Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MOHAMMAD SALMAN SIDDIQUI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners, Mohammad Salman Siddiqui and four others, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. The petition sought relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the petition. The court accepted this statement and ordered the petition to be dismissed as withdrawn. The court also directed that the certified copies of the relevant documents be returned to the petitioners' counsel, while retaining a photostat copy on record.

Subjects

  • Article 227
  • withdrawn petition
  • High Court of Allahabad

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                             MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12491 of 2025

                                    Mohammad Salman Siddiqui And 4 Others
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                     :    Shams Uz Zaman
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                     :    G.A.

                                    Court No. - 89
                                                         HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri R.K.Singh, learned
                                    A.G.A. for the State are present.

                                    2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he does not wish to press
                                    this petition and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.

                                    3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

                                    4. Certified copy of the relevant documents be returned to the learned
                                    counsel for the petitioner, after retaining photostat copy of the same on
                                    record.
                                    April 23, 2026
                                    Ujjawal
                                                                                            (Anil Kumar-X,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
UJJAWAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.