Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

LAVKUSH ALIAS ASHISH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND ANOTHER

Decided
Disposal
Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Holding

The application is rejected for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 2934 of 2022) seeking relief against the State. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants even after a revised call, although the learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court noted that the matter had been pending since 2022. Consequently, the application was rejected for non‑prosecution and any interim order previously granted was vacated.

Issues considered

  • Whether the application under Section 482 CrPC should be entertained in the absence of the applicants' appearance.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Section 482
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Application dismissed
  • Non‑prosecution

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            LUCKNOW
                                                      APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2934 of 2022

                                     Lavkush Alias Ashish And Others
                                                                                                .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                     State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And
                                     Another                                                       .....Opposite
                                                                                                         Party(s)

                                     Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Rakesh Kumar Modanwal
                                     Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.,   Raj    Kumar           Upadhyaya
                                                                     (R.K.Upadhyaya)

                                    Court No. - 16
                                                        HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.

                                    1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the applicants to press this
                                    application even in revised call. However, learned AGA is present.

                                    2. The matter pertains to the year 2022 and since then it is pending.

                                    3. Application is accordingly rejected for non prosecution. Interim order,
                                    if any, stands vacated.



                                                                                            (Brij Raj Singh,J.)
                                    January 5, 2026
                                    Rao/-




Digitally signed by :-
CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.