Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ABDUL RAHMAN @ JASIMversusSTATE OF U.P.

Decided

Holding

The Court held that bail should be granted to the accused under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, subject to conditions.

Summary

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Abdul Rahman @ Jasim, who was in custody for offences under Sections 316(5) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant claimed innocence and cited that a co‑accused in similar circumstances had already been granted bail. The State opposed bail but did not dispute the applicant's claim of innocence. The Court examined the nature of the accusations, the severity of potential punishment, and the risk of evidence tampering, concluding that a case for bail existed despite the prima facie case. Consequently, the Court ordered the release of the applicant on bail subject to personal bond, sureties, and conditions to prevent tampering, intimidation, and further criminal activity.

Issues considered

  • Whether the accused is entitled to bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in view of the nature of the offences and risk of tampering with evidence
  • Whether the presence of a prima facie case and seriousness of the charges justify denial of bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • evidence tampering
  • witness intimidation

Judgment

         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
         CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11640 of 2026

Abdul Rahman @ Jasim
                                                             .....Applicant(s)
                                    Versus

State of U.P.
                                                                 .....Opposite
                                                                       Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Baikunth Nath Singh, Manish Kumar
                                Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 68
                  HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Arimardan Yadav, learned AGA
for the State-Respondent and perused the record.

This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha
Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of the accused-applicant seeking
enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 690 of 2025, under Sections 316(5),
318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Kotwali Nagar,
District Banda.

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is
innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and
is languishing in jail since 23.05.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant
submits that similarly circumstanced co-accused Sheebu has already been
enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated
16.04.2026 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 10137 of 2026. He
submits that the applicant has criminal antecedents of five other cases to his
credit which has been explained in the supplementary affidavit. He further
submits that there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or
tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been
prayed for.

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant,
but could not dispute the aforesaid fact.

Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations,
                                                                                               BAIL No. 11640 of 2026
                                                                      2

                                    severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting
                                    evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima
                                    facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made
                                    out.

                                    Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

                                    Let the accused-applicant, Abdul Rahman @ Jasim, involved in above
                                    mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a
                                    personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the
                                    satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:

                                    1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.

                                    2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity.

                                    3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and
                                    co-operate in the trial.

                                    4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the
                                    trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by
                                    the court concerned.

                                    In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below
                                    will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail.

                                    May 6, 2026
                                    pks

                                                                                          (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
PAWAN KUMAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.