Allahabad High Court
YELLOWBIRD HOTELS AND RESORTS PVT. LTD.versusBABU LAL PRAJAPATI AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Holding
The petition is disposed because all remaining properties are under the jurisdiction of another district court, leaving nothing before the Gautam Buddha Nagar court.
Summary
Yellowbird Hotels And Resorts Pvt. Ltd. filed a petition under Article 227 seeking direction regarding the remaining properties of a judgment debtor. The petitioner alleged that the properties were within the jurisdiction of the District Judge, Gautam Buddha Nagar. The respondent submitted an affidavit indicating that all such properties are actually situated within the jurisdiction of the District Judge (South‑East), Saket Court, New Delhi, and that the matter had been referred there on 20‑April‑2026. The petitioner did not contest this submission. Consequently, the High Court held that no property remained before the Gautam Buddha Nagar court and disposed of the petition at this stage.
Issues considered
- Whether the High Court should entertain the petition under Article 227 when all remaining properties of the judgment debtor lie within the jurisdiction of another district court
Subjects
- jurisdiction
- Article 227
- property
- judgment debtor
- court disposal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 16222 of 2025
Yellowbird Hotels And Resorts Pvt. Ltd.
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Babu Lal Prajapati And Another
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shreyas Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashish Mishra, Sudhir Mehrotra
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J.
In pursuance of earlier order, personal affidavit of Mr.Atul Srivastava,
learned District Judge, Gautam Buddha Nagar has been filed, which is
taken on record.
On the strength of said affidavit, Mr. Sudhir Mehrotra, learned counsel for
the respondent submits that all remaining properties of the judgement
debtor are situated within the jurisdiction of District Judge (South -East),
Saket Court, New Delhi and the matter has been referred there vide order
dated 20.4.2026, therefore, at present nothing remained before the District
Court, Gautam Buddha Nagar.
Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the said fact.
In view of above, the petition is disposed of at this stage.
(Piyush Agrawal,J.)
May 7, 2026
Rahul Dwivedi/-
Digitally signed by :-
RAHUL DWIVEDI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…