Allahabad High Court
SHAILENDRA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)
- Bench
- ACHAL SACHDEV
Holding
The application under Section 482 is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The applicants, Shailendra and four others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants even after a revised call. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The court also vacated any interim order that had been previously granted. No substantive merits of the application were considered.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when an application under Section 482 is not prosecuted due to non-appearance of counsel?
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482
Subjects
- Criminal Procedure Code
- Section 482
- Dismissal for want of prosecution
- Interim order vacated
- High Court procedure
Judgment
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:65504
Court No. - 87
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3360 of 2024
Applicant :- Shailendra And 4 Others
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Singh Sengar
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Gautam Kumar Banerji,Snehlata
Sharma
Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
1. None present on behalf of the applicants, even in the revised
call.
2. Accordingly, this matter is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 28.4.2025
Kumar Manish
Digitally signed by :-
MANISH TRIPATHI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…