Allahabad High Court
HARISH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
A petition under Article 227 (No. 8835 of 2025) was filed by Harish Kumar against the State of U.P. and another respondent. The petitioner was represented by counsel Prakash Veer Tripathi. During the hearing, the petitioner expressed that he no longer wished to pursue the petition. The counsel accordingly requested that the petition be treated as withdrawn. The High Court, after noting the request, dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The court ordered the return of the original documents to the petitioner’s counsel while retaining a photocopy on record.
Issues considered
- Whether the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner’s request
Subjects
- Article 227
- withdrawal of petition
- high court procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8835 of 2025
Harish Kumar
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prakash Veer Tripathi
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 89
HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J.
1. Sri Ashutosh Pandey, holding brief of Sri Prakash Veer Tripathi, learned
counsel for the petitioner and Sri Acharya Rajesh Tripathi, learned A.G.A.
for the State are present.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press
this petition and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Certified copy of the relevant documents be returned to the learned
counsel for the petitioner, after retaining photostat copy of the same on
record.
May 5, 2026
Ujjawal
(Anil Kumar-X,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
UJJAWAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…