Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

KUNWAR DIVYANKAR PRATAP SINGHversusTHE STATE OF U.P THRU SECY. HOME LUCKNOW AND ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

Holding

The application under Section 482 is dismissed as it has become infructuous.

Summary

Kunwar Divyankar Pratap Singh filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 248 of 2014) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter was listed as a ‘case not to be adjourned’, but the applicant’s counsel did not appear. The court observed that, due to the passage of time and the applicant’s non‑appearance, the application had become infructuous. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the application as infructuous and vacated any interim order that may have been in force. The applicant was granted liberty to file a recall application within eight weeks if a cause of action still existed, and the order was to be communicated to the trial court.

Issues considered

  • Whether the application under Section 482 of the CrPC is maintainable despite the applicant’s non‑appearance and the lapse of time.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Section 482
  • infructuous
  • high court inherent powers
  • application dismissal
  • delay
  • recall application

Judgment

                                                            Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:67788

                                         Court No. - 28

                                         Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 248 of 2014

                                         Applicant :- Kunwar Divyankar Pratap Singh
                                         Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P Thru Secy. Home
                                         Lucknow And Anr.
                                         Counsel for Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Shahi
                                         Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate

                                         Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.

                                         1. This Case is listed under the head of 'Cases not to be
                                         adjourned'.

                                         2. Case called out. None present for applicant.

                                         3. Sri Aniruddha Singh, learned A.G.A.-I for the State is
                                         present.

                                         4. It seems that by efflux of time, matter has become
                                         infructuous.

                                         5. The application is dismissed as having become infructuous.

                                         6. Interim order, if any, is vacated.

                                         7. The applicant is given liberty to file recall application within
                                         a period of eight weeks, if they feel that cause of action still
                                         survives.

                                         8. This order shall be communicated to the trial court concerned
                                         forthwith.

                                         9. Consigned to the records.

                                         Order Date :- 16.10.2023

                                         Ram Murti


Digitally signed by :-
RAM MURTI YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.