where the prosecution alleges that he, along with co‑accused Ramkesh Kushwaha and Gulbasar, abducted the informant's father, consumed alcohol and then slaughtered him on 22 June 2025. The applicant pleaded innocence, highlighting a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anil, who was arrested in Crime No. 104 of 2025 under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated and that the only eyewitness evidence pertained to a co-accused, Sangeeta, with no …
The complainant filed a criminal complaint in 2011; the accused were acquitted by the trial court on 26‑06‑2023. The complainant erroneously appealed to the Session Court, which dismissed the appeal on 11‑07‑2024, directing that any appeal must be filed in the High Court under Section 378(4) of the …
The applicant, Avanish (also known as Anish), was arrested in connection with the death of his wife, who allegedly committed suicide by ingesting aluminum phosphide within three months of marriage. The prosecution alleged dowry‑related harassment and possible murder, but the deceased’s mother, who …
The revisionist, a retired Indian Army pensioner earning Rs 31,000 per month, challenged the Family Court's order directing him to pay Rs 4,000‑5,000 monthly maintenance to his wife under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, claiming the amount was excessive and that she had withdrawn Rs 6 …
Riyazuddin was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No.31 of 2025) after a FIR was lodged fifteen hours after the incident. The FIR initially named three accused and later, on the same day, the informant implicated Riyazuddin as the perpetrator. The applicant contended that there was no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul Kumar, who was accused in Crime No. 303 of 2025 for alleged rape under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the Evidence Act and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed the alleged victim, aged between 13 and 16 according to …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sheeshkali, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, in a dowry‑related case under Sections 85, 80(2), 352 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that she was falsely implicated, had no …
The petitioner, Najeer Hussain, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs.18,000 with arrears, and his counsel moved to withdraw the writ petition on that basis. The High Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The Court further directed that the benefits …
The appellant, Anas, was charged under several provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for an alleged assault on a group of persons on 22 August 2025, during which caste‑related abuse was also alleged. The Special Judge had …
The appellants Saalim, Ikramu and Farooq appealed against the Special Judge’s order rejecting their bail application under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that on 22‑08‑2025 the accused assaulted several persons with …
The revisionist, Devpratap @ Raju, filed a criminal revision against the Family Court's order dated 18 September 2024 which awarded a monthly maintenance of Rs.4,000 to the opposite party No.2 under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The revisionist agreed to continue paying the monthly …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash an order dated 17 May 2025 in which the District Collector entertained an application by a private tenure holder concerning possession of land that was already the subject of a civil suit. The petitioners argued that the …
The appellant Imtiyaz Ali was convicted in a Special Trial for alleged assault and murder of the informant's father, alleged to have involved punches, kicks, bricks, sticks and a knife, under multiple IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He filed a bail application which was …
The applicant Rampal sought bail in a murder case (Crime No. 241 of 2025) alleging he killed the informant's mother on 16 May 2025. The prosecution argued that the FIR was filed 18 hours after the incident, a recovered weapon was linked to the applicant, and call data records placed him near the …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Ravi Kumar, who has been in custody for over one and a half years for an offence under Section 105 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that no prosecution witness had been examined and that he was not causing any delay in the …
The High Court considered a criminal revision filed by Akash Verma seeking to quash an order that summoned him as an accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. (formerly Section 358(2) BNSS) in a POCSO‑related case. The victim’s FIR named only Uday Verma, but her later statement under Section 164 identified …
Rev. Fr. Vineet Vincent Pereira filed an application under Section 528 seeking quash of the chargesheet and cognizance order in a criminal case filed under Section 295A IPC for allegedly insulting Hindu religious sentiments during a prayer meeting. The applicant contended that the investigation …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu Sahu, who had been in custody since 30‑10‑2025 in connection with a case involving alleged offences under Sections 87, 137(2), 65(1) of the B.N.S., and Sections 5L/6 of the POSCO Act. An ossification test revealed that the alleged victim was …
Ishan Sahu filed a criminal revision under Sections 397/401 CrPC challenging an interim maintenance order of Rs 12,000 per month (Rs 8,000 to his wife and Rs 4,000 to his son) passed by the Family Court under Section 125 CrPC. The petitioner argued that he runs only a small temporary bicycle repair …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitesh in Criminal Case No. 95 of 2025, which involved alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 65(1), 87 of the B.N.S. and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the victim, a 17‑year‑old schoolgirl, had …
The revisionist, Abhishek Chaudhary, was charged under Sections 376 and 506 IPC for alleged rape and criminal intimidation stemming from a promise of marriage that later broke down. He moved a discharge application under Section 227 CrPC, which the Additional Sessions Judge rejected. On revision, …
Sujeet Yadav was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged sexual offences against a 13‑year‑8‑month‑old girl, charged under several IPC sections, the POCSO Act, the Information Technology Act and the SC/ST Act. The victim’s statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS did …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajan, accused in Criminal Case No. 414 of 2025 for offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1), 123 BNS of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, a 17‑year‑old girl, gave contradictory statements: initially she identified the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Karan Kumar, accused in Crime No. 928 of 2025 under IPC sections 65(1), 351(3), 61(2), 115(2) and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a 13‑year‑old girl. The victim’s first statement under Section 180 of the Evidence Act did not …
The appellant, Ravindra Kumar Awasthi, filed a special appeal challenging a decision of the lower court. The High Court noted that an earlier case with identical facts, Ravindra Kumar Awasthi vs. State of U.P. and 5 others (2026), had been allowed. Relying on that precedent, the Court found no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Firoz Ansari, accused of rape under Sections 64(1), 127(2) of the IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, and Sections 180 and 183 of the CrPC. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the victim’s statements were contradictory and that she …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raghuveer Nishad, who had been in custody since 18 September 2025 in connection with a case involving a 17‑year‑old victim. An ossification test confirmed the victim’s age as 17, but the applicant’s counsel argued that the victim was a major and …
The applicant, Prabhakar Rai, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a stay of an execution order dated 30‑10‑2025 issued by the Family Court, Azamgarh, for recovery of outstanding maintenance of Rs. 3,16,000. The parties had earlier been directed to mediation, resulting in a …
Anita Chauhan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.310 of 2025) alleging false implication and lack of substantive evidence, including no weapon assignment. The FIR and statements only contain general allegations of beating the first informant. The applicant, a first‑time female offender, …
Shrimati Devi was arrested in connection with Crime No.310 of 2025, alleged under IPC sections 3(5), 109, 110, 115(2), 131, 333 and 352. She filed a bail application claiming she was falsely implicated, that the FIR and statements contain only vague allegations, no weapon was assigned to her, and …
Shahbaj alias Shabbu applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 108 of 2025) where he is charged under IPC sections 137(2), 351(3), 64, the POCSO Act (sections 3 and 4) and the SC/ST Act (section 3(2)(V)). The prosecution’s victim, about 17 years old, allegedly gave consent in statements …
The petition filed by M/s Aarti Industries through its proprietor against Central Bank of India, Khurja Branch was consigned to the records. The Court directed that the order in Writ‑C No. 42640 of 2024 in the case of M/s Pooja Industries v. Central Bank of India, Khurja Branch be referred to for …
The petition filed by M/s Pooja Industries under writ jurisdiction sought relief against Central Bank of India, Khurja Branch. The respondent contended that the petitioner and the bank had reached a settlement under the One Time Settlement (OTS) scheme, with a settlement amount of Rs.13,90,000. The …
The High Court of Allahabad heard bail application No. 43256 of 2025 filed by Rizwan Ansari, who was arrested in connection with FIR No. 155/2025 under provisions of the Indian Constitution (Articles 64(1), 351(3), 3/4(2)) and alleged offences. The applicant contended that the case was false, that …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No.16, Azamgarh to decide a stay application filed on 31 July 2025 concerning a land dispute. The petitioner argued that the stay application remained pending despite multiple dates …
Arif appealed to the Allahabad High Court against the order of the Special Judge that rejected his bail application in a case under the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellant claimed he was falsely implicated, that the victim's statement contained …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Shadab Ahmad @ Saddam in a case under IPC Sections 103(1) and 352, alleging assault on the informant's father. The applicant claimed innocence, citing a delayed FIR, lack of eyewitnesses, and CCTV footage that showed he was present …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sachin, accused under Sections 87, 137(2), 64(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence involving a minor. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the victim was 16 years old and that the incident …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 09.05.2024 and the entire proceedings of a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The applicant argued that the complaint was premature because it was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Lal Krishna, who was arrested in Crime No. 427 of 2025 on charges under several IPC sections (333, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 78, 70(2) BNS) and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the victim’s statements only …
The applicant, Suaib Khan, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking to set aside an order dated 16‑10‑2025 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)‑3, Kanpur Nagar in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rambali Pal alias Raju Pal, who is accused of sexual exploitation of a married woman and alleged sexual assault on her nine‑year‑old daughter under various provisions of the IPC, SC/ST Act and POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Saurabh Dubey, husband of a deceased woman, who was charged under Sections 85, 352, 108, 351(3) of the B.N.S., Section 67 of the Information Technology Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged abetment of suicide. The …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Prakash Anand Rao, who was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No.523 of 2023) involving offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 354ख, 376 and POCSO Act sections 7 and 8. Rao claimed he was falsely implicated due to a civil …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.17617 of 2022) arising from offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 324, 504 and 506. The parties had amicably settled their dispute and filed a compromise application …
Petitioners Smt. Swati Chadha and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Real Estate Regularity Bench No.3, Gautam Buddha Nagar, to decide their applications dated 09.12.2025 and 10.12.2025 and to fix an earlier hearing date instead of 27.02.2026. The respondents argued that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Haseen, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 74, 64(1), 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, pointing out that the FIR was lodged four days after the alleged …
The applicant, Mohd. Moinuddin Ajmeri, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of the charge‑sheet dated 16‑12‑2018, the cognizance and summoning order dated 06‑08‑2021 and a bailable warrant dated 20‑02‑2025 in Criminal Case No.121 of 2021, which arose …
Malkeet Sharma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench. No representative appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the learned Additional Government …
The applicant, Ram Autar, filed a civil contempt application (No. 1072 of 2014) before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed before Hon'ble Justice Manish Kumar. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant and no request for adjournment was made. The court noted the absence of …
Jamuna Prasad Tiwari filed a civil contempt application (No. 1782 of 2023) against Jasjeet Kaur, the District Magistrate of Sultanpur. The applicant's counsel, comprising Shikha Srivastava, Richa Srivastava and Suneel Kumar Singh Kalhans, were listed but neither the applicant nor any counsel …
The applicant, Major Sheshmani Nath Tripathi, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the …
Shitla Prasad Shukla filed a civil contempt application against Shivashish Shukla and others. The applicant's counsel did not appear before the court and no request for adjournment was made on his behalf. The court noted the absence of representation and the lack of any request to postpone the …
Juvenile X, through his natural guardian, filed a criminal revision (No. 1318 of 2024) against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, but no party appeared when the case was taken up. The learned Additional Government Advocate represented …
The appellant Devi Prasad filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency, an office report dated 16 March 2026 confirmed that Devi Prasad had died. No relative filed an application to continue the appeal on his behalf. The court noted that a related appeal (Appellant …
The appeal challenged the conviction of Rajendra alias Tuttal under Sections 326/34 and 323/34 of the IPC for a 1982 assault in which a co‑accused fired a weapon and the appellant allegedly struck the victim with a lathi. The trial court had sentenced him to five years for the grievous‑hurt charge …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the summons dated 13.01.2021 and stay the criminal proceedings (sections 354A, 323 and 406 IPC) in Complaint No. 3813 of 2020 (Sweta Singh v. Abhishek Singh). The parties had amicably settled the dispute and filed a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a notice‑cum‑order dated 19‑12‑2025 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Sikandrarao, Hathras, which was passed on a printed proforma under Section 107/16 of the BNSS/Cr.P.C. The …
The petitioners, Rakesh Singh and four others, challenged an FIR dated 02‑02‑2026 filed by Vimal Kumar Singh under sections 191(2), 351(2), 352 and 324(4) of the IPC, alleging that the criminal case arose out of a civil land‑dispute involving consolidation proceedings under the U.P. Consolidation of …
The petitioner failed to appear before the High Court for the hearing of the writ petition and the impleadment applications. Earlier, a Division Bench had remitted the matter to be decided afresh after ordering the impleadment of respondents 4 to 8. The petitioner filed impleadment applications but …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash proceedings initiated under Section 145 Cr.P.C. based on a challan report concerning a land dispute. The applicant argued that the matter was purely civil, with a pending civil suit for injunction, …
The bail application No. 16641 of 2025 filed by Sahil Kumar against the State of U.P. and others was listed before Hon’ble Justice Krishan Pahal on 27 May 2026. No factual background, legal issues, reasoning or decision are recorded in the excerpt. The counsel for the applicant were Karunesh Pratap …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a Judicial Magistrate’s order dated 15‑01‑2025 that proceeded against them under Sections 323 and 504 IPC. The charge‑sheet arose from a non‑cognizable report lodged on 07‑08‑2019, after which the magistrate directed …
The revisionist Rajeev Pandey filed a criminal revision challenging the Sessions Judge’s order dated 2 April 2025 that discharged Harish Chandra Tiwari and Sangeeta Tiwari in a case of alleged assault causing serious neck injury to his uncle, Kade Prasad Tiwari, on 6 August 2022. The FIR, lodged on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a charge‑sheet and summons in a criminal case involving alleged trespass, damage to property, theft, intimidation and outraging the modesty of a woman. The FIR alleged that the …
The petitioners, Indrajeet Singh and others, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking relief from the State of U.P. and others. The petitioner’s counsel requested additional time to file a copy of a compromise deed that was recorded by a Civil Court in 2004. The court considered the request and, …
The petition under Article 227 (No. 10268 of 2025) was listed as fresh on 4 May 2026. Respondent No.2 to 4, represented by Advocate Devendra Kumar Pandey, sought a adjournment to prepare their case. No substantive merits were addressed in the order. The matter was noted by the court and the order …
The applicant, Dr. Amit Kumar Pandey, filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed before Hon'ble Justice Manish Kumar. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant and no request for adjournment was made. The court noted the absence of representation and the …
The appellant Sri Ram Pandey was convicted under IPC sections 323 and 34 and sentenced to a fine of Rs 500 with six months’ rigorous imprisonment in default. The High Court noted that the trial court failed to consider the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and Sections 360 and 361 of the CrPC, which …
The High Court examined a criminal appeal filed by Guddu Agnihotri and Abdulla against the State of U.P. After a report and death certificate confirmed that Guddu Agnihotri had died on 6 November 2002, the court also noted that Abdulla, the second appellant, was already dead, leading to a petition …
The appellants Raghubir Singh and Surendra were convicted under IPC sections 323, 325 and 452 and sentenced to fines and two years of rigorous imprisonment. They appealed the conviction, arguing that the trial and appellate courts failed to consider the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and the …
Ashok Kumar Maurya and six others filed a civil contempt application (No. 1254 of 2020) against Tej Pratap Singh Yadav, Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, alleging non‑compliance with an earlier order of the Writ Court. The applicants' counsel was absent while the respondent's counsel appeared …
Petitioner Smt. Sushila Pandey filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Officer (Judicial), Handia Tehsil, to dispose of a restoration application (T202502030410488) that had been pending for over five years. The petitioner argued that despite the lapse of considerable …
Salman, the accused, applied for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case (Crime No. 301 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 109, 317(2), 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3, 25, 27 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed …
The appellant, a complainant, challenged the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge who, while convicting the accused under Section 323 IPC, granted them probation for one year under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act and acquitted them of the charge under Section 504 IPC. The appellant …
The applicants, Mulayam Singh and Mainudeen @ Irshad Ali, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a case registered under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act concerning alleged illegal possession of urea. They argued that they had cooperated with the …
The petitioner, Mohmood Fatima, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Tehsil Chayal, District Kaushambi, to decide a restoration application dated 21-12-2017 (case No. 205263 of 2017, Pradeep Kumar vs. Asharif Lal) within a fixed period. The petitioner argued that an …
The revisionist, owner of vehicle HR-45C-00547, challenged the magistrate's order refusing release of his seized vehicle, which was taken under the Prevention of Animal Cruelty Act and the U.P. Cow Slaughter Act on allegations of transporting cows. The magistrate dismissed the revisionist's …
The revisionist, Ravendra Singh, filed a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court and simultaneously sought condonation of a 1,941‑day delay in filing that revision. He claimed that he only learned of the underlying criminal case and the recovery order against him after returning to his …
The revisionist, Smt. Priti Saxena, sought discharge under Section 245(2) of the Cr.P.C. in a criminal case under Section 494 IPC alleging bigamy. She claimed her prior divorce was finalized on 28‑08‑2015 and that she had informed her new husband, but she failed to produce any divorce decree. The …
Seema Gupta filed a criminal revision under Section 173(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Azamgarh, which rejected her application to add further accused in a family property dispute that resulted in injuries. The incident on 22‑02‑2025 led to …
Kapil Kumar challenged the charge sheet filed under IPC sections 323, 342, 504 and 506, alleging that the FIR dated 01.01.2022 was false and fabricated due to family enmity. He produced an alibi showing he was on the AMU campus on the alleged date and was appearing for an engineering exam on a later …
Shesh Mani Maurya filed a criminal revision challenging an order dated 28-10-2021 passed by the Principal Judge Family Court, Mirzapur. Along with the revision, he sought condonation of a 922‑day delay in filing the revision, claiming he attempted settlement through mediation which failed. The State …
Rameshchandra filed a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court challenging orders dated 5 September 2023 and 5 August 2024 passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Jaunpur. He also sought exemption to file a certified copy of those orders. The court observed that the …
The police seized a pickup vehicle owned by Jitendra Bind, finding six bulls, one cow, a pistol and a cartridge, and the District Magistrate ordered the vehicle's confiscation under the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 and the Arms Act. The revisionist contended that the …
The petitioners, Atlantis College of Education and another, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a trust deed registration and mandamus directing various respondents to consider their objections and allow participation in a society election. The petitioners' counsel also made an innocuous …
The revisionist, Chhote Lal Maurya, filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 12‑08‑2025 of the Additional District and Sessions Judge which rejected his application for a CBI investigation into the murder of his son. The original investigation had exonerated three accused (Vinod Singh, …
Manoj Kumar, accused in a multi‑charge case (including murder under IPC s.304) arising from an incident on 21‑June‑2024, applied for enlargement of bail. He claimed false implication, delay in filing the FIR, and pointed to bail granted to co‑accused. The State argued that the applicant inflicted a …
Ram Nazar Dubey filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court, seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. The applicant was represented by Senior Advocate Indra Jit Singh, while the opposite side was represented by G.A. The …
Nazim filed a criminal revision and a separate application seeking condonation of a 924‑day delay, alleging that he had not been served any summons or notice in the recovery proceedings under Section 125(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court examined the affidavit and found that Nazim had …
Manoj Kumar, accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 331 of 2024) under Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code, has been in custody since July 5, 2024. He filed a bail application seeking enlargement of bail during the trial. The High Court noted that the facts and incident are identical to those in a …
The applicant, Shyam Sunder, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to set aside the Family Court’s order dated 23 September 2024 that dismissed his request to pay arrears of maintenance in monthly installments of Rs 30,000. The maintenance orders under Section 125 CrPC required him …
The applicant, Diksha Singh, filed a transfer application seeking to move the suit to another court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that, due to subsequent developments, the applicant no longer wished to pursue the transfer. A separate withdrawal application (Civil …
Kalawati filed a first appeal against Order No. 862 of 2013. The appellant's counsel had not taken steps to summon the case records as required. The court, noting the office report dated 17.10.2022, observed this non‑compliance. It granted the appellant one week to procure the records. The order …
The appellant, U.P.S.R.T.C. Faizabad, filed a first appeal against Order No. 421 of 2008. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No counsel for the appellant appeared, and no request for adjournment was made. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal in default. The …
Magma Hdi General Insurance Co Ltd filed a first appeal before the Allahabad High Court against Order No. 335 of 2018. The appellant’s counsel, Indrajeet and Amit Kumar Srivastava, were listed but no representative appeared in court on the scheduled date. No request for adjournment or any other …
Petitioner Kaushal Prasad Tiwari filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. His counsel sought additional time to prepare the case, but the matter was listed peremptorily and could not be adjourned. The court held that, in the absence of any instruction to the contrary, the petition …
Petitioner Chandralekha Singh filed a petition under Article 227 challenging a Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) order dated 02‑09‑2024, alleging that the order was passed without any hearing and was prima facie suspicious. The respondent, Canara Bank Regional Office, contended that an appeal against the …
The applicants, Syed Mohd. Afzal and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 24‑05‑2022 in a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 465 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They …
The petitioner, Haushila Prasad Yadav, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs 18,000 with arrears, rendering the writ petition unnecessary. Accordingly, his counsel sought to withdraw the petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and ordered that the benefits already …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash criminal case No. 968 of 2020, which stemmed from a land dispute involving alleged forgery of sale deeds. The prosecution alleged that the applicants conspired to forge documents to transfer land to a trust, invoking several …
The petitioner, Bhagwan Deen, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs. 18,000 with arrears, rendering the pending writ petition unnecessary. His counsel moved to withdraw the petition, and the court dismissed it as withdrawn. The court directed that the benefits already awarded to the …
The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for offences under Sections 323/34, 325/34, 452, 504, 506 and 307/34 of the IPC arising from an assault on a retired army officer's family. The appellant challenged only the sentence, seeking relief under Section 4 of the Probation of …
Petitioner Gajey Singh filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 23848 of 2014) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and no adjournment was sought. The Court observed that the cause of action had become stale due to the petitioner’s failure to press the petition. …
The petitioner, Balram Shukla, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the District Magistrate to remove occupants who had allegedly encroached on land acquired for the construction of court buildings. The petition identified several individuals as occupants but did not implead …
The appellant Suresh, convicted under Sections 363 and 366 of the IPC and sentenced to seven years' imprisonment with fine, applied to the Allahabad High Court for suspension of his sentence pending appeal. The appeal was filed against the conviction dated 12-12-2006 by the Additional Sessions …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 on behalf of Sagar Chauhan, who was charged with multiple offences under the BNS and the Information Technology Act for allegedly facilitating the fraudulent transfer of Rs. 74,90,866 into accounts he signed as …
Tarawati, the informant, filed an FIR and a charge‑sheet against five accused under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 and 120B. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) in Agra took cognizance only of sections 467, 468, 471 and 506, omitting 420 and 120B, and the applicant sought to quash …
The petitioner, Kartar Singh @ Kaushal Bharti, filed a writ petition seeking direction for the speedy disposal of a restoration application pending before the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Etmadpur, under Section 209(h) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The restoration application, filed on 13 March …
Mamta Pandey filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 5681 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petitioner, through counsel Kushmondeya Shahi, later informed the court that the petition was to be withdrawn. The court …
The revision petition filed by Shambhu Paswan and others challenged a Sessions Judge's order rejecting their application under Section 251 of the BNSS. The petitioners argued that there was no injury sufficient to constitute an offence under Section 307 IPC and that the order was arbitrary. The …
The revisionist challenged the order of the Additional Sessions Judge in a POCSO‑related case, alleging that the medical evidence of the victim Gyanendra was incomplete because X‑ray and CT‑scan reports were not on record, and that the investigating officer’s credibility was compromised. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 11‑01‑2026, the cognizance order dated 07‑02‑2026, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 400 of 2026 arising from Crime No. 566 of 2025. The FIR alleged offences under …
Vishnu Dwivedi filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court, seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The applicant was represented by counsel Jitendra Prasad Mishra and Prateek Srivastava, while the State was …
The appellant filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, but was absent on two occasions when the case was called, leading the trial court to dismiss the complaint under Section 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The appellant argued that his regular prior appearances …
The appellant, Kailash Chandra, filed a second appeal (No. 991 of 2022) before the Allahabad High Court against the order of Gram Panchayat Zafar Hussainpur and another. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant to prosecute the appeal. The Court observed the absence of any prosecution and, …
The appellant, Rajeshwar Mahato, was convicted under Sections 8Ga and 20(Kha) (Sa) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act and sentenced to ten years' imprisonment, a fine of Rs.1.25 lakh and an additional one‑year rigorous imprisonment for defaulting on the fine. He appealed the …
The applicants sought to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case alleging forgery of a will concerning property of the deceased Kishori Lal. The dispute centres on two wills – one dated 17‑03‑2023 (registered in favour of the complainant) and another dated 22‑07‑2023 …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the lower court to decide suit No. 195 of 2016 (Alamgeer v. Irshad Ansari & others), which had been pending since 2016 despite several dates being fixed. The petitioners argued that the prolonged delay …
The revisionist, Raj Kumar Maurya, appealed against a Family Court order under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code that required him to pay Rs 25,000 per month as maintenance for his minor son. He argued that his wife, who also earns a substantial salary, should share the maintenance burden …
The applicant, Harish Chandra Gautam, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party, were impleaded. Counsel for the applicant was Sudhakar Singh, while the State was represented …
The applicant, Akhilesh Gupta, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash proceedings. The application was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, but the applicant failed to appear. The court observed that, due to the passage of time, the …
Anoop Srivastava filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023) seeking the High Court's intervention in the criminal proceedings. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while the learned Additional …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 by Neeraj Mandiya, who was charged with offences under Sections 316(4), 118(4), 336(3), 340(2), 338 of the BNS and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act for alleged participation in a large financial …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court's intervention. On the scheduled date, no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants, while counsel for the opposite party was present. The court noted the absence of the applicants' …
A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 39296 of 2017) was filed by Shri Ram Singh and three others against the State of U.P. and four others. The petitioners' counsel, Anil Kumar Singh, appeared before the court and informed that he had no instructions to represent the petitioners. The respondents' counsel, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order dated 07.04.2023 and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 2564 of 2023, Sheshdhar Dubey v. Raivshankar) pending before the Judicial Magistrate‑II, Bhadohi, which were based …
The petitioners, Muskan Singh and another, married on 16-02-2026 and alleged harassment by the State of Uttar Pradesh authorities for exercising their right to marry. They sought a writ of mandamus to prevent any interference in their marital life and requested police protection. Relying on Supreme …
A revision was filed by Punjab National Bank against a decree ordering it to vacate a premises and pay arrears of rent. The bank had vacated the premises on 14 July 2025 and deposited the due rent, but retained the keys, citing a dispute between the landlord and the society. The court observed that …
The appellants Santosh Kumar Shukla and others filed Special Appeal Defective No. 272 of 2013 against the Union of India and others. Counsel for the appellants, Alok Mishra, submitted that the appeal had become infructuous. The respondents were represented by A.S.G.I., Ritvik Upadhya, Rizwan Ali …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner's counsel, Anil Kumar Singh, informed the court that he had no instructions to represent the petitioners. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Saleem, who is accused in Crime No. 333 of 2024 under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. Saleem claimed innocence and …
The appellants challenged the registration of office-bearer lists of a society for the years 2024-25 and 2025-26, alleging that no elections had been held since 2005 and that the inductions were illegal. The Single Judge dismissed their writ petition, stating that the factual issues regarding …
The Committee of Management of Madhuban Shiksha Samiti appealed to the Allahabad High Court against a Single Judge’s order that dismissed their writ petition and sent the matter to the Registrar. The appellants argued that the Committee, though the real party, was not impleaded, rendering the writ …
The petitioners, Committee of Management of Hindustan Aeronautics Karamchari Sehkari Awas Samiti Ltd and another, sought a mandamus directing the respondents to enforce an interim order dated 8 May 2025 issued by an arbitral tribunal, despite a later order of this Court on 30 May 2025 staying the …
The appellants were charged with house‑trespass, assault with deadly weapons and attempted murder (IPC §§452, 307 r/w 34) arising from a night‑time incident in Etah district. The trial court, finding that the medical evidence did not show fatal or life‑threatening injuries, convicted them only under …
The revisionists, Harishchandra and three others, filed a criminal revision under Section 227 of the CrPC challenging the discharge order dated 20‑11‑2024 in a session trial concerning offences under Sections 323 and 308 of the IPC. They contended that the alleged incident occurred on 01‑11‑2022 and …
The High Court considered bail applications filed by Boby and Rahul, who were charged under sections 137(2), 64(2)(ड), 87 of the B.N.S. and sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing two minors, aged 17 and 15, to elope and engage in sexual relations. The defence argued that the older …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal complaint (Case No. 1391 of 2024) filed against them under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 325 of the IPC. The High Court examined the material and observed that the existence of an offence could not be …
The revisionist, Akhilesh Kumar, filed a criminal revision under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. seeking a direction to register an FIR and investigate offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC relating to a land dispute. The High Court examined whether the revisionist was an aggrieved …
The petitioners, Aniruddh Jain and two others, filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Puneet Arun, informed the court that they did not wish to pursue the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The connected matter was …
The revisionists, Banti alias Mritunjay and three others, were charge‑sheeted under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 110 of the B.N.S. for injuries inflicted on several victims, including head wounds. They filed a discharge application which the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) rejected, …
The Allahabad High Court dismissed a criminal revision filed by Raman and four others challenging a summoning order under Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The revisionists argued that they were initially named in the FIR but later found to be falsely implicated, and no charge sheet was …
