Allahabad High Court
T.T. LTD. THROUGH OCCUPIER and ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. and ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed on merits/Rejected
- Bench
- BRIJ RAJ SINGH
Holding
The application under Section 482 was dismissed because of non‑appearance of the applicant and the efflux of time.
Summary
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow Bench) heard an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by T.T. Ltd. Through Occupier and others against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. No representative of the applicant appeared to press the application, nor was any request for adjournment made. The learned Additional Government Advocate and counsel for the private respondent were present. The Court observed that the application had lost its efficacy due to the efflux of time and consequently dismissed it. The interim order that had been in force was vacated.
Issues considered
- Whether an application under Section 482 CrPC can be entertained when the applicant fails to appear and there is a lapse of time.
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482
Subjects
- Section 482
- Criminal Procedure Code
- application dismissal
- lapse of time
- interim order vacated
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1253 of 2020
T.T. Ltd. Through Occupier And Ors.
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And Ors.
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aarohi Bhalla, Shilpi Jain Sharma,
Sunil Kumar Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., A.K.Verma
Court No. - 23
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Case called out.
2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. pertains to the year 2020.
3. When the matter was called out, none appeared on behalf of the
applicant to press this application, nor any request for adjournment or
pass over has been made.
4. Learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and Sri A.K.Verma, learned
counsel for private respondent are present.
5. The application appears to have lost its efficacy due to efflux of time,
hence, dismissed.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Rajeev Bharti,J.)
December 4, 2025
Renu/-
Digitally signed by :-
RENU AGARWAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…