Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAMANUJ MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. and ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

Holding

The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The applicant, Ramanuj Maurya, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The matter was listed before the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant while the State’s counsel was present. The court observed that the application was filed in 2016 and had remained pending for an extended period without any prosecution. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have been in force. The order directing the trial court to be informed of the dismissal was also issued.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when an application under Section 482 of the CrPC remains unprosecuted for a prolonged period?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Section 482
  • quashment of proceedings
  • want of prosecution
  • High Court order
  • application dismissal

Judgment

                                                            Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:83113

                                         Court No. - 30

                                         Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6898 of 2016

                                         Applicant :- Ramanuj Maurya
                                         Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr.
                                         Counsel for Applicant :- Ajai Kumar Singh
                                         Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Manish
                                         Bajpai,Pawan Kumar Mishra

                                         Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.

                                         1. Case called out in the revised list.

                                         2. None appears on behalf of the applicant.

                                         3. Learned A.G.A. for State-respondents is present.

                                         4. Since this application is quite old and pertains to the year
                                         2016, it is accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                         5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                         6. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the trial court
                                         concerned forthwith.



                                                                                   (Om Prakash Shukla,J.)

                                         Order Date :- 11.12.2024
                                         Gurpreet Singh




Digitally signed by :-
GURPREET SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.