Allahabad High Court
PRASHANT YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
Holding
The court held that a petition may be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to raise grounds at the time of framing of charge.
Summary
Petitioner Prashant Yadav filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of U.P. and another respondent. The matter was listed before Justice Anil Kumar‑X and was heard by counsel for both parties. The petitioner, through his advocates, prayed that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn and sought liberty to raise all grounds at the stage of framing of charge. The court entertained the request and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. Consequently, no merits were decided and the petitioner was permitted to raise any grounds later at the charge‑framing stage.
Subjects
- Article 227
- petition withdrawal
- high court procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8907 of 2025
Prashant Yadav
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Himanshu Bansal, Shivam Yadav
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Devesh Kumar Shukla, G.A.
Court No. - 89
HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for private
respondent and Sri Amrit Raj Chaurasiya, learned AGA for State -
respondent.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the present petition be
dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise all the grounds at the stage of
framing of charge.
3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty
to raise all such grounds at the time of framing of charge.
May 14, 2026
Mukesh
(Anil Kumar-X,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
MUKESH SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…