Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

DEEPAK ARORA @ DEVENDRA SINGH ARORAversusTHE STATE OF U.P. and ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Holding

The application under Section 482 is dismissed as infructuous, and the interim order, if any, is vacated.

Summary

The applicant, Deepak Arora @ Devendra Singh Arora, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the matter had become infructuous and the applicant wished to withdraw the petition. The court examined the claim of withdrawal and found no impediment to dismissing the application as infructuous. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn and any interim order previously granted was vacated. The decision reflects the court’s discretion to dismiss a Section 482 application when the applicant no longer pursues the relief sought.

Issues considered

  • Whether an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code can be dismissed as infructuous/withdrawn upon the applicant's request?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Criminal Procedure
  • Section 482
  • withdrawal
  • infructuous application
  • interim order vacated

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            LUCKNOW
                                                      APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7356 of 2017

                                     Deepak Arora @ Devendra Singh Arora
                                                                                                  .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                     The State Of U.P. And Anr.
                                                                                                     .....Opposite
                                                                                                           Party(s)

                                     Counsel for Applicant(s)                       :    S.K. Tripathi
                                     Counsel for Opposite Party(s)                  :    Govt. Advocate

                                    Court No. - 23
                                                         HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.

                                    Shri S.K.Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Hansraj
                                    Verma, learned A.G.A. are present.

                                    Shri S.K.Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant states that the matter
                                    has become infructuoous.

                                    The petition is dismissed as infructuous as withdrawn.

                                    Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated.


                                                                                              (Rajeev Bharti,J.)
                                    October 31, 2025
                                    Shukla




Digitally signed by :-
ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.