Allahabad High Court
ABDUL KAREEMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI
Holding
The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The applicant, Abdul Kareem, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. Both parties failed to appear for the hearing, and even the revised call saw no representation from the applicant, though a brief holder for the State was present. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the application. Consequently, the judge dismissed the application for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the application were considered.
Issues considered
- Whether an application under Section 482 CrPC can be entertained when the applicant fails to appear for the hearing
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482
Subjects
- Section 482
- Criminal Procedure Code
- procedural dismissal
- want of prosecution
- court application
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 44397 of 2024
Abdul Kareem
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manish Kumar, Sumit Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Manish Kumar Tripathi
Court No. - 76
HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.
None appears for both the sides even in the revised call, however, Shri B.N.
Upadhyay, learned brief holder for the State is present.
On 3.1.2025, none was present on behalf of the applicant even in the revised
call.
In view of above, present application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
May 6, 2026
T. Sinha
(Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
TRIPTI SINHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…